Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Guiding Reinforcement Learning Using Uncertainty-Aware Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.14457 v1 pith:WA6LMMN4 submitted 2024-11-15 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords guidancellmsuncertaintyaveragecalibratedentropyenvironmenthuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Human guidance in reinforcement learning (RL) is often impractical for large-scale applications due to high costs and time constraints. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a promising alternative to mitigate RL sample inefficiency and potentially replace human trainers. However, applying LLMs as RL trainers is challenging due to their overconfidence and less reliable solutions in sequential tasks. We address this limitation by introducing a calibrated guidance system that uses Monte Carlo Dropout to enhance LLM advice reliability by assessing prediction variances from multiple forward passes. Additionally, we develop a novel RL policy shaping method based on dynamic model average entropy to adjust the LLM's influence on RL policies according to guidance uncertainty. This approach ensures robust RL training by relying on reliable LLM guidance. To validate our contributions, we conduct extensive experiments in a Minigrid environment with three goals in varying environment sizes. The results showcase superior model performance compared to uncalibrated LLMs, unguided RL, and calibrated LLMs with different shaping policies. Moreover, we analyze various uncertainty estimation methods, demonstrating the effectiveness of average entropy in reflecting higher uncertainty in incorrect guidance. These findings highlight the persistent overconfidence in fine-tuned LLMs and underscore the importance of effective calibration in sequential decision-making problems.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLaPipe: LLM-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Automated Data Preparation Pipeline Construction

    cs.DB 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A framework that uses LLM suggestions, retrieved past experience, and adaptive triggering to speed up RL search for data preprocessing pipelines, showing improved accuracy on 18 tabular datasets.

Pith tools