Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 46 references

One-loop integrability with shifting masses

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Any theory with a tree-level elastic Lagrangian of type (2.1) is also purely elastic at one loop.

desk verdict A genuine extension of the one-loop integrability program to mass-shifting theories; the central theorem is almost certainly right, though the proof leans on prior identities that deserve a closer look. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15080 v2 pith:OGB6JSQA submitted 2024-11-22 hep-th

Matheus Fabri , Davide Polvara This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords one-loopintegrabilitypurelyelasticscatteringaffineTodatheoriesmassrenormalizationS-matrixbootstraptwo-dimensionalquantumfieldtheoryLandausingularitiestree-levelelasticity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper answers a question about integrable quantum field theories in 1+1 dimensions: if a theory's tree-level scattering is purely elastic (the outgoing particles are always the same types as the incoming ones, with no particle production), does that property survive one loop? The authors show that it does, for any theory with a Lagrangian of the polynomial-like form (2.1). The subtlety is that the physical, renormalized masses must be allowed to shift away from the classical masses by one-loop bubble corrections, and the shifts can be arbitrary; no condition on the mass ratios is needed. The one-loop S-matrix is then completely determined by tree-level S-matrices through a universal formula, and the paper verifies this formula against the bootstrapped S-matrices of all nonsimply-laced affine Toda theories.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is an identity, quoted from [5], that sums every connected one-loop inelastic diagram together with two-point counterterms and equates the result to the sum over masses of $\delta m_k^2\, \partial M^{(0)}_{\text{inelastic}}/\partial \mu_k^2$ evaluated on shell (equation (2.7)). Because this derivative, combined with the coupling counterterms, is exactly the first-order expansion of the tree-level amplitude when the masses and couplings are shifted from renormalized back to classical values, the whole one-loop inelastic amplitude collapses to the tree-level amplitude at classical parameters, which vanishes by tree-level elasticity. For elastic processes the same machinery produces the universal one-loop S-matrix formula (2.31)/(2.34), expressed solely through tree-level S-matrices. The check on nonsimply-laced affine Toda theories uses their tree-level elastic S-matrices together with the one-loop mass shifts collected in appendix C.

What would settle it

Compute a one-loop inelastic amplitude directly from Feynman diagrams in a specific tree-level elastic model with unequal mass shifts, renormalize masses through (2.4), and check whether the amplitude vanishes without invoking identity (2.7); a single nonzero result would falsify the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that any theory with a Lagrangian of type (2.1) that is purely elastic at the tree level is also purely elastic at one loop. The renormalized masses $\hat m_a$ are defined through $m_a^2 = \hat m_a^2 + \delta m_a^2$, where $\delta m_a^2$ are the one-loop bubble corrections; once amplitudes are expanded around these physical masses, every one-loop inelastic amplitude becomes an evaluation of the tree-level amplitude at the classical masses and couplings, where it vanishes by assumption. This extends earlier results that required mass ratios to be unaffected by one-loop corrections. For elastic processes, the one-loop S-matrix is given by the universal expression (2.31)/(2.34) in terms of tree-level S-matrices, and applying it to nonsimply-laced affine Toda theories reproduces the S-matrices bootstrapped in [6] and [7].

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands on a quoted identity saying that the sum of all one-loop inelastic diagrams plus two-point counterterms is the derivative of the tree-level amplitude with respect to mass shifts; if that identity fails for some tree-level elastic Lagrangian of type (2.1), the conclusion that one-loop inelastic amplitudes vanish would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • One-loop inelastic processes, including production amplitudes with more than four external legs, vanish in every tree-level elastic theory of this class once masses are renormalized as in (2.4).
  • The one-loop S-matrix of such a theory is a universal function of its tree-level S-matrices, with no explicit dependence on the mass shifts $\delta m_a^2$.
  • Classical mass ratios need not be preserved by quantum corrections; the physical masses may be coupling-dependent without destroying integrability at one loop.
  • Applying the formula to nonsimply-laced affine Toda theories reproduces the previously bootstrapped S-matrices, providing a perturbative confirmation of those exact results to one loop.
  • Landau double poles that appear in one-loop inelastic amplitudes are controlled by the mass shifts and cancel in the full amplitude against the expansion of the tree-level amplitude around the classical masses.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The argument suggests that at each loop order the inelastic amplitude should be expressible as a total variation of the tree amplitude with respect to masses and couplings, so a recursive proof of all-order elasticity might be possible if the analogous two-loop identity holds.
  • The result implies that quantum integrability, at least at one loop, imposes no constraint on how masses renormalize; constraints would have to come from higher loops or from requirements such as unitarity and crossing beyond one loop.
  • One could test the universality of (2.34) on a new tree-level elastic model with a non-Toda Lagrangian, computing the one-loop S-matrix directly and comparing with the formula.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies two-dimensional massive bosonic quantum field theories of the form (2.1) that are purely elastic at tree level. Its central claim is that any such theory is also purely elastic at one loop, provided the physical renormalized masses are defined through one-loop bubble corrections, and that the one-loop S-matrix is given by the universal expression (2.31)/(2.34) in terms of tree-level S-matrices, thereby extending the results of [1,5] to models in which mass ratios receive arbitrary one-loop corrections. The paper further analyzes double poles in one-loop inelastic amplitudes, showing that Landau singularities are encoded in the mass shifts and cancel in the total amplitude through the tree-level expansion around classical masses. These results are then applied to the full class of nonsimply-laced affine Toda theories, with the claim that the one-loop S-matrices obtained from formula (3.9) exactly match the bootstrapped S-matrices of [6,7].

Significance. If the central theorem is correct, it is a substantial and clean result: it removes the earlier restriction to mass-ratio-preserving one-loop corrections and provides a parameter-free universal formula for one-loop S-matrices of a large class of two-dimensional theories. The paper also gives explicit nontrivial evidence, including a Landau-pole calculation in Section 3.3 that checks the singular structure of one-loop inelastic amplitudes against direct Feynman-diagram analysis, and a systematic-looking comparison with the nonsimply-laced affine Toda bootstrap. The appendices contain useful explicit data for mass shifts and couplings. The main weakness is that the proof relies on identities imported from the authors' prior work without rederivation in the new, more general setting; this is a load-bearing point that needs to be addressed before the central claim is fully established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.1, Eqs. (2.7) and (2.19)] The no-production theorem rests entirely on identity (2.7), which is quoted from [5] without rederivation, and on its production-amplitude generalization (2.19), which is asserted. The introduction states that the earlier results of [5] covered only models with mass ratios unaffected by one-loop corrections; nothing in the text shows that the retarded/advanced decomposition leading to (2.7) survives when the delta m_a^2 are arbitrary and non-proportional to m_a^2. The collinear-singularity cancellations in (2.14) could in principle depend on the ratios of the mass shifts, and if (2.7) fails, the cancellation in (2.18) collapses. As it stands, the central theorem is load-bearing on an unproven generalization; please provide a proof of (2.7) in the required generality or explicitly state and verify the assumptions under which it remains valid.
  2. [Section 2.2, Eq. (2.23)] The universal elastic formula is imported from [1], where the derivation was performed for theories whose mass ratios do not renormalize. The paper extends it to arbitrary mass shifts by substituting (2.4) into (2.26), but this is only a rewriting; it does not derive the starting identity (2.23) when delta m_a^2 are non-proportional. In particular, the terms involving a_infinity and the principal-value integral in (2.23) came from the one-loop calculation in [1], and the reader cannot see from this manuscript why those terms are unchanged when mass ratios shift. Please either rederive (2.23) or provide a precise statement of the conditions from [1] that are being assumed.
  3. [Section 3.2] The paper claims exact agreement with the bootstrapped S-matrices of [6,7] for all nonsimply-laced affine Toda models, but only the (g_2^(1), d_4^(3)) pair is presented in detail. The remaining dual pairs are covered by the sentence "we did a similar analysis"; no tables, plots, or supplementary files are provided. Because the claim is a systematic check of formula (3.9) on the full class, and the manuscript explicitly markets this as a test, the evidence should be made available so the reader can verify it.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.1, Eq. (2.45)] The evaluation subscript in (2.45) reads mu^2_j = m^2_j, whereas the corresponding expression in (2.44) and the surrounding text use mu^2_k = m^2_k; the index should be corrected.
  2. [Section 2.3, after Eq. (2.58)] The statement that "we expect no solutions" to the constraints (2.54)-(2.58) other than the dilatation (2.35) is unproven; the text should clearly label it as a conjecture, since it is later used as the basis for asserting the necessity of coupling-dependent masses.
  3. [Section 2.2, Eq. (2.34)] The integer n appearing in 1/(4 n pi^2) and in the contour Gamma_n is not defined before use; please define it explicitly.
  4. [Section 3.2, Eq. (3.13)] The sentence explaining that expanding around 2-B and then taking g to 0 is equivalent to the g to infinity expansion is confusing; a clearer statement of the two limits and their relation would help the reader.
  5. [Abstract and Introduction] The phrase "polynomial-like interactions" is informal; the precise class is fixed by (2.1), but a short clarifying remark in the introduction would prevent ambiguity about which Lagrangians are included.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

The no-production theorem rests on identity (2.7)/(2.19), imported from the authors' own [5] without rederivation for the arbitrary mass-shift case; the advertised extension inherits its entire force from the self-cited lemma.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 2.1, eqs. (2.7), (2.18), (2.19); Section 1]
    "Formula (2.7) was originally obtained in [5], thanks to the splitting of each Feynman propagator into a retarded propagator and a Dirac delta function: ... The basic ingredient for proving the absence of inelasticity is indeed the result of [5], which is equally valid for production amplitudes. With our conventions, equation (1.6) of that paper is given by (2.19). ... This question was recently answered only for massive bosonic models with polynomial-like interactions with mass ratios unaffected by one-loop corrections [1, 5]."

    Equation (2.18), the proof that one-loop inelastic amplitudes vanish, is a Taylor expansion whose only nontrivial input is (2.7); for production the same role is played by (2.19), quoted as equation (1.6) of [5] without derivation. The introduction says [5] answered the elasticity question only for mass ratios unaffected by one-loop corrections, so the advertised extension to arbitrary mass shifts is not independently derived: the central theorem inherits exactly the content of the imported identity. The Sec. 3.3 Landau check tests one 2-to-2 process; the Sec. 3.2 bootstrap checks are elastic-only; neither validates (2.19). The theorem stands or falls with the self-cited lemma.

full rationale

The proof is not circular in the strongest sense. The paper does not define one-loop elasticity as its own conclusion; the mass shifts are computed from one-loop bubbles, not fitted to the bootstrapped S-matrices; and the affine-Toda comparisons in Sec. 3.2 are against external, independently bootstrapped S-matrices [6,7]. Equation (2.18) genuinely follows once (2.7) is granted, and (2.7) is a parameter-free prior result with stated assumptions. The problem is load-bearing self-citation: (2.7) and (2.19) are imported from the authors' own [5], and the paper's introduction restricts [5] to the case of mass ratios unaffected by one-loop corrections, while the paper's new claim removes that restriction. No rederivation of (2.7) or (2.19) for arbitrary mass shifts is supplied; the only inelastic check (Sec. 3.3) is one 2-to-2 process, and the production identity (2.19) is untested. This is a genuine dependency on prior work by the same authors, but not an equivalence-by-definition, so the score is moderate.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters. The coupling and mass scale are inputs of the Lagrangian; mass shifts are computed from contour integrals over tree-level amplitudes, not fitted to the bootstrap results. The axioms are the class restriction, tree-level elasticity, and two transfer identities from the authors' prior work. No new particles, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Lagrangians of type (2.1) with polynomial-like interactions, no derivative couplings, and unitary field content.
    The proof and all formulas are restricted to this class; derivative or fermionic interactions are excluded.
  • domain assumption Tree-level elasticity: all inelastic tree-level amplitudes, for two-to-two and production processes, vanish.
    This is the defining premise; it encodes the flipping rule and coupling constraints of [8].
  • domain assumption Identity (2.7): for one-loop inelastic amplitudes, connected diagrams plus two-point counterterms equal the sum over masses of mass-shift derivatives of the tree amplitude.
    Quoted from [5] and extended to n-point amplitudes in (2.19) without rederivation; it is the main technical input.
  • domain assumption Elastic amplitude identity (2.23) from [1] remains valid when one-loop mass ratios are arbitrary.
    Used to derive the universal one-loop S-matrix (2.31); the paper does not prove the identity under the relaxed condition.
  • standard math Planar geometry relations (B.2)-(B.7) and the flipping rule describe the tree-level cancellations.
    Geometric facts from [8] used for double-pole constraints and mass-shift analysis.
  • domain assumption Tree-level S-matrices of nonsimply-laced affine Toda agree with the universal expressions of [8] and with the leading-order expansion of [6,7].
    Input for mass-shift computations and one-loop checks.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of One-loop integrability with shifting masses." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OGB6JSQA

@misc{pith2026241115080,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: One-loop integrability with shifting masses},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OGB6JSQA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15080}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the perturbative integrability of two-dimensional massive quantum field theories with polynomial-like interactions and show that any theory of such class which is purely elastic at the tree level is also purely elastic at one loop. To preserve the elasticity, the physical renormalized masses of the theory must differ from the classical ones by quantum corrections carried by one-loop bubble diagrams. After the masses are corrected in this manner we show that one-loop inelastic processes vanish and integrability is preserved under one-loop effects. Relying on this fact we show that the closed expression for one-loop S-matrices in terms of tree S-matrices obtained in arXiv:2402.12087 extends to models that do not preserve the mass ratios at one loop. We test our results on the full class of nonsimply-laced affine Toda theories and find exact match with the S-matrices bootstrapped in the past.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [5]

    One-loop inelastic amplitudes from tree-level elasticity in 2d

    D. Polvara,One-loop inelastic amplitudes from tree-level elasticity in 2d, JHEP 04 (2023) 020 [2302.04709]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  2. [1]

    One-loop elastic amplitudes from tree-level elasticity in 2d

    M. Fabri and D. Polvara,One-loop elastic amplitudes from tree-level elasticity in 2d, JHEP 06 (2024) 104 [2402.12087]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  3. [2]

    Zamolodchikov and A.B

    A.B. Zamolodchikov and A.B. Zamolodchikov,Factorized S-matrices in two dimensions as the exact solutions of certain relativistic quantum field models, Annals Phys. 120 (1979) 253

    1979

  4. [3]

    Parke,Absence of Particle Production and Factorization of theS Matrix in (1+1)-dimensional Models, Nucl

    S.J. Parke,Absence of Particle Production and Factorization of theS Matrix in (1+1)-dimensional Models, Nucl. Phys. B 174 (1980) 166

    work page 1980

  5. [4]

    Beisert, C

    N. Beisert, C. Ahn, L.F. Alday, Z. Bajnok, J.M. Drummond, L. Freyhult et al.,Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview, Lett. Math. Phys.99 (2012) 3 [1012.3982]

    arXiv 2012

  6. [6]

    Exact S-Matrices for Nonsimply-Laced Affine Toda Theories

    G.W. Delius, M.T. Grisaru and D. Zanon,Exact S matrices for nonsimply laced affine Toda theories, Nucl. Phys. B 382 (1992) 365 [hep-th/9201067]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1992

  7. [7]

    On a generalised bootstrap principle

    E. Corrigan, P.E. Dorey and R. Sasaki,On a generalized bootstrap principle, Nucl. Phys. B 408 (1993) 579 [hep-th/9304065]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1993

  8. [8]

    Tree level integrability in 2d quantum field theories and affine Toda models

    P. Dorey and D. Polvara,Tree level integrability in 2d quantum field theories and affine Toda models, JHEP 02 (2022) 199 [2111.02210]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Braden, E

    H.W. Braden, E. Corrigan, P.E. Dorey and R. Sasaki,Multiple poles and other features of affine Toda field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 356 (1991) 469

    1991

  2. [10]

    Dorey,Exact S matrices, hep-th/9810026

    P. Dorey,Exact S matrices, hep-th/9810026

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    Bercini and D

    C. Bercini and D. Trancanelli,Supersymmetric integrable theories without particle production, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 105013 [1803.03612]

    2018 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Gabai, D

    B. Gabai, D. Mazáč, A. Shieber, P. Vieira and Y. Zhou,No Particle Production in Two Dimensions: Recursion Relations and Multi-Regge Limit, JHEP 02 (2019) 094 [1803.03578]

    2019 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Zamolodchikov,Integrals of Motion and S Matrix of the (Scaled) T=T(c) Ising Model with Magnetic Field, Int

    A.B. Zamolodchikov,Integrals of Motion and S Matrix of the (Scaled) T=T(c) Ising Model with Magnetic Field, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A4 (1989) 4235

    1989

  6. [14]

    Christe and G

    P. Christe and G. Mussardo,Integrable Systems Away from Criticality: The Toda Field Theory and S Matrix of the Tricritical Ising Model, Nucl. Phys. B 330 (1990) 465. – 36 –

    1990

  7. [15]

    Braden, E

    H.W. Braden, E. Corrigan, P.E. Dorey and R. Sasaki,Affine Toda Field Theory and Exact S Matrices, Nucl. Phys. B 338 (1990) 689

    1990

  8. [16]

    Christe and G

    P. Christe and G. Mussardo,Elastic s Matrices in (1+1)-Dimensions and Toda Field Theories, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A5 (1990) 4581

    1990

  9. [17]

    Coleman and H

    S.R. Coleman and H. Thun,On the prosaic origin of the double poles in the Sine-Gordon S matrix, Commun. Math. Phys.61 (1978) 31

    1978

  10. [18]

    Fevola, S

    C. Fevola, S. Mizera and S. Telen,Principal Landau determinants, Comput. Phys. Commun. 303 (2024) 109278 [2311.16219]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Mikhailov, M.A

    A.V. Mikhailov, M.A. Olshanetsky and A.M. Perelomov,Two-Dimensional Generalized Toda Lattice, Commun. Math. Phys.79 (1981) 473

    1981

  12. [20]

    Olive and N

    D.I. Olive and N. Turok,Local Conserved Densities and Zero Curvature Conditions for Toda Lattice Field Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 257 (1985) 277

    1985

  13. [21]

    Arinshtein, V.A

    A.E. Arinshtein, V.A. Fateev and A.B. Zamolodchikov,Quantum s Matrix of the (1+1)-Dimensional Todd Chain, Phys. Lett. B87 (1979) 389

    1979

  14. [22]

    Freund, T.R

    P.G.O. Freund, T.R. Klassen and E. Melzer,S Matrices for Perturbations of Certain Conformal Field Theories, Phys. Lett. B229 (1989) 243

    1989

  15. [23]

    Destri and H.J

    C. Destri and H.J. de Vega,The Exact S Matrix of the AffineE(8) Toda Field Theory, Phys. Lett. B 233 (1989) 336

    1989

  16. [24]

    Klassen and E

    T.R. Klassen and E. Melzer,Purely Elastic Scattering Theories and their Ultraviolet Limits, Nucl. Phys. B 338 (1990) 485

    1990

  17. [25]

    Braden, E

    H.W. Braden, E. Corrigan, P.E. Dorey and R. Sasaki,Extended Toda Field Theory and Exact S Matrices, Phys. Lett. B227 (1989) 411

    1989

  18. [26]

    Dorey,Root systems and purely elastic S matrices, Nucl

    P. Dorey,Root systems and purely elastic S matrices, Nucl. Phys. B 358 (1991) 654

    1991

  19. [27]

    Dorey,Root systems and purely elastic S matrices

    P. Dorey,Root systems and purely elastic S matrices. 2., Nucl. Phys. B 374 (1992) 741 [hep-th/9110058]

    1992 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Fring and D.I

    A. Fring and D.I. Olive,The Fusing rule and the scattering matrix of affine Toda theory, Nucl. Phys. B 379 (1992) 429

    1992

  21. [29]

    Delius, M.T

    G.W. Delius, M.T. Grisaru and D. Zanon,Exact S matrices for the nonsimply laced affine Toda theories a(2)(2n-1), Phys. Lett. B277 (1992) 414 [hep-th/9112007]

    1992 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Dorey,A Remark on the coupling dependence in affine Toda field theories, Phys

    P. Dorey,A Remark on the coupling dependence in affine Toda field theories, Phys. Lett. B 312 (1993) 291 [hep-th/9304149]

    1993 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Oota,q deformed Coxeter element in nonsimply laced affine Toda field theories, Nucl

    T. Oota,q deformed Coxeter element in nonsimply laced affine Toda field theories, Nucl. Phys. B 504 (1997) 738 [hep-th/9706054]

    1997 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Delius, M.T

    G.W. Delius, M.T. Grisaru, S. Penati and D. Zanon,The Exact S matrices of affine Toda theories based on Lie superalgebras, Phys. Lett. B256 (1991) 164

    1991

  25. [33]

    Delius, M.T

    G.W. Delius, M.T. Grisaru, S. Penati and D. Zanon,Exact S matrix and perturbative calculations in affine Toda theories based on Lie superalgebras, Nucl. Phys. B359 (1991) 125

    1991

  26. [34]

    Braden and R

    H.W. Braden and R. Sasaki,Affine Toda perturbation theory, Nucl. Phys. B 379 (1992) 377

    1992

  27. [35]

    Braden and R

    H.W. Braden and R. Sasaki,The S matrix coupling dependence for a, d and e affine toda field theory, Phys. Lett. B255 (1991) 343. – 37 –

    1991

  28. [36]

    Sasaki and F.P

    R. Sasaki and F.P. Zen,The affine Toda S matrices versus perturbation theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 8 (1993) 115

    1993

  29. [37]

    Braden, H.S

    H.W. Braden, H.S. Cho, J.D. Kim, I.G. Koh and R. Sasaki,Singularity analysis in A(n) affine Toda theories, Prog. Theor. Phys.88 (1992) 1205 [hep-th/9207025]

    1992 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Dorey and D

    P. Dorey and D. Polvara,From tree- to loop-simplicity in affine Toda theories I: Landau singularities and their subleading coefficients, JHEP 09 (2022) 220 [2206.09368]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Dorey and D

    P. Dorey and D. Polvara,From tree- to loop-simplicity in affine Toda theories II: higher-order poles and cut decompositions, JHEP 10 (2023) 177 [2307.15498]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Fring, H.C

    A. Fring, H.C. Liao and D.I. Olive,The Mass spectrum and coupling in affine Toda theories, Phys. Lett. B266 (1991) 82

    1991

  33. [41]

    Correia,Nonperturbative anomalous thresholds, Phys

    M. Correia,Nonperturbative anomalous thresholds, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 025012 [2212.06157]

    2024

  34. [42]

    Bianchi and B

    L. Bianchi and B. Hoare,AdS3 ×S3 × M 4 string S-matrices from unitarity cuts, JHEP 1408 (2014) 097 [1405.7947]

    2014 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Bianchi, V

    L. Bianchi, V. Forini and B. Hoare,Two-dimensional S-matrices from unitarity cuts, JHEP 1307 (2013) 088 [1304.1798]

    2013 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Delius, M.T

    G.W. Delius, M.T. Grisaru and D. Zanon,Quantum conserved currents in affine Toda theories, Nucl. Phys. B 385 (1992) 307 [hep-th/9202069]

    1992 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Grisaru, S

    M.T. Grisaru, S. Penati and D. Zanon,Mass corrections in affine Toda theories based on Lie superalgebras, Phys. Lett. B253 (1991) 357

    1991

  38. [46]

    Dorey,The exact s-matrices of affine toda field theories, Durham theses, Durham University (1990)

    P.E. Dorey,The exact s-matrices of affine toda field theories, Durham theses, Durham University (1990) . – 38 –

    1990

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.