Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 55 references

First-Principles Insights into the Site Occupancy of Ta-Fe-Al C14 Laves Phases

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Aluminum consistently prefers the 2a sites in Ta(Fe$_{1-x}$Al$_x$)$_2$ C14 Laves phases, and Ta$_4$Fe$_2$Al$_6$ is the only composition predicted stable at 0 K.

desk verdict Solid, systematic DFT site-occupancy study of Ta-Fe-Al Laves phases with a robust 2a preference, but the untested Al-on-4f substitution and an incomplete binary hull leave the Ta4Fe2Al6 stability claim not fully closed. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14575 v2 pith:57SPM423 submitted 2024-11-21 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Nisa Ulumuddin , Sandra Korte-Kerzel , Zhuocheng Xie This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords LavesphaseTa-Fe-AlalloyssiteoccupancydensityfunctionaltheoryC14structure2aWyckoffdefectdiagram
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses density functional theory to establish where aluminum atoms sit in the Ta-Fe-Al C14 Laves phase, a hard intermetallic precipitate used to toughen iron-based alloys. The central claim is that aluminum has a consistent site preference: it fills the two 2a Wyckoff sites first, and only then substitutes into the six 6h Kagomé-layer sites, with symmetric filling of the two Kagomé layers preferred. The paper also claims that, at the stoichiometric 33.3 at.% Ta composition, Ta$_4$Fe$_2$Al$_6$ is the only thermodynamically stable ternary structure at 0 K, exactly matching the experimentally observed solubility limit of 52 at.% Al. If correct, the result turns a trial-and-error alloying element into a predictable filling sequence, and gives a geometric descriptor for spotting favorable configurations.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is an exhaustive permutation of aluminum atoms over the two iron sublattices of the C14 cell — the two 2a sites inside the triple layers and the six 6h sites of the Kagomé nets — with magnetic spin arrangements also permuted, all relaxed by density functional theory. The argument is carried by comparing formation energies of every decoration and then mapping those energies onto a metastable defect phase diagram, which treats each composition as a defect motif in an open system and ranges the aluminum chemical potential between experimentally fixed phase boundaries. The favored geometric descriptor is the ratio $z_{2a-6h}/z'_{2a-6h}$, the spacing of the Kagomé layers above and below the 2a atom; values near 1 identify the symmetric layer-filling patterns that correlate with the lowest-energy motifs.

What would settle it

A single DFT calculation that relaxes an aluminum atom on a tantalum position in any Ta(Fe$_{1-x}$Al$_x$)$_2$ cell and finds its energy below the paper's lowest-energy 2a/6h configuration for the same composition would falsify the claimed 2a preference. Experimentally, atom-probe tomography or site-sensitive diffraction showing a measurable aluminum fraction on the tantalum sublattice in Ta-Fe-Al samples would contradict the predicted site-occupancy map.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is a filling rule for aluminum in Ta(Fe$_{1-x}$Al$_x$)$_2$ C14 Laves phases: independent of composition up to 50 at.% Al, the lowest-energy configurations place aluminum at the 2a sites, fully occupying them before and while filling the 6h sites, with aluminum spread symmetrically between the two Kagomé layers rather than concentrated in one. Magnetic ordering matters less than site occupancy: antiferromagnetic alignment between neighboring Kagomé layers is the usual ground state, with ferromagnetic variants only slightly higher in energy. The only composition predicted to sit on the 0 K convex hull (the set of compositions that cannot decompose into other phases) is Ta$_4$Fe$_2$Al$_6$, which corresponds to full 2a substitution and two-thirds of the 6h sites replaced, and it shows no imaginary phonon modes. A metastable defect phase diagram built from the aluminum chemical potential shows Ta$_4$Fe$_6$Al$_2$ and Ta$_4$Fe$_2$Al$_6$ dominating the widest windows, with Ta$_4$Fe$_2$Al$_6$ prevailing at the aluminum-rich end.

Load-bearing premise

Aluminum was only ever placed on the iron sublattice, at the 2a and 6h positions; the search never tried putting aluminum on the tantalum position. If aluminum can partially occupy those tantalum sites, the predicted site preferences and the stability of Ta$_4$Fe$_2$Al$_6$ would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Aluminum content in Ta(Fe,Al)$_2$ can be rationalized as a two-stage sequence: 2a sites fill first, then 6h sites fill symmetrically, so alloys with fully occupied 2a sites should be the most common in samples.
  • Ta$_4$Fe$_2$Al$_6$ is predicted to be the stable endpoint of the solid solution at 0 K, and its phonon stability supports existence at finite temperature, so a single-phase sample at 52 at.% Al should be attainable if kinetics allow.
  • Magnetism shifts formation energies by only about 0.2% compared with site-occupancy differences, so the site-preference ordering would likely survive a nonmagnetic treatment, but the antiferromagnetic ground state would be missed.
  • The interlayer distance ratio $z_{2a-6h}/z'_{2a-6h}$ can serve as a cheap screening descriptor: configurations with symmetric aluminum distributions across the Kagomé layers are the low-energy ones for even aluminum counts.
  • Compositions such as Ta$_4$Fe$_3$Al$_5$ occupy only a narrow chemical-potential window near $-0.6$ eV, implying that intermediate motifs are transition states before the Ta$_4$Fe$_2$Al$_6$ phase stabilizes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper only permutes aluminum over iron sites, so a natural next calculation is to test aluminum on a tantalum position, especially at the aluminum-rich end; the 2a-preference conclusion would need revision if that substitution became competitive.
  • If the filling rule transfers to isostructural Nb-Fe-Al or Ti-Fe-Al C14 phases, the same 2a-then-6h sequence plus symmetric Kagomé filling could become a general design rule for ternary Laves phases; the paper's comparison with Ti-Fe-Al hints at this but does not establish it.
  • The narrow chemical-potential window around $-0.6$ eV suggests that intermediate compositions are kinetic transients rather than equilibrium phases, so controlled cooling or deposition experiments near the Al-rich boundary could test whether those motifs appear as transition states.
  • Applying the same metastable defect-phase-diagram method to other alloying elements in Laves phases could replace trial-and-error alloy development with computed chemical-potential maps for site occupancy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a density functional theory study of Al site occupancy in C14 Ta(Fe1-xAlx)2 Laves phases at 33.3 at.% Ta, for Al contents from 0 to 50 at.%. Within a 12-atom conventional cell, the authors enumerate B-site (2a and 6h) Al decorations and several collinear Fe magnetic orderings, identify the lowest-energy configurations, and find that Al strongly prefers the 2a sites and, at higher contents, distributes symmetrically between the two Kagome layers. They construct a 0 K convex hull for the Ta-Fe-Al system, from which they conclude that Ta4Fe2Al6 is the only stable ternary C14 structure, and they build a metastable defect phase diagram as a function of Al chemical potential using experimental phase boundaries as constraints. They also analyze lattice-distortion descriptors and compare computed lattice constants with experimental X-ray data.

Significance. If the conclusions hold, the paper provides a concrete prediction for an ordered C14 phase, Ta4Fe2Al6, at the experimentally observed Al solubility limit, together with a site-occupancy rule (Al fills 2a before 6h, with symmetric Kagome-layer filling) that could guide alloy design in Ta-Fe-Al and related systems. The work has several genuine strengths: the DFT setup is standard and well documented (VASP/PBE/PAW, 550 eV cutoff, 10x10x5 k-grid, full relaxation); the configurational enumeration within the 12-atom cell is exhaustive for the chosen sublattice and magnetic orderings; no target quantity is fitted, and the chemical-potential windows are constrained by experimental phase boundaries used as input, not as fitted outputs; and the resulting lattice constants are compared directly with experiment. The central site-occupancy and stability claims are, however, conditional on a few load-bearing assumptions that are not tested in the current manuscript.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, Table A1] The configurational search restricts Al substitution to the B sublattice, motivated by Refs. [22,37,20], but no calculation for Ta-Fe-Al is presented that tests A-site (4f) occupancy by Al. This assumption is not self-evident here because the metallic radius of Al is close to that of Ta. A symmetry-allowed configuration at the decisive Ta4Fe2Al6 composition with one Al on 4f, one Ta on 2a, and 2 Fe + 4 Al on 6h preserves the overall composition and is absent from Table A1. If this antistructure were lower in energy than the reported 2a(Al,Al)6h(FeAlAl,FeAlAl) ground state, both the 2a-preference rule of Section 3.1 and the hull stability of Ta4Fe2Al6 in Section 3.3 would be invalid. Please add this configuration, and preferably a dilute Al-on-4f test, to the enumeration.
  2. [Figure A1 caption, Section 3.3] The caption of Figure A1 explicitly states that not all binary Fe-Al stable phases are included in the convex-hull construction, and the text asserts that the omitted phases will not contribute further to the stability of the ternary C14 phases, but no evidence is given for this assertion. If a missing binary, for example FeAl or another ordered Fe-Al phase, forms a tie line with Ta4Fe2Al6, then the conclusion that Ta4Fe2Al6 is the only stable ternary C14 structure would not follow from the computed hull. Please recompute the ternary hull with a complete set of DFT-relaxed Fe-Al binaries, including the experimentally known ordered phases, and report the decomposition products that result.
  3. [Section 3.1 and Section 3.3, Table A1] All configurational energies and the hull placement are based on a single 12-atom conventional cell, and no supercell-size convergence test is reported for the site-occupancy energy differences. Since the stability claim for Ta4Fe2Al6 rests on energy differences on the order of tens of meV per atom, a larger-cell calculation (for example a 2x2x1 supercell) for Ta4Fe2Al6 and the nearest competing compositions is needed to check that the preferred Kagome-layer ordering and the relative hull energies are not artifacts of the small cell. Please add such a check, or state explicitly that the 'only stable' conclusion is limited to the 12-atom cell enumeration.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Equation (2), Section 2] Equation (2) and the surrounding text list 'FCC Fe' as the reference state for Fe, whereas Fe is BCC in its ground state; please clarify whether the actual calculation used BCC Fe, as the text later implies.
  2. [Table A1 and Figure 4] The formula notation is inconsistent: Table A1 and Figure 4 use 'Fe6Al2Ta4' and 'Fe2Al6Ta4', while the text uses 'Ta4Fe6Al2' and 'Ta4Fe2Al6'; please use one consistent formula ordering throughout.
  3. [Section 4.3] The text spells 'V on Keitz et al.' where it should read 'von Keitz et al.'; please also check the composition labels in the comparison with Gasper et al. for consistency with the reported experimental compositions.
  4. [Section 4.3] The statement that the about 2.7% difference in the c lattice constant is within the experimental margin of error of von Keitz et al. would be more convincing if a quantitative uncertainty estimate or the original experimental uncertainty were quoted.
  5. [Equation (1), Figure A2] The discussion of free-energy contributions argues that electronic, magnetic, and configurational-entropy terms are negligible, but Figure A2 quantifies only the vibrational contribution; please provide explicit estimates or specific literature values for the other neglected terms.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: DFT hull energies, not fitted inputs, decide the site-occupancy and stability claims; the explicit caveats are correctness or completeness gaps, not circularity.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Site-occupancy preferences in Section 3.1 are read directly from relaxed DFT formation energies in Table A1 with no parameter fitted to the outcomes. The defect phase diagram in Section 4.1 (Eq. 3, Figure 4) uses chemical-potential bounds from the experimental Al-Fe-Ta assessment [27], but these are input constraints rather than fitted values, and the relative dominance of Ta4Fe6Al2 and Ta4Fe2Al6 is decided by the DFT energy intercepts, not constructed from the bounds. The hull stability of Ta4Fe2Al6 in Section 3.3 is a DFT convex-hull result; the agreement with the measured 52 at.% Al solubility limit is an external consistency check, not an input encoded as the answer. Self-citations such as [44], [48], and [13] are methodological or comparative and are not load-bearing; no uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked to forbid alternative site-occupancy or phase choices. The explicit restrictions and omissions flagged in the paper—Al substitution limited to the B sublattice (Section 2) and the incomplete Fe-Al binary set in the Figure A1 caption—are untested assumptions or completeness gaps that bear on correctness, not circularity. In particular, an Al-on-4f antistructure configuration could in principle alter the site-occupancy and hull conclusions, but that possibility is not built into the inputs, so the reported results are not equivalent to the premises by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on standard DFT machinery and on inputs from the experimental phase diagram. No new entities are postulated. The central load-bearing assumptions are the B-sublattice restriction, the 0 K energy proxy, the experimental chemical potential windows, the hull phase list, and the single-cell finite-size approximation.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Al occupies only B sublattice sites (2a, 6h); 4f Ta sites are excluded from the configuration space.
    Section 2: 'Al substitution was permuted among the B-sites... previous studies [22,37,20] suggest that A-site substitution is highly unlikely.' This controls all site occupancy results and is not tested for Ta-Fe-Al.
  • domain assumption DFT formation energies at 0 K, with neglected configurational and magnetic entropy, determine room-temperature site occupancy preferences.
    Section 2 argues vibrational free energy is less than 1% of total free energy below 500 K and electronic, magnetic, and configurational terms are small; this justifies using Etot but remains an approximation.
  • domain assumption The accessible chemical potential range of Al is set by experimental phase boundaries from Witusiewicz et al. [27], not by first-principles phase equilibrium alone.
    Table 1 and Section 2: the Al-rich limit is Ta4Fe2Al6 in equilibrium with TaAl3 and Fe4Al13; the Al-poor limit is Ta32Fe63Al1 in equilibrium with BCC Fe. The defect phase diagram windows depend on these experimental inputs.
  • domain assumption The set of competing phases in the convex hull from [27], with some Fe-Al binaries omitted, is sufficient to determine stability at 0 K.
    Section 3.3 and Figure A1 note that not all binary Fe-Al stable phases are included; the authors argue these omissions do not affect the stability of Ta(Fe1-xAlx)2 phases, but this is not demonstrated with a full hull.
  • domain assumption A 12-atom conventional unit cell with fixed Ta stoichiometry captures the site occupancy physics; solute-solute interactions at dilute limits are represented by the 1 at.% Al cell.
    Section 2 uses only one conventional cell (4 formula units) and represents the Al-poor limit as Ta32Fe63Al1 (1 at.% Al). Finite-size and dilute-limit effects are not quantified with supercell convergence tests.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of First-Principles Insights into the Site Occupancy of Ta-Fe-Al C14 Laves Phases." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/57SPM423

@misc{pith2026241114575,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: First-Principles Insights into the Site Occupancy of Ta-Fe-Al C14 Laves Phases},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/57SPM423}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14575}
}
abstract

This study investigates the site occupancy preferences of Al in Ta(Fe$_{1-x}$Al$_x$)$_2$ Laves phases using first-principles calculations, covering Al concentrations from 0 to 50 at.\%. Al atoms exhibit a strong preference for $2a$ Wyckoff sites, with configurations becoming more energetically favorable as these sites reach full occupancy at high Al concentrations. Magnetic configurations were explored, revealing that anti-ferromagnetic ordering is the most favorable at ground states. A metastable defect phase diagram based on the chemical potential of Al was constructed to map site occupancy preferences, where Ta$_4$Fe$_6$Al$_2$ and Ta$_4$Fe$_2$Al$_6$ exhibit the widest chemical potential windows. The correlation between lattice distortions and site occupancy was examined, demonstrating that symmetric Al distributions enhance structural preference. These findings offer insights into the structural motifs of the Ta-Fe-Al system, providing a foundation for future investigations on structure-property relationships.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.14575 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The conventional unit cell of C14 TaFe2 viewed from (a) an off-axis perspective and (b) along the ⟨c⟩ axis. The structure consists of alternating triple layers and Kagome layers along the ´ ⟨c⟩ direction. The triple layer consists of the 4 f Ta atoms (brown) that sandwich the 2a Fe atoms (light blue). The Kagome Fe layers, shown in two di ´ fferent shades of dark blue, are offset, as the atoms in the upper and lower… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The schematics illustrate (a-c) the possible magnetic configurations in binary TaFe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The Ta-Fe-Al ternary phase diagram at 0 K, showing stable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Metastable defect phase diagram of Ta(Fe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Descriptors of lattice distortion within the C14 Laves phase [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: DFT-calculated (+) and experimentally-measured (♦) [47] a and c lattice constants with increasing Al content in Ta4Fe8−xAlx. 6 displays the a and c lattice constants of the lowest￾energy structures predicted by DFT, compared with Ta(Fe1−xAlx)2 samples synthesized and m…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Livingston, Laves-phase superalloys, Physica Status Solidi A (Applied Research); (Germany) 131 (2) (1992)

    J. Livingston, Laves-phase superalloys, Physica Status Solidi A (Applied Research); (Germany) 131 (2) (1992)

    work page 1992

  2. [2]

    Stein, A

    F. Stein, A. Leineweber, Laves phases: a review of their func- tional and structural applications and an improved fundamental understanding of stability and properties, Journal of Materials Science 56 (9) (2021) 5321–5427

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    L. Xu, Z. Chai, H. Chen, X. Zhang, J. Xie, X. Chen, Tailoring Laves phase and mechanical properties of directed energy de- posited Inconel 718 thin-wall via a gradient laser power method, Materials Science and Engineering: A 824 (2021) 141822

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    S. Sui, Z. Li, C. Zhong, Q. Zhang, A. Gasser, J. Chen, Y . Chew, G. Bi, Laves phase tuning for enhancing high tem- perature mechanical property improvement in laser directed en- ergy deposited Inconel 718, Composites Part B: Engineering 215 (2021) 108819

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    V . A. Yartys, M. V . Lototskyy, Laves type intermetallic com- pounds as hydrogen storage materials: a review, Journal of Al- loys and Compounds 916 (2022) 165219

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Laves, K

    F. Laves, K. L ¨ohberg, Die Kristallstruktur von intermetallis- chen Verbindungen der Formel AB- 2, von... F. Laves und... K. L¨ohberg, Weidmann, 1934

    work page 1934

  7. [7]

    Laves, H

    F. Laves, H. Witte, Die Kristallstruktur des MgNi 2 und seine Beziehungen zu den Typen MgCu 2 und MgZn2, Metallwirtsch 14 (33) (1935) 645–649

    work page 1935

  8. [8]

    Takasugi, M

    T. Takasugi, M. Yoshida, S. Hanada, Deformability improve- ment in C15 NbCr 2 intermetallics by addition of ternary ele- ments, Acta Materialia 44 (2) (1996) 669–674

    work page 1996

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Thoma, F

    D. Thoma, F. Chu, P. Peralta, P. Kotula, K. Chen, T. Mitchell, Elastic and mechanical properties of Nb(Cr, V) 2 C15 Laves phases, Materials Science and Engineering: A 239 (1997) 251– 259

    1997

  2. [10]

    Yoshida, T

    M. Yoshida, T. Takasugi, The alloying e ffect on the high tem- perature deformation of Laves phase NbCr 2 intermetallic com- pound, Materials Science and Engineering: A 234 (1997) 873– 876

    1997

  3. [11]

    K. C. Chen, S. M. Allen, J. D. Livingston, Factors a ffecting the room-temperature mechanical properties of TiCr 2-base Laves phase alloys, Materials Science and Engineering: A 242 (1-2) (1998) 162–173

    1998

  4. [12]

    Takata, H

    N. Takata, H. Ghassemi-Armaki, M. Takeyama, S. Kumar, Nanoindentation study on solid solution softening of Fe-rich Fe2Nb Laves phase by Ni in Fe-Nb-Ni ternary alloys, Inter- metallics 70 (2016) 7–16

    2016

  5. [13]

    Freund, Z

    M. Freund, Z. Xie, P.-L. Sun, L. Berners, J. Spille, H. Wang, C. Thomas, M. Feuerbacher, M. Lipinska-Chwalek, J. Mayer, S. Korte-Kerzel, Influence of chemical composition on the room temperature plasticity of C15 Ca-Al-Mg Laves phases, Acta Materialia 276 (2024) 120124

    2024

  6. [14]

    N. Y . Yurchenko, N. Stepanov, D. Shaysultanov, M. Tikhonovsky, G. Salishchev, E ffect of Al content on structure and mechanical properties of the Al xCrNbTiVZr (x= 0; 0.25; 0.5; 1) high-entropy alloys, Materials Characterization 121 (2016) 125–134

    2016

  7. [15]

    Zubair, S

    M. Zubair, S. Sandl ¨obes, M. Wollenweber, C. Kusche, W. Hilde- brandt, C. Broeckmann, S. Korte-Kerzel, On the role of Laves phases on the mechanical properties of Mg-Al-Ca alloys, Mate- rials Science and Engineering: A 756 (2019) 272–283

    2019

  8. [16]

    Zubair, M

    M. Zubair, M. Felten, B. Hallstedt, M. V . Paredes, L. Ab- dellaoui, R. B. Villoro, M. Lipinska-Chwalek, N. Ayeb, H. Springer, J. Mayer, et al., Laves phases in Mg-Al-Ca alloys and their e ffect on mechanical properties, Materials & Design 225 (2023) 111470

    2023

  9. [17]

    Han, H.-H

    J.-S. Han, H.-H. Lu, Z.-Z. Xing, B. Yang, Y .-N. Wang, L.-Y . Du, M.-N. Yuan, Effects of cooling manner on Laves phase precip- itation and mechanical properties of Al modified super ferritic stainless steels, Journal of Materials Research and Technology 24 (2023) 4258–4270

    2023

  10. [18]

    Tsai, R.-C

    M.-H. Tsai, R.-C. Tsai, T. Chang, W.-F. Huang, Intermetallic phases in high-entropy alloys: statistical analysis of their preva- lence and structural inheritance, Metals 9 (2) (2019) 247

    2019

  11. [19]

    Majzoub, R

    E. Majzoub, R. Hennig, K. Kelton, Rietveld refinement and ab initio calculations of a C14-like Laves phase in Ti-Zr-Ni, Philo- sophical Magazine Letters 83 (1) (2003) 65–71

    2003

  12. [20]

    Kerkau, D

    A. Kerkau, D. Gr ¨uner, A. Ormeci, Y . Prots, H. Borrmann, W. Schnelle, E. Bischoff, Y . Grin, G. Kreiner, Site Occupation Reversal in the C14 Laves Phase Nb(Cr 1−xCox)2, Zeitschrift f¨ur anorganische und allgemeine Chemie 635 (4-5) (2009) 637– 648

    2009

  13. [21]

    X. Yan, A. Grytsiv, P. Rogl, H. Schmidt, G. Giester, A. Saccone, X.-Q. Chen, Laves phases in the ternary systems Ti-Pd, Pt-Al, Intermetallics 17 (5) (2009) 336–342

    2009

  14. [22]

    Yamagata, J

    R. Yamagata, J. Nakamura, T. Itoi, M. Takeyama, K. Yoshimi, Site-occupation and structure relaxation behavior of C14-type stoichiometric and iron-rich Fe 2Nb Laves phases with addi- tion of aluminum or chromium, Materials Characterization 206 (2023) 113447

    2023

  15. [23]

    Grytsiv, X.-Q

    A. Grytsiv, X.-Q. Chen, V . T. Witusiewicz, P. Rogl, R. Pod- loucky, V . Pomjakushin, D. Maccio, A. Saccone, G. Giester, F. Sommer, Atom order and thermodynamic properties of the ternary Laves phase Ti(Ti yNixAl1−X−Y)2, Zeitschrift f ¨ur Kristallographie-Crystalline Materials ...

    2006

  16. [24]

    Yan, X.-Q

    X.-L. Yan, X.-Q. Chen, A. Grytsiv, P. Rogl, R. Podloucky, H. Schmidt, G. Giester, X.-Y . Ding, On the ternary Laves phases Ti(Mn1−xAlx)2 with MgZn2-type, Intermetallics 16 (1) (2008) 16–26

    2008

  17. [25]

    Yan, X.-Q

    X. Yan, X.-Q. Chen, A. Grytsiv, V . T. Witusiewicz, P. Rogl, R. Podloucky, V . Pomjakushin, G. Giester, Site preference, ther- modynamic, and magnetic properties of the ternary Laves phase Ti(Fe1−xAlx)2 with the crystal structure of the MgZn 2-type, In- ternational Journal of ...

    2022

  18. [26]

    R. H. Jones, V . Zackay, E. Parker, Laves phase precipitation in Fe-Ta alloys, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B 3 (1972) 2835–2842

    1972

  19. [27]

    Witusiewicz, A

    V . Witusiewicz, A. Bondar, U. Hecht, V . V oblikov, N. Tsy- ganenko, O. Fomichov, M. Karpets, V . Petyukh, T. Y . Ve- likanova, Experimental study and thermodynamic modelling of the ternary Al-Fe-Ta system, Journal of Materials Science 48 (2013) 377–412

    2013

  20. [28]

    V . Raghavan, Phase diagram updates and evaluations of the Al-Fe-Ta, Al-Ge-Ni, Al-Li-Zn, Al-Sc-Si and Al-Ta-Ti systems, Journal of Phase Equilibria and Di ffusion 34 (4) (2013) 328– 349

    2013

  21. [29]

    Kresse, J

    G. Kresse, J. Furthm ¨uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab ini- tio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys- ical Review B 54 (16) (1996) 11169

    1996

  22. [30]

    Kresse, J

    G. Kresse, J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Physical Review B 47 (1) (1993) 558

    1993

  23. [31]

    Kresse, D

    G. Kresse, D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Physical Review b 59 (3) (1999) 1758

    1999

  24. [32]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Physical Review Letters 77 (18) (1996) 3865

    1996

  25. [33]

    Methfessel, A

    M. Methfessel, A. Paxton, High-precision sampling for Brillouin-zone integration in metals, Physical Review B 40 (6) (1989) 3616. 14

    1989

  26. [34]

    H. J. Monkhorst, J. D. Pack, Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations, Physical Review B 13 (12) (1976) 5188

    1976

  27. [35]

    Momma, F

    K. Momma, F. Izumi, VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visual- ization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, Journal of Applied Crystallography 44 (6) (2011) 1272–1276

    2011

  28. [36]

    A. Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO - the Open Visualization Tool, Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering 18 (1) (2009) 015012

    2009

  29. [37]

    Prymak, F

    O. Prymak, F. Stein, A. Kerkau, A. Ormeci, G. M. Kreiner, G. Frommeyer, D. Raabe, Phase equilibria in the ternary Nb- Cr-Al system and site occupation in the hexagonal C14 Laves phase Nb(AlxCr1−x)2, MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) 1128 (2008) 1128–U08

    2008

  30. [38]

    D. Vasilyev, Comparison of thermal expansion path of the Fe2Mo Laves phase calculated using the DFT-based phonon and Debye-Gr ¨uneisen approaches, Materials Today Communi- cations 35 (2023) 105550

    2023

  31. [39]

    Vasilyev, A new method for calculating the thermodynamic and physical properties of compounds: Application to laves phase fe2mo, Physica B: Condensed Matter 621 (2021) 413307

    D. Vasilyev, A new method for calculating the thermodynamic and physical properties of compounds: Application to laves phase fe2mo, Physica B: Condensed Matter 621 (2021) 413307

    2021

  32. [40]

    Mayer, H

    B. Mayer, H. Anton, E. Bott, M. Methfessel, J. Sticht, J. Har- ris, P. Schmidt, Ab-initio calculation of the elastic constants and thermal expansion coe fficients of laves phases, Intermetallics 11 (1) (2003) 23–32

    2003

  33. [41]

    Samanta, A

    B. Samanta, A. Jain, Experimental investigation of lattice ther- mal expansion and specific heat capacity of C15-Cr 2Zr laves phase intermetallic compound by htxrd and dsc, Intermetallics 148 (2022) 107634

    2022

  34. [42]

    S. P. Ong, L. Wang, B. Kang, G. Ceder, Li-fe-p-o 2 phase dia- gram from first principles calculations, Chemistry of Materials 20 (5) (2008) 1798–1807

    2008

  35. [43]

    S. P. Ong, A. Jain, G. Hautier, B. Kang, G. Ceder, Thermal sta- bilities of delithiated olivine mpo4 (m= fe, mn) cathodes investi- gated using first principles calculations, Electrochemistry Com- munications 12 (3) (2010) 427–430

    2010

  36. [44]

    Korte-Kerzel, T

    S. Korte-Kerzel, T. Hickel, L. Huber, D. Raabe, S. Sandl ¨obes- Haut, M. Todorova, J. Neugebauer, Defect phases– thermodynamics and impact on material properties, Inter- national Materials Reviews 67 (1) (2022) 89–117

    2022

  37. [45]

    Tehranchi, S

    A. Tehranchi, S. Zhang, A. Zendegani, C. Scheu, T. Hickel, J. Neugebauer, Metastable defect phase diagrams as roadmap to tailor chemically driven defect formation, Acta Materialia 277 (2024) 120145

    2024

  38. [46]

    R. L. Johnston, R. Ho ffmann, Structure-Bonding Relationships in the Laves Phases, Zeitschrift f¨ur anorganische und allgemeine Chemie 616 (10) (1992) 105–120

    1992

  39. [47]

    A. V . Keitz, G. Sautho ff, P. Neumann, Laves phases for high temperatures - structure, stability and constitution, International Journal of Materials Research 89 (12) (2021) 803–810

    2021

  40. [48]

    Gasper, E

    C. Gasper, E. M. Soysal, N. Ulumuddin, T. Stollenwerk, T. Re- clik, P.-L. Sun, S. Korte-Kerzel, Mechanical properties and de- formation mechanisms of the C14 Laves and µ-phase in the ternary Ta-Fe(-Al) system, Materials & Design (2025) 113625

    2025

  41. [49]

    K. Kai, T. Nakamichi, M. Yamamoto, Magnetic Behavior of the Laves Phase Compound in Fe-Ta Binary System, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 29 (4) (1970) 1094–1095

    1970

  42. [50]

    Horie, S.-i

    Y . Horie, S.-i. Kawashima, Y . Yamada, G. Obara, T. Nakamura, Magnetic properties of Ta(Fe 1−xTx)2 with T= V, Cr, Mn, Co and Ni, in: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, V ol. 200, IOP Publishing, 2010, p. 032078

    2010

  43. [51]

    Yamada, A

    Y . Yamada, A. Sakata, T. Murakami, Magnetic properties of Ta (Fe1−xAlx)2, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 140 (1995) 69–70

    1995

  44. [52]

    Pauling, Atomic radii and interatomic distances in metals, Journal of the American Chemical Society 69 (3) (1947) 542– 553

    L. Pauling, Atomic radii and interatomic distances in metals, Journal of the American Chemical Society 69 (3) (1947) 542– 553

    1947

  45. [53]

    Yamada, K

    Y . Yamada, K. Kuroda, K.-i. Matono, A. Sakata, Magnetisation and nmr studies of magnetic properties of ti(fe 1-xalx) 2, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 69 (1) (2000) 225–229.arXiv: https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.69.225, doi:10.1143/ JPSJ.69.225. URL https://doi.org/10....

    2000 doi

  46. [54]

    Yamada, A

    Y . Yamada, A. Sakata, T. Murakami, NMR Study of Magnetic Properties of Nb(Fe1−xAlx)2, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 62 (5) (1993) 1710–1715

    1993

  47. [55]

    A. Togo, L. Chaput, T. Tadano, I. Tanaka, Implementation strategies in phonopy and phono3py, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter 35 (35) (2023) 353001. 15

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.