Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 79 references

A Brief Introduction to PACIAE 4.0

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read PACIAE 4.0 is a rewritten, open-source event generator that joins a modern Fortran core with C++-based PYTHIA 8.3 and adds heavy-quark physics to its parton and hadron cascades.

desk verdict PACIAE 4.0 is a plausible, honest code-release paper with real new capabilities, but the core operational claim rests on an unverified Fortran-C++ bridge and no validation, so it needs revision rather than acceptance as is. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14255 v1 pith:B72FSRPV submitted 2024-11-21 hep-ph

An-Ke Lei , Zhi-Lei She , Yu-Liang Yan , Dai-Mei Zhou , Liang Zheng , Wen-Chao Zhang , Hua Zheng , Larissa V. Bravina
show 2 more authors
Evgeny E. Zabrodin Ben-Hao Sa
This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph
keywords eventgeneratorhigh-energycollisionstransportcascademodelpartonicrescatteringhadronicPYTHIA8.3interfaceheavy-quarkcrosssectionscoalescencehadronization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces PACIAE 4.0, a new generation of the PACIAE Monte Carlo event generator used to simulate high-energy particle and nuclear collisions. The central claim is that the code has been rewritten from fixed-format FORTRAN 77 into free-format modern Fortran mixed with C++, and that it now interfaces with the C++-based PYTHIA 8.3 while keeping the older PYTHIA 6.4 as an option. The authors report three physics upgrades in this version: mass-corrected leading-order cross sections for heavy-quark scattering, an improved coalescence hadronization model with gluon splitting and quark deexcitation, and dozens of new inelastic hadron-hadron channels involving strangeness and charm. If the code performs as described, the heavy-ion physics community gains an open-source generator that can start from PYTHIA 8.3 initial states and then evolve partonic and hadronic cascades with better treatment of heavy quarks.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the Fortran-C++ interface module, built on the modern Fortran INTERFACE block, which lets a Fortran main program create and destroy PYTHIA 8.3 objects on the heap and exchange event information with them. This interface is what makes the whole upgrade possible: it is the bridge that lets PACIAE keep its Fortran skeleton while drawing initial states and string fragmentation from the C++ generator. On top of that bridge sit the physics additions that the paper emphasizes: the mass-corrected heavy-quark matrix elements of Eqs. (9) and (10), the gluon-splitting and quark-deexcitation rules of Eqs. (11)-(13) in the coalescence model, and the list of new hadronic reaction channels in Sec. 3.4.1.

What would settle it

A reader could settle the central claim by compiling the released source, running the same pp collision through both the PYTHIA 6.4 and PYTHIA 8.3 modes with identical PACIAE settings, and checking that final multiplicities and spectra agree within generator differences.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors assert that PACIAE 4.0 is the first version of PACIAE to leave FORTRAN 77 and to connect to the C++-based PYTHIA 8.3, using a modern Fortran INTERFACE block to instantiate and delete PYTHIA 8 objects on the heap while a Fortran main program steers the simulation. The release also splits input into a PACIAE control file and separate PYTHIA 6/8 card files, and adds new simulation modes based on PYTHIA 8 and on the Angantyr heavy-ion initial-state model. Physically, PACIAE 4.0 introduces mass-dependent matrix elements for heavy-quark scattering off light quarks and gluons (Qq -> Qq and Qg -> Qg), an improved coalescence model in which gluons split to quark-antiquark pairs sharing the gluon's forward light-cone momentum and energetic quarks deexcite by exciting pairs from the vacuum, and an extended hadronic rescattering stage that includes charmed and strange reaction channels such as J/psi+N, D+pi, and K+Xi. The paper's claim is that these changes make PACIAE 4.0 able to model a wider range of collisions, including heavy-flavor observables, than its predecessor.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's load-bearing premise is that the new Fortran-C++ interface actually compiles and runs with standard toolchains, and that PYTHIA 8.3 events flow into the cascade stages without double-counting nucleon-nucleon collisions or losing normalization.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Users can now generate pp, pA, and AB initial states with PYTHIA 8.3 and feed them into PACIAE's parton and hadron cascades, something earlier PACIAE versions could not do because they were tied to PYTHIA 6.4.
  • The new mass-dependent matrix elements mean charm and bottom quarks are no longer treated as massless in the partonic rescattering stage, which should change heavy-quark energy loss and momentum spectra in simulated events.
  • The improved coalescence hadronization gives an alternative to string fragmentation that produces hadrons from quark-antiquark pair coalescence with phase-space constraints, allowing the model to address heavy-baryon-to-meson ratios.
  • The expanded hadronic rescattering channels cover charmonium dissociation (e.g., J/psi + N, J/psi + pi) and open-charm reactions, which are relevant for interpreting quarkonium suppression and heavy-flavor hadron production in nuclear collisions.
  • The code is released on open-source repositories, so the community can run the PYTHIA 8 mode and compare its output against the PYTHIA 6 mode as a cross-check.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next step, which the paper itself flags, is to replace the PYTHIA 6 decayer with the PYTHIA 8 decayer; until then, the hadron-decay stage remains the only part of the chain still tied to the older generator.
  • Because PYTHIA parameters are now in separate card files, systematic studies of generator tuning are easier to automate; one could, for instance, scan over color-reconnection settings in PYTHIA 8 without touching PACIAE's own parameters.
  • The decoupling of input files also suggests a testable extension: using the same PACIAE cascade settings with PYTHIA 6.4 and PYTHIA 8.3 initial states would isolate how much of any final-state difference comes from the initial-state generator rather than from the cascade physics.
  • If the Fortran-C++ interface proves stable, the same pattern could let PACIAE call other C++-based generators or modules, though the paper does not claim this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript announces PACIAE 4.0, a new release of the PACIAE Monte Carlo event generator. The paper describes a rewrite of the former FORTRAN 77 code in modern Fortran mixed with C++, the addition of a C++-based PYTHIA 8.3 interface alongside the retained PYTHIA 6.4 support, and several physics improvements: heavy-quark mass corrections in parton-parton scattering cross sections, an improved coalescence hadronization model, and additional hadron-hadron reaction channels involving heavy hadrons. The paper also sketches the program flow, lists seven simulation frameworks, and states that the code is publicly available on GitHub and Gitee. The central claim is that PACIAE 4.0 is a working successor to PACIAE 3.0 that 'surpasses' it.

Significance. If the software actually builds and runs as described, PACIAE 4.0 would be a valuable public resource for the heavy-ion and high-energy physics community, connecting the modern PYTHIA 8.3 initial-state generator to the PACIAE parton and hadron cascade stages, with heavy-quark corrections and an expanded hadronic channel set. The availability of the source code on public repositories is a real strength, and the paper is written in the established style of the PACIAE series. However, the paper provides no evidence that the new interface and physics implementations are operational: there are no build instructions, no test outputs, no comparisons with PACIAE 3.0 or experimental data, and no sample event output. The value of a code-release paper rests on the code being usable and correct, and that premise is currently unsupported by the manuscript.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Summary] The claim that PACIAE 4.0 is 'surpassing the version 3.0' is load-bearing but is not supported anywhere in the manuscript. No comparison with PACIAE 3.0 results, no validation against experimental data, and no benchmark of the new physics modules are presented. I recommend either removing 'surpassing' and replacing it with a neutral description of the upgrade, or adding a section with quantitative evidence (e.g., comparisons of particle yields, pT spectra, or cross-section checks).
  2. [Section 2.1, program flow] The Fortran-C++ interface is the most fragile technical component: the paper states that the Fortran main program 'instantiates and deletes PYTHIA 8 objects on the heap' via the modern Fortran INTERFACE block, but no build log, compiler/toolchain version, or minimal working example is provided. I ask the authors to include a short 'Installation and smoke test' subsection reporting the tested compilers (e.g., gfortran and g++ versions), the required PYTHIA 8 version, and the output of a simple run (e.g., a few pp events at a fixed energy) to demonstrate that the described interface actually compiles and runs.
  3. [Sections 3.2.1, 3.3.2, and 3.4.1] The claimed physics improvements — heavy-quark mass corrections in the parton cascade, the improved coalescence model with gluon splitting and quark deexcitation, and the new heavy-hadron reaction channels — are presented only as formulas or reaction lists. There is no evidence that these are implemented in the released code and that they produce reasonable results. For a code paper, at least one demonstrative output is expected, such as a plot of the heavy-quark scattering cross section versus energy, a coalescence-model yield for a known system, or a comparison of a few hadronic observables with PACIAE 3.0 or PYTHIA 8 alone. Without such a check, the reader cannot verify the central claim that the new version works as described.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 1, Introduction] The text says 'the objective-oriented C++'; this should be 'object-oriented C++'.
  2. [Section 2.3, input files] The description of the decoupled input files ('usu.dat', 'pythia6_extra.cfg', 'pythia8_extra.cfg') would be clearer with a short example of each file type or a pointer to the repository for their default contents.
  3. [Section 3.1.2, pA and AB collisions] Equation (2) defines the nuclear density normalization ρ0, but it is not explicitly stated that this is normalized such that the integral over the Woods-Saxon profile equals A; stating this explicitly would remove ambiguity.
  4. [Section 3.3.2, coalescence model] The two free parameters a and b in the Lund deexcitation function, Eq. (13), are introduced without any discussion of their default values or sensitivity; the paper should at least quote typical values and cite the reference for them.
  5. [Section 4, Summary] Since the code is publicly hosted, the paper should give a specific version tag or commit hash used for the described results, so that readers can reproduce the exact state of the code that is being introduced.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: PACIAE 4.0 is a code-release description whose physics inputs are taken from external literature, and self-citations are historical lineage rather than load-bearing derivations.

full rationale

This paper makes no derived predictions that are fitted to data and then presented as validation. The central claims are software-engineering claims: the code has been rewritten in modern Fortran and C++, PYTHIA 8.3 is interfaced, and several physics options are added. The physics content is explicitly imported from external sources: PYTHIA 8.3 for initial states and string fragmentation, Combridge for the heavy-quark matrix elements, Altarelli-Parisi splitting functions for gluon splitting and medium-induced radiation, Donnachie-Landshoff for the total NN cross section, and experimental data or the additive quark model for hadronic cross sections. Self-citations to earlier PACIAE versions appear only as historical context or as pointers to previously described model components, e.g., 'the C-framework inherited from PACIAE 3.0 [19]' and 'a simple phenomenological coalescence model [19]'. These are code lineage references, not circular justifications of the new version's correctness. The absence of build logs, test output, or comparisons with PACIAE 3.0 or experimental data is a legitimate correctness and completeness concern for a code-release paper, but it is not circularity: there is no step where a prediction reduces by definition to a fitted input or where a load-bearing conclusion is guaranteed solely by self-citation. The paper is best assessed on software-verification grounds, not on circularity grounds.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new independent derivations. Its physics inputs are mostly external standard pQCD, Lund, and PYTHIA machinery. The main new choices are unspecified regulators and parameters (µ, a, b, constant cross sections for missing data) and model-specific simplifications such as neglecting Fermi motion, fixing the event-plane angle, and using a particular stability definition. The claimed added value is software integration and feature expansion, not new theory.

free parameters (4)
  • Debye screening cut-off µ = not specified
    Used in Eq. (8) to regulate the t to 0 singularity in parton-parton scattering integrals; its value controls the parton cascade rate and is not given in the paper.
  • Lund deexcitation parameters a and b = not specified
    Eq. (13) explicitly calls a and b 'two free parameters' in the coalescence-model quark deexcitation; no values or tuning procedure are provided.
  • Constant cross sections for hadronic channels with missing data = not specified
    Section 3.4.1 states that channels with missing data use assumed constant cross sections; the numerical values are not listed, so they are undocumented inputs to the hadron cascade.
  • Effective quark-number weights in additive quark model = neff = nd + nu + 0.6 ns + 0.2 nc + 0.07 nb
    Eq. (16) uses flavor-dependent weights to estimate hadronic cross sections when data are missing; the weights come from prior AQM literature, not from a fit in this paper.
assumptions (8)
  • standard math LO pQCD 2 to 2 parton matrix elements and heavy-quark mass corrections
    Section 3.2.1 uses matrix elements from Combridge [59,60]; these are external standard theory, not derived in the paper.
  • domain assumption Collision criterion d_min <= sqrt(sigma_tot/pi) with Donnachie-Landshoff total cross section
    Eqs. (4) and (5) in Section 3.1.2 assume a geometric collision criterion based on the total NN cross section and the DL parameterization for all cascade stages.
  • domain assumption Woods-Saxon nuclear geometry with fixed r0 = 1.12 fm, d = 0.54 fm, and maximum radius 10 fm
    Section 3.1.2 adopts standard nuclear geometry parameters; they are inputs from prior literature and are not validated or fitted in this paper.
  • domain assumption Neglect of Fermi motion and fixed event-plane angle phi_b = 0 in nucleus-nucleus initialization
    Section 3.1.2 sets transverse nucleon momenta to zero and fixes the impact parameter angle, which simplifies the initial state but is not checked against data.
  • domain assumption No heavy quark-heavy quark scattering and no thermal heavy quark production
    Section 3.2.1 states these processes are neglected, limiting the heavy-flavor reach of the parton cascade.
  • domain assumption Stability criterion: particles with mean proper lifetime greater than 1 cm/c are stable; unstable products of rescattering survive until the end
    Section 3.4.2 defines which particles are stable and delays decays, a modeling simplification that changes final-state particle content.
  • ad hoc to paper Energetic quarks iteratively excite q-qbar pairs from the vacuum using the Lund deexcitation form
    Section 3.3.2 introduces this mechanism to build the special quarks-antiquarks initial state; it is model-specific and not independently established.
  • domain assumption Coalescence phase-space constraint with fixed degeneracy d = 4
    Eq. (15) uses a phenomenological phase-space volume with d = 4 for spin and parity degeneracy; it is an input choice, not derived in the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Brief Introduction to PACIAE 4.0." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B72FSRPV

@misc{pith2026241114255,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Brief Introduction to PACIAE 4.0},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/B72FSRPV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14255}
}
read the original abstract

Parton And-hadron China Institute of Atomic Energy (PACIAE) is a multipurpose Monte Carlo event generator developed to describe a wide range of high-energy collisions, including lepton-lepton, lepton-hadron, lepton-nucleus, hadron-hadron, hadron-nucleus, and nucleus-nucleus collisions. It is built based on the PYTHIA program, and incorporates parton and hadron cascades to address the nuclear medium effects. PACIAE 4.0 is the new generation of PACIAE model surpassing the version 3.0. In PACIAE 4.0, the old fixed-format FORTRAN 77 code has been refactored and rewritten by the free-format modern Fortran and C++ languages. The C++-based PYTHIA 8.3 is interfaced in, while previous versions connected to the Fortran-based PYTHIA 6.4 only. Several improvements are also introduced, which enable PACIAE 4.0 to contain more physics and features to model the high-energy collisions. This is the first attempt to transition PACIAE from Fortran to C++.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.14255 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The program flow of PACIAE 4.0 when the PYTHIA 8 is chosen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Andersson, A

    B. Andersson, A. Tai, B.-H. Sa, Final state interactions in the (n uclear) FRITIOF string interaction scenario, Z. Phys. C 70 (1996) 499–50 6. doi:10.1007/s002880050127

    work page doi:10.1007/s002880050127 1996

  2. [2]

    B. H. Sa, A. Tai, An Event generator for the firecracker model and the rescattering in high-energy p A and A-A collisions: LU- CIAE version 2.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 90 (1995) 121–140. doi:10.1016/0010-4655(95)00066-O

    work page doi:10.1016/0010-4655(95)00066-o 1995

  3. [3]

    LUCIAE 3.0: A new version of a computer program for Firecracker Model and rescattering in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    A. Tai, B.-H. Sa, LUCIAE 3.0: A New version of a com- puter program for firecracker model and rescattering in relativis tic heavy ion collisions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 116 (1999) 353–365. arXiv:nucl-th/9804001, doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(98)00138-6

    work page Pith review arXiv 1999

  4. [4]

    Pi, An Event generator for interactions between hadrons an d nu- clei: FRITIOF version 7.0, Comput

    H. Pi, An Event generator for interactions between hadrons an d nu- clei: FRITIOF version 7.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 71 (1992) 173–1 92. doi:10.1016/0010-4655(92)90082-A

    work page doi:10.1016/0010-4655(92)90082-a 1992

  5. [5]

    Andersson, G

    B. Andersson, G. Gustafson, H. Pi, The FRITIOF model for very high-energy hadronic collisions, Z. Phys. C 57 (1993) 485–494 . doi:10.1007/BF01474343

    doi:10.1007/bf01474343 1993

  6. [6]

    Sjostrand, High-energy physics event generation with PYTH IA 5.7 and JETSET 7.4, Comput

    T. Sjostrand, High-energy physics event generation with PYTH IA 5.7 and JETSET 7.4, Comput. Phys. Commun. 82 (1994) 74–90. doi:10.1016/0010-4655(94)90132-5

    doi:10.1016/0010-4655(94)90132-5 1994

  7. [7]

    Lonnblad, ARIADNE version 4: A Program for simulation of QCD cascades implementing the color dipole model, Comput

    L. Lonnblad, ARIADNE version 4: A Program for simulation of QCD cascades implementing the color dipole model, Comput. Phys. Commun . 71 (1992) 15–31. doi:10.1016/0010-4655(92)90068-A

    doi:10.1016/0010-4655(92)90068-a 1992

  8. [8]

    B.-H. Sa, X. Cai, A. Tai, D.-M. Zhou, Behavior of charge fluctuatio ns in relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions, Phys. Rev. C 66 (2002) 0449 02. arXiv:nucl-th/0112038, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.66.044902

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    Sjostrand, P

    T. Sjostrand, P. Eden, C. Friberg, L. Lonnblad, G. Miu, S. Mren na, E. Norrbin, High-energy physics event generation with PYTHIA 6.1, Comput. Phys. Commun. 135 (2001) 238–259. arXiv:hep-ph/0010017, doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(00)00236-8 . 15

    2001 arXiv

  2. [10]

    B.-H. Sa, A. Bonasera, Influence of the partonic Pauli blocking on the hadronic final state in relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions, Phys. R ev. C 70 (2004) 034904. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.70.034904

    2004 doi

  3. [11]

    Sa, D.-M

    B.-H. Sa, D.-M. Zhou, Z.-G. Tan, Charge particle universal rapid - ity scaling in e+ e-, anti-p + p and Au + Au collisions at relativis- tic energies and its partonic origin, J. Phys. G 32 (2006) 243–250. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/32/3/001

    2006 doi

  4. [12]

    Zhou, X.-M

    D.-M. Zhou, X.-M. Li, B.-G. Dong, B.-H. Sa, Discrepancy between hadron matter and quark-gluon matter in net charge transfer flu ctu- ation, Phys. Lett. B 638 (2006) 461–463. arXiv:nucl-th/0602020, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.06.023

    2006 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Sa, D.-M

    B.-H. Sa, D.-M. Zhou, Y.-L. Yan, X.-M. Li, S.-Q. Feng, B.-G. Dong, X. Cai, PACIAE 2.0: An Updated parton and hadron cas- cade model (program) for the relativistic nuclear collisions, Com- put. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 333–346. arXiv:1104.1238, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2011.08.021

    2012 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Sa, D.-M

    B.-H. Sa, D.-M. Zhou, Y.-L. Yan, B.-G. Dong, X. Cai, PACIAE 2.1: An updated issue of the parton and hadron cascade model PACIAE 2.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 1476–1479. arXiv:1206.4795, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2012.12.026

    2013 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Zhou, Y.-L

    D.-M. Zhou, Y.-L. Yan, X.-L. Li, X.-M. Li, B.-G. Dong, X. Cai, B.-H. S a, An upgraded issue of the parton and hadron cascade model, PACIA E 2.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 193 (2015) 89–94. arXiv:1412.7579, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.022

    2015 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Yan, D.-M

    Y.-L. Yan, D.-M. Zhou, X. Cai, B.-H. Sa, Announcement for the r e- placement of the PACIAE 2.1 and PACIAE 2.2 series, Comput. Phys. Commun. 224 (2018) 417–418. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2017.10.006

    2018 doi

  9. [17]

    She, D.-M

    Z.-L. She, D.-M. Zhou, Y.-L. Yan, L. Zheng, H.-g. Xu, G. Chen, B .-H. Sa, PACIAE 2.2.1: An updated issue of the parton and hadron cas- cade model PACIAE 2.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 274 (2022) 10828 9. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108289

    2022

  10. [18]

    Yan, D.-M

    Y.-L. Yan, D.-M. Zhou, A.-K. Lei, X.-M. Li, X.-M. Zhang, L. Zheng, G. Chen, X. Cai, B.-H. Sa, Revisiting the centrality definition and 16 observable centrality dependence of relativistic heavy-ion collisions in PACIAE model, Comput. Phys. Commun. 284 (2023) 108615. arXiv:2212.0...

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Lei, Y.-L

    A.-K. Lei, Y.-L. Yan, D.-M. Zhou, Z.-L. She, L. Zheng, G.-C. Yong , X.-M. Li, G. Chen, X. Cai, B.-H. Sa, Introduction to the parton and hadron cascade model PACIAE 3.0, Phys. Rev. C 108 (6) (2023) 06 4909. arXiv:2309.05110, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.108.064909

    2023 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Sjostrand, S

    T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, P. Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual, JHEP 05 (2006) 026. arXiv:hep-ph/0603175, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/026

    2006 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Sjostrand, S

    T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, P. Z. Skands, A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178 (2008) 852–867. arXiv:0710.3820, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2008.01.036

    2008 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Sj¨ ostrand, S

    T. Sj¨ ostrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desa i, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C. O. Rasmussen, P. Z. Skands, An introdu c- tion to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159–177. arXiv:1410.3012, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024

    2015 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Bierlich, et al., A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3, SciPost Phys

    C. Bierlich, et al., A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3, SciPost Phys. Codeb. 2022 (2022) 8. arXiv:2203.11601, doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.8

    2022 arXiv

  16. [24]

    S. G. Weber, A. Dubla, A. Andronic, A. Morsch, Elucidating the m ul- tiplicity dependence of J /ψ production in proton–proton collisions with PYTHIA8, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (1) (2019) 36. arXiv:1811.07744, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6531-4

    2019 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Acharya, et al., Multiplicity dependence of J/ ψ production at midra- pidity in pp collisions at √ s = 13 TeV, Phys

    S. Acharya, et al., Multiplicity dependence of J/ ψ production at midra- pidity in pp collisions at √ s = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 810 (2020) 135758. arXiv:2005.11123, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135758

    2020 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Vermunt, Measurement of Λ c baryons and D + s mesons in Pb–Pb colli- sions with ALICE, PoS EPS-HEP2019 (2020) 297

    L. Vermunt, Measurement of Λ c baryons and D + s mesons in Pb–Pb colli- sions with ALICE, PoS EPS-HEP2019 (2020) 297. arXiv:1910.11738, doi:10.22323/1.364.0297

    2020 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Acharya, et al., Λ + c Production and Baryon-to-Meson Ra- tios in pp and p-Pb Collisions at √ sN N=5.02 TeV at the LHC, 17 Phys

    S. Acharya, et al., Λ + c Production and Baryon-to-Meson Ra- tios in pp and p-Pb Collisions at √ sN N=5.02 TeV at the LHC, 17 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (20) (2021) 202301. arXiv:2011.06078, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.202301

    2021 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Acharya, et al., Observation of a multiplicity dependence in the pT- differential charm baryon-to-meson ratios in proton–proton collis ions at s=13 TeV, Phys

    S. Acharya, et al., Observation of a multiplicity dependence in the pT- differential charm baryon-to-meson ratios in proton–proton collis ions at s=13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 829 (2022) 137065. arXiv:2111.11948, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137065

    2022 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Bierlich, G

    C. Bierlich, G. Gustafson, L. L¨ onnblad, H. Shah, The dy- namic hadronization of charm quarks in heavy-ion collisions, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (3) (2024) 231. arXiv:2309.12452, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12593-0

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Corke, T

    R. Corke, T. Sjostrand, Interleaved Parton Showers and Tu n- ing Prospects, JHEP 03 (2011) 032. arXiv:1011.1759, doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2011)032

    2011 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Alver, M

    B. Alver, M. Baker, C. Loizides, P. Steinberg, The PHOBOS Glaub er Monte Carlo (5 2008). arXiv:0805.4411

    2008 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Loizides, J

    C. Loizides, J. Nagle, P. Steinberg, Improved version of the PH OBOS Glauber Monte Carlo, SoftwareX 1-2 (2015) 13–18. arXiv:1408.2549, doi:10.1016/j.softx.2015.05.001

    2015 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Loizides, J

    C. Loizides, J. Kamin, D. d’Enterria, Improved Monte Carlo Glaub er predictions at present and future nuclear colliders, Phys. Rev. C 97 (5) (2018) 054910, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 99, 019901 (2019)]. arXiv:1710.07098, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.054910

    2018 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Donnachie, P

    A. Donnachie, P. V. Landshoff, Total cross-sections, Phys. Lett. B 296 (1992) 227–232. arXiv:hep-ph/9209205, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)90832-O

    1992 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Bierlich, G

    C. Bierlich, G. Gustafson, L. L¨ onnblad, H. Shah, The Anganty r model for Heavy-Ion Collisions in PYTHIA8, JHEP 10 (2018) 134. arXiv:1806.10820, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2018)134

    2018 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Nilsson-Almqvist, E

    B. Nilsson-Almqvist, E. Stenlund, Interactions Between Hadro ns and Nuclei: The Lund Monte Carlo, Fritiof Version 1.6, Comput. Phys. Commun. 43 (1987) 387. doi:10.1016/0010-4655(87)90056-7. 18

    1987 doi

  29. [37]

    Broniowski, M

    W. Broniowski, M. Rybczynski, P. Bozek, GLISSANDO: Glauber initial-state simulation and more.., Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009 ) 69–83. arXiv:0710.5731, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2008.07.016

    2009 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Rybczynski, G

    M. Rybczynski, G. Stefanek, W. Broniowski, P. Bozek, GLISSA NDO 2 : GLauber Initial-State Simulation AND mOre. . . , ver. 2, Com- put. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 1759–1772. arXiv:1310.5475, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.02.016

    2014 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Alvioli, M

    M. Alvioli, M. Strikman, Color fluctuation effects in proton-nucleu s collisions, Phys. Lett. B 722 (2013) 347–354. arXiv:1301.0728, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.04.042

    2013 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Zheng, G.-H

    L. Zheng, G.-H. Zhang, Y.-F. Liu, Z.-W. Lin, Q.-Y. Shou, Z.-B. Yin, Investigating high energy proton proton collisions with a multi- phase transport model approach based on PYTHIA8 initial con- ditions, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (8) (2021) 755. arXiv:2104.05998, doi:10.1140/epjc/s100...

    2021 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Zheng, L

    L. Zheng, L. Liu, Z.-W. Lin, Q.-Y. Shou, Z.-B. Yin, Disentangling th e development of collective flow in high energy proton proton collisions with a multiphase transport model, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (10) (2024) 1 029. arXiv:2404.18829, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13378-1

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Arsene, et al., Quark gluon plasma and color glass con- densate at RHIC? The Perspective from the BRAHMS experi- ment, Nucl

    I. Arsene, et al., Quark gluon plasma and color glass con- densate at RHIC? The Perspective from the BRAHMS experi- ment, Nucl. Phys. A 757 (2005) 1–27. arXiv:nucl-ex/0410020, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.02.130

    2005 arXiv

  35. [43]

    B. B. Back, et al., The PHOBOS perspective on discoveries at RHIC, Nucl. Phys. A 757 (2005) 28–101. arXiv:nucl-ex/0410022, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.084

    2005 arXiv

  36. [44]

    J. Adams, et al., Experimental and theoretical challenges in the search for the quark gluon plasma: The STAR Collabora- tion’s critical assessment of the evidence from RHIC collisions, Nucl. Phys. A 757 (2005) 102–183. arXiv:nucl-ex/0501009, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.085

    2005 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Adcox, et al., Formation of dense partonic matter in rela- tivistic nucleus-nucleus collisions at RHIC: Experimental evaluation 19 by the PHENIX collaboration, Nucl

    K. Adcox, et al., Formation of dense partonic matter in rela- tivistic nucleus-nucleus collisions at RHIC: Experimental evaluation 19 by the PHENIX collaboration, Nucl. Phys. A 757 (2005) 184–283. arXiv:nucl-ex/0410003, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.086

    2005 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Aamodt, et al., Elliptic flow of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV, Phys

    K. Aamodt, et al., Elliptic flow of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 252302. arXiv:1011.3914, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.252302

    2010 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Aamodt, et al., Suppression of Charged Particle Production a t Large Transverse Momentum in Central Pb-Pb Collisions at √ sN N = 2.76 TeV, Phys

    K. Aamodt, et al., Suppression of Charged Particle Production a t Large Transverse Momentum in Central Pb-Pb Collisions at √ sN N = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 696 (2011) 30–39. arXiv:1012.1004, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.12.020

    2011 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Aad, et al., Observation of a Centrality-Dependent Dijet Asy mmetry in Lead-Lead Collisions at √ sN N = 2.77 TeV with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC, Phys

    G. Aad, et al., Observation of a Centrality-Dependent Dijet Asy mmetry in Lead-Lead Collisions at √ sN N = 2.77 TeV with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 252303. arXiv:1011.6182, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.252303

    2010 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Chatrchyan, et al., Observation and studies of jet quench- ing in PbPb collisions at nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy = 2.76 TeV, Phys

    S. Chatrchyan, et al., Observation and studies of jet quench- ing in PbPb collisions at nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Rev. C 84 (2011) 024906. arXiv:1102.1957, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.84.024906

    2011 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Geiger, B

    K. Geiger, B. Muller, Dynamics of parton cascades in highly relativistic nuclear collisions, Nucl. Phys. B 369 (1992) 600–654. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(92)90280-O

    1992 doi

  43. [51]

    Zhang, ZPC 1.0.1: A Parton cascade for ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions, Comput

    B. Zhang, ZPC 1.0.1: A Parton cascade for ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 109 (1998) 193–206. arXiv:nucl-th/9709009, doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(98)00010-1

    1998 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Z.-W. Lin, C. M. Ko, B.-A. Li, B. Zhang, S. Pal, A Multi-phase trans port model for relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 72 (2005) 064 901. arXiv:nucl-th/0411110, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.72.064901

    2005 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Borchers, J

    V. Borchers, J. Meyer, S. Gieseke, G. Martens, C. C. Noack, A Poincare covariant parton cascade model for ultrarelativistic hea vy ion reactions, Phys. Rev. C 62 (2000) 064903. arXiv:hep-ph/0006038, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.62.064903. 20

    2000 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Y. Nara, A. Jinno, T. Maruyama, K. Murase, A. Ohnishi, Poincar´ e covariant cascade method for high-energy nuclear colli- sions, Phys. Rev. C 108 (2) (2023) 024910. arXiv:2306.12131, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.108.024910

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Z. Xu, C. Greiner, Thermalization of gluons in ultrarelativistic hea vy ion collisions by including three-body interactions in a parton cas- cade, Phys. Rev. C 71 (2005) 064901. arXiv:hep-ph/0406278, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.71.064901

    2005 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Cassing, E

    W. Cassing, E. L. Bratkovskaya, Parton-Hadron-String Dy- namics: an off-shell transport approach for relativistic ener- gies, Nucl. Phys. A 831 (2009) 215–242. arXiv:0907.5331, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2009.09.007

    2009 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Schenke, C

    B. Schenke, C. Gale, S. Jeon, MARTINI: An Event generator f or relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 80 (2009) 054913. arXiv:0909.2037, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.80.054913

    2009 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Kurkela, R

    A. Kurkela, R. T¨ ornkvist, K. Zapp, AMY Lorentz invariant par ton cas- cade – the thermal equilibrium case, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (1) (2024) 7 4. arXiv:2211.15454, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12424-2

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    B. L. Combridge, J. Kripfganz, J. Ranft, Hadron Production a t Large Transverse Momentum and QCD, Phys. Lett. B 70 (1977) 23 4. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(77)90528-7

    1977 doi

  52. [60]

    B. L. Combridge, Associated Production of Heavy Flavor State s in p p and anti-p p Interactions: Some QCD Estimates, Nucl. Phys. B 151 (1979) 429–456. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90449-8

    1979 doi

  53. [61]

    J. D. Bjorken, Energy Loss of Energetic Partons in Quark-Glu on Plasma: Possible Extinction Tech. Rep. FERMILAB-PUB-82-059-T, FERMILAB (1982). URL http://lss.fnal.gov/archive/preprint/fermilab-pub-82-059-t.shtml

    1982

  54. [62]

    Gyulassy, M

    M. Gyulassy, M. Plumer, Jet Quenching in Dense Matter, Phys. L ett. B 243 (1990) 432–438. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)91409-5

    1990 doi

  55. [63]

    B. R. Webber, Monte Carlo Simulation of Hard Hadronic Processes, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 36 (1986) 253–286. doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.36.120186.001345. 21

    1986

  56. [64]

    V. V. Sudakov, Vertex parts at very high-energies in quantum electro- dynamics, Sov. Phys. JETP 3 (1956) 65–71

    1956

  57. [65]

    Altarelli, G

    G. Altarelli, G. Parisi, Asymptotic Freedom in Parton Language, N ucl. Phys. B 126 (1977) 298–318. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90384-4

    1977 doi

  58. [66]

    Minissale, S

    V. Minissale, S. Plumari, V. Greco, Charm hadrons in pp colli- sions at LHC energy within a coalescence plus fragmentation ap- proach, Phys. Lett. B 821 (2021) 136622. arXiv:2012.12001, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136622

    2021

  59. [67]

    Plumari, V

    S. Plumari, V. Minissale, S. K. Das, G. Coci, V. Greco, Charmed Hadrons from Coalescence plus Fragmentation in relativistic nucleus - nucleus collisions at RHIC and LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (4) (2018) 348 . arXiv:1712.00730, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5828-7

    2018 arXiv

  60. [68]

    T. Song, H. Berrehrah, D. Cabrera, J. M. Torres-Rincon, L. To- los, W. Cassing, E. Bratkovskaya, Tomography of the Quark-Gluo n- Plasma by Charm Quarks, Phys. Rev. C 92 (1) (2015) 014910. arXiv:1503.03039, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.92.014910

    2015 arXiv

  61. [69]

    T. Song, H. Berrehrah, D. Cabrera, W. Cassing, E. Bratkovs kaya, Charm production in Pb + Pb collisions at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C 93 (3) (2016) 034906. arXiv:1512.00891, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.93.034906

    2016 arXiv

  62. [70]

    M. He, R. J. Fries, R. Rapp, Heavy-Quark Diffusion and Hadroniz a- tion in Quark-Gluon Plasma, Phys. Rev. C 86 (2012) 014903. arXiv:1106.6006, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.86.014903

    2012 arXiv

  63. [71]

    M. He, R. Rapp, Hadronization and Charm-Hadron Ratios in Heav y-Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (4) (2020) 042301. arXiv:1905.09216, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.042301

    2020 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Zhao, et al., Hadronization of heavy quarks, Phys

    J. Zhao, et al., Hadronization of heavy quarks, Phys. Rev. C 109 (5) (2024) 054912. arXiv:2311.10621, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.109.054912

    2024 arXiv

  65. [73]

    W. Zhao, C. M. Ko, Y.-X. Liu, G.-Y. Qin, H. Song, Probing the Part onic Degrees of Freedom in High-Multiplicity p − Pb collisions at √ sN N = 22 5.02 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (7) (2020) 072301. arXiv:1911.00826, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.072301

    2020 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Y. Wang, W. Zhao, H. Song, Exploring the partonic collectivity in s mall systems at the LHC (12 2023). arXiv:2401.00913

    2023 arXiv

  67. [75]

    P. Koch, B. Muller, J. Rafelski, Strangeness in Relativis- tic Heavy Ion Collisions, Phys. Rept. 142 (1986) 167–262. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(86)90096-7

    1986 doi

  68. [76]

    Baldini, V

    A. Baldini, V. Flaminio, W. G. Moorhead, D. R. O. Morrison, Total Cross-Sections for Reactions of High Energy Particles (Including E las- tic, Topological, Inclusive and Exclusive Reactions) / Totale Wirkungs - querschnitte f¨ ur Reaktionen hochenergetischer Teilchen (einsc hl...

    1988 doi

  69. [77]

    E. M. Levin, L. L. Frankfurt, The Quark hypothesis and relatio ns be- tween cross-sections at high-energies, JETP Lett. 2 (1965) 65– 70

    1965

  70. [78]

    H. J. Lipkin, Quarks for pedestrians, Phys. Rept. 8 (1973) 17 3–268. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(73)90002-1

    1973 doi

  71. [79]

    https://cds.cern.ch/record/2270008

    ALICE Collaboration, The ALICE definition of primary particles, ALICE-PUBLIC-2017-005. https://cds.cern.ch/record/2270008. 23

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.