Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 36 references

On Emergent Directions in Weakly Coupled, Large N$_c$ $\mathcal{N}=1$ SYM

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Mass-deformed large-N super-Yang-Mills on a small circle is equivalent, at long distances, to a scalar field on an emergent curved spacetime, with the curvature turning on at an analytically determined critical fermion mass.

desk verdict Mass-deformed emergent dimension is a real new result, but the z=1 flat phase claim is overstated and the boundary treatment does not yet justify the S^1 compactification. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13436 v2 pith:XL6ZQU5I submitted 2024-11-20 hep-th

Baiyang Zhang , Aditya Dhumuntarao This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords emergentdimensionlargeNlimitcentersymmetryN=1supersymmetricYang-Millsdualphotonsmagneticbionsinstanton-monopolesphasetransition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Mass-deformed $N=1$ $SU(N)$ super-Yang-Mills on a small circle has a weakly coupled, semi-classically solvable large-$N$ limit in which the $N$ color directions form a discrete lattice. The paper shows that, in the abelian large-$N$ limit with one adjoint fermion, the long-range effective theory of dual photons is equivalent to a bosonic scalar field living on an emergent fourth spatial dimension: flat while center symmetry is unbroken, and conformally flat and $\mathbb{Z}_2$-symmetric once the fermion mass exceeds the critical value and center symmetry breaks. The transition is controlled by the competition between instanton-monopoles, magnetic bions, and neutral bions, and the critical mass is determined analytically at large $N$ as $c_m^{\mathrm{cr}} = 24/N^2$. The result is a tractable example of a higher-dimensional geometry emerging from a weakly coupled gauge theory, with the metric and geodesics computable in closed form.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the continuum limit of the discrete color lattice. The $N$ holonomy eigenvalues are treated as sites $i=1,\ldots,N$; at large $N$ the index becomes a continuous coordinate $x=i/N$, sums become $N\int_0^1 dx$, the constraint $\sum_i a_i=0$ is encoded by placing the $N$-th site in a Dirac delta function, and the non-perturbative holonomy potential reduces to a one-dimensional variational problem. Its solution $a(x)=\ln[(\tilde{c}/2)x(1-x)]$ fixes the eigenvalue profile, and the dual-photon kinetic terms, with site-to-site couplings $(\sigma_{i+1}-\sigma_i)^2$ and $(\sigma_{i+1}+\sigma_{i-1}-2\sigma_i)^2$, become $(\partial_y\sigma)^2$ and $(\partial_y^2\sigma)^2$; dropping the four-derivative term yields a covariant scalar action on the emergent metric. The critical value $\tilde{c}_{\mathrm{cr}}=24$ follows from comparing the large-$N$ vacuum energies of the broken and unbroken phases.

What would settle it

Minimize the exact $N$-site potential (equation (2.10) of the paper) for $N=1000$ and compare the ground-state profile $a_i$ near $i=1$ and $i=N$ with the continuum formula $a(x)=\ln[(\tilde{c}/2)x(1-x)]$; if the endpoint deviations are of order one rather than of order $1/N$, the continuum map and the emergent metric are not justified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the low-energy physics of mass-deformed $N=1$ $SU(N)$ super-Yang-Mills on $\mathbb{R}^3 \times S^1_L$, in the abelian large-$N$ limit with $N_f=1$ and an $N$-independent W-boson mass, is a scalar field on a curved emergent spacetime once the fermion mass exceeds a critical value. Below the critical mass the emergent dimension is flat. Above it, center symmetry breaks spontaneously and the emergent metric takes the form $ds^2 = f(y)\,\delta_{ij} dx^i dx^j + f(y)^{-1} dy^2$ with $f(y)^2 = (\tilde{c}/8)[1 - 4(y/\tilde{L} - 1/2)^2]$, a conformally flat, $\mathbb{Z}_2$-symmetric warped geometry; the four-derivative Lifshitz term is negligible in the window considered, so the two-derivative metric description is valid. The transition is first order, driven by the competition between bions and instanton-monopoles, and occurs at the large-$N$ critical value $\tilde{c}_{\mathrm{cr}} = 24$, i.e. $c_m^{\mathrm{cr}} = 24/N^2$, which matches the numerical minimization of the $N$-site potential reasonably for $N=3,\ldots,10$. In the broken phase the emergent dimension is no longer a homogeneous circle; it becomes an interval with $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry, and the paper shows the endpoint singularities are excluded from the continuum and can be identified to give a circle with a cusp.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the discrete color lattice can be faithfully replaced by a smooth continuum coordinate, with the last lattice site encoded as a delta function, even though the emergent metric becomes singular precisely where the continuum approximation is least trustworthy.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $m>m_{\mathrm{cr}}$ the dual photon is described by a two-derivative action on the curved space $\mathbb{R}^3\times(0,\tilde{L})$, so the long-range physics is geometric rather than a flat three-dimensional EFT.
  • The transition point is fixed analytically at large $N$ as $c_m^{\mathrm{cr}}=24/N^2$, and this formula reproduces the numerical critical masses for $N=3,\ldots,10$ within the paper's accuracy.
  • In the window $O(1/N^2)\lesssim m\lesssim O(1/N)$ the four-derivative Lifshitz term is negligible, so the metric description is the relevant one and higher-order corrections are suppressed.
  • A heavy adjoint test fermion follows geodesics of the emergent metric; the curvature singularities at the boundaries are excluded from the continuum, and the endpoints can be identified to restore a circle with a cusp.
  • If the transverse length scale is held fixed as $N\to\infty$, the emergent size scales as $\tilde{L}\sim N^2$, so the emergent dimension is parametrically large.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension would be to compute finite-$N$ corrections to the emergent metric using a discrete derivative on the color lattice; the singular endpoints likely correspond to boundary defects that such a correction would resolve.
  • The same continuum map should apply to gauge theories with several adjoint fermion flavors or other center-stabilized theories; one could test whether the critical mass there also scales as $N^{-2}$ up to logarithms.
  • Because the conformal factor $f(z)\propto\cos(2z/\tilde{L})$ is the profile of an optical medium, a direct lattice measurement of the dual-photon correlation function should reproduce the Green's function of the emergent metric, giving a sharp numerical test of the geometric equivalence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies mass-deformed N=1 SU(N) super Yang-Mills on R^3 x S^1_L in the abelian large-N limit with eta = N L Lambda fixed. Starting from the known nonperturbative holonomy potential (instanton-monopoles, magnetic bions, neutral bions), it uses a continuum approximation for the discrete color index to derive the holonomy profile a(y) = ln[(c~ / 2) y (1 - y)], the large-N critical value c~_cr = 24, and a dual-photon effective action whose kinetic coefficient f(y) is recast as a warped emergent metric ds^2 = f(y) delta_ij dx^i dx^j + f(y)^{-1} dy^2. The paper then studies geodesics, curvature, and the causal structure of this emergent spacetime. The central quantitative checks are Table 1, comparing the large-N critical mass with direct numerical minimization for N = 3..10, and Fig. 4, comparing analytical and numerical eigenvalue distributions.

Significance. If the derivation holds, the paper provides an analytically controlled, parameter-free large-N description of center-symmetry breaking in a weakly coupled gauge theory, extending the emergent-dimension picture of Cherman and Poppitz to massive adjoint fermions. The comparison with direct numerical minimization for N = 3..10 is a genuine and nontrivial check, and the explicit expression for the emergent metric opens the door to further studies of the effective geometry. The main caveat is that the exact claims about the boundary of the emergent dimension and the exact critical value c~_cr = 24 rest on a continuum approximation whose endpoint behavior is not controlled at the required precision.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2.2, Eqs. (2.21)-(2.28)] The derivation of the profile a(y) = ln[(c~/2) y (1-y)] and of c~_cr = 24 relies on replacing sums over the color index by integrals and on setting e^{a(0)} = 0 after dropping e^{-N S_a}. Near y = 0 the exact solution has a'(y) = 1/y - 1/(1-y), so the change in a over one lattice spacing is O(1), not O(1/N), and the continuum approximation is not under control precisely in the region that fixes c_3. The true discrete first-site value is e^{a_1} = (c~/2N)(1 - 1/N), which is O(1/N) rather than zero. Since the endpoints determine the singular behavior of the metric (3.3) and the S^1 identification in Section 3, the exact large-N value c~_cr = 24 and the precise endpoint geometry are not established by the present calculation; a matched asymptotic or systematic 1/N boundary treatment is needed.
  2. [Sec. 2.3, Eqs. (2.40)-(2.42)] The reduction from the full effective action to the two-derivative curved-scalar action requires the four-derivative bion term to be negligible. The paper's criterion is sqrt(c~) >> 1, but at the transition value c~_cr = 24 this is only sqrt(24) ~ 4.9, and on scales of order L~ the ratio of the four-derivative term to the two-derivative term near y = L~/2 is roughly g/c~ ~ 1/8. The truncation is therefore marginal at the very point where the exact critical value is claimed; the paper should estimate the size of the neglected term at c~ = 24 or state explicitly that the metric is leading-order in 1/sqrt(c~).
  3. [Sec. 3, Eqs. (3.3)-(3.6) and discussion after Eq. (3.19)] The paper states that the curvature singularities at y = 0 and y = L~ are excluded from the continuum manifold and later identifies the endpoints to obtain R^3 x S^1. An open interval cannot be compactified to a circle by identifying boundary points that are not part of the manifold, and the curvature singularities at those points remain in the identified space. The construction needs a precise statement of what is meant by the compactification: for example, whether the endpoints are added with a regularized metric, or whether the S^1 is understood as a singular quotient. Without such a statement, the topology claim R^3 x S^1 is not supported by the metric as written.
  4. [Sec. 3, Eqs. (3.1)-(3.3)] The curved-space form of the action is obtained by rewriting the integral of (∂φ)^2 + f(y)(∂_y φ)^2 as the action of a scalar on a curved background with ds^2 = f(y) delta_ij dx^i dx^j + f(y)^{-1} dy^2. This rewriting exists for any positive f(y), so the geometric description is a re-description rather than an independent prediction. The physical content is the computed coefficient f(y), and the geodesic and Penrose analyses are translations of that coefficient into geometric language. The paper should state this explicitly and avoid implying that the geometry is an independent emergent prediction.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'emergent spacial S1' should be 'emergent spatial S1'.
  2. [After Eq. (2.41)] The word 'irrelvant' should be 'irrelevant'.
  3. [Fig. 4(a) caption] The caption says 'at x ≲ 1 and x ≳ 1'; this appears to be a typo for the two ends of the interval, for example x ≲ 0 and x ≳ 1.
  4. [References] References [29] and [31] appear to cite the same paper (Poppitz, 'Notes on Confinement on R^3 x S^1', Symmetry 14 (2022) 180); please consolidate them.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Emergent metric is a self-definitional rewriting of the kinetic coefficient, but the profile, kinetic function, and critical mass are derived from the effective potential and matched to numerics.

  1. self definitional [Section 3, Eqs. (3.1)-(3.3)]
    "the curved background emerges by constructing the inverse metric gab by reading off the coefficients of the kinetic term together with demanding general covariance of the theory on M."

    The curved-space action in Eq. (3.1) is made equal to the two-derivative effective action in Eq. (3.2) by defining gab from the kinetic coefficients: g_yy = f(y)^{-1}, g_ii = f(y), and sqrt(|g|) = f(y). For any positive kinetic coefficient f(y), the same two-line manipulation produces a scalar field on some curved metric, so the 'emergent geometry' is a dictionary translation of the already-derived coefficient g(y), not an independent consequence. The underlying physics is not circular: the profile a(x), the kinetic function g(y), and the critical value c~_cr = 24 are obtained by minimizing the effective potential and are checked against independent numerical minimization in Table 1 and Fig. 4. The self-definitional step is therefore presentational rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The only structurally circular element is the geometric packaging: the warped metric in Eq. (3.3) is chosen so that the curved-space action reproduces the two-derivative effective action with coefficient f(y); any positive f(y) could be absorbed into a metric in the same way. I therefore do not count the 'emergent geometry' as an independent derivation. However, the paper's substantive results are not circular. The profile a(x)=ln[(c~/2)x(1-x)] follows from the Euler-Lagrange equation of the continuum effective potential, the endpoint constant c3 is fixed by the boundary terms, and the critical value c~_cr=24 is obtained by comparing V_broken and V_unbroken; no parameter is fitted to the quantity being predicted. The large-N results are benchmarked against independent numerical minimization of the full discrete potential (Table 1, Fig. 4). The continuum-lattice replacement e^{a_i+a_{i+1}} -> e^{2a(y)} and the Dirac-delta treatment of the N-th site are approximations whose endpoint failure is acknowledged (Fig. 4a, 'limitation of the continuum approximation method near the boundaries'), but that is a correctness/regime concern, not circularity. There are no load-bearing self-citations: the effective potential and the flat m=0 emergent-dimension framework are cited from external prior work, and the paper adds the mass deformation and warped phase on top of them. Accordingly I set the circularity score to 2: one self-definitional repackaging, with the central derivation intact and externally checked.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the effective potential imported from prior literature, the weak-coupling large-N parametric window, the continuum approximation of the color lattice, the neglect of the four-derivative term, and the decoupling of all modes except the dual photon. No free parameters are fitted to data in this paper; the critical mass is derived and then checked numerically.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Effective potential Vnp in Eq. (2.10) for the holonomy, including neutral bions, magnetic bions and monopole-instanton terms, is taken from prior work (Refs [23,33]).
    The central phase transition and profile derivation rely entirely on this expression; if its coefficients or signs are wrong, the critical mass and metric change.
  • domain assumption Weak-coupling abelian large-N regime: eta = N L Lambda held fixed and small, and m << eta^2/N so the perturbative contribution to the holonomy potential is negligible.
    Invoked around Eq. (2.11) and throughout; defines the parametric window in which the semi-classical calculation is claimed to be reliable.
  • ad hoc to paper Continuum approximation of the discrete color index: sums over i become N times an integral, e^{a_i+a_{i+1}} becomes e^{2a(y)}, and the N-th site is represented by a Dirac delta function to enforce the constraint.
    Used in Eq. (2.21) to obtain the Euler-Lagrange equation and the profile a(x) = ln[(tilde c/2)x(1-x)]; the paper itself notes the approximation breaks down near the boundaries (Fig. 4a).
  • ad hoc to paper The four-derivative bion term in Eq. (2.41) can be neglected, so the action reduces to a two-derivative scalar on a curved background.
    Justified only for sqrt(tilde c) >> 1 (text after Eq. 2.41); the metric interpretation depends on this truncation.
  • domain assumption In the mass-deformed theory the dual photon is the lightest mode; holonomy and gluino fluctuations are heavier for generic m, motivating an action containing only sigma.
    Section 2.3 states this and uses it to drop all other fields; if the dual photon is not the lightest, the effective geometry describes only a subsector.
invented entities (1)
  • Emergent spatial dimension of size L~ (y or z direction)
    purpose: Reinterprets the large-N color index as a continuous spatial coordinate on which the dual photon field depends; carries the warped metric ds^2 = f(y) delta dx^2 + f(y)^{-1}dy^2.
    This dimension is a re-description of the lattice of color indices, not a new physical degree of freedom; its profile is fixed by the holonomy solution, and no independent observable outside the low-energy EFT is proposed to verify the geometric interpretation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On Emergent Directions in Weakly Coupled, Large N$_c$ $\mathcal{N}=1$ SYM." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XL6ZQU5I

@misc{pith2026241113436,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On Emergent Directions in Weakly Coupled, Large N$_c$ $\mathcalN=1$ SYM},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XL6ZQU5I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13436}
}
abstract

The $SU(N)$ Yang-Mills theory compactified on $\mathbb{R}^3 \times S^1_L$ with small $L$ has many merits, for example the long range effective theory is weakly coupled and adopts rich topological structures, making it semi-classically solvable. Due to the $SU(N) \to U(1)^{N-1}$ symmetry breaking by gauge holonomy, the low-energy effective theory can be described in terms of unbroken $U(1)$ photons and gauge holonomy. With the addition of $N_f$ adjoint light fermions, the center symmetry breaking phase transition can be studied using the twisted partition function, i.e., fermions with periodic boundary conditions, which preserve the supersymmetry in the massless case. In this paper, we show that in the large-$N$ abelian limit with $N_f=1$ and an $N$-independent W-boson mass, the long-range $3$d effective theory can be regarded as a bosonic field theory in $4$d with an emergent spatial dimension. The emergent dimension is flat in the confining phase, but conformally flat in the center-symmetry broken phase with a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ reflection symmetry. The center symmetry breaking phase transition itself is due to the competition between instanton-monopoles, magnetic and neutral bions controlled by the fermion mass, whose critical value at the transition point is given analytically in the large $N$ limit.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions

    Gerard ’t Hooft. A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions. Nucl. Phys. B, 72:461, 1974

    work page 1974

  2. [2]

    Reduction of dynamical degrees of freedom in the large-iv gauge theory

    Tohru Eguchi and Hikaru Kawai. Reduction of dynamical degrees of freedom in the large-iv gauge theory. 48, 1982

    work page 1982

  3. [3]

    The quenched eguchi-kawai model, 1982

    Gyan Bhanot, Urs M Heller, and Herbert Neuberger. The quenched eguchi-kawai model, 1982

    work page 1982

  4. [4]

    Quenched eguchi-kawai model revisited

    Herbert Neuberger. Quenched eguchi-kawai model revisited. Physical Review D, 102, 11 2020

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Twisted-eguchi-kawai model: A reduced model for large-n lattice gauge theory, 1983

    A Gonzalez-Arroyo and M Okawa. Twisted-eguchi-kawai model: A reduced model for large-n lattice gauge theory, 1983

    work page 1983

  6. [6]

    Mithat ¨Unsal and Laurence G. Yaffe. Large-n volume independence in conformal and confining gauge theories. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2010, 2010

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    A quenched momentum prescription for large-n theories

    David J Gross I and Yoshihisa Kitazawa. A quenched momentum prescription for large-n theories. Nuclear Physics, 206:440–472, 1982. – 21 –

    work page 1982

  8. [8]

    Testing volume independence of su(n) pure gauge theories at large n

    Antonio Gonz´ alez-Arroyo and Masanori Okawa. Testing volume independence of su(n) pure gauge theories at large n. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2014, 2014

    work page 2014

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    Cohen, and Howard Georgi

    Nima Arkani-Hamed, Andrew G. Cohen, and Howard Georgi. (De)constructing dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 86:4757–4761, 2001

    2001

  2. [10]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity

    Juan Martin Maldacena. The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2:231–252, 1998

    1998

  3. [11]

    S. S. Gubser, Igor R. Klebanov, and Alexander M. Polyakov. Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory. Phys. Lett. B, 428:105–114, 1998

    1998

  4. [12]

    Anti-de Sitter space and holography

    Edward Witten. Anti-de Sitter space and holography. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2:253–291, 1998

    1998

  5. [13]

    Douglas and Stephen H

    Michael R. Douglas and Stephen H. Shenker. Dynamics of su(n) supersymmetric gauge theory. Nuclear Physics B, 447(2):271–296, 1995

    1995

  6. [14]

    Magnetic bion condensation: A new mechanism of confinement and mass gap in four dimensions

    Mithat ¨Unsal. Magnetic bion condensation: A new mechanism of confinement and mass gap in four dimensions. Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, 80, 9 2009

    2009

  7. [15]

    Emergent dimensions and branes from large- N confinement

    Aleksey Cherman and Erich Poppitz. Emergent dimensions and branes from large- N confinement. Phys. Rev. D, 94(12):125008, 2016

    2016

  8. [16]

    Gubser, Juan Martin Maldacena, Hirosi Ooguri, and Yaron Oz

    Ofer Aharony, Steven S. Gubser, Juan Martin Maldacena, Hirosi Ooguri, and Yaron Oz. Large N field theories, string theory and gravity. Phys. Rept., 323:183–386, 2000

    2000

  9. [17]

    Strings and QCD? In International Symposium on Black holes, Membranes, Wormholes and Superstrings, 6 1992

    Joseph Polchinski. Strings and QCD? In International Symposium on Black holes, Membranes, Wormholes and Superstrings, 6 1992

    1992

  10. [18]

    Girardello, M

    L. Girardello, M. Petrini, M. Porrati, and A. Zaffaroni. The Supergravity dual of N=1 superYang-Mills theory. Nucl. Phys. B, 569:451–469, 2000

    2000

  11. [19]

    The 10d Uplift of the GPPZ Solution

    Michela Petrini, Henning Samtleben, Stanislav Schmidt, and Kostas Skenderis. The 10d Uplift of the GPPZ Solution. JHEP, 07:026, 2018

    2018

  12. [20]

    Mithat ¨Unsal and Laurence G. Yaffe. Center-stabilized yang-mills theory: Confinement and large n volume independence. Phys. Rev. D, 78:065035, Sep 2008

    2008

  13. [21]

    Continuity, Deconfinement, and (Super) Yang-Mills Theory

    Erich Poppitz, Thomas Sch¨ afer, and Mithat Unsal. Continuity, Deconfinement, and (Super) Yang-Mills Theory. JHEP, 10:115, 2012

    2012

  14. [22]

    Anber and Tin Sulejmanpasic

    Mohamed M. Anber and Tin Sulejmanpasic. The renormalon diagram in gauge theories on R3 × S1. JHEP, 01:139, 2015

    2015

  15. [23]

    Universal mechanism of (semi-classical) deconfinement and theta-dependence for all simple groups

    Erich Poppitz, Thomas Sch¨ afer, and Mithat ¨Unsal. Universal mechanism of (semi-classical) deconfinement and theta-dependence for all simple groups. JHEP, 03:087, 2013

    2013

  16. [24]

    Anber and Erich Poppitz

    Mohamed M. Anber and Erich Poppitz. On the global structure of deformed Yang-Mills theory and QCD(adj) on R3 × S1. JHEP, 10:051, 2015

    2015

  17. [25]

    Michael Davies, Timothy J

    N. Michael Davies, Timothy J. Hollowood, and Valentin V. Khoze. Monopoles, affine algebras and the gluino condensate. J. Math. Phys., 44:3640–3656, 2003

    2003

  18. [26]

    Gauge dynamics and compactification to three-dimensions

    Nathan Seiberg and Edward Witten. Gauge dynamics and compactification to three-dimensions. In Conference on the Mathematical Beauty of Physics (In Memory of C. Itzykson), pages 333–366, 6 1996. – 22 –

    1996

  19. [27]

    Adiabatic continuity and confinement in supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory on the lattice

    Georg Bergner, Stefano Piemonte, and Mithat ¨Unsal. Adiabatic continuity and confinement in supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory on the lattice. JHEP, 11:092, 2018

    2018

  20. [28]

    Spectrum of trace deformed Yang-Mills theories

    Andreas Athenodorou, Marco Cardinali, and Massimo D’Elia. Spectrum of trace deformed Yang-Mills theories. Phys. Rev. D, 104(7):074510, 2021

    2021

  21. [29]

    Notes on Confinement on R3 × S1: From Yang–Mills, Super-Yang–Mills, and QCD (adj) to QCD(F)

    Erich Poppitz. Notes on Confinement on R3 × S1: From Yang–Mills, Super-Yang–Mills, and QCD (adj) to QCD(F). Symmetry, 14(1):180, 2022

    2022

  22. [30]

    Dualities in 2+1 Dimensions

    Carl Turner. Dualities in 2+1 Dimensions. PoS, Modave2018:001, 2019

    2019

  23. [31]

    Notes on confinement on r3 × s1: From yang–mills, super-yang–mills, and qcd (adj) to qcd(f)

    Erich Poppitz. Notes on confinement on r3 × s1: From yang–mills, super-yang–mills, and qcd (adj) to qcd(f). Symmetry, 14(1):180, Jan 2022

    2022

  24. [32]

    Gross, Robert D

    David J. Gross, Robert D. Pisarski, and Laurence G. Yaffe. Qcd and instantons at finite temperature. Rev. Mod. Phys., 53:43–80, Jan 1981

    1981

  25. [33]

    Universal mechanism of (semi-classical) deconfinement and θ-dependence for all simple groups

    Erich Poppitz, Thomas Sch¨ afer, and Mithat ¨Unsal. Universal mechanism of (semi-classical) deconfinement and θ-dependence for all simple groups. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2013(3), Mar 2013

    2013

  26. [34]

    Anber and Erich Poppitz

    Mohamed M. Anber and Erich Poppitz. Microscopic Structure of Magnetic Bions. JHEP, 06:136, 2011

    2011

  27. [35]

    Asymptotic properties of fields and space-times

    Roger Penrose. Asymptotic properties of fields and space-times. Phys. Rev. Lett., 10:66–68, Jan 1963

    1963

  28. [36]

    Skokov, and A

    Robert Pisarski, V. Skokov, and A. Tsvelik. A pedagogical introduction to the lifshitz regime. Universe, 5:48, 01 2019. – 23 –

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.