Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 54 references

Modeling the effect of hydrodynamic wakes in dynamical models of large-scale fish schools

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Simulations with a DNS-parameterized wake model show that vortex wakes organize fish schools into oblique diamond patterns, especially when social alignment dominates attraction.

desk verdict A DNS-anchored vortex-wake ABM for fish schools that shows wakes can order schools, but the headline pattern hinges on an unvalidated wake-superposition assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13406 v1 pith:M2YF7CHQ submitted 2024-11-20 physics.flu-dyn physics.bio-ph

Ji Zhou , Jung-Hee Seo , Rajat Mittal This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dynphysics.bio-ph
keywords fishschoolsagent-basedmodelhydrodynamicwakesvortexwakedirectnumericalsimulationcollectivebehaviorschoolingtopologyRankinevortices
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper develops an agent-based model of fish schooling that adds a DNS-parameterized vortex wake to the usual social rules of attraction, alignment, and vision. The central claim is that hydrodynamic wakes are not a source of disorder but an organizing force: in simulations with strong alignment and weak attraction, turning on the wake changes the school from a diffuse, disorganized cluster into a streamwise-oblique diamond pattern, with the first principal component of the school's spatial distribution explaining 11.95% of the variance versus 1.54% without the wake. The authors argue that trailing fish are passively drawn to the narrow drifting regions near the edges of a leading fish's wake, and that this effect strengthens when alignment keeps fish consistently oriented. If correct, the result implies that school topology can encode hydrodynamic information and that purely social rules are insufficient to explain observed formations.

What carries the argument

The central object is the phenomenological wake model: each half tail-beat sheds a line of discrete Rankine vortices of alternating sign, arranged in the oblique pattern observed in the authors' three-dimensional direct numerical simulations of a mackerel-like carangiform swimmer, with vortex strength and decay rates fitted to those simulations. This wake field is added to a potential-flow model of the fish body (four source-sink pairs shaped to an ellipsoid) to produce the velocity perturbation acting on each focal fish. Surge, sway, and yaw dynamics are governed by Newtonian equations in which hydrodynamic forces and moments are computed from DNS-fitted drag, lift, and moment coefficients, while social interactions enter through a vision-limited attraction and alignment torque with attention parsimony. The wake-induced organization emerges because the modeled oblique jet has narrow regions of favorable forward velocity near its edges, and the superposition of aligned wakes strengthens these edge regions as they propagate downstream.

What would settle it

Simulate a small school (two or three fish) with the same carangiform kinematics using a fully resolved multi-body DNS and measure the induced velocity field behind the leading fish; if the trailing fish do not preferentially settle near the wake-edge drifting regions, or if the first-PC explained variance does not increase when the wake is present, the model's central organizing mechanism is falsified. More directly, compare the modeled oblique Rankine-vortex wake to the actual wake of a fish swimming in a school: if the wake is substantially modified by neighbors, the superposition assumption breaks.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's key discovery is that incorporating a phenomenological model of the oblique vortex wake of a carangiform swimmer into a Newtonian agent-based school model produces significantly more organized school topologies than potential-flow-only models. In the high-alignment regime ($\alpha_T = 0.1$), where attraction is weak relative to alignment, wake-on simulations yield an oblique 'diamond' pattern in which each follower sits near the edge of the wake of the fish ahead; the first principal component of the reconstructed fish distribution explains 11.95% of the variance, compared with 1.54% when the wake is disabled. In the high-attraction regime ($\alpha_T=0.9$), the wake still improves spatial coherence (3.07% versus 1.42%) but the oblique structure is less pronounced because strong attraction overrides the passive hydrodynamic drafting. The paper further shows that wider wakes (lower Reynolds number or smaller caudal-fin aspect ratio) enhance ordering in high-alignment schools, and that there is an optimal vortex strength beyond which organization degrades.

Load-bearing premise

The multi-fish hydrodynamic interaction is represented as a linear superposition of a potential flow and discrete Rankine vortices whose parameters were fitted to a single-fish DNS, and the wake of a fish is assumed not to be modified by trailing or adjacent fish; the paper's conclusion about wake-induced school organization would not hold if this simplified wake representation is inaccurate in multi-fish configurations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Wakes act as an ordering mechanism, so school shape is not set by social rules alone; hydrodynamic history matters.
  • Fish that generate wider wakes, such as those swimming at lower Reynolds numbers or with smaller caudal-fin aspect ratios, should show more ordered diamond formations when highly polarized.
  • There is an optimal wake strength: too-strong vortices partially destabilize the school, implying a sweet spot for hydrodynamic schooling benefits.
  • The model predicts that wake-induced organization is strongest when alignment dominates over attraction, so species or contexts with weak social attraction should exhibit the clearest hydrodynamic patterning.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension would be to apply the same PCA pipeline to experimental tracking of real fish schools; if wake-driven ordering is real, the first-PC explained variance should rise when visual or social cues are experimentally reduced.
  • The assumption that each fish's wake is unaffected by neighbors is likely the first to fail in dense schools; including wake-wake interactions could shift the predicted optimal vortex strength and should be tested against multi-fish DNS.
  • The emergence of diamond and staggered patterns offers a hydrodynamic rationale for the inline and phalanx configurations debated in the fish-schooling literature, and could inform bio-inspired design of underwater vehicle formations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops a two-dimensional agent-based model of fish schooling in which each fish is subject to social forces (attraction, alignment, wall avoidance) and to hydrodynamic forces from a potential-flow representation of the body plus a discrete Rankine-vortex wake whose parameters are fitted to the authors' three-dimensional direct numerical simulations of a single carangiform swimmer. The model is used to compare school topology in simulations with and without the wake model, for various numbers of fish and for high-alignment (alpha_T=0.1) versus high-attraction (alpha_T=0.9) social regimes. The central claim is that adding the vortex wake increases the spatial organization of the school, most strongly in the high-alignment regime, producing an oblique 'diamond' pattern; the first principal component of the school distribution explains 11.95% of the variance with wake versus 1.54% without (Section III.B, Fig. 15). The paper also reports sensitivities to wake angle (Section III.C) and vortex strength (Section III.D).

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work is a valuable contribution because it bridges behavior-focused agent-based models and hydrodynamic realism, and it generates concrete, falsifiable predictions: e.g., wider wakes and stronger vortices should enhance schooling organization in highly polarized groups (Figs. 17 and 18). The use of 300 ensemble runs per condition and DNS-calibrated hydrodynamic coefficients is a strength, and the model's explicit separation of social and hydrodynamic mechanisms allows the wake effect to be isolated cleanly. However, the absence of multi-fish validation of the wake-superposition assumption and the lack of uncertainty quantification on the PCA metrics currently limit the strength of the physical conclusions. The paper is well-suited to the journal and would benefit from targeted additional validation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II.H] Section II.H states that 'the wake flow generated by a given fish is not modified by any trailing or adjacent fish,' and Section II.E (Eq. 8) represents the school flow as a linear superposition of single-fish potential and wake fields. The central mechanism for the diamond pattern in Section III.B — that wake edges from successive fish superpose to create stronger attractive edges — is a direct consequence of this assumption. Because the superposition has not been validated for multi-fish configurations, the physical claim that vortices improve school organization is not yet robust. I recommend adding a targeted validation (e.g., a two-fish DNS or experiment) or, at minimum, a sensitivity test that perturbs or attenuates the wake behind a trailing fish to show that the qualitative result does not depend on the exact superposition.
  2. [Section II.D, Eq. (4)] The hydrodynamic force and moment coefficients C1, C2, C3 are quasi-steady, obtained from DNS of a stationary fish at fixed angles of attack. In the school simulations, fish are subjected to a periodically unsteady wake from neighbors, and the quasi-steady approximation neglects unsteady effects such as added mass, wake history, and dynamic stall. These effects could alter the magnitude and location of the hydrodynamic forces that are claimed to attract trailing fish to the wake edge. Please justify the quasi-steady assumption quantitatively, for example by comparing with an unsteady estimate of the forces on a fish in a periodic wake, or by showing that the time-averaged forces dominate the dynamics.
  3. [Section III.B, Figs. 14 and 15] The quantitative claim that wakes organize schools is based on the explained variance of the first principal component (11.95% vs. 1.54%). The PCA is computed from 300 simulations with five snapshots each, but no confidence intervals or statistical significance tests are reported. Since the ensemble size is finite, the difference could be sensitive to snapshot selection or to a few outlier configurations. Please include a bootstrap or permutation-based uncertainty estimate for the PCA variances, or otherwise demonstrate that the difference is statistically robust.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section II.D] The formula for the flow angle phi appears mis-typeset; please clarify using an explicit atan2 expression for the two components of the relative velocity.
  2. [Table II] The preferred distance R0 is listed as '1/LB', which is dimensionally inconsistent; since lengths are nondimensionalized by LB, R0 should be a dimensionless value (or state R0 = 1 LB before nondimensionalization).
  3. [Section II.F] The segmentation of the vision field into six sectors is stated to be based on 'various tests' without details; please provide a reference, a description of the tests, or a brief sensitivity analysis.
  4. [Figs. 17 and 18 captions] The notation 'N = 1,500' in the captions refers to the number of PCA samples (300 simulations x 5 snapshots), which is easily confused with the number of fish; please relabel as 'Nsamples = 1,500'.
  5. [Section III.C] The description of the effect of wake angle on schooling organization is contradictory at first reading ('wider wakes greatly contribute' followed by 'wider wakes have a detrimental effect' for beta <= 11 degrees). Please revise to state the non-monotonic dependence clearly and define the threshold beta approx 14 degrees.
  6. [Section II.A and Fig. 1 caption] There is a typo 'Talbe I' in Section II.A, and in the Fig. 1 caption 'theta_ij is the angle between r_ij and U1' should refer to the surge direction rather than the scalar velocity U1.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the wake model is calibrated to single-fish DNS, and the school-level organization metrics are emergent outputs of simulations that are not used in the fitting procedure.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that adding a vortex-wake model to a fish-schooling model changes emergent school topology, especially under high alignment. The wake model parameters are fitted to single-fish DNS data: force coefficients from static-body DNS at angle of attack (Section II.D) and wake vortex strengths, positions, and decay rates from single-fish wake DNS (Section II.E and Table IV). The school-level outcomes—diamond-like oblique patterns, nearest-neighbor-distance distributions, and PCA explained variance—are not inputs to these fits; they arise from simulating many interacting fish under identical social parameters with and without the wake. Thus the with-wake versus without-wake comparison is a genuine emergent prediction rather than a quantity forced by construction. The assertion that each fish's wake is not modified by neighboring fish (Section II.H) is an explicit modeling simplification, and the mechanism explaining the diamond pattern relies on linear superposition of unmodified wakes. This is a legitimate modeling assumption, not a circular reduction, because the predicted organization is not contained in the single-fish calibration data; it is a consequence of the assumed wake physics, whose validity is a correctness concern rather than a circularity concern. The paper cites several of the authors' prior DNS studies for wake structure and solver validation, but those are independent computational results used as calibration and comparison, not unverified self-citations invoked to forbid alternatives. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is smuggled in via self-citation, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. The derivation chain is self-contained relative to its stated inputs, and the central claim has independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on a large number of hand-set and fitted parameters: singularity strengths for the potential-flow body model, a dozen wake-construction coefficients, and social/vision parameters chosen by the authors. The wake parameters are calibrated to the authors' own DNS of a single mackerel, and the social parameters are guided by observed schooling behavior but not systematically measured. None of these parameters are fitted to the school-level topology, so the main qualitative comparison between with-wake and without-wake cases is not circular, but the quantitative realism of the result depends on all of them.

free parameters (5)
  • Potential-flow singularity strengths and positions (m1-m4, a1-a4) = m = 7.677e-4, 7.726e-4, 7.677e-4, 4.562e-4; a = 0.40, 0.10, 0.30, 0.475
    Fitted iteratively to minimize penetration velocity across an ellipsoid approximating the fish body (Table III).
  • Wake circulation and decay coefficients = Gamma0 = 2*pi*Vs*R_wake; decay c1=-0.137, c2=0.4
    Exponential circulation decay fit to DNS wake data (Table IV).
  • Wake geometry coefficients (spanwise spread, oblique angle, end strength) = Vs fraction 0.25; multiple c1, c2, c3 values in Table IV
    Chosen to reproduce the oblique vortex-pair pattern from DNS (Fig. 5, Table IV).
  • Social interaction coefficients = Kp=1, Kd=3, KAT+KAL=30, Kw=10, K_vision=1/n_tracked
    Guided by observed schooling patterns and varied in the paper (Section II.G, Table II).
  • Vision field parameters = alpha=2 LB, six visual sectors
    Selected after 'various tests'; no experimental reference for mackerel (Section II.F).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Fish body assumed to be a neutrally buoyant ellipsoid with uniform density equal to water; motion restricted to a horizontal plane with surge, sway, and yaw degrees of freedom.
    Section II.A-II.B simplifies 3D body to 2D dynamics, a common treatment in schooling models.
  • ad hoc to paper Hydrodynamic forces and moments can be represented by quasi-steady coefficients (C1, C2, C3) from DNS of stationary fish at angles of attack.
    Section II.D Eq. 4; unsteady wake effects on a swimming fish are not explicitly resolved in the force model.
  • ad hoc to paper Wake velocity field is a linear superposition of potential flow and discrete Rankine vortices, with parameters fitted to a single-fish DNS.
    Section II.E, Tables III-IV.
  • domain assumption Wake generated by a fish is not modified by trailing or adjacent fish (one-way coupling).
    Section II.H final paragraph.
  • domain assumption Fish sense neighbors only through vision, via a cardioid field with attention parsimony; lateral line and pressure sensing are omitted.
    Section II.F; the conclusion acknowledges that only vision-based sensing is modeled.
  • domain assumption Bainbridge empirical tailbeat frequency relation F = (4/3)(Uo/LB + 1) applies.
    Section II.C, Ref [39].
invented entities (1)
  • Discrete Rankine vortex wake elements
    purpose: To reproduce the oblique alternating-sign vortex wake seen in DNS of a carangiform swimmer within an agent-based model.
    These vortices are a phenomenological construct with hand-fitted positions and strengths; they are calibrated to the authors' DNS but make no falsifiable prediction outside the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Modeling the effect of hydrodynamic wakes in dynamical models of large-scale fish schools." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M2YF7CHQ

@misc{pith2026241113406,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Modeling the effect of hydrodynamic wakes in dynamical models of large-scale fish schools},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M2YF7CHQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13406}
}
read the original abstract

A novel model of the wake of swimming fish is developed and incorporated into a dynamical model of a fish school to explore the effect of hydrodynamics on the emergent behavior in schooling fish. The model incorporates well-established rules for attraction, alignment, and visual detection via a force-momentum balance in the surge, sway, and yaw directions, thereby allowing us to include the effects of body size, shape, and inertia in to the dynamics of fish motion. The key novelty of the model lies in the modeling of the hydrodynamics, which includes not only the potential flow induced by the body of the fish but also the vortex wakes generated by the fish. These hydrodynamic features, as well as the surge, sway, and yaw force coefficients, are parameterized via three-dimensional high-fidelity direct numerical simulations of a carangiform swimmer, thereby enabling a higher degree of realism in these models. The model is used to examine the effect of wake characteristics on the topology and movement of fish schools. The simulations indicate that these wake vortices lead to improved organization within the schools, especially in situations where the social forces are relatively weak.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.13406 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: The Lagrangian coordinate system and fish anatomy. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Direct numerical simulations of a static fish under different angles of attack. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Time-averaged contour plot of the induced velocity in the surge direction. Velocity profiles are plotted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (17 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Potential flow field of a single fish heading to the negative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Instantaneous snapshots of fish generated wake from the direct numerical simulation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: shows the streamline and velocity contour for the resultant velocity field of a solitary swimming fish. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: A single swimming fish at steady-state with the potential field and the wake implemented. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Instantaneous streamline and velocity contour plots of a minimal school of fish (two fish). The relative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Illustration of the preferred distance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: The trends of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Instantaneous distributions of a 20-fish, high-alignment ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Instantaneous plots of three distinguish collective patterns of 150 fish swimming in a circular tank, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Instantaneous distributions of 20-fish schools, comparing in different wake and behavior modes. Blue dots [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Statistics of the nearest neighbor distance (NND) for 20-fish cases, comparing between “with wake” and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Reconstructed school distribution from first principal components of different numbers of fish at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: PCA results on 10-fish cases at high-alignment and high-attraction conditions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Direct numerical simulations of a free-swimming fish under different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17: Results of PCA on fish distributions of 10-fish schools with various wake width (angle), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18: Results of PCA on fish distributions of 10-fish schools with various wake strength, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19: Workflow for conducting Principal Component Analysis (PCA) on 10-fish schooling distributions. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_19.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    While these scalar metrics provide valuable insights, they cannot capture the topology or spatial structure of the school

    Principal Component Analysis Metrics like polarity [11, 49], which quantifies the degree of co-orientation, and mean nearest neighbor distance (NND), which measures school compactness, are commonly used to analyze schooling behavior. While these scalar metrics provide valuable insights, they cannot capture the topology or spatial structure of the school. ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    These tables detail fish physiology, social behavior parameters, and hydrodynamic factors

    Model Parameters Tables of the model parameters used in this study are included below for reference. These tables detail fish physiology, social behavior parameters, and hydrodynamic factors. The rich parameter space allows this model to fit different fish species with corresponding behavior and hydrodynamic features. 24 TABLE II: Parameters of fish physi...

    work page

  3. [3]

    B. L. Partridge, The structure and function of fish schools, Fish Morphology: Horizon of New Research 246, 114 (1982)

    work page 1982

  4. [4]

    Pavlov and A

    D. Pavlov and A. O. Kasumyan, Patterns and mechanisms of schooling behavior in fish: A review, Journal of Ichthyology 40, 163 (2000)

    work page 2000

  5. [5]

    Zhou, J.-H

    J. Zhou, J.-H. Seo, and R. Mittal, A flow-physics-informed dynamic model of collective swimming in fish, Bulletin of the American Physical Society 66 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Weihs, Hydromechanics of fish schooling, Nature 241, 290 (1973)

    D. Weihs, Hydromechanics of fish schooling, Nature 241, 290 (1973)

    1973

  7. [7]

    Zhou, J.-H

    J. Zhou, J.-H. Seo, and R. Mittal, Complex emergent dynamics in fish schools-insights from a flow-physics-informed model of collective swimming in fish, Bulletin of the American Physical Society (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    T. J. Pitcher, A. E. Magurran, and I. J. Winfield, Fish in larger shoals find food faster, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 10, 149 (1982)

    1982

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    Zhou, J.-H

    J. Zhou, J.-H. Seo, and R. Mittal, Effect of turbulence on the hydrodynamics of fish schools, Bulletin of the American Physical Society (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    M.-L. B. Anras, J.-P. Lagard´ ere, and J.-Y. Lafaye, Diel activity rhythm of seabass tracked in a natural environment: group effects on swimming patterns and amplitudes, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54, 162 (1997)

    1997

  3. [11]

    Zhou, J.-H

    J. Zhou, J.-H. Seo, and R. Mittal, Effect of schooling on flow generated sounds from carangiform swimmers, Bioinspiration & Biomimetics 19, 036015 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    Mittal, J

    B. Mittal, J. Zhou, and R. Mittal, Exploring predator interaction with a school of prey fish using a flow-physics informed agent-based model, Bulletin of the American Physical Society (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    Filella, F

    A. Filella, F. Nadal, C. Sire, E. Kanso, and C. Eloy, Model of collective fish behavior with hydrodynamic interactions, 26 Physical Review Letters 120, 35 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    A. P. Maertens, A. Gao, and M. S. Triantafyllou, Optimal undulatory swimming for a single fish-like body and for a pair of interacting swimmers, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 813, 301 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    Seo and R

    J.-H. Seo and R. Mittal, Improved swimming performance in schooling fish via leading-edge vortex enhancement, Bioin- spiration & Biomimetics 17, 066020 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    M. N. Mabrouk and D. Floryan, Group cohesion and passive dynamics of a pair of inertial swimmers with three-dimensional hydrodynamic interactions, Bioinspiration & Biomimetics 10.1088/1748-3190/ad936d (2024)

    2024 doi

  9. [17]

    Pan and H

    Y. Pan and H. Dong, Computational analysis of hydrodynamic interactions in a high-density fish school, Physics of Fluids 32, 10.1063/5.0028682 (2020)

    2020 doi

  10. [18]

    Ashraf, H

    I. Ashraf, H. Bradshaw, T. T. Ha, J. Halloy, R. Godoy-Diana, and B. Thiria, Simple phalanx pattern leads to energy saving in cohesive fish schooling, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114, 9599 (2017)

    2017

  11. [19]

    Verma, G

    S. Verma, G. Novati, and P. Koumoutsakos, Efficient collective swimming by harnessing vortices through deep reinforcement learning, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115, 5849 (2018)

    2018

  12. [20]

    C. Wei, Q. Hu, T. Zhang, and Y. Zeng, Passive hydrodynamic interactions in minimal fish schools, Ocean Engineering 247, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110574 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Saadat, F

    M. Saadat, F. Berlinger, A. Sheshmani, R. Nagpal, G. V. Lauder, and H. Haj-Hariri, Hydrodynamic advantages of in-line schooling, Bioinspiration and Biomimetics 16, 10.1088/1748-3190/abe137 (2021)

    2021 doi

  14. [22]

    T. Han, Q. Zhong, A. Mivehchi, D. B. Quinn, and K. W. Moored, Revealing the mechanism and scaling laws behind equilibrium altitudes of near-ground pitching hydrofoils, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 978, A5 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    P. C. Ormonde, M. Kurt, A. Mivechki, and K. W. Moored, Two-dimensionally stable self-organization arises in sim- ple schooling swimmers through hydrodynamic interactions, arXiv 2102.03571 (2021), version 3, revised 31 Jul 2023, 2102.03571

    2021 arXiv

  16. [24]

    McKee, A

    A. McKee, A. P. Soto, P. Chen, and M. J. McHenry, The sensory basis of schooling by intermittent swimming in the rummy-nose tetra (hemigrammus rhodostomus): Schooling by intermittent swimming, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 287, 10.1098/rspb.2020.0568 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    M. L. Timm, R. S. Pandhare, and H. Masoud, Multi-body hydrodynamic interactions in fish-like swimming, Applied Mechanics Reviews 76, 030801 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    J. C. Liao, A review of fish swimming mechanics and behaviour in altered flows, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 362, 1973 (2007)

    2007

  19. [27]

    Huang, F

    C. Huang, F. Ling, and E. Kanso, Collective phase transitions in confined fish schools, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121, e2406293121 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Viana, T

    F. Viana, T. Funada, D. Joseph, N. Tashiro, and Y. Sonoda, Potential flow of a second-order fluid over a tri-axial ellipsoid, Journal of applied mathematics 2005, 341 (2005)

    2005

  21. [29]

    M¨ uller-Hartmann and J

    E. M¨ uller-Hartmann and J. Zittartz, New type of phase transition, Physical Review Letters 33, 893 (1974)

    1974

  22. [30]

    Huth and C

    A. Huth and C. Wissel, The simulation of the movement of fish schools, Journal of Theoretical Biology 156, 365 (1992)

    1992

  23. [31]

    Sannomiya, H

    N. Sannomiya, H. Nakamine, and K. Matuda, Application of system theory to modeling of fish behavior, December , 0 (1990). 27

    1990

  24. [32]

    Terzopoulos, X

    D. Terzopoulos, X. Tu, and R. Grzeszczuk, Artificial fishes: Autonomous locomotion, perception, behavior, and learning in a simulated physical world, Artificial Life 1, 327 (1994)

    1994

  25. [33]

    Czirok, H

    A. Czirok, H. E. Stanley, and T. Vicsek, Spontaneously ordered motion of self-propelled particles, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 30, 1375 (1997)

    1997

  26. [34]

    Vabø and L

    R. Vabø and L. Nøttestad, An individual based model of fish school reactions: predicting antipredator behaviour as observed in nature, Fisheries Oceanography 6, 155 (1997)

    1997

  27. [35]

    I. D. Couzin, J. Krause, R. James, G. D. Ruxton, and N. R. Franks, Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups, Journal of Theoretical Biology 218, 1 (2002)

    2002

  28. [36]

    Takagi, Y

    T. Takagi, Y. Moritomi, J. Iwata, H. Nakamine, and N. Sannomiya, Mathematical model of fish schooling behaviour in a set-net, ICES Journal of Marine Science 61, 1214 (2004)

    2004

  29. [37]

    D. S. Calovi, U. Lopez, S. Ngo, C. Sire, H. Chat´ e, and G. Theraulaz, Swarming, schooling, milling: Phase diagram of a data-driven fish school model, New Journal of Physics 16, 10.1088/1367-2630/16/1/015026 (2014)

    2014 doi

  30. [38]

    X. Wang, S. Liu, Y. Yu, S. Yue, Y. Liu, F. Zhang, and Y. Lin, Modeling collective motion for fish schooling via multi-agent reinforcement learning, Ecological Modelling 477, 110259 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    W. C. Witt, L. Wen, and G. V. Lauder, Hydrodynamics of c-start escape responses of fish as studied with simple physical models, Integrative and comparative biology 55, 728 (2015)

    2015

  32. [40]

    W¨ ohl and S

    S. W¨ ohl and S. Schuster, The predictive start of hunting archer fish: a flexible and precise motor pattern performed with the kinematics of an escape c-start, Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 311 (2007)

    2007

  33. [41]

    Bainbridge, The speed of swimming of fish as related to size and to the frequency and amplitude of the tail beat, Journal of Experimental Biology 35, 109 (1958)

    R. Bainbridge, The speed of swimming of fish as related to size and to the frequency and amplitude of the tail beat, Journal of Experimental Biology 35, 109 (1958)

    1958

  34. [42]

    Mittal, H

    R. Mittal, H. Dong, M. Bozkurttas, F. Najjar, A. Vargas, and A. Von Loebbecke, A versatile sharp interface immersed boundary method for incompressible flows with complex boundaries, Journal of computational physics 227, 4825 (2008)

    2008

  35. [43]

    Solano, C

    T. Solano, C. Ni, R. Mittal, and K. Shoele, Perimeter leakage of face masks and its effect on the mask’s efficacy, Physics of Fluids 34, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0086320 (2022)

    2022 doi

  36. [44]

    Lopez, J

    U. Lopez, J. Gautrais, I. D. Couzin, and G. Theraulaz, From behavioural analyses to models of collective motion in fish schools, Interface Focus 2, 693 (2012)

    2012

  37. [45]

    H. Dong, R. Mittal, and F. M. Najjar, Wake topology and hydrodynamic performance of low-aspect-ratio flapping foils, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 566, 10.1017/S002211200600190X (2006)

    2006 doi

  38. [46]

    J. P. Newman and H. Sayama, Effect of sensory blind zones on milling behavior in a dynamic self-propelled particle model, Phys. Rev. E 78, 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.011913 (2008)

    2008 doi

  39. [47]

    A. K. Zienkiewicz, F. Ladu, D. A. W. Barton, M. Porfiri, and M. D. Bernardo, Data-driven modelling of social forces and collective behaviour in zebrafish, Journal of Theoretical Biology 443, 39 (2018)

    2018

  40. [48]

    Y. Katz, K. Tunstrøm, C. C. Ioannou, C. Huepe, and I. D. Couzin, Inferring the structure and dynamics of interactions in schooling fish, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 18720 (2011)

    2011

  41. [49]

    J. E. Herbert-Read, A. Perna, R. P. Mann, T. M. Schaerf, D. J. Sumpter, and A. J. Ward, Inferring the rules of interaction of shoaling fish, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 18726 (2011)

    2011

  42. [50]

    Escobedo, V

    R. Escobedo, V. Lecheval, V. Papaspyros, F. Bonnet, F. Mondada, C. Sire, and G. Theraulaz, A data-driven method for reconstructing and modelling social interactions in moving animal groups: Reconstructing social interactions, Philosophical 28 Transactions of the Royal Society ...

    2020

  43. [51]

    J. K. Parrish, S. V. Viscido, and D. Gr¨ unbaum, Self-organized fish schools: An examination of emergent properties, Biological Bulletin 202, 296 (2002)

    2002

  44. [52]

    Gautrais, F

    J. Gautrais, F. Ginelli, R. Fournier, S. Blanco, M. Soria, H. Chat´ e, and G. Theraulaz, Deciphering interactions in moving animal groups, PLOS Computational Biology 8, e1002678 (2012)

    2012

  45. [53]

    Tunstr¨ om, Y

    K. Tunstr¨ om, Y. Katz, C. C. Ioannou, C. Huepe, M. J. Lutz, and I. D. Couzin, Collective states, multistability and transitional behavior in schooling fish, PLoS Computational Biology 9, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002915 (2013)

    2013 doi

  46. [54]

    I. T. Jollife and J. Cadima, Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 374, 10.1098/rsta.2015.0202 (2016)

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.