Manipulating spectral transitions and photonic transmission in a non-Hermitian optical system through nanoparticle perturbations

Bo-Wang Zhang; Cheng Shang; J. Y. Sun; X. X. Yi; Zhuo-Cheng Gu

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 78 references

Manipulating spectral transitions and photonic transmission in a non-Hermitian optical system through nanoparticle perturbations

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that two precisely tuned nanoparticles on a spinning resonator can convert its dissipative anti-PT-symmetric spectrum into a Hermitian 'quasi-closed' one, giving coherent Rabi exchange between clockwise and…

desk verdict A promising two-nanoparticle control idea undercut by an unsupported step: Eq. (12) leaves a +iγ' diagonal term, so the claimed Hermitian transition doesn't hold. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14862 v2 pith:K7EHWTAJ submitted 2024-11-22 physics.optics quant-ph

Bo-Wang Zhang , Cheng Shang , J. Y. Sun , Zhuo-Cheng Gu , X. X. Yi This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.opticsquant-ph

keywords anti-PTsymmetrynon-HermitianopticsspinningmicroresonatornanoparticleperturbationspectraltransitionRabioscillationphotontransmissionquasi-closedsystem

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a spinning optical resonator with two attached nanoparticles can be tuned to sit exactly on a boundary where its non-Hermitian, anti-PT-symmetric spectrum becomes the real spectrum of an energy-conserving 'quasi-closed' system. The tuning is a triple condition on the imaginary parts of the two nanoparticle perturbations and on their angular separation, which cancels the imaginary part of the off-diagonal backscattering and leaves a real symmetric coupling between the clockwise and counterclockwise modes. With that matrix, a single photon placed in one direction oscillates coherently into the other, with an exchange frequency set by the rotation-induced Sagnac shift and by the nanoparticle perturbation strength. The paper derives explicit time-dependent probabilities and shows that rotation speed and perturbation strength can switch between full photon swaps and nearly frozen distributions. A sympathetic reader would take the central contribution to be a parameter recipe for converting an open dissipative photon system into an effectively closed two-level one.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the perturbation condition Eq. (12), a triple tuning of the two nanoparticles' complex perturbation strengths $\xi_1,\xi_2$ and their angular separation $\vartheta$. With $\vartheta=(2\ell+1)\pi/(2m)$, the two particles contribute off-diagonal couplings with opposite phases, so the Hermitian and anti-Hermitian parts of the backscattering combine in a fixed way; the imaginary-part conditions then make the off-diagonal element of $\hat{H}'$ purely real and leave the diagonal imaginary parts as a common term $+i\gamma'$. The further step that carries the argument is the paper's assertion that, at stable dynamic flow equilibrium, energy is conserved and the dynamics are controlled by $\mathrm{Re}(\hat{H}')$; this is what converts the explicitly non-Hermitian matrix (5) into the Hermitian matrix used to derive the Rabi formulas. The resulting effective two-level system, with 'anti-PT symmetry' meaning invariance under the combined operations of parity reversal and time reversal in a dissipative setting, is the mechanism that enables all the predicted photon-distribution effects.

What would settle it

Measure the complex eigenfrequencies of the two-mode system under Eq. (12) with $\gamma'\neq 0$: the full Hamiltonian (5) still has imaginary eigenvalues shifted by $+i\gamma'$ relative to the predicted real $E^R_\pm$, so a transmission or ringdown measurement that resolves that imaginary part would show the spectrum is not actually Hermitian. Equivalently, in a single-photon experiment, monitor the total probability $|\alpha_s(t)|^2+|\beta_s(t)|^2$; if it deviates from 1 over time, the dropped $+i\gamma'$ term is dynamically relevant.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the condition in Eq. (12), namely $\mathrm{Im}(\xi_1)=\gamma'-\kappa/2$, $\mathrm{Im}(\xi_2)=\gamma'+\kappa/2$, and $\vartheta=(2\ell+1)\pi/(2m)$, makes the two-nanoparticle Hamiltonian of Eq. (5) equivalent to a Hermitian matrix whose eigenvalues are real, and that the photon dynamics are then governed by that real matrix alone. In the paper's language, the system has 'transited' from an anti-PT-symmetric non-Hermitian regime to a quasi-closed Hermitian regime, with energy conserved under stable dynamic flow equilibrium. The stated eigenvalues are $E^R_\pm=\omega_d\pm\Lambda+\xi$ with $\Lambda=\sqrt{\Delta_{\mathrm{sag}}^2+\xi}$, and the single-photon probability amplitudes are $\alpha_s(t)=\Gamma(\cos\Lambda t-\Delta_{\mathrm{sag}}\sin\Lambda t/\Lambda)$ and $\beta_s(t)=-\Gamma\xi\sin\Lambda t/\Lambda$, where $\Gamma=e^{-it(\omega_d+\xi)}$. These are ordinary Rabi oscillations: at zero rotation the photon fully swaps between clockwise and counterclockwise modes, and as rotation speed grows the maximum exchange amplitude shrinks. The paper presents this as a way to control photonic transmission in a lossy system without removing the loss, by engineering the nanoparticle perturbations to cancel the relevant imaginary parts.

Load-bearing premise

The argument leans on the premise that after the tuning conditions are met, the leftover $+i\gamma'$ on the diagonal can be dropped, so the real part of the Hamiltonian alone determines the spectrum and the photon motion; unless that residual loss or gain is truly inactive, the 'quasi-closed' system is not actually Hermitian.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A photon initially in the clockwise mode will undergo coherent Rabi exchange with the counterclockwise mode, with full swap at zero rotation and with exchange amplitude shrinking as rotation speed increases.
The exchange frequency $\Lambda=\sqrt{\Delta_{\mathrm{sag}}^2+\xi}$ is controlled by two in-situ knobs: rotational angular velocity and nanoparticle perturbation strength.
The same tuning converts a strongly dissipative anti-PT spectrum into a real spectrum, so the system can serve as an anti-PT sensor whose readout is a frequency shift or a change in Rabi period.
Two-mode photon distribution control of this kind is a direct building block for isolators, routers, and reversible energy-transfer devices that need controllable exchange between two states.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper's quasi-closed step implicitly assumes the residual $+i\gamma'$ term has no dynamical effect; monitoring the total single-photon probability over time is a direct experimental check of that assumption.
The construction is demonstrated for two nanoparticles, but the same phase-cancellation trick should generalize to $N$ scatterers whose complex strengths are jointly constrained, a case the paper does not work out.
The recipe of canceling imaginary parts by tuning complex coupling phases is not obviously limited to microcavities and could be transplanted to other open platforms where complex couplings can be engineered externally.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: the paper has a clean model and a genuinely new control idea, but the central claim fails on its own equations. The specific two-nanoparticle condition (12) is a legitimate extension of the Wiersig framework, and the paper does a good job situating it in the spinning-resonator anti-PT literature. The problem is the step right after Eq. (12), where the authors state that the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian becomes Hermitian and energy-conserving. It does not. With their conditions, ε0 = ξ1+ξ2 carries imaginary part 2γ', so the diagonal of H' contains +iγ'. The off-diagonal becomes real, but the matrix is Re(H') + iγ'I, not Hermitian unless γ' = 0. The paper never imposes γ' = 0; the figures use ξ = γ' = 145 Hz. The later eigenvalues and dynamics are computed from Re(H') instead of H', without any justification. With the full H', the norm changes as d||ψ||²/dt = 2γ'||ψ||², so the plotted Rabi oscillations do not conserve photon number. Appendix B compounds this by writing the Schrödinger equation as a steady-state condition (time derivatives set to zero in Eqs. B1) before presenting time-dependent solutions. So the load-bearing premise—that nanoparticle perturbations alone close the system—is unsupported.

None of this is fatal to the underlying idea. The model is standard, the parameter-control scheme is plausible, and the paper is clearly written. The fix is straightforward in principle: either impose full loss-gain cancellation (γ' = 0) and adjust the conditions, or reframe the result as a constant-loss/gain shift that leaves the eigenvectors and the splitting unchanged. The Appendix B derivation needs to be redone with the actual time-dependent Schrödinger equation. The citations are appropriate; the authors are extending the right papers.

Who should read this? People working on non-Hermitian photonics or nanoparticle sensing might find the control idea interesting once corrected, but in its current form the advertised transition is not established. I would send it to peer review because the specific claim is checkable and the framework is standard; a serious referee could help the authors fix the derivation. But it is not acceptable as is.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a spinning whispering-gallery-mode resonator with two counter-propagating modes, a gain medium, and two nanoparticle scatterers. Its central claim is that when the imaginary parts of the nanoparticle perturbations and their angular separation satisfy Eq. (12), the effective non-Hermitian Hamiltonian H′ becomes a Hermitian "quasi-closed" Hamiltonian HR, so that the spectrum and photon dynamics (Eqs. (14)–(15)) show coherent, energy-conserving Rabi-like transfer between CW and CCW modes tunable by the rotation rate Ω and the perturbation strength. Sections III and IV present the spectral transition and the time-dependent photon distribution; Appendix A derives the model, and Appendix B derives the solutions.

Significance. The topic is timely, and the unperturbed anti-PT spectral analysis in Eqs. (9)–(11) is standard and clearly presented. If the claimed Hermitianization through nanoparticle-induced imaginary shifts were correct, it would offer a conceptually simple route to convert lossy resonators into coherent mode-swapping devices, with potential sensing and quantum-device applications. However, the central transformation is not established: Eq. (12) leaves an imaginary diagonal term iγ′I in H′, and the paper's subsequent spectrum and dynamics use Re(H′) without justification. Because this unsupported step is the basis for all later results, the main claim of the paper is not supported as written. The manuscript is analytical; the figures illustrate the claimed parameter regimes rather than providing an independent verification of the central transition.

major comments (3)

[§III, Eq. (12)] Under the conditions (12), writing ξ1 = Re ξ1 + i(γ′ − κ/2), ξ2 = Re ξ2 + i(γ′ + κ/2), and e^{±2imϑ} = −1, substitution into Eq. (5) gives diagonal entries Δ± − iγ′ + ξ1 + ξ2 = Δ± + Re(ξ1+ξ2) + iγ′ and off-diagonal entries iκ + ξ1 − ξ2 = Re(ξ1−ξ2). Hence H′ = Re(H′) + iγ′I, which is not Hermitian unless γ′ = γ − γg = 0. No such condition is imposed anywhere; in fact Fig. 3 uses ξ = γ′ = 145 Hz. The sentence after Eq. (12) about stable dynamic flow equilibrium does not provide a derivation that removes the +iγ′ term. The subsequent eigenvalues ER± and the time evolution in Sec. IV and Appendix B are computed with Re(H′) rather than H′, so the central claim that the non-Hermitian system becomes a Hermitian quasi-closed system is unsupported by the paper's own equations.
[§IV and Appendix B, Eqs. (B1) and (14)–(15)] The derivation of the photon dynamics is internally inconsistent. Eq. (B1) sets i dαs/dt = ... = 0 and i dβs/dt = ... = 0, which is a steady-state condition rather than the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, yet the text proceeds to obtain time-dependent solutions from a diagonalization of HR. Moreover, with the printed solutions (14)–(15), one obtains |αs(t)|² + |βs(t)|² = 1 − (Δsag/Λ) sin(2Λt), which is not equal to 1 when Δsag ≠ 0, as in Fig. 3. Thus the solutions do not describe probability-conserving evolution even under a Hermitian HR; the missing imaginary unit in the sine terms appears to be responsible for this discrepancy.
[§IV, after Eq. (13)] Even if the +iγ′I term were discarded, the real matrix used in Sec. IV is not determined by Eq. (12). Eq. (12) fixes the imaginary parts of ξ1 and ξ2 and the angle ϑ, but the residual real matrix has diagonal shift Re(ξ1+ξ2) and off-diagonal coupling Re(ξ1−ξ2). The eigenvalues and evolution in Eqs. (13)–(15) use the same ξ for both of these quantities, which requires the additional assumption Re(ξ1−ξ2) = Re(ξ1+ξ2), for instance Re ξ2 = 0. This condition is never stated or justified.

minor comments (4)

[Notation, Eqs. (13)–(15)] The symbol ξ is used both for the complex nanoparticle perturbation ξk and for Re(ξ1+ξ2), which obscures the formulas in Sec. IV; a distinct symbol such as ξR = Re(ξ1+ξ2) would remove the ambiguity.
[§III, after Eq. (13)] The definition Λ = (Δsag² + ξ)^{1/2} is dimensionally inconsistent because the argument of the square root must have units of frequency squared; it should presumably be Λ = (Δsag² + ξ²)^{1/2}. This typo propagates into the oscillation argument in Eqs. (14)–(15).
[Appendix B] The constants c1 and c2 are quoted as a/2Λ and −a/2Λ, but the symbol a is not defined in the text.
[References] Reference [51] is incomplete (missing volume, page, and year), and references [57] and [67] are arXiv preprints cited without full publication details; please standardize all citations.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The quasi-closed/Hermitian transition is definitional: Eq. (12) is chosen to make the off-diagonal of H' real, and HR is then declared to be Re(H'), although Eq. (12) leaves the diagonal of H' with a common +iγ'. The central spectrum and photon dynamics are those of the projected real part, not of the stated non-Hermitian Hamiltonian.

self definitional [Sec. III, immediately after Eq. (12) (the quasi-closed system passage); used again in Sec. IV and Appendix B]
"When the conditions of Eq. (12) are met, the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian (5) transforms into a Hermitian Hamiltonian HR, marking a transition from an open system to a quasi-closed system, while energy is conserved. ... As a result, the Hamiltonian (5) converts into a real form give by Re( ˆH ′)."

Substituting Eq. (12) into Eq. (5) yields off-diagonal elements iκ + ε1 = iκ + ε2 = Re(ξ1 − ξ2), which are real because Im(ξ1 − ξ2) = −κ and exp(±2imϑ) = −1. However, the diagonal elements become Δ± + Re(ξ1 + ξ2) + iγ′ because Im(ξ1) + Im(ξ2) = 2γ′, leaving +iγ′ after the −iγ′ in Eq. (5). Hence H′ = Re(H′) + iγ′I, which is not Hermitian. The claim that H′ 'transforms into Hermitian HR' and 'converts into a real form Re(H′)' therefore defines HR by discarding the common anti-Hermitian part. The spectrum ER± and the Rabi probabilities (14)-(15) are solved from HR, not from H′; no condition such as γ′ = 0 is imposed, and the numerics use ξ = γ′ = 145 Hz. The transition is thus true by construction of HR, not a derived property of the nanoparticle-perturbed Hamiltonian.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is: Eq. (5) defines the two-mode non-Hermitian Hamiltonian; Eq. (12) fixes nanoparticle parameters; the text then asserts that H′ transforms into a Hermitian HR and that the dynamics can be solved from HR. The circularity is in that last assertion. With Eq. (12) enforced, the off-diagonal of H′ indeed becomes real, so the real part Re(H′) is a symmetric matrix. But the diagonal of H′ carries +iγ′ because Im(ξ1) + Im(ξ2) = 2γ′; therefore H′ = Re(H′) + iγ′I. The Hermitian object HR is not obtained from H′ by a legitimate transformation; it is defined as Re(H′), omitting the anti-Hermitian identity term. All subsequent results, including ER± and the time-dependent photon probabilities (14)-(15), are properties of that projected matrix rather than of H′. Had the full H′ been evolved, d||ψ||²/dt = 2γ′||ψ||² would follow, contradicting the 'energy is conserved' statement. No fitting to data or external benchmark is present, and self-citations are not load-bearing. The flaw is a definitional replacement of the stated Hamiltonian by its real part, which makes the headline transition true by construction rather than by derivation. Appendix B has an additional internal inconsistency (it sets i dαs/dt = 0 and i dβs/dt = 0 yet reports time-dependent solutions), but that is a consistency issue rather than a circular input-output equivalence, so it is not scored as a separate circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim inherits the Wiersig Rayleigh-scattering model, the Sagnac-Fizeau formula, and the two-mode approximation from prior work. The paper's own contribution is a hand-selected condition on the imaginary parts of nanoparticle perturbations and the ad hoc decision to discard the residual diagonal term +iγ'. That decision is the most fragile input, and it is not derived or benchmarked.

free parameters (2)

Imaginary parts of nanoparticle perturbations, Im(ξ1), Im(ξ2) = Im(ξ1)=γ'-κ/2, Im(ξ2)=γ'+κ/2
Eq. (12) sets these by hand to make the off-diagonal coupling real; this is the key knob that produces the claimed spectral transition.
Real parts of nanoparticle perturbations, ξ=Re(ξ1+ξ2) and the off-diagonal difference Re(ξ1-ξ2) = ξ is set to γ'=145 Hz in Fig. 3; Re(ξ1-ξ2) is not specified but is effectively taken equal to ξ in Eqs. (14)-(15)
The quasi-closed eigenvalues and Rabi dynamics depend on both the diagonal shift and the off-diagonal coupling; the paper only defines the sum, leaving an unstated assumption about the difference.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Two-mode CW/CCW approximation remains valid with multiple nanoparticle perturbations
Invoked in Sec. II and Appendix A, based on Refs. [45,46]; requires the nanoparticles to rotate synchronously with the resonator and only one mode per propagation direction.
domain assumption Nanoparticle perturbation strength is ξk=ϖk-iλk with the standing-wave coupling matrix of Eq. (A5)
Taken from the Wiersig Rayleigh-scatterer model [45]; not re-derived here.
domain assumption Sagnac-Fizeau shift formula Δsag = nRΩω0/c (1 - 1/n^2 - (λ/n) dn/dλ)
Used in Eq. (3) following Ref. [50]; the dispersion term is neglected in the numerics.
ad hoc to paper The anti-Hermitian diagonal part +iγ' can be discarded when studying the quasi-closed system
Introduced after Eq. (12) via 'under stable dynamic flow equilibrium, energy is conserved' and used in Appendix B. No derivation; the full H' of Eq. (5) still contains +iγ' on the diagonal unless γ'=0, which is not assumed.
domain assumption Semi-classical approximation permits restriction to the single-photon subspace with quantum noise neglected
Used in Sec. IV and Appendix B, citing Ref. [60].

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Manipulating spectral transitions and photonic transmission in a non-Hermitian optical system through nanoparticle perturbations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K7EHWTAJ

@misc{pith2026241114862,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Manipulating spectral transitions and photonic transmission in a non-Hermitian optical system through nanoparticle perturbations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K7EHWTAJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14862}
}

abstract

In recent years, extensive research has been dedicated to the study of parity-time ($\mathcal{PT}$) symmetry, which involves the engineered balance of gain and loss in non-Hermitian optics. Complementary to $\mathcal{PT}$ symmetry, the concept of anti-$\mathcal{PT}$ symmetry has emerged as a natural framework for describing the dynamics of open systems with dissipations. In this work, we study spectral transitions and photon transmission in a linear spinning resonator perturbed by nanoparticles. First, we show that by precisely controlling the nanoparticle perturbations, the eigenvalues (or spectra) of a non-Hermitian system satisfying anti-$\mathcal{PT}$ symmetry can transit to that of a quasi-closed Hermitian system. Second, we outline the essential conditions for constructing a quasi-closed system and analyze its dynamic behavior with respect to photon transmission. By adjusting the rotational angular velocity of the spinning resonator and the strength of the nanoparticle perturbations, the quasi-closed system enables a variety of photon distribution behaviors, which may have significant applications in quantum devices. Our findings offer valuable insights for the design of dissipative quantum devices under realistic conditions and for understanding their responses to external perturbations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.14862 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Phase transition behavior of a spinning optical res [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. The dynamic photon distribution in a quasi-closed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

[1]

Miri and A

M.-A. Miri and A. Alu, Exceptional points in optics and photonics, Science 363, eaar7709 (2019)

2019
[2]

The eigenfrequencies in this phase form anti- conjugate pairs, and satisfies EB−APT + = − EB−APT − ∗ , with EB−APT + = −iγ′+ ¯∆

When ∆sag > κ, the system transitions into a phase where anti-PT symmetry broken, leading to bifurcating eigen- modes. The eigenfrequencies in this phase form anti- conjugate pairs, and satisfies EB−APT + = − EB−APT − ∗ , with EB−APT + = −iγ′+ ¯∆. The corresponding eigenstates are given by EB−APT ± = −i∆sag ± i ¯∆, κ T / C• ±, (11) where ¯∆ = q ∆2sag − κ2...

work page
[3]

A. Guo, G. J. Salamo, D. Duchesne, R. Morandotti, M. Volatier-Ravat, V. Aimez, G. A. Siviloglou, and D. N. Christodoulides, Observation of PT -symmetry breaking in complex optical potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 093902 (2009)

2009
[4]

Kato, Perturbation theory for linear operators, Vol

T. Kato, Perturbation theory for linear operators, Vol. 132 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

2013
[5]

C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real spectra in non- hermitian hamiltonians having PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243 (1998)

1998
[6]

C. M. Bender, Making sense of non-hermitian hamiltoni- ans, Reports on Progress in Physics 70, 947 (2007)

2007
[7]

El-Ganainy, K

R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non- hermitian physics and PT symmetry, Nature Physics 14, 11 (2018)

work page 2018
[8]

Chang, X

L. Chang, X. Jiang, S. Hua, C. Yang, J. Wen, L. Jiang, G. Li, G. Wang, and M. Xiao, Parity–time symmetry and variable optical isolation in active–passive-coupled microresonators, Nature photonics 8, 524 (2014)

2014

Show all 78 references

[9]

Peng, S ¸

B. Peng, S ¸. K.¨Ozdemir, F. Lei, F. Monifi, M. Gianfreda, G. L. Long, S. Fan, F. Nori, C. M. Bender, and L. Yang, Parity–time-symmetric whispering-gallery microcavities, Nature Physics 10, 394 (2014)

2014
[10]

Zhang, Y

Z. Zhang, Y. Zhang, J. Sheng, L. Yang, M.-A. Miri, D. N. Christodoulides, B. He, Y. Zhang, and M. Xiao, Observa- tion of parity-time symmetry in optically induced atomic lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 123601 (2016)

2016
[11]

J. Li, A. K. Harter, J. Liu, L. de Melo, Y. N. Joglekar, and L. Luo, Observation of parity-time symmetry breaking transitions in a dissipative floquet system of ultracold atoms, Nature communications 10, 855 (2019)

2019
[12]

X. Zhu, H. Ramezani, C. Shi, J. Zhu, and X. Zhang, PT - symmetric acoustics, Phys. Rev. X 4, 031042 (2014). 8

2014
[13]

Fleury, D

R. Fleury, D. Sounas, and A. Al` u, An invisible acoustic sensor based on parity-time symmetry, Nature commu- nications 6, 5905 (2015)

2015
[14]

Ramezani, T

H. Ramezani, T. Kottos, R. El-Ganainy, and D. N. Christodoulides, Unidirectional nonlinear PT -symmetric optical structures, Phys. Rev. A 82, 043803 (2010)

2010
[15]

Bender, S

N. Bender, S. Factor, J. D. Bodyfelt, H. Ramezani, D. N. Christodoulides, F. M. Ellis, and T. Kottos, Observation of asymmetric transport in structures with active nonlin- earities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 234101 (2013)

2013
[16]

K.¨Ozdemir, S

S ¸. K.¨Ozdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, and L. Yang, Parity– time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics, Na- ture materials 18, 783 (2019)

2019
[17]

Ge and H

L. Ge and H. E. T¨ ureci, Antisymmetric PT -photonic structures with balanced positive- and negative-index materials, Phys. Rev. A 88, 053810 (2013)

2013
[18]

P. Peng, W. Cao, C. Shen, W. Qu, J. Wen, L. Jiang, and Y. Xiao, Anti-parity–time symmetry with flying atoms, Nature Physics 12, 1139 (2016)

2016
[19]

Jiang, Y

Y. Jiang, Y. Mei, Y. Zuo, Y. Zhai, J. Li, J. Wen, and S. Du, Anti-parity-time symmetric optical four-wave mix- ing in cold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 193604 (2019)

2019
[20]

Y. He, J. Wu, Y. Hu, J.-X. Zhang, and S.-Y. Zhu, Uni- directional reflectionless anti-parity-time-symmetric pho- tonic lattices of thermal atoms, Phys. Rev. A105, 043712 (2022)

2022
[21]

Yang, Y.-P

Y. Yang, Y.-P. Wang, J. W. Rao, Y. S. Gui, B. M. Yao, W. Lu, and C.-M. Hu, Unconventional singularity in anti-parity-time symmetric cavity magnonics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 147202 (2020)

2020
[22]

J. Zhao, Y. Liu, L. Wu, C.-K. Duan, Y.-x. Liu, and J. Du, Observation of anti- PT -symmetry phase transi- tion in the magnon-cavity-magnon coupled system, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 014053 (2020)

2020
[23]

Stegmaier, S

A. Stegmaier, S. Imhof, T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, C. H. Lee, M. Kremer, A. Fritzsche, T. Feichtner, S. Klembt, S. H¨ ofling, I. Boettcher, I. C. Fulga, L. Ma, O. G. Schmidt, M. Greiter, T. Kiessling, A. Szameit, and R. Thomale, Topological defect engineering andPT sym- metry in n...

2021
[24]

Li, Y.-G

Y. Li, Y.-G. Peng, L. Han, M.-A. Miri, W. Li, M. Xiao, X.-F. Zhu, J. Zhao, A. Al` u, S. Fan, et al., Anti-parity- time symmetry in diffusive systems, Science 364, 170 (2019)

2019
[25]

Zhang, Y

F. Zhang, Y. Feng, X. Chen, L. Ge, and W. Wan, Syn- thetic anti-pt symmetry in a single microcavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 053901 (2020)

2020
[26]

F. Wang, X. Niu, X. Hu, T. Gu, X. Wang, J. Yang, H. Yang, Y. Ao, S. Wang, and Q. Gong, All-optical mode-selective router based on broken anti- PT symme- try, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 044050 (2020)

2020
[27]

Bergman, R

A. Bergman, R. Duggan, K. Sharma, M. Tur, A. Zadok, and A. Al` u, Observation of anti-parity-time-symmetry, phase transitions and exceptional points in an optical fibre, Nature Communications 12, 486 (2021)

2021
[28]

Feng and X

Z. Feng and X. Sun, Harnessing dynamical encircling of an exceptional point in anti- PT -symmetric integrated photonic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 273601 (2022)

2022
[29]

Zhang, T

X.-L. Zhang, T. Jiang, and C. T. Chan, Dynamically en- circling an exceptional point in anti-parity-time symmet- ric systems: asymmetric mode switching for symmetry- broken modes, Light: Science & Applications 8, 88 (2019)

2019
[30]

S. Park, D. Lee, K. Park, H. Shin, Y. Choi, and J. W. Yoon, Optical energy-difference conservation in a syn- thetic anti-pt-symmetric system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 083601 (2021)

2021
[31]

Y. Choi, C. Hahn, J. W. Yoon, and S. H. Song, Ob- servation of an anti-pt-symmetric exceptional point and energy-difference conserving dynamics in electrical cir- cuit resonators, Nature communications 9, 2182 (2018)

2018
[32]

J. Zhu, S. K. Ozdemir, Y.-F. Xiao, L. Li, L. He, D.-R. Chen, and L. Yang, On-chip single nanoparticle detection and sizing by mode splitting in an ultrahigh-q microres- onator, Nature photonics 4, 46 (2010)

2010
[33]

A. M. Armani, R. P. Kulkarni, S. E. Fraser, R. C. Flagan, and K. J. Vahala, Label-free, single-molecule detection with optical microcavities, Science 317, 783 (2007)

2007
[34]

Deych, M

L. Deych, M. Ostrowski, and Y. Yi, Defect-induced whispering-gallery-mode resonances in optical microdisk resonators, Optics letters 36, 3154 (2011)

2011
[35]

Song and Y

Q. Song and Y. L. Kim, Perturbation of nanoparticle on deformed microcavity, Journal of lightwave technology 28, 2818 (2010)

2010
[36]

J. T. Rubin and L. Deych, Ab initio theory of defect scat- tering in spherical whispering-gallery-mode resonators, Phys. Rev. A 81, 053827 (2010)

2010
[37]

Mazzei, S

A. Mazzei, S. G¨ otzinger, L. de S. Menezes, G. Zumofen, O. Benson, and V. Sandoghdar, Controlled coupling of counterpropagating whispering-gallery modes by a sin- gle rayleigh scatterer: A classical problem in a quantum optical light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 173603 (2007)

2007
[38]

T. J. Kippenberg, A. L. Tchebotareva, J. Kalkman, A. Polman, and K. J. Vahala, Purcell-factor-enhanced scattering from si nanocrystals in an optical microcavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 027406 (2009)

2009
[39]

Zhu, S ¸

J. Zhu, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, L. He, and L. Yang, Controlled manipulation of mode splitting in an optical microcav- ity by two rayleigh scatterers, Optics Express 18, 23535 (2010)

2010
[40]

Maayani, R

S. Maayani, R. Dahan, Y. Kligerman, E. Moses, A. U. Hassan, H. Jing, F. Nori, D. N. Christodoulides, and T. Carmon, Flying couplers above spinning resonators generate irreversible refraction, Nature 558, 569 (2018)

2018
[41]

Zhang, R

H. Zhang, R. Huang, S.-D. Zhang, Y. Li, C.-W. Qiu, F. Nori, and H. Jing, Breaking anti-pt symmetry by spin- ning a resonator, Nano Letters 20, 7594 (2020)

2020
[42]

J. Y. Sun and H. Z. Shen, Photon blockade in non- hermitian optomechanical systems with nonreciprocal couplings, Phys. Rev. A 107, 043715 (2023)

2023
[43]

M. Peng, H. Zhang, Q. Zhang, T.-X. Lu, I. M. Mirza, and H. Jing, Nonreciprocal slow or fast light in anti- PT -symmetric optomechanics, Phys. Rev. A107, 033507 (2023)

2023
[44]

Lai, Y.-K

Y.-H. Lai, Y.-K. Lu, M.-G. Suh, Z. Yuan, and K. Vahala, Observation of the exceptional-point-enhanced sagnac ef- fect, Nature 576, 65 (2019)

2019
[45]

H. Jing, H. L¨ u, S. ¨Ozdemir, T. Carmon, and F. Nori, Nanoparticle sensing with a spinning resonator, Optica 5, 1424 (2018)

2018
[46]

Wiersig, Structure of whispering-gallery modes in op- tical microdisks perturbed by nanoparticles, Phys

J. Wiersig, Structure of whispering-gallery modes in op- tical microdisks perturbed by nanoparticles, Phys. Rev. A 84, 063828 (2011)

2011
[47]

J. Wiersig, Enhancing the sensitivity of frequency and energy splitting detection by using exceptional points: 9 Application to microcavity sensors for single-particle de- tection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 203901 (2014)

2014
[48]

H. L¨ u, C. Wang, L. Yang, and H. Jing, Optomechanically induced transparency at exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 014006 (2018)

2018
[49]

Peng, S ¸

B. Peng, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, M. Liertzer, W. Chen, J. Kramer, H. Yılmaz, J. Wiersig, S. Rotter, and L. Yang, Chiral modes and directional lasing at exceptional points, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, 6845 (2016)

2016
[50]

Chen, S ¸

W. Chen, S ¸. Kaya ¨Ozdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, and L. Yang, Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity, Nature 548, 192 (2017)

2017
[51]

G. B. Malykin, The sagnac effect: correct and incorrect explanations, Physics-Uspekhi 43, 1229 (2000)

2000
[52]

D. E. Chang, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum nonlinear optics — photon by photon, Nature Photonics 8, 685
[53]

Aellen and D

M. Aellen and D. J. Norris, Understanding Optical Gain: Which Confinement Factor is Correct?, ACS Photonics 9, 3498
[54]

L. K. Smirani, A. N. Z. Rashed, S. K. H. Ahammad, M. A. Hossain, M. G. Daher, and E. Fahmy, Con- ventional/linear/Lorentzian material gain semiconductor optical amplifiers performance signature with four wave mixing (FWM) nonlinearity in optical fiber communi- cation systems, ...

doi
[55]

Armani, T

D. Armani, T. Kippenberg, S. Spillane, and K. Vahala, Ultra-high-q toroid microcavity on a chip, Nature 421, 925 (2003)

2003
[56]

V. Huet, A. Rasoloniaina, P. Guillem´ e, P. Rochard, P. F´ eron, M. Mortier, A. Levenson, K. Bencheikh, A. Ya- comotti, and Y. Dumeige, Millisecond photon lifetime in a slow-light microcavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 133902 (2016)

2016
[57]

Peng, S ¸.¨Ozdemir, S

B. Peng, S ¸.¨Ozdemir, S. Rotter, H. Yilmaz, M. Liertzer, F. Monifi, C. Bender, F. Nori, and L. Yang, Loss- induced suppression and revival of lasing, Science 346, 328 (2014)

2014
[58]

Shang, Coupling enhancement and symmetrization of single-photon optomechanics in open quantum systems, arXiv: 2302.04897 (2023)

C. Shang, Coupling enhancement and symmetrization of single-photon optomechanics in open quantum systems, arXiv: 2302.04897 (2023)

2023
[59]

Hodaei, A

H. Hodaei, A. U. Hassan, S. Wittek, H. Garcia-Gracia, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Kha- javikhan, Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order excep- tional points, Nature 548, 187 (2017)

2017
[60]

L. Xue, Z. Gong, H. Zhu, and Z. Wang, PT symmetric phase transition and photonic transmission in an optical trimer system, Optics Express 25, 17249 (2017)

2017
[61]

Z. R. Gong, H. Ian, L. Zhou, and C. P. Sun, Control- ling quasibound states in a one-dimensional continuum through an electromagnetically-induced-transparency mechanism, Phys. Rev. A 78, 053806 (2008)

2008
[62]

Shang and H

C. Shang and H. Li, Resonance-dominant optomechani- cal entanglement in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 044048 (2024)

2024
[63]

M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum optics (Cam- bridge university press, 1997)

1997
[64]

Gardiner and P

C. Gardiner and P. Zoller, Quantum noise: a handbook of Markovian and non-Markovian quantum stochastic meth- ods with applications to quantum optics(Springer Science & Business Media, 2004)

2004
[65]

Z.-G. Lu, C. Shang, Y. Wu, and X.-Y. L¨ u, Analytical ap- proach to higher-order correlation functions in u(1) sym- metric systems, Phys. Rev. A 108, 053703 (2023)

2023
[66]

Bechler, A

O. Bechler, A. Borne, and S. R. et. al, A passive pho- ton–atom qubit swap operation, Nature Physics 14, 996 (2018)

2018
[67]

F. H. Kamin, F. T. Tabesh, S. Salimi, F. Kheirandish, and A. C. Santos, Non-markovian effects on charging and self-discharging process of quantum batteries, New Jour- nal of Physics 22, 083007 (2020)

2020
[68]

Z.-G. Lu, G. Tian, X.-Y. L¨ u, and C. Shang, Topological quantum batteries, arXiv: 2405.03675 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[69]

K. Xia, F. Nori, and M. Xiao, Cavity-free optical isola- tors and circulators using a chiral cross-kerr nonlinearity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 203602 (2018)

2018
[70]

Shang, H

C. Shang, H. Shen, and X. Yi, Nonreciprocity in a strongly coupled three-mode optomechanical circulatory system, Optics Express 27, 25882 (2019)

2019
[71]

Li, D.-S

E.-Z. Li, D.-S. Ding, Y.-C. Yu, and et. al, Experimental demonstration of cavity-free optical isolators and optical circulators, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033517 (2020)

2020
[72]

H. Z. Shen, C. Shang, Y. H. Zhou, and X. X. Yi, Uncon- ventional single-photon blockade in non-markovian sys- tems, Phys. Rev. A 98, 023856 (2018)

2018
[73]

Aharonovich, D

I. Aharonovich, D. Englund, and M. Toth, Solid-state single-photon emitters, Nature photonics 10, 631 (2016)

2016
[74]

H. Sun, C. Shang, X. Luo, Y. Zhou, and H. Shen, Optical- assisted photon blockade in a cavity system via para- metric interactions, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 58, 3640 (2019)

2019
[75]

M. P. Hokmabadi, A. Schumer, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Non-hermitian ring laser gyro- scopes with enhanced sagnac sensitivity, Nature 576, 70 (2019)

2019
[76]

X.-W. Luo, C. Zhang, and S. Du, Quantum squeez- ing and sensing with pseudo-anti-parity-time symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 173602 (2022)

2022
[77]

L. Wang, N. Liu, C. Wu, and G. Chen, Dynamical encir- cling of multiple exceptional points in anti-pt symmetry system, Opt. Express 32, 21616 (2024)

2024
[78]

Mandal and E

I. Mandal and E. J. Bergholtz, Symmetry and higher- order exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 186601 (2021)

2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Miri and A

M.-A. Miri and A. Alu, Exceptional points in optics and photonics, Science 363, eaar7709 (2019)

2019

[2] [2]

The eigenfrequencies in this phase form anti- conjugate pairs, and satisfies EB−APT + = − EB−APT − ∗ , with EB−APT + = −iγ′+ ¯∆

When ∆sag > κ, the system transitions into a phase where anti-PT symmetry broken, leading to bifurcating eigen- modes. The eigenfrequencies in this phase form anti- conjugate pairs, and satisfies EB−APT + = − EB−APT − ∗ , with EB−APT + = −iγ′+ ¯∆. The corresponding eigenstates are given by EB−APT ± = −i∆sag ± i ¯∆, κ T / C• ±, (11) where ¯∆ = q ∆2sag − κ2...

work page

[3] [3]

A. Guo, G. J. Salamo, D. Duchesne, R. Morandotti, M. Volatier-Ravat, V. Aimez, G. A. Siviloglou, and D. N. Christodoulides, Observation of PT -symmetry breaking in complex optical potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 093902 (2009)

2009

[4] [4]

Kato, Perturbation theory for linear operators, Vol

T. Kato, Perturbation theory for linear operators, Vol. 132 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

2013

[5] [5]

C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real spectra in non- hermitian hamiltonians having PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243 (1998)

1998

[6] [6]

C. M. Bender, Making sense of non-hermitian hamiltoni- ans, Reports on Progress in Physics 70, 947 (2007)

2007

[7] [7]

El-Ganainy, K

R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non- hermitian physics and PT symmetry, Nature Physics 14, 11 (2018)

work page 2018

[8] [8]

Chang, X

L. Chang, X. Jiang, S. Hua, C. Yang, J. Wen, L. Jiang, G. Li, G. Wang, and M. Xiao, Parity–time symmetry and variable optical isolation in active–passive-coupled microresonators, Nature photonics 8, 524 (2014)

2014