Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 72 references

Twice Fourier transformable measures and diffraction theory

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For measures on locally compact abelian groups, double Fourier transformability is equivalent to translation boundedness, unifying diffraction theory.

desk verdict A careful, honest review that unifies existing diffraction frameworks via mild distributions; the genuinely new piece is the W0-weighted model set extension in Section 10, which holds up on inspection. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14987 v1 pith:7WUMUICD submitted 2024-11-22 math-ph math.MP

Hans G. Feichtinger , Christoph Richard , Christoph Schumacher , Nicolae Strungaru This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MP MSC 43A2552C2342B10
keywords twiceFouriertransformablemeasuresmilddistributionsSegalalgebraS0(G)translationboundeddiffractiontheoryweightedmodelsetsPoissonsummationformulaWieneramalgamspaces
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that the class of measures that can be Fourier transformed twice in the AG Fourier theory—where a measure's Fourier transform is required to be a measure—is exactly the class of AG-transformable measures that are translation bounded. Equivalently, a translation bounded measure on a locally compact abelian group is twice transformable precisely when its Fourier transform as a mild distribution is again a translation bounded measure. Because every translation bounded measure is automatically a mild distribution, the diffraction theory of translation bounded measures can be developed in one test-function framework, subsuming both the tempered-distribution approach and the AG measure approach. For weighted model sets with weights in the Segal algebra $W_0(H)$, the paper derives pure point diffraction with explicit Bragg intensities, using a Poisson summation formula for the underlying lattice.

What carries the argument

The machinery is built from bounded uniform partitions of unity (BUPUs), which control local support, uniform boundedness, and finite overlap of a partition of unity on arbitrary locally compact abelian groups. The Wiener algebra $W(G)$ is defined by absolute summability of local pieces, and its dual is identified with translation bounded measures. The smaller Segal algebra $S_0(G)$ is defined from the Fourier algebra in the same way; its dual, the mild distributions, carries a bijective Fourier transform and contains translation bounded measures. The load-bearing identity is the Poisson summation formula for the lattice $L$ in $G\times H$, valid on the larger Segal algebra $W_0(G\times H)$, which turns the lattice comb into $\operatorname{dens}(L)$ times the dual lattice comb and drives the pure point diffraction computation.

What would settle it

Compute the Poisson summation identity $\omega_h(g) = \operatorname{dens}(L)\,\omega_{\hat h}(\hat g)$ for a cut-and-project scheme with non-euclidean groups, such as a $p$-adic internal space, and a weight $h$ in $W_0(H)$ but not in the Schwartz–Bruhat class; a single pair $(h,g)$ where the two sides differ would disprove Theorem 10.2 and the pure point diffraction conclusion. Independently, a translation bounded measure $\mu$ whose mild Fourier transform is a Radon measure that is not translation bounded would disprove Theorem 8.8.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is Theorem 8.8: for a measure $\mu$ on an LCA group $G$, double AG transformability is equivalent to AG transformability plus translation boundedness, and also equivalent to the existence of a translation bounded measure $\nu$ on the dual group with $\mu(f)=\nu(\hat f)$ for all $f$ in $S_0(G)$. The second transform therefore requires no separate existence argument once a translation bounded measure has a measure-valued Fourier transform on the dense test space. The same mild-distribution machinery turns the diffraction measure of a translation bounded measure into the Fourier transform of its autocorrelation. For weighted model sets with weight $h$ in $W_0(H)$, the Fourier transform is $\operatorname{dens}(L)$ times the dual weighted comb, so the diffraction measure is pure point with intensities $\operatorname{dens}(L)^2 |\hat h(\eta)|^2$ at the contributing dual-lattice points.

Load-bearing premise

Everything in the model-set section rests on the unproved Poisson summation formula for the Segal algebra $W_0(G\times H)$, cited from the literature; if that formula fails at the stated level of generality, the conclusion that weighted model set combs are twice transformable with pure point diffraction loses its justification.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every twice AG transformable measure is translation bounded, and every AG-transformable measure that is translation bounded is automatically twice transformable.
  • For translation bounded measures, the diffraction measure exists as a translation bounded measure on the dual group and is the mild Fourier transform of the autocorrelation.
  • The Fourier–Bohr coefficients of a twice transformable measure equal the point masses of its Fourier transform, so pure point diffraction can be read directly from the transform.
  • Weighted model sets with weights in $W_0(H)$ are twice AG transformable and strongly almost periodic, and their diffraction is pure point with intensities $\operatorname{dens}(L)^2 |\hat h(\eta)|^2$.
  • The Poisson summation formula on $W_0(G\times H)$ extends pure point diffraction computations for weighted model sets beyond euclidean cut-and-project schemes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if Theorem 8.8 holds, checking double transformability of a translation bounded measure reduces to computing its Fourier transform as a mild distribution and testing whether that distribution is a translation bounded measure.
  • Beyond the paper: the mild-measure framework invites a diffraction theory for Radon measures that are mild but not translation bounded, where the autocorrelation step would have to be reformulated.
  • Beyond the paper: the authors call extension to arbitrary LCA groups via van Hove nets straightforward but do not prove it; testing the Poisson summation formula and the diffraction statements on non-second-countable groups is a concrete open task.
  • Beyond the paper: the weight class $W_0(H)$ is larger than the Schwartz–Bruhat class, so the weighted-model-set results are testable for non-smooth weights whose Fourier transforms are integrable enough to lie in the Wiener algebra.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops mathematical diffraction theory for translation bounded measures on locally compact abelian groups using Wiener amalgams and Feichtinger's algebra S0(G) as test function spaces. It reviews the construction of bounded uniform partitions of unity, the Wiener algebra and Feichtinger's algebra, mild distributions, and the Fourier theory of measures in the sense of Argabright and Gil de Lamadrid. The central results are Theorem 8.8, characterizing twice AG transformable measures as precisely those that are AG transformable and translation bounded (equivalently, translation bounded and agreeing with a translation bounded measure on the dual group over S0(G)), and Theorem 10.2, a Poisson summation formula for weighted model sets with weights in W0(H), yielding pure point diffraction with intensities dens(L)^2 |\hat{h}(\eta)|^2.

Significance. If the proof issues flagged below are corrected, this is a valuable consolidation: it gives a self-contained treatment of BUPUs, identifies translation bounded measures with the dual of the Wiener algebra, subsumes the AG Fourier theory under mild distribution theory, and extends Poisson summation to W0 test functions in a way that directly yields diffraction results for weighted model sets. The paper is careful and largely expository, with detailed proofs of Theorem 8.3 and Theorem 8.8 and explicit statements of the new W0-level results. It contains no fitted parameters or empirically tuned assumptions; the main results are grounded in standard harmonic analysis and properly credited.

major comments (3)
  1. [Theorem 8.8, proof of (c)⇒(a)] The final displayed chain "ν(ϕ) = ν(pf) = μ(f) = μ~(pϕ)" with f = pϕ is not valid under the paper's own conventions. By Theorem 6.5(a), p(pϕ) = ϕ~, so ν(pf) = ν(ϕ~), not ν(ϕ); and μ(f) = μ(pϕ) is not μ~(pϕ) in general. The argument can be repaired by taking f = p(ϕ~), because then p(p(ϕ~)) = ϕ and μ(p(ϕ~)) = μ((pϕ)~) = μ~(pϕ). This correction is necessary for the proof of the claimed equivalence.
  2. [Theorem 8.3, proof of the forward direction] With σ = (ι\widehat{\mu})^\wedge, the double-Fourier identity p(pτ) = τ~ from Theorem 6.5(a) gives pσ = (ι\widehat{\mu})~, not pσ = ι\widehat{\mu} as stated. The conclusion that ι\widehat{\mu} belongs to ι(M^8(\widehat{G})) still follows because reflection preserves translation boundedness, but the displayed equality "pσ = ιpμ" is false and the proof must be rewritten to use pσ = (ι\widehat{\mu})~.
  3. [Section 10.2, Proposition 10.4] The proof refers to "Theorem 6.2" when applying the Poisson summation formula for weighted model sets; this should be Theorem 10.2. While this is a citation slip rather than a mathematical error, it appears in the proof of the main diffraction result of the section and should be fixed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors, including "Skecth of proof" (Section 5.2), "bouded" and "translation bouded" (Remark 6.2), and "admissble" (Section 10.3).
  2. [Section 9.3] The sentence "recalling W^1(G) ⊆ S1_0(G)" is imprecise: W^1(G) is the dual of the Wiener algebra, not literally a subspace of S1_0(G). What is meant is the canonical embedding of translation bounded measures into mild distributions, i.e., M^8(G) ⊆ S1_0(G) via restriction.
  3. [Section 10.3, last paragraph] The expression "|1_W R L1ppHq" is garbled; it should presumably read "|\widehat{1_W}| ∉ L^1(\widehat{H})".
  4. [Remark 8.7] The remark refers to [60, Lem. 5.2] for the implication ω_h∈MT(G) ⇒ \widehat{h}∈L^1(\widehat{H}); adding one line explaining why this is consistent with the W0 condition would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: central results are proved from definitions and standard external theorems.

full rationale

The paper is a review that re-proves its central structural claims rather than assuming them. Theorem 8.8 is proved from the definition of AG transformability, Corollary 7.8, Lemma 8.2, and density arguments; no step in that proof reduces to the conclusion. The main external input for Section 10 is the Poisson summation formula on the Segal algebra W0(G x H), cited to [33, p. 1617] (and [10], [17]); this is a standard harmonic-analysis theorem, independent of the weighted-model-set diffraction claim, and the paper uses it as a lemma rather than as a conclusion. The almost-periodicity facts used in Proposition 10.4, cited to [44, Thm. 7.6] and [50, Thm. 4.10.14], are parameter-free published theorems about strongly almost periodic measures and do not assume the weighted model set diffraction formula. Although many cited results originate in work by the present authors, they are either proved in the text or are external theorems with independent statements; the self-citations function as provenance, not as load-bearing reductions. There are no fitted parameters, no predictions that reproduce input data by construction, and no definition defined in terms of the target result.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities; this is pure mathematics. The axioms are standard harmonic analysis facts and the cited Poisson summation formula for the Segal algebra W0.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Every LCA group G admits bounded uniform partitions of unity of arbitrarily small size with Delone point family.
    Proved in Sections 2-3 via Zorn's lemma and the structure theorem; foundation for defining W(G) and S0(G).
  • standard math Dual of the Wiener algebra W(G) is the space of translation bounded measures.
    Theorem 7.1, re-proved in the paper, citing [45, Thm. 6.1]; identifies M8(G) with W'(G).
  • standard math Feichtinger's algebra S0(G) is a Fourier-invariant strongly character invariant Segal algebra, with S0(G) tensor S0(H) = S0(G x H).
    Quoted from [17,33]; used to define mild distributions and to handle product groups.
  • standard math Poisson summation formula holds for discrete co-compact subgroup L in G x H for test functions in W0(G x H).
    Invoked at the start of Theorem 10.2, cited to [33, p.1617]; not derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption G is second countable and has van Hove sequences for diffraction, with extension to van Hove nets straightforward.
    Section 9 restricts to second countable groups; this is a convenience assumption rather than a mathematical limitation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Twice Fourier transformable measures and diffraction theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7WUMUICD

@misc{pith2026241114987,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Twice Fourier transformable measures and diffraction theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7WUMUICD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14987}
}
read the original abstract

Mathematical diffraction theory has been developed since about 1995. Hof's initial approach relied on tempered distributions in euclidean space. Nowadays often the Fourier theory by Argabright and Gil de Lamadrid is used, which applies to appropriate measures on locally compact abelian groups. We review diffraction theory using Wiener amalgams as test function spaces. For translation bounded measures, this unifies and simplifies the former two approaches. We treat weighted versions of Meyer's model sets as examples.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [33]

    Jakobsen, On a (no longer) new Segal algebra - a review of the Feichtinge r algebra, J

    M.S. Jakobsen, On a (no longer) new Segal algebra - a review of the Feichtinge r algebra, J. Fourier. Anal. Appl. 24, 1579–1660, 2018

    work page 2018

  2. [44]

    Lenz, and N

    D. Lenz, and N. Strungaru, On weakly almost periodic measures , Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 371, 6843–6881, 2019

    work page 2019

  3. [1]

    Argabright and J

    L.N. Argabright and J. Gil de Lamadrid, Fourier Analysis of Unbounded Measures on Locally Compact Abelian Groups , Memoirs of the Amer. Math. Soc. 145, 1974

    work page 1974

  4. [2]

    Argabright and J

    L.N. Argabright and J. Gil de Lamadrid, Über fastperiodische Maße , in: Winter- schule 1979, Internationale Arbeitstagung über Topologis che Gruppen und Gruppe- nalgebren, 27–32, 1979

    work page 1979

  5. [3]

    Baake and D

    M. Baake and D. Lenz, Dynamical systems on translation bounded measures: pure point dynamical and diffraction spectra , Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 24, 1867–1893, 2004. TWICE FOURIER TRANSFORMABLE MEASURES 43

    work page 2004

  6. [4]

    Baake and R.V

    M. Baake and R.V. Moody, Weighted Dirac combs with pure point diffraction , Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelle’s J ournal) 573, 61–94, 2004

    work page 2004

  7. [5]

    Baake and N

    M. Baake and N. Strungaru, A note on tempered measures , Colloq. Math. 172, 15–30, 2023

    work page 2023

  8. [6]

    Berg and G

    C. Berg and G. Forst, Potential Theory on Locally Compact Abelian Groups , Springer, Berlin, 1975

    work page 1975

Show all 72 references
  1. [7]

    Bruhat, Distributions sur un groupe localement compact et applicat ions à l’étude des représentations des groupes ℘ -adiques, Bull

    F. Bruhat, Distributions sur un groupe localement compact et applicat ions à l’étude des représentations des groupes ℘ -adiques, Bull. Soc. Math. France 89, 43–75, 1961

    1961

  2. [8]

    de Bruijn, Quasicrystals and their Fourier transform , Nederl

    N.G. de Bruijn, Quasicrystals and their Fourier transform , Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Indag. Math. 48, 123–152, 1986

    1986

  3. [9]

    de Bruijn, Modulated quasicrystals , Nederl

    N.G. de Bruijn, Modulated quasicrystals , Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Indag. Math. 49, 121–132, 1987

    1987

  4. [10]

    Bürger, Functions of translation type and functorial properties of Segal algebras

    R. Bürger, Functions of translation type and functorial properties of Segal algebras. II., Monatsh. Math. 92, 253–268, 1981

    1981

  5. [11]

    Deitmar and S

    A. Deitmar and S. Echterhoff, Principles of Harmonic Analysis , Springer, New York, 2009

    2009

  6. [12]

    Feichtinger, Multipliers from L1pGq to a Homogeneous Banach Space , in: J

    H.G. Feichtinger, Multipliers from L1pGq to a Homogeneous Banach Space , in: J. Math. Anal. and Appl. 61, 241–356, 1977

    1977

  7. [13]

    Feichtinger, A characterization of Wiener’s algebra on locally compact g roups, Arch

    H.G. Feichtinger, A characterization of Wiener’s algebra on locally compact g roups, Arch. Math. (Basel) 29, 136–140, 1977

    1977

  8. [14]

    H.G. Feichtinger, Eine neue Segalalgebra mit Anwendungen in der Harmonischen Analyse, in: Winterschule 1979, Internationale Arbeitstagung über Top ologische Gruppen und Gruppenalgebren , 23–25, 1979

    1979

  9. [15]

    Feichtinger, Un espace de Banach de distributions tempérées sur les group es localement compacts abéliens , C

    H.G. Feichtinger, Un espace de Banach de distributions tempérées sur les group es localement compacts abéliens , C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. A-B 290, A791–A794, 1980

    1980

  10. [16]

    Feichtinger, A characterization of minimal homogeneous Banach spaces , Proc

    H.G. Feichtinger, A characterization of minimal homogeneous Banach spaces , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 81, 55–61, 1981

    1981

  11. [17]

    Feichtinger, On a new Segal algebra , Monatshefte für Mathematik 92, 269– 289, 1981

    H.G. Feichtinger, On a new Segal algebra , Monatshefte für Mathematik 92, 269– 289, 1981

    1981

  12. [18]

    Feichtinger, Banach spaces of distributions of Wiener’s type and interpo lation, Functional analysis and approximation (Oberwolfach, 1980 ), Internat

    H.G. Feichtinger, Banach spaces of distributions of Wiener’s type and interpo lation, Functional analysis and approximation (Oberwolfach, 1980 ), Internat. Ser. Numer. Math., 60, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel-Boston, 153–165, 1981

    1980

  13. [19]

    Feichtinger, Banach convolution algebras of Wiener type , Functions, series, operators, Vol

    H.G. Feichtinger, Banach convolution algebras of Wiener type , Functions, series, operators, Vol. I, II (Budapest, 1980), Colloq. Math. Soc. J ános Bolyai 35, North- Holland, Amsterdam, 509–524, 1983

    1980

  14. [20]

    Feichtinger, Banach spaces of distributions defined by decomposition met hods

    H.G. Feichtinger, Banach spaces of distributions defined by decomposition met hods. II. Math. Nachr. 132, 207–237, 1987

    1987

  15. [21]

    Feichtinger, New results on regular and irregular sampling based on Wiene r amalgams, in: K

    H.G. Feichtinger, New results on regular and irregular sampling based on Wiene r amalgams, in: K. Jarosz (ed.), Function Spaces , Proc. Conf., Edwardsville/IL (USA) 1990, Notes Pure Appl. Math. 136, 107–121, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1992

    1990

  16. [22]

    Feichtinger, Homogeneous Banach spaces as Banach convolution modules ov er M pGq, Mathematics 10, article 364, 2022

    H.G. Feichtinger, Homogeneous Banach spaces as Banach convolution modules ov er M pGq, Mathematics 10, article 364, 2022

    2022

  17. [23]

    Feichtinger, Sampling via the Banach Gelfand triple

    H.G. Feichtinger, Sampling via the Banach Gelfand triple. Sampling, approxim a- tion, and signal analysis–harmonic analysis in the spirit o f J. Rowland Higgins , Appl. Numer. Harmon. Anal., Birkhäuser, Cham, 211–242, 202 3

  18. [24]

    Feichtinger, The ubiquitous appearance of BUPUs, Harmonic analysis and partial differential equations, Appl

    H.G. Feichtinger, The ubiquitous appearance of BUPUs, Harmonic analysis and partial differential equations, Appl. Numer. Harmon. Anal. , Birkhäuser, Cham, 107–138, 2024

    2024

  19. [25]

    Feichtinger and P

    H.G. Feichtinger and P. Gröbner. Banach spaces of distributions defined by decom- position methods. I . Math. Nachr. 123, 97–120, 1985. 44 H.G. FEICHTINGER, C. RICHARD, C. SCHUMACHER, AND N. STRUN GARU

    1985

  20. [26]

    Feichtinger and K

    H.G. Feichtinger and K. Gröchenig, Iterative reconstruction of multivariate band- limited functions from irregular sampling values , SIAM J. Math. Anal. 23, 244–261, 1992

    1992

  21. [27]

    Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis , Graduate Texts in Mathematics 249, Springer, second edition, 2011

    L. Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis , Graduate Texts in Mathematics 249, Springer, second edition, 2011

    2011

  22. [28]

    Gil de Lamadrid, L.N

    J. Gil de Lamadrid, L.N. Argabright, Almost Periodic Measures , Memoirs of the Amer. Math. Soc. 85, 1990

    1990

  23. [29]

    Hewitt and K.A

    E. Hewitt and K.A. Ross, Abstract Harmonic Analysis. Vol. II: Structure and Analysis for Compact Groups. Analysis on Locally Compact Ab elian Groups. , Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften 152, Springer, New York-Berlin, 1970

    1970

  24. [30]

    Hof, On diffraction by aperiodic structures , Comm

    A. Hof, On diffraction by aperiodic structures , Comm. Math. Phys. 169, 25–43, 1995

    1995

  25. [31]

    Hörmander, The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators

    L. Hörmander, The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators. I. Di stribu- tion Theory and Fourier Analysis , Reprint of the second (1990) edition, Classics in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, 2003

    1990

  26. [32]

    Hörmann, Stochastische Prozesse und Vektorquasimaße , Diplomarbeit Univer- sität Wien, 1987

    W. Hörmann, Stochastische Prozesse und Vektorquasimaße , Diplomarbeit Univer- sität Wien, 1987

    1987

  27. [34]

    Kahane, Sur les fonctions sommes de séries trigonométriques absolu ment con- vergentes, C

    J.P. Kahane, Sur les fonctions sommes de séries trigonométriques absolu ment con- vergentes, C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris 240, 36–37, 1955

    1955

  28. [35]

    Keller and C

    G. Keller and C. Richard, Dynamics on the graph of the torus parametrisation , Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 38, 1048–1085, 2018

    2018

  29. [36]

    Lagarias, Geometric models for quasicrystals I

    J.C. Lagarias, Geometric models for quasicrystals I. Delone sets of finite t ype, Discrete Comput. Geom. 21, 161–191, 1999

    1999

  30. [37]

    Lagarias, Mathematical quasicrystals and the problem of diffraction , in: M

    J.C. Lagarias, Mathematical quasicrystals and the problem of diffraction , in: M. Baake and R.V. Moody (eds.), Directions in Mathematical Quasicrystals , CRM Monogr. Ser. 13, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 61–93, 2000

    2000

  31. [38]

    J.-Y. Lee, D. Lenz, C. Richard, B. Sing and N. Strungaru, Modulated crystals and almost periodic measures, Lett. Math. Phys. 110, 3435–3472, 2020

    2020

  32. [39]

    Lenz, Continuity of eigenfunctions of uniquely ergodic dynamica l systems and intensity of Bragg peaks , Commun

    D. Lenz, Continuity of eigenfunctions of uniquely ergodic dynamica l systems and intensity of Bragg peaks , Commun. Math. Phys. 287, 225–258, 2009

    2009

  33. [40]

    Lenz and C

    D. Lenz and C. Richard, Pure point diffraction and cut and project schemes for measures: the smooth case , Math. Z. 256, 347–378, 2007

    2007

  34. [41]

    D. Lenz, C. Richard and N. Strungaru, Which Meyer sets are regular model sets? A characterization via almost periodicity , preprint, 2024, arXiv:2410.22536v1

    2024 arXiv

  35. [42]

    D. Lenz, T. Spindeler and N. Strungaru, Pure point diffraction and mean, Besicov- itch and Weyl almost periodicity , preprint, 2020, arXiv:2006.10821v1,

    2020 arXiv

  36. [43]

    D. Lenz, T. Spindeler and N. Strungaru, The (reflected) Eberlein convolution of measures, Indag. Math. 35, 959–988, 2024

    2024

  37. [45]

    T.S. Liu, A. van Rooij and J.K. Wang, On some group algebra modules related to the Wiener algebra M1, Pacific J. Math. 55, 507–520, 1974

    1974

  38. [46]

    Loomis, An Introduction to Abstract Harmonic Analysis , D

    L.H. Loomis, An Introduction to Abstract Harmonic Analysis , D. Van Nostrand, Toronto-New York-London, 1953

    1953

  39. [47]

    Matusiak, Gabor frames for model sets , J

    E. Matusiak, Gabor frames for model sets , J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 25, 2570–2607, 2019

    2019

  40. [48]

    Matusiak, Frames of translates for model sets, Appl

    E. Matusiak, Frames of translates for model sets, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 57, 27–57, 2022

    2022

  41. [49]

    Meyer, Quasicrystals, almost periodic patterns, mean-periodic f unctions and irregular sampling, Afr

    Y. Meyer, Quasicrystals, almost periodic patterns, mean-periodic f unctions and irregular sampling, Afr. Diaspora J. Math. 13, 7–45, 2012. TWICE FOURIER TRANSFORMABLE MEASURES 45

    2012

  42. [50]

    Moody and N

    R.V. Moody and N. Strungaru, Almost Periodic Measures and their Fourier Trans- forms, in: [AO2], 173–270, 2017

    2017

  43. [51]

    Osborne, On the Schwartz-Bruhat space and the Pale y-Wiener theorem for locally compact abelian groups, J

    M.S. Osborne, On the Schwartz-Bruhat space and the Pale y-Wiener theorem for locally compact abelian groups, J. Functional Analysis 19, 40–49, 1975

    1975

  44. [52]

    Pogorzelski, C

    F. Pogorzelski, C. Richard, N. Strungaru, Leptin densities in amenable groups , J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 28, Paper No. 85, 2022

    2022

  45. [53]

    Poguntke, Gewisse Segalsche Algebren auf lokalkompakten Gruppen, Arch

    D. Poguntke, Gewisse Segalsche Algebren auf lokalkompakten Gruppen, Arch. Math. 33, 454–460, 1980

    1980

  46. [54]

    Reiter, Classical Harmonic Analysis and Locally Compact Groups , Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1968

    H. Reiter, Classical Harmonic Analysis and Locally Compact Groups , Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1968

    1968

  47. [55]

    Reiter, L1-algebras and Segal algebras , Lecture Notes in Mathematics 31, Springer, Berlin, 1971

    H. Reiter, L1-algebras and Segal algebras , Lecture Notes in Mathematics 31, Springer, Berlin, 1971

    1971

  48. [56]

    Reiter and J.D

    H. Reiter and J.D. Stegeman, Classical Harmonic Analysis and Locally Compact Groups, second edition, London Mathematical Society Monographs, New Series 22, Clarendon Press, New York, 2000

    2000

  49. [57]

    Richard, Mild distributions in diffraction theory , in: Report on the workshop Aspects of Aperiodic order , MFO Report 37/23, 26–28, 2023

    C. Richard, Mild distributions in diffraction theory , in: Report on the workshop Aspects of Aperiodic order , MFO Report 37/23, 26–28, 2023

    2023

  50. [58]

    Richard and C

    C. Richard and C. Schumacher, On sampling and interpolation by model sets , J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 26, paper no. 39, 2020

    2020

  51. [59]

    Richard and N

    C. Richard and N. Strungaru, Pure point diffraction and Poisson Summation , Ann. H. Poincaré 18, 3903–3931, 2017

    2017

  52. [60]

    Richard and N

    C. Richard and N. Strungaru, A short guide to pure point diffraction in cut-and- project sets, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50, 154003, 2017

    2017

  53. [61]

    Rudin, Non-analytic functions of absolutely convergent Fourier s eries, Proc

    W. Rudin, Non-analytic functions of absolutely convergent Fourier s eries, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sc. U.S.A. 41, 238–240, 1955

    1955

  54. [62]

    Rudin, Real and Complex Analysis , McGraw–Hill, Singapore, 1987

    W. Rudin, Real and Complex Analysis , McGraw–Hill, Singapore, 1987

    1987

  55. [63]

    Rudin, Functional Analysis, McGraw–Hill, Singapore, 1991

    W. Rudin, Functional Analysis, McGraw–Hill, Singapore, 1991

    1991

  56. [64]

    Ryan, Introduction to Tensor Products of Banach Spaces , Springer, London, 2002

    R.A. Ryan, Introduction to Tensor Products of Banach Spaces , Springer, London, 2002

    2002

  57. [65]

    Schaefer, Topological Vector Spaces, Springer, New York, 1971

    H.H. Schaefer, Topological Vector Spaces, Springer, New York, 1971

    1971

  58. [66]

    Schlottmann, Generalized model sets and dynamical systems , in: M

    M. Schlottmann, Generalized model sets and dynamical systems , in: M. Baake and R.V. Moody (eds.), Directions in Mathematical Quasicrystals , CRM Monogr. Ser. 13, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 143–159, 2000

    2000

  59. [67]

    Schwartz, Radon Measures on Arbitrary Topological Spaces and Cylindrical Mea- sures, Tata Institute Monographs on Mathematics & Physics, Oxfor d University Press, Oxford, 1974

    L. Schwartz, Radon Measures on Arbitrary Topological Spaces and Cylindrical Mea- sures, Tata Institute Monographs on Mathematics & Physics, Oxfor d University Press, Oxford, 1974

    1974

  60. [68]

    Strungaru, Almost periodic pure point measures , in: [AO2], 271–342, 2017

    N. Strungaru, Almost periodic pure point measures , in: [AO2], 271–342, 2017

    2017

  61. [69]

    Strungaru, On the Fourier transformability of strongly almost periodi c measures, Canad

    N. Strungaru, On the Fourier transformability of strongly almost periodi c measures, Canad. J. Math. 72, 900–927, 2020

    2020

  62. [70]

    Strungaru and V

    N. Strungaru and V. Terauds, Diffraction theory and almost periodic distributions , Journal of Statistical Physics 164, 1183–1216, 2016

    2016

  63. [71]

    Tréves, Topological Vector Spaces, Distributions and Kernels , Academic Press, New York, 1967

    F. Tréves, Topological Vector Spaces, Distributions and Kernels , Academic Press, New York, 1967

    1967

  64. [72]

    Simon Stoilow

    N. Wiener, The Fourier Integral and Certain of its Applications , Dover Publica- tions, New York, 1959. 46 H.G. FEICHTINGER, C. RICHARD, C. SCHUMACHER, AND N. STRUN GARU H.G. Feichtinger, F aculty of Ma thema tics, University of Vienna and Acous- tic Research Institute ARI Vie...

    1959

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.