Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 47 references

Manipulating Momentum-Space and Real-Space Topological States in Metallic Strontium Ruthenate Ultrathin Films

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Hump-like Hall features in ultrathin SrRuO3/SrIrO3 are intrinsic skyrmion signals because the anomalous Hall sign stays negative, excluding two-channel superposition.

desk verdict Real new ultrathin SrRuO3 data, but the central skyrmion claim rests on an exclusion argument that does not actually exclude the two-channel model. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14648 v1 pith:4FRQ5Y45 submitted 2024-11-22 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Xuan Zheng , Zengxing Lu , Bin Lao , Sheng Li , Run-Wei Li , Milan Radovic , Zhiming Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords SrRuO3IrtopologicalHalleffectanomalousskyrmionsWeylpointsultrathinheterostructuresARPES
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to settle whether hump-like features in the Hall effect of ultrathin SrRuO3 come from magnetic skyrmions or from a superposition of opposite anomalous Hall signals. Its strategy is to grow SrRuO3 on a thick SrIrO3 buffer, which keeps the ruthenate metallic and ferromagnetic down to one monolayer and fixes the anomalous Hall sign negative over a wide range of thickness and temperature. Hump-like features appear in the 20+6 and 20+8 heterostructures while the AHE sign stays negative, which the authors argue excludes the two-channel artifact. If the paper is right, the humps are intrinsic topological Hall signals and skyrmions exist in SrRuO3 at the few-unit-cell limit, opening a path to skyrmion devices in oxide heterostructures.

What carries the argument

The central object is the [SrIrO3]20/[SrRuO3]n heterostructure. The 20-unit-cell SrIrO3 buffer supplies the interfacial doping and strain that keep SrRuO3 metallic and ferromagnetic down to one monolayer and, the authors argue, shift the band structure gradually with thickness so the anomalous Hall sign does not flip. That fixed sign is the identifying tool: when a hump-like feature appears in the symmetrized Hall loops of the n=6 and n=8 samples at fixed negative AHE, the two-channel superposition explanation is excluded. ARPES on the same type of stack tracks the X-M-X band crossing previously assigned to Weyl points, connecting the transport signature to momentum-space topology.

What would settle it

A bare 20 u.c. SrIrO3 film measured under the same symmetrization should show no hump or anomalous Hall signal; if it does, the 20+n humps cannot be assigned to SrRuO3 skyrmions. A complementary check is whether a two-channel model with fixed total AHE sign can reproduce the n=6 and n=8 humps; if it can, the exclusion argument loses its force.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that a 20-unit-cell SrIrO3 buffer stabilizes a metallic ferromagnetic state in SrRuO3 down to n=1, that ARPES shows the topological band dispersion survives at these thicknesses, and that the anomalous Hall resistivity remains negative over n=1-8 and temperatures from 10 K to 90 K. In this regime, the n=6 and n=8 heterostructures show hump-like Hall features. Because the humps appear without any AHE sign change, the authors conclude the two-channel explanation -- a superposition of opposite AHE signals from different thickness or interface regions -- cannot produce them, and the humps are intrinsic topological Hall signals from magnetic skyrmions.

Load-bearing premise

The Hall signal measured on the full 20+n stack, after subtracting the normal Hall effect, is entirely attributable to the SrRuO3 layer, with the SrIrO3 buffer and the interface contributing no anomalous or topological Hall signal of their own.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The topological band structure of SrRuO3 survives to the monolayer limit when interfaced with SrIrO3, so transport probes of Weyl and skyrmion physics become possible at two-dimensional thicknesses.
  • A Hall hump observed together with a fixed AHE sign can be used as a criterion for an intrinsic topological Hall effect in oxide heterostructures.
  • The thick SrIrO3 buffer extends itinerant ferromagnetism and metallicity below three unit cells, where single SrRuO3 films are insulating.
  • The 20+6 and 20+8 heterostructures are candidate few-unit-cell platforms for skyrmion-based spintronic devices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's ARPES was taken on [SrIrO3]5/[SrRuO3]n stacks while transport used 20 u.c. buffers; a direct ARPES check on 20 u.c. buffers would close that transfer assumption.
  • If skyrmions are the cause, the hump amplitude should respond to the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, which can be tuned by changing SrIrO3 thickness or strain; that prediction is not made in the paper.
  • The same fixed-AHE-sign test could be applied to other magnetic oxide thin-film systems where two-channel artifacts are debated.
  • A bare SrIrO3 control and an n=5-9 thickness map would sharpen the thickness window where the hump appears; the paper does not report them.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports on [SrIrO3]20/[SrRuO3]n heterostructures grown on SrTiO3, with n = 1 to 10 monolayers. The authors claim that interfacing SrRuO3 with a 20 u.c. SrIrO3 buffer maintains metallicity and ferromagnetism down to the monolayer limit, as evidenced by transport (rho-T kinks) and SQUID magnetization. In-situ ARPES on [SrIrO3]5/[SrRuO3]n stacks is used to argue that the topological band structure is preserved at ultrathin thicknesses. Hall measurements show a negative anomalous Hall effect that persists over a wide thickness and temperature range, while hump-like features (called 'topological Hall effect') are observed in the 20+6 and 20+8 samples. The central claim is that the persistent negative AHE sign excludes a two-channel (opposite-sign AHE superposition) explanation of the hump and therefore provides evidence for skyrmions in ultrathin SrRuO3.

Significance. The paper addresses an important controversy in oxide spintronics: whether hump-like Hall features in SrRuO3 are intrinsic topological Hall signals or artifacts from superimposed anomalous Hall contributions. It provides systematic transport and ARPES data for SrRuO3 down to the monolayer limit on a SrIrO3 buffer, demonstrating metallicity, ferromagnetism, and a preserved band dispersion. The experimental dataset is a strength, particularly the thickness series and the use of in-situ ARPES. If the central exclusion argument were quantitatively established, this would be a valuable contribution. However, the logical gap in excluding the two-channel model and the absence of necessary control experiments mean that the skyrmion claim is not yet established.

major comments (5)
  1. [Results, Fig. 4 and Discussion] The inference that a persistent negative AHE sign excludes a two-channel explanation is logically incomplete. In the two-channel model, the total Hall signal is R_AHE(H) = R1(H) + R2(H), where R1 and R2 have opposite signs and different coercive fields. A hump can appear when the two channels switch at different fields, even if the total remains negative at every field, provided the negative channel dominates in magnitude. The manuscript does not perform a two-component fit of the Hall loops, nor does it provide a layer-resolved control that isolates each channel. Therefore the statement in the Results that 'The persistent negative AHE sign ... rules out the possibility of opposite AHE contributions' is not substantiated. Please provide a quantitative two-component analysis or an explicit demonstration that no positive channel of any magnitude is present.
  2. [Methods and Results, Hall measurements] No bare 20 u.c. SrIrO3 control is reported. All Hall measurements are performed on full 20+n stacks, and the 'anomalous Hall signal' is operationally defined by symmetrisation and subtraction of the normal Hall effect. Without a measurement of the 20 u.c. SrIrO3 film alone, the possible anomalous or topological Hall contribution from the buffer and the interface cannot be excluded. This omission is load-bearing because the claim that the AHE sign is negative for SrRuO3 requires that the measured signal be attributable to SrRuO3 rather than to the SrIrO3 buffer or interface.
  3. [Fig. 2 and Fig. 3, ARPES versus transport stacks] The ARPES data in Fig. 2 were obtained on [SrIrO3]5/[SrRuO3]n heterostructures, whereas the transport data in Figs. 3 and 4 are on [SrIrO3]20/[SrRuO3]n stacks. The manuscript does not justify this buffer-thickness difference or state that the electronic structure is unaffected by the thicker buffer. The connection between the measured band structure and the transport-derived topological Hall effect therefore rests on an unstated transfer assumption. Please either perform ARPES on the 20 u.c.-buffered stacks or provide a reasoned justification for why the 5 u.c. result is representative.
  4. [Fig. 4(b), THE extraction] The manuscript refers to a 'THE signal' in Fig. 4(b) but does not describe how the topological Hall contribution is extracted from the AHE background. No subtraction formula, fitting procedure, or criterion is given. Without a clear definition of how the hump is isolated, the reader cannot distinguish a genuine topological Hall signal from a non-linear background or from the tail of the ordinary anomalous Hall loop. Please specify the extraction method and show the background used.
  5. [Figs. 3 and 4, reproducibility] The transport data are presented as single representative curves without error bars or sample-to-sample statistics. The central claim is that the negative AHE sign is robust over a wide thickness and temperature range. Reporting reproducibility information, such as the number of samples per thickness, the spread of the sign and magnitude of the AHE, and the field position of the hump, is necessary to substantiate this robustness claim.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Results, figure citations] The text states 'Fig. 2(a) shows the temperature dependent anomalous Hall signal,' but Fig. 2 contains the ARPES data; the temperature-dependent AHE is shown in Fig. 3(a). The figure citation should be corrected.
  2. [Results, figure citations] In the first Results paragraph, the text says 'The magnetic measurement of the hysteresis loop in Fig. 1(c) and temperature dependent magnetization in Fig. 1(d)', but the Fig. 1 caption indicates that (b) is the hysteresis loop, (c) is the resistivity, and (d) is the magnetization. The citations should be updated to match the figure panels.
  3. [Supplementary figures] Figure S2 is referenced for two different purposes: once for a single SrIrO3 ARPES map and later for the determination of the Curie temperature. Please renumber the supplementary figures so that each figure has a unique citation.
  4. [Figs. 3 and 4, thickness lists] The text states that Hall measurements were performed for SrRuO3 thicknesses of 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 10 u.c., while the Fig. 3 caption lists n = 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, and 10. The inconsistency between 4 and 5 u.c. should be resolved and the measured thicknesses stated unambiguously.
  5. [Title and Abstract] The title claims 'Manipulating ... Real-Space Topological States,' but the manuscript presents no real-space imaging; real-space skyrmions are inferred indirectly from transport. Please adjust the title or state explicitly in the text that the real-space evidence is indirect.
  6. [Methods, ARPES sentence] The Methods section contains the phrase 'The presented data presented were acquired,' which duplicates the word 'presented.' This should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the skyrmion/THE claim rests on an empirical exclusion argument, not on a fit or a self-referential definition.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain—heterostructure growth, metallicity, ARPES band structure, AHE sign, hump-like Hall features, and the inference to intrinsic THE/skyrmions—I find no step where a prediction is equivalent by construction to an input. The anomalous Hall signal is obtained by standard symmetrization, and the hump-like feature is read directly from the measured Hall loops; no parameter is fit to a subset and then renamed as a prediction. The central inference, that a persistent negative AHE sign excludes the two-channel explanation of THE, is an empirical exclusion argument. It may be logically incomplete as a matter of physics (a smaller opposite-sign channel could produce a hump while the total loop remains negative), but that is a soundness concern, not circularity: the paper does not define two-channel THE in terms of the observed sign, and the skyrmion conclusion is not the same proposition as the AHE-sign observation. The ARPES band-crossing identification relies on a prior published DFT-backed assignment [12], and the other self-references are beamline/method citations [46,47]; even if some authors overlap, these citations supply independent published evidence rather than a forced self-consistency loop. I therefore find no circular step and assign score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted constants are introduced; the central claim rests on standard measurement assumptions plus two interpretive steps, Weyl assignment from prior ARPES work and identifying the hump as THE. The most fragile premise is that the SrIrO3 buffer is electrically and magnetically inert in the measured transport, and that the 5 u.c. ARPES stack represents the 20 u.c. transport stack.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Symmetrization removes the normal Hall effect and magnetoresistance, so the residual transverse signal is the anomalous Hall effect.
    Used throughout Figures 3 and 4 to define AHE and THE; no control experiment validating the subtraction is shown.
  • domain assumption The band crossing along X-M-X in the ARPES maps is a Weyl-point signature, as assigned in ref [12], so similar dispersion implies topological states.
    The paper does not perform its own DFT or spin-resolved ARPES; it transfers the interpretation from a previous study.
  • domain assumption A hump-like Hall feature with a constant-sign AHE cannot arise from superposed opposite AHE channels, and therefore indicates an intrinsic topological Hall effect from skyrmions.
    This is the central interpretive step; other extrinsic mechanisms not involving sign changes are not experimentally excluded.
  • ad hoc to paper The 5 u.c. SrIrO3-buffered ARPES samples are representative of the 20 u.c. SrIrO3-buffered transport samples.
    Transport uses [SrIrO3]20/[SrRuO3]n while ARPES uses [SrIrO3]5/[SrRuO3]n; the buffer-thickness difference is not discussed.
  • domain assumption SrIrO3 buffer layers do not themselves contribute anomalous or topological Hall signals.
    No bare SrIrO3 control is reported; the AHE and THE are attributed entirely to SrRuO3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Manipulating Momentum-Space and Real-Space Topological States in Metallic Strontium Ruthenate Ultrathin Films." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4FRQ5Y45

@misc{pith2026241114648,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Manipulating Momentum-Space and Real-Space Topological States in Metallic Strontium Ruthenate Ultrathin Films},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4FRQ5Y45}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14648}
}
read the original abstract

SrRuO3, a 4d transition metal oxide, has gained significant interest due to its topological states in both momentum space (Weyl points) and real space (skyrmions). However, probing topological states in ultrathin SrRuO3 faces challenges such as the metal-insulator transition and questioned existence of skyrmions due to possible superposition of opposite anomalous Hall effect (AHE) signals. To address these issues, we investigate ultrathin SrRuO3/SrIrO3 heterostructures and their AHE and topological Hall effect (THE). Our results reveal metallized ultrathin SrRuO3 down to the monolayer limit with an AHE signal. ARPES measurements confirm the metallic and topological band structure of ultrathin SrRuO3. Furthermore, the AHE sign remains negative over a wide thickness range, where THE is still observed. This observation excludes the two-channel explanation of THE and provides evidence for the existence of skyrmions in ultrathin SrRuO3.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Wang and S

    J. Wang and S. C. Zhang, Topological States of Condensed Matter, Nat. Mater. 16, 1062 (2017)

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    A. Fert, N. Reyren, and V. Cros, Magnetic Skyrmions: Advances in Physics and Potential Applications, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 17031 (2017)

    2017

  3. [3]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological Insulators , Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Yan and C

    B. Yan and C. Felser, Topological Materials: Weyl Semimetals , Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 8, 337 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    A. N. Bogdanov and C. Panagopoulos, Physical Foundations and Basic Properties of Magnetic Skyrmions, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 492 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Luo and L

    S. Luo and L. You, Skyrmion Devices for Memory and Logic Applications, APL Mater. 9, 050901 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Y. Chen, D. L. Bergman, and A. A. Burkov, Weyl Fermions and the Anomalous Hall Effect in Metallic Ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 88, 125110 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Matsuno, N

    J. Matsuno, N. Ogawa, K. Yasuda, F. Kagawa, W. Koshibae, N. Nagaosa, Y. Tokura, and M. Kawasaki, Interface-Driven Topological Hall Effect in SrRuO 3-SrIrO3 Bilayer, Sci. Adv. 2, e1600304 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Sohn et al., Sign-Tunable Anomalous Hall Effect Induced by Two -Dimensional Symmetry- Protected Nodal Structures in Ferromagnetic Perovskite Thin Films, Nat

    B. Sohn et al., Sign-Tunable Anomalous Hall Effect Induced by Two -Dimensional Symmetry- Protected Nodal Structures in Ferromagnetic Perovskite Thin Films, Nat. Mater. 20, 1643 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    S. Itoh, Y. Endoh, T. Yokoo, S. Ibuka, J. G. Park, Y. Kaneko, K. S. Takahashi, Y. Tokura, and N. Nagaosa, Weyl Fermions and Spin Dynamics of Metallic Ferromagnet SrRuO3, Nat. Commun. 7, 11788 (2016)

    2016

  3. [11]

    Takiguchi et al., Quantum Transport Evidence of Weyl Fermions in an Epitaxial Ferromagnetic Oxide, Nat

    K. Takiguchi et al., Quantum Transport Evidence of Weyl Fermions in an Epitaxial Ferromagnetic Oxide, Nat. Commun. 11, 4969 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    Lin et al., Electric Field Control of the Magnetic Weyl Fermion in an Epitaxial SrRuO3(111) Thin Film, Adv

    W. Lin et al., Electric Field Control of the Magnetic Weyl Fermion in an Epitaxial SrRuO3(111) Thin Film, Adv. Mater. 33, 2101316 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Kar et al., The Thickness Dependence of Quantum Oscillations in Ferromagnetic Weyl Metal SrRuO3, Npj Quantum Mater

    U. Kar et al., The Thickness Dependence of Quantum Oscillations in Ferromagnetic Weyl Metal SrRuO3, Npj Quantum Mater. 8, 8 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Ding et al., Magnetism and Berry Phase Manipulation in an Emergent Structure of Perovskite Ruthenate by (111) Strain Engineering, Npj Quantum Mater

    Z. Ding et al., Magnetism and Berry Phase Manipulation in an Emergent Structure of Perovskite Ruthenate by (111) Strain Engineering, Npj Quantum Mater. 8, 43 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    Kaneta-Takada et al., High-Mobility Two-Dimensional Carriers from Surface Fermi Arcs in Magnetic Weyl Semimetal Films, Npj Quantum Mater

    S. Kaneta-Takada et al., High-Mobility Two-Dimensional Carriers from Surface Fermi Arcs in Magnetic Weyl Semimetal Films, Npj Quantum Mater. 7, 102 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Kaneta-Takada, Y

    S. Kaneta-Takada, Y. K. Wakabayashi, Y. Krockenberger, S. Ohya, M. Tanaka, Y. Taniyasu, and H. Yamamoto, Thickness-Dependent Quantum Transport of Weyl Fermions in Ultra -High- Quality SrRuO3 Films, Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 092408 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Z. Fang, N. Nagaosa, K. S. Takahashi, A. Asamitsu, R. Mathieu, T. Ogasawara, H. Yamada, M. Kawasaki, and Y. Tokura, The Anomalous Hall Effect and Magnetic Monopoles in Momentum Space, Science 302, 92 (2003)

    2003

  10. [18]

    Skoropata, A

    E. Skoropata, A. R. Mazza, A. Herklotz, J. M. Ok, G. Eres, M. Brahlek, T. R. Charlton, H. N. Lee, and T. Z. Ward, Post-Synthesis Control of Berry Phase Driven Magnetotransport in SrRuO3 Films, Phys. Rev. B 103, 085121 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    L. Wu, F. Wen, Y. Fu, J. H. Wilson, X. Liu, Y. Zhang, D. M. Vasiukov, M. S. Kareev, J. H. Pixley, and J. Chakhalian, Berry Phase Manipulation in Ultrathin SrRuO 3 Films, Phys. Rev. B 102, 220406 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    D. Tian, Z. Liu, S. Shen, Z. Li, Y. Zhou, H. Liu, H. Chen, and P. Yu, Manipulating Berry Curvature of SrRuO 3 Thin Films via Epitaxial Strain , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118, e2101946118 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Ohuchi, J

    Y. Ohuchi, J. Matsuno, N. Ogawa, Y. Kozuka, M. Uchida, Y. Tokura, and M. Kawasaki, Electric-Field Control of Anomalous and Topological Hall Effects in Oxide Bilayer Thin Films , Nat. Commun. 9, 213 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    K. Y. Meng et al., Observation of Nanoscale Skyrmions in SrIrO 3 /SrRuO3 Bilayers, Nano Lett. 19, 3169 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    Q. Qin, L. Liu, W. Lin, X. Shu, Q. Xie, Z. Lim, C. Li, S. He, G. M. Chow, and J. Chen, Emergence of Topological Hall Effect in a SrRuO3 Single Layer, Adv. Mater. 31, 1807008 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    Wang et al., Ferroelectrically Tunable Magnetic Skyrmions in Ultrathin Oxide Heterostructures, Nat

    L. Wang et al., Ferroelectrically Tunable Magnetic Skyrmions in Ultrathin Oxide Heterostructures, Nat. Mater. 17, 1087 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    Wang et al., Topological Hall Effect in Single Thick SrRuO 3 Layers Induced by Defect Engineering, Adv

    C. Wang et al., Topological Hall Effect in Single Thick SrRuO 3 Layers Induced by Defect Engineering, Adv. Electron. Mater. 6, 2000184 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    Sohn et al., Stable Humplike Hall Effect and Noncoplanar Spin Textures in SrRuO3 Ultrathin Films, Phys

    B. Sohn et al., Stable Humplike Hall Effect and Noncoplanar Spin Textures in SrRuO3 Ultrathin Films, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023232 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Li et al., Reversible Manipulation of the Magnetic State in SrRuO 3 through Electric-Field Controlled Proton Evolution, Nat

    Z. Li et al., Reversible Manipulation of the Magnetic State in SrRuO 3 through Electric-Field Controlled Proton Evolution, Nat. Commun. 11, 184 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Gu et al., Interfacial Oxygen -Octahedral-Tilting-Driven Electrically Tunalbe Topological Hall Effect in Ultrathin SrRuO3 Films, J

    Y. Gu et al., Interfacial Oxygen -Octahedral-Tilting-Driven Electrically Tunalbe Topological Hall Effect in Ultrathin SrRuO3 Films, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 52, 404001 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Kimbell, C

    G. Kimbell, C. Kim, W. Wu, M. Cuoco, and J. W. A. Robinson, Challenges in Identifying Chiral Spin Textures via the Topological Hall Effect, Commun. Mater. 3, 19 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Gerber, Interpretation of Experimental Evidence of the Topological Hall Effect, Phys

    A. Gerber, Interpretation of Experimental Evidence of the Topological Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. B 98, 214440 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    R. Liu, R. Xu, Y. Chen, L. Zhou, W. Zhuang, X. Zhang, C. Zhang, Z. Chen, L. Chen, and X. Wang, Interface-Induced Transverse Resistivity Anomaly in AgNbO 3/SrRuO3 Heterostructures, APL Mater. 12, 021122 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Kan and Y

    D. Kan and Y. Shimakawa, Defect-Induced Anomalous Transverse Resistivity in an Itinerant Ferromagnetic Oxide, Phys. Status Solidi (B) 255, 1800175 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    D. J. Groenendijk et al., Berry Phase Engineering at Oxide Interfaces, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023404 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    L. Wang, Q. Feng, H. G. Lee, E. K. Ko, Q. Lu, and T. W. Noh, Controllable Thickness Inhomogeneity and Berry Curvature Engineering of Anomalous Hall Effect in SrRuO3 Ultrathin Films, Nano Lett. 20, 2468 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    D. Kan, T. Moriyama, and Y. Shimakawa, Field-Sweep-Rate and Time Dependence of Transverse Resistivity Anomalies in Ultrathin SrRuO 3 Films, Phys. Rev. B 101, 014448 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    Kim et al., Inhomogeneous Ferromagnetism Mimics Signatures of the Topological Hall Effect in SrRuO3 Films, Phys

    G. Kim et al., Inhomogeneous Ferromagnetism Mimics Signatures of the Topological Hall Effect in SrRuO3 Films, Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 104410 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Kimbell, P

    G. Kimbell, P. Sass, B. Woltjes, E. K. Ko, T. W. Noh, W. Wu, and J. W. A. Robinson, Two- Channel Anomalous Hall Effect in SrRuO3, Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 054414 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Roy et al., Origin of Topological Hall -Like Feature in Epitaxial SrRuO 3 Thin Films, Adv

    P. Roy et al., Origin of Topological Hall -Like Feature in Epitaxial SrRuO 3 Thin Films, Adv. Electron. Mater. 9, 2300020 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Kaneta -Takada, Y

    S. Kaneta -Takada, Y. K. Wakabayashi, Y. Krockenberger, H. Irie, S. Ohya, M. Tanaka, Y. Taniyasu, and H. Yamamoto, Scattering-Dependent Transport of SrRuO 3 Films: From Weyl Fermion Transport to Hump-like Hall Effect Anomaly, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 54406 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Y. J. Chang, C. H. Kim, S. Phark, Y. S. Kim, J. Yu, and T. W. Noh, Fundamental Thickness Limit of Itinerant Ferromagnetic SrRuO3 Thin Films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 057201 (2009)

    2009

  33. [41]

    Toyota et al., Thickness-Dependent Electronic Structure of Ultrathin SrRuO 3 Films Studied by in Situ Photoemission Spectroscopy, Appl

    D. Toyota et al., Thickness-Dependent Electronic Structure of Ultrathin SrRuO 3 Films Studied by in Situ Photoemission Spectroscopy, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 162508 (2005)

    2005

  34. [42]

    D. Kan, T. Moriyama, K. Kobayashi, and Y. Shimakawa, Alternative to the Topological Interpretation of the Transverse Resistivity Anomalies in SrRuO 3, Phys. Rev. B 98, 180408 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    Wysocki, L

    L. Wysocki, L. Yang, F. Gunkel, R. Dittmann, P. H. M. van Loosdrecht, and I. Lindfors-Vrejoiu, Validity of Magnetotransport Detection of Skyrmions in Epitaxial SrRuO 3 Heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 054402 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    S. M. Young and C. L. Kane, Dirac Semimetals in Two Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 126803 (2015)

    2015

  37. [45]

    Bhattacharyya, G

    S. Bhattacharyya, G. Akhgar, M. Gebert, J. Karel, M. T. Edmonds, and M. S. Fuhrer, Recent Progress in Proximity Coupling of Magnetism to Topological Insulators , Adv. Mater. 33, 2007795 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    Sassa, M

    Y . Sassa, M. Radović, M. Månsson, E. Razzoli, X. Y . Cui, S. Pailhès, S. Guerrero, M. Shi, and P. R. Willmott, F. Miletto Granozio, J. Mesot, M. R. Norman , and L. Patthey, Ortho-II band folding in YBa 2Cu3O7−𝛿 films revealed by angle-resolved photoemission, Phys. Rev. B 83, ...

    2011

  39. [47]

    Caputo, Z

    M. Caputo, Z. Ristic, R. S. Dhaka , T. Das, Z. Wang, C. E. Matt, N. C. Plumb , E. B. Guedes , J. Jandke, M. Naamneh , A. Zakharova , M. Medarde , M. Shi , L. Patthey , J. Mesot , C. Piamonteze, and M. Radović , Proximity-Induced Novel Ferromagnetism Accompanied with Resolute M...

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.