Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 35 references

Origami with a Twist: Twisted Holography of Four-Dimensional $\mathcal{N}=2$ Orientifold Theories

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proposes that the protected chiral algebra of any $\mathcal{N}=2$ superconformal gauge theory from an orientifold has a twisted-holographic dual: topological string theory on $\mathrm{SL}_2\mathbb{C}/\Gamma$, with the…

desk verdict A transparent conjecture paper with one solid parity check; worth refereeing, but the leap from Z2 to all ADE orientifolds is the soft spot. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14200 v1 pith:2H2IG6M3 submitted 2024-11-21 hep-th

Jacob Abajian This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords N=2superconformalfieldtheorychiralalgebratwistedholographyorientifoldtopologicalstringKodaira-SpencerBCOVD3-branes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Four-dimensional $\mathcal{N}=2$ superconformal gauge theories that admit a weakly coupled limit can be built by placing D3-branes on orientifold singularities, and each such theory carries a protected subsector that forms a two-dimensional chiral algebra. This paper proposes that, in the large-$N$ limit, that chiral algebra has a twisted-holographic dual: topological string theory, whose spacetime physics is Kodaira-Spencer (BCOV) theory, on the Calabi-Yau threefold $\mathrm{SL}_2\mathbb{C}/\Gamma$, with $\Gamma$ the finite orientifold group. For orientifolds containing an O7-plane, the dual is instead the unoriented topological string on $\mathrm{SL}_2\mathbb{C}/G_1$, because the twist localizes the theory onto the O7-plane. The paper's central observation is that orientation-reversing elements of the orientifold leave the bulk complex structure unchanged and manifest themselves only as a choice of spin structure, meaning twisted boundary conditions for the fermionic fields in the bulk, which distinguishes these chiral algebras from ordinary orbifold theories on the same space. If the proposal is right, it supplies a holographic interpretation for a large family of $\mathcal{N}=2$ quiver gauge theories and shows that orientifold data survive the twist in a precise, computable form.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the $Q+S$ twist: a nilpotent supercharge built from a supersymmetry generator $Q$ and a superconformal generator $S$, whose cohomology selects the protected local operators of the four-dimensional theory and makes them into a two-dimensional chiral algebra, a set of operators depending holomorphically on one coordinate with crossing-symmetric OPEs. On the gravity side, twisting supergravity corresponds to turning on a bosonic ghost background, and for type IIB superstrings it produces the spacetime physics of the B-model topological string, namely Kodaira-Spencer (BCOV) theory. The proposal is that in these orientifold backgrounds the bulk theory lives on the quotient $\mathrm{SL}_2\mathbb{C}/\Gamma$, with the orientation-reversing elements of $\Gamma$ realized as a $\mathbb{Z}_2$-bundle, a spin-structure choice, that changes only the boundary conditions of the fermionic fields $\alpha$ and $\gamma$, while the Beltrami differential $\beta$ (the complex-structure deformation) is insensitive to it. For O7 orientifolds the same twist collapses the theory onto the O7-plane, where the relevant bulk theory is the anomaly-free unoriented topological string on $\mathrm{SL}_2\mathbb{C}/G_1$.

What would settle it

Compute the large-$N$ chiral algebra of a nontrivial ADE orientifold theory, for instance the binary tetrahedral O3 orientifold or the O7 theory with $\Gamma=\mathbb{Z}_2^{\Omega'}\times\mathbb{Z}_3$, and compare the B and C operator towers, or the full characters, with the prediction of Kodaira-Spencer theory on $\mathrm{SL}_2\mathbb{C}/\Gamma$ with the claimed spin-structure boundary conditions; a mismatch in parity, multiplicity, or level would settle the proposal against the extrapolation from the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ case.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the chiral algebra associated to any of these $\mathcal{N}=2$ superconformal orientifold theories is holographically dual, in the large-$N$ limit, to topological strings on a Calabi-Yau threefold of the form $\mathrm{SL}_2\mathbb{C}/\Gamma$. When the orientifold group contains the element $\Omega' = \Omega R_{45}(-1)^{F_L}$, whose fixed locus is an O7-plane, the twist localizes the theory entirely onto that plane, and the bulk is described by unoriented topological strings on $\mathrm{SL}_2\mathbb{C}/G_1$; the expected $\mathrm{SO}(8)$ Kac-Moody subalgebra in the boundary chiral algebra matches the $\mathrm{SO}(8)$ holomorphic Chern-Simons theory on the space-filling branes. When the orientifold instead contains an O3-plane, the bulk background is the same quotient $\mathrm{SL}_2\mathbb{C}/\Gamma$ as for the orbifold by $\Gamma$, but the orientation-reversing elements act as a nontrivial $\mathbb{Z}_2$-bundle over the quotient, equivalently a choice of spin structure, which fixes the boundary conditions for the fermionic Chern-Simons fields $\alpha$ and $\gamma$ while leaving the complex-structure sector (the A and D towers of operators) untouched. The explicit $\mathbb{Z}_2$ example shows that the $\mathrm{SO}(N)$/$\mathrm{USp}(2N)$ chiral algebras differ from the two-node quiver theory precisely in the parity of the B and C towers, and the paper conjectures this spin-structure distinction persists for every ADE subgroup of $\mathrm{SU}(2)$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that, after twisting, the orientation-reversing part of an orientifold only chooses which fields are periodic or antiperiodic around the cycles of $\mathrm{SL}_2\mathbb{C}/\Gamma$ and adds no other new structure to the bulk, a pattern verified only in the two-element example and assumed for the entire ADE family of finite subgroups.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The chiral algebra associated to a given orientifold group is independent of the chosen weakly coupled limit, so quivers appearing in the same box of the paper's tables must have identical chiral algebras in the large-$N$ limit, since they describe the same B-model background.
  • The two-node $\mathbb{Z}_2$ orbifold theory and the $\mathrm{SO}(2N+1)$/$\mathrm{USp}(2N)$ orientifold theories share the same complex-structure sector (the A and D towers) but differ in the fermionic sector (the B and C towers), with the latter two theories identical in the large-$N$ limit as a manifestation of S-duality.
  • For O7 orientifolds with group $\mathbb{Z}_2^{\Omega'}\times G_1$, the dual is the unoriented topological string on $\mathrm{SL}_2\mathbb{C}/G_1$, and the $\mathrm{SO}(8)$ flavor symmetry of the boundary chiral algebra matches the $\mathrm{SO}(8)$ holomorphic Chern-Simons theory on the space-filling branes.
  • The orientifold information that survives the twist is precisely the spin structure, so distinct orientifold theories can share the same Calabi-Yau vacuum but still be distinguished by their fermionic boundary conditions.
  • The proposal extends the twisted holography dictionary from orbifold theories to the full list of $\mathcal{N}=2$ superconformal gauge theories coming from O3- and O7-plane orientifolds, including all finite subgroups of $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ in the ADE classification.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper's claims, the spin-structure mechanism suggests a general rule: whenever a discrete symmetry with orientation reversal acts on a twisted-holographic background, its only imprint in the protected sector will be through fermionic boundary conditions, making the B and C towers universal detectors of such $\mathbb{Z}_2$-bundles.
  • The conjecture could be stress-tested at finite $N$ by computing the characters of the chiral algebras for the binary tetrahedral or octahedral orientifold quivers and comparing with open topological string partition functions on $\mathrm{SL}_2\mathbb{C}/\Gamma$; a mismatch there would show where the extrapolation from the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ example to the full ADE family fails.
  • One can also ask whether the O7 localization onto unoriented topological strings admits a direct worldsheet definition as an orientifold of the B-model, in which case the anomaly-cancellation condition for unoriented topological strings would serve as a consistency check for the entire twisted duality.
  • If the spin structure is visible in the chiral algebra, modular properties or spectral-flow sectors of the two-dimensional theory should detect it, giving a purely field-theoretic invariant that distinguishes orientifold duals on the same Calabi-Yau threefold.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes twisted holographic duals for the chiral algebras associated to a large class of four-dimensional N=2 superconformal gauge theories realized by D3-branes on orientifolds. For O3-plane orientifolds with orientifold group Γ and orientation-preserving subgroup G1, the proposal is that the bulk dual is topological string theory on SL2C/Γ, with the orientation-reversing elements encoding a Z2-bundle or spin structure that affects only certain fermionic boundary conditions. For O7-plane orientifolds of the form ZΩ'_2 × G1, the proposal instead involves unoriented topological strings on SL2C/G1, with the boundary chiral algebra carrying an SO(8) Kac-Moody symmetry. Section 2 organizes the orientifold constructions and their quiver gauge theories, while Section 3 develops the proposed dualities. The only concrete computation is the Γ = Z2 example in Section 3.2, where trace identities show that the SO/USp orientifold chiral algebras keep the A_n and D_n towers at even n and the B_n and C_n towers at odd n, thereby distinguishing them from the Z2 orbifold theory. The paper is explicit that the general dualities are conjectures to be proven in future work.

Significance. If the conjectures are correct, the paper extends the twisted holography program of Costello and Gaiotto to a broad set of orientifold theories, including a proposal involving unoriented topological strings, which would be a novel holographic arena. The paper is commendably transparent: it has no free parameters, it clearly labels the central dualities as conjectures, and it provides one explicit, clean check in the Z2 case. The observation that the SO/USp and Z2-orbifold chiral algebras share the A and D towers but differ in the B and C towers is a useful and falsifiable diagnostic. However, the significance is currently limited by the fact that all load-bearing steps beyond the Z2 example are asserted rather than derived, so the paper reads more as a research announcement than as a completed duality proposal.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, after Eq. (3.3)] The central step from the Z2 example to general O3 orientifolds is not established. The paper shows in Eqs. (3.1)-(3.3) that the SO/USp projection keeps A_n and D_n for even n and B_n and C_n for odd n, and then states that in general the choice of index-2 subgroup is a Z2-bundle/spin structure that changes only the boundary conditions of the fermionic Chern-Simons fields α and γ, while the A and D towers, tied to the Beltrami differential and complex structure, are unchanged. This is an extrapolation from a free-chiral-algebra parity computation to a statement about the action of αΩ' on BCOV/Kodaira-Spencer theory for nontrivial α. No such action is computed or even defined for a non-cyclic Γ. Since the claim that 'the resulting background is simply SL2C/Γ' rests on this premise, the paper should either derive this for at least one non-cyclic example or explicitly demote it to a conjecture with a concrete test (e.g., matching the projected single-trace towers against a bulk computation of boundary-condition-changing operators).
  2. [Sec. 3.1] The O7 proposal is stated but not derived. The paper asserts that upon twisting the IIB theory localizes entirely onto the O7-plane and that the local physics is described by unoriented topological strings, with the USp(2N) theory plus antisymmetric and four fundamentals as the boundary dual. The only direct evidence offered is the SO(8) flavor symmetry matching the SO(8) holomorphic Chern-Simons theory on space-filling branes. Since this is one of the two central families of dualities, the absence of any computation of the single-trace chiral algebra or of the bulk localization means the claim currently has the status of an analogy. Please either provide supporting evidence or clearly mark the entire O7 family as a conjecture separate from the O3 case, and state what would be needed to test it.
  3. [Sec. 2.2-2.6 and end of Sec. 3 introduction] The paper's conjecture that all quivers belonging to the same orientifold group give the same large-N chiral algebra is load-bearing for the claim that the bulk is determined entirely by the orientifold group. However, the orientifold projection depends on the chosen Chan-Paton representation, and different representations give different quivers, e.g. Eq. (2.25) versus Eq. (2.26) for ZαΩ'_8 lead to different gauge-group factors and matter representations. The paper provides no computation showing that the projected single-trace spectra coincide in the large-N limit, and no example beyond the SO/USp duality of the Z2 case. Without this, the map from a given field theory to a unique bulk is ambiguous. This needs either proof for a nontrivial example or an explicit caveat that the bulk assignment is part of the conjecture.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3.3)] The text says that for sp(2N) 'the same equation holds' and writes M_i^T = -Ω M_i Ω^{-1}, but the displayed trace relation would be clearer if the conjugation by Ω were carried through explicitly; the final parity conclusion is correct, but the intermediate step is abbreviated.
  2. [Sec. 4] Typo: 'tractible' should be 'tractable' in the final bullet point.
  3. [Sec. 2.2, Eq. (2.14)] The block matrix Ω_m is defined only implicitly; stating its size explicitly (m/2 × m/2 blocks) would improve readability, especially since the same symbol recurs in later sections.
  4. [Tables 2-4] The tables list conformal rank assignments but do not fully specify the hypermultiplet representations for every node; referring explicitly to the equation numbers for the Chan-Paton representations in each row would make the tables more self-contained.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the orientifold dualities are conjectured extensions built on an external benchmark ([10]) plus a direct Z2 chiral-algebra check; the extrapolation to general ADE groups is an unsupported leap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing claims are (1) that the Q+S twist of the large-N SU(N) theory is BCOV theory on SL2C, imported from Costello-Gaiotto [10], and (2) that orientifold versions are dual to topological strings on SL2C/Γ (O3 case) or unoriented topological strings on SL2C/G1 (O7 case). Claim (1) is an external, parameter-free result with stated assumptions that do not include the orientifold target; citing it is legitimate support, not self-citation. Claim (2) is not derived from a fit or from a definition. The only concrete computation in support is the Z2 example in Sec. 3.2, where the chiral algebra of SO(N)/USp(2N) is computed directly from the field-theoretic projection (Eqs. 3.1-3.3) and compared with the Z2 orbifold result; the A/D towers match and the B/C towers differ, establishing that the bulk is PSL2C with different boundary conditions for fermionic Chern-Simons fields. That is an independent check, not a tautology. The generalization to arbitrary Γ, and the identification of the orientifold data with a spin structure over SL2C/Γ, is stated as 'we find'/'we see' but is in fact an explicitly announced conjecture ('our purpose herein was simply to conjecture these holographic dualities, and we leave the proof of the dualities to future work'). An extrapolation from one example to all ADE subgroups is a gap in evidence—a correctness risk, not circularity. No parameter is fitted to the predicted chiral algebras, no uniqueness theorem from the authors is invoked, and no known result is renamed as a new one. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters or invented entities. It relies on the standard twisted-holography framework from [10], the anomaly-free unoriented topological string from [24], and standard orientifold and Chan-Paton technology from the cited literature.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Q+S twist of an N=2 SCFT is equivalent to an Omega-deformation of Kapustin's holomorphic-topological twist.
    Stated in Section 1, citing [7,8,9]; this is the basis for relating the chiral algebra to a twisted bulk.
  • domain assumption Spacetime twisting of supergravity corresponds to worldsheet twisting, so the bulk dual of the Q+S twist is BCOV theory.
    Stated in Section 1, citing [3] and [10]; this is the foundational identification of twisted holography that the paper extends.
  • domain assumption The orientifold group action can be represented projectively on Chan-Paton factors, and projecting open strings yields the quiver gauge theory.
    Used throughout Section 2, following standard orientifold technology from [12-18,25-29].
  • domain assumption In the large-N limit, the chiral algebra of a theory depends only on the orientifold group, not on the specific weakly coupled quiver presentation.
    Conjectured in Section 3: 'any quivers corresponding to the same orientifold group give rise to the same chiral algebra'.
  • domain assumption The unoriented topological string is anomaly free in complex dimension 3 with SO(8) space-filling branes.
    Invoked in Section 3.1, citing [24]; needed for the O7-plane duality proposal.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Origami with a Twist: Twisted Holography of Four-Dimensional $\mathcal{N}=2$ Orientifold Theories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2H2IG6M3

@misc{pith2026241114200,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Origami with a Twist: Twisted Holography of Four-Dimensional $\mathcalN=2$ Orientifold Theories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2H2IG6M3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14200}
}
abstract

We consider $\mathcal{N} = 2$ superconformal gauge theories in four dimensions. We explain how these quiver gauge theories arise as low-energy worldvolume theories of D3-branes on orientifolds. Then, we examine their associated chiral algebras, and propose novel examples of twisted holographic dualities arising in the large-N limit. These dualities involve topological strings in the bulk, which is a Calabi-Yau threefold taking the form $\text{SL}_2 \mathbb{C} / \Gamma$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.14200 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The quiver diagram representing the field content of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A diagrammatic representation of the Z Ω ′ 2 × Z4 orientifold. Performing the Z Ω ′ 2 orientifold with the representation γΩ′ as in equation (2.11) corresponds to folding the quiver across edges. Oppo￾site nodes and edges are glued together, and the edges that are folded become anti-symmetric tensors, resulting in the quiver on the right side of the figure. where for consistency of this construction, we require that… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A diagrammatic representation of another [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A diagrammatic representation of the Z Ω ′ 2 × Z3 orientifold. Performing the Z Ω ′ 2 orientifold with the representation γΩ′ as in equation (2.16) corresponds to folding the quiver. Opposite nodes and edges are glued together. The node that is folded into itself becom…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A diagrammatic representation of the Z Ω ′ 2 ×Dic4 orientifold with Ω′ represented as in equation (2.19). m0 m2 m1 m3 m4 m6 m5 m0 m2 m3 m4 m6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A diagrammatic representation of the Z Ω ′ 2 ×Dic4 orientifold with Ω′ represented as in equation (2.20). k Even For Γ = Z Ω ′ 2 × Dick, when k is even, we may choose to represent Ω′ as γΩ′ =   Ωm0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 −Ωm1 0 0 0 …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: A diagrammatic representation of a Z Ω ′ 2 × Dic4 orientifold. Another choice for Γ = Z Ω ′ 2 × Dick, when k is even, when m0 = m1 and mk+1 = mk+2 is γ˜Ω′ =   0 −1m0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1m1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: A diagrammatic representation of a Z Ω ′ 2 × Dic3 orientifold. where σΩ′ =   0 0 0 0 0 0 −1m0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . 0 0 0 0 0 −1mk/2 0 0 0 0 0 Ωmk/2+1 0 0 0 0 0 1mk/2+2 0 0 0 0 0 . . . 0 0 0 0 0 1mk+2 0 0 0 0 0 0   . (2.22) where we assu…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: A diagrammatic representation of a Z αΩ ′ 8 orientifold. The orientation-preserving subgroup is G1 = Z4 = hα 2 i. Performing the further orientifold by αΩ ′ with the representation γαΩ′ as in equation (2.25) corresponds to folding the quiver across edges. Opposite node…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: A diagrammatic representation of another [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: A diagrammatic representation of a Z αΩ ′ 6 orientifold. k Odd For Γ = Z αΩ ′ 2k , when k is odd, we also have two possible choices for representation. The first choice is γαΩ′ =   0 1m0 0 0 0 0 0 1m0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ω 2 2k1m1 0 0 0 0 0 1m1 0 0 0 …
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: A diagrammatic representation of another [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: A diagrammatic representation of a Dic2 = hα, jΩ ′ i orientifold. Starting with the orbifold by the subgroup G1 = Z4, adding in the generator jΩ ′ produces an alternating chain of SO and USp gauge group factors. It also identifies the X and X¯ bifundamental hypermulti…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Gaiotto, A

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, Generalized Global Symmetries , JHEP 02 (2015) 172, [ arXiv:1412.5148]

    arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    C. Beem, M. Lemos, P. Liendo, W. Peelaers, L. Rastelli, and B. C. v an Rees, Infinite Chiral Symmetry in Four Dimensions , Commun. Math. Phys. 336 (2015), no. 3 1359–1433, [arXiv:1312.5344]

    arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    Costello and S

    K. Costello and S. Li, Twisted supergravity and its quantization , arXiv:1606.00365

    arXiv

  4. [4]

    Bershadsky, S

    M. Bershadsky, S. Cecotti, H. Ooguri, and C. Vafa, Kodaira-Spencer theory of gravity and exact results for quantum string amplitudes , Commun. Math. Phys. 165 (1994) 311–428, [hep-th/9309140]

    arXiv 1994

  5. [5]

    K. J. Costello and S. Li, Quantum BCOV theory on Calabi-Yau manifolds and the higher g enus B-model, arXiv:1201.4501

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    Costello and S

    K. Costello and S. Li, Quantization of open-closed BCOV theory, I , arXiv:1505.06703

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    Kapustin, Holomorphic reduction of N=2 gauge theories, Wilson-’t Hoo ft operators, and S-duality, hep-th/0612119

    A. Kapustin, Holomorphic reduction of N=2 gauge theories, Wilson-’t Hoo ft operators, and S-duality, hep-th/0612119

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    Oh and J

    J. Oh and J. Yagi, Chiral algebras from Ω -deformation, JHEP 08 (2019) 143, [arXiv:1903.11123]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    Jeong, SCFT/VOA correspondence via Ω -deformation, JHEP 10 (2019) 171, [arXiv:1904.00927]

    S. Jeong, SCFT/VOA correspondence via Ω -deformation, JHEP 10 (2019) 171, [arXiv:1904.00927]

    2019 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Costello and D

    K. Costello and D. Gaiotto, Twisted Holography, arXiv:1812.09257

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    Bonetti and L

    F. Bonetti and L. Rastelli, Supersymmetric localization in AdS 5 and the protected chiral algebra , JHEP 08 (2018) 098, [ arXiv:1612.06514]

    2018 arXiv

  4. [12]

    M. R. Douglas and G. W. Moore, D-branes, quivers, and ALE instantons , hep-th/9603167

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Landsteiner, E

    K. Landsteiner, E. Lopez, and D. A. Lowe, N=2 supersymmetric gauge theories, branes and orientifolds, Nucl. Phys. B 507 (1997) 197–226, [ hep-th/9705199]

    1997 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Kapustin, D(n) quivers from branes , JHEP 12 (1998) 015, [ hep-th/9806238]

    A. Kapustin, D(n) quivers from branes , JHEP 12 (1998) 015, [ hep-th/9806238]

    1998 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Kakushadze, Gauge theories from orientifolds and large N limit , Nucl

    Z. Kakushadze, Gauge theories from orientifolds and large N limit , Nucl. Phys. B 529 (1998) 157–179, [ hep-th/9803214]. 30

    1998 arXiv

  8. [16]

    A. M. Uranga, Towards mass deformed N=4 SO(n) and Sp(k) gauge theories fro m brane configurations, Nucl. Phys. B 526 (1998) 241–277, [ hep-th/9803054]

    1998 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Park and A

    J. Park and A. M. Uranga, A Note on superconformal N=2 theories and orientifolds , Nucl. Phys. B 542 (1999) 139–156, [ hep-th/9808161]

    1999 arXiv

  10. [18]

    A. M. Uranga, A New orientifold of Cˆ2 / Z N and six-dimensional RG fixed points , Nucl. Phys. B 577 (2000) 73–87, [ hep-th/9910155]

    2000 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Hanany and E

    A. Hanany and E. Witten, Type IIB superstrings, BPS monopoles, and three-dimension al gauge dynamics, Nucl. Phys. B 492 (1997) 152–190, [ hep-th/9611230]

    1997 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Witten, Solutions of four-dimensional field theories via M theory , Nucl

    E. Witten, Solutions of four-dimensional field theories via M theory , Nucl. Phys. B 500 (1997) 3–42, [ hep-th/9703166]

    1997 arXiv

  13. [21]

    S. Katz, P. Mayr, and C. Vafa, Mirror symmetry and exact solution of 4-D N=2 gauge theories : 1., Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 1 (1998) 53–114, [ hep-th/9706110]

    1998 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Kapustin, Solution of N=2 gauge theories via compactification to three -dimensions, Nucl

    A. Kapustin, Solution of N=2 gauge theories via compactification to three -dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 534 (1998) 531–545, [ hep-th/9804069]

    1998 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Gaiotto, N=2 dualities , JHEP 08 (2012) 034, [ arXiv:0904.2715]

    D. Gaiotto, N=2 dualities , JHEP 08 (2012) 034, [ arXiv:0904.2715]

    2012 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Costello and S

    K. Costello and S. Li, Anomaly cancellation in the topological string , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 24 (2020), no. 7 1723–1771, [ arXiv:1905.09269]

    2020 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Sen, F theory and orientifolds , Nucl

    A. Sen, F theory and orientifolds , Nucl. Phys. B 475 (1996) 562–578, [ hep-th/9605150]

    1996 arXiv

  18. [26]

    M. R. Douglas, D. A. Lowe, and J. H. Schwarz, Probing F theory with multiple branes , Phys. Lett. B 394 (1997) 297–301, [ hep-th/9612062]

    1997 arXiv

  19. [27]

    P. C. Argyres, R. Maimon, and S. Pelland, The M theory lift of two 06- planes and four D6-branes, JHEP 05 (2002) 008, [ hep-th/0204127]

    2002 arXiv

  20. [28]

    I. P. Ennes, C. Lozano, S. G. Naculich, and H. J. Schnitzer, Elliptic models, type IIB orientifolds and the AdS / CFT correspondence , Nucl. Phys. B 591 (2000) 195–226, [ hep-th/0006140]

    2000 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Beccaria, M

    M. Beccaria, M. Bill` o, F. Galvagno, A. Hasan, and A. Lerda, N = 2 Conformal SYM theories at large N , JHEP 09 (2020) 116, [ arXiv:2007.02840]

    2020 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Bhardwaj and Y

    L. Bhardwaj and Y. Tachikawa, Classification of 4d N=2 gauge theories , JHEP 12 (2013) 100, [arXiv:1309.5160]. 31

    2013 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Kachru and E

    S. Kachru and E. Silverstein, 4-D conformal theories and strings on orbifolds , Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 4855–4858, [ hep-th/9802183]

    1998 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Witten, Baryons and branes in anti-de Sitter space , JHEP 07 (1998) 006, [ hep-th/9805112]

    E. Witten, Baryons and branes in anti-de Sitter space , JHEP 07 (1998) 006, [ hep-th/9805112]

    1998 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Budzik and D

    K. Budzik and D. Gaiotto, Giant gravitons in twisted holography , JHEP 10 (2023) 131, [arXiv:2106.14859]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    C. Beem, W. Peelaers, L. Rastelli, and B. C. van Rees, Chiral algebras of class S , JHEP 05 (2015) 020, [ arXiv:1408.6522]

    2015 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Arakawa, Chiral algebras of class S and Moore-Tachikawa symplectic varieties , arXiv:1811.01577

    T. Arakawa, Chiral algebras of class S and Moore-Tachikawa symplectic varieties , arXiv:1811.01577. 32

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.