Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 49 references

Rough or crumpled: Strong coupling phases of a generalized Kardar-Parisi-Zhang surface

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A generalized KPZ surface equation has two strong-coupling phases, one rough and one crumpled.

desk verdict First serious strong-coupling analysis of the G-KPZ equation, but the crumpled-phase claim rests on an MCT branch mistake that punches a hole in the quoted interval. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15026 v3 pith:HX5TPSXD submitted 2024-11-22 cond-mat.stat-mech

Debayan Jana , Abhik Basu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mech MSC 82C2882C31
keywords generalizedKPZequationnonlocalnonlinearityroughnessexponentcrumpledphasestrong-couplingnonuniversalscalingrougheningtransitionmode-couplingtheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies a generalized Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation for growing surfaces that adds a nonlocal nonlinearity to the usual local one. In two dimensions the authors argue that the strong-coupling regime, which ordinary perturbative renormalization cannot reach, splits into two distinct phases: an algebraically rough phase with $0<\chi(\gamma)<1$ and a crumpled phase with $\chi(\gamma)>1$. The roughness exponent $\chi$ is a continuous function of the nonlinearity ratio $\gamma=\lambda_1/\lambda$, so scaling is nonuniversal and governed by a fixed line rather than isolated fixed points. This matters because the standard two-dimensional KPZ equation has no roughening transition, while this generalized model predicts one, and because the crumpled phase signals a genuine breakdown of the height-gradient description.

What carries the argument

The central object is the generalized KPZ equation (2), whose nonlocal vertex is built from the longitudinal projection operator $Q_{ij}(\mathbf{k})=k_ik_j/k^2$, so that the second nonlinearity is nonlocal in $\nabla h$. A pseudo-Galilean invariance fixes $\chi+z=2$ exactly in the strong-coupling phases. The argument then runs through two linked calculations: a one-loop dynamic renormalization-group flow that locates the perturbatively unstable region between the separatrices $g_2=0.161\sqrt{g}$ and $g_2=-1.383\sqrt{g}$, and a one-loop mode-coupling theory (MCT) that computes the zero-frequency self-energy and correlation-function amplitudes and equates the universal amplitude ratio $\Gamma^2/(\lambda^2 D)$ obtained from the two sets of one-loop diagrams. Equating the two expressions yields a quadratic equation for $\chi$; the branch $\chi_+$ is selected because it reduces to the known KPZ result $\chi=1/3$ at $\gamma=0$ in two dimensions, and it produces Eq. (15). The continuous $\gamma$-dependence of $\chi$ rests on the absence of vertex renormalization at one loop, which keeps $\gamma$ marginal and makes a fixed line, not a fixed point, characterize the rough phase.

What would settle it

Run pseudospectral simulations of Eq. (2) in two dimensions for several $\gamma$ values in $(-1.383,0.161)$, measure the height-difference structure factor at long times to extract $\chi(\gamma)$, and look for the predicted divergence of $\langle(\nabla h)^2\rangle$ for $\gamma$ in $(-1.043,-0.142)$. The central claim fails if $\chi$ does not vary continuously with $\gamma$, or if the surface variance does not grow as $L^{2\chi}$ with $\chi>1$ in the alleged crumpled interval.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that the strong-coupling phase of the generalized KPZ equation in $d=2$ is not uniform. For $-1.383<\gamma<0.161$ with $\gamma=\lambda_1/\lambda$, the surface is algebraically rough with $0<\chi<1$; within that interval, for $-1.043<\gamma<-0.142$, the predicted $\chi$ exceeds one, which makes $\langle(\nabla h)^2\rangle$ grow with system size and identifies a crumpled phase with positional and orientational short-range order. In the rough phase the surface has orientational long-range order and positional short-range order, and the exponents $\chi(\gamma)$ and $z(\gamma)=2-\chi(\gamma)$ vary continuously with $\gamma$, with $\chi$ given by $\chi=(-18\gamma^2-22\gamma+4)/(36\gamma^2+42\gamma+12)$. The same one-loop mode-coupling construction applied in $d=3$ yields the same rough-versus-crumpled structure, and the authors argue by extension that it holds for all $d>2$.

Load-bearing premise

The whole prediction stands on two linked assumptions: the bare nonlinearity ratio $\gamma=\lambda_1/\lambda$ never renormalizes, even at higher loop orders, and the one-loop mode-coupling calculation with Lorentzian correlation shapes captures the true strong-coupling physics.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In two dimensions the generalized model admits a roughening transition between a logarithmically rough weak-coupling phase and an algebraically rough strong-coupling phase, behavior the pure two-dimensional KPZ equation does not exhibit.
  • In the algebraically rough phase the scaling exponents vary continuously with the nonlinearity ratio $\gamma$, so the model family displays nonuniversal, parameter-dependent scaling rather than isolated universality classes.
  • For $\gamma$ inside the predicted crumpled interval, the mean-square height gradient diverges with system size, and the paper concludes that higher-order nonlinear terms absent from Eq. (2) become relevant at the crumpling threshold.
  • The exact relation $\chi+z=2$ ties the dynamic exponent to the roughness exponent, so both exponents are nonuniversal together in the rough phase.
  • In $d>2$ the same two-phase structure appears, including ranges where the roughening transition is directly from a smooth phase to a crumpled phase.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the fixed-line picture survives higher-order corrections, this model would be one of the rare nonequilibrium surface problems with continuously tunable scaling exponents, and any numerical test should report $\chi$ as a function of $\gamma$ rather than a single exponent.
  • The paper's own caveat is the sharpest test: unequal infinite renormalizations of $\lambda$ and $\lambda_1$ at higher loop order would replace the fixed line by isolated fixed points, so a two-loop or nonperturbative calculation of the flow of $\gamma$ would decide between continuous and discrete exponents.
  • Before the crumpled phase itself is probed, the sign change of the effective diffusion coefficient $\nu_e$ at $\gamma\simeq-1.25$ and $\gamma\simeq0$ offers a cleaner early-warning observable, since a negative $\nu_e$ at large scales is the physical mechanism the paper associates with crumpling.
  • The orientational-order language invites a direct comparison with membrane crumpling: if the nonlocal term acts as an effective bending stiffness, adding chiral or conserving terms, as the paper suggests, should push the crumple boundary to larger $|\gamma|$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a generalized Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation that adds a nonlocal nonlinearity proportional to lambda_1 to the usual local KPZ nonlinearity. Using a one-loop dynamic RG and a one-loop self-consistent mode-coupling theory (MCT), it claims that in two dimensions the strong-coupling regime splits into an algebraically rough phase with 0<chi(gamma)<1 and a crumpled phase with chi(gamma)>1, where gamma=lambda_1/lambda and chi is given by Eq. (15). The rough phase is predicted to have nonuniversal, continuously varying exponents, orientational long-range order and positional short-range order, while the crumpled phase has short-range order in both. The paper also extends these predictions to d>2 and speculates on the global RG fixed-point structure.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper would meaningfully extend the KPZ paradigm by showing that competing local and nonlocal nonlinearities can produce strong-coupling phases with nonuniversal scaling and a crumpled phase. Several elements are done carefully and are strengths: the pseudo-Galilean transformation is explicit and yields the exact relation chi+z=2; the one-loop MCT algebra is presented in enough detail in the Supplemental Material to be checked by the reader; and the gamma=0 limit reproduces the known KPZ MCT value chi=1/3 in 2D, providing a useful internal consistency check. However, the quantitative evidence for the 2D crumpled phase is weakened by a sign/branch error in the selected MCT root, and the continuously varying nonuniversal exponents rest on the unproven exact marginality of gamma. These issues are load-bearing for the paper's headline predictions.

major comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (15) and Fig. 1(a)] The selected root chi=chi+ is not positive on the whole claimed crumpled interval. With d=2, A(gamma)=36gamma^2+42gamma+12 vanishes at gamma=-2/3 and -1/2 and is negative between those roots, while B(gamma)=18gamma^2+22gamma-4 is negative throughout (-1.383,0.161). On the subinterval (-2/3,-1/2), the quadratic (13) with C=0 has roots 0 and -B/A<0, so there is no positive-chi MCT solution; Eq. (15) itself gives chi=-44.7 at gamma=-0.6. The paper's own validity condition, stated just before Eq. (15) as 'B<0 and A>0, or B>0 and A<0', is violated in this band. Consequently, setting chi=1 in Eq. (15) supports crumpling only in the two disjoint bands (-1.043,-2/3) and (-1/2,-0.142), separated by a band with no positive-chi MCT solution. The continuous purple crumpled region in Fig. 1(a) and the abstract's statement of a 2D crumpled phase therefore need correction.
  2. [Final paragraph and central claim of nonuniversality] The continuously varying nonuniversal exponents chi(gamma) in the rough phase depend on gamma=lambda_1/lambda being exactly marginal at all loop orders. The one-loop RG shows no vertex corrections, but the paper explicitly states that unequal higher-loop renormalizations of lambda and lambda_1 would make gamma flow and replace the fixed line by isolated fixed points. Because the abstract and opening sections present nonuniversal scaling as an established result, the manuscript should either provide an argument for exact marginality or clearly label this as a conjecture at every point where it is used, rather than only in the closing paragraph.
  3. [Eq. (7) and MCT comparison] The independent support for the crumpled phase comes from the bare-perturbation condition (7), which gives -1.25<gamma<0. After correcting the sign issue in Eq. (15), the MCT and bare-perturbation intervals do not coincide, and the invalid band (-2/3,-1/2) lies inside the bare-perturbation region but has no positive-chi MCT solution. The text says the two methods 'come to a similar conclusion', but this agreement is not obvious once the MCT interval is redrawn. The authors should state the corrected MCT interval, compare it explicitly with Eq. (7), and discuss whether the 2D crumpled phase is robust or an artifact of the one-loop Lorentzian closure.
  4. [MCT closure assumptions] The MCT derivation assumes Lorentzian correlation functions, dominance of one-loop diagrams, and z<2 with chi>0; these assumptions are uncontrolled in the strong-coupling regime. Since the known MCT predictions for pure KPZ in d>2 disagree with several numerical studies cited in the introduction, the paper should state more prominently that the quantitative predictions for the rough and crumpled phases inherit this uncontrolled approximation. This is a caveat rather than a fatal defect, but it should accompany the central claims.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (14) and following line] The expression chi = -B + |B|/(2A) is ambiguous; it should be written as (-B+|B|)/(2A) for both chi+ and chi-.
  2. [Fig. 1(c)] Figure 1(c) should mark the interval (-2/3,-1/2) where Eq. (15) has no positive-chi solution instead of drawing a single central crumpled region.
  3. [Text near Eq. (15)] The sentence 'as A, depending upon gamma, decreases, chi grows, eventually exceeding unity' is valid only where A>0; it fails where A changes sign. This wording should be revised together with the corrected interval.
  4. [Higher-dimensional discussion] The statement that chi>1 implies crumpling in d>2 is subject to the same sign-selection issue as in 2D; the corresponding gamma intervals should be rederived using the positivity conditions on the coefficients of the quadratic for each d.
  5. [Fig. 2 caption] The 'Occam's razor' global flow diagram is clearly speculative, but the caption should state explicitly that the fixed lines and fixed points in the strong-coupling region are conjectured and not derived from the calculations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the nonuniversal exponents are derived from a one-loop MCT self-consistency condition, not fitted, and the self-cited model/RG input is rederived in the supplement.

full rationale

The central derivation is not circular. The nonuniversal roughness exponent chi(gamma) is obtained by writing the universal amplitude ratio Gamma^2/(lambda^2 D) from two independent one-loop MCT routes, the zero-frequency self-energy (Eq. 11) and the zero-frequency correlation function (Eq. 12), setting them equal, and solving the resulting quadratic (Eqs. 13-15). gamma is the bare ratio lambda_1/lambda, a model input; it is not adjusted to reproduce chi, and the branch chi = chi_+ is anchored by the known gamma = 0 limit chi = 1/3 for 2D KPZ from the literature (Ref. [9]), not by the target phase. Although the model and one-loop RG flows originate in Ref. [34] by overlapping authors, the Supplemental Material rederives the pseudo-Galilean invariance and the RG flow equations (Eqs. 24-29), so the self-citation is not the sole support for the load-bearing input. The rough/crumpled distinction is a threshold consequence of chi crossing 1, not an assumed output. The paper explicitly flags the unproven exact marginality of gamma in the closing paragraph ('We are unable to speculate whether this result is protected by any hidden symmetry...'); that is a limitation, not a circular reduction. The reviewer's sign/branch concern about A < 0 on part of the claimed crumpled interval is a potential correctness defect in the MCT solution, but it does not constitute a circular reduction. No step equates the prediction to the input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central predictions rest on the input ratio gamma, the scaling and one-loop approximations of MCT, and the unproven exact marginality of gamma. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • gamma = lambda_1/lambda
    Ratio of nonlocal to local nonlinearity coefficients. The predicted exponents chi(gamma) and z(gamma) depend continuously on this input parameter, which is not fixed by the theory. It is a physical model parameter, not fitted to data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Pseudo-Galilean invariance of the G-KPZ equation, yielding the exact identity chi + z = 2.
    Derived in the Supplemental Material; used to evaluate MCT integrals and to close the equation for chi.
  • domain assumption Scaling hypothesis for correlation and response functions in the long-wavelength limit.
    The MCT calculation assumes C(k,omega) and G(k,omega) take the scaling forms in Eqs. (8)-(10).
  • domain assumption One-loop dominance and Lorentzian approximation for the correlation function.
    The amplitude ratio Gamma^2/(lambda^2 D) is computed from one-loop diagrams only, with the Lorentzian C(k,omega), and any higher-loop or non-Lorentzian corrections are neglected without error estimate.
  • ad hoc to paper The ratio gamma = lambda_1/lambda is exactly marginal, i.e., not renormalized at any loop order.
    The nonuniversal exponents parametrized by the bare gamma are physical fixed-point exponents only if gamma does not flow. The authors state this is not proven and could fail at higher loops.
  • domain assumption chi > 1 implies a crumpled phase with both positional and orientational short-range order, despite the breakdown of Eq. (2).
    The model equation is invalid for chi > 1, so the identification of the crumpled phase is an extrapolation beyond the theory's range of validity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rough or crumpled: Strong coupling phases of a generalized Kardar-Parisi-Zhang surface." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HX5TPSXD

@misc{pith2026241115026,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rough or crumpled: Strong coupling phases of a generalized Kardar-Parisi-Zhang surface},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HX5TPSXD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15026}
}
read the original abstract

We study a generalized Kardar-Parisi-Zhang (KPZ) equation [Jana et al., Phys. Rev. E 109, L032104 (2024)] that sets the paradigm for universality in roughening of growing nonequilibrium surfaces without any conservation laws but with competing local and nonlocal nonlinear effects. This equation in two dimensions exhibits two distinct strong coupling regimes: a rough phase and a crumpled phase, in addition to a weak coupling phase. The conformation fluctuations of such a rough surface are given by nonuniversal scaling exponents, with orientational long-range order and positional short-range order, whereas the crumpled phase has positional and orientational short-range order.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.15026 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Phases and the RG flow lines in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Conjectured “Occam’s razor” global RG flows in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Schematic phase diagram together with RG flow lines [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. One-loop Feynman diagrams that contribute to the zero frequency self energy. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. One-loop Feynman diagrams that contribute to the zero frequency correlation function. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Dynamic scaling of growing interfaces,

    M. Kardar, G. Parisi, and Yi-C. Zhang, “Dynamic scaling of growing interfaces,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 889 (1986)

    work page 1986

  2. [2]

    Origins of scale invariance in growth pro- cesses,

    J. Krug, “Origins of scale invariance in growth pro- cesses,” Adv. Phys. 46, 139 (1997)

    work page 1997

  3. [3]

    Barab´ asi and H

    A.-L. Barab´ asi and H. E. Stanley, Fractal Concepts in Surface Growth (Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, England, 1995)

    work page 1995

  4. [4]

    The surface statis- tics of a granular aggregate,

    S. F. Edwards and D. R. Wilkinson, “The surface statis- tics of a granular aggregate,” Proc. R. Soc. London A 381, 17 (1982)

    work page 1982

  5. [5]

    U. C. T¨ auber, Critical Dynamics: A Field Theory Ap- proach to Equilibrium and Non-Equilibrium Scaling Be- havior (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Eng- land, 2014)

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Nelson, T

    D. Nelson, T. Piran, and S. Weinberg, Statistical Me- chanics of Membranes and Surfaces (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989)

    work page 1989

  7. [7]

    Exact re- sults for the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation with spatially correlated noise,

    H. K. Janssen, U. C. T¨ auber, and E. Frey, “Exact re- sults for the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation with spatially correlated noise,” Eur. Phys. J. B 9, 491 (1999)

    work page 1999

  8. [8]

    Self-consistent ap- proach to the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation,

    J. P. Bouchaud and M. E. Cates, “Self-consistent ap- proach to the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation,” Phys. Rev. E 47, R1455 (1993)

    work page 1993

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Upper critical dimension of the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation,

    J. K. Bhattacharjee, “Upper critical dimension of the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation,” J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 31, L93 (1998)

    1998

  2. [10]

    Exact scaling function of interface growth dynamics,

    T. Hwa and E. Frey, “Exact scaling function of interface growth dynamics,” Phys. Rev. A 44, R7873 (1991)

    1991

  3. [11]

    Generalizations of the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation,

    J. P. Doherty, M. A. Moore, J. M. Kim, and A. J. Bray, “Generalizations of the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2041 (1994)

    1994

  4. [12]

    Absence of finite upper critical dimension in the spherical Kardar-Parisi-Zhang model,

    Y. Tu, “Absence of finite upper critical dimension in the spherical Kardar-Parisi-Zhang model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3109 (1994)

    1994

  5. [13]

    Disorder-induced roughening of di- verse manifolds,

    T. Halpin-Healy, “Disorder-induced roughening of di- verse manifolds,” Phys. Rev. A 42, 711 (1990)

    1990

  6. [14]

    J. K. Bhattacharjee and S. Bhattacharyya,Nonlinear Dy- namics Near and Far from Equilibrium(Springer, New York, 2007)

    2007

  7. [15]

    Novel universality classes of cou- pled driven diffusive systems,

    A. Basu and E. Frey, “Novel universality classes of cou- pled driven diffusive systems,” Phys. Rev. E 69, 015101 (R) (2004)

    2004

  8. [16]

    Scaling and universality in coupled driven diffusive models,

    A. Basu and E. Frey, “Scaling and universality in coupled driven diffusive models,” J. Stat. Mech. 2009, P08013 (2009)

    2009

  9. [17]

    Nonperturbative renormalization group for the Kardar- Parisi-Zhang equation,

    L. Canet, H. Chat´ e, B. Delamotte, and N. Wschebor, “Nonperturbative renormalization group for the Kardar- Parisi-Zhang equation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 150601 (2010)

    2010

  10. [18]

    Localized growth modes, dynamic tex- tures, and upper critical dimension for the Kardar-Parisi- Zhang equation in the weak-noise limit,

    H. C. Fogedby, “Localized growth modes, dynamic tex- tures, and upper critical dimension for the Kardar-Parisi- Zhang equation in the weak-noise limit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 195702 (2005)

    2005

  11. [19]

    Upper critical dimension, dynamic exponent, and scaling functions in the mode- coupling theory for the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation,

    F. Colaiori and M. A. Moore, “Upper critical dimension, dynamic exponent, and scaling functions in the mode- coupling theory for the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3946 (2001)

    2001

  12. [20]

    Universality classes of the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation,

    L. Canet and M. A. Moore, “Universality classes of the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 200602 (2007)

    2007

  13. [21]

    Dynamical uni- versality classes of simple growth and lattice gas models,

    J. Kelling, G. ´Odor, and S. Gemming, “Dynamical uni- versality classes of simple growth and lattice gas models,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51, 035003 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    Extremal paths, the stochastic heat equation, and the three-dimensional Kardar-Parisi- Zhang universality class,

    T. Halpin-Healy, “Extremal paths, the stochastic heat equation, and the three-dimensional Kardar-Parisi- Zhang universality class,” Phys. Rev. E 88, 042118 (2013)

    2013

  15. [23]

    Numerical estimate of the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang universality class in (2+1) dimen- sions,

    A. Pagnani and G. Parisi, “Numerical estimate of the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang universality class in (2+1) dimen- sions,” Phys. Rev. E 92, 010101 (2015)

    2015

  16. [24]

    Upper critical dimension of the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation,

    M. Schwartz and E. Perlsman, “Upper critical dimension of the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation,” Phys. Rev. E 85, 050103 (2012)

    2012

  17. [25]

    Multisurface coding simula- tions of the restricted solid-on-solid model in four dimen- sions,

    A. Pagnani and G. Parisi, “Multisurface coding simula- tions of the restricted solid-on-solid model in four dimen- sions,” Phys. Rev. E 87, 010102 (2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    Restricted solid-on-solid model with a proper restriction parameter n in 4 + 1 dimensions,

    J. M. Kim and S. W. Kim, “Restricted solid-on-solid model with a proper restriction parameter n in 4 + 1 dimensions,” Phys. Rev. E 88, 034102 (2013)

    2013

  19. [27]

    Univer- sality of fluctuations in the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang class in high dimensions and its upper critical dimension,

    S. G. Alves, T. J. Oliveira, and S. C. Ferreira, “Univer- sality of fluctuations in the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang class in high dimensions and its upper critical dimension,” Phys. Rev. E 90, 020103 (2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    Kardar-Parisi-Zhang growth in ε di- mensions and beyond,

    T. Halpin-Healy, “Kardar-Parisi-Zhang growth in ε di- mensions and beyond,” Phys. Rev. E111, 014147 (2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    A KPZ Cocktail- Shaken, not Stirred

    T. Halpin-Healy and K. A. Takeuchi, “A KPZ Cocktail- Shaken, not Stirred...” J. Stat. Phys. 160, 794 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    Eden model with non- local growth rules and kinetic roughening in biological systems,

    S. N. Santalla and S. C. Ferreira, “Eden model with non- local growth rules and kinetic roughening in biological systems,” Phys. Rev. E 98, 022405 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    Growth of correlated pore-scale structures in sedimentary rocks: A dynamical model,

    E. Aharonov and D. H. Rothman, “Growth of correlated pore-scale structures in sedimentary rocks: A dynamical model,” J. Geophys. Res. 101, 2973 (1996)

    1996

  24. [32]

    Kinetic roughening of Laplacian fronts,

    J. Krug and P. Meakin, “Kinetic roughening of Laplacian fronts,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 703 (1991)

    1991

  25. [33]

    Unstable non- local interface dynamics,

    M. Nicoli, R. Cuerno, and M. Castro, “Unstable non- local interface dynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 256102 (2009)

    2009

  26. [34]

    Logarithmic or al- gebraic: Roughening of an active Kardar-Parisi-Zhang surface,

    D. Jana, A. Haldar, and A. Basu, “Logarithmic or al- gebraic: Roughening of an active Kardar-Parisi-Zhang surface,” Phys. Rev. E 109, L032104 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    See Supplemental Material for the intermediate calcu- lational details, which includes Refs. [5, 34, 46, 47]

    “See Supplemental Material for the intermediate calcu- lational details, which includes Refs. [5, 34, 46, 47].”

  28. [36]

    Large- distance and long-time properties of a randomly stirred fluid,

    D. Forster, D. R. Nelson, and M. J. Stephen, “Large- distance and long-time properties of a randomly stirred fluid,” Phys. Rev. A 16, 732 (1977)

    1977

  29. [37]

    Coupled nonequilibrium growth equations: Self- consistent mode coupling using vertex renormalization,

    A. K. Chattopadhyay, A. Basu, and J. K. Bhattachar- jee, “Coupled nonequilibrium growth equations: Self- consistent mode coupling using vertex renormalization,” Phys. Rev. E 61, 2086 (2000)

    2000

  30. [38]

    Statistical properties of driven magnetohydro- 7 dynamic turbulence in three dimensions: Novel univer- sality,

    A. Basu, “Statistical properties of driven magnetohydro- 7 dynamic turbulence in three dimensions: Novel univer- sality,” Europhys. Lett. 65, 505 (2004)

    2004

  31. [39]

    Universal properties of three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic turbulence: Do Alfv´ en waves matter?

    A. Basu and J. K. Bhattacharjee, “Universal properties of three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic turbulence: Do Alfv´ en waves matter?” J. Stat. Mech.2005, P07002 (2005)

    2005

  32. [40]

    Statisti- cal mechanics of asymmetric tethered membranes: Spiral and crumpled phases,

    T. Banerjee, N. Sarkar, J. Toner, and A. Basu, “Statisti- cal mechanics of asymmetric tethered membranes: Spiral and crumpled phases,” Phys. Rev. E 99, 053004 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    Statistical mechanics of phase transitions in elastic media with vanishing ther- mal expansion,

    S. Mukherjee and A. Basu, “Statistical mechanics of phase transitions in elastic media with vanishing ther- mal expansion,” Phys. Rev. E 106, 054128 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    Rough or crumpled: Phases in kinetic growth with surface relaxation,

    S. Mukherjee and A. Basu, “Rough or crumpled: Phases in kinetic growth with surface relaxation,” Phys. Rev. E 106, L022102 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    Multi- scaling in models of magnetohydrodynamic turbulence,

    A. Basu, A. Sain, S. K. Dhar, and R. Pandit, “Multi- scaling in models of magnetohydrodynamic turbulence,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2687 (1998)

    1998

  36. [44]

    Nonperturbative renormalization group for the Kardar- Parisi-Zhang equation: General framework and first ap- plications,

    L. Canet, H. Chat´ e, B. Delamotte, and N. Wschebor, “Nonperturbative renormalization group for the Kardar- Parisi-Zhang equation: General framework and first ap- plications,” Phys. Rev. E 84, 061128 (2011)

    2011

  37. [45]

    General frame- work of the non-perturbative renormalization group for non-equilibrium steady states,

    L. Canet, H. Chat´ e, and B. Delamotte, “General frame- work of the non-perturbative renormalization group for non-equilibrium steady states,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 44 (2011)

    2011

  38. [46]

    Renormal- ized field theory of critical dynamics,

    R. Bausch, H. K. Janssen, and H. Wagner, “Renormal- ized field theory of critical dynamics,” Z. Phys. B 24, 113 (1976)

    1976

  39. [47]

    Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory,

    V. Yakhot and S. A. Orszag, “Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory,” J. Sci. Comput. 1, 3 (1986). 8 Supplemental Material for “Rough or crumpled: Strong coupling phases of a generalized Kardar-Parisi-Zhang surface” I. GALILEAN INV ARIANCE We rewrite the...

    1986

  40. [48]

    (41) After performing the Ω-integral, we get I = 4λ2 1D Γ kikjkn k2 Z q qiqm(k − q)j(q − k)m(q − k)nq−2χ−d (q − k)2(qz + |k − q|z)

    with a symmetry factor of 8 and contributes I = λ2 1 2! 8 Z q,Ω kikj k2 qi(k − q)j (q − k)m(q − k)n (q − k)2 qmknC(q, Ω) × G(k − q, −Ω) = 4λ2 1kikjkn k2 Z q,Ω qiqm(k − q)j(q − k)m(q − k)n 1 (q − k)2 × 2DΓq−2χ−d+z (Ω2 + Γ2q2z) × 1 iΩ + Γ|k − q|z . (41) After performing the Ω-in...

  41. [49]

    Evaluating it at zero frequency, we get −2 × λ2 1 2! × 2 1 Γ2k2z kikjkmkn k4 Z q,Ω qi(k − q)jqm(q − k)n × 4D2Γ2q−4χ−2d+2z Ω2 + Γ2q2z 2

    with a symmetry factor of 2. Evaluating it at zero frequency, we get −2 × λ2 1 2! × 2 1 Γ2k2z kikjkmkn k4 Z q,Ω qi(k − q)jqm(q − k)n × 4D2Γ2q−4χ−2d+2z Ω2 + Γ2q2z 2 . (68) Using, R Ω 1 Ω2+Γ2q2z 2 = 1 4Γ3q3z , above integral reduces to 8λ2 1D2Γ2 4Γ5k2z × kikjkmkn k4 Z q qiqjqmqn...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.