Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 52 references

Versatile photonic frequency synthetic dimensions using a single Mach-Zehnder-interferometer-assisted device on thin-film lithium niobate

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single thin-film lithium niobate chip with two resonators coupled by an electro-optically tunable Mach-Zehnder interferometer can be programmed by DC and RF voltages to emulate the tight-binding lattice, the Hall ladder, and the Creutz…

desk verdict Tunable MZI cross-coupling on TFLN is a real, useful step, but the long-range claim and the uncharacterized sidebands need a direct answer. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13331 v2 pith:EXBFHYZF submitted 2024-11-20 physics.optics quant-ph

Zhao-An Wang , Xiao-Dong Zeng , Yi-Tao Wang , Jia-Ming Ren , Chun Ao , Zhi-Peng Li , Wei Liu , Nai-Jie Guo
show 8 more authors
Lin-Ke Xie Jun-You Liu Yu-Hang Ma Ya-Qi Wu Shuang Wang Jian-Shun Tang Chuan-Feng Li Guang-Can Guo
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsquant-ph
keywords frequencysyntheticdimensionthin-filmlithiumniobateMach-Zehnderinterferometerelectro-opticmodulationtunablecouplingCreutzladderHallAharonov-Bohmcage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that a single thin-film lithium niobate chip, with two ring resonators coupled by an electro-optically tunable Mach-Zehnder interferometer, can act as a programmable simulator for several lattice models in a frequency synthetic dimension. The key move is replacing the fixed beam splitter of earlier experiments with an interferometer driven by both DC bias and RF modulation: the DC part continuously sets the ordinary same-frequency coupling between the two resonators, while the RF part adds cross-coupling that hops between different frequency sites on the two resonators. With this, the authors realize the tight-binding lattice, the Hall ladder and the Creutz ladder on one device, and observe band structures, spin-momentum locking, a flat band, and the Aharonov-Bohm cage effect. If correct, the device turns a single chip from a fixed lattice into a reconfigurable platform for non-interacting lattice models.

What carries the argument

The tunable Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) is the central object. A fixed beam splitter only couples modes at the same frequency; the MZI, driven by a DC voltage and an RF modulation at $p\Omega$, acts as a frequency-converting coupler whose splitting ratio and phase are set electrically. The DC component sets the same-frequency (vertical) coupling $J^V$ anywhere from zero to full coupling; the RF component creates the cross-coupling $J^C$ between site $n$ of one ring and site $n+p$ of the other; and the relative phases of the three RF drives set the synthetic fluxes $\phi_1,\phi_2,\phi_3$ that thread the plaquettes. This single element thereby controls the off-diagonal entries of the effective Hamiltonian in quasimomentum space.

What would settle it

An independent characterization of the modulated MZI's scattering matrix—for instance, measuring the output spectrum while sweeping the probe detuning and directly detecting sideband amplitudes at orders $p\pm1$ and $p$ with a heterodyne or F-P measurement—would show whether the coupling amplitudes extracted from the band-structure fits are reproduced without fitting. If the sideband amplitudes at the first order do not scale as $J^C/\Omega$ or if second-order sidebands are non-negligible under the reported drive powers, the effective Hamiltonian picture fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a Mach-Zehnder interferometer with simultaneous DC and RF driving is a universal coupler for frequency synthetic dimensions: it provides continuously tunable vertical coupling ($J^V$), horizontal coupling within each resonator ($J^H$), and—for the first time in this platform—tunable cross-coupling ($J^C$) that connects site $n$ of one resonator to site $n+p$ of the other, with controllable phases that create synthetic magnetic flux. On a two-resonator device, choosing the DC and RF parameters reproduces the tight-binding chain, the Hall ladder, and the Creutz ladder; the measured band structures match the Hamiltonian $H_k = -2J^H_A\cos(k\Omega+\phi^H_A)\sigma_+ - 2J^H_B\cos(k\Omega+\phi^H_B)\sigma_- - [J^V + 2J^C\cos(k\Omega+\phi^C)]\sigma_x$, including the spin-momentum locking of the Hall ladder and the five-site localization of the Aharonov-Bohm cage in the Creutz ladder.

Load-bearing premise

The data analysis assumes the RF-modulated Mach-Zehnder interferometer behaves exactly like an ideal frequency-converting beamsplitter, with no appreciable higher-order sidebands, thermal drift, polarization conversion, or DC instability beyond the effective Hamiltonian of Eq. (1).

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The same two-resonator chip can be reprogrammed by DC and RF voltages to emulate the tight-binding chain, the Hall ladder, or the Creutz ladder, so a single device replaces several fixed designs.
  • Because $J^V$ is continuously tunable from zero to full coupling, the device can interpolate between decoupled lattices and a single larger lattice with halved free spectral range, enabling fine coupling-strength adjustment.
  • The phase control of the three RF drives yields tunable synthetic magnetic flux, allowing the band structure topology, spin-momentum locking direction, and flat-band condition to be switched in situ.
  • The observed five-site localization demonstrates the Aharonov-Bohm cage effect in the frequency domain, which the authors note could be used to engineer sideband multiplicity or frequency shifts.
  • By misaligning the resonator frequencies and adjusting the modulation frequencies accordingly, imaginary off-diagonal couplings can be introduced, extending the scheme to models such as the SSH chain.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The MZI's continuous tunability suggests a natural self-calibration procedure: since the band structure is a known functional of $(J^V, J^C, \phi)$, fitting it at several voltages could map the device's response and verify its modeled scattering matrix—an extension the paper does not report.
  • The same coupler concept should scale to arrays of more than two resonators, where the two-dimensional frequency-space lattice would admit gauge configurations that are hard to reach with fixed couplers, such as staggered fluxes or non-Abelian gauge fields.
  • The flat-band and cage regimes could be used for frequency-selective delay or storage of light, since the caged modes are decoupled from the rest of the lattice; this is a device application the paper mentions only briefly.
  • The approach is limited to single-particle, non-interacting Hamiltonians; adding nonlinearities on TFLN might extend it toward interaction effects, but that requires a different design, as the paper itself acknowledges.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes and experimentally demonstrates an MZI-assisted double-resonator device on thin-film lithium niobate for photonic frequency synthetic dimensions. By applying DC and RF signals to the MZI, the authors realize tunable vertical coupling, cross-coupling, and synthetic magnetic fluxes, and observe band structures of tight-binding lattices, the Hall ladder, the Creutz ladder, spin-momentum locking, and the Aharonov-Bohm cage effect. The central claim is that replacing fixed beam splitters with tunable MZIs yields a versatile programmable platform for simulating non-interacting lattice models.

Significance. If the claims hold, the device constitutes a significant advance in integrated photonic synthetic dimensions by enabling multiple tunable coupling types on a single chip. The experiments are well-designed, and the observations of spin-momentum locking and the Aharonov-Bohm cage are compelling qualitative demonstrations. However, the lack of independent characterization of the modulated MZI's scattering matrix and the unverified truncation at first-order sidebands leave a gap between the device voltages and the effective Hamiltonian. The abstract's claim of 'long-range' coupling also exceeds the demonstrated nearest-neighbor experiments.

major comments (3)
  1. [Theoretical framework, Eq. (1)] The effective Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) assumes that the RF-modulated MZI contributes only a static term J^V and a first-harmonic term J^C e^{-iφ^C}. For a sinusoidally driven phase modulator, the Fourier amplitudes are Bessel functions J_0(A), J_1(A), J_2(A), ..., so higher-order sidebands (p≥2) generically generate second-neighbor cross-couplings that are absent from Eq. (1). The paper does not report the modulation depth A or provide an independent measurement of the modulated MZI's scattering matrix. Because the Aharonov-Bohm cage is sensitive to such long-range terms, the observation of caging implies these terms are small, but no quantitative bound is given. Please add a characterization of the modulated MZI (e.g., a sideband spectrum) or an estimate of the Bessel amplitudes from the RF drive, and discuss the validity of truncating at p=1.
  2. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract and Introduction claim that the design 'extends such coupling to long-range scenario' and enables 'long-range coupling', but the experiments demonstrate only nearest-neighbor (p=1) cross-coupling between the two resonators. No measurement with p≥2 is presented, and the model Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) is restricted to p=1. Please either demonstrate p>1 coupling or revise the wording to 'cross-frequency (different-site) coupling' to avoid overclaiming.
  3. [Methods / Fig. 3] The numerical fits for the Aharonov-Bohm cage (Fig. 3f, g, i, j) use the probe detuning Δω as a fitted parameter (approximately 4J_H and 2J_H), and the coupling strengths J_H, J_V, J_C are set to their intended values without independent calibration. The qualitative agreement with the model is encouraging, but the paper would be stronger if the authors reported a calibration of each coupling strength from separate transmission measurements, along with uncertainties, to substantiate the claim of quantitative programmability.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Introduction] The word 'electro-opitc' should be 'electro-optic'.
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] The phrase 'crossing coupling' should be 'cross coupling'.
  3. [Results, Hall ladder paragraph] The sentence 'With the proper choice of ϕ1, we observe a pronounced dependence of the pseudospin character on k' would benefit from a brief explanation of how the pseudospin character is extracted from the projected band structures, since the measurement is only from resonator A.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the device capability is demonstrated against external models, and the numerical comparisons use control parameters rather than fitted predictions.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a device capability: an MZI-assisted double-resonator platform can realize tight-binding, Hall-ladder, and Creutz-ladder models by DC and RF control of coupling strengths and phases. This claim rests on a design ansatz, stated in the Theoretical framework, that the static MZI transmission gives J^V and the RF-modulated MZI gives J^C, with phases set by the driving signals. That mapping is not derived from the measured data, nor is any fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The observed band structures are compared with numerical calculations that use the same coupling parameters set by the experiment (e.g., J_H = 0.06Ω, J_C/J_H = 0.52), so the numerics are consistency checks rather than independent predictions; the paper does not present them as predictions. The only fitted quantity mentioned is the detuning Δω in the Aharonov-Bohm cage comparison (Fig. 3 caption), which is a laser-detuning offset used for normalization and does not determine the qualitative cage effect. The self-citation to Ref. [37] is a historical mention, not a load-bearing justification. The concern about higher-order Bessel sidebands from the modulated MZI is a correctness risk about the ideal first-order-sideband assumption, but it is not a circular reduction by construction: no equation is defined in terms of the target result, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. Therefore no enumerated circularity pattern is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests entirely on established physics and an experimentally calibrated device model. The only free parameters are the experimental control settings (coupling strengths, phases) and one fitted probe detuning in the AB-cage comparison. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • J_H (horizontal coupling strength) = 0.06 Ω or 0.028 Ω (calibrated)
    Set by RF amplitude on the resonator electrodes; value inferred from the measured band dispersion, not derived from first principles.
  • J_V (vertical coupling strength) = 0.75 × 2 J_H (Fig. 2d-g) or 1.1 × 2 J_H (Fig. 3b-c)
    Set by DC bias on the MZI; calibrated from the band structure splitting.
  • J_C (cross coupling strength) = 0 or 0.52 J_H (Fig. 3b-c), or J_H (AB cage condition)
    Set by RF amplitude on the MZI; calibrated.
  • Synthetic flux phases φ_H_A, φ_H_B, φ_C (and resulting φ1, φ2, φ3) = π/4, 3π/4, 0, π/2 etc.
    Set by relative phases of the three RF drives; treated as controllable inputs.
  • Probe detuning Δω in AB-cage numerical fits = approximately 4 J_H (caged) and 2 J_H (not caged)
    Fitted so that the simulated mode distribution matches the measured Fabry-Perot spectra in Fig. 3f-j.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The electro-optic phase modulation on a resonator with frequency pΩ couples modes n and n+p (rotating-wave approximation).
    Standard for dynamically modulated ring resonators; invoked throughout the theoretical framework section.
  • domain assumption The two resonators share the same FSR Ω and are lossless enough to be described by a Hermitian tight-binding Hamiltonian.
    Required for Eq. (1); the measured Q factor (1.7×10^5) indicates losses, which are treated as a common broadening rather than a modification of the dispersion.
  • domain assumption Time-resolved transmitted intensity maps to the projected band structure via the Floquet/scattering approach of Ref. 17.
    The measurement interpretation rests on this established method; stated in the Experiment section: 'This can be analyzed utilizing Floquet theory...'.
  • domain assumption The single-particle (non-interacting) description is valid for the observed regime.
    Explicitly stated in the Discussion: 'our frequency-spatial hybrid configuration can simulate non-interacting (single-particle) effective Hamiltonians'.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Versatile photonic frequency synthetic dimensions using a single Mach-Zehnder-interferometer-assisted device on thin-film lithium niobate." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EXBFHYZF

@misc{pith2026241113331,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Versatile photonic frequency synthetic dimensions using a single Mach-Zehnder-interferometer-assisted device on thin-film lithium niobate},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EXBFHYZF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13331}
}
read the original abstract

Investigating physical models with photonic synthetic dimensions has been generating great interest in vast fields of science. The rapid developing thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN) platform, for its numerous advantages including high electro-optic coefficient and scalability, is well compatible with the realization of synthetic dimensions in the frequency together with spatial domain. While coupling resonators with fixed beam splitters is a common experimental approach, it often lacks tunability and limits coupling between adjacent lattices to sites occupying the same frequency domain positions. Here, on the contrary, we conceive the resonator arrays connected by electro-optic tunable Mach-Zehnder interferometers in our configuration instead of fixed beam splitters. By applying bias voltage and RF modulation on the interferometers, our design extends such coupling to long-range scenario and allows for continuous tuning on each coupling strength and synthetic effective magnetic flux. Therefore, our design enriches controllable coupling types that are essential for building programmable lattice networks and significantly increases versatility. As the example, we experimentally fabricate a two-resonator prototype on the TFLN platform, and on this single chip we realize well-known models including tight-binding lattices, topological Hall ladder and Creutz ladder. We directly observe the band structures in the quasi-momentum space and important phenomena such as spin-momentum locking and the Aharonov-Bohm cage effect. These results demonstrate the potential for convenient simulations of more complex models in our configuration.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.13331 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic and experimental setup. (a) Configuration of a lattice network in frequency synthetic dimensions. The lattice network is simulated by a train of modulated resonators. Instead of fixed beam splitters (BS), MZIs tunable by DC and RF signals are used to couple the adjacent resonators (purple boxes). The lattice network consequently contains three types of coupling J H i,p (orange), J V i (violet), J C i,p (gr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Experimental obtained band structures of tight-binding lattices and the Hall ladder. The band structures exhibit tight-binding lattice characters when two resonators are either not coupled (J V = 0, a) or fully coupled into a large resonator whose length is doubled and FSR is halved (b). J H B is set to zero in the left panels of (b), while set to be equal to J H A in the right panels. The right panel in (a) and the… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Experimental obtained band structures of the Creutz ladder and direct observation of the Aharonov￾Bohm cage effect. (a) Illustration of the Creutz ladder. (b and c) The heat maps display two general band structures of the Creutz ladder given different ϕ1 and ϕ C , where J V /2J H = 1.1, J C /JH = 0.52 and J H = 0.06Ω. (d) The flat band structure measured at J V = 0, J H = J C = 0.028Ω and −ϕ H A = ϕ H B = π/2. The a… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Lustig et al

    E. Lustig et al. , Photonic topological insulator in syn- thetic dimensions, Nature567, 356 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Ozawaet al., Topological photonics, Rev

    T. Ozawaet al., Topological photonics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015006 (2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, Topological photonics, Nat. Photonics8, 821 (2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    S. K. Sridhar et al. , Quantized topological pumping in floquet synthetic dimensions with a driven dissipative photonic molecule, Nat. Phys.20, 843 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Regensburger et al., Parity–time synthetic photonic lat- tices, Nature488, 167 (2012)

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Luo et al., Quantum simulation of 2d topological physics in a 1d array of optical cavities, Nat

    X.-W. Luo et al., Quantum simulation of 2d topological physics in a 1d array of optical cavities, Nat. Commun. 6, 7704 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Luo et al

    X.-W. Luo et al. , Synthetic-lattice enabled all-optical devices based on orbital angular momentum of light, Nat. Commun. 8, 16097 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    L. Yuan, Q. Lin, M. Xiao, and S. Fan, Synthetic dimen- sion in photonics, Optica5, 1396 (2018)

    2018

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Yuan et al

    L. Yuan et al. , Photonic gauge potential in one cavity with synthetic frequency and orbital angular momentum dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 083903 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    L. Yuan, A. Dutt, and S. Fan, Synthetic frequency dimensions in dynamically modulated ring resonators, APL Photonics6, 071102 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    L. Yuan, M. Xiao, Q. Lin, and S. Fan, Synthetic space with arbitrary dimensions in a few rings undergoing dynamic modulation, Phys. Rev. B97, 104105 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    K. Fang, Z. Yu, and S. Fan, Realizing effective magnetic field for photons by controlling the phase of dynamic modulation, Nat. Photonics6, 782 (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    Lumer and othersi, Light guiding by artificial gauge fields, Nat

    Y. Lumer and othersi, Light guiding by artificial gauge fields, Nat. Photonics13, 339 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Wang et al

    K. Wang et al. , Multidimensional synthetic chiral-tube lattices via nonlinear frequency conversion, Light: Sci. Appl. 9, 132 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Chenet al., Synthetic gauge fields in a single optome- chanical resonator, Phys

    Y. Chenet al., Synthetic gauge fields in a single optome- chanical resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 123603 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Li et al

    G. Li et al. , Direct extraction of topological zak phase with the synthetic dimension, Light: Sci. Appl.12, 81 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Duttet al., Experimental band structure spectroscopy along a synthetic dimension, Nat

    A. Duttet al., Experimental band structure spectroscopy along a synthetic dimension, Nat. Commun. 10, 3122 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    Dutt et al., A single photonic cavity with two inde- pendent physical synthetic dimensions, Science367, 59 (2020)

    A. Dutt et al., A single photonic cavity with two inde- pendent physical synthetic dimensions, Science367, 59 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    Dutt et al

    A. Dutt et al. , Creating boundaries along a synthetic frequency dimension, Nat. Commun.13, 3377 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Liet al., Dynamic band structure measurement in the synthetic space, Sci

    G. Liet al., Dynamic band structure measurement in the synthetic space, Sci. Adv.7, eabe4335 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Wang et al., Generating arbitrary topological wind- ings of a non-hermitian band, Science371, 1240 (2021)

    K. Wang et al., Generating arbitrary topological wind- ings of a non-hermitian band, Science371, 1240 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    K. Wang, A. Dutt, C. C. Wojcik, and S. Fan, Topological complex-energy braiding of non-hermitian bands, Nature 598, 59 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Zhang, C

    M. Zhang, C. Wang, P. Kharel, D. Zhu, and M. Lončar, Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators: when performance meets scalability, Optica 8, 652 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    J. Lin, F. Bo, Y. Cheng, and J. Xu, Advances in on-chip photonic devices based on lithium niobate on insulator, Photon. Res.8, 1910 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Zhanget al., Broadband electro-optic frequency comb generation in a lithium niobate microring resonator, Nature 568, 373 (2019)

    M. Zhanget al., Broadband electro-optic frequency comb generation in a lithium niobate microring resonator, Nature 568, 373 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    Zhang, C

    M. Zhang, C. Wang, R. Cheng, A. Shams-Ansari, and M. Lončar, Monolithic ultra-high-q lithium niobate mi- croring resonator, Optica4, 1536 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    Feng et al

    H. Feng et al. , Integrated lithium niobate microwave photonic processing engine, Nature627, 80 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Yuet al., Integrated femtosecond pulse generator on thin-film lithium niobate, Nature612, 252 (2022)

    M. Yuet al., Integrated femtosecond pulse generator on thin-film lithium niobate, Nature612, 252 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Xu et al., High-performance coherent optical modu- lators based on thin-film lithium niobate platform, Nat

    M. Xu et al., High-performance coherent optical modu- lators based on thin-film lithium niobate platform, Nat. Commun. 11, 3911 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, N. Goldman, O. Zilberberg, and I. Carusotto, Synthetic dimensions in integrated photonics: From optical isolation to four-dimensional quantum hall physics, Phys. Rev. A93, 043827 (2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    Liet al., Observation of flat-band and band transition in the synthetic space, Adv

    G. Liet al., Observation of flat-band and band transition in the synthetic space, Adv. Photonics4, 036002 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    H. X. Dinh et al. , Reconfigurable synthetic dimension frequency lattices in an integrated lithium niobate ring 8 cavity, Commun. Phys.7, 185 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Ye et al

    R. Ye et al. , Construction of various time-dependent hamiltonians on a single photonic chip, arXiv:2408.00287 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    U. A. Javidet al., Chip-scale simulations in a quantum- correlated synthetic space, Nat. Photonics 17, 883 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Y. Hu, C. Reimer, A. Shams-Ansari, M. Zhang, and M. Loncar, Realization of high-dimensional frequency crystals in electro-optic microcombs, Optica 7, 1189 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    Hu et al., Mirror-induced reflection in the frequency domain, Nat

    Y. Hu et al., Mirror-induced reflection in the frequency domain, Nat. Commun.13, 6293 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    Wang et al

    Z.-A. Wang et al. , On-chip photonic simulating band structures toward arbitrary-range coupled frequency lat- tices, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 233805 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    Hügel and B

    D. Hügel and B. Paredes, Chiral ladders and the edges of quantum hall insulators, Phys. Rev. A89, 023619 (2014)

    2014

  31. [39]

    Creutz, End states, ladder compounds, and domain- wall fermions, Phys

    M. Creutz, End states, ladder compounds, and domain- wall fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 2636 (1999)

    1999

  32. [40]

    Zurita, C

    J. Zurita, C. E. Creffield, and G. Platero, Topology and interactions in the photonic creutz and creutz-hubbard ladders, Adv. Quantum Technol.3, 1900105 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    J. S. C. Hunget al., Quantum simulation of the bosonic creutz ladder with a parametric cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 100503 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    He et al., Flat-band localization in creutz superradi- ance lattices, Phys

    Y. He et al., Flat-band localization in creutz superradi- ance lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 103601 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    Daiet al., A programmable topological photonic chip, Nat

    T. Daiet al., A programmable topological photonic chip, Nat. Mater.23, 928 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Lin, X.-Q

    Q. Lin, X.-Q. Sun, M. Xiao, S.-C. Zhang, and S. Fan, A three-dimensional photonic topological insulator using a two-dimensional ring resonator lattice with a synthetic frequency dimension, Sci. Adv.4, eaat2774 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    Vidal, R

    J. Vidal, R. Mosseri, and B. Douçot, Aharonov-bohm cages in two-dimensional structures, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 5888 (1998)

    1998

  38. [46]

    Vidal, B

    J. Vidal, B. Douçot, R. Mosseri, and P. Butaud, Interac- tion induced delocalization for two particles in a periodic potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 3906 (2000)

    2000

  39. [47]

    Vidal, P

    J. Vidal, P. Butaud, B. Douçot, and R. Mosseri, Disorder and interactions in aharonov-bohm cages, Phys. Rev. B 64, 155306 (2001)

    2001

  40. [48]

    Douçot and J

    B. Douçot and J. Vidal, Pairing of cooper pairs in a fully frustrated josephson-junction chain, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 227005 (2002)

    2002

  41. [49]

    Cheng, K

    D. Cheng, K. Wang, C. Roques-Carmes, E. Lustig, O. Y. Long, H. Wang, and S. Fan, Non-abelian lattice gauge fields in photonic synthetic frequency dimensions, Nature 637, 52 (2025)

    2025

  42. [50]

    Daiet al., Non-hermitian topological phase transitions controlled by nonlinearity, Nat

    T. Daiet al., Non-hermitian topological phase transitions controlled by nonlinearity, Nat. Phys.20, 101 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    Zheng et al

    Y. Zheng et al. , Multichip multidimensional quantum networks with entanglement retrievability, Science381, 221 (2023)

    2023

  44. [52]

    Baoet al., Very-large-scale integrated quantum graph photonics, Nat

    J. Baoet al., Very-large-scale integrated quantum graph photonics, Nat. Photonics17, 573 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.