Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 51 references

Towards Linking Histological Changes to Liver Viscoelasticity: A Hybrid Analytical-Computational Micromechanics Approach

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A two-scale micromechanics model predicts how fat and collagen deposition alter liver storage and loss moduli, and argues that combining 100 Hz and 300 Hz elastography can separate fat content from fibrosis.

desk verdict Honest preliminary homogenization framework for liver viscoelasticity, but the key frequency-separation claim rests on an internally inconsistent rheological input. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13530 v3 pith:DXKWL5A6 submitted 2024-11-20 physics.bio-ph

Haritya Shah , Murthy N. Guddati This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.bio-ph
keywords liverviscoelasticitycomputationalhomogenizationsteatosisfibrosiselastographyhepaticlobulecollagenproportionateareafiniteelementmethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to build a quantitative bridge between histopathology and elastography—a noninvasive imaging technique that measures tissue stiffness—by predicting how fat and collagen deposition change the bulk viscoelastic shear modulus of liver tissue. It models the liver as a periodic array of hepatic lobules, converts local fat fraction into viscoelastic properties using classical composite-material theory, inserts collagen directly as stiff elastic regions, and homogenizes the resulting unit cell with finite elements. The predicted trends are that fat lowers the storage modulus (elastic stiffness), collagen raises it, and the loss modulus (viscous dissipation) responds differently at 100 Hz than at 300 Hz. The authors' most consequential claim is that combining 100 Hz and 300 Hz elastography measurements can infer both fat content and collagen proportionate area (CPA), whereas 100 Hz data alone leave the two confounded. The framework is explicitly preliminary and depends on assumed constitutive properties, but it gives a concrete, testable mechanism by which multifrequency elastography could read histology noninvasively.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is asymptotic-expansion homogenization (a mathematical averaging scheme that computes effective moduli from a periodic unit cell) applied to a rectangular cell made of four half-hexagonal hepatic lobules. Fat is represented through classical composite theory for heterogeneous viscoelastic media, which converts a local fat fraction into a local complex shear modulus; collagen is represented directly as purely elastic pixels with moduli in the 60 to 300 kPa range. The complex viscoelastic equations are split into real and imaginary parts so the finite-element software [30] can solve them, and the resulting heterogeneous storage and loss modulus distributions are homogenized at chosen frequencies. The deposition algorithms for fat and collagen are ad hoc and calibrated by visual matching to histology, but the homogenization step itself converts those patterns into effective bulk moduli.

What would settle it

Measure storage and loss shear modulus of liver samples (or in vivo liver) at 100 and 300 Hz with independently measured fat fraction and collagen proportionate area, and check whether the loss-modulus contours in Figure 9d reproduce; if loss modulus at 300 Hz does not separate fat from CPA, the dual-frequency inference claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's discovery is that a two-scale homogenization—analytical composite theory at the scale of fat droplets, computational asymptotic-expansion homogenization of a repeating lobule unit cell with explicit collagen—can reproduce the opposing signatures of steatosis and fibrosis: the storage modulus falls with fat content, rises with collagen proportionate area, while the loss modulus tracks frequency. At 100 Hz the loss moduli of fat and healthy liver are close, so the loss modulus carries almost no information about either fat or CPA; at 300 Hz the fat's loss modulus is assumed to overtake liver's, making the loss modulus sensitive to both. Consequently the pair (storage modulus, loss modulus) at 300 Hz can in principle separate fat content from fibrosis, while 100 Hz alone cannot. The paper presents this as a preliminary modeling result, conditional on the realism of the assumed constituent rheology and deposition patterns.

Load-bearing premise

The predictions hinge on assumed per-frequency complex shear moduli of healthy liver, fat, and collagen—notably that fat's loss modulus overtakes liver's between 100 and 300 Hz—and on ad hoc deposition patterns calibrated by eye; if true fat or liver viscosity differs, or if collagen is itself viscous, the frequency-based separation of fat from fibrosis could disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Simple steatosis can be tracked by a drop in storage modulus and an increase in relative viscosity (relaxation time), consistent with ex vivo softening of fatty liver.
  • Fibrosis stiffening depends not only on collagen proportionate area but also on the spatial pattern of collagen, with clear load paths causing accelerated stiffening above 10% CPA.
  • A relatively coarse finite-element mesh (40 by 80 elements) suffices to compute homogenized moduli, so many random microstructure realizations can be averaged at low cost.
  • Multi-frequency elastography—for example 100 and 300 Hz—may allow simultaneous inference of fat content and collagen proportionate area, which single-frequency measurements cannot separate.
  • The model establishes a first computational bridge from histology to elastography that can be extended by adding validated rheology, inertial effects at higher frequencies, and in vivo confinement or poroelastic effects.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not test the clinical protocol, but its frequency result suggests a concrete next experiment: acquiring elastography data at multiple frequencies in the same patients and checking whether measured storage/loss pairs invert into fat fraction and CPA.
  • The machinery is not liver-specific; a natural extension is to apply the same two-scale homogenization to muscle, pancreas, or other tissues where fat and collagen coexist.
  • If digitized histology were used to measure actual spatial statistics of fat and collagen instead of the ad hoc deposition algorithms, the framework could become patient-specific rather than illustrative.
  • The perfect-periodicity assumption could be tested by comparing homogenized moduli from real, disordered lobule geometry against the periodic-cell predictions; large differences would indicate that disorder itself is a confounding factor.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a two-scale micromechanical framework for predicting the viscoelastic shear moduli of liver tissue from microstructural features of steatosis and fibrosis. A periodic rectangular unit cell represents hepatic lobules; fat is homogenized at the sub-lobular scale using Christensen composite theory with an ad hoc spatial distribution, while collagen is inserted explicitly as a purely elastic material using a probabilistic deposition algorithm. Asymptotic expansion homogenization with finite elements is used to extract effective storage and loss moduli. Results are reported for steatosis, fibrosis, and combined steatosis/fibrosis at 100 Hz and 300 Hz, leading to the suggestion that multifrequency elastography may allow independent inference of fat content and collagen proportionate area.

Significance. If the quantitative predictions were reliable, the framework would be a valuable first bridge from histopathology to elastography biomarkers. The paper has real strengths: it is a forward homogenization computation with no inverse fitting, the finite-element/convergence checks in Sections 3.1.2 and 3.2.2 support the numerical implementation, and the qualitative trends (fat softens, collagen stiffens) are physically consistent. The authors also repeatedly and honestly flag the preliminary nature of their deposition generators and constituent properties. However, the quantitative and diagnostic conclusions rest on hand-set and partially inconsistent input rheologies, and the central 300 Hz separation claim is not yet supported by measured tissue properties or a sensitivity analysis. The paper is a promising methods contribution, but the load-bearing diagnostic observation in Section 4.3 needs substantial rework.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.1 and §4.3, Figures 6, 9, 10] There is an internal inconsistency in the fat loss modulus used to justify the 300 Hz analysis. Section 4.1 fixes fat viscosity at 0.4 Pa·s, which gives G''_fat = 0.25i kPa at 100 Hz, while Section 4.3 states that at 100 Hz the liver loss modulus (0.49i kPa) is 'quite close' to the fat loss modulus (0.5i kPa). These two values differ by a factor of two. Moreover, Figure 6a shows the effective loss modulus decreasing with fat content, which is consistent with G''_fat = 0.25i kPa, but Section 4.3 explains flat loss contours at 100 Hz by assuming fat and liver losses are nearly equal. The manuscript must correct this numerical inconsistency and reconcile the two sets of results before the claim that 100 Hz provides only one sensitive quantity can be sustained.
  2. [§4.3, power-law switch and 300 Hz sensitivity] The diagnostic conclusion that 300 Hz data allow independent inference of CPA and fat content depends entirely on the frequency-dependent loss moduli of fat and liver. The healthy-liver rheology is switched from Kelvin-Voigt with viscosity 0.8 Pa·s in Sections 4.1–4.2 to a power-law model with coefficient 800 Pa and exponent 0.15 in Section 4.3, with no sensitivity study. The 300 Hz separation arises because fat loss overtakes liver loss between 100 and 300 Hz under these particular assumptions; plausible variations in the liver power-law exponent or fat viscosity would erase the crossover. The claim should be accompanied by a sensitivity analysis over measured or literature-plausible ranges of the constituent complex moduli, or it should be explicitly labeled as an illustrative hypothesis rather than a general inference.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.2.2] The reported average moduli '4101 556i kPa' and '4064 555i kPa' are almost certainly missing decimal points; with a matrix shear modulus of 2 kPa and collagen modulus of 60 kPa, the homogenized values should be on the order of 4 kPa, not 4000 kPa. Please correct these numbers.
  2. [§3.2.1] In the sentence 'd is linearly interpolated form 0.75 mm at 5% CPA,' 'form' should be 'from'.
  3. [Figure 10 caption] The notation '1.9=2.1' and '7.9=8.1' should read '1.9–2.1' and '7.9–8.1'.
  4. [§2.3.2, Eq. (6)] The typeset formula for the homogenized modulus contains garbled notation (e.g., 'E k' and 'mn k'); please check the rendered equation for missing subscripts and superscripts.
  5. [General] Since the ad hoc deposition generators are central to the results, making the microstructure-generation code and the realizations available as supplementary material would improve reproducibility and allow readers to test the sensitivity of the conclusions to the generator parameters.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the homogenized moduli are forward outputs of prescribed constituent properties, with no fitted target, no load-bearing self-citation, and no prediction that reduces by construction to its inputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a forward micromechanical computation: choose hepatic lobule geometry, prescribe fat and collagen distributions, assign constituent viscoelastic moduli, and solve the asymptotic-expansion homogenization (AEH) problem, Eq. (6), to obtain effective storage and loss moduli. Nothing in this chain fits a parameter to the macroscopic moduli that are later reported as results. The fat distribution in Eq. (8) and the collagen deposition probability in Eq. (9) are ad hoc and calibrated by visual comparison to histological literature, not to the homogenized outputs, so the 'predictions' of storage/loss versus fat fraction and CPA are not statistically or algebraically forced by a fitted target. The use of Christensen composite theory, cited from Parker and Ormachea [16], is an input model for assigning local moduli; it does not presuppose the homogenized bulk modulus that the paper computes. Similarly, the frequency-dependent separation claim in Section 4.3 is a direct consequence of the assumed constituent loss moduli (fat viscosity 0.4 Pa·s; healthy-liver power-law coefficient 800 Pa with exponent 0.15). That makes the result sensitive to the rheological inputs, but it is not circular: altering the inputs changes the outputs, and no equation redefines the inputs in terms of the outputs. The paper explicitly labels its results preliminary and calls for validation with animal models and more precise collagen modulus, acknowledging that the predictive content depends on unvalidated assumptions. There is an internal numerical inconsistency worth noting as a correctness risk, not a circularity: Section 4.1 states fat G'' = 0.25i kPa at 100 Hz, while Section 4.3 states the fat loss modulus is 0.5i kPa; this affects the 100 Hz loss-modulus flatness explanation, but it is not a reduction of predictions to inputs. No load-bearing self-citations by the present authors appear; the cited supporting works [16, 21, 42] are independent external sources. Overall, the computation is self-contained as a forward homogenization study, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model has many hand-set inputs: fat-distribution boundary values, a Gaussian CDF shape, deposition spread parameters tuned by eye, and an uncertain collagen modulus. These are transparently disclosed. The qualitative trends are insensitive to some of them, but the quantitative viscoelastic predictions and especially the frequency-separation observation depend directly on the assumed loss moduli of fat, tissue, and collagen. No new physical entity is introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • V_in and V_out boundary fat fractions = Varied per simulation; not reported numerically
    Eq. 8 defines intralobular fat fraction as an interpolation between fat fraction near the central vein (V_in) and near the lobule boundary (V_out); these are set to hit a chosen average fat content and are never calibrated to histology.
  • Gaussian CDF shape parameters in fibrosis probability = mu = 2, sigma = 10
    Eq. 9 defines collagen deposition probability using a Gaussian CDF with fixed mean 2 and standard deviation 10; these shape the spatial decay without biological measurement.
  • Deposition spread parameter d interpolation endpoints = 0.75-1.4 mm at 1-5% CPA; 0.75-1.75 mm at 5-10%; 0.5-1.0 mm at 10-20%
    Section 3.2.1 states d is linearly interpolated based on CPA and the limits are chosen by trial and error to visually match histology images from Refs. [32-34].
  • Collagen shear modulus = Range 60-300 kPa; 60 kPa chosen for combined model
    Collagen modulus is not well known. Section 4.2 considers 60-300 kPa, and Section 3.3 fixes it at 60 kPa for the combined steatosis-fibrosis runs.
  • Fat distribution additive noise amplitude = 5% Gaussian noise
    Added ad hoc in Section 3.1.1 to represent random fat deposition; no reference or data is given for the 5% amplitude.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The liver is a perfectly periodic assembly of identical hepatic lobules, representable by a 0.86 mm by 1.5 mm rectangular unit cell.
    Section 2.3.3 reduces the liver to periodic lobules and the paper acknowledges actual livers have disorder, postulating that periodicity captures the main effects.
  • domain assumption Wave-based elastography operates in a linear viscoelastic regime with no poroelastic, nonlinear, or inertial effects at 100-300 Hz.
    Section 2.1 argues high frequency and small amplitude justify elastostatic linearized viscoelastic homogenization; this is a defensible simplification but unverified for fibrotic or cirrhotic tissue.
  • domain assumption A two-dimensional plane-strain representation of the lobule is sufficient.
    Section 2.3.3 lists reasons for 2D, but the error introduced by omitting 3D is not quantified.
  • standard math Christensen composite theory converts local fat fraction to effective viscoelastic modulus of hepatocyte tissue.
    Used in Section 3.1.1 following Parker and Ormachea [16]; the theory is assumed valid for spherical fat inclusions up to 50% fat content.
  • ad hoc to paper Ad hoc fat and collagen deposition algorithms produce representative microstructures that mimic histology.
    Eq. 8 and Eq. 9 are introduced ad hoc and calibrated by visual comparison to literature images, not by quantitative histology, as stated in Sections 3.1.1 and 3.2.1.
  • ad hoc to paper Collagen is purely elastic with zero intrinsic viscosity.
    Section 3.2.2 assigns collagen a purely elastic modulus, and this choice directly suppresses the loss-modulus response to CPA; the paper does not justify this rheologically.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Towards Linking Histological Changes to Liver Viscoelasticity: A Hybrid Analytical-Computational Micromechanics Approach." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DXKWL5A6

@misc{pith2026241113530,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Towards Linking Histological Changes to Liver Viscoelasticity: A Hybrid Analytical-Computational Micromechanics Approach},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DXKWL5A6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13530}
}
read the original abstract

Motivated by elastography that utilizes tissue mechanical properties as biomarkers for liver disease, with the eventual objective of quantitatively linking histopathology and bulk mechanical properties, we develop a micromechanical modeling approach to capture the effects of fat and collagen deposition in the liver. Specifically, we utilize computational homogenization to convert the microstructural changes in hepatic lobule to the effective viscoelastic modulus of the liver tissue, i.e., predict the bulk material properties by analyzing the deformation of repeating unit cell. The lipid and collagen deposition is simulated with the help of ad hoc algorithms informed by histological observations. Collagen deposition is directly included in the computational model, while composite material theory is used to convert fat content to the microscopic mechanical properties, which in turn is included in the computational model. The results illustrate the ability of the model to capture the effect of both fat and collagen deposition on the viscoelastic moduli and represents a step towards linking histopathological changes in the liver to its bulk mechanical properties, which can eventually provide insights for accurate diagnosis with elastography.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.13530 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Representative microstructure of the liver used in the current study (details of microstructure generation and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) A 2D hexagonal lattice with the rectangular repeating cell highlighted in red and (b) layout of hepatic lobules in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) fat distribution for Pattern 1 for average fat content of 16%; (b) resulting storage modulus distribution at 100 Hz; [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) fat distribution for Pattern 2 for average fat content of 16%; (b) resulting storage modulus distribution at 100 Hz; [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Realizations of two different patterns of collagen distribution inside a hepatic lobule with increasing CPA. Early [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) plot of viscoelastic shear moduli as a function of % fat. Red and blue represent Patterns 1 and 2 in Figures 3 and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) plot of viscoelastic shear moduli as a function of CPA. Blue and red represent Patterns 1 and 2 in Figure 5. Circles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Plots of changing storage modulus and relaxation time as a function of CPA, for different assumed shear modulus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Variation of storage modulus (kPa) and loss modulus (kPa) as a function of fat fraction and CPA fraction. (a,b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Cross-section of the contours in Figure 9. Storage modulus and loss modulus plotted as a variation of percent fat, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The fundamental premise is that disease causes microstructural changes, which in turn affects macroscopic tissue elasticity

    INTRODUCTION Elastography, either based on ultrasound (US) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), measures the elastic modulus of tissue, and uses it as a biomarker for various diseases including in the liver, such as liver fibrosis (see e.g., [1-4]). The fundamental premise is that disease causes microstructural changes, which in turn affects macroscopic t...

    work page

  2. [2]

    THEORY 2.1 Liver Structure and Physiology The mechanics and mechanobiology of the liver involve complex microstructure and physiological processes. Liver is composed of tree-like vasculature composed on large vessels (hepatic vein, hepatic arteries, portal vein and bile duct), branching multiple times to form smaller vessels (central vein and portal triad...

    work page

  3. [3]

    METHODS 3.1 Modeling Steatosis 3.1.1 Intralobular fat and viscoelasticity distribution To generate the distribution of viscoelastic modulus at the scale of multiple hepatocytes, we need to first generate spatial distribution of fat, mimicking the progression of steatosis in an actual liver. Since there has not been extensive quantitative analysis of fat d...

    work page

  4. [4]

    A total of 300 realizations are generated with fat content ranging from 0 to 40%, and AEH was applied at a forcing frequency of 100 Hz

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 4.1 Effect of Steatosis The procedure described in Section 3.1 is utilized to generate different realizations of fat content distributions on the unit cell, for varying overall fat content, for both Patterns 1 and 2. A total of 300 realizations are generated with fat content ranging from 0 to 40%, and AEH was applied at a forcing fr...

    work page

  5. [5]

    (b) same data, but with loss modulus replaced by effective relaxation time, i.e

    Circles represent storage moduli while dots represent loss moduli. (b) same data, but with loss modulus replaced by effective relaxation time, i.e. dots represent relaxation time. 12 As expected, the storage modulus decreases with increasing fat content, which is expected due to fluidity of fat droplets. This is consistent with ex vivo observations that i...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Figure 8 provides storage modulus and relaxation time as a function of CPA, for the other four assumed collagen moduli, i.e

    Circles represent storage moduli while dots represent loss moduli. Figure 8 provides storage modulus and relaxation time as a function of CPA, for the other four assumed collagen moduli, i.e. G’=120, 180, 240 and 270 kPa. It is evident that with an increasing CPA, the storage (shear) modulus increases and the relaxation time decreases. Moreover, for early...

    work page

  7. [7]

    CONCLUSIONS As a first step towards building a model that can link changes in the liver microstructure to its mechanical properties, we developed a computational modeling framework to capture the effects of fat and collagen deposition. The model is based on a computational homogenization approach that simulates the viscoelastic deformation of repeating re...

    work page

  8. [8]

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The work is partially funded by National Science Foundation grant DMS-2111234, and by National Institute of Health grant R01 HL145268. The content is solely the responsibility of authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Science Foundation, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, or the National ...

    work page

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 2003

    Sandrin, L., et al., Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 2003. 29(12): p. 1705-13

    2003

  2. [10]

    Glaser, J.A

    Yin, M., K.J. Glaser, J.A. Talwalkar, J. Chen, A. Manduca, and R.L. Ehman, Hepatic MR elastography: Clinical performance in a series of 1377 consecutive examinations. Radiology, 2015. 278(1): p. 114- 124

    2015

  3. [11]

    Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 2015

    Ferraioli, G., et al., WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 3: Liver. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 2015. 41(5): p. 1161-1179

    2015

  4. [12]

    Gennisson, T

    Muller, M., J.L. Gennisson, T. Deffieux, M. Tanter, and M. Fink, Quantitative viscoelasticity mapping of human liver using supersonic shear imaging: preliminary in vivo feasability study. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 2009. 35(2): p. 219-229

    2009

  5. [13]

    Radiology, 2017

    Yin, M., et al., Distinguishing between hepatic inflammation and fibrosis with MR elastography. Radiology, 2017. 284(3): p. 694-705

    2017

  6. [14]

    Am J Gastroenterol, 2016

    Loomba, R., et al., Novel 3D magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive diagnosis of advanced fibrosis in NAFLD: A prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol, 2016. 111(7): p. 986-994

    2016

  7. [15]

    European Radiology,

    Yin, Z., et al., Prediction of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity score (NAS) with multiparametric hepatic magnetic resonance imaging and elastography. European Radiology,

  8. [16]

    Parker, K.J. and J. Ormachea, The quantification of liver fat from wave speed and attenuation. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 2021. 66(14): p. 145011-145011

    2021

  9. [17]

    Hepatology Communications, 2020

    Allen, A.M., et al., Multiparametric magnetic resonance elastography improves the detection of NASH regression following bariatric surgery. Hepatology Communications, 2020. 4(2): p. 185-192

    2020

  10. [18]

    Hepatology, 2020

    Allen, A.M., et al., The role of three-dimensional magnetic resonance elastography in the diagnosis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Hepatology, 2020. 71(2): p. 510-521

    2020

  11. [19]

    Liu, J., Y. Ma, P. Han, J. Wang, Y.-g. Liu, R.-f. Shi, and J. Li, Hepatic steatosis leads to overestimation of liver stiffness measurement in both chronic hepatitis B and metabolic-associated fatty liver 17 disease patients. Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterol...

    2022

  12. [20]

    Kimondo, J.J., R.R. Said, J. Wu, C. Tian, and Z. Wu, Mechanical rheological model on the assessment of elasticity and viscosity in tissue inflammation: A systematic review. Plos one, 2024. 19(7): p. e0307113

    2024

  13. [21]

    Girshovitz, R

    Shoham, N., P. Girshovitz, R. Katzengold, N.T. Shaked, D. Benayahu, and A. Gefen, Adipocyte stiffness increases with accumulation of lipid droplets. Biophysical journal, 2014. 106(6): p. 1421- 1431

    2014

  14. [22]

    Journal of hepatology, 2010

    Caldwell, S., et al., Hepatocellular ballooning in NASH. Journal of hepatology, 2010. 53(4): p. 719- 723

    2010

  15. [23]

    Mitten, E.K. and G. Baffy, Mechanobiology in the development and progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: an updated review. Metabolism and Target Organ Damage, 2023. 3(1): p. 2

    2023

  16. [24]

    Ormachea, M.G

    Parker, K.J., J. Ormachea, M.G. Drage, H. Kim, and Z. Hah, The biomechanics of simple steatosis and steatohepatitis. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 2018. 63(10): p. 105013

    2018

  17. [25]

    Arndt, A

    Wex, C., S. Arndt, A. Stoll, C. Bruns, and Y. Kupriyanova, Isotropic incompressible hyperelastic models for modelling the mechanical behaviour of biological tissues: a review. Biomedical Engineering/Biomedizinische Technik, 2015. 60(6): p. 577-592

    2015

  18. [26]

    Medical Engineering & Physics, 2017

    Zhang, X., et al., Dynamic mechanical analysis to assess viscoelasticity of liver tissue in a rat model of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Medical Engineering & Physics, 2017. 44: p. 79-86

    2017

  19. [27]

    Radiology, 2011

    RL, C.J.T.J.Y.M.G.K.S.S.E., Early detection of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by using MR elastography. Radiology, 2011. 259(3): p. 749-56

    2011

  20. [28]

    Castelein, J

    Meyer, T., J. Castelein, J. Schattenfroh, A.S. Morr, R.V. da Silva, H. Tzschätzsch, R. Reiter, J. Guo, and I. Sack, Magnetic resonance elastography in a nutshell: Tomographic imaging of soft tissue viscoelasticity for detecting and staging disease with a focus on inflammation....

    2024

  21. [29]

    Radiology, 2024

    Sugimoto, K., et al., US markers and necroinflammation, steatosis, and fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease: the iLEAD study. Radiology, 2024. 312(2): p. e233377

    2024

  22. [30]

    Poul, S.S. and K.J. Parker, Fat and fibrosis as confounding cofactors in viscoelastic measurements of the liver. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 2021. 66(4): p. 045024

    2021

  23. [31]

    Wang, Y. and J. Jiang, Influence of tissue microstructure on shear wave speed measurements in plane shear wave elastography: a computational study in lossless fibrotic liver media. Ultrasonic Imaging, 2018. 40(1): p. 49-63

    2018

  24. [32]

    Jessen, M.F

    Ebrahem, A., E. Jessen, M.F. ten Eikelder, T. Gangwar, M. Mika, and D. Schillinger, Connecting continuum poroelasticity with discrete synthetic vascular trees for modelling liver tissue. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 2024. 480(2285): p. 20230421

    2024

  25. [33]

    Sugimoto, M

    Yoshizawa, M., M. Sugimoto, M. Tanaka, Y. Sakai, and M. Nishikawa, Computational simulation of liver fibrosis dynamics. Scientific reports, 2022. 12(1): p. 14112

    2022

  26. [34]

    Takasaki, H

    Hano, H., S. Takasaki, H. Kobayashi, T. Koyama, T. Lu, and K. Nagatsuma, In the non-cirrhotic stage of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, angioarchitecture of portal veins and lobular architecture are maintained. Virchows Archiv, 2013. 462: p. 533-540

    2013

  27. [35]

    Rani, H., T.W. Sheu, T. Chang, and P. Liang, Numerical investigation of non-Newtonian microcirculatory blood flow in hepatic lobule. Journal of biomechanics, 2006. 39(3): p. 551-563

    2006

  28. [36]

    Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1969

    Christensen, R., Viscoelastic properties of heterogeneous media. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1969. 17(1): p. 23-41

    1969

  29. [37]

    Tonks, K

    Hales, J., M. Tonks, K. Chockalingam, D. Perez, S. Novascone, B. Spencer, and R. Williamson, Asymptotic expansion homogenization for multiscale nuclear fuel analysis. Computational Materials Science, 2015. 99: p. 290-297. 18

    2015

  30. [38]

    2012: Dover Publications

    Hughes, T.J.R., The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis. 2012: Dover Publications. 1-704

    2012

  31. [39]

    SoftwareX,

    Giudicelli, G., et al., 3.0-MOOSE: Enabling massively parallel multiphysics simulations. SoftwareX,

  32. [40]

    JHEP Reports, 2024

    Khoury, M., et al., Glycogen synthase kinase 3 activity enhances liver inflammation in MASH. JHEP Reports, 2024. 6(6): p. 101073

    2024

  33. [41]

    62(2): p

    Amzolini, A.M., et al., Triglyceride and glucose index: a useful tool for non-alcoholic liver disease assessed by liver biopsy in patients with metabolic syndrome? Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology, 2021. 62(2): p. 475

    2021

  34. [42]

    Takasaki, Y

    Hano, H., S. Takasaki, Y. Endo, T. Harada, K. Komine, and Y. Koike, Histological reassessment of the role of bridging fibrosis in the angioarchitectural features associated with lobular distortion of the liver in chronic viral hepatitis. Hepatology Research, 2016. 46(3): p. E70-E78

    2016

  35. [44]

    Brunt, E.M. and D.G. Tiniakos, Histopathology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World journal of gastroenterology: WJG, 2010. 16(42): p. 5286

    2010

  36. [45]

    Wilson, D.E

    Chalasani, N., L. Wilson, D.E. Kleiner, O.W. Cummings, E.M. Brunt, A. Ünalp, and N.C.R. Network, Relationship of steatosis grade and zonal location to histological features of steatohepatitis in adult patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Journal of hepatology, 2008...

    2008

  37. [46]

    Kleiner, D.E. and H.R. Makhlouf, Histology of NAFLD and NASH in adults and children. Clinics in liver disease, 2015. 20(2): p. 293

    2015

  38. [47]

    Janmey, and R.G

    Li, D., P.A. Janmey, and R.G. Wells, Local fat content determines global and local stiffness in livers with simple steatosis. FASEB Bioadv, 2023. 5(6): p. 251-261

    2023

  39. [48]

    Wang, Y. and J. Jiang, A two-dimensional (2d) systems biology-based discrete liver tissue model: A simulation study with implications for ultrasound elastography of liver fibrosis. Computers in biology and medicine, 2019. 104: p. 227-234

    2019

  40. [49]

    Vesentini, A

    Gautieri, A., S. Vesentini, A. Redaelli, and M.J. Buehler, Hierarchical nanomechanics of collagen microfibrils. Nature Precedings, 2010: p. 1-1

    2010

  41. [50]

    Khamdaeng, T., J. Luo, J. Vappou, P. Terdtoon, and E. Konofagou, Arterial stiffness identification of the human carotid artery using the stress–strain relationship in vivo. Ultrasonics, 2012. 52(3): p. 402-411

    2012

  42. [51]

    Physics in Medicine & Biology, 2022

    Parker, K.J., Power laws prevail in medical ultrasound. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 2022. 67(9): p. 09TR02

    2022

  43. [2019]

    5823-5831

    29(11): p. 5823-5831

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.