Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 226 references

Hybrid ferroelectric tunnel junctions: State-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A review argues that ferroelectric polarization can control resonant tunneling and negative differential resistance at room temperature, opening a route to low-power nonvolatile memory and neuromorphic devices.

desk verdict Useful, honest review of hybrid FTJs and FeRTDs, but the 'radically new' FeRTD claim rests on a thin experimental base that the text itself concedes. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14670 v1 pith:2JAZO4LF submitted 2024-11-22 cond-mat.mes-hall

classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords ferroelectrictunneljunctionresonanttunnelingnegativedifferentialresistanceelectroresistancequantumwell2DvanderWaalsferroelectricsmultiferroichafnia
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This perspective argues that the next step beyond simple ferroelectric tunnel junctions is the hybrid junction, where electrons tunnel through a functional layer in series with an ultrathin ferroelectric film, and beyond that, the ferroelectric resonant tunneling diode, where a quantum well replaces the single ferroelectric barrier. The paper's central proposition is that resonant tunneling offers a radically new way to exploit tunneling in ferroelectric heterostructures, because ferroelectric polarization can shift the confined energy levels in the well and thereby control the resonant peak, the current ratio at the peak, and the negative differential resistance at room temperature. If this is right, hybrid junctions and FeRTDs become credible building blocks for low-energy, high-speed, nonvolatile memory and for neuromorphic and multi-state logic that go beyond what simple FTJs offer.

What carries the argument

The central object is the FeRTD: a double-barrier quantum-well structure, typically a ferroelectric layer acting as a barrier or as the well, in which electrons tunnel resonantly when their injection energy aligns with a discrete quantized level of the well. Reversing the ferroelectric polarization changes the electrostatic potential profile across the structure, shifting the quantized levels and hence the resonant bias, the peak current, and the onset of negative differential resistance; the same polarization effect, when applied to a hybrid FTJ, acts by modulating the barrier height or width asymmetry at the ferroelectric/functional-layer interface. A key variant is the head-to-head domain wall inside a single ferroelectric film, which creates a V-shaped potential profile that acts as a barrier/well/barrier structure equivalent to a quantum well. These mechanisms convert ferroelectric polarization into a shift of the tunneling resonance, which is what the paper argues constitutes a radically new way to exploit ferroelectric heterostructures.

What would settle it

A decisive test is to fabricate the same junction stack with the ferroelectric layer replaced by a non-polar insulator of similar thickness and dielectric constant, such as SrTiO3 in place of BaTiO3, and to measure the NDR peak voltage and OFF/ON ratio: if the NDR features persist with comparable magnitude and shift only with bias polarity rather than with poling history, the ferroelectric-switching mechanism is falsified. A complementary observation is to correlate the ON/OFF state and the NDR peak shift with a direct piezoresponse force microscopy hysteresis measurement of the active device area: the absence of a switchable out-of-plane polarization in the device region would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that ferroelectric polarization can be used to actively control resonant tunneling and the associated negative differential resistance at room temperature, and it assembles the experimental and theoretical evidence for this claim across four hybrid junction families: ferroelectric/dielectric, ferroelectric/multiferroic, ferroelectric/superconducting, and ferroelectric/2D van der Waals junctions, culminating in FeRTDs. The flagship demonstration is the authors' own BTO/SRO/BTO FeRTD, where a metallic SRO quantum well is confined between ferroelectric BaTiO3 barriers; that device shows the hallmarks of resonant tunneling followed by NDR at room temperature, with a large OFF/ON resistance ratio of about 2×$10^{4}$ that is modulated by polarization reversal. The paper further asserts that 2D van der Waals ferroelectrics such as CIPS and α-In2Se3 can deliver giant tunneling electroresistance (up to $10^{7}$–$10^{9}$) and solve scalability and stability problems, and that ferroelectric/dielectric composite barriers can amplify TER through polarization-switchable 2DEGs or through quasi-resonant states in the dielectric. In short, the review seeks to establish the hybrid FTJ and FeRTD as a flexible platform in which ferroelectric polarization does not merely modulate a direct tunnel barrier, but reshapes the entire quantum-transport spectrum.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the resistance switching and negative differential resistance reported in the cited hybrid junctions genuinely originate from ferroelectric polarization reversal, not from oxygen-vacancy motion, redox reactions, or other ionic or defect dynamics; the paper itself concedes this is doubtful for the superconducting junctions and for Li-doped ZnO.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, resonant tunneling in FeRTDs can replace direct tunneling in ferroelectric memories, yielding OFF/ON resistance ratios that are orders of magnitude larger than those of conventional FTJs.
  • Room-temperature ferroelectric control of NDR would enable nonvolatile multi-valued logic and oscillator or amplifier functions in a single device, moving beyond simple two-state memory.
  • Integration of 2D van der Waals ferroelectrics or HfO2-based ferroelectrics with composite barriers would improve scalability, reduce the read voltage, and address the high resistance-area product that has limited perovskite-based FTJs.
  • The multiferroic variant, combining ferroelectric control of tunneling with ferromagnetic electrodes, should give four distinct resistance states (two ferroelectric times two magnetic), enabling denser storage and neuromorphic weight encoding.
  • Superconducting and 2D superconducting hybrid junctions could link nonvolatile ferroelectric switching with superconducting transport, opening a path to electrically controlled superconducting memories.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the paper's own evidence suggests that the ferroelectric mechanism is not the only plausible explanation in several flagship demonstrations; if a non-ferroelectric interpretation such as oxygen-vacancy or redox-mediated switching gains ground, the FeRTD roadmap would shift toward materials and interfaces that suppress ionic motion, not just toward better epitaxy.
  • Editorial inference: the triangular-well mechanism shown for BTO/STO composite barriers implies that quasi-resonant peaks may appear in many asymmetric composite-barrier FTJs even without a deliberately engineered quantum well, which would mean FeRTD-like behavior is more widespread than the label suggests.
  • Editorial inference: a direct testable extension of the paper's outlook would be to replace the metallic SRO well with a strongly correlated oxide or a 2D superconducting layer, coupling the resonant-tunneling resonance to a metal–insulator transition or to superconductivity; such a device would either confirm the universality of the polarization-controlled resonance or reveal that the BTO/SRO/BTO
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a perspective/review of hybrid ferroelectric tunnel junctions (FTJs), defined as junctions in which electrons tunnel through a functional layer in series with an ultrathin ferroelectric barrier. It surveys ferroelectric/dielectric composite-barrier junctions, ferroelectric/multiferroic junctions, ferroelectric/2D-material junctions, ferroelectric/superconductor junctions, and ferroelectric resonant tunneling diodes (FeRTDs). The central claim is that ferroelectric polarization can control resonant tunneling and negative differential resistance (NDR) at room temperature, so that FeRTDs constitute a new device class for nonvolatile memory and neuromorphic computing. The review explicitly acknowledges some caveats, including redox-dominated switching in YBCO-based superconductor junctions and doubts about Li-doped ZnO ferroelectricity, but the FeRTD outlook is built primarily on the authors' own BTO/SRO/BTO demonstration [188].

Significance. As a synthesis, the paper is useful: it brings together a wide literature, is mostly traceable to peer-reviewed sources, and is candid about electrochemical complications in superconducting and oxide systems. The conceptual framing of hybrid FTJs and FeRTDs is clear, and the figures are generally informative. The significance of the central claim is high if it holds: polarization-controlled room-temperature resonant tunneling would indeed add a distinct functionality to oxide electronics. However, the central perspective is only as strong as the experimental evidence for ferroelectric control of NDR, and that evidence is concentrated in the authors' own previous work; the review does not present independent corroboration or new mechanistic analysis. For this reason the manuscript needs revision before the claim can carry the weight the authors place on it.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.5b and Section 4] The paper's core proposition—that ferroelectric polarization controls resonant tunneling and NDR at room temperature—is not established by the cited evidence. The only room-temperature FeRTD demonstration is the BTO/SRO/BTO device reported by the authors in [188], and the text states that NDR was 'attributed to the growth of orthorhombic SRO and the electron-electron correlations between its Ru-t2g and Ru-eg states.' No control experiments or independent measurements are described that exclude non-ferroelectric mechanisms such as oxygen-vacancy migration, interface redox, or trap-assisted conduction. Given that Section 2.4 concedes that redox reactions and oxygen stoichiometry dominate resistance switching in YBCO-based junctions, and Section 2.5a concedes that the Li-doped ZnO FeRTDs are questionable because their hysteresis may be defect-mediated, the room-temperature experimental base for the FeRTD proposition is too thin. Please either add a critical discussion of the mechanistic evidence in [188] (e.g., polarization-dependence of the NDR peak, retention/endurance data, comparison with non-ferroelectric control samples) or soften the central claim to a perspective-level proposal rather than an established phenomenon.
  2. [Section 2.5b] The sentence 'In 2022, we resolved this longstanding problem by fabricating a FeRTD with a QW heterostructure comprised of BTO/SRO/BTO' is a first-person, self-referential claim that is not appropriate in a review without the same critical scrutiny applied to other cited works. The phrase 'we resolved' also overstates what a single demonstration establishes, especially when the accompanying assertion of 'the largest OFF/ON resistance ratios values in tunneling devices that utilize BTO as the barriers' is itself drawn from [188]. Please rephrase neutrally and state explicitly what [188] does and does not prove.
  3. [FeRTD section (unnumbered, after Section 2.4)] The paper defines FeRTDs as not strictly differentiated from FTJs that exhibit resonant tunneling. This ambiguity makes the central claim difficult to falsify: if any FTJ showing a current peak is labelled a FeRTD, then the 'radically new approach' becomes a matter of terminology rather than a new physical regime. Please clarify the operational distinction, for example by specifying the required double-barrier/quantum-well geometry and the criterion for ferroelectric control of the resonance.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Introduction and section numbering] The Introduction promises that FeRTDs are reviewed in Section 3, but the FeRTD material appears in an unnumbered section with subsections 2.5–2.7, and the following sections are numbered 3 and 4; please renumber consistently.
  2. [Figure 11b caption] The caption says 'BTO/STO/BTO FeRTD' while the text and Section 2.5b describe BTO/SRO/BTO; correct the mismatch.
  3. [Abstract] The abstract contains a grammatically incomplete phrase: 'enabling further modalities and functional capabilities than in addition to tunneling electroresistance.'
  4. [Section 2.3 (introductory paragraph)] The text lists 'MoS2, WeS' among 2D materials; this should be 'MoS2, WSe2' (or the intended material written correctly).
  5. [Section 2.1c] The phrase 'Si or Ge substate' should be 'Si or Ge substrate'.
  6. [Figure 9 caption] The caption describes panels a–c and then e) for the I–V curve, but no panel d) is identified; the panel labels should be corrected.
  7. [Reference list] Reference [190] lacks a year in the reference list; the citation should be completed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the perspective is a literature synthesis; its own-work citations point to externally published experimental results and are not constructions that reduce to the review's claims.

full rationale

This is a perspective/review, not a derivation, so there is no equation chain whose outputs equal its inputs. The closest self-referential elements are citations to the authors' own prior work: ref [188] (BTO/SRO/BTO FeRTD) is described as 'we resolved this longstanding problem', and ref [18] is the authors' earlier FTJ review. These are not circular in the prohibited sense: they cite externally published experimental/DFT results (Advanced Materials 2022; Applied Physics Reviews 2020) with stated mechanisms, and the review does not fit any parameter to data and then rename it a prediction. The conceded limitations (Section 2.4: ferroelectricity 'did not play a central role' in MoSi/YBCO and MoSi/BFO/YBCO junctions; Section 2.5a: Li-doped ZnO hysteresis may be defect-mediated; Section 3: redox/oxygen-motion mechanisms in YBCO/Al and YBCO/ITO junctions) are uncertainty about mechanism, not circularity; they weaken the evidence base for the FeRTD outlook but do not make the outlook equivalent to its inputs. The definition of 'hybrid ferroelectric tunneling' is a scope choice, and the statement that the authors 'do not strictly differentiate between FeRTDs and FTJs that have resonant tunneling effect' is a labeling convention, not a self-fulfilling derivation. Hence no specific circular step can be quoted and exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a review, so the ledger contains no free parameters fitted by the authors and no newly invented physical entities. The claims rest on standard quantum tunneling theory and on the reliability and correct interpretation of the cited experiments and first-principles calculations. The axioms above capture the background assumptions the review inherits from the literature.

assumptions (3)
  • standard math Resonant tunneling and NDR can be described by single-particle quantum transport through double-barrier quantum wells.
    Used throughout Section 2 on FeRTDs, particularly in the introduction to resonant tunneling (Figure 9) and in interpreting NDR in BTO/SRO/BTO [188].
  • domain assumption Ultrathin ferroelectric layers retain switchable polarization down to a few nanometers or monolayers.
    Runs through Sections 2.1 and 2.3, for example the 1 nm HZO/SiO2 barrier and 2D vdW ferroelectrics, without independent verification in this paper.
  • domain assumption Cited experimental values of TER, OFF/ON ratios, and NDR are accurate and correctly interpretable.
    The perspective builds its outlook on literature results, while also noting contested cases such as MoSi/YBCO ferroelectric role and Li-doped ZnO ferroelectricity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hybrid ferroelectric tunnel junctions: State-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2JAZO4LF

@misc{pith2026241114670,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hybrid ferroelectric tunnel junctions: State-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2JAZO4LF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14670}
}
read the original abstract

Ferroelectric tunnel junctions (FTJs) harness the unique combination of ferroelectricity and quantum tunneling, and thus herald new opportunities in next-generation nonvolatile memory technologies. Recent advancements in the fabrication of ultrathin heterostructures have enabled the integration of ferroelectrics with various functional materials, forming hybrid tunneling-diode junctions. These junctions benefit from the modulation of the functional layer/ferroelectric interface through ferroelectric polarization, thus enabling further modalities and functional capabilities than in addition to tunneling electroresistance. This perspective aims to provide in-depth insight into novel physical phenomena of several typical ferroelectric hybrid junctions, ranging from ferroelectric/dielectric, ferroelectric/multiferroic, ferroelectric/superconducting to ferroelectric/2D materials, and finally their expansion into the realm of ferroelectric resonant tunneling diodes (FeRTDs). This latter aspect, i.e., resonant tunneling offers a radically new approach to exploiting tunneling behavior in ferroelectric heterostructures. We discuss examples that have successfully shown room temperature ferroelectric control of parameters such as the resonant peak, tunnel current ratio at peak and negative differential resistance. We conclude the perspective by summarizing the challenges and highlighting the opportunities for the future development of hybrid FTJs with a special emphasis on a new possible type of FeRTD device. The prospects for enhanced performance and expanded functionality ignite tremendous excitement in hybrid FTJs and FeRTDs for future nanoelectronics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.14670 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematics of the structures and potential energy profiles of a typical Metal (M1)/Ferroelectric (FE)/Metal (M2) FTJ. a,b) show the ferroelectric polarization pointing to the left and right, respectively. and indicate the difference in average barrier height, and EF is the Fermi level. In TER, one exploits the interplay between electron tunneling and ferroelectric polarization. This then leads to the notion of polar… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Schematic diagrams illustrating respective perspectives of tunneling heterostructures. a) At the La1- xCrxMnO3 (LCMO)/FE interface, dependent on the direction of the ferroelectric, the MIT induces a change of LCMO to metallic when there is hole accumulation (i) to insulating when there is hole depletion (ii). b) In a prototypical MFTJ, for either polarization direction the spins could be either parallel (i) or anti-… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

226 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [180]

    R. Du, X. Qiu, A. Li, D. Wu, Applied Physics Letters 2014, 104, 142907. 43

  2. [188]

    Z. Ma, Q. Zhang, L. Tao, Y. Wang, D. Sando, J. Zhou, Y. Guo, M. Lord, P. Zhou, Y. Ruan, Z. Wang, A. Hamilton, A. Gruverman, E. Y. Tsymbal, T. Zhang, N. Valanoor, Advanced Materials 2022, 34, 2205359

  3. [1]

    S. M. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, Wiley, 1981

  4. [2]

    Kohlstedt, N

    H. Kohlstedt, N. A. Pertsev, J. Rodríguez Contreras, R. Waser, Phys. Rev. B 2005, 72, 125341

  5. [3]

    E. Y. Tsymbal, H. Kohlstedt, Science 2006, 313, 181

  6. [4]

    Julliere, Physics Letters A 1975, 54, 225

    M. Julliere, Physics Letters A 1975, 54, 225

  7. [5]

    Giaever, Phys

    I. Giaever, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1960, 5, 147

  8. [6]

    Kohlstedt, N

    H. Kohlstedt, N. A. Pertsev, R. Waser, MRS Proceedings 2001, 688, C6.5.1

Show all 226 references
  1. [7]

    M. E. Lines, A. M. Glass, Principles and Applications of Ferroelectrics and Related Materials , Oxford University Press, 2001

  2. [8]

    M. Ye. Zhuravlev, R. F. Sabirianov, S. S. Jaswal, E. Y. Tsymbal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94, 246802

  3. [9]

    J. F. Scott, C. A. Paz De Araujo, Science 1989, 246, 1400

  4. [10]

    J. Y. Park, D. Choe, D. H. Lee, G. T. Yu, K. Yang, S. H. Kim, G. H. Park, S. Nam, H. J. Lee, S. Jo, B. J. Kuh, D. Ha, Y. Kim, J. Heo, M. H. Park, Advanced Materials 2023, 35, 2204904

  5. [11]

    V. Y. Shur, In Ferroelectric Thin Films: Synthesis and Basic Properties (Eds: C. A. Paz de Araujo, J. F. Scott, G. W. Taylor), Gordon & Breach Science Publishers, London, UK, 1996

  6. [12]

    Junquera, P

    J. Junquera, P. Ghosez, Nature 2003, 422, 506

  7. [13]

    D. D. Fong, G. B. Stephenson, S. K. Streiffer, J. A. Eastman, O. Auciello, P. H. Fuoss, C. Thompson, Science 2004, 304, 1650

  8. [14]

    D. A. Tenne, P. Turner, J. D. Schmidt, M. Biegalski, Y. L. Li, L. Q. Chen, A. Soukiassian, S. Trolier - McKinstry, D. G. Schlom, X. X. Xi, D. D. Fong, P. H. Fuoss, J. A. Eastman, G. B. Stephenson, C. Thompson, S. K. Streiffer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 177601

  9. [15]

    A. V. Bune, V. M. Fridkin, S. Ducharme, L. M. Blinov, S. P. Palto, A. V. Sorokin, S. G. Yudin, A. Zlatkin, Nature 1998, 391, 874

  10. [16]

    P. Gao, Z. Zhang, M. Li, R. Ishikawa, B. Feng, H. -J. Liu, Y.-L. Huang, N. Shibata, X. Ma, S. Chen, J. Zhang, K. Liu, E. -G. Wang, D. Yu, L. Liao, Y. -H. Chu, Y. Ikuhara, Nature Communications 2017, 8, 15549

  11. [17]

    Y. J. Shin, Y. Kim, S.-J. Kang, H.-H. Nahm, P. Murugavel, J. R. Kim, M. R. Cho, L. Wang, S. M. Yang, J.-G. Yoon, J. -S. Chung, M. Kim, H. Zhou, S. H. Chang, T. W. Noh, Advanced Materials 2017, 29, 1602795

  12. [18]

    Z. Ma, Q. Zhang, N. Valanoor, Applied Physics Reviews 2020, 7, 041316

  13. [19]

    Garcia, S

    V. Garcia, S. Fusil, K. Bouzehouane, S. Enouz-Vedrenne, N. D. Mathur, A. Barthélémy, M. Bibes, Nature 2009, 460, 81

  14. [20]

    Gajek, M

    M. Gajek, M. Bibes, S. Fusil, K. Bouzehouane, J. Fontcuberta, A. Barthélémy, A. Fert, Nature Materials 2007, 6, 296

  15. [21]

    N. A. Pertsev, A. G. Zembilgotov, A. K. Tagantsev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 80, 1988

  16. [22]

    K. J. Choi, M. Biegalski, Y. L. Li, A. Sharan, J. Schubert, R. Uecker, P. Reiche, Y. B. Chen, X. Q. Pan, V. Gopalan, L.-Q. Chen, D. G. Schlom, C. B. Eom, Science 2004, 306, 1005

  17. [23]

    Ederer, N

    C. Ederer, N. A. Spaldin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95, 257601

  18. [24]

    Yamada, V

    H. Yamada, V. Garcia, S. Fusil, S. Boyn, M. Marinova, A. Gloter, S. Xavier, J. Grollier, E. Jacquet, C. Carrétéro, C. Deranlot, M. Bibes, A. Barthélémy, ACS Nano 2013, 7, 5385

  19. [25]

    Z. Wen, C. Li, D. Wu, A. Li, N. Ming, Nature Materials 2013, 12, 617

  20. [26]

    E. Y. Tsymbal, A. Gruverman, Nature Mater 2013, 12, 602. 37

  21. [27]

    Z. Ma, L. Li, Y. Wang, P. Zhou, Y. Guo, Y. Liu, K. Liang, Y. Qi, T. Zhang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020, 116, 032903

  22. [28]

    Chanthbouala, V

    A. Chanthbouala, V. Garcia, R. O. Cherifi, K. Bouzehouane, S. Fusil, X. Moya, S. Xavier, H. Yamada, C. Deranlot, N. D. Mathur, M. Bibes, A. Barthélémy, J. Grollier, Nature Mater 2012, 11, 860

  23. [29]

    J. Li, C. Ge, J. Du, C. Wang, G. Yang, K. Jin, Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1905764

  24. [30]

    H. Wang, Z. Guan, J. Li, Z. Luo, X. Du, Z. Wang, H. Zhao, S. Shen, Y. Yin, X. Li, Advanced Materials 2024, 36, 2211305

  25. [31]

    Jiang, W

    L. Jiang, W. S. Choi, H. Jeen, S. Dong, Y. Kim, M.-G. Han, Y. Zhu, S. V. Kalinin, E. Dagotto, T. Egami, H. N. Lee, Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 5837

  26. [32]

    Y. W. Yin, J. D. Burton, Y. -M. Kim, A. Y. Borisevich, S. J. Pennycook, S. M. Yang, T. W. Noh, A. Gruverman, X. G. Li, E. Y. Tsymbal, Q. Li, Nature Mater 2013, 12, 397

  27. [33]

    Rouco, R

    V. Rouco, R. E. Hage, A. Sander, J. Grandal, K. Seurre, X. Palermo, J. Briatico, S. Collin, J. Trastoy, K. Bouzehouane, A. I. Buzdin, G. Singh, N. Bergeal, C. Feuillet -Palma, J. Lesueur, C. Leon, M. Varela, J. Santamaría, J. E. Villegas, Nat Commun 2020, 11, 658

  28. [34]

    Hwang, Y

    J. Hwang, Y. Goh, S. Jeon, Small 2024, 20, 2305271

  29. [35]

    Z. Wen, D. Wu, Advanced Materials 2020, 32, 1904123

  30. [36]

    M. Ye. Zhuravlev, Y. Wang, S. Maekawa, E. Y. Tsymbal, Applied Physics Letters 2009, 95, 052902

  31. [37]

    R. Guo, Z. Wang, S. Zeng, K. Han, L. Huang, D. G. Schlom, T. Venkatesan, Ariando, J. Chen, Scientific Reports 2015, 5, 12576

  32. [38]

    L. Wang, M. R. Cho, Y. J. Shin, J. R. Kim, S. Das, J.-G. Yoon, J.-S. Chung, T. W. Noh, Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 3911

  33. [39]

    Y. Wang, Q. Zhang, J. Zhou, J. Liu, Z. Ma, P. Zhou, T. Zhang, N. Valanoor, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020, 116, 202901

  34. [40]

    Aguado-Puente, N

    P. Aguado-Puente, N. C. Bristowe, B. Yin, R. Shirasawa, P. Ghosez, P. B. Littlewood, E. Artacho, Phys. Rev. B 2015, 92, 035438

  35. [41]

    Mallik, G

    S. Mallik, G. C. Ménard, G. Saïz, H. Witt, J. Lesueur, A. Gloter, L. Benfatto, M. Bibes, N. Bergeal, Nature Communications 2022, 13, 4625

  36. [42]

    S. Wang, H. Zhang, J. Zhang, S. Li, D. Luo, J. Wang, K. Jin, J. Sun, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022, 128, 187401

  37. [43]

    Chen, D.-Y

    X.-H. Chen, D.-Y. Hou, Z.-X. Hu, K.-H. Gao, Z.-Q. Li, Phys. Rev. B 2023, 107, 165411

  38. [44]

    Ohtomo, H

    A. Ohtomo, H. Y. Hwang, Nature 2004, 427, 423

  39. [45]

    H. Lee, N. Campbell, J. Lee, T. J. Asel, T. R. Paudel, H. Zhou, J. W. Lee, B. Noesges, J. Seo, B. Park, L. J. Brillson, S. H. Oh, E. Y. Tsymbal, M. S. Rzchowski, C. B. Eom, Nature Materials 2018, 17, 231

  40. [46]

    Q. Wu, L. Shen, M. Yang, J. Zhou, J. Chen, Y. P. Feng, Phys. Rev. B 2016, 94, 155420

  41. [47]

    Q. Yang, L. Tao, Y. Zhang, M. Li, Z. Jiang, E. Y. Tsymbal, V. Alexandrov, Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 7385

  42. [48]

    T. S. Böscke, J. Müller, D. Bräuhaus, U. Schröder, U. Böttger, Applied Physics Letters 2011, 99, 102903

  43. [49]

    Kang, W.-S

    S. Kang, W.-S. Jang, A. N. Morozovska, O. Kwon, Y. Jin, Y.-H. Kim, H. Bae, C. Wang, S.-H. Yang, A. Belianinov, S. Randolph, E. A. Eliseev, L. Collins, Y. Park, S. Jo, M. -H. Jung, K.-J. Go, H. W. Cho, S.- Y. Choi, J. H. Jang, S. Kim, H. Y. Jeong, J. Lee , O. S. Ovchinnikova, J...

  44. [50]

    C. Zhou, L. Ma, Y. Feng, C. -Y. Kuo, Y.-C. Ku, C.-E. Liu, X. Cheng, J. Li, Y. Si, H. Huang, Y. Huang, H. Zhao, C.-F. Chang, S. Das, S. Liu, Z. Chen, Nature Communications 2024, 15, 2893

  45. [51]

    S. S. Cheema, D. Kwon, N. Shanker, R. dos Reis, S.-L. Hsu, J. Xiao, H. Zhang, R. Wagner, A. Datar, M. R. McCarter, C. R. Serrao, A. K. Yadav, G. Karbasian, C.-H. Hsu, A. J. Tan, L.-C. Wang, V. Thakare, X. Zhang, A. Mehta, E. Karapetrova, R. V. Chopdekar, P. Shafer, E. Arenholz...

  46. [52]

    S. Shi, H. Xi, T. Cao, W. Lin, Z. Liu, J. Niu, D. Lan, C. Zhou, J. Cao, H. Su, T. Zhao, P. Yang, Y. Zhu, X. Yan, E. Y. Tsymbal, H. Tian, J. Chen, Nature Communications 2023, 14, 1780

  47. [53]

    Mikheev, A

    V. Mikheev, A. Chouprik, Y. Lebedinskii, S. Zarubin, Y. Matveyev, E. Kondratyuk, M. G. Kozodaev, A. M. Markeev, A. Zenkevich, D. Negrov, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 32108

  48. [54]

    Mikheev, A

    V. Mikheev, A. Chouprik, Y. Lebedinskii, S. Zarubin, A. M. Markeev, A. V. Zenkevich, D. Negrov, Nanotechnology 2020, 31, 215205

  49. [55]

    D. Kim, J. Kim, S. Yun, J. Lee, E. Seo, S. Kim, Nanoscale 2023, 15, 8366

  50. [56]

    Hwang, Y

    J. Hwang, Y. Goh, S. Jeon, IEEE Electron Device Letters 2020, 41, 1193

  51. [57]

    R. -H. Koo, W. Shin, S. Ryu, K. Lee, S. -H. Park, J. Im, J. -H. Ko, J. -H. Kim, D. Kwon, J. -J. Kim, D. Kwon, J. -H. Lee, IEEE Electron Device Letters 2023, 44, 1624

  52. [58]

    J. Yu, K. K. Min, Y. Kim, S. Kim, S. Hwang, T. -H. Kim, C. Kim, H. Kim, J. -H. Lee, D. Kwon, B. -G. Park, Nanotechnology 2021, 32, 485202

  53. [59]

    Hwang, Y

    J. Hwang, Y. Goh, S. Jeon, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2021, 68, 841

  54. [60]

    Y. -S. Kuo, S. -Y. Lee, C. -C. Lee, S. -W. Li, T. -S. Chao, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 2021, 68, 879

  55. [61]

    K. Xu, T. Wang, Y. Liu, J. Yu, Z. Li, J. Meng, H. Zhu, Q. Sun, D. W. Zhang, L. Chen, ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2024, 6, 1055

  56. [62]

    Shekhawat, H

    A. Shekhawat, H. A. Hsain, Y. Lee, J. L. Jones, S. Moghaddam, Nanotechnology 2021, 32, 485204

  57. [63]

    Shajil Nair, M

    K. Shajil Nair, M. Holzer, C. Dubourdieu, V. Deshpande, ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2023, 5, 1478

  58. [64]

    B. Max, M. Hoffmann, S. Slesazeck, T. Mikolajick, in 2018 48th European Solid-State Device Research Conference (ESSDERC), 2018, pp. 142–145

  59. [65]

    M. C. Sulzbach, S. Estandía, J. Gàzquez, F. Sánchez, I. Fina, J. Fontcuberta, Advanced Functional Materials 2020, 30, 2002638

  60. [66]

    Y. Lee, S. Song, W. Ham, S.-E. Ahn, Materials 2022, 15, 2251

  61. [67]

    Y. Goh, J. Hwang, M. Kim, Y. Lee, M. Jung, S. Jeon, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 59422

  62. [68]

    Manchon, G

    B. Manchon, G. Segantini, N. Baboux, P. Rojo Romeo, R. Barhoumi, I. C. Infante, F. Alibart, D. Drouin, B. Vilquin, D. Deleruyelle, physica status solidi (RRL) – Rapid Research Letters 2022, 16, 2100585

  63. [69]

    S. S. Cheema, N. Shanker, C. -H. Hsu, A. Datar, J. Bae, D. Kwon, S. Salahuddin, Advanced Electronic Materials 2022, 8, 2100499

  64. [70]

    Fujii, Y

    S. Fujii, Y. Kamimuta, T. Ino, Y. Nakasaki, R. Takaishi, M. Saitoh, in 2016 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology, 2016, pp. 1–2

  65. [71]

    Chang, G

    P. Chang, G. Du, J. Kang, X. Liu, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 2021, 68, 3526

  66. [72]

    K. Lee, J. Byun, K. Park, S. Kang, M. S. Song, J. Park, J. Lee, S. C. Chae, Applied Materials Today 2022, 26, 101308

  67. [73]

    Hoffmann, J

    M. Hoffmann, J. A. Murdzek, S. M. George, S. Slesazeck, U. Schroeder, T. Mikolajick, Applied Physics Letters 2022, 120, 122901

  68. [74]

    J. Wang, D. Wang, Q. Li, A. Zhang, D. Gao, M. Guo, J. Feng, Z. Fan, D. Chen, M. Qin, M. Zeng, X. Gao, G. Zhou, X. Lu, J. . -M. Liu, IEEE Electron Device Letters 2019, 40, 1937

  69. [75]

    Y. Xu, Y. Yang, S. Zhao, T. Gong, P. Jiang, S. Lv, H. Yu, P. Yuan, Z. Dang, Y. Ding, Y. Wang, Y. Chen, Y. Wang, J. Bi, Q. Luo, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 2022, 69, 430

  70. [76]

    Johnson, J

    B. Johnson, J. L. Jones, in Ferroelectricity in Doped Hafnium Oxide: Materials, Properties and Devices (Eds.: U. Schroeder, C. S. Hwang, H. Funakubo), Woodhead Publishing, 2019, pp. 25–45

  71. [77]

    Padovani, L

    A. Padovani, L. Larcher, in 2018 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS) , 2018, p. 39 3A.2–1

  72. [78]

    K. K. Min, J. Yu, Y. Kim, J.-H. Lee, D. Kwon, B.-G. Park, Nanotechnology 2021, 32, 495203

  73. [79]

    Toriumi, L

    A. Toriumi, L. Xu, Y. Mori, X. Tian, P. D. Lomenzo, H. Mulaosmanovic, M. Materano, T. Mikolajick, U. Schroeder, in 2019 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2019, p. 15.1.1-15.1.4

  74. [80]

    Kimura, T

    T. Kimura, T. Goto, H. Shintani, K. Ishizaka, T. Arima, Y. Tokura, Nature 2003, 426, 55

  75. [81]

    Garcia, M

    V. Garcia, M. Bibes, L. Bocher, S. Valencia, F. Kronast, A. Crassous, X. Moya, S. Enouz -Vedrenne, A. Gloter, D. Imhoff, C. Deranlot, N. D. Mathur, S. Fusil, K. Bouzehouane, A. Barthélémy, Science 2010, 327, 1106

  76. [82]

    H. Lu, T. A. George, Y. Wang, I. Ketsman, J. D. Burton, C. -W. Bark, S. Ryu, D. J. Kim, J. Wang, C. Binek, P. A. Dowben, A. Sokolov, C. -B. Eom, E. Y. Tsymbal, A. Gruverman, Applied Physics Letters 2012, 100, 232904

  77. [83]

    Zheng, X

    X. Zheng, X. Zuo, Y. Liu, C. Chen, B. Cui, S. Xu, Journal of Applied Physics 2024, 135, 144101

  78. [84]

    B. Chi, L. Jiang, Y. Zhu, L. Tao, X. Han, Applied Physics Letters 2023, 123, 053501

  79. [85]

    Y. Yin, X. Jiang, M. A. Koten, J. E. Shield, X. Chen, Y. Yun, A. T. N’Diaye, X. Hong, X. Xu, Phys. Rev. Appl. 2020, 13, 064011

  80. [86]

    Barthélémy, M

    A. Barthélémy, M. Bibes, V. Garcia, A. Gruverman, E. Y. Tsymbal, MRS Bulletin 2012, 37, 138

  81. [87]

    X. Gao, S. Liang, A. Ferri, W. Huang, D. Rouxel, X. Devaux, X.-G. Li, H. Yang, M. Chshiev, R. Desfeux, A. Da Costa, G. Hu, M. Stoffel, A. Nachawaty, C. Jiang, Z. Zeng, J. -P. Liu, H. Yang, Y. Lu, Applied Physics Letters 2020, 116, 152905

  82. [88]

    Tornos, F

    J. Tornos, F. Gallego, S. Valencia, Y. H. Liu, V. Rouco, V. Lauter, R. Abrudan, C. Luo, H. Ryll, Q. Wang, D. Hernandez-Martin, G. Orfila, M. Cabero, F. Cuellar, D. Arias, F. J. Mompean, M. Garcia -Hernandez, F. Radu, T. R. Charlton, A. Rivera-Calzada, Z. Sefrioui, S. G. E. te ...

  83. [89]

    Z. Cui, B. Sa, K. -H. Xue, Y. Zhang, R. Xiong, C. Wen, X. Miao, Z. Sun, Nanoscale 2024, 10.1039.D3NR04712A

  84. [90]

    Y. Su, X. Li, M. Zhu, J. Zhang, L. You, E. Y. Tsymbal, Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 175

  85. [91]

    Y. Ohno, D. K. Young, B. Beschoten, F. Matsukura, H. Ohno, D. D. Awschalom, Nature 1999, 402, 790

  86. [92]

    Fiederling, M

    R. Fiederling, M. Keim, G. Reuscher, W. Ossau, G. Schmidt, A. Waag, L. W. Molenkamp, Nature 1999, 402, 787

  87. [93]

    M. Ye. Zhuravlev, S. S. Jaswal, E. Y. Tsymbal, R. F. Sabirianov, Applied Physics Letters 2005, 87, 222114

  88. [94]

    Fechner, S

    M. Fechner, S. Ostanin, I. Mertig, Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80, 094405

  89. [95]

    Zhang, Phys

    S. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 83, 640

  90. [96]

    Zhang, Y

    L. Zhang, Y. Wang, X. Liu, F. Liu, npj Computational Materials 2022, 8, 197

  91. [97]

    Cesaria, A

    M. Cesaria, A. P. Caricato, G. Maruccio, M. Martino, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2011, 292, 012003

  92. [98]

    F. Y. Bruno, M. N. Grisolia, C. Visani, S. Valencia, M. Varela, R. Abrudan, J. Tornos, A. Rivera-Calzada, A. A. Ünal, S. J. Pennycook, Z. Sefrioui, C. Leon, J. E. Villegas, J. Santamaria, A. Barthélémy, M. Bibes, Nature Communications 2015, 6, 6306

  93. [99]

    Pantel, S

    D. Pantel, S. Goetze, D. Hesse, M. Alexe, Nature Materials 2012, 11, 289

  94. [100]

    Rouco, F

    V. Rouco, F. Gallego, D. Hernandez-Martin, D. Sanchez-Manzano, J. Tornos, J. I. Beltran, M. Cabero, F. Cuellar, D. Arias, G. Sanchez-Santolino, F. J. Mompean, M. Garcia-Hernandez, A. Rivera-Calzada, M. Varela, M. C. Muñoz, C. Leon, Z. Sefrioui, J. Santamaria, APL Materials 202...

  95. [101]

    Hambe, A

    M. Hambe, A. Petraru, N. A. Pertsev, P. Munroe, V. Nagarajan, H. Kohlstedt, Advanced Functional 40 Materials 2010, 20, 2436

  96. [102]

    J. P. Velev, C.-G. Duan, J. D. Burton, A. Smogunov, M. K. Niranjan, E. Tosatti, S. S. Jaswal, E. Y. Tsymbal, Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 427

  97. [103]

    X. Chi, R. Guo, J. Xiong, L. Ren, X. Peng, B. K. Tay, J. Chen, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 56638

  98. [104]

    L. N. Jiang, Y.-P. Wang, Y. Zhu, X. F. Han, Phys. Rev. B 2022, 105, 134410

  99. [105]

    J. Ruan, X. Qiu, Z. Yuan, D. Ji, P. Wang, A. Li, D. Wu, Applied Physics Letters 2015, 107, 232902

  100. [106]

    Y. W. Yin, M. Raju, W. J. Hu, J. D. Burton, Y. -M. Kim, A. Y. Borisevich, S. J. Pennycook, S. M. Yang, T. W. Noh, A. Gruverman, X. G. Li, Z. D. Zhang, E. Y. Tsymbal, Q. Li, Journal of Applied Physics 2015, 117, 172601

  101. [107]

    Kolodiazhnyi, M

    T. Kolodiazhnyi, M. Tachibana, H. Kawaji, J. Hwang, E. Takayama -Muromachi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 104, 147602

  102. [108]

    L. N. Jiang, Y.-P. Wang, W. Z. Chen, X. F. Han, Phys. Rev. B 2021, 103, 214441

  103. [109]

    K. S. Novoselov, A. Mishchenko, A. Carvalho, A. H. Castro Neto, Science 2016, 353, aac9439

  104. [110]

    X. Liu, M. C. Hersam, Nature Reviews Materials 2019, 4, 669

  105. [111]

    A. K. Geim, I. V. Grigorieva, Nature 2013, 499, 419

  106. [112]

    K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S. V. Dubonos, I. V. Grigorieva, A. A. Firsov, Science 2004, 306, 666

  107. [113]

    F. Liu, L. You, K. L. Seyler, X. Li, P. Yu, J. Lin, X. Wang, J. Zhou, H. Wang, H. He, S. T. Pantelides, W. Zhou, P. Sharma, X. Xu, P. M. Ajayan, J. Wang, Z. Liu, Nat Commun 2016, 7, 12357

  108. [114]

    Z. Zhou, S. Wang, Z. Zhou, Y. Hu, Q. Li, J. Xue, Z. Feng, Q. Yan, Z. Luo, Y. Weng, R. Tang, X. Su, F. Zheng, K. Okamoto, H. Funakubo, L. Kang, L. Fang, L. You, Nat Commun 2023, 14, 8254

  109. [115]

    M. Zhao, G. Gou, X. Ding, J. Sun, Nanoscale 2020, 12, 12522

  110. [116]

    S. Li, F. Wang, Y. Wang, J. Yang, X. Wang, X. Zhan, J. He, Z. Wang, Advanced Materials 2024, 36, 2301472

  111. [117]

    L. Qi, S. Ruan, Y. Zeng, Advanced Materials 2021, 33, 2005098

  112. [118]

    S. Wan, Y. Li, W. Li, X. Mao, C. Wang, C. Chen, J. Dong, A. Nie, J. Xiang, Z. Liu, W. Zhu, H. Zeng, Advanced Functional Materials 2019, 29, 1808606

  113. [119]

    H. Wang, Y. Wen, H. Zeng, Z. Xiong, Y. Tu, H. Zhu, R. Cheng, L. Yin, J. Jiang, B. Zhai, C. Liu, C. Shan, J. He, Advanced Materials 2023, n/a, 2305044

  114. [120]

    R. Pal, J. J. Abraham, A. Mistonov, S. Mishra, N. Stilkerich, S. Mondal, P. Mandal, A. N. Pal, J. Geck, B. Büchner, V. Kataev, A. Alfonsov, Adv Funct Materials 2024, 2402551

  115. [121]

    Li, X.-Y

    Y. Li, X.-Y. Sun, C.-Y. Xu, J. Cao, Z.-Y. Sun, L. Zhen, Nanoscale 2018, 10, 23080

  116. [122]

    H. Lu, A. Lipatov, S. Ryu, D. J. Kim, H. Lee, M. Y. Zhuravlev, C. B. Eom, E. Y. Tsymbal, A. Sinitskii, A. Gruverman, Nature Communications 2014, 5, 5518

  117. [123]

    Luo, M.-M

    Z.-D. Luo, M.-M. Yang, Y. Liu, M. Alexe, Advanced Materials 2021, 33, 2005620

  118. [124]

    Y. Jia, Q. Yang, Y. -W. Fang, Y. Lu, M. Xie, J. Wei, J. Tian, L. Zhang, R. Yang, Nature Communications 2024, 15, 693

  119. [125]

    Z. Q. Li, E. A. Henriksen, Z. Jiang, Z. Hao, M. C. Martin, P. Kim, H. L. Stormer, D. N. Basov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 037403

  120. [126]

    M. H. Yusuf, A. Gura, X. Du, M. Dawber, 2D Mater. 2017, 4, 021022

  121. [127]

    H. Yang, J. Heo, S. Park, H. J. Song, D. H. Seo, K. -E. Byun, P. Kim, I. Yoo, H. -J. Chung, K. Kim, Science 2012, 336, 1140

  122. [128]

    Gruverman, D

    A. Gruverman, D. Wu, H. Lu, Y. Wang, H. W. Jang, C. M. Folkman, M. Ye. Zhuravlev, D. Felker, 41 M. Rzchowski, C.-B. Eom, E. Y. Tsymbal, Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 3539

  123. [129]

    Y. Yoon, K. Ganapathi, S. Salahuddin, Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 3768

  124. [130]

    Radisavljevic, A

    B. Radisavljevic, A. Radenovic, J. Brivio, V. Giacometti, A. Kis, Nature Nanotechnology 2011, 6, 147

  125. [131]

    D. J. Kim, H. Lu, S. Ryu, S. Lee, C. W. Bark, C. B. Eom, A. Gruverman, Applied Physics Letters 2013, 103, 142908

  126. [132]

    T. Li, P. Sharma, A. Lipatov, H. Lee, J.-W. Lee, M. Y. Zhuravlev, T. R. Paudel, Y. A. Genenko, C.- B. Eom, E. Y. Tsymbal, A. Sinitskii, A. Gruverman, Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 922

  127. [133]

    S. Yuan, X. Luo, H. L. Chan, C. Xiao, Y. Dai, M. Xie, J. Hao, Nature Communications 2019, 10, 1775

  128. [134]

    Xue, J.-H

    F. Xue, J.-H. He, X. Zhang, Applied Physics Reviews 2021, 8, 021316

  129. [135]

    K. Y. Ma, L. Zhang, S. Jin, Y. Wang, S. I. Yoon, H. Hwang, J. Oh, D. S. Jeong, M. Wang, S. Chatterjee, G. Kim, A.-R. Jang, J. Yang, S. Ryu, H. Y. Jeong, R. S. Ruoff, M. Chhowalla, F. Ding, H. S. Shin, Nature 2022, 606, 88

  130. [136]

    Y.-M. Lin, A. Valdes-Garcia, S.-J. Han, D. B. Farmer, I. Meric, Y. Sun, Y. Wu, C. Dimitrakopoulos, A. Grill, P. Avouris, K. A. Jenkins, Science 2011, 332, 1294

  131. [137]

    J. Li, N. Li, C. Ge, H. Huang, Y. Sun, P. Gao, M. He, C. Wang, G. Yang, K. Jin, iScience 2019, 16, 368

  132. [138]

    Z. Xi, J. Ruan, C. Li, C. Zheng, Z. Wen, J. Dai, A. Li, D. Wu, Nat Commun 2017, 8, 15217

  133. [139]

    J. Wu, H. -Y. Chen, N. Yang, J. Cao, X. Yan, F. Liu, Q. Sun, X. Ling, J. Guo, H. Wang, Nature Electronics 2020, 3, 466

  134. [140]

    Q. Wang, T. Xie, N. A. Blumenschein, Z. Song, J. C. Kotsakidis, A. T. Hanbicki, M. A. Susner, B. S. Conner, Q. Tan, S. H. Lee, Z. Mao, X. Ling, T. Low, J. -P. Wang, A. L. Friedman, C. Gong, Matter 2022, 5, 4425

  135. [141]

    Balakrishnan, E

    N. Balakrishnan, E. D. Steer, E. F. Smith, Z. R. Kudrynskyi, Z. D. Kovalyuk, L. Eaves, A. Patanè, P. H. Beton, 2D Materials 2018, 5, 035026

  136. [142]

    Y. Zhou, D. Wu, Y. Zhu, Y. Cho, Q. He, X. Yang, K. Herrera, Z. Chu, Y. Han, M. C. Downer, H. Peng, K. Lai, Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 5508

  137. [143]

    W. Yang, B. Cheng, J. Hou, J. Deng, X. Ding, J. Sun, J. Z. Liu, Small Methods 2023, 7, 2300050

  138. [144]

    W. Tang, X. Zhang, H. Yu, L. Gao, Q. Zhang, X. Wei, M. Hong, L. Gu, Q. Liao, Z. Kang, Z. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Small Methods 2022, 6, 2101583

  139. [145]

    Zhang, X

    Y. Zhang, X. Li, J. Sheng, S. Yu, J. Zhang, Y. Su, Applied Physics Letters 2023, 123, 192402

  140. [146]

    Z. Yan, Z. Li, Y. Han, Z. Qiao, X. Xu, Phys. Rev. B 2022, 105, 075423

  141. [147]

    J. Yang, J. Zhou, J. Lu, Z. Luo, J. Yang, L. Shen, Mater. Horiz. 2022, 9, 1422

  142. [148]

    X. Dong, X. Shen, X. Sun, Y. Bai, Z. Yan, X. Xu, Phys. Rev. B 2023, 108, 085427

  143. [149]

    E. Y. Tsymbal, Science 2021, 372, 1389

  144. [150]

    L. Li, M. Wu, ACS Nano 2017, 11, 6382

  145. [151]

    Pavlenko, Phys

    N. Pavlenko, Phys. Rev. B 2004, 70, 094519

  146. [152]

    D. R. Klein, L.-Q. Xia, D. MacNeill, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Jarillo-Herrero, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2023, 18, 331

  147. [153]

    D. Z. Haxell, E. Cheah, F. Křížek, R. Schott, M. F. Ritter, M. Hinderling, W. Belzig, C. Bruder, W. Wegscheider, H. Riel, F. Nichele, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023, 130, 087002

  148. [154]

    K. S. Takahashi, M. Gabay, D. Jaccard, K. Shibuya, T. Ohnishi, M. Lippmaa, J.-M. Triscone, Nature 2006, 441, 195. 42

  149. [155]

    Bégon-Lours, V

    L. Bégon-Lours, V. Rouco, A. Sander, J. Trastoy, R. Bernard, E. Jacquet, K. Bouzehouane, S. Fusil, V. Garcia, A. Barthélémy, M. Bibes, J. Santamaría, J. E. Villegas, Phys. Rev. Applied 2017, 7, 064015

  150. [156]

    Suleiman, M

    M. Suleiman, M. F. Sarott, M. Trassin, M. Badarne, Y. Ivry, Applied Physics Letters 2021, 119, 112601

  151. [157]

    M. K. Wu, J. R. Ashburn, C. J. Torng, P. H. Hor, R. L. Meng, L. Gao, Z. J. Huang, Y. Q. Wang, C. W. Chu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987, 58, 908

  152. [158]

    E. S. Nurbaisyatul, H. Azhan, A. Kasim, N. Ibrahim, SSP 2020, 307, 104

  153. [159]

    S.-M. Kim, S. Y. Lee, Thin Solid Films 1999, 355–356, 461

  154. [160]

    R. J. Cava, B. Batlogg, C. H. Chen, E. A. Rietman, S. M. Zahurak, D. Werder, Nature 1987, 329, 423

  155. [161]

    Alcalà, A

    J. Alcalà, A. Fernández -Rodríguez, T. Günkel, A. Barrera, M. Cabero, J. Gazquez, L. Balcells, N. Mestres, A. Palau, Scientific Reports 2024, 14, 1939

  156. [162]

    W. E. Farneth, R. K. Bordia, E. M. McCarron, M. K. Crawford, R. B. Flippen, Solid State Communications 1988, 66, 953

  157. [163]

    Crassous, R

    A. Crassous, R. Bernard, S. Fusil, K. Bouzehouane, J. Briatico, M. Bibes, A. Barthélémy, J. E. Villegas, Journal of Applied Physics 2013, 113, 024910

  158. [164]

    Ravikant, R. K. Rakshit, M. Singh, R. S. Katiyar, V. N. Ojha, A. Kumar, Europhysics Letters 2018, 122, 57002

  159. [165]

    El Hage, V

    R. El Hage, V. Humbert, V. Rouco, G. Sánchez -Santolino, A. Lagarrigue, K. Seurre, S. J. Carreira, A. Sander, J. Charliac, S. Mesoraca, J. Trastoy, J. Briatico, J. Santamaría, J. E. Villegas, Nat Commun 2023, 14, 3010

  160. [166]

    Lagarrigue, C

    A. Lagarrigue, C. de Dios, S. J. Carreira, V. Humbert, S. Mesoraca, J. Briatico, J. Trastoy, J. E. Villegas, Superconductor Science and Technology 2024, 37, 045007

  161. [167]

    L. L. Chang, E. E. Méndez, C. Tejedor, Resonant Tunneling in Semiconductors : Physics and Applications, Plenum Press, New York, 1991

  162. [168]

    Zheng, S

    S. Zheng, S. Jo, K. Kang, L. Sun, M. Zhao, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Moon, N. Myoung, H. Yang, Advanced Materials 2020, 32, 1906942

  163. [169]

    Zhang, B

    Z. Zhang, B. Zhang, Y. Wang, M. Wang, Y. Zhang, H. Li, J. Zhang, A. Song, Nano Lett. 2023, 23, 8132

  164. [170]

    F. Liu, J. Xue, J. Yao, G. Wu, Z. Li, R. Liu, Z. Guo, K. Zhang, J. Zhang, Y. Hao, Applied Physics Letters 2024, 124, 073501

  165. [171]

    Alhazmi, O

    A. Alhazmi, O. Alolaiyan, M. Alharbi, S. Alghamdi, A. Alsulami, F. Alamri, S. Albawardi, G. Aljalham, S. Alsaggaf, K. Alhamdan, Moh. R. Amer, Advanced Functional Materials 2022, 32, 2110251

  166. [172]

    C. Li, M. Guan, H. Hong, K. Chen, X. Wang, H. Ma, A. Wang, Z. Li, H. Hu, J. Xiao, J. Dai, X. Wan, K. Liu, S. Meng, Q. Dai, Science Advances 2023, 9, eadf4170

  167. [173]

    R. Tsu, L. Esaki, Applied Physics Letters 1973, 22, 562

  168. [174]

    Bohm, Quantum Theory, Prentice Hall, New Jesey, 1951

    D. Bohm, Quantum Theory, Prentice Hall, New Jesey, 1951

  169. [175]

    L. L. Chang, L. Esaki, R. Tsu, Applied Physics Letters 1974, 24, 593

  170. [176]

    M. K. Li, N. M. Kim, T. W. Kang, Applied Physics Letters 2007, 91, 103103

  171. [177]

    M. K. Li, N. M. Kim, S. J. Lee, J. W. Kim, T. W. Kang, Phys. Rev. B 2007, 75, 212106

  172. [178]

    A. O. Akira Onodera, N. T. Norihiko Tamaki, Y. K. Yuko Kawamura, T. S. Takuya Sawada, H. Y. Haruyasu Yamashita, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 1996, 35, 5160

  173. [179]

    J. F. Scott, International Scholarly Research Notices 2013, 2013, 187313

  174. [181]

    J. Su, J. Li, X. Zheng, S. Xie, X. Liu, npj Computational Materials 2022, 8, 54

  175. [182]

    Zheng, Y

    X. Zheng, Y. Yang, Q. Zhang, J. Li, X. Liu, Applied Physics Letters 2022, 121, 132902

  176. [183]

    J. Su, X. Zheng, Z. Wen, T. Li, S. Xie, K. M. Rabe, X. Liu, E. Y. Tsymbal, Phys. Rev. B 2021, 104, L060101

  177. [184]

    Chang, Y

    P. Chang, Y. Xie, IEEE Electron Device Letters 2023, 44, 168

  178. [185]

    Encomendero, V

    J. Encomendero, V. Protasenko, D. Jena, H. G. Xing, Phys. Rev. B 2023, 107, 125301

  179. [186]

    Y. Cho, J. Encomendero, S.-T. Ho, H. G. Xing, D. Jena, Applied Physics Letters 2020, 117, 143501

  180. [187]

    Zhang, L

    B. Zhang, L. Yang, D. Wang, P. Quach, S. Sheng, D. Li, T. Wang, B. Sheng, T. Li, J. Yang, Y. Yuan, B. Shen, X. Wang, Applied Physics Letters 2022, 121, 192107

  181. [189]

    W. S. Choi, S. A. Lee, J. H. You, S. Lee, H. N. Lee, Nature Communications 2015, 6, 7424

  182. [190]

    Sharma, Q

    P. Sharma, Q. Zhang, D. Sando, C. H. Lei, Y. Liu, J. Li, V. Nagarajan, J. Seidel, Science Advances n.d., 3, e1700512

  183. [191]

    Meier, S

    D. Meier, S. M. Selbach, Nature Reviews Materials 2022, 7, 157

  184. [192]

    Sanchez-Santolino, J

    G. Sanchez-Santolino, J. Tornos, D. Hernandez -Martin, J. I. Beltran, C. Munuera, M. Cabero, A. Perez-Muñoz, J. Ricote, F. Mompean, M. Garcia-Hernandez, Z. Sefrioui, C. Leon, S. J. Pennycook, M. C. Muñoz, M. Varela, J. Santamaria, Nature Nanotechnology 2017, 12, 655

  185. [193]

    M. Li, L. L. Tao, J. P. Velev, E. Y. Tsymbal, Phys. Rev. B 2018, 97, 155121

  186. [194]

    C.-G. Duan, R. F. Sabirianov, W.-N. Mei, S. S. Jaswal, E. Y. Tsymbal, Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 483

  187. [195]

    Ipsita, S

    S. Ipsita, S. Ku. Sahu, P. K. Mahapatra, Ferroelectrics 2024, 618, 69

  188. [196]

    Tanoue, H

    T. Tanoue, H. Mizuta, S. Takahashi, IEEE Electron Device Letters 1988, 9, 365

  189. [197]

    Mizuta, T

    H. Mizuta, T. Tanoue, S. Takahashi, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 1988, 35, 1951

  190. [198]

    Chang, J

    P. Chang, J. Li, Y. Guo, Y. Xie, L. Zeng, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 2024, 71, 2210

  191. [199]

    Z. Ma, T. Zhang, K. Liang, Y. Qi, D. Wang, J. Wang, J. Jiang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104, 222904

  192. [200]

    S. Boyn, V. Garcia, S. Fusil, C. Carrétéro, K. Garcia, S. Xavier, S. Collin, C. Deranlot, M. Bibes, A. Barthélémy, APL Materials 2015, 3, 061101

  193. [201]

    Raghavan, S

    S. Raghavan, S. James Allen, S. Stemmer, Applied Physics Letters 2013, 103, 212103

  194. [202]

    J. D. Burton, J. P. Velev, E. Y. Tsymbal, Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80, 115408

  195. [203]

    Yukawa, M

    R. Yukawa, M. Kobayashi, T. Kanda, D. Shiga, K. Yoshimatsu, S. Ishibashi, M. Minohara, M. Kitamura, K. Horiba, A. F. Santander-Syro, H. Kumigashira, Nature Communications 2021, 12, 7070

  196. [204]

    Y. Zhou, S. Ramanathan, Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences 2013, 38, 286

  197. [205]

    C. H. Ahn, J.-M. Triscone, J. Mannhart, Nature 2003, 424, 1015

  198. [206]

    Yin, W.-C

    Y.-W. Yin, W.-C. Huang, Y.-K. Liu, S.-W. Yang, S.-N. Dong, J. Tao, Y. -M. Zhu, Q. Li, X. -G. Li, Advanced Electronic Materials 2015, 1, 1500183

  199. [207]

    X. Chi, H. Wang, R. Guo, T. J. Whitcher, X. Yu, P. Yang, X. Yan, M. B. H. Breese, K. P. Loh, J. Chen, A. Rusydi, Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 1101

  200. [208]

    Chanthbouala, A

    A. Chanthbouala, A. Crassous, V. Garcia, K. Bouzehouane, S. Fusil, X. Moya, J. Allibe, B. Dlubak, J. Grollier, S. Xavier, C. Deranlot, A. Moshar, R. Proksch, N. D. Mathur, M. Bibes, A. Barthélémy, Nature Nanotechnology 2012, 7, 101

  201. [209]

    Zhang, P

    D. Zhang, P. Schoenherr, P. Sharma, J. Seidel, Nat Rev Mater 2022, 8, 25

  202. [210]

    J. Chen, W. Qin, P. Cui, Z. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 2023, 108, L060501

  203. [211]

    C. H. Ahn, J.-M. Triscone, N. Archibald, M. Decroux, R. H. Hammond, T. H. Geballe, Ø. Fischer, 44 M. R. Beasley, Science 1995, 269, 373

  204. [212]

    Jin Hu, Z

    W. Jin Hu, Z. Wang, W. Yu, T. Wu, Nat Commun 2016, 7, 10808

  205. [213]

    Fatemi, S

    V. Fatemi, S. Wu, Y. Cao, L. Bretheau, Q. D. Gibson, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. J. Cava, P. Jarillo-Herrero, Science 2018, 362, 926

  206. [214]

    Jindal, A

    A. Jindal, A. Saha, Z. Li, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. C. Hone, T. Birol, R. M. Fernandes, C. R. Dean, A. N. Pasupathy, D. A. Rhodes, Nature 2023, 613, 48

  207. [215]

    B. Zhai, B. Li, Y. Wen, F. Wu, J. He, Phys. Rev. B 2022, 106, L140505

  208. [216]

    S. Boyn, J. Grollier, G. Lecerf, B. Xu, N. Locatelli, S. Fusil, S. Girod, C. Carrétéro, K. Garcia, S. Xavier, J. Tomas, L. Bellaiche, M. Bibes, A. Barthélémy, S. Saïghi, V. Garcia, Nat Commun 2017, 8, 14736

  209. [217]

    Garcia, M

    V. Garcia, M. Bibes, Nature Communications 2014, 5, 4289

  210. [218]

    N. R. Mahapatra, B. Venkatrao, XRDS 1999, 5, 2

  211. [219]

    M. M. Waldrop, Nature 2016, 530, 144

  212. [220]

    D. V. Christensen, R. Dittmann, B. Linares -Barranco, A. Sebastian, M. Le Gallo, A. Redaelli, S. Slesazeck, T. Mikolajick, S. Spiga, S. Menzel, I. Valov, G. Milano, C. Ricciardi, S.-J. Liang, F. Miao, M. Lanza, T. J. Quill, S. T. Keene, A. Salleo, J. Grollier, D. Marković, A. ...

  213. [221]

    Mikolajick, M

    T. Mikolajick, M. H. Park, L. Begon‐Lours, S. Slesazeck, Advanced Materials 2023, 35, 2206042

  214. [222]

    E. Covi, H. Mulaosmanovic, B. Max, S. Slesazeck, T. Mikolajick, Neuromorphic Computing and Engineering 2022, 2, 012002

  215. [223]

    H. Béa, S. Fusil, K. Bouzehouane, M. Bibes, M. Sirena, G. Herranz, E. Jacquet, J. -P. Contour, A. Barthélémy, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 2006, 45, L187

  216. [224]

    Evgeny Y Tsymbal, Oleg N Mryasov, Patrick R LeClair, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 2003, 15, R109

  217. [225]

    F. A. Cuellar, Y. H. Liu, J. Salafranca, N. Nemes, E. Iborra, G. Sanchez-Santolino, M. Varela, M. G. Hernandez, J. W. Freeland, M. Zhernenkov, M. R. Fitzsimmons, S. Okamoto, S. J. Pennycook, M. Bibes, A. Barthélémy, S. G. E. te Velthuis, Z. Sefrioui, C. Leon, J. Santamaria, Na...

  218. [226]

    Chang, Y

    P. Chang, Y. Xie, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 2023, 70, 2282

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.