Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 60 references

Transient rheology and morphology in sheared nanolayer polymer films

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Layer thickness controls the fate of sheared PS/PMMA multilayer films: micron layers stay intact, submicron layers break into droplets, and the complex viscosity drops then recovers as the morphology goes from lamellar-like to nodular.

desk verdict A solid, honest experimental study of nanolayer film breakup under shear, with a genuine quench-validation gap that a good referee should push on but that does not sink the core result. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14591 v1 pith:OY4T5WKI submitted 2024-11-21 cond-mat.soft

Anna Dmochowska , Jorge Peixinho , Cyrille Sollogoub , Guillaume Miquelard-Garnier This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.soft
keywords polymermultilayerfilmsnanolayercoextrusiondewettinglayerbreakuposcillatoryshearrheologyPS/PMMAblendscomplexviscosityLAOS
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is trying to establish that, in coextruded PS/PMMA multilayer films under oscillatory shear, the thickness of the individual layers controls both the transient rheology and the morphological fate of the film. Micron-thick layers (around 1 µm) stay continuous over an hour and keep a constant complex viscosity $\eta^*$, while submicron layers (roughly 100–400 nm) dewet, break up, retract and coalesce into a lamellar-like blend with micron-sized droplets. On the rheological signal this appears as three time zones: an early viscosity drop near 2 min, a plateau or partial recovery until 10 min, and a slow rise to a second plateau near 20 min as the organized multilayer structure is lost. This matters because it turns a bulk viscosity measurement into a non-destructive probe of nanoscale layer breakup, and because it shows that large oscillatory strain selects a lamellar-like morphology over a nodular one within the measured time window. The viscosity time series thereby becomes a candidate macroscopic fingerprint for when thousands of nanometric layers stop being layers.

What carries the argument

The central object is the individual layer thickness $e$, acting through the classical thin-film result that rupture time scales as $\eta e^5$, which makes micron layers stable for hours but nanolayers rupture in seconds to minutes. The rheological machinery is the complex viscosity $\eta^*$ of the multilayer stack compared with the simple additivity rule $1/\eta^* = \varphi_{PS}/\eta^*_{PS} + \varphi_{PMMA}/\eta^*_{PMMA}$; the return of the measured $\eta^*$ to the additivity-rule plateau is taken as the bulk signature that the organized layered structure has been replaced by a blend-like morphology. The morphological machinery is the dewetting sequence—hole nucleation and growth, rim formation and retraction, coalescence of lamellae, and capillary breakup of the retracted threads into droplets—which the paper reads off quenched cross-sections and correlates with the three time zones of the viscosity signal.

What would settle it

Repeat the 2049-layer experiments with simultaneous in-situ imaging or fast X-ray microtomography during oscillatory shear, so that no quenching step is needed. If nodular domains are seen before the viscosity minimum, or if the viscosity minimum occurs while all layers remain continuous, the proposed ordering—dewetting drives the viscosity drop—would be falsified; conversely, visible breakups with a flat $\eta^*$ would falsify the rheology–morphology correlation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that individual layer thickness—not the number of layers or the total film thickness—controls both the transient rheology and the morphology of sheared PS/PMMA multilayers. Films with ~1 µm layers keep $\eta^*$ nearly constant and well described by a simple additivity rule, and microscopy shows continuous layers after 30 min; films with ~100–400 nm layers show an early minimum in $\eta^*$, a partial recovery, and a second plateau, while the cross-sections first show broken layer ends with growing rims, then shorter and thicker lamellae, coalescence, and finally near-circular droplets. The paper attributes the second plateau to a blend-like morphology close to its final state, and uses droplet area distributions to show that under low strain the nodular morphology is reached faster when the initial PS layers are thinnest (30/70 composition), whereas increasing strain at fixed frequency reduces the droplet fraction—large-amplitude oscillations stabilize the lamellar-like morphology within the measured time window.

Load-bearing premise

The entire morphological timeline rests on the assumption that rapidly cooling a sample with an air gun and taking it out of the rheometer preserves the exact layer and droplet structure that existed during oscillation; if quenching or handling changes that structure, the claimed breakup sequence and its correlation with the viscosity signal would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, the safe processing window for coextruded films should be judged by individual layer thickness: films with ~1 µm layers can survive an hour of oscillatory shear at 180 °C, whereas ~100–400 nm layers cannot.
  • The viscosity signal provides two practical markers: the minimum near 2 min flags the early stage of layer destabilization, and the second plateau near 20 min flags the loss of the organized multilayer structure.
  • Droplet size statistics after 30 min show a dominant PS droplet area around 10–15 µm² across nearly all tested frequencies, so the final droplet size is not strongly frequency-controlled in the linear regime.
  • Strain amplitude is a morphology switch: at 1 rad/s, increasing the strain from 0.1% to 100% lowers the fraction of circular PS droplets from 8% to 3%, meaning large-amplitude oscillations favor lamellar-like domains over droplets in the measured window.
  • For the 30/70 composition, raising the pulsation from 0.1 to 100 rad/s increases the droplet fraction from 16% to 38%, so thinner minority layers break into droplets faster at higher frequencies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The early viscosity minimum occurs before many breakups are visible, so the minimum may partly reflect pre-rupture thickness fluctuations or alignment rather than rupture itself; simultaneous in-situ imaging would separate these contributions.
  • If the second plateau reliably marks complete dewetting, the same oscillatory protocol could be adapted as an online quality-control test for coextruded films, flagging batches whose layers are thin enough to break during processing.
  • The composition dependence points toward a criterion based on the thickness ratio of adjacent layers, not just the absolute thickness, for predicting which phase breaks first; systematically varying the 30/70 versus 60/40 initial ratios would test it.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper investigates the time-dependent complex viscosity of coextruded PS/PMMA multilayer films under small- and large-amplitude oscillatory shear at 180 °C. For films with 129 layers (individual layer thicknesses of order 1 µm), the complex viscosity remains constant over time and the layers remain continuous. For films with 2049 layers (submicron layer thicknesses), the complex viscosity initially decreases, reaches a minimum at about 2 minutes, partially recovers, and then approaches a plateau. Post-quench cross-section microscopy (optical and AFM) shows that the nanolayered samples undergo layer breakup, retraction, coalescence, and the formation of lamellar-like and later nodular morphologies, with the nodular morphology appearing earlier for thinner initial layers and suppressed at high strain amplitudes. The paper proposes that rheology can serve as a non-direct macroscopic probe of dewetting in multilayer films.

Significance. If the correlation is valid, the work provides a practical, non-invasive route to monitor nanoscale layer breakup in multilayer polymer films, relevant to coextrusion processing. The study is strengthened by the control experiment on micron-thick layers, by the use of a separate additivity rule (Eq. 2) computed from independently measured neat polymer viscosities as a benchmark, and by the systematic variation of frequency and strain amplitude. The prediction that large strains stabilize lamellar-like morphologies is falsifiable and of practical interest. The main limitations are the reliance on post-mortem quenched samples for morphology and the lack of a quantitative temporal match between the viscosity minimum and the first observable breakups.

major comments (2)
  1. [Materials and Methods, Rheology] The assumption that air-gun quenching preserves the in-situ morphology is load-bearing for the rheology–morphology correlation. The manuscript states that samples were 'quickly cooled down or temperature quenched using an air gun', but it provides no cooling-rate measurement, no quench-fidelity control, and no in-situ comparison. During cooling from 180 °C to below Tg, the submicron layers (ePS ≈ 287 nm, ePMMA ≈ 221 nm) pass through a low-viscosity window in which capillary retraction and residual-stress-driven flow can alter layer continuity and droplet statistics. The inferred sequence (breakup → retraction → coalescence → lamellar-like → nodular) and the strain-dependent droplet percentages in Table 1 could therefore be artifacts of the quench protocol. Please provide a control experiment (e.g., varying the quench rate or comparing with in-situ observation) or explicitly restrict the morphological claims to the post-quench state.
  2. [Results and discussion, Effect of ω on SAOS, Figs. 3 and 5] The viscosity minimum at t ≈ 2 min precedes the first microscopy observation at t = 3 min, where the layers are reported unbroken (Fig. 5). The paper acknowledges in the text that this drop 'cannot be correlated quantitatively to an onset of dewetting' but still claims a 'clear' link to early dewetting. Because the minimum occurs before any observed breakup, the causal connection between the transient rheology and the initiation of layer breakup is not established. To support the central claim that rheology tracks the onset of dewetting, the authors should either obtain morphological data at t ≈ 2 min (e.g., by quenching at that time) or temper the claim to state that the viscosity drop precedes and is consistent with, but not directly observed to coincide with, the onset of breakup.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'while the nanolayers dewet' is an incomplete sentence; revise to a full clause.
  2. [Results and discussion, Fig. 4 and Fig. 9] Scale bars are missing from the captions of Figs. 4 and 9; provide scale bar lengths for all images so that the reported feature sizes and droplet areas can be evaluated.
  3. [Results and discussion, Image analysis paragraph] The thresholds of 5 µm² for the minimum area and c > 0.5 for circularity are justified only qualitatively; a sensitivity analysis of the droplet percentages in Table 1 to these thresholds would strengthen the quantitative claims.
  4. [Results and discussion, LAOS section] The statement that the multilayer film behavior 'seems unaffected by this non-linearity' for γ = 10% (Fig. 8a,b) is contradicted by the described three time zones; rephrase for clarity.
  5. [Conclusions] The sentence beginning 'As a validation of the previous hypotheses, for thick multilayer films after, the shear SAOS complex viscosity remains constant' contains a stray comma after 'after'; remove it.
  6. [Throughout] Use a single consistent notation for the complex viscosity (η* or η∗) throughout the text, equations, and figure captions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular reduction: the rheology–morphology connection is an experimental correlation, and the additivity benchmark is computed from independent neat-polymer measurements.

full rationale

This is an experimental study with no fitted parameter that is subsequently renamed as a prediction. The central comparison is between measured complex viscosity transients and post-mortem cross-sectional morphologies; both are independent observations, and the paper explicitly states that the short-time viscosity drop 'cannot be correlated quantitatively to an onset of dewetting', which acknowledges rather than conceals the interpretive gap. The additivity rule (Eq. 2) is computed from separately measured PS and PMMA viscosities and volume fractions, and the paper notes agreement within about 15%; it is a benchmark, not a fit to the transient data. The Cox-Merz assumption is an external modeling assumption, not a circular reduction. Self-citations to Dmochowska et al. (2022, 2023) supply material parameters, prior dewetting-speed results, and interphase analysis; these are independent experimental inputs, not restatements of the paper's own claims, and none of them is used to forbid alternative explanations through an imported uniqueness theorem. The quench-fidelity concern raised by the methods description is a validity assumption about how well post-quench samples represent in-situ states, but an unvalidated assumption is not the same as a derivation that reduces to its inputs. No equation is defined in terms of the result it is used to explain, and no morphology state is imposed by the rheological model. Accordingly, no specific circular step can be exhibited, and the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

None of the analysis steps require a newly introduced physical entity or a fitted model parameter. The interpretation leans on established scaling laws and on prior characterization of the same PS and PMMA grades. The image-analysis thresholds (5 µm², circularity > 0.5) are hand-set cutoffs rather than fitted physical constants.

free parameters (2)
  • minimum droplet area for particle analysis = 5 µm²
    Areas smaller than 5 µm² are excluded from ImageJ analysis; this cutoff shapes the reported droplet size distributions and percentages.
  • circularity threshold for droplet-like shapes = 0.5
    Only PS domains with circularity c = 4πA/P² > 0.5 are counted as droplets in Table 1 and Fig. 7.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption PS/PMMA interface properties from prior literature (interfacial tension, Hamaker constant, contact angle) apply to the coextruded films.
    Used to estimate ec ≈ 70 µm and spinodal thickness ≈ 10 nm in the 'Effect of ω on SAOS' section.
  • domain assumption Cox-Merz rule holds for nanolayered PS/PMMA films.
    Invoked in 'Effect of ω on SAOS' to interpret η*(ω) as shear-thinning behavior.
  • domain assumption Neat PS and PMMA rheology from Dmochowska et al. (2023) is representative of the current films at 180 °C.
    Used as baseline in the additivity rule (Eq. 2) and in Figs. 2, 3, and 8.
  • domain assumption No significant thermal degradation or material loss occurs during 30 minutes at 180 °C under air.
    The rheometer runs under air flow to mimic processing; degradation is not measured or discussed.
  • standard math Vrij's rupture-time scaling t ~ η e^5 and the spinodal length scale sqrt(AH/3πγ) apply to polymer layers embedded in an immiscible melt.
    Used to argue that 1 µm layers are stable for days while 100 nm layers rupture in tens of seconds.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Transient rheology and morphology in sheared nanolayer polymer films." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OY4T5WKI

@misc{pith2026241114591,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Transient rheology and morphology in sheared nanolayer polymer films},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OY4T5WKI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14591}
}
read the original abstract

The rheology of coextruded layered films of polystyrene/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PS/PMMA) has been studied with small and large amplitude oscillations at a temperature above their glass transition. While the complex viscosity remains constant over the experimental time window for the micron-sized layered films, a decrease has been observed for the nanolayered films. The rheological behavior has then been correlated to the morphological evolution of the multilayer films: while the nanolayers dewet. Layer breakup followed by retraction and coalescence leading to a lamellar-like blend morphology succeeded by a nodular-like morphology has been evidenced in the nanolayer films, for all compositions and conditions tested. The analysis of the microscopic images of the film cross-sections also provided the droplet size distribution. The nodular morphology is achieved more rapidly when the initial layers are the thinnest at low strains, while at high strains the formation of these droplets is prevented.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline " cite write " FUNCTION editor.postfix editor num.names #1 > "( )" "( )" if FUNCTION editor.trans.postfix editor num.names #1 > "( )" "( )" if FUNCTION trans.postfix translator num.names #1 > "( )" "( )" if FUNCTION authors.editors.reflist.apa5 'field := 'dot := field num.names 'numnames := numnames 'format.num.names := format.num.names na...

  2. [2]

    Available from:

    ENTRY address assignee author booktitle chapter cartographer day edition editor howpublished institution inventor journal key keywords month note number organization pages part publisher school series title type volume word year eprint doi url lastchecked updated archive archivePrefix primaryClass eid adsurl adsnote version label INTEGERS output.state bef...

  3. [3]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize ":" * " " *...

  4. [4]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION string.to.integer 't := t text.length 'k := #1 'char.num := t char.num #1 substring 's := s is.num s "." = or char.num k = not and char.num #1 + 'char.num := while char.num #1 - 'char.num := t #1 char.num substring FUNCTION find.integer 't := #0 'int := int not t empty not and t #1 #1 substring 's :=...

  5. [5]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION output.doi doi empty skip "doi:" doi * "" * output if FUNCTION format.archive archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix ":" * if FUNCTION format.primaryClass primaryClass empty "" " [" primaryClass * "] " * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archive empty " https://arxiv.org/abs/" eprint * " " * " ...

  6. [6]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION string.to.integer 't := t text.length 'k := #1 'char.num := t char.num #1 substring 's := s is.num s "." = or char.num k = not and char.num #1 + 'char.num := while char.num #1 - 'char.num := t #1 char.num substring FUNCTION find.integer 't := #0 'int := int not t empty not and t #1 #1 substring 's :=...

  7. [7]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eid howpublished institution journal key keywords month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url volume year eprint archive archivePrefix primaryClass adsurl adsnote version label INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.sta...

  8. [8]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION if.digit duplicate "0" = swap duplicate "1" = swap duplicate "2" = swap duplicate "3" = swap duplicate "4" = swap duplicate "5" = swap duplicate "6" = swap duplicate "7" = swap duplicate "8" = swap "9" = or or or or or or or or or FUNCTION n.separate 't := "" #0 'numnames := t empty not t #-1 #1 subs...

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archive author booktitle chapter edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key keywords month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url doi volume year archivePrefix primaryClass eid adsurl adsnote version label INTEGERS o...

  2. [10]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

  3. [11]

    MK, Hasanpour M (2020) Evolution of morphology and morphology stability in pp/pa6/epdm-g-ma reactive ternary blends using viscoelastic measurements

    Afsari B, Razavi A. MK, Hasanpour M (2020) Evolution of morphology and morphology stability in pp/pa6/epdm-g-ma reactive ternary blends using viscoelastic measurements. Rheol Acta 59:399--414. doi:10.1007/s00397-020-01211-x

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    Macromolecules 50(6):2239--2256

    Baer E, Zhu L (2017) 50 ^ th anniversary perspective: Di electric phenomena in polymers and multilayered dielectric films. Macromolecules 50(6):2239--2256. doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.6b02669

    2017 doi

  5. [13]

    Macromolecules 50(3):1027--1036

    Beena Unni A, Vignaud G, Chapel JP, et al (2017) Probing the density variation of confined polymer thin films via simple model-independent nanoparticle adsorption. Macromolecules 50(3):1027--1036. doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.6b02617

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    ACS Macro Lett 8(10):1309--1315

    Beuguel Q, Guinault A, Léger L, et al (2019) Nanorheology with a conventional rheometer: Probing the interfacial properties in compatibilized multinanolayer polymer films. ACS Macro Lett 8(10):1309--1315. doi:10.1021/acsmacrolett.9b00662

    2019 doi

  7. [15]

    J Rheol 64(4):981--989

    Beuguel Q, Guinault A, Chinesta F, et al (2020) Modeling of the rheological properties of multinanolayer films in the presence of compatibilized interphase. J Rheol 64(4):981--989. doi:10.1122/1.5143899

    2020 doi

  8. [16]

    PhD thesis, Ecole Nationale Sup \'e rieure d'Arts et M \'e tiers

    Bironeau A (2016) Films multinanocouches de polym \`e res amorphes coextrud \'e s : \'e laboration, caract \'e risation et stabilit \'e des nanocouches . PhD thesis, Ecole Nationale Sup \'e rieure d'Arts et M \'e tiers

    2016

  9. [17]

    J Microsc 264(1):48--58

    Bironeau A, Dirrenberger J, Sollogoub C, et al (2016) Evaluation of morphological representative sample sizes for nanolayered polymer blends. J Microsc 264(1):48--58. doi:10.1111/jmi.12415

    2016 doi

  10. [18]

    Macromolecules 50(10):4064--4073

    Bironeau A, Salez T, Miquelard-Garnier G, et al (2017) Existence of a critical layer thickness in PS / PMMA nanolayered films. Macromolecules 50(10):4064--4073. doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.7b00176

    2017 doi

  11. [19]

    Langmuir 9(183):3682--3690

    Brochard Wyart F, Martin P, Redon C (1993) Liquid/liquid dewetting. Langmuir 9(183):3682--3690. doi:10.1021/la00036a053

    1993 doi

  12. [20]

    Polymer 46(8):2610--2620

    Calv \ a o PS, Yee M, Demarquette NR (2005) Effect of composition on the linear viscoelastic behavior and morphology of PMMA / PS and PMMA / PP blends. Polymer 46(8):2610--2620. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2005.02.010

    2005 doi

  13. [21]

    Polymer 193:122334

    Charfeddine I, Majest \'e JC, Carrot C, et al (2020) A model for the prediction of the morphology of immiscible blends of polymers. Polymer 193:122334. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2020.122334

    2020

  14. [22]

    Soft Matter 14:6256--6263

    Chebil MS, McGraw JD, Salez T, et al (2018) Influence of outer-layer finite-size effects on the rupture kinetics of a thin polymer film embedded in an immiscible matrix. Soft Matter 14:6256--6263. doi:10.1039/c8sm00592c

    2018 doi

  15. [23]

    Rev Mod Phys 81(3):1131--1198

    Craster RV, Matar OK (2009) Dynamics and stability of thin liquid films . Rev Mod Phys 81(3):1131--1198. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1131

    2009 doi

  16. [24]

    J Fluid Mech 661:522--539

    Davis MJ, Gratton MB, Davis SH (2010) Suppressing van der W aals driven rupture through shear. J Fluid Mech 661:522--539. doi:10.1017/S002211201000323X

    2010 doi

  17. [25]

    Phys Rev Fluids 9(2):024201

    Dhaliwal V, Pedersen C, Kadri K, et al (2024) Instability and rupture of sheared viscous liquid nanofilms. Phys Rev Fluids 9(2):024201. doi:10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.024201

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    ACS Macro Lett 11:422--427

    Dmochowska A, Peixinho J, Sollogoub C, et al (2022) Dewetting dynamics of sheared thin polymer films: An experimental study. ACS Macro Lett 11:422--427. doi:10.1021/acsmacrolett.2c00070

    2022 doi

  19. [27]

    Macromolecules 56(16):6222--6231

    Dmochowska A, Peixinho J, Sollogoub C, et al (2023) Extensional viscosity of immiscible polymer multi-nanolayer films: Signature of the interphase. Macromolecules 56(16):6222--6231. doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.3c00288

    2023 doi

  20. [28]

    PhD thesis, Mechanical Engineering, doi:10.6100/IR555718

    Dooley J (2002) Viscoelastic flow effects in multilayer polymer coextrusion. PhD thesis, Mechanical Engineering, doi:10.6100/IR555718

    2002 doi

  21. [29]

    Polymer 143:19--27

    Feng J, Zhang Z, Bironeau A, et al (2018) Breakup behavior of nanolayers in polymeric multilayer systems- C reation of nanosheets and nanodroplets. Polymer 143:19--27. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2018.03.049

    2018 doi

  22. [30]

    Springer, New York, NY, doi:doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21656-0

    Gennes PG, Brochard-Wyart F, Qu \'e r \'e D (2004) Capillarity and wetting phenomena. Springer, New York, NY, doi:doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21656-0

    2004 doi

  23. [31]

    Rheol Acta 40:560--569

    Grmela M, Bousmina M, Palierne JF (2001) On the rheology of immiscible blends. Rheol Acta 40:560--569. doi:10.1007/s003970100188

    2001 doi

  24. [32]

    C R Phys 7(9-10):1073--1081

    Herminghaus S, Brochard F (2006) Dewetting through nucleation. C R Phys 7(9-10):1073--1081. doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2006.10.021

    2006 doi

  25. [33]

    Rheol Acta 46:507--520

    Huo Y, Groeninckx G, Moldenaers P (2007) Rheology and morphology of polystyrene/polypropylene blends with in situ compatibilization. Rheol Acta 46:507--520. doi:10.1007/s00397-006-0158-3

    2007 doi

  26. [34]

    J Rheol 63(5):751--761

    Jordan AM, Lee B, Kim K, et al (2019) Rheology of polymer multilayers: Slip in shear, hardening in extension. J Rheol 63(5):751--761. doi:10.1122/1.5109788

    2019 doi

  27. [35]

    Polymer 235:124283

    Kadri K, Peixinho J, Salez T, et al (2021) Dewetting of a thin polymer film under shear. Polymer 235:124283. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2021.124283

    2021

  28. [36]

    J Phys: Condens Matter 9:7741--7752

    Krausch G (1997) Dewetting at the interface between two immiscible polymers. J Phys: Condens Matter 9:7741--7752. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/9/37/007

    1997 doi

  29. [37]

    Plastic Design Library, Elsevier Inc., Amsterdam, doi:10.1016/C2014-0-02177-6

    Langhe D, Ponting M (2016) Manufacturing and novel applications of multilayer polymer films. Plastic Design Library, Elsevier Inc., Amsterdam, doi:10.1016/C2014-0-02177-6

    2016 doi

  30. [38]

    J Rheol 38(5):1405--1425

    Lee HM, Park OO (1994) Rheology and dynamics of immiscible polymer blends. J Rheol 38(5):1405--1425. doi:10.1122/1.550551

    1994 doi

  31. [39]

    J Rheol 53(4):893--915

    Lee PC, Park HE, Morse DC, et al (2009) Polymer-polymer interfacial slip in multilayered films. J Rheol 53(4):893--915. doi:10.1122/1.3114370

    2009 doi

  32. [40]

    Rheol Acta 63:361--377

    Li J, Touil I, Lu B, et al (2024) Interfacial shear and elongational rheology of immiscible multi-micro-nanolayered polymers: contribution for probing the effect of highly mismatched viscoelastic properties and modeling interfacial tension properties. Rheol Acta 63:361--377. d...

    2024 doi

  33. [41]

    Macromolecules 38(26):10721--10727

    Liu RYF, Ranade AP, Wang HP, et al (2005) Forced assembly of polymer nanolayers thinner than the interphase. Macromolecules 38(26):10721--10727. doi:10.1021/ma051649x

    2005 doi

  34. [42]

    Macromol Symp 149(1):171--184

    Macosko CW (2000) Morphology development and control in immiscible polymer blends. Macromol Symp 149(1):171--184. doi:10.1002/1521-3900(200001)149:1<171::AID-MASY171>3.0.CO;2-8

    2000 doi

  35. [43]

    J Rheol 44(3):569--583

    Martin P, Carreau PJ, Favis BD, et al (2000) Investigating the morphology/rheology interrelationships in immiscible polymer blends. J Rheol 44(3):569--583. doi:10.1122/1.551101

    2000 doi

  36. [44]

    Polymer 149:124--133

    Montana JS, Roland S, Richaud E, et al (2018) Nanostructuration effect on the mechanical properties of PMMA toughened by a triblock acrylate copolymer using multilayer coextrusion. Polymer 149:124--133. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2018.06.048

    2018 doi

  37. [45]

    Rheol Acta 29:204--214

    Palierne JF (1990) Linear rheology of viscoelastic emulsions with interfacial tension. Rheol Acta 29:204--214. doi:10.1007/BF01331356

    1990 doi

  38. [46]

    Phys Fluids 7(7):1529--1544

    Papageorgiou DT (1995) On the breakup of viscous liquid threads. Phys Fluids 7(7):1529--1544. doi:10.1063/1.868540

    1995 doi

  39. [47]

    Nat Mater 4:754--758

    Reiter G, Hamieh M, Damman P, et al (2005) Residual stresses in thin polymer films cause rupture and dominate early stages of dewetting. Nat Mater 4:754--758. doi:10.1038/nmat1484

    2005 doi

  40. [48]

    EPL 76(2):236

    Reyssat E, Qu \'e r \'e D (2006) Bursting of a fluid film in a viscous environment. EPL 76(2):236. doi:10.1209/epl/i2006-10262-x

    2006 doi

  41. [49]

    Nat Methods 9(7):671--675

    Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH I mage to I mage J : 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9(7):671--675. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2089

    2012 doi

  42. [50]

    J Colloid Interface Sci 178(2):383--399

    Sharma A, Reiter G (1996) Instability of thin polymer films on coated substrates: rupture, dewetting, and drop formation. J Colloid Interface Sci 178(2):383--399. doi:10.1006/jcis.1996.0133

    1996

  43. [51]

    J Colloid Interface Sci 40(3):448--467

    Van Oene H (1972) Modes of dispersion of viscoelastic fluids in flow. J Colloid Interface Sci 40(3):448--467. doi:10.1016/0021-9797(72)90355-4

    1972 doi

  44. [52]

    In: Polymer blends

    Van Oene H (1978) Rheology of polymer blends and dispersions. In: Polymer blends. Elsevier, p 295--352, doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-546801-5.50013-X

    1978 doi

  45. [53]

    Discuss Faraday Soc 42:23--33

    Vrij A (1966) Possible mechanism for the spontaneous rupture of thin free liquid films. Discuss Faraday Soc 42:23--33. doi:10.1039/DF9664200023

    1966 doi

  46. [54]

    Science 323(5915):757--760

    Wang H, Keum JK, Hiltner A, et al (2009) Confined crystallization of polyethylene oxide in nanolayer assemblies. Science 323(5915):757--760. doi:10.1126/science.1164601

    2009 doi

  47. [55]

    Polymer Bulletin 40(2):235--241

    Weis C, Leukel J, Borkenstein K, et al (1998) Morphological and rheological detection of the phase inversion of PMMA / PS polymer blends. Polymer Bulletin 40(2):235--241. doi:10.1007/s002890050247

    1998 doi

  48. [56]

    Rheol Acta 46(5):653--664

    Yee M, Calv \ a o PS, Demarquette NR (2007) Rheological behavior of poly (methyl methacrylate)/polystyrene ( PMMA / PS ) blends with the addition of PMMA - ran - PS . Rheol Acta 46(5):653--664. doi:10.1007/s00397-006-0154-7

    2007 doi

  49. [57]

    J Rheol 46(1):145--167

    Zhao R, Macosko CW (2002) Slip at polymer–polymer interfaces: Rheological measurements on coextruded multilayers. J Rheol 46(1):145--167. doi:10.1122/1.1427912

    2002 doi

  50. [58]

    Polymer 90:156--164

    Zhu Y, Bironeau A, Restagno F, et al (2016) Kinetics of thin polymer film rupture: Model experiments for a better understanding of layer breakups in the multilayer coextrusion process. Polymer 90:156--164. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2016.03.005

    2016 doi

  51. [59]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archive author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution journal key keywords month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url volume year archivePrefix primaryClass adsurl adsnote version label extra.labe...

  52. [60]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION add.period duplicate empty 'skip "." * add.blank if FUNCTION if.digit duplicate "0" = swap duplicate "1" = swap duplicate "2" = swap duplicate "3" = swap duplicate "4" = swap duplicate "5" = swap duplicate "6" = swap dupl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.