Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 63 references

Magnetic resonance frequency of two-sublattice ferrimagnet with magnetic compensation temperature

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper derives closed-form resonance-frequency formulas for a two-sublattice ferrimagnet, valid for in-plane and out-of-plane magnetizations over all temperatures, and reproduces pump-probe and Brillouin scattering data on two garnets…

desk verdict A useful analytic addition to ferrimagnetic resonance phenomenology, with an experimental comparison that is suggestive rather than decisive because key inputs are reconstructed or fitted. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14792 v1 pith:QDO5XSMB submitted 2024-11-22 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Kouki Mikuni , Toshiki Hiraoka , Takumi Kuramoto , Yasuhiro Fujii , Akitoshi Koreeda , Sergii Parchenko , Andrzej Stupakiewicz , Takuya Satoh This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords ferrimagneticresonancecompensationtemperaturetwo-sublatticeferrimagnetLandau-Lifshitz-GilbertequationexchangemodeBrillouinlightscatteringtime-resolvedmagneto-opticalFaradayrotationrare-earthirongarnet
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper derives two analytic formulas, Eqs. (5) and (6), for the magnetic resonance frequencies of a two-sublattice ferrimagnet—a magnet with two oppositely aligned sublattice moments—and argues they remain valid at every temperature, including at the magnetization-compensation point $T_M$ where the net moment vanishes. The formulas are obtained by linearizing the coupled Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equations around the equilibrium configuration for both in-plane and out-of-plane magnetizations. The paper shows they reproduce temperature-dependent resonance frequencies measured by time-resolved magneto-optical Faraday rotation (in-plane) and Brillouin light scattering (out-of-plane) on two bismuth-doped rare-earth iron garnets, GdYb-BIG and Gd-BIG, using one parameter set for the molecular field and exchange stiffness. Far from $T_M$, the formulas reduce to the conventional ferromagnetic-resonance and exchange-resonance approximations, so the new expressions extend rather than replace existing models.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the two-sublattice Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equation driven by a free-energy density $\Phi$ (Eq. (2)) that includes the Zeeman energy, the exchange coupling $\lambda\mathbf{M}_1\cdot\mathbf{M}_2$, uniaxial anisotropy terms, demagnetizing energy, and exchange-stiffness terms. Linearizing these coupled equations for small oscillations around equilibrium and solving the resulting secular determinant yields a quartic equation whose roots are the resonance frequencies; Eqs. (5) and (6) are the closed-form solutions. The exchange-stiffness terms are what let the model describe the backscattering magnon mode observed in Brillouin scattering, and the temperature-dependent anisotropy, reconstructed from $H_u^{\mathrm{FMR}}=4K/(M_1-M_2)$ by interpolation, is what lets the same formulas track the modes through the compensation region.

What would settle it

Measure $K_1(T)$ and $K_2(T)$ independently on the same garnet crystals using a technique such as torque magnetometry, then recompute Eqs. (5) and (6); if the independently measured anisotropies do not reproduce the observed low- and high-frequency modes near $T_M$, the equal-anisotropy interpolation is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Eqs. (5) and (6) are closed-form analytical solutions for the two resonance branches (low-frequency and high-frequency) of a two-sublattice ferrimagnet with uniaxial anisotropy, for magnetization in the plane and perpendicular to the plane respectively. The solutions contain the molecular-field coefficient $\lambda$, sublattice magnetizations $M_1$ and $M_2$, gyromagnetic ratios $\gamma_1$ and $\gamma_2$, uniaxial anisotropies $K_1$ and $K_2$, demagnetizing fields, and exchange-stiffness terms $A_i k^2$. The paper demonstrates that these formulas reproduce the measured temperature dependence of both the low- and high-frequency modes in GdYb-BIG and Gd-BIG, that they reduce to the conventional ferromagnetic-resonance and exchange-resonance equations far from $T_M$, and that the out-of-plane expression is consistent with a previously derived analytical result for a perpendicular applied field.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the two sublattices share one temperature-dependent uniaxial anisotropy, recovered by interpolating a measured anisotropy field that diverges at the compensation temperature; if that reconstructed $K(T)$ is wrong, the apparent agreement with the resonance data does not test the model.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Far from $T_M$, Eqs. (5) and (6) reduce to the conventional ferromagnetic-resonance and exchange-resonance formulas, so existing analyses remain valid and the new expressions show precisely where those approximations break down.
  • The formulas retain wavevector dependence through the exchange-stiffness terms $A_i k^2$, so they can describe the backscattering magnon mode in Brillouin light scattering as well as the uniform precession seen in pump-probe experiments.
  • The same molecular-field and exchange-stiffness parameters reproduce both the in-plane and out-of-plane data for each garnet, giving a single consistent parameter set for both geometries.
  • At $T_M$, with equal sublattice moments and equal gyromagnetic ratios, the out-of-plane formula reduces to the antiferromagnetic resonance expression $\omega=\gamma[\pm H_0+\sqrt{H_u(H_u+2\lambda M)}]$, connecting compensated ferrimagnets to antiferromagnetic resonance physics.
  • Because the formulas do not require identical gyromagnetic ratios, they extend to ferrimagnets whose magnetization and angular-momentum compensation temperatures do not coincide, the systems used for fast domain-wall motion and skyrmion racetracks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension would be to invert Eqs. (5) and (6) as a fitting protocol for extracting the molecular-field coefficient and exchange stiffness from resonance data on other compensated ferrimagnets; the paper only demonstrates parameter extraction for the two garnets it studies.
  • Because the formulas depend on wavevector $k$, they are ready-made for computing spin-wave dispersion across the compensation temperature; the paper itself reports only the uniform and backscattering modes, not a full dispersion analysis.
  • The equal-anisotropy assumption ($K_1=K_2=K$) could be tested by allowing distinct sublattice anisotropies; a systematic shift in the predicted low- or high-frequency mode near $T_M$ would show how much of the agreement depends on that simplification.
  • In the tilted equilibrium region near $T_M$ the paper switches to numerical solution; a fully analytic treatment of the noncollinear phase would be a direct follow-up.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper derives closed-form expressions, Eqs. (5) and (6), for the two magnetic-resonance frequencies of a two-sublattice ferrimagnet with uniaxial anisotropy, for in-plane and out-of-plane equilibrium magnetizations, starting from linearized undamped Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equations. The formulas include Zeeman, exchange, demagnetizing, anisotropy, and exchange-stiffness terms and are presented as valid at all temperatures including near compensation. The authors test the formulas against time-resolved Faraday-rotation (in-plane) and Brillouin light scattering (out-of-plane) data on two Bi-substituted garnets, GdYb-BIG and Gd-BIG, using sublattice magnetizations from molecular-field theory, a reconstructed temperature-dependent anisotropy K(T), and two adjustable parameters lambda and A. They further show that far from T_M the expressions reduce to conventional FMR and exchange-resonance formulas and note the extension to gamma1 != gamma2.

Significance. The result, if fully supported, would be useful: it consolidates the two-mode resonance description of compensated ferrimagnets into practical analytic formulas that reduce to the known Kittel and Geschwind-Walker limits, and it demonstrates that one parameter set can describe both in-plane and out-of-plane modes when exchange stiffness is included. The paper's analytic consistency checks (convergence to conventional formulas and to the antiferromagnetic-resonance limit) are valuable, and the simultaneous reproduction of two independent measurement geometries with common lambda and A is a non-trivial success. The main reservation is that the comparison is not an independent test: K(T) is reconstructed from a divergent quantity with interpolation, and lambda and A are fit to the same experimental frequencies. Thus the significance is real but conditional on independent validation or a sensitivity analysis.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.1 and Figs. 2(b), 2(d), 4] The validation is not independent. K(T) is obtained by converting the coercivity-derived anisotropy field via H_FMR^u = 4K/(M1-M2) and interpolating through the divergence at T_M; the molecular-field parameters are chosen to match the same crystals' magnetization; and lambda and A in Table I are fit using Eqs. (5) and (6) to the very frequency-vs-temperature data shown in Fig. 4. Therefore the agreement of the solid curves with the points is an in-sample fit, not a prediction, and the abstract's 'successfully reproduce' overstates the test. The discrepancy below T_M for the LF mode of Gd-BIG in Fig. 4(c) is acknowledged but not quantitatively accounted for. Please provide independent K(T) data (torque or FMR on the same crystals), or at minimum a sensitivity analysis over K and over the uncertainties in lambda and A, with residuals and error bars on the fitted parameters.
  2. [Section 2, Eq. (5)] The key in-plane result is not verifiable from the manuscript. The text says a quartic secular equation is obtained and then gives Eq. (5), with all details in 'Supplemental Material 1', which is not included. The approximations needed to reduce the quartic to Eq. (5), and the handling of the equilibrium angles, are therefore not stated. Please include the secular equation and the reduction in the main text or in a self-contained appendix; the same applies to the equilibrium-angle calculation in Section 4.1 (Supplemental Material 2).
  3. [Section 3.1 and Section 5] The assumption K1 = K2 = K is acknowledged as a limitation, but its impact on the central claim is not quantified. The anisotropy terms appear with opposite signs for the two sublattices in Eqs. (5), (6), (10), and (11), so unequal sublattice anisotropies are not a priori negligible. The authors should estimate the error, for example by repeating the fit with published Fe- and RE-sublattice anisotropy values for these garnets or by showing that the predicted frequencies near T_M are insensitive to the difference.
  4. [Section 4.1 and Conclusion] The claim that Eqs. (5) and (6) are valid 'over all temperature ranges' should be delimited. The derivation assumes the collinear equilibrium of Eq. (4) with M1 and M2 along H0. The paper itself states that the magnetization tilts out of plane near T_M (no precession observed at 70-145 K for GdYb-BIG and 140-390 K for Gd-BIG) and that Eq. (4) is inapplicable there. The formulas may still be valid wherever the collinear state is the energy minimum, but this restriction should be stated explicitly in the abstract and conclusion.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3.1, first paragraph] 'bithmuth-doped' should be 'bismuth-doped'.
  2. [Section 3.1] The interpolation procedure used to obtain K(T) is not specified; please state the interpolating function (e.g., spline or polynomial) and show the raw H_FMR^u data points.
  3. [Sections 3.1 and 4.3] H_FMR^u is used both for the measured anisotropy field and for the effective field 2(K1+K2)/(M1-M2); distinct symbols would prevent confusion.
  4. [Section 4.2] 'the contribution of the BSM mode to the LF mode is large enough to reach 40 GHz' is ambiguous; the LF mode frequency reaches tens of GHz because of the large k, so the sentence should be rephrased as a frequency shift or mode frequency, not a 'contribution'.
  5. [Section 4.3, Eq. (12)] 'in the simplified case at TM' is imprecise; at the compensation temperature M1 = M2 by definition, so this is a limit taken at the compensation point, not a temperature interval. Rephrase accordingly.
  6. [Figure 4] The data points are shown without error bars or a statement of frequency uncertainty; at least a representative uncertainty is needed to judge the quality of the fit.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Agreement in Fig. 4 is partly an in-sample fit because λ and A are fitted with Eqs. (5)–(6) to the same data; the derivation itself is not circular.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.1 (parameter determination), Section 4.1 / Fig. 4 (agreement claim)]
    "The molecular field coefficient λ and exchange stiffness constants A are the fitting parameters determined from Eqs. (5) and (6). ... The calculated results show good agreement with the experimental data."

    The two free parameters of the model, λ and A, are determined by fitting the very equations being tested—Eqs. (5) and (6)—to the same measured resonance frequencies that are then displayed as 'good agreement' in Fig. 4. The agreement is therefore an in-sample calibration, not an independent prediction of the theory. The circularity is partial because the temperature dependence of the frequencies is still shaped by independently measured sublattice magnetizations M_i(T) and by the anisotropy K(T) inferred from coercivity, so the two fitted constants do not by themselves force the entire experimental curve.

full rationale

The derivation of Eqs. (5) and (6) from the coupled LLG equations and the free-energy density of Eq. (2) is self-contained: the secular equation follows from linearization about the assumed equilibrium, and the approximation limits in Section 4.3 are cross-checked against the conventional Kittel and Geschwind–Walker formulas, an internal consistency check rather than a circular argument. The circularity is in the validation step, not the algebra. Section 3.1 states that 'the molecular field coefficient λ and exchange stiffness constants A are the fitting parameters determined from Eqs. (5) and (6)', and Section 4.1 presents the resulting curves as 'good agreement with the experimental data'. Thus the agreement in Fig. 4 is partly an in-sample calibration: λ (which sets the exchange-resonance scale) and A (which controls the BLS wavenumber term) are chosen to match the same datasets that are then displayed as successful reproduction. This is not a full reduction by construction, because the temperature-dependent shape of the modes is still largely governed by independently measured M1(T), M2(T) and by K(T) inferred from coercivity data, and only two scalar parameters are fitted. The extraction of K(T) from H_FMR^u = 4K/(M1−M2) with interpolation across the divergence at T_M, and the acknowledged K1=K2 assumption, further weaken the independence of the validation but do not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs. No load-bearing self-citation or imported uniqueness theorem was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation relies on a phenomenological free energy density with several material parameters; the agreement with experiment is obtained by fitting lambda and A and by constructing K(T) via interpolation. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • molecular field coefficient lambda = 1550 G/(emu/cm3) for GdYb-BIG, 1700 G/(emu/cm3) for Gd-BIG
    Global parameter fitted using the derived resonance formulas Eqs. (5) and (6) to match the experimental frequency data; not independently measured in this paper.
  • exchange stiffness constant A = 5 erg/cm for both samples
    Global parameter fitted to the measured resonance frequencies via Eqs. (5) and (6), particularly to reproduce the BLS LF mode frequency.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption The system can be treated as a two-sublattice ferrimagnet with one RE sublattice and one effective Fe sublattice
    Fe-Fe coupling is orders of magnitude stronger than Fe-RE coupling and Yb magnetization is negligible above 50 K (Section 3.1).
  • domain assumption Sublattice gyromagnetic ratios are equal (gamma_RE = gamma_Fe) for the garnets above 50 K
    Section 3.1 states this, making T_M coincide with T_A for the samples.
  • domain assumption The free energy density Eq. (2) with uniaxial anisotropy, demagnetizing field, exchange interaction, and exchange stiffness is sufficient
    Section 2; the model ignores cubic anisotropy and other terms.
  • domain assumption Uniaxial anisotropy and exchange stiffness are equal for the two sublattices (K1=K2=K, A1=A2=A)
    Section 3.1; the authors state this assumption.
  • domain assumption The linear approximation of small oscillations around the equilibrium magnetization is valid
    Section 2; used to derive the secular equation.
  • ad hoc to paper The temperature dependence of K is obtained from the effective anisotropy field H_FMR^u = 4K/(M1-M2) with interpolation to remove the divergence at T_M
    Section 3.1 and Fig. 2; this interpolation is a modeling choice specific to this paper.
  • domain assumption The molecular field theory parameters for M_i(T) reproduce the measured saturation magnetization
    Section 3.1; M_i(T) is input into the resonance formulas.
  • domain assumption The wavenumber is negligible for pump-probe (k=0) and equal to the backscattering magnon wavenumber for BLS
    Sections 4.1 and 4.2.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Magnetic resonance frequency of two-sublattice ferrimagnet with magnetic compensation temperature." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QDO5XSMB

@misc{pith2026241114792,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Magnetic resonance frequency of two-sublattice ferrimagnet with magnetic compensation temperature},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QDO5XSMB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14792}
}
read the original abstract

Ferrimagnetic materials with a compensation temperature have recently attracted interest because of their unique combination of ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic properties. However, their magnetization dynamics near the compensation temperature are complex and cannot be fully explained by conventional ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) or exchange resonance modes. Therefore, practical models are necessary to capture these dynamics accurately. In this study, we derived the analytical solutions for the magnetic resonance frequencies of compensated ferrimagnets over all temperature ranges, considering both the in-plane and out-of-plane orientations of the magnetization. Our solutions successfully reproduce the experimental data obtained from time-resolved magneto-optical Faraday rotation and Brillouin light scattering measurements for the in-plane and out-of-plane cases, respectively. This reproduction is achieved by incorporating the exchange stiffness and temperature dependence of the magnetic anisotropy into the free energy density. Additionally, at temperatures sufficiently far from the compensation temperature, our analytical solutions converge with the conventional FMR and exchange resonance models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.14792 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (a) Two types of magnetic resonance modes in two-sublattice ferrimagnets: FMR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Temperature dependence of the sublattice magnetization for (a) GdYb-BIG (c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Time-resolved Faraday rotations at different temperatures: magnetization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Temperature dependence of magnetic resonance frequencies. GdYb-BIG: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    1–5 They are characterized by multiple magnetic sublattices with antiparallel orientations

    Introduction Ferrimagnetshavebeenextensivelystudiedinspintronicsbecauseoftheiruniqueproperties. 1–5 They are characterized by multiple magnetic sublattices with antiparallel orientations. Ow- ing to the unequal magnitudes of these sublattice magnetizations, ferrimagnets exhibit a net magnetization. This unique configuration gives rise to two magnetic reso...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Phenomenological Model In this section, we derive the analytical solutions of the magnetic resonance frequencies in a two-sublattice ferrimagnet from the LLG equations, which are written as dMi dt = −γiMi × Hi + αi Mi Mi × dMi dt , (1) where Mi (i = 1 , 2) denotes the sublattice magnetization (M1 > M2); Hi denotes the effective field experienced byMi; γi ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Sample properties We focus on two types of bithmuth-doped rare earth (RE) iron garnets with differentTM

    Sample and Methods 3.1. Sample properties We focus on two types of bithmuth-doped rare earth (RE) iron garnets with differentTM. The first is Gd3/2Yb1/2BiFe5O12 (GdYb-BIG) with Curie temperature Tc = 573 K and TM = 96 K.41,42 Samples with thicknesses of 140 µm and 390 µm were utilized for the pump-probe and BLS, respectively. The second is Gd1.8Tb0.2BiAl0...

    work page

  4. [4]

    In-plane orientation of magnetization First, we investigated the temperature dependence of the magnetic resonance frequency for the in-plane orientation

    Results and Discussion 4.1. In-plane orientation of magnetization First, we investigated the temperature dependence of the magnetic resonance frequency for the in-plane orientation. Figures 3(a) and 3(b) show the time-resolved magneto-optical Faraday rotation of the magnetization dynamics with the LF and HF modes, respectively, across various temperatures...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Conclusion This study aimed to obtain practical solutions for the resonance frequencies applicable across all temperature ranges including the compensation temperatures. We proposed a two-sublattice ferrimagnet model based on the LLG equation, utilizing the free energy den- sity that incorporates the Zeeman term, demagnetizing field term, exchange interac...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Ferrimagnetism

    W. P. Wolf, “Ferrimagnetism”, Rep. Prog. Phys.24, 212 (1961)

    work page 1961

  7. [7]

    Ultrafast spin dynamics and spintronics for ferrimagnets close to the spin compensation point (Review)

    B. A. Ivanov, “Ultrafast spin dynamics and spintronics for ferrimagnets close to the spin compensation point (Review)”, Low Temp. Phys.45, 935–963 (2019). 15

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Spintronics with compensated ferrimagnets

    J. Finley and L. Liu, “Spintronics with compensated ferrimagnets”, Appl. Phys. Lett.116, 110501 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    Ferrimagnetic spintronics

    S. K. Kim, G. S. D. Beach, K.-J. Lee, T. Ono, Th. Rasing, and H. Yang, “Ferrimagnetic spintronics”, Nat. Mater.21, 24–34 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    Ferrimagnets for spintronic devices: From materials to applications

    Y. Zhang, X. Feng, Z. Zheng, Z. Zhang, K. Lin, X. Sun, G. Wang, J. Wang, J. Wei, P. Vallobra, Y. He, Z. Wang, L. Chen, K. Zhang, Y. Xu, and W. Zhao, “Ferrimagnets for spintronic devices: From materials to applications”, Appl. Phys. Rev.10, 011301 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    Exchange Frequency Electron Spin Resonance in Ferrites

    J. Kaplan and C. Kittel, “Exchange Frequency Electron Spin Resonance in Ferrites”, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 760–761 (1953)

    1953

  4. [12]

    Exchange Resonances in Gadolinium Iron Garnet near the Magnetic Compensation Temperature

    S. Geschwind and L. R. Walker, “Exchange Resonances in Gadolinium Iron Garnet near the Magnetic Compensation Temperature”, J. Appl. Phys.30, S163–S170 (1959)

    1959

  5. [13]

    Far Infrared Spectra of Rare-Earth Iron Garnets

    A. J. Sievers and M. Tinkham, “Far Infrared Spectra of Rare-Earth Iron Garnets”, Phys. Rev. 129, 1995–2004 (1963)

    1963

  6. [14]

    Far-infrared spectra of dysprosium and terbium iron garnet

    J. Yamamoto, B. T. Smith, and E. E. Bell, “Far-infrared spectra of dysprosium and terbium iron garnet”, J. Opt. Soc. Am.64, 880–883 (1974)

    1974

  7. [15]

    Far-infrared spectra of the magnetic exchange resonances and optical phonons and their connection to magnetic and dielectric properties of Dy3Fe5O12 garnet

    T. D. Kang, E. C. Standard, P. D. Rogers, K. H. Ahn, A. A. Sirenko, A. Dubroka, C. Bern- hard, S. Park, Y. J. Choi, and S.-W. Cheong, “Far-infrared spectra of the magnetic exchange resonances and optical phonons and their connection to magnetic and dielectric properties of Dy3...

    2012

  8. [16]

    Ex- perimental observation of relativistic field-derivative torque in nonlinear THz response of mag- netization dynamics

    A. Dutta, C. Tzschaschel, D. Priyadarshi, K. Mikuni, T. Satoh, R. Mondal, and S. Pal, “Ex- perimental observation of relativistic field-derivative torque in nonlinear THz response of mag- netization dynamics”, arXiv: 2408.05510 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Brillouin-Mandelstam scattering from thermal and excited magnons

    A. S. Borovik-Romanov and N. M. Kreines, “Brillouin-Mandelstam scattering from thermal and excited magnons”, Phys. Rep.81, 351–408 (1982)

    1982

  10. [18]

    Optical determination of the exchange stiffness constant in an iron garnet

    K. Matsumoto, T. Brächer, P. Pirro, T. Fischer, D. Bozhko, M. Geilen, F. Heussner, T. Meyer, B. Hillebrands, and T. Satoh, “Optical determination of the exchange stiffness constant in an iron garnet”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.57, 070308 (2018)

    2018

  11. [19]

    Distinct handedness of spin wave across the compensation temperatures of ferrimagnets

    C. Kim, S. Lee, H.-G. Kim, J.-H. Park, K.-W. Moon, J. Y. Park, J. M. Yuk, K.-J. Lee, B.-G. Park, S. K. Kim, K.-J. Kim, and C. Hwang, “Distinct handedness of spin wave across the compensation temperatures of ferrimagnets”, Nat. Mater.19, 980–985 (2020). 16

    2020

  12. [20]

    Quanti- tative analysis of spin wave dynamics in ferrimagnets across compensation points

    E. Haltz, J. Sampaio, S. Krishnia, L. Berges, R. Weil, A. Mougin, and A. Thiaville, “Quanti- tative analysis of spin wave dynamics in ferrimagnets across compensation points”, Phys. Rev. B 105, 104414 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Ultrafast spin dynamics across compensation points in ferrimagnetic GdFeCo: The role of angular momentum compensation

    C. D. Stanciu, A. V. Kimel, F. Hansteen, A. Tsukamoto, A. Itoh, A. Kirilyuk, and Th. Rasing., “Ultrafast spin dynamics across compensation points in ferrimagnetic GdFeCo: The role of angular momentum compensation”, Phys. Rev. B73, 220402 (2006)

    2006

  14. [22]

    Optical Excitation of a Forbidden Magnetic Resonance Mode in a Doped Lutetium-Iron-Garnet Film via the Inverse Faraday Effect

    A. H. M. Reid, A. V. Kimel, A. Kirilyuk, J. F. Gregg, and Th. Rasing., “Optical Excitation of a Forbidden Magnetic Resonance Mode in a Doped Lutetium-Iron-Garnet Film via the Inverse Faraday Effect”, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 107402 (2010)

    2010

  15. [23]

    Non- thermal optical excitation of terahertz-spin precession in a magneto-optical insulator

    S. Parchenko, T. Satoh, I. Yoshimine, F. Stobiecki, A. Maziewski, and A. Stupakiewicz, “Non- thermal optical excitation of terahertz-spin precession in a magneto-optical insulator”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 032404 (2016)

    2016

  16. [24]

    Ultrafast Optomagnonics in Ferrimagnetic Multi-Sublattice Garnets

    A. Stupakiewicz and T. Satoh, “Ultrafast Optomagnonics in Ferrimagnetic Multi-Sublattice Garnets”, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.90, 081008 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    Sublattice-Selective InverseFaradayEffect inFerrimagnetic Rare-EarthIron Garnet

    T. Hiraoka, R. Kainuma, K. Matsumoto, K. T. Yamada, and T. Satoh, “Sublattice-Selective InverseFaradayEffect inFerrimagnetic Rare-EarthIron Garnet”, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.93, 023702 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Spin-Orbit-Torque Efficiency in Compensated Ferrimagnetic Cobalt- Terbium Alloys

    J. Finley and L. Liu, “Spin-Orbit-Torque Efficiency in Compensated Ferrimagnetic Cobalt- Terbium Alloys”, Phys. Rev. Appl.6, 054001 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    Anomalous Current- Induced Spin Torques in Ferrimagnets near Compensation

    R. Mishra, J. Yu, X. Qiu, M. Motapothula, T. Venkatesan, and H. Yang, “Anomalous Current- Induced Spin Torques in Ferrimagnets near Compensation”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 167201 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    Subpicosecond Magnetization Reversal across Ferrimagnetic Compensation Points

    C. D. Stanciu, A. Tsukamoto, A. V. Kimel, F. Hansteen, A. Kirilyuk, A. Itoh, and Th. Rasing., “Subpicosecond Magnetization Reversal across Ferrimagnetic Compensation Points”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 217204 (2007)

    2007

  21. [29]

    Transient ferromagnetic-like state mediating ultrafast reversal of antiferromagnetically coupled spins

    I. Radu, K. Vahaplar, C. Stamm, T. Kachel, N. Pontius, H. A. Dürr, T. A. Ostler, J. Barker, R. F. L. Evans, R. W. Chantrell, A. Tsukamoto, A. Itoh, A. Kirilyuk, Th. Rasing, and A. V. Kimel, “Transient ferromagnetic-like state mediating ultrafast reversal of antiferromagnetical...

    2011

  22. [30]

    Nanoscale spin reversal by non-local angular momentum transfer following ultrafast laser excitation in ferrimagnetic GdFeCo

    C. E. Graves, A. H. Reid, T. Wang, B. Wu, S. de Jong, K. Vahaplar, I. Radu, D. P. Bernstein, M. Messerschmidt, L. Müller, R. Coffee, M. Bionta, S. W. Epp, R. Hartmann, N. Kimmel, 17 G. Hauser, A. Hartmann, P. Holl, H. Gorke, J. H. Mentink, A. Tsukamoto, A. Fognini, J. J. Turne...

    2013

  23. [31]

    Engineered materials for all-optical helicity-dependent magnetic switching

    S. Mangin, M. Gottwald, C.-H. Lambert, D. Steil, V. Uhlíř, L. Pang, M. Hehn, S. Alebrand, M. Cinchetti, G. Malinowski, Y. Fainman, M. Aeschlimann, and E. E. Fullerton, “Engineered materials for all-optical helicity-dependent magnetic switching”, Nat. Mater. 13, 286–292 (2014)

    2014

  24. [32]

    Ultrafast Magnetism of a Ferrimagnet across the Spin-Flop Transition in High Magnetic Fields

    J. Becker, A. Tsukamoto, A. Kirilyuk, J. C. Maan, Th. Rasing, P. C. M. Christianen, and A. V. Kimel, “Ultrafast Magnetism of a Ferrimagnet across the Spin-Flop Transition in High Magnetic Fields”, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 117203 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    H-T phase diagram of rare-earth–transition-metal alloys in the vicinity of the compensation point

    M. D. Davydova, K. A. Zvezdin, J. Becker, A. V. Kimel, and A. K. Zvezdin, “H-T phase diagram of rare-earth–transition-metal alloys in the vicinity of the compensation point”, Phys. Rev. B 100, 064409 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    THz-Scale Field-Induced Spin Dynamics in Ferrimagnetic Iron Garnets

    T. G. H. Blank, K. A. Grishunin, E. A. Mashkovich, M. V. Logunov, A. K. Zvezdin, and A. V. Kimel, “THz-Scale Field-Induced Spin Dynamics in Ferrimagnetic Iron Garnets”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 037203 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    Unconventional spin dy- namics in the noncollinear phase of a ferrimagnet

    D. M. Krichevsky, N. A. Gusev, D. O. Ignatyeva, A. V. Prisyazhnyuk, E. Y. Semuk, S. N. Polulyakh, V. N. Berzhansky, A. K. Zvezdin, and V. I. Belotelov, “Unconventional spin dy- namics in the noncollinear phase of a ferrimagnet”, Phys. Rev. B108, 174442 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    Transient Non-Collinear Magnetic State for All-Optical Magnetization Switching

    S. Parchenko, A. Frej, H. Ueda, R. Carley, L. Mercadier, N. Gerasimova, G. Mercurio, J.Schlappa, A.Yaroslavtsev, N.Agarwal, R.Gort, A.Scherz, A.Zvezdin, A.Stupakiewicz, and U. Staub, “Transient Non-Collinear Magnetic State for All-Optical Magnetization Switching”, Adv. Sci. 10...

    2023

  29. [37]

    Theory of Ferromagnetic Resonance in Rare Earth Garnets. I. g Values

    C. Kittel, “Theory of Ferromagnetic Resonance in Rare Earth Garnets. I. g Values”, Phys. Rev. 115, 1587–1590 (1959)

    1959

  30. [38]

    Magnetization dynamics of the ferrimagnet CoGd near the compensation of magnetization and angular momentum

    M. Binder, A. Weber, O. Mosendz, G. Woltersdorf, M. Izquierdo, I. Neudecker, J. R. Dahn, T. D. Hatchard, J.-U. Thiele, C. H. Back, and M. R. Scheinfein, “Magnetization dynamics of the ferrimagnet CoGd near the compensation of magnetization and angular momentum”, Phys. Rev. B74...

    2006

  31. [39]

    Sublattice Effects in Magnetic Resonance

    R. K. Wangsness, “Sublattice Effects in Magnetic Resonance”, Phys. Rev. 91, 1085–1091 (1953)

    1953

  32. [40]

    Gilbert damping phenomenology for two-sublattice magnets

    A. Kamra, R. E. Troncoso, W. Belzig, and A. Brataas, “Gilbert damping phenomenology for two-sublattice magnets”, Phys. Rev. B98, 184402 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    Dynamics of domain walls in weak ferromagnets

    A. K. Zvezdin, “Dynamics of domain walls in weak ferromagnets”, JETP Lett.29, 553–556 (1979)

    1979

  34. [42]

    Ultrafast spin dynamics in ferrimagnets with compensation point

    M. D. Davydova, K. A. Zvezdin, A. V. Kimel, and A. K. Zvezdin, “Ultrafast spin dynamics in ferrimagnets with compensation point”, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter32, 01LT01 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    Temperature dependence of magnetic resonance in ferrimagnetic GdFeCo alloys

    T. Okuno, S. K. Kim, T. Moriyama, D.-H. Kim, H. Mizuno, T. Ikebuchi, Y. Hirata, H. Yoshikawa, A. Tsukamoto, K.-J. Kim, Y. Shiota, K.-J. Lee, and T. Ono, “Temperature dependence of magnetic resonance in ferrimagnetic GdFeCo alloys”, Appl. Phys. Express12, 093001 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    Enhancement of spin wave group velocity in ferrimagnets with angular momentum compensation

    S. Funada, Y. Shiota, M. Ishibashi, T. Moriyama, and T. Ono, “Enhancement of spin wave group velocity in ferrimagnets with angular momentum compensation”, Appl. Phys. Express 13, 063003 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Exchange stiffness of ferromagnets

    M. D. Kuz’min, K. P. Skokov, L. V. B. Diop, I. A. Radulov, and O. Gutfleisch, “Exchange stiffness of ferromagnets”, Eur. Phys. J. Plus135, 301 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    Directional control of spin-wave emission by spatially shaped light

    T. Satoh, Y. Terui, R. Moriya, B. A. Ivanov, K. Ando, E. Saitoh, T. Shimura, and K. Kuroda, “Directional control of spin-wave emission by spatially shaped light”, Nat. Photo.6, 662–666 (2012)

    2012

  39. [47]

    Mag- netization Reversal and Magnetic Domain Structures in Gd–Yb–BIG Crystals

    S. Parchenko, M. Tekielak, I. Yoshimine, T. Satoh, A. Maziewski, and A. Stupakiewicz, “Mag- netization Reversal and Magnetic Domain Structures in Gd–Yb–BIG Crystals”, IEEE Trans. Magn. 50, 6000904 (2014)

    2014

  40. [48]

    Temperature dependent magnetic properties of crystallo- graphically amorphous TbCo: An atomistic simulation study

    S. P. Prasad and J. R. Mohanty, “Temperature dependent magnetic properties of crystallo- graphically amorphous TbCo: An atomistic simulation study”, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.586, 171158 (2023)

    2023

  41. [49]

    Resonance Measurements in Magnetic Garnets

    G. P. Rodrigue, H. Meyer, and R. V. Jones, “Resonance Measurements in Magnetic Garnets”, J. Appl. Phys.31, S376–S382 (1960)

    1960

  42. [50]

    Ul- trafast non-thermal control of magnetization by instantaneous photomagnetic pulses

    A. V. Kimel, A. Kirilyuk, P. A. Usachev, R. V. Pisarev, A. M. Balbashov, and Th. Rasing, “Ul- trafast non-thermal control of magnetization by instantaneous photomagnetic pulses”, Nature 435, 655–657 (2005). 19

    2005

  43. [51]

    Wide frequencies range of spin excitations in a rare-earth Bi-doped iron garnet with a giant Faraday rotation

    S. Parchenko, A. Stupakiewicz, I. Yoshimine, T. Satoh, and A. Maziewski, “Wide frequencies range of spin excitations in a rare-earth Bi-doped iron garnet with a giant Faraday rotation”, Appl. Phys. Lett.103, 172402 (2013)

    2013

  44. [52]

    Gurevich and G

    A. Gurevich and G. Melkov,Magnetization Oscillations and Waves (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1996)

    1996

  45. [53]

    Magnons and acoustic phonons inY3−xBixFe5O12

    G. G. Siu, C. M. Lee, and Y. Liu, “Magnons and acoustic phonons inY3−xBixFe5O12”, Phys. Rev. B 64, 094421 (2001)

    2001

  46. [54]

    Brillouin scattering from bismuth substituted yttrium iron garnet single crystals

    Y. Liu, D. Mou, X. Li, and P. Zhang, “Brillouin scattering from bismuth substituted yttrium iron garnet single crystals”, IEEE Trans. Magn.23, 3329–3330 (1987)

    1987

  47. [55]

    Measurement of the refractive index and optical absorption spectra of epitaxial bismuth substituted yttrium iron garnet films at uv to near-ir wavelengths

    V. Doormann, J. P. Krumme, C. P. Klages, and M. Erman, “Measurement of the refractive index and optical absorption spectra of epitaxial bismuth substituted yttrium iron garnet films at uv to near-ir wavelengths”, Appl. Phys. A34, 223–230 (1984)

    1984

  48. [56]

    Lax and K

    B. Lax and K. J. Button,Microwave Ferrites and Ferrimagnetics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962)

    1962

  49. [57]

    On the Theory of Ferromagnetic Resonance Absorption

    C. Kittel, “On the Theory of Ferromagnetic Resonance Absorption”, Phys. Rev.73, 155–161 (1948)

    1948

  50. [58]

    Theory of Antiferromagnetic Resonance

    F. Keffer and C. Kittel, “Theory of Antiferromagnetic Resonance”, Phys. Rev.85, 329–337 (1952)

    1952

  51. [59]

    Molecular Field and Exchange Constants ofGd3+- Substituted Ferrimagnetic Garnets

    G. F. Dionne, “Molecular Field and Exchange Constants ofGd3+- Substituted Ferrimagnetic Garnets”, J. Appl. Phys.42, 2142–2143 (1971)

    1971

  52. [60]

    Fast domain wall motion in the vicinity of the angular momentum compensation temperature of ferrimagnets

    K.-J. Kim, S. K. Kim, Y. Hirata, S.-H. Oh, T. Tono, D.-H. Kim, T. Okuno, W. S. Ham, S. Kim, G. Go, Y. Tserkovnyak, A. Tsukamoto, T. Moriyama, K.-J. Lee, and T. Ono, “Fast domain wall motion in the vicinity of the angular momentum compensation temperature of ferrimagnets”, Nat....

    2017

  53. [61]

    Fast current-driven domain walls and small skyrmions in a compensated ferrimagnet

    L. Caretta, M. Mann, F. Büttner, K. Ueda, B. Pfau, C. M. Günther, P. Hessing, A. Churikova, C. Klose, M. Schneider, D. Engel, C. Marcus, D. Bono, K. Bagschik, S. Eisebitt, and G. S. D. Beach, “Fast current-driven domain walls and small skyrmions in a compensated ferrimagnet”, ...

    2018

  54. [62]

    Self-focusing skyrmion racetracks in ferrimagnets

    S. K. Kim, K.-J. Lee, and Y. Tserkovnyak, “Self-focusing skyrmion racetracks in ferrimagnets”, Phys. Rev. B95, 140404 (2017). 20

    2017

  55. [63]

    Vanishing skyrmion Hall effect at the angular momentum compensation temperature of a ferrimagnet

    Y. Hirata, D.-H. Kim, S. K. Kim, D.-K. Lee, S.-H. Oh, D.-Y. Kim, T. Nishimura, T. Okuno, Y. Futakawa, H. Yoshikawa, A. Tsukamoto, Y. Tserkovnyak, Y. Shiota, T. Moriyama, S.-B. Choe, K.-J. Lee, and T. Ono, “Vanishing skyrmion Hall effect at the angular momentum compensation tem...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.