Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 8 minor 59 references

Systematic Fluorination is a Powerful Design Strategy Towards Fluid Molecular Ferroelectrics

T0 review · 5 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Specific fluorination patterns, not maximal fluorination or dipole size, decide which liquid crystals form ferroelectric nematic phases; the controlling feature is how evenly the surface charge oscillates along the molecule.

desk verdict A genuinely useful 27-compound fluorination screen with a plausible Z=1 design trend, but the central 'oscillatory ESP' rule is still a qualitative after-the-fact descriptor rather than a testable criterion. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14115 v1 pith:SSBPGGFH submitted 2024-11-21 cond-mat.soft

Calum J. Gibb , Jordan Hobbs , Richard J. Mandle This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.soft
keywords ferroelectricnematicliquidcrystalfluorinationelectrostaticpotentialmoleculardesignpolarphaseantiferroelectricdensityfunctionaltheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Ferroelectric nematics are liquids that flow yet carry a macroscopic electric polarisation comparable to solid ferroelectrics, and this paper asks which molecular features actually favour that polar order. To answer, the authors synthesised all twenty-seven fluorination patterns of a biphenyl benzoate core and measured which ones form polar nematic or antiferroelectric nematic phases. The central finding is that maximal fluorination is not optimal: homologues bearing one fluorine on the outer benzoate ring (X.Y.1 patterns) show the highest polar-phase transition temperatures even though their dipole moments are smaller than those of more fluorinated analogues. Electronic-structure calculations trace this to the molecule's surface charge: when the radially averaged electrostatic potential along the long axis oscillates evenly between positive and negative regions, parallel neighbours pack more favourably and polar order is stabilised. A sympathetic reader would take this as a concrete design rule for future ferroelectric nematics: engineer the surface-charge pattern, not just the dipole moment.

What carries the argument

The central object is the molecule's longitudinal charge-density wave: the radially averaged electrostatic potential (ESP) plotted along the long molecular axis at an electron density isovalue of 0.0004, computed from DFT (B3LYP-GD3BJ/cc-pVTZ) geometries. This 1D reduction of the 3D ESP is the diagnostic that separates the polar-phase-forming homologues (uniform, near-sinusoidal oscillations) from the apolar ones (large, non-oscillatory charge variation). The argument is carried further by rigid bimolecular potential-energy scans, which map the complexation energy of two molecules translated over x/y/z in parallel and antiparallel orientations, and by Interaction Region Indicator (IRI) isosurfaces that visualise the non-covalent contacts; together they show offset π-π stacking dominates and that parallel packing offers multiple comparable-energy minima while antiparallel packing has repulsive regions.

What would settle it

Prepare a 2.2.1 analogue in which the outer-ring fluorine is moved from the position adjacent to the ester carbonyl to the opposite side of the benzoate ring; the spatial-uniformity model predicts a drop in T_NF-I, while a pure dipole-moment model predicts little change, so the comparison would separate the two mechanisms. Alternatively, compute the 1D ESP for known ferroelectric nematogens outside this scaffold and check whether the oscillation-uniformity ranking tracks which compounds actually form polar phases.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Against the expectation that more fluorination means a bigger dipole and therefore a more stable ferroelectric nematic phase, the paper reports that in a family of twenty-seven biphenyl benzoates the polar phases (NF and NX) appear only in the most fluorinated subset (1-9), and within that subset the most stable polar phases are not the most fluorinated molecules. Removing one fluorine from the outer benzoate ring to make the 2.2.1 homologue raises the NF-isotropic transition from a monotropic 133.5°C for 2.2.2 to an enantiotropic 145.4°C, while lowering the calculated dipole moment; the same X.Y.1 advantage repeats across the 2.2, 2.1 and 1.2 series. The authors' explanation is that the relevant molecular property is the 1D radially averaged electrostatic potential at the 0.0004 electron-density isosurface, which should oscillate uniformly along the long axis so that parallel side-by-side molecules see complementary positive and negative regions. DFT-based bimolecular potential-energy scans and Interaction Region Indicator analysis support the picture: antiparallel packing carries repulsive regions that the parallel arrangement avoids, the dominant interaction is offset π-π stacking rather than point-dipole attraction, and increased fluorination brings the parallel and antiparallel energy minima closer together. The paper's central claim is therefore that the propensity to form polar nematic phases is governed by the spatial uniformity of the surface-charge oscillation, not by the magnitude of the molecular dipole moment.

Load-bearing premise

The design rule rests on the assumption that a single molecule's computed surface charge, averaged around its long axis as if the molecule spins freely and ignores its neighbours, temperature, and shape changes, captures what actually stabilises polar order in the dense liquid.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Synthetic strategy: for this biphenyl benzoate scaffold, the X.Y.1 fluorination pattern is the target, not maximal fluorination, because it gives the highest polar-phase transition temperatures.
  • Prediction metric: the 1D radially averaged ESP plot can serve as a computational pre-screen for whether a candidate rod-like molecule is likely to form a polar nematic phase.
  • Phase control: single-fluorine edits switch materials between ferroelectric nematic (NF), antiferroelectric nematic (NX), and ordinary nematic (N), so the phase sequence is finely tunable.
  • Interaction picture: since offset π-π stacking rather than point-dipole attraction dominates the lateral interactions, design should optimise surface-charge complementarity rather than only adding polar groups.
  • Dipole de-emphasis: among chemically similar compounds, longitudinal dipole magnitude is not a reliable guide to polar-phase stability.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the surface-charge-oscillation rule transfers to other molecular cores, then screening candidate ferroelectric nematogens by the uniformity of their 1D ESP wave, without synthesising them first, could accelerate discovery of room-temperature NF materials; this is an inference, not a paper claim.
  • The paper assumes free rotation about the long axis when radially averaging the ESP, so the rule is most confidently applied to rod-like mesogens with low rotational barriers; for bent or bulky cores, 3D ESP anisotropy may need to be included.
  • The entropic argument that several comparable parallel packing minima offset an enthalpic penalty suggests a testable design strategy: adding substituents that create multiple nearly-degenerate parallel contacts could further stabilise polar order, a direction the paper gestures toward but does not demonstrate.
  • Quantifying the ESP wave (amplitude, wavelength, phase) and correlating it with T_NF-I across a broader dataset could turn the qualitative oscillation criterion into a quantitative descriptor for machine-learning-guided materials design.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 8 minor

Summary. The paper reports the synthesis and characterization of 27 systematically fluorinated biphenyl benzoate liquid crystals, identifying ferroelectric nematic (NF) and antiferroelectric nematic (NX) phases in several homologues. The key experimental observation is that compounds with the X.Y.1 fluorination pattern exhibit higher polar-phase transition temperatures than their more fluorinated analogues despite having smaller total dipole moments. Using DFT-computed electrostatic potential (ESP) surfaces, the authors argue that molecules with a more oscillatory radial ESP distribution along the long axis have a higher propensity to form polar nematic phases, and they support this with bimolecular potential energy surface calculations. The abstract presents the ESP-oscillation criterion as a general design rule for future ferroelectric nematogens.

Significance. If the central claim is established, the paper would provide a valuable molecular design principle: radial surface-charge pattern, rather than dipole-moment magnitude, determines polar nematic stability. The experimental dataset itself is a strength: a systematic 27-compound series with phase assignments supported by POM, DSC, current-response measurements, and X-ray scattering for representative compounds, and the X.Y.1 trend is an empirical observation that stands independently of the computational interpretation. The DFT calculations are standard and no parameters are fitted to the phase data. However, the headline ESP-oscillation rule is currently qualitative and retrospective, which limits its immediate utility as a predictive design rule. The paper has the potential to be an important contribution to the chemistry of ferroelectric nematics once the computational claim is made testable.

major comments (5)
  1. [Results and Discussion, Figure 4] The central design principle is expressed entirely in qualitative terms: curves are described as "oscillat[ing] almost sinusoidally", "more pronounced, lacking a clear oscillatory structure", and "spatially uniform", with no algorithm, threshold, or scalar index defining "oscillatory" versus "non-oscillatory". Because the abstract states this as a general rule ("molecules possessing a more oscillatory distribution of electrons across their surfaces possessing a higher propensity to form polar nematic phases"), the rule should be operationalized so that an independent reader can compute the descriptor from the 1D ESP data and test the correlation with polar-phase propensity. Without such a metric, the central claim is not falsifiable.
  2. [SI section 1.6] The ESP descriptor depends on the chosen electron-density isovalue (0.0004), the static B3LYP-GD3BJ/cc-pVTZ geometry, and the radial-averaging/rescaling procedure. The manuscript reports no test that the qualitative distinction between "oscillatory" and "uniform" curves is robust to these choices, for example by varying the isovalue over a reasonable range or re-optimizing with a different functional. Since the design rule is presented as a general molecular-level principle, the absence of a robustness check leaves open the possibility that the classification is an artifact of the calculation protocol.
  3. [Results and Discussion, "Inspection of these plots..."] The classification of compounds into "oscillatory" versus "non-oscillatory" is performed on the same 27 molecules whose phase behavior is already known, and the text explicitly selects examples based on that knowledge (e.g., 2.2.Z vs 2.0.Z). This is a retrospective rationalization rather than a predictive test. The authors should either state this limitation explicitly or provide an out-of-sample validation (e.g., predict the phase behavior of a newly synthesized compound) to support the claim that the criterion is a "design strategy".
  4. [Results and Discussion, Figure 5] The statement that "for none of 1-27 does the global minima in complexation energy for the parallel packed molecules become lower than antiparallel" is presented as a general result, but the manuscript shows data only for 2.2.2 in Figure 5. If this claim is used to support the entropy-based argument for parallel packing, the complexation energies, or at least the differences between parallel and antiparallel global minima, should be tabulated for all compounds in the SI.
  5. [Figure 3f and Table S3] The claim that X.Y.1 homologues have higher polar-phase transition temperatures "whilst possessing smaller values of µ" is based on total dipole magnitude. However, the longitudinal component, which can be computed as μ·cos(θ) from Table S3, is actually slightly larger for the Z=1 compounds than for their Z=2 counterparts in each X.Y series (e.g., 2.2.2 vs 2.2.1: about 11.52 D vs 11.57 D; 1.2.2 vs 1.2.1: about 10.64 D vs 10.70 D). Since the paper frames the design in terms of the longitudinal dipole moment, the authors should report longitudinal components and show that the empirical trend is not explained by them, or else avoid making the "smaller dipole moment" claim based on total magnitude.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Throughout] Several figure references are incorrect: "Figure 1b(ii)", "Figure 1g", and "Figure 1h" should refer to panels in Figure 3, and the ESP panel referenced as "Figure 2a" after the radial-averaging description should be Figure 4a.
  2. [SI, Figure S9] The caption labels compound 11 as "2.1.1", but Table S1 and the main text identify compound 11 as having the 0.2.1 fluorination pattern.
  3. [Figure 5 caption] The caption states "Molecular structure of 2∙2∙2 (27)", but compound 27 is 0.0.0 in Table S1; the structure shown is compound 1 (2.2.2).
  4. [Results and Discussion] The text says "the conformation of the transition temperature by differential scanning calorimetry"; "conformation" should read "confirmation".
  5. [References] Reference [45] (Hess et al., LINCS) is a molecular dynamics constraint algorithm, not a DFT or dispersion-correction method; it appears to be an incorrect citation for the B3LYP-GD3BJ method, which should instead cite Grimme et al. for GD3BJ and Dunning for cc-pVTZ.
  6. [Table S3] Several width entries are malformed, e.g., "0.5.09" and "0.4.99", and should be decimal values (0.509, 0.499).
  7. [Introduction] The phrase "due to it's the potential" is ungrammatical and should read "due to its potential".
  8. [Conclusions] The word "complimented" in "We have complimented our synthetic efforts" should be "complemented".

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: DFT-derived ESP descriptors are independent of phase data; the qualitative 'oscillation' criterion is post hoc but not constructed from the outcome.

full rationale

The central claim is that a more oscillatory radially averaged ESP at the 0.0004 isodensity corresponds to a higher propensity for polar nematic order. The ESP traces are obtained from DFT (B3LYP-GD3BJ/cc-pVTZ) calculations on isolated optimized geometries (SI section 1.6); no parameter of the calculation is fitted to the measured TN-I, TNF-I, or TNX-N values. The bimolecular PES/IRI analysis is likewise an ab initio computation. The Madhusudana model that motivates the ESP interpretation is an external literature model (ref 35), not a self-citation. Self-citations present (refs 20, 27, 29, 33) support phase-assignment conventions and prior polar-phase reports but are not load-bearing for the ESP-oscillation rule. The legitimate scientific weakness is that 'oscillatory' is not operationalized: the paper separates polar-forming from solely nematic homologues and then identifies the ESP differences by inspection (main text Results and Discussion, Figure 4; SI Figure S3), so the rule is not yet a falsifiable quantitative predictor and may be an in-sample rationalization. That is a robustness/falsifiability limitation, not a circular derivation: the descriptor values are not defined in terms of the phase outcome and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. Accordingly, no circular step meeting the paper's own equations or self-citation chain is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on a small set of computational and modeling choices: the DFT level, the ESP isovalue, the radial-averaging assumption, and Madhusudana's electrostatic model. No numerical free parameters are fitted to the phase data, but the ESP descriptor is defined post hoc on the same dataset, which is a weak form of circularity. No invented entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • ESP isovalue
    Chosen as 0.0004 e/bohr^3 to define the 3D ESP surface and the contour for radial averaging; the shape of the 1D ESP profile, and hence the claimed oscillatory structure, depends on this threshold.
  • Number of PES minima refined per compound
    Set to 5 for computational tractability; the entropy argument about multiple parallel minima depends on how many minima are located and optimized.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Madhusudana's electrostatic model: oscillatory ESP along the molecular long axis stabilizes parallel side-by-side packing and supports polar order.
    Invoked in the Results section to interpret the 1D ESP data; the design rule rests on this model's validity.
  • domain assumption Static DFT geometries and free rotation around the long axis approximate the relevant condensed-phase electrostatic environment.
    SI section 1.6: the radial ESP averaging assumes free molecular rotation and ignores conformational flexibility, temperature, and many-body effects.
  • domain assumption B3LYP-GD3BJ/cc-pVTZ is an adequate level of theory for ESP and intermolecular interaction energies of these molecules.
    Used for all ESP and PES calculations; no benchmark against higher-level wavefunction methods is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Systematic Fluorination is a Powerful Design Strategy Towards Fluid Molecular Ferroelectrics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SSBPGGFH

@misc{pith2026241114115,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Systematic Fluorination is a Powerful Design Strategy Towards Fluid Molecular Ferroelectrics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SSBPGGFH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14115}
}
read the original abstract

Ferroelectric nematic (NF) liquid crystals combine liquid-like fluidity and orientational order of conventional nematics with macroscopic electric polarization comparable in magnitude to solid state ferroelectric materials. Here, we present a systematic study of twenty-seven homologous materials with various fluorination patterns, giving new insight into the molecular origins of spontaneous polar ordering in fluid ferroelectric nematics. Beyond our initial expectations, we find the highest stability of the NF phase to be in materials with specific fluorination patterns rather than the maximal fluorination which might be expected based on simple models. We find a delicate balance between polar and apolar nematics which is entirely dictated by the substitution of the fluorine atoms. Aided by electronic structure calculations, we show this to have its origins in the radial distribution of charge across the molecular surface, with molecules possessing a more oscillatory distribution of electrons across their surfaces possessing a higher propensity to form polar nematic phases. This work provides a new set of ground rules and designing principles which can inform the synthesis of future ferroelectric nematogens.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R. J. Mandle, S. J. Cowling, and J. W. Goodby, Rational Design of Rod -Like Liquid Crystals Exhibiting Two Nematic Phases, Chemistry - A European Journal 23, 14554 (2017)

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Nishikawa, K

    H. Nishikawa, K. Shiroshita, H. Higuchi, Y . Okumura, Y . Haseba, S. I. Yamamoto, K. Sago, and H. Kikuchi, A Fluid Liquid -Crystal Material with Highly Polar Order, Advanced Materials 29, 1702354 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Sebastián, M

    N. Sebastián, M. Čopič, and A. Mertelj, Ferroelectric nematic liquid -crystalline phases, Phys Rev E 106, 021001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Y . Song, S. Aya, and M. Huang, Updated view of new liquid-matter ferroelectrics with nematic and smectic orders, Giant 19, 100318 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    X. Chen et al., First-principles experimental demonstration of ferroelectricity in a thermotropic nematic liquid crystal: Polar domains and striking electro-optics, PNAS 117, 14021 (2002)

    work page 2002

  6. [6]

    O. D. Lavrentovich, Ferroelectric nematic liquid crystal, a century in waiting, PNAS 117, 14629 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Kumari, B

    P. Kumari, B. Basnet, M. O. Lavrentovich, and O. D. Lavrentovich, Chiral ground states of ferroelectric liquid crystals, Science 383, 1364 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    Mertelj, L

    A. Mertelj, L. Cmok, N. Sebastián, R. J. Mandle, R. R. Parker, A. C. Whitwood, J. W. Goodby, and M. Čopič, Splay Nematic Phase, Phys Rev X 8, 041025 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Sebastián, L

    N. Sebastián, L. Cmok, R. J. Mandle, M. R. De La Fuente, I. Drevenšek Olenik, M. Čopič, and A. Mertelj, Ferroelectric-Ferroelastic Phase Transition in a Nematic Liquid Crystal, Phys Rev Lett 124, 037801 (2020). 13

    2020

  2. [10]

    R. J. Mandle, N. Sebastián, J. Martinez -Perdiguero, and A. Mertelj, On the molecular origins of the ferroelectric splay nematic phase, Nat Commun 12, 4962 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    Sebastián et al., Polarization patterning in ferroelectric nematic liquids via flexoelectric coupling, Nat Commun 14, 3029 (2023)

    N. Sebastián et al., Polarization patterning in ferroelectric nematic liquids via flexoelectric coupling, Nat Commun 14, 3029 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    J. Li, H. Nishikawa, J. Kougo, J. Zhou, S. Dai, W. Tang, X. Zhao, Y . Hisai, M. Huang, and S. Aya, Development of ferroelectric nematic fluids with giant -ε dielectricity and nonlinear optical properties, Sci. Adv 7, 5047 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Caimi, G

    F. Caimi, G. Nava, S. Fuschetto, L. Lucchetti, P. Paiè, R. Osellame, X. Chen, N. A. Clark, M. A. Glaser, and T. Bellini, Fluid superscreening and polarization following in confined ferroelectric nematics, Nat Phys 19, 1658 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    X. Chen, E. Korblova, M. A. Glaser, J. E. Maclennan, D. M. Walba, and N. A. Clark, Polar in- plane surface orientation of a ferroelectric nematic liquid crystal: Polar monodomains and twisted state electro-optics, PNAS 118, e2104092118 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    M. P. Kumar, J. Karcz, P. Kula, S. Karmakar, and S. Dhara, Giant Electroviscous Effects in a Ferroelectric Nematic Liquid Crystal, Phys Rev Appl 19, 044082 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    Sebastián, R

    N. Sebastián, R. J. Mandle, A. Petelin, A. Eremin, and A. Mertelj, Electrooptics of mm -scale polar domains in the ferroelectric nematic phase, Liq Cryst 48, 2055 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Sultanov, A

    V . Sultanov, A. Kavčič, E. Kokkinakis, N. Sebastián, M. V . Chekhova, and M. Humar, Tunable entangled photon-pair generation in a liquid crystal, Nature 631, 294 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Okada, H

    D. Okada, H. Nishikawa, and F. Araoka, Tunable Intracavity Coherent Up -Conversion with Giant Nonlinearity in a Polar Fluidic Medium, Adv Sci 11, 2405227 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    M. S. H. Himel, K. Perera, A. Adaka, P. Guragain, R. J. Twieg, S. Sprunt, J. T. Gleeson, and A. Jákli, Electrically Tunable Chiral Ferroelectric Nematic Liquid Crystal Reflectors, Adv Funct Mater , 2413674 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202413674

    2024 doi

  12. [20]

    Hobbs, C

    J. Hobbs, C. J. Gibb, and R. J. Mandle, Emergent Antiferroelectric Ordering and the Coupling of Liquid Crystalline and Polar Order, Small Science 4, 2400189 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Nishikawa, K

    H. Nishikawa, K. Sano, S. Kurihara, G. Watanabe, A. Nihonyanagi, B. Dhara, and F. Araoka, Nano-clustering mediates phase transitions in a diastereomerically -stabilized ferroelectric nematic system, Commun Mater 3, 89 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    J. Zhou, R. Xia, M. Huang, and S. Aya, Stereoisomer effect on ferroelectric nematics: stabilization and phase behavior diversification, J Mater Chem C 10, 8762 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    R. J. Mandle, A new order of liquids: polar order in nematic liquid crystals, Soft Matter 18, 5014 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    Cruickshank, The Emergence of a Polar Nematic Phase: A Chemist’s Insight into the Ferroelectric Nematic Phase, Chempluschem 89, e202300726 (2024)

    E. Cruickshank, The Emergence of a Polar Nematic Phase: A Chemist’s Insight into the Ferroelectric Nematic Phase, Chempluschem 89, e202300726 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    M. A. Osipov, Dipole -dipole interactions and the origin of ferroelectric ordering in polar nematics, Liq Cryst, 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/02678292.2024.2349667

    2024

  18. [26]

    M. A. Osipov, On the origin of the ferroelectric ordering in nematic liquid crystals and the electrostatic properties of ferroelectric nematic materials, Liq Cryst Rev 12, 14 (2024). 14

    2024

  19. [27]

    Hobbs, C

    J. Hobbs, C. J. Gibb, D. Pociecha, J. Szydłowska, E. Górecka, and R. J. Mandle, Polar Order in a Fluid Like Ferroelectric with a Tilted Lamellar Structure – Observation of a Polar Smectic C (SmCP) Phase, Angew Chem Int Ed, e202416545 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202416545

    2024 doi

  20. [28]

    Szydlowska et al., Ferroelectric Nematic-Isotropic Liquid Critical End Point., Phys Rev Lett 130 21, 216802 (2023)

    J. Szydlowska et al., Ferroelectric Nematic-Isotropic Liquid Critical End Point., Phys Rev Lett 130 21, 216802 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    P. M. Rupnik, E. Hanžel, M. Lovšin, N. Osterman, C. J. Gibb, R. J. Mandle, N. Sebastián, and A. Mertelj, Antiferroelectric order in nematic liquids: Flexoelectricity vs electrostatics, arXiv, (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.06915

    2024 doi arXiv

  22. [30]

    Chen et al., The smectic ZA phase: Antiferroelectric smectic order as a prelude to the ferroelectric nematic, PNAS 120, e2217150120 (2023)

    X. Chen et al., The smectic ZA phase: Antiferroelectric smectic order as a prelude to the ferroelectric nematic, PNAS 120, e2217150120 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Chen et al., Observation of a uniaxial ferroelectric smectic A phase, PNAS 119, e2210062119 (2022)

    X. Chen et al., Observation of a uniaxial ferroelectric smectic A phase, PNAS 119, e2210062119 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    C. A. Parton-Barr, H. F. Gleeson, and R. J. Mandle, Room -temperature ferroelectric nematic liquid crystal showing a large and diverging density, Soft Matter 20, 672 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    C. J. Gibb, J. Hobbs, D. I. Nikolova, T. Raistrick, S. R. Berrow, A. Mertelj, N. Osterman, N. Sebastián, H. F. Gleeson, and R. J. Mandle, Spontaneous symmetry breaking in polar fluids, Nat Commun 15, 5845 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    Brown, E

    S. Brown, E. Cruickshank, J. M. D. Storey, C. T. Imrie, D. Pociecha, M. Majewska, A. Makal, and E. Gorecka, Multiple Polar and Non-polar Nematic Phases, ChemPhysChem 22, 2506 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    N. V . Madhusudana, Simple molecular model for ferroelectric nematic liquid crystals exhibited by small rodlike mesogens, Phys Rev E 104, 014704 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    J. W. Goodby, E. J. Davis, R. J. Mandle, and S. J. Cowling, Nano -Segregation and Directed Self-Assembly in the Formation of Functional Liquid Crystals, Isr J Chem 52, 863 (2012)

    2012

  29. [37]

    C. J. Gibb, J. M. D. Storey, and C. T. Imrie, A convenient one-pot synthesis, and characterisation of the ω-bromo-1-(4-cyanobiphenyl-4’-yl) alkanes (CBnBr), Liq Cryst 49, 1706 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    Nacke et al., New examples of ferroelectric nematic materials showing evidence for the antiferroelectric smectic-Z phase, Sci Rep 14, 4473 (2024)

    P. Nacke et al., New examples of ferroelectric nematic materials showing evidence for the antiferroelectric smectic-Z phase, Sci Rep 14, 4473 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Tufaha, E

    N. Tufaha, E. Cruickshank, D. Pociecha, E. Gorecka, J. M. D. Storey, and C. T. Imrie, Molecular Shape, Electronic Factors, and the Ferroelectric Nematic Phase: Investigating the Impact of Structural Modifications, Chem Euro J 29, e202300073 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Ewan Cruickshank Naila Tufaha and C. T. Imrie, The influence of molecular shape and electronic properties on the formation of the ferroelectric nematic phase, Liq Cryst 51, 401 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    A. A. Marchenko, O. L. Kapitanchuk, Y . Yu. Lopatina, K. G. Nazarenko, A. I. Senenko, N. Katsonis, V . G. Nazarenko, and O. D. Lavrentovich, Polar Self-Organization of Ferroelectric Nematic- Liquid-Crystal Molecules on Atomically Flat Au(111) Surface, Phys Rev Lett 132, 098101 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G .E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, G. Scalmani, V . Barone, B. Mennucci, G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Caricato, X. Li, H. P. Hratchian, A. F. Izmaylov, J. Bloino, G. Zheng, J. L. Sonnenberg, M. Hada , M. Ehara, K. Toyo...

    2016

  35. [43]

    A. D. Becke, Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange, Journal of Chemical Physics 98, 5648 (1993)

    1993

  36. [44]

    Lee, eitao Yang, and R

    C. Lee, eitao Yang, and R. G. Parr, Development of the Colic -Salvetti correlation -energy formula into a functional of the electron density, Phys Rev B 37, 15 (1988)

    1988

  37. [45]

    B. Hess, H. Bekker, H. J. C. Berendsen, and J. G. E. M. Fraaije, LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations, J Comput Chem 18, 1463 (1997)

    1997

  38. [46]

    Lu and Q

    T. Lu and Q. Chen, Interaction Region Indicator: A Simple Real Space Function Clearly Revealing Both Chemical Bonds and Weak Interactions, Chemistry–Methods 1, 231 (2021). 16 Systematic Fluorination is a Powerful Design Strategy Towards Fluid Molecular Ferroelectrics Supplemen...

    2021

  39. [47]

    Physique Lett

    Martinot-Lagarde Ph., Direct electrical measurement of the permanent polarization of a ferroelectric chiral smectic C liquid crystal, J. Physique Lett. 38, 17 (1977)

    1977

  40. [48]

    Miyasato, S

    K. Miyasato, S. Abe, H. Takezoe, A. Fukuda, and E. Kuze, Direct Method with Triangular Waves for Measuring Spontaneous Polarization in Ferroelectric Liquid Crystals, Jpn J Appl Phys 22, L661 (1983)

    1983

  41. [49]

    Chen et al., The smectic ZA phase: Antiferroelectric smectic order as a prelude to the ferroelectric nematic, PNAS 120, (2023)

    X. Chen et al., The smectic ZA phase: Antiferroelectric smectic order as a prelude to the ferroelectric nematic, PNAS 120, (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G .E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, G. Scalmani, V. Barone, B. Mennucci, G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Caricato, X. Li, H. P . Hratchian, A. F. Izmaylov, J. Bloino, G. Zheng, J. L. Sonnenberg, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyot...

    2016

  43. [51]

    A. D. Becke, Density -functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange, Journal of Chemical Physics 98, 5648 (1993)

    1993

  44. [52]

    C. Lee, W. Yang, and R. G. Parr, Development of the Colle -Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density, Phys Rev B 37, 785 (1988)

    1988

  45. [53]

    B. Hess, H. Bekker, H. J. C. Berendsen, and J. G. E. M. Fraaije, LINCS: A Linear Constraint Solver for molecular simulations, J Comput Chem 18, 1463 (1997)

    1997

  46. [54]

    Lu and Q

    T. Lu and Q. Chen, Interaction Region Indicator: A Simple Real Space Function Clearly Revealing Both Chemical Bonds and Weak Interactions, Chemistry–Methods 1, 231 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    Hobbs, C

    J. Hobbs, C. J. Gibb, and R. J. Mandle, Emergent Antiferroelectric Ordering and the Coupling of Liquid Crystalline and Polar Order, Small Science 2400189 (2024)

    2024

  48. [56]

    Y . Sang, S. Han, S. Han, C. Pannecouque, E. De Clercq, C. Zhuang, and F. Chen, Follow on-based optimization of the biphenyl -DAPYs as HIV-1 nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors against the wild-type and mutant strains, Bioorg Chem 89, 102974 (2019)

    2019

  49. [57]

    G. W. Gray, M. Hird, D. Lacey, and K. J. Toyne, The Synthesis and Transition Temperatures of Some Fluoro-Substituted 4-Cyanophenyl and 4-Cyanobiphenyl-4′-yl 4-Pentyl- 61 and 4 -Butoxy-Benzoates, Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals Incorporating Nonlinear Optics 172, 165 (1989)

    1989

  50. [58]

    Kirsch, E

    P . Kirsch, E. Montenegro, L. D. Farrand, D. Pauluth, M. Heckmeier, Liquid crystal materials characterised by the chemical structure of the liquid crystal components, e.g. by a specific unit the structure containing one or more specific, optionally substituted ring or ring sys...

    2010

  51. [59]

    Mingjun, X

    H. Mingjun, X. Xiaochen , S. Yahohao, L. Jinxing, W. Zhidong, X. Runli, Optically active compound, liquid crystal composition containing the same and liquid crystal device using the composition. JP2002226451A, 2002

    2002

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.