Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 56 references

Coexistence of gapless and gapped vortex modes with Majorana corner states in a 2D second-order topological superconductor

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A 2D second-order topological superconductor can host zero-energy vortex-localized modes together with Majorana corner modes, provided the normal-state bulk spectrum has Dirac cones.

desk verdict A useful analytic step on vortex zero modes in 2D HOTSC, but the justification that the (k_x^2 - k_y^2) kinetic term leaves them gapless is weaker than the text suggests. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14831 v2 pith:WECT65NZ submitted 2024-11-22 cond-mat.supr-con

classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords second-ordertopologicalsuperconductorMajoranacornermodesvortexzeroDiracconesspin-orbitcouplinginsulator-superconductorinterfacehigher-ordertopologysuperconducting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Second-order topological superconductors are expected to have gapped edge spectra, so vortex-bound states would be expected to acquire finite energy. This paper shows that in a two-dimensional second-order topological superconductor built from a normal layer with spin-orbit coupling and a superconducting layer, zero-energy vortex-localized modes can coexist with the Majorana corner modes that define the higher-order phase. The requirement is that the non-superconducting bulk spectrum be gapless and contain Dirac cones; the number of pairs of vortex zero modes equals the number of Dirac cones, and an explicit wavefunction is derived for them. If the normal-state spectrum is gapped, the vortex modes are gapped while corner Majoranas survive. The result matters because it gives concrete lattice-parameter conditions under which a single material could show both corner Majoranas and zero-bias vortex peaks in scanning tunneling experiments.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a continuum expansion around the Dirac points of the normal-state spectrum, combined with the standard zero-mode construction for vortices in topological systems. The key object is the zero-energy vortex wavefunction of Eq. (12), built from Bessel functions and the radial envelope $F(r)$, which solves the vortex equations when the chemical potential is finite. The argument hinges on the separation of the kinetic terms in Eq. (13): the combination $(\partial_x^2 - \partial_y^2)$ has zero overlap with the zero mode because of its angular dependence, whereas $(\partial_x^2 + \partial_y^2)$ would produce a finite gap. Vanishing of both the constant term and the $(\partial_x^2 + \partial_y^2)$ term in the expansion yields the coexistence condition Eq. (14). A second central mechanism is the absence of a boundary-localized zero-mode counterpart: in a first-order topological superconductor the increasing solution of the vortex equations corresponds to an edge Majorana, but in a second-order superconductor the edge spectrum is gapped, so only the vortex-localized solution survives.

What would settle it

Compute the exact lattice spectrum of the model with a vortex at the parameters satisfying Eq. (14) for a sequence of increasing system sizes and extract the lowest vortex-bound eigenvalue; if that energy approaches a nonzero saturation value rather than decaying to zero, the continuum zero mode is not exact. A complementary check is to include the next-order momentum terms omitted from Eq. (13) and test whether the vortex-mode energy becomes nonzero.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that zero-energy vortex modes are not forbidden in a second-order topological superconductor; they appear precisely when the normal (non-superconducting) layer has Dirac cones in its bulk spectrum. Working in a two-orbital square-lattice model with spin-orbit coupling and spin-singlet pairing, the authors expand the Hamiltonian near the spin-orbit nodal points and solve the superconducting vortex equations. The resulting zero-energy solution, Eq. (12), is a combination of Bessel functions $J_0(r\mu/2\lambda)$ and $J_1(r\mu/2\lambda)$ times a radial envelope $F(r)=\exp\left(-\int_0^r \Delta(\rho)/2|\lambda|\,d\rho\right)$, with only one spin projection selected by the vortex winding. The gapless modes survive when the kinetic parameters satisfy $t_1 = c_x \,\delta t\, \operatorname{sign} t_y / 2$ and $\Delta\varepsilon = -2c_x \,\delta t\, \operatorname{sign} t_x$, where $c_x = \pm 1$ labels the Dirac point and $\delta t = (|t_x| - |t_y|)/2$; then the number of zero-mode pairs equals the number of Dirac cones. When this condition is violated and the normal spectrum is gapped, the vortex modes acquire a gap while the Majorana corner modes remain, so the coexistence is controlled by lattice parameters rather than by topology alone.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that lattice-scale corrections to the kinetic energy, beyond the terms kept in the continuum expansion, do not shift the zero-energy vortex mode; the paper verifies this for one combination of second derivatives, showing it has zero overlap with the wavefunction, but does not prove the full kinetic operator exactly kills the state, so neglected higher-order terms could open a small gap.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In a sample in the second-order topological superconducting phase with $t_1 = c_x \,\delta t\, \operatorname{sign} t_y / 2$ and $\Delta\varepsilon = -2c_x \,\delta t\, \operatorname{sign} t_x$, scanning tunneling spectroscopy should simultaneously show zero-bias conductance peaks at vortex cores and at corners.
  • The number of zero-energy vortex pairs is fixed by the number of Dirac cones in the normal-state spectrum: one pair for a single cone and two pairs for two cones, so the vortex-mode degeneracy directly probes the normal-state band structure.
  • When the normal spectrum is gapped, the same model produces only gapped vortex modes while Majorana corner modes persist, so the absence of a zero-bias vortex peak does not exclude a second-order topological superconducting phase.
  • The vortex zero modes are not protected by a topological invariant, so approaching a boundary or corner hybridizes them with edge and corner states; near a corner one pair becomes corner-localized and may remain gapless or acquire a small gap depending on $\Delta_0$ and other parameters.
  • The coexistence condition is a precise relation among hopping parameters and on-site energies, so it can be tuned by lattice deformations or gate potentials to switch between gapped and gapless vortex modes without destroying the corner Majoranas.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the zero mode is not topologically protected, real materials will generically have small corrections that split it from zero; the practical prediction is a narrow but not exactly pinned zero-bias peak whose residual energy is set by the deviation from Eq. (14).
  • The Dirac-cone-to-vortex-mode counting may extend beyond this two-orbital lattice: any normal state with several symmetry-related Dirac points should contribute one vortex-mode pair per cone, provided the same kind of kinetic cancellation can be arranged.
  • The condition Eq. (14) can be read as a design rule: strain that changes $|t_x| - |t_y|$ or gates that shift $\Delta\varepsilon$ provide a knob to turn vortex zero modes on and off while leaving corner Majoranas intact, which could be used to manipulate the low-energy state content of a device.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a two-orbital lattice model of a two-dimensional second-order topological superconductor with Rashba spin-orbit coupling and singlet pairing. It derives an approximate continuum solution for zero-energy vortex-localized modes when the normal-state bulk spectrum has Dirac cones, giving the explicit wavefunction in Eq. (12) and the parameter condition (14) for gapless vortex modes. It reports numerical spectra showing that these zero modes can coexist with Majorana corner modes when the superconducting bulk and Wannier gaps are open, and it analyzes how the modes hybridize when the vortex approaches an edge or a corner.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper provides a useful and nontrivial extension of vortex zero-mode physics to higher-order topological superconductors: unlike first-order systems, the edge spectrum is gapped, yet zero-energy vortex modes can still appear and coexist with corner Majoranas, with the number of pairs set by the number of Dirac cones. The analytic construction is self-contained, the parameter condition (14) is explicit, and the finite-size numerics in Figs. 2 and 3 support the coexistence scenario. The main caveat is the treatment of the quadratic kinetic term, which is the subject of the major comments.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sec. IV, Eq. (13) and Appendix B] The statement that the quadratic term t cx sign tx in Eq. (13) 'does not influence' the zero-energy solution (12) is not established. Appendix B proves only that the diagonal matrix element Psi^dag (d_x^2 - d_y^2) Psi vanishes for state (12); it does not show that the operator annihilates Psi or that all off-diagonal matrix elements to other states vanish. Acting on (12) with the operator in Eq. (B1) generates components with cos 2phi and sin 2phi angular factors that are not proportional to the original state, so the state is not an eigenstate when this term is retained. Generically this produces a second-order energy shift, so the vortex mode is zero only to leading order in the continuum expansion. Consequently, condition (14), which cancels only the other terms in Eq. (13), may not be sufficient to guarantee truly gapless vortex modes in the full lattice model. The numerical demonstrations at specific parameter points are consistent with the claim, but they do not establish Eq. (14) as an exact condition. I request a proof of the vanishing of the off-diagonal couplings, an estimate of the residual gap, or a concrete finite-size scaling study showing that the lowest positive eigenvalue tends to zero at the parameters of Fig. 2.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (4)] The notation for the vortex phase uses arg[z((R_f+R_m)/2) - z(R_v)] for bond-centered pairings; please clarify the convention for the bond midpoint and the branch of arg.
  2. [Abstract and throughout] The term 'gapless vortex modes' is potentially confusing because the modes are localized and do not form a band; 'zero-energy vortex modes' would be more precise throughout.
  3. [Figs. 2 and 3] The system size N is never stated; please give the lattice size and the numerical tolerance used to identify zero-energy states.
  4. [Appendix A, Eq. (A1)] The phase theta introduced in Eq. (A1) is not defined before it is used; please specify its relation to the sign choices in beta.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the vortex-mode derivation is self-contained and the only self-citations are non-load-bearing.

full rationale

I found no circular step in the derivation. The zero-energy vortex solution (12) is obtained by solving the continuum Bogoliubov–de Gennes equations with the standard Jackiw–Rossi procedure (Refs. [17,19,20,38–41]); it is not defined in terms of the coexistence it is used to demonstrate. The coexistence condition (14) is derived analytically by requiring the constant term ε~ and the radial quadratic term in the expanded tk (Eq. (13)) to vanish; it is a constraint on the lattice parameters, not a fitted output, and the numerical spectra in Figs. 2 and 3 are independent checks. The HOTSC phase is supported by the in-paper Wannier-band polarization and quadrupole calculation and by the external model of Ref. [34]; the self-citations [35,36] are used only as supplementary support and are not load-bearing for the vortex-mode derivation. Appendix B's assertion that (∂x^2−∂y^2) has no effect because Ψ†(∂x^2−∂y^2)Ψ=0 is a possible weakness in the analytic argument, but it is a correctness and rigor concern rather than circularity: the paper does not define the vortex-mode energy as that matrix element. Thus no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data; all model parameters are physical inputs, and the coexistence condition (14) is analytically derived. The main axioms are the continuum linearization near Dirac points, the angular-momentum suppression of the quadratic kinetic term, the bulk topological invariants establishing the HOTSC phase, and the Jackiw-Rossi vortex-Dirac correspondence.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The linearized continuum approximation around the spin-orbit nodal points captures the zero-energy vortex physics (Sec. III, Eqs. (5)-(8)).
    The derivation neglects quadratic and higher-order terms in the lattice dispersion near the Dirac points; this is standard but unquantified.
  • domain assumption The quadratic kinetic term proportional to (k_x^2 - k_y^2) does not couple to the zero-energy vortex solution (12); its matrix element vanishes by angular momentum conservation (Appendix B).
    Appendix B shows the expectation value vanishes for the specific angular structure, but does not show the operator annihilates the state; higher-order corrections are neglected.
  • standard math The model supports Majorana corner modes protected by time-reversal symmetry when sign(ΔxΔy) = - sign(tx ty) even at t1 = Δε = 0, established via Wannier band polarization and quadrupole moment (Sec. II).
    Uses bulk topological invariants from Refs. [8,37]; the authors calculate these for one parameter point.
  • standard math Jackiw-Rossi correspondence: a vortex in a Dirac fermion system binds zero modes, one per Dirac cone, under suitable winding (Sec. III, Ref. [41]).
    The analytical solution (12) relies on this established result extended to a two-band model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Coexistence of gapless and gapped vortex modes with Majorana corner states in a 2D second-order topological superconductor." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WECT65NZ

@misc{pith2026241114831,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Coexistence of gapless and gapped vortex modes with Majorana corner states in a 2D second-order topological superconductor},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WECT65NZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14831}
}
read the original abstract

Although the appearance of vortex-localized states with zero energy in first-order topological superconductors is well known, their possibility to form in the higher-order topological phase of 2D systems has not been completely uncovered yet. Here we demonstrate the coexistence of zero-energy vortex modes and Majorana corner modes in the model of a 2D second-order topological superconductor. The model describes an interface between a normal layer supporting the topological insulating phase and a superconducting layer, for which different symmetries of the spin-singlet superconducting order parameter are considered. We show that the gapless vortex modes can appear under certain conditions in the superconducting state with a vortex if the bulk energy spectrum of the normal (non-superconducting) state is gapless and has Dirac cones. The number of pairs of such vortex modes corresponds to the number of Dirac cones. It is essential that if the normal bulk spectrum becomes gapped and the system is in the state of a topological insulator, then the zero-energy vortex modes can not be realized, while Majorana corner modes hold in the superconducting state. The interaction of the vortex modes with the edge and topological corner modes is studied when the vortex appears near the boundaries.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.14831 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The topological phase diagram in variables chemical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. a) The energy spectrum of the square-shaped system at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Dependence of excitation energy of the square-shape [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    can be classified by spin projection number σ and may be written in the form α σ = ∑ f [ uf σ cf Aσ + vf σ cf Bσ + wf σ c† f A σ + zf σ c† f Bσ ] . (2) The bulk spectrum of the system in superconducting and nonsuperconducting regime is defined as εsc = √ (εnosc ± µ )2 + |∆ k|2, (3) εnosc = √ t2 k + |λ k|2, tk = ∆ ε + 2tx cos kx + 2ty cos ky + 4t1 cos kx cos...

  2. [2]

    Therefore, there is a pair of Majorana corner modes (Majorana Kramers pair) protected by TRS at each cor- ner [34]

    supports time-reversal symme- try. Therefore, there is a pair of Majorana corner modes (Majorana Kramers pair) protected by TRS at each cor- ner [34]. In the case of t1 = ∆ ε = 0 (as it will be discussed in the next section, zero-energy vortex modes can exist in such case) the procedure of defining the effective mass of edge states, carried out previously, ...

  3. [3]

    and edge su- perconducting spectrum remain gapped at t1 = ∆ ε = 0 (see [35, 36]). To prove the presence of HOTSC phase in this case one can calculate the polarization of the Wan- nier bands and the quadrupole (the details of the pro- cedure can be found in [37] and supplementary materi- als of [8]), which are the bulk topological indexes and cannot be cha...

  4. [4]

    in the absence of superconducting coupling with gap closure at the pair of high-symmetry points: (0 , 0), ( π, π ) or (0 , π ), ( π, 0) for τ = sign(txty) = ∓1 correspondingly, which are the nodal points of the spin-orbit interaction. To obtain the solution for zero-energy vortex modes at the chosen parameters we use the wide-known procedure [17, 19, 20, ...

  5. [5]

    (6) with cx = cos k(N ) x = ±1 referring to different nodal points

    in the vicinity of the spin- orbit interaction nodal points tk ≈ t sign(tx)cx(k2 y − k2 x) (5) λ kσ ≈ −2λc x(τ ky + iσk x), ∆ k ≈ ∆ 0 + 2cx(∆ x − ∆ yτ). (6) with cx = cos k(N ) x = ±1 referring to different nodal points. Obviously, that τ = −cxcy with cy = cos k(N ) y . As the spectrum is linear in quasi-momentum k around the nodal points we as a first step...

  6. [6]

    As it can be easily checked, these equations separate at µ = 0 into two pairs, which are equivalent up to conjuga- tion along with replacement σ → σ

    take the form     −µ λ rσ σ ∆ ∗ rφ 0 −λ ∗ rσ −µ 0 −σ ∆ ∗ rφ σ ∆ rφ 0 µ λ rσ 0 −σ ∆ rφ −λ ∗ rσ µ        uσ v σ wσ zσ    = 0, λ rσ = 2λσc x exp(−iστ φ) ( ∂r − iστ r ∂φ ) , (8) ∆ rφ = χ ∆( r) exp(ilφ ). As it can be easily checked, these equations separate at µ = 0 into two pairs, which are equivalent up to conjuga- tion along with replacement ...

  7. [7]

    G. E. Volovik, Topological superfluid 3 he-b in magnetic field and ising variable, JETP Letters 91, 201 (2010)

  8. [8]

    T. E. Pahomi, M. Sigrist, and A. A. Soluyanov, Braiding majorana corner modes in a second-order topological superconductor, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 032068(R) (2020)

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    in our case. This solution has the form [ uσ zσ ] = 1√ N [ 1 s ] F (r), σ = −τ l, (10) F (r) = exp  − r∫ 0 dρ ∆( ρ) 2|λ|   , s = cxχ sign λ, accompanied with a pair of their hermitian conjugated counterparts (solutions for wσ and vσ ). It is seen that the double-pair zero-...

  2. [10]

    It can be concluded that there are zero- energy vortex modes only with one spin projection σ de- fined by the vortex vorticity sign l

    with a factor f (r) for uσ , zσ and the second solution (11) with a factor g(r) for vσ , wσ (see Appendix A for details) one can obtain the final form    uσ v σ wσ zσ    = 1 √ N    J0 (rµ/ 2λ) J1 (rµ/ 2λ) exp(−ilφ ) sJ1 (rµ/ 2λ) exp(ilφ ) sJ0 (rµ/ 2λ)    F (r), (12)...

  3. [11]

    Obtained zero-energy vortex modes are not protected by any topological number

    is gap- less. Obtained zero-energy vortex modes are not protected by any topological number. Despite that, according to (

  4. [12]

    This result is also confirmed by the numerical calcula- tions

    their existence at ∆ ε = t1 = 0, |tx| = |ty| is insensi- tive to the precise values of the spin-orbit interaction λ, chemical potential µ , and superconducting coupling pa- rameters ∆ 0/x/y (apart from the case ∆( k(N ) x , k (N ) y ) = 0). This result is also confirmed by the ...

  5. [13]

    The first term ~ε in tk (13) opens a gap in the spectrum εnosc at a nodal point and gaps out the vortex modes (12)

    with unrestricted parameters tx, ty, ∆ ε, and t1, and make the expansion up to quadratic terms in kx,y tk ≈~ε − tcx sign tx(k2 x − k2 y) − (13) − sign tx(cxδt − 2t1 sign ty)(k2 x + k2 y), ~ε = ∆ ε + 2 sign tx(2cxδt − 2t1 sign(ty)), t = (|tx| + |ty|)/ 2, δt = (|tx| − |ty|)/ 2. ...

  6. [14]

    due to its specific dependence on φ, justifying neglecting this term previously in Eqs ( 8) (see Appendix B). 5 FIG. 2. a) The energy spectrum of the square-shaped system at ∆ ε = t1 = 0, tx = − ty = 2, ∆ x = ∆ y = 0 . 5, λ = 1 . 5, µ = 0 . 5, ∆ 0 = 0 (green point in Fig. 1) wi...

  7. [15]

    This leads to the condition t1 = cxδt sign ty/ 2, (14) ∆ ε = −2cxδt sign tx

    are zero corresponding to the existence of Dirac cones in the non-superconducting bulk spectrum and the absence of the additive to the vortex modes energy from the kinetic term. This leads to the condition t1 = cxδt sign ty/ 2, (14) ∆ ε = −2cxδt sign tx. It is seen that for |t...

  8. [16]

    1, while the vortex zero modes still exist)

    is gapless and corner, as well as vortex excitations are mixed with the bulk ones (this interval of µ is mainly determined by the spin-orbit coupling pa- rameter λ); 2) we can increase superconducting coupling constant ∆ 0 from zero value or change the ratio ∆ x/ ∆ y starting ...

  9. [17]

    Therefore, only single-pair vortex modes with zero energy can ex- ist at |tx| ⁄= |ty|

    the bulk non-superconducting energy spectrum εnosc in ( 3) is gapless only at one nodal point, while the gap at the second nodal point remains finite. Therefore, only single-pair vortex modes with zero energy can ex- ist at |tx| ⁄= |ty|. The energy spectrum for this case is pre...

  10. [18]

    W. A. Benalcazar, B. A. Bernevig, and T. L. Hughes, Quantized electric multipole insulators, Science 357, 61 (2017)

  11. [19]

    Langbehn, Y

    J. Langbehn, Y. Peng, L. Trifunovic, F. von Oppen, and P. W. Brouwer, Reflection-symmetric second-order topological insulators and superconductors , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 246401 (2017)

  12. [20]

    Zhu, Tunable majorana corner states in a two-dimensional second-order topological superconductor induced by magnetic fields, Phys

    X. Zhu, Tunable majorana corner states in a two-dimensional second-order topological superconductor induced by magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B 97, 205134 (2018)

  13. [21]

    T. Liu, J. J. He, and F. Nori, Majorana cor- ner states in a two-dimensional magnetic topologi- cal insulator on a high-temperature superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 98, 245413 (2018)

  14. [22]

    Y. Wang, M. Lin, and T. L. Hughes, Weak- pairing higher order topological superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 98, 165144 (2018)

  15. [23]

    Z. Yan, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Majorana cor- ner modes in a high-temperature platform, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 096803 (2018)

  16. [24]

    S. B. Zhang, W. B. Rui, A. Calzona, S. J. Choi, A. P. Schnyder, and B. Trauzettel, Topological and holonomic quantum computation based on second-order topological superconductors, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 043025 (2020)

  17. [25]

    S. B. Zhang, A. Calzona, and B. Trauzettel, All- electrically tunable networks of majorana bound states, Phys. Rev. B 102, 100503(R) (2020)

  18. [26]

    D. A. Ivanov, Non-abelian statistics of half- quantum vortices in p-wave superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 268 (2001)

  19. [27]

    Alicea, Y

    J. Alicea, Y. Oreg, G. Refael, F. von Oppen, and M. P. A. Fisher, Non-abelian statistics and topological quantum information processing in 1d wire networks, Nature Physics 7, 412 (2011)

  20. [28]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. DasSarma, Non-abelian anyons and topological quan- tum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083 (2008)

  21. [29]

    Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of Majorana fermions in solid state systems, Rep

    J. Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of Majorana fermions in solid state systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 076501 (2012)

  22. [30]

    Stern, F

    A. Stern, F. von Oppen, and E. Mariani, Geo- metric phases and quantum entanglement as build- ing blocks for non-Abelian quasiparticle statistics, Phys. Rev. B 70, 205338 (2004)

  23. [31]

    Gurarie and L

    V. Gurarie and L. Radzihovsky, Zero modes of two-dimensional chiral p-wave superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 75, 212509 (2007)

  24. [32]

    J. D. Sau, R. M. Lutchyn, S. Tewari, and S. Das Sarma, Generic New Platform for Topological Quantum Computation Using Semiconductor Heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 040502 (2010)

  25. [33]

    Bj¨ ornson and A

    K. Bj¨ ornson and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Vortex states and Majorana fermions in spin-orbit coupled semiconductor-superconductor hybrid structures, Phys. Rev. B 88, 024501 (2013)

  26. [34]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Superconducting Proximity Effect and Majorana Fermions at the Surface of a Topological Insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 096407 (2008)

  27. [35]

    A. L. Rakhmanov, A. V. Rozhkov, and F. Nori, Majorana fermions in pinned vortices, Phys. Rev. B 84, 075141 (2011)

  28. [36]

    C.-K. Chiu, M. J. Gilbert, and T. L. Hughes, Vortex lines in topological insulator-superconductor heterostructur es, Phys. Rev. B 84, 144507 (2011)

  29. [37]

    Hosur, P

    P. Hosur, P. Ghaemi, R. S. K. Mong, and A. Vish- wanath, Majorana Modes at the Ends of Super- conductor Vortices in Doped Topological Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 097001 (2011)

  30. [38]

    A. O. Zlotnikov, Majorana vortex modes in spin- singlet chiral superconductors with noncollinear spin ordering: Local density of states study, Phys. Rev. B 107, 144513 (2023)

  31. [39]

    R. S. Akzyanov, A. L. Rakhmanov, A. V. Rozhkov, and F. Nori, Tunable Majorana fermion from Lan- dau quantization in 2D topological superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 94, 125428 (2016)

  32. [40]

    Kheirkhah, Z

    M. Kheirkhah, Z. Yan, and F. Marsiglio, Vortex-line topology in iron-based superconduc- tors with and without second-order topology, Phys. Rev. B 103, L140502 (2021)

  33. [41]

    Zhang, Z

    Z. Zhang, Z. Wu, C. Fang, F.-c. Zhang, J. Hu, Y. Wang, and S. Qin, Topological superconductivity from uncon- ventional band degeneracy with conventional pairing, Nature Communications 15, 7971 (2024)

  34. [42]

    Zhang, Bulk-Vortex Correspondence of Higher- Order Topological Superconductors, arXiv:2208.01652 [cond-mat] 10.48550/arXiv.2208.01652 (2022)

    R.-X. Zhang, Bulk-Vortex Correspondence of Higher- Order Topological Superconductors, arXiv:2208.01652 [cond-mat] 10.48550/arXiv.2208.01652 (2022)

  35. [43]

    Zhang, W

    R.-X. Zhang, W. S. Cole, and S. Das Sarma, Helical Hinge Majorana Modes in Iron-Based Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 187001 (2019)

  36. [44]

    Zhang and S

    R.-X. Zhang and S. Das Sarma, Intrinsic Time- Reversal-Invariant Topological Superconductiv- ity in Thin Films of Iron-Based Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 137001 (2021)

  37. [45]

    D. Wang, L. Kong, P. Fan, H. Chen, S. Zhu, W. Liu, L. Cao, Y. Sun, S. Du, J. Schneeloch, R. Zhong, G. Gu, L. Fu, H. Ding, and H.-J. Gao, Evidence for Majo- rana bound states in an iron-based superconductor, Science 362, 333 (2018)

  38. [46]

    Pathak, S

    V. Pathak, S. Plugge, and M. Franz, Majorana bound states in vortex lattices on iron-based superconductors, Annals of Physics , 168431 (2021)

  39. [47]

    Machida and T

    T. Machida and T. Hanaguri, Searching for Majorana quasiparticles at vortex cores in iron-based superconduc- tors, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. , ptad084 (2023)

  40. [48]

    M. J. Gray, J. Freudenstein, S. Y. F. Zhao, R. O’Connor, S. Jenkins, N. Kumar, M. Hoek, A. Kopec, S. Huh, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, R. Zhong, C. Kim, G. D. Gu, and K. S. Burch, Evidence for Helical Hinge Zero Modes in an Fe-Based Superconductor, Nano Lett. 19, 4890 (2019)

  41. [49]

    Wang, C.-C

    Q. Wang, C.-C. Liu, Y.-M. Lu, and F. Zhang, High-temperature majorana corner states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 186801 (2018) . 9

  42. [50]

    S. V. Aksenov, A. D. Fedoseev, M. S. Shustin, and A. O. Zlotnikov, Effect of local coulomb interaction on majo- rana corner modes: Weak and strong correlation limits, Phys. Rev. B 107, 125401 (2023)

  43. [51]

    S. V. Aksenov, A. D. Fedoseev, M. S. Shustin, and A. O. Zlotnikov, On the dirac mass of hubbard fermions in strongly correlated higher-order topological supercon - ductor, Physics of the Solid State 65, 1063 (2023)

  44. [52]

    W. A. Benalcazar, B. A. Bernevig, and T. L. Hughes, Electric multipole moments, topological multipole mo- ment pumping, and chiral hinge states in crystalline in- sulators, Phys. Rev. B 96, 245115 (2017)

  45. [53]

    Fukui, Majorana zero modes bound to a vortex line in a topological superconductor, Phys

    T. Fukui, Majorana zero modes bound to a vortex line in a topological superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 81, 214516 (2010)

  46. [54]

    R. S. Akzyanov, A. V. Rozhkov, A. L. Rakhmanov, and F. Nori, Tunneling spectrum of a pinned vortex with a robust Majorana state, Phys. Rev. B 89, 085409 (2014)

  47. [55]

    Kobayashi and A

    S. Kobayashi and A. Furusaki, Double majorana vortex zero modes in superconducting topological crystalline insulators with surface rotation anomaly, Phys. Rev. B 102, 180505(R) (2020)

  48. [56]

    Jackiw and P

    R. Jackiw and P. Rossi, Zero modes of the vortex-fermion system, Nuclear Physics B 190, 681 (1981)

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.