Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 66 references

New insight into quantifying vacancy distribution in self-ion irradiated tungsten: a combined experimental and computational study

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Tiny vacancy clusters invisible to TEM drive tungsten swelling

desk verdict Worth a serious read for the method, but the headline small-cluster concentrations are not identifiable from two scalars without synthetic-data validation. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13480 v1 pith:LPLGFFMI submitted 2024-11-20 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Zhiwei Hu , Jintong Wu , François Jomard , Fredric Granberg , Marie-France Barthe This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords vacancyclusterspositronannihilationspectroscopyDopplerbroadeningtwo-componentDFTsimulatedannealingtungstenirradiationradiationswellingoxygen-vacancycomplexes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that positron annihilation spectroscopy, combined with first-principles annihilation characteristics and a simulated-annealing trapping model, can recover the full vacancy-cluster size distribution in self-ion irradiated tungsten. Applied to samples irradiated at 500 and 700°C, the method reveals a population of small clusters (fewer than 20 vacancies, under about 0.85 nm) that transmission electron microscopy cannot see, at concentrations above $10^{25}$ $m^{-3}$. Adding these clusters raises the estimated irradiation-induced swelling by an order of magnitude relative to TEM-based estimates. The paper further argues that an oxygen-vacancy complex (O1-V1) must be included in the model to match the Doppler-broadening W parameter at high temperature.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the combination of (i) a library of Doppler-broadening S and W values for vacancy clusters V1–V65 and for the O1-V1 complex, computed with two-component density functional theory; (ii) a positron trapping model that relates measured S and W to the concentrations of these defects; and (iii) a simulated annealing algorithm that searches for a vacancy-cluster concentration distribution whose predicted S and W match experiment. The S-W plane is the working space: each defect type has a characteristic point, and the measured pair constrains the mixture.

What would settle it

A direct test would be to generate synthetic S and W values from a known vacancy distribution using the same trapping model, run the simulated annealing inversion, and check whether the recovered distribution matches the input; if many different distributions yield the same S and W, the reported small-cluster concentrations are not determined by the data.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that two scalar positron-annihilation parameters (S and W), measured on self-ion irradiated tungsten, can be inverted into a vacancy-cluster concentration distribution over cluster sizes V1 through V65, using a database of DFT-computed annihilation characteristics and a simulated-annealing fit to the positron trapping model. At room temperature the recovered distribution is dominated by single vacancies, consistent with MD and OKMC simulations. At 500 and 700°C the method uncovers a large concentration of small clusters below the TEM visibility threshold, and the total small-cluster concentration is an order of magnitude higher than the concentration of TEM-visible cavities. The authors conclude that TEM-based cavity counts miss most of the open volume created by irradiation at these temperatures, and that oxygen decoration of vacancies measurably shifts the annihilation signal.

Load-bearing premise

The inversion assumes that the measured pair of S and W values uniquely determines the vacancy cluster size distribution under the trapping model and the DFT library, without any test that different distributions cannot produce the same S and W.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, the PAS+DFT+SA method can be applied to other single-element metals and semiconductors to extract vacancy-cluster distributions beyond the three-to-four component limit of lifetime deconvolution.
  • Swelling estimates for tungsten at reactor-relevant temperatures would need upward revision because TEM-invisible small clusters carry a substantial fraction of the open volume.
  • The result implies that oxygen-vacancy complexes are a significant positron trap and should be included in models of high-temperature irradiation microstructure.
  • The discrepancy between OKMC and PAS-SA at 700°C suggests that OKMC models need impurity effects to reproduce small-cluster concentrations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method relies on the assumption that two measured scalars uniquely determine a high-dimensional distribution; a synthetic-data or identifiability study would strengthen confidence, but the paper does not provide one.
  • If extended to lifetime spectroscopy or to variable positron beam energy, the additional information could break degeneracies and test the uniqueness assumption.
  • The oxygen concentration inferred for O1-V1 complexes could be checked by atom probe tomography or by deliberate oxygen doping to see whether the S-W shift scales with oxygen content.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a method to extract vacancy-cluster size distributions in self-ion irradiated tungsten from positron annihilation Doppler-broadening S and W parameters, using TC-DFT calculated annihilation characteristics for V1–V65, a positron trapping model, and a simulated-annealing (SA) inversion. The method is applied to irradiations at room temperature, 500 °C, and 700 °C. At RT and 0.0085 dpa, the inferred distribution is ~99% V1, consistent with MD/OKMC. At 0.085 dpa RT and at high temperature, the method infers a substantial population of small clusters (<V20, ~0.85 nm) with concentrations exceeding 10^25 m^-3, and an O1-V1 complex is introduced to reproduce the high-temperature S-W data. The authors conclude that TEM-invisible small clusters raise the irradiation-induced swelling estimate by an order of magnitude relative to TEM-only estimates.

Significance. If the inversion were demonstrably reliable, the paper would offer a significant advance in PAS quantification: a path from two Doppler-broadening parameters to a full vacancy-cluster size distribution, with important implications for swelling estimates and for defect-impurity interactions in tungsten. The forward modeling is a genuine strength: the TC-DFT library for V1–V65 is systematic, the trapping-model forward calculation is standard, and the RT low-dose result (~99% V1) agrees with independent simulations. However, the central quantitative claims—the >10^25 m^-3 TEM-invisible small-cluster concentrations and the order-of-magnitude swelling revision—depend on an inverse problem that is severely underdetermined, and the manuscript provides no identifiability analysis, synthetic-data recovery test, or uncertainty quantification. As a result, the paper's headline conclusions are not currently supported by the evidence presented.

major comments (4)
  1. [High-temperature section (Fig. 3)] The inversion from the measured (S, W) pair to the 65+-component vacancy distribution is not identifiable. For each sample, S and W are two scalar population-weighted averages over the annihilation characteristics of all defect states; infinitely many distributions can yield the same or nearly the same (S, W) pair. The paper does not provide an identifiability analysis, a synthetic-data recovery test, or uncertainty quantification for the SA inversion. Consequently, the overlap of the SA-recomputed S-W values with the experimental points in Fig. 3 is a consistency check by construction, not a validation. This is directly load-bearing for the headline claim of >10^25 m^-3 TEM-invisible small clusters (<V20), because those concentrations are inferred from the residual S-W signal that cannot be uniquely attributed.
  2. [High-temperature section (O1-V1 state)] The authors state that the S and W values for the O1-V1 complex are 'approximate' and that the behavior of O_m-V_n complexes at high temperatures 'remains unclear.' Introducing this state adds at least three free parameters (its S, W, and concentration). The claim that O1-V1 is 'deemed necessary' rests on the residual W mismatch between the pure-vacancy model and experiment, but with such a flexible model, many alternative mixtures of small vacancy clusters and/or other impurity-vacancy complexes can absorb that residual. The paper does not quantify how the inferred small-cluster concentrations vary under plausible changes in the O1-V1 annihilation characteristics, so the necessity of O1-V1 and the associated concentration shifts are not established.
  3. [RT validation subsection] The validation at room temperature is partial only. At 0.0085 dpa, the PAS-SA result (~99% V1) agrees well with MD/OKMC. However, at 0.085 dpa, the PAS-SA distribution (V1 = 65% ± 32%, V2 = 28% ± 14%) differs substantially from MD (>80% V1) and OKMC (>90% V1), and the paper attributes this discrepancy to the specific trapping coefficients, which are themselves 'extrapolated from experimental data' and used as inputs to the inversion. Since the trapping coefficients are part of the inversion assumptions, the discrepancy undermines confidence in the inversion at the higher doses and temperatures where the main claims are made. The TEM comparison at high temperature constrains only clusters V20 and larger, not the small clusters (<V20) that are the focus of the paper. Thus the validations provided do not resolve the identifiability concern.
  4. [Swelling estimate (concluding paragraphs)] The revised swelling values (0.6 ± 0.3% at 500 °C and 0.6 ± 0.5% at 700 °C) are computed directly from the inferred small-cluster concentrations. Because those concentrations are not identifiable from the S-W data (as argued above), the swelling estimate and its error bars are not supported by the data. The quoted uncertainties reflect only the propagation of fitting variability within the SA algorithm, not the model degeneracy or the sensitivity to the approximate O1-V1 annihilation characteristics.
minor comments (5)
  1. [RT subsection] The sentence 'the 𝑳𝒆𝒇𝒇+ and consequently, the total trapping rate 𝑘𝑡𝑜𝑡 determination is less precise' is ungrammatical and should be rewritten for clarity.
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption does not explain how the '<20' bin is defined or how the diameter values (0.94, 1.15, 1.42 nm) map to the bin labels; please clarify the binning and the axis scales.
  3. [High-temperature section] The statement that adding O1-V1 'increases the concentration of each vacancy defect by a factor of about 2-3' is unexplained; if the total trapping rate is fixed, adding a trapping state should redistribute concentrations rather than multiply all of them.
  4. [Throughout] The paper uses 'concentration fraction' at RT and 'concentration' at high temperature; the distinction and the normalization procedure should be stated explicitly, especially since the abstract uses 'concentration' for both regimes.
  5. [Conclusion] The conclusion overstates the validation: 'validated against simulation results for room-temperature irradiation' is not accurate for the 0.085 dpa case, where the PAS-SA distribution differs markedly from MD and OKMC; the validation should be described as partial.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Fig. 3 overlap is a refitting identity, not validation: the SA distribution is fitted to the S-W pair and then recomputed to show agreement; the HT O1-V1 match repeats the loop after adding a state.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 'Vacancy defect distribution for irradiation at RT'; Fig. 3 comparison (main text)]
    "The S and W parameters were calculated from the PAS-SA vacancy distributions (see red open squares in Fig.3) and the results overlap the experimental data."

    The PAS-SA vacancy distribution is the output of a simulated-annealing inversion whose objective is to reproduce the experimental S and W values through the trapping model. Recomputing S and W from that fitted distribution and reporting that they overlap the experimental data is therefore a self-consistency identity enforced by the fit, not an independent confirmation. It cannot discriminate among the many 65-component vacancy distributions that the two scalars S and W are consistent with, so the specific small-cluster fractions derived from the fit are not independently evidenced by this figure.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 'Vacancy defect distribution for irradiation at high temperatures of 500 and 700 °C'; discussion of O1-V1 and Fig. 3]
    "Taking this new defect into account increases the concentration of each vacancy defect by a factor of about 2-3, reaching approximately 10^23 m^-3 at both 500 °C and 700 °C for the largest V clusters (> V20). Their total concentration becomes closer to the TEM results. Consequently, as shown in Fig.3, the corresponding S-W values approach experimental values. They coincide with the experimental PAS result at 500 °C, while a minor difference is still observed for 700 °C, which remains within the error bar."

    The O1-V1 state is inserted into the SA-trapping model and the inversion is rerun on the same experimental S-W data. The resulting overlap between calculated and experimental S-W is then presented as corroboration, but it is the same refitting loop as at RT with one extra fitted annihilation state whose S and W values the authors themselves call approximate. Because adding such a state enlarges the space of distributions compatible with the measured S-W pair, the improved agreement does not independently determine the reported concentrations of TEM-invisible small clusters or of O1-V1 complexes.

full rationale

The forward part of the chain is not circular: the DFT annihilation-characteristic library, the positron trapping model, and the experimental PAS/SIMS/TEM inputs are external to the inversion, and the comparisons with MD/OKMC at RT and with TEM for V20 and larger at high temperature provide genuine independent checks. The circularity is located in the validation loop that supports the headline claim. The SA algorithm fits a 65-plus-component vacancy distribution to two measured scalars per sample, S and W (plus, at high temperature, an added O1-V1 state); the paper then computes S-W from this fitted distribution and cites the overlap in Fig. 3 as confirmation. That overlap is enforced by construction, not a prediction, and the paper provides no identifiability, regularization, or synthetic-recovery analysis to show that the inferred <V20 concentrations (claimed to exceed 10^25 m^-3) are uniquely determined rather than one of many distributions consistent with the same scalar pair. The HT O1-V1 agreement is the same loop run with an added approximate state, so it does not independently validate the decomposition. Self-citations to prior DFT and PAS work by the same group are not scored as load-bearing because the annihilation characteristics are first-principles calculations with stated methods rather than fitted results from the present dataset. Score 6 reflects partial circularity: the central quantitative small-cluster claim reduces substantially to a refitting identity, while the paper retains independent content in the TEM forward-model residual (pointing to the existence of some TEM-invisible small-cluster population) and in the RT external comparisons.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The inversion relies on the completeness and accuracy of the DFT annihilation-characteristic library, the trapping model, extrapolated trapping coefficients, and, at high temperature, an O1-V1 state with approximate S/W values. The most important unproven premise is that two measured parameters uniquely determine the 65+ component distribution.

free parameters (3)
  • specific positron trapping coefficients for V_n clusters = not specified; extrapolated from experimental data
    Used to convert trapping rates to concentrations. The paper attributes some PAS-SA versus MD/OKMC differences at 0.085 dpa to these coefficients.
  • S-W calibration of TCDFT annihilation characteristics = not specified
    The paper notes TCDFT does not yield absolute S and W values, implying a scaling or offset is applied to map calculated values to the experimental Doppler scale.
  • O1-V1 S and W values = approximate, from TCDFT
    Added as an additional annihilation state at high temperature. The paper explicitly calls these values approximate and says other complexes may contribute.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The standard positron trapping model relating S and W to trapping rates at vacancy defects is valid for all V_n and O1-V1 in tungsten.
    Invoked throughout the analysis; see trapping model description and supplementary III.
  • domain assumption The two-component DFT annihilation characteristics for V_n (n=1-65) and O1-V1 form a complete and accurate library of positron annihilation states in irradiated tungsten.
    The inversion assumes no other positron trap contributes; the paper acknowledges other complexes cannot be ruled out.
  • ad hoc to paper The vacancy distribution is recoverable from the two measured parameters S and W.
    No identifiability or uniqueness analysis is provided for this inverse problem.
  • domain assumption Specific trapping coefficients extrapolated from experiment are valid for each V_n at all temperatures.
    The paper itself suggests these coefficients may explain discrepancies with simulations.
  • domain assumption V1 volume equals half a BCC unit cell of tungsten with lattice parameter about 0.315 nm, and cluster volume scales linearly with vacancy number.
    Used to convert cluster sizes to diameters for comparison with TEM cavity measurements.
  • domain assumption O1-V1 complexes form in sufficient concentration at 500 and 700 degrees C and act as positron traps with the computed annihilation characteristics.
    Inferred from the W-parameter residual; SIMS shows oxygen present, but no direct measurement of O1-V1 complexes is provided.
invented entities (1)
  • O1-V1 oxygen-vacancy complex as an additional positron trapping state independent evidence
    purpose: Improve agreement between calculated and experimental W parameter for high-temperature irradiation
    Not a new fundamental entity; it is known from prior literature and supported by SIMS oxygen concentration, but its S/W values are approximate and its inclusion is post hoc.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of New insight into quantifying vacancy distribution in self-ion irradiated tungsten: a combined experimental and computational study." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LPLGFFMI

@misc{pith2026241113480,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: New insight into quantifying vacancy distribution in self-ion irradiated tungsten: a combined experimental and computational study},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LPLGFFMI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13480}
}
abstract

In this work, we propose a new approach based on positron annihilation spectroscopy to estimate the concentration of vacancy-type defects induced by self-ion irradiation in tungsten at room temperature, 500, and 700{\deg}C. Using experimental and Two-component density functional theory calculated annihilation characteristics of various vacancy clusters V$_{n}$ ($n$=1-65) and a positron trapping model associated with the simulated annealing algorithm, vacancy cluster concentration distribution could be extracted from experimental data. The method was validated against simulation results for room-temperature irradiation and transmission electron microscopy observations for higher temperatures. After irradiation at 500 and 700{\deg}C, small clusters (<20 vacancies, ~0.85 nm) undetectable by TEM were unveiled, with concentrations exceeding 10$^{25}$ m$^{-3}$, significantly higher than the concentration of TEM-visible defects (10$^{24}$ m$^{-3}$). Moreover, incorporating an oxygen-vacancy complex is deemed necessary to accurately replicate experimental data in samples subjected to high-temperature irradiation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.13480 by the authors.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of S-W values estimated from MD, OKMC, TEM and PAS experimental data using two SA models for W self-damaged samples at about 0.085 dpa at RT [33], and 0.02 dpa at 500 °C, 700 °C [41]. The S-W values calculated from the vacancy cluster distribution detected by TEM, or calculated by OKMC, and MD are plotted in magenta, green, and orange, respectively. The theoretical S-W values for the different pure vacanc… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    IRRADIATION PERFORMANCE OF CLADDING AND STRUCTURAL STEELS IN LIQUID METAL REACTORS,

    F. A. GARNER, CHAPTER 6: “IRRADIATION PERFORMANCE OF CLADDING AND STRUCTURAL STEELS IN LIQUID METAL REACTORS,” VOL. 10A OF MATERIALS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY: A COMPREHENSIVE TREATMENT, VCH PUBLISHERS, 1994, PP. 419-543., IN: 1994: PP. 419–543

    work page 1994

  2. [2]

    Y. UEDA, T. SHIMADA, M. NISHIKAWA, IMPACTS OF CARBON IMPURITIES IN HYDROGEN PLASMAS ON TUNGSTEN BLISTERING, NUCL. FUSION 44 (2003) 62–

    work page 2003

  3. [3]

    UEDA, H.Y

    Y. UEDA, H.Y. PENG, H.T. LEE, N. OHNO, S. KAJITA, N. YOSHIDA, R. DOERNER, G. DE TEMMERMAN, V. ALIMOV, G. WRIGHT, HELIUM EFFECTS ON TUNGSTEN SURFACE MORPHOLOGY AND DEUTERIUM RETENTION, JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS 442 (2013) S267–S272. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.JNUCMAT.2012.10.023

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.10.023 2013

  4. [4]

    L. LIU, Y. ZHANG, H. FAN, D. LIU, C. NIU, L. CHENG, W. NI, THE EFFECT OF W FUZZ GROWTH ON D RETENTION IN POLYCRYSTALLINE W, JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS 539 (2020) 152327. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.JNUCMAT.2020.152327

    work page arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    BALDWIN, R.P

    M.J. BALDWIN, R.P. DOERNER, HELIUM INDUCED NANOSCOPIC MORPHOLOGY ON TUNGSTEN UNDER FUSION RELEVANT PLASMA CONDITIONS , NUCL. FUSION 48 (2008) 035001. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1088/0029-5515/48/3/035001

    work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/48/3/035001 2008

  6. [6]

    TAKAMURA, INITIAL STAGE OF FIBER-FORM NANOSTRUCTURE GROWTH ON REFRACTORY METAL SURFACES WITH HELIUM PLASMA IRRADIATION, PLASMA AND FUSION RESEARCH 9 (2014) 1302007–1302007

    S. TAKAMURA, INITIAL STAGE OF FIBER-FORM NANOSTRUCTURE GROWTH ON REFRACTORY METAL SURFACES WITH HELIUM PLASMA IRRADIATION, PLASMA AND FUSION RESEARCH 9 (2014) 1302007–1302007. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1585/PFR.9.1302007

    work page doi:10.1585/pfr.9.1302007 2014

  7. [7]

    Z. HU, Q. YANG, F. JOMARD, P. DESGARDIN, C. GENEVOIS, J. JOSEPH, P. OLSSON, T. JOURDAN, M.-F. BARTHE, REVEALING THE ROLE OF OXYGEN ON THE DEFECT EVOLUTION OF ELECTRON-IRRADIATED TUNGSTEN: A COMBINED EXPERIMENTAL AND SIMULATION STUDY, JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS 602 (2024) 155353. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.JNUCMAT.2024.155353

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    C. SONG, J. HOU, L. CHEN, C.S. LIU, X.-S. KONG, BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN THEORY AND EXPERIMENT IN VACANCY CONCENTRATION, C/N/O DIFFUSIVITY, AND DIVACANCY INTERACTION IN TUNGSTEN: ROLE OF VACANCY-C/N/O INTERACTION, ACTA MATERIALIA 263 (2024) 119516. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2023.119516

    arXiv 2024

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    LU, H.-B

    G.-H. LU, H.-B. ZHOU, C.S. BECQUART, A REVIEW OF MODELLING AND SIMULATION OF HYDROGEN BEHAVIOUR IN TUNGSTEN AT DIFFERENT SCALES, NUCL. FUSION 54 (2014) 086001. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1088/0029-5515/54/8/086001

    2014 doi

  2. [10]

    SELIM, POSITRON ANNIHILATION SPECTROSCOPY OF DEFECTS IN NUCLEAR AND IRRADIATED MATERIALS- A REVIEW, MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION 174 (2021) 110952

    F.A. SELIM, POSITRON ANNIHILATION SPECTROSCOPY OF DEFECTS IN NUCLEAR AND IRRADIATED MATERIALS- A REVIEW, MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION 174 (2021) 110952. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.MATCHAR.2021.110952

    2021

  3. [11]

    ČÍŽEK, CHARACTERIZATION OF LATTICE DEFECTS IN METALLIC MATERIALS BY POSITRON ANNIHILATION SPECTROSCOPY : A REVIEW, JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 34 (2018) 577–598

    J. ČÍŽEK, CHARACTERIZATION OF LATTICE DEFECTS IN METALLIC MATERIALS BY POSITRON ANNIHILATION SPECTROSCOPY : A REVIEW, JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 34 (2018) 577–598. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.JMST.2017.11.050

    2018 doi

  4. [12]

    SCHULTZ, K.G

    P.J. SCHULTZ, K.G. LYNN, INTERACTION OF POSITRON BEAMS WITH SURFACES, THIN FILMS, AND INTERFACES, REV. MOD. PHYS. 60 (1988) 701–779. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1103/REVMODPHYS.60.701

    1988 doi

  5. [13]

    HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.3254/978-1-61499-211-0-491

    HAUTOJÄRVI, CORBEL C., POSITRON SPECTROSCOPY OF DEFECTS IN METALS AND SEMICONDUCTORS, ENFI 125 (1995) 491–532. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.3254/978-1-61499-211-0-491

    1995 doi

  6. [14]

    LHUILLIER, M.F

    P.E. LHUILLIER, M.F. BARTHE, P. DESGARDIN, W. EGGER, P. SPERR, POSITRON ANNIHILATION STUDIES ON THE NATURE AND THERMAL BEHAVIOUR OF IRRADIATION INDUCED DEFECTS IN TUNGSTEN, PHYS. STATUS SOLIDI (C) 6 (2009) 2329–2332. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1002/PSSC.200982114

    2009 doi

  7. [15]

    LHUILLIER, ETUDE DU COMPORTEMENT DE L’HELIUM ET DES DEFAUTS LACUNAIRES DANS LE TUNGSTENE, PHDTHESIS, UNIVERSITE D’ORLEANS, 2010

    P.-E. LHUILLIER, ETUDE DU COMPORTEMENT DE L’HELIUM ET DES DEFAUTS LACUNAIRES DANS LE TUNGSTENE, PHDTHESIS, UNIVERSITE D’ORLEANS, 2010. HTTPS://TEL.ARCHIVES-OUVERTES.FR/TEL-00587482 (ACCESSED JANUARY 7, 2021)

    2010

  8. [16]

    DEBELLE, M.F

    A. DEBELLE, M.F. BARTHE, T. SAUVAGE, FIRST TEMPERATURE STAGE EVOLUTION OF IRRADIATION-INDUCED DEFECTS IN TUNGSTEN STUDIED BY POSITRON ANNIHILATION SPECTROSCOPY, JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS 376 (2008) 216–221. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.JNUCMAT.2008.03.002

    2008 doi

  9. [17]

    HAKALA, M.J

    M. HAKALA, M.J. PUSKA, R.M. NIEMINEN, MOMENTUM DISTRIBUTIONS OF ELECTRON-POSITRON PAIRS ANNIHILATING AT VACANCY CLUSTERS IN SI, PHYS. REV. B 57 (1998) 7621–7627. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1103/PHYSREVB.57.7621

    1998 doi

  10. [18]

    PUSKA, R.M

    M.J. PUSKA, R.M. NIEMINENT, DEFECT SPECTROSCOPY WITH POSITRONS: A GENERAL CALCULATIONAL METHOD, (N.D.) 15

  11. [19]

    Q. YANG, X. CAO, B. WANG, P. WANG, P. OLSSON, SYSTEMATIC INVESTIGATION OF POSITRON ANNIHILATION IN TRANSITION METALS FROM FIRST PRINCIPLES, PHYS. REV. B 108 (2023) 104113. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1103/PHYSREVB.108.104113

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    MAKKONEN, M

    I. MAKKONEN, M. HAKALA, M.J. PUSKA, MODELING THE MOMENTUM DISTRIBUTIONS OF ANNIHILATING ELECTRON-POSITRON PAIRS IN SOLIDS, PHYS. REV. B 73 (2006) 035103. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1103/PHYSREVB.73.035103

    2006 doi

  13. [21]

    Q. YANG, Z. HU, I. MAKKONEN, P. DESGARDIN, W. EGGER, M.-F. BARTHE, P. OLSSON, A COMBINED EXPERIMENTAL AND THEORETICAL STUDY OF SMALL AND LARGE VACANCY CLUSTERS IN TUNGSTEN, JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS 571 (2022) 154019. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.JNUCMAT.2022.154019

    2022

  14. [22]

    ELSAYED, T.E.M

    M. ELSAYED, T.E.M. STAAB, J. ČÍŽEK, R. KRAUSE-REHBERG, MONOVACANCY-HYDROGEN INTERACTION IN PURE ALUMINUM: EXPERIMENTAL AND AB-INITIO THEORETICAL POSITRON ANNIHILATION STUDY, ACTA MATERIALIA 248 (2023) 118770. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2023.118770

    2023

  15. [23]

    SELIM, F

    F. SELIM, F. GRANBERG, S. AGARWAL, D. KAOUMI, J. COOPER, M. BUTTERLING, M. LIEDKE, E. HIRSCHMANN, J. BALDWIN, N. LI, Y. WANG, A. WAGNER, B. UBERUAGA, RECOVERY OF RADIATION INDUCED DEFECTS VIA NANOVOIDS IN BULK PURE FE, IN REVIEW, 2023. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.21203/RS.3.RS- 3381892/V1

    2023 doi

  16. [24]

    KEEBLE, J

    D.J. KEEBLE, J. WIKTOR, S.K. PATHAK, L.J. PHILLIPS, M. DICKMANN, K. DUROSE, H.J. SNAITH, W. EGGER, IDENTIFICATION OF LEAD VACANCY DEFECTS IN LEAD HALIDE PEROVSKITES, NAT COMMUN 12 (2021) 5566. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1038/S41467-021-25937-1

    2021 doi

  17. [25]

    WIELUŃSKA-KUŚ, M

    B. WIELUŃSKA-KUŚ, M. DICKMANN, W. EGGER, M. ZIBROV, Ł. CIUPIŃSKI, POSITRON LIFETIME STUDY OF ION-IRRADIATED TUNGSTEN: ION TYPE AND DOSE EFFECTS, NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND ENERGY (2024) 101610. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.NME.2024.101610

    2024

  18. [26]

    KRAUSE-REHBERG, H.S

    R. KRAUSE-REHBERG, H.S. LEIPNER, POSITRON ANNIHILATION IN SEMICONDUCTORS: DEFECT STUDIES, SPRINGER-VERLAG, BERLIN HEIDELBERG, 1999. HTTP://WWW.SPRINGER.COM/GP/BOOK/9783540643715 (ACCESSED OCTOBER 19, 2021)

    1999

  19. [27]

    VAN LAARHOVEN, E.H.L

    P.J.M. VAN LAARHOVEN, E.H.L. AARTS, SIMULATED ANNEALING, IN: P.J.M. VAN LAARHOVEN, E.H.L. AARTS (EDS.), SIMULATED ANNEALING: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, SPRINGER NETHERLANDS, DORDRECHT, 1987: PP. 7–15. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1007/978-94-015-7744-1_2

    1987 doi

  20. [28]

    X. YI, M.L. JENKINS, M.A. KIRK, Z. ZHOU, S.G. ROBERTS, IN-SITU TEM STUDIES OF 150 KEV W+ ION IRRADIATED W AND W-ALLOYS: DAMAGE PRODUCTION AND MICROSTRUCTURAL EVOLUTION, ACTA MATERIALIA 112 (2016) 105–120. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2016.03.051

    2016 doi

  21. [29]

    X. YI, M.L. JENKINS, K. HATTAR, P.D. EDMONDSON, S.G. ROBERTS, CHARACTERISATION OF RADIATION DAMAGE IN W AND W-BASED ALLOYS FROM 2 MEV SELF-ION NEAR-BULK IMPLANTATIONS, ACTA MATERIALIA 92 (2015) 163–177. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2015.04.015

    2015 doi

  22. [30]

    DE BACKER, A

    A. DE BACKER, A. SOUIDI, E.A. HODILLE, E. AUTISSIER, C. GENEVOIS, F. HADDAD, A. DELLA NOCE, C. DOMAIN, C.S. BECQUART, M.-F. BARTHE, READDRESSING NANOCAVITY DIFFUSION IN TUNGSTEN, FRONTIERS IN NUCLEAR ENGINEERING 2 (2023). HTTPS://WWW.FRONTIERSIN.ORG/ARTICLES/10.3389/FNUEN.2023...

    2023

  23. [31]

    J. WU, D.R. MASON, F. GRANBERG, ATOMISTIC STUDY OF IRRADIATION-INDUCED PLASTIC AND LATTICE STRAIN IN TUNGSTEN, (2023). HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.48550/ARXIV.2310.12923

    2023 doi arXiv

  24. [32]

    MARTIN-BRAGADO, A

    I. MARTIN-BRAGADO, A. RIVERA, G. VALLES, J.L. GOMEZ-SELLES, M.J. CATURLA, MMONCA: AN OBJECT KINETIC MONTE CARLO SIMULATOR FOR DAMAGE IRRADIATION EVOLUTION AND DEFECT DIFFUSION, COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS 184 (2013) 2703–2710. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.CPC.2013.07.011

    2013 doi

  25. [33]

    HOLLINGSWORTH, M.-F

    A. HOLLINGSWORTH, M.-F. BARTHE, M.Y. LAVRENTIEV, P.M. DERLET, S.L. DUDAREV, D.R. MASON, Z. HU, P. DESGARDIN, J. HESS, S. DAVIES, B. THOMAS, H. SALTER, E.F.J. SHELTON, K. HEINOLA, K. MIZOHATA, A. DE BACKER, A. BARON-WIECHEC, I. JEPU, Y. ZAYACHUK, A. WIDDOWSON, E. MESLIN, A. MOR...

    2022

  26. [34]

    BECQUART, C

    C.S. BECQUART, C. DOMAIN, AB INITIO CALCULATIONS ABOUT INTRINSIC POINT DEFECTS AND HE IN W, NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS AND METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B: BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS 255 (2007) 23–26. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.NIMB.2006.11.006

    2007 doi

  27. [35]

    BOLEININGER, D.R

    M. BOLEININGER, D.R. MASON, A.E. SAND, S.L. DUDAREV, MICROSTRUCTURE OF A HEAVILY IRRADIATED METAL EXPOSED TO A SPECTRUM OF ATOMIC RECOILS, SCI REP 13 (2023) 1684. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1038/S41598-022-27087-W

    2023 doi

  28. [36]

    NORDLUND, HISTORICAL REVIEW OF COMPUTER SIMULATION OF RADIATION EFFECTS IN MATERIALS, JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS 520 (2019) 273–295

    K. NORDLUND, HISTORICAL REVIEW OF COMPUTER SIMULATION OF RADIATION EFFECTS IN MATERIALS, JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS 520 (2019) 273–295. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.JNUCMAT.2019.04.028

    2019 doi

  29. [37]

    J. WU, Z. XU, L. LIU, A. HARTMAIER, M. ROMMEL, K. NORDLUND, T. WANG, R. JANISCH, J. ZHAO, MD SIMULATION STUDY ON DEFECT EVOLUTION AND DOPING EFFICIENCY OF P-TYPE DOPING OF 3C-SIC BY AL ION IMPLANTATION WITH SUBSEQUENT ANNEALING, J. MATER. CHEM. C 9 (2021) 2258–2275. HTTPS://DO...

    2021 doi

  30. [38]

    WU, J.-P

    J. WU, J.-P. BALBUENA, Z. HU, V. JANTUNEN, M.-F. BARTHE, M.J. CATURLA, F. GRANBERG, HIGH-DOSE LONG-TIME DEFECT EVOLUTION IN TUNGSTEN STUDIED BY ATOMISTICALLY INFORMED OBJECT KINETIC MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS, (2024). HTTP://ARXIV.ORG/ABS/2409.15856 (ACCESSED OCTOBER 15, 2024)

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    FERRONI, X

    F. FERRONI, X. YI, K. ARAKAWA, S.P. FITZGERALD, P.D. EDMONDSON, S.G. ROBERTS, HIGH TEMPERATURE ANNEALING OF ION IRRADIATED TUNGSTEN, ACTA MATERIALIA 90 (2015) 380–393. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2015.01.067

    2015 doi

  32. [40]

    X. YI, M.L. JENKINS, M. BRICENO, S.G. ROBERTS, Z. ZHOU, M.A. KIRK, IN SITU STUDY OF SELF-ION IRRADIATION DAMAGE IN W AND W–5RE AT 500 °C, PHILOSOPHICAL MAGAZINE 93 (2013) 1715–1738. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1080/14786435.2012.754110

    2013

  33. [41]

    Z. HU, P. DESGARDIN, C. GENEVOIS, J. JOSEPH, B. DÉCAMPS, R. SCHÄUBLIN, M.-F. BARTHE, EFFECT OF PURITY ON THE VACANCY DEFECTS INDUCED IN SELF–IRRADIATED TUNGSTEN: A COMBINATION OF PAS AND TEM, JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS 556 (2021) 153175. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.JNUCMAT.2021.153175

    2021

  34. [42]

    YABUUCHI, M

    A. YABUUCHI, M. TANAKA, A. KINOMURA, SHORT POSITRON LIFETIME AT VACANCIES OBSERVED IN ELECTRON-IRRADIATED TUNGSTEN: EXPERIMENTS AND FIRST-PRINCIPLES CALCULATIONS, JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS 542 (2020) 152473. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.JNUCMAT.2020.152473

    2020

  35. [43]

    YOU, X.-S

    Y.-W. YOU, X.-S. KONG, X.-B. WU, C.S. LIU, Q.F. FANG, J.L. CHEN, G.-N. LUO, INTERACTION OF CARBON, NITROGEN AND OXYGEN WITH VACANCIES AND SOLUTES IN TUNGSTEN, RSC ADV. 5 (2015) 23261–23270. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1039/C4RA13854F

    2015 doi

  36. [44]

    BAROUH, T

    C. BAROUH, T. SCHULER, C.-C. FU, T. JOURDAN, PREDICTING VACANCY-MEDIATED DIFFUSION OF INTERSTITIAL SOLUTES IN $\ENSUREMATH{\ALPHA}$-FE, PHYS. REV. B 92 (2015) 104102. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1103/PHYSREVB.92.104102

    2015 doi

  37. [45]

    BALBUENA, L

    J.P. BALBUENA, L. MALERBA, N. CASTIN, G. BONNY, M.J. CATURLA, AN OBJECT KINETIC MONTE CARLO METHOD TO MODEL PRECIPITATION AND SEGREGATION IN ALLOYS UNDER IRRADIATION, JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS 557 (2021) 153236. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.JNUCMAT.2021.153236

    2021

  38. [46]

    BALBUENA, N

    J.P. BALBUENA, N. CASTIN, M.J. CATURLA, C. GUERRERO, L. MALERBA, C. ORTIZ, TITLE: CONDITIONS FOR OPTIMAL TRANSFERABILITY BETWEEN IONS AND NEUTRONS: MODELLING OUTCOME AND THEIR RELATION TO EXPERIMENTS, (N.D.)

  39. [47]

    PLIMPTON, FAST PARALLEL ALGORITHMS FOR SHORT-RANGE MOLECULAR DYNAMICS, JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS 117 (1995) 1–19

    S. PLIMPTON, FAST PARALLEL ALGORITHMS FOR SHORT-RANGE MOLECULAR DYNAMICS, JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS 117 (1995) 1–19. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1006/JCPH.1995.1039

    1995

  40. [48]

    NORDLUND, M

    K. NORDLUND, M. GHALY, R.S. AVERBACK, M. CATURLA, T. DIAZ DE LA RUBIA, J. TARUS, DEFECT PRODUCTION IN COLLISION CASCADES IN ELEMENTAL SEMICONDUCTORS AND FCC METALS, PHYS. REV. B 57 (1998) 7556–7570. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1103/PHYSREVB.57.7556

    1998 doi

  41. [49]

    NORDLUND, MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION OF ION RANGES IN THE 1–100 KEV ENERGY RANGE, COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE 3 (1995) 448–456

    K. NORDLUND, MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION OF ION RANGES IN THE 1–100 KEV ENERGY RANGE, COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE 3 (1995) 448–456. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/0927-0256(94)00085-Q

    1995 doi

  42. [50]

    MASON, D

    D. MASON, D. NGUYEN-MANH, V. LINDBLAD, F. GRANBERG, M. LAVRENTIEV, AN EMPIRICAL POTENTIAL FOR SIMULATING HYDROGEN ISOTOPE RETENTION IN HIGHLY IRRADIATED TUNGSTEN, 2023

    2023

  43. [51]

    ZIEGLER, SRIM-2003, NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS AND METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B: BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS 219–220 (2004) 1027–1036

    J.F. ZIEGLER, SRIM-2003, NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS AND METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B: BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS 219–220 (2004) 1027–1036. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.NIMB.2004.01.208

    2004 doi

  44. [52]

    SAND, S.L

    A.E. SAND, S.L. DUDAREV, K. NORDLUND, HIGH-ENERGY COLLISION CASCADES IN TUNGSTEN: DISLOCATION LOOPS STRUCTURE AND CLUSTERING SCALING LAWS, EPL 103 (2013) 46003. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1209/0295-5075/103/46003

    2013 doi

  45. [53]

    LI, Y.-H

    Z.-Z. LI, Y.-H. LI, D. TERENTYEV, N. CASTIN, A. BAKAEV, G. BONNY, Z. YANG, L. LIANG, H.-B. ZHOU, F. GAO, G.-H. LU, INVESTIGATING THE FORMATION MECHANISM OF VOID LATTICE IN TUNGSTEN UNDER NEUTRON IRRADIATION: FROM COLLISION CASCADES TO ORDERED NANOVOIDS, ACTA MATERIALIA 219 (20...

    2021

  46. [54]

    MALERBA, C.S

    L. MALERBA, C.S. BECQUART, C. DOMAIN, OBJECT KINETIC MONTE CARLO STUDY OF SINK STRENGTHS, JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS 360 (2007) 159–169. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.JNUCMAT.2006.10.002

    2007 doi

  47. [55]

    MASON, D

    D.R. MASON, D. NGUYEN-MANH, M.-C. MARINICA, R. ALEXANDER, A.E. SAND, S.L. DUDAREV, RELAXATION VOLUMES OF MICROSCOPIC AND MESOSCOPIC IRRADIATION-INDUCED DEFECTS IN TUNGSTEN, JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS 126 (2019) 075112. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1063/1.5094852

    2019 doi

  48. [56]

    SIDIBE, ETUDE DU COMPORTEMENT DU TUNGSTENE SOUS IRRADIATION : APPLICATIONS AUX REACTEURS DE FUSION, PHDTHESIS, UNIVERSITE D’ORLEANS,

    M. SIDIBE, ETUDE DU COMPORTEMENT DU TUNGSTENE SOUS IRRADIATION : APPLICATIONS AUX REACTEURS DE FUSION, PHDTHESIS, UNIVERSITE D’ORLEANS,

  49. [57]

    NIEMINEN, J

    R.M. NIEMINEN, J. LAAKKONEN, POSITRON TRAPPING RATE INTO VACANCY CLUSTERS, APPL. PHYS. 20 (1979) 181–184. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1007/BF00885942

    1979 doi

  50. [58]

    GUPTA, R.W

    R.P. GUPTA, R.W. SIEGEL, POSITRON TRAPPING AND ANNIHILATION AT VACANCIES IN BCC REFRACTORY METALS, J. PHYS. F: MET. PHYS. 10 (1980) L7– L13. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1088/0305-4608/10/1/002

    1980 doi

  51. [59]

    BRANDT, R

    W. BRANDT, R. PAULIN, POSITRON DIFFUSION IN SOLIDS, PHYS. REV. B 5 (1972) 2430–2435. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1103/PHYSREVB.5.2430

    1972 doi

  52. [60]

    ZHOU, L.-P

    A.-H. ZHOU, L.-P. ZHU, B. HU, S. DENG, Y. SONG, H. QIU, S. PAN, TRAVELING-SALESMAN-PROBLEM ALGORITHM BASED ON SIMULATED ANNEALING AND GENE-EXPRESSION PROGRAMMING, INFORMATION 10 (2018) 7. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.3390/INFO10010007

    2018 doi

  53. [61]

    BHANOT, THE METROPOLIS ALGORITHM, REP

    G. BHANOT, THE METROPOLIS ALGORITHM, REP. PROG. PHYS. 51 (1988) 429. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1088/0034-4885/51/3/003

    1988 doi

  54. [62]

    EFRON, R.J

    B. EFRON, R.J. TIBSHIRANI, AN INTRODUCTION TO THE BOOTSTRAP, CRC PRESS, 1994

    1994

  55. [63]

    GORONDY-NOVAK, F

    S. GORONDY-NOVAK, F. JOMARD, F. PRIMA, H. LEFAIX-JEULAND, SIMS AS A NEW METHODOLOGY TO DEPTH PROFILE HELIUM IN AS-IMPLANTED AND ANNEALED PURE BCC METALS?, NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS AND METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B: BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS 398 (2017) 56–64...

    2017 doi

  56. [64]

    HU, L’EFFET DE LA PURETE SUR L’EVOLUTION DE LA MICROSTRUCTURE DU TUNGSTENE SOUS IRRADIATION, HTTP://WWW.THESES.FR (2022)

    Z. HU, L’EFFET DE LA PURETE SUR L’EVOLUTION DE LA MICROSTRUCTURE DU TUNGSTENE SOUS IRRADIATION, HTTP://WWW.THESES.FR (2022). HTTP://WWW.THESES.FR/S265136 (ACCESSED SEPTEMBER 15, 2022)

    2022

  57. [67]

    HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1088/0029-5515/44/1/007

    doi

  58. [2014]

    HTTPS://TEL.ARCHIVES-OUVERTES.FR/TEL-01068634 (ACCESSED JANUARY 7, 2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.