Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

An upgraded GMRT and MeerKAT study of radio relics in the low mass merging cluster PSZ2 G200.95-28.16

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Three radio relics in a low-mass cluster merger reveal an off-axis geometry.

desk verdict Solid multi-wavelength study of a rare low-mass merging cluster; the faint R3 relic needs better evidence before the triple-relic claim firms up. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15480 v1 pith:7IIEGXIX submitted 2024-11-23 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.COastro-ph.HE

Arpan Pal , Ruta Kale , Qian H. S. Wang , Daniel R. Wik This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.COastro-ph.HE
keywords GalaxyclustersRadiorelicsClustermergersDiffusiveshockaccelerationpolarizationPSZ2G200.95-28.16OddcirclesLow-mass
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the low-mass merging galaxy cluster PSZ2 G200.95-28.16 contains three genuine radio relics, named the Seahorse, R2, and R3, with largest linear sizes of 1.53 Mpc, 1.12 Mpc, and 340 kpc. Combining upgraded GMRT 400/650 MHz images with MeerKAT 1283 MHz polarization data and Chandra X-ray maps, the authors measure integrated spectral indices of $-1.1\pm0.1$, $-1.4\pm0.2$, and $-1.6\pm0.4$ and show that all three relics are polarized. Under diffusive shock acceleration, the Seahorse and R2 spectra imply shock Mach numbers of $3.1\pm0.8$ and $2.8\pm0.9$, placing them among the weak merger shocks expected in low-mass systems. Because neither X-ray shocks nor a perpendicular relic-to-merger-axis geometry are seen, the paper concludes the cluster is most likely undergoing an off-axis merger, and it reports a 100 kpc radio ring that may be an Odd Radio Circle or a ram-pressure-bent tailed source.

What carries the argument

The argument runs on the diffusive shock acceleration (DSA) relation between the injection spectral index $\alpha_{\rm inj}$ and shock Mach number $M$, $\alpha_{\rm inj}=(M^2+3)/(2(1-M^2))$, applied to integrated spectra under the continuous-injection assumption $\alpha_{\rm int}=\alpha_{\rm inj}-0.5$. Around this sit the resolved spectral index maps, which trace spectral steepening toward the cluster centre and therefore the shock propagation direction, and the MeerKAT polarization B-vector maps, which show smooth, aligned magnetic fields and depolarization across the shock width. The Chandra X-ray surface brightness maps provide the merger axis and subcluster morphology used to test axial, equatorial, and off-axis merger scenarios.

What would settle it

A Chandra temperature or surface-brightness jump measurement across the Seahorse would provide an independent Mach number; if it differs greatly from 3.1, the DSA-based shock interpretation fails. Alternatively, a deep high-resolution image showing R3 to be a compact AGN lobe would remove the triple-relic claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that PSZ2 G200.95-28.16, a low-mass ($M_{500}=(2.7\pm0.2)\times10^{14}\,M_\odot$) merging cluster at $z=0.22$, hosts three radio relics rather than one. The Seahorse relic, first found by Kale et al. 2017, has two filaments separated by a notch and an integrated spectral index of $-1.1\pm0.1$; the eastern relic R2 shows two substructures and $\alpha=-1.4\pm0.2$; the faint northwestern arc R3 has $\alpha=-1.6\pm0.4$ and a largest linear size of only 340 kpc. All three are polarized at 1283 MHz, with fractional polarizations of $23\pm2\%$, $28\pm4\%$, and $58\pm9\%$, and the Seahorse shows spectral steepening toward the cluster centre, indicating outward-propagating shocks. Assuming diffusive shock acceleration with continuous injection, the injection spectral indices imply Mach numbers $3.1\pm0.8$ (Seahorse) and $2.8\pm0.9$ (R2), consistent with the weak shocks expected in low-mass mergers. Chandra images show two subclusters but no surface-brightness discontinuity at the relic positions, and the relics are not perpendicular to the X-ray elongation axis; the paper argues this geometry, together with the smooth aligned magnetic fields seen in the polarization maps, is best explained by an off-axis merger. In the radio power versus cluster mass plane, R2 follows the established relation while the Seahorse and R3 are outliers. A ring-like source detected at 650 MHz, with a mean spectral index of $-0.7\pm0.1$ and edge-enhanced polarization, is proposed as either an Odd Radio Circle candidate or a tailed radio galaxy bent by merger ram pressure.

Load-bearing premise

The claim stands or falls on whether the three diffuse polarized sources, especially the faint R3, are genuine radio relics produced by merger shocks rather than AGN-related or projected background emission.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the DSA interpretation is correct, the Seahorse and R2 shocks have Mach numbers around 3, meaning relatively weak shocks can still produce Mpc-scale radio relics in a low-mass cluster.
  • A triple-relic system in a $2.7\times10^{14}\,M_\odot$ cluster broadens the known population of multiple-relic clusters and challenges the idea that such systems require very massive mergers.
  • The Seahorse and R3 lying off the radio power-mass relation implies that scatter in that relation comes partly from shock strength variations within a single complex merger, not just from cluster mass.
  • The 100 kpc radio ring, if confirmed as an Odd Radio Circle, would be the smallest and lowest-luminosity ORC yet found and would link ORCs to ram-pressure phenomena in merging clusters.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the off-axis merger interpretation holds, the relic geometry implies a substantial impact parameter; matching the relic positions, sizes, and Mach numbers in simulations could constrain the mass ratio and pericenter, a test the paper does not run.
  • R3's identification as a genuine relic rests on a faint 1.64 mJy source seen only in smoothed images; a deep high-resolution observation that resolves its spectrum and polarization would either confirm the triple-relic claim or remove it from the sample.
  • The steep scattered spectral indices seen in low-mass cluster relics suggest that low-mass mergers routinely produce shocks with Mach numbers near 3; targeted surveys of low-mass clusters should find more such relics, which would place the power-mass correlation on firmer footing.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. Pal et al. present uGMRT 400/650 MHz and archival MeerKAT 1283 MHz observations of the low-mass merging cluster PSZ2 G200.95-28.16, together with Chandra X-ray surface brightness maps. They identify three radio relics — the previously known Seahorse (R1) and the newly confirmed R2 and R3 — measure their integrated spectral indices, polarization fractions, and largest linear sizes, and use the diffusive shock acceleration model to convert spectral indices into Mach numbers. They place the relics on the radio power–cluster mass plane, discuss possible merger geometries, and report a ring-like source as an Odd Radio Circle candidate. The central claim is that this low-mass cluster hosts three genuine radio relics whose positions are not perpendicular to the X-ray-determined merger axis, most plausibly indicating an off-axis merger.

Significance. If all three identifications hold, the system is one of the very few clusters with more than two radio relics and the lowest-mass such system known, and the polarization and spectral-index measurements provide concrete constraints for relic acceleration models and merger simulations. The paper's strengths are the use of independent uGMRT and MeerKAT data for the two brighter relics, the standard polarization and RM-synthesis analysis, explicit comparisons with external scaling relations, and a clear data-availability statement. However, the scientific payoff — the triple-relic designation, the outlier status in the scaling relation, and the off-axis merger geometry — depends critically on R3, whose detection is the least secure element in the analysis.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 5.3 / Sec. 5.1 / Table 3] The identification of R3 as a genuine radio relic is not demonstrated at the level required for the paper's central claim. The source is detected only in the 10''×10'' smoothed 650 MHz image and in low-significance MeerKAT contours (2–3σ), and its quoted flux-density error implies a marginal detection. Please show the R3 region in the unsmoothed 650 MHz image, provide a significance or reliability map, compare point-source-subtracted and unsubtracted images, and demonstrate that the emission is resolved beyond the beam. The fractional polarization of 58 ± 9% for R3 is also derived from a very small number of beams and should be reported with the number of independent beams and a debiased estimator if one was not used. If R3 cannot be independently confirmed, the triple-relic interpretation and the geometry discussion in Section 6.3 lose one of their anchors and should be correspondingly downgraded.
  2. [Sec. 3.1 / Table 3 / Fig. 6] The 400 MHz observations are described as severely RFI-affected (about 70% flagged), yet no 400 MHz flux density for the Seahorse is listed in Table 3, and the text does not state whether these data enter the integrated spectral index shown in Fig. 6. If a 400 MHz point is used, its flux density, flagging fraction, and systematic uncertainty must be reported; if it is not used, this should be stated explicitly, because the DSA Mach number in Section 6.2 depends directly on the integrated spectral index.
  3. [Sec. 6.3] The proposed off-axis merger scenario uses the 'faint extension (2σ) of R2 towards the north and then a broken arc up to R3' as morphological evidence connecting R2 and R3. A 2σ feature is not by itself sufficient to support a geometric conclusion; please either demonstrate that the extension is real, for example with a low-resolution MeerKAT image and a reliability mask, or present the scenario without relying on this marginal feature.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract / Table 3] The abstract gives the largest linear size of R2 as '1.12~kpc', which should be '1.12 Mpc'; Table 3 also uses both 'LLS' and 'LSS' for the same quantity.
  2. [Sec. 5.3 / Table 3 / Abstract] The integrated spectral index of R3 is quoted as −1.6 ± 0.3 in Section 5.3 and as −1.6 ± 0.4 in Table 3 and the abstract; these values should be reconciled.
  3. [Sec. 5.3] The phrase 'fractions of R3 with an extension towards the west' is unclear; presumably 'faint parts of R3' is intended.
  4. [Sec. 6.1 / Fig. 11] The reference to 'the green solid line, left panel in Fig. 11' is confusing because the left panel caption describes histograms of spectral indices; please clarify where the Mach-number curve is displayed.
  5. [Sec. 6.4] The statement that the ring 'shares the properties of the Odd Radio Circles' is somewhat strong given the ring's 100 kpc size compared with typical ORC diameters of 300–500 kpc; consider tempering the wording given the alternative tailed-source interpretation.
  6. [References] The van Weeren et al. 2010a and 2010b entries appear to have identical titles and page numbers; please verify the bibliographic details.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Mach numbers follow directly from measured spectral indices via the standard DSA formula, and the scaling-relation comparison uses external samples.

full rationale

This paper is an observational study whose central quantitative claims are derived from directly measured flux densities and spectral indices. The DSA-based Mach numbers (Sec. 6.2) come from applying Eq. 2 to the measured integrated spectral indices, not from any parameter fitted to the same data. The radio-power versus cluster-mass comparison (Sec. 6.1) uses the externally defined scaling relations of de Gasperin et al. 2014 and Jones et al. 2023, with the authors' own measurements plotted against those independent benchmarks. The identification of R3 as a relic is a classification judgment based on faint low-resolution detections, which is a data-quality and astrophysical-interpretation concern, not a circularity: the claim does not assume the conclusion in order to produce it. Self-citations such as Kale et al. 2017 are used to credit the earlier discovery of the Seahorse and to include earlier flux-density measurements in the spectral fit; they are not load-bearing in a way that reduces a prediction to an input. No equation in the paper defines a derived quantity in terms of the quantity it is claimed to predict, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The work is self-contained against external data and standard physical formulas, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters fitted to the data. Its physical interpretations rest on standard but unverified domain assumptions: the DSA model, the continuous injection spectral index relation, the interpretation of X-ray morphology as merger tracers, and the assumption that observed polarization is intrinsic after a simple Galactic RM correction.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The diffusive shock acceleration (DSA) model and Eq. (2) relate the spectral index of radio relics to the shock Mach number.
    Used in Section 6.2 to convert spectral indices -1.1 and -1.4 into Mach numbers 3.1 and 2.8. If DSA does not apply to these weak shocks, the Mach numbers are invalid.
  • domain assumption For continuous injection, the integrated spectral index equals the injection index minus 0.5 (α_int = α_inj - 0.5).
    Invoked in Sections 6.1 and 6.2, though the paper does not explicitly show the conversion from integrated to injection index for the values quoted (-0.7, -0.8). This approximation is standard in relic studies but not directly verified for this object.
  • domain assumption The Chandra X-ray surface brightness peaks trace two subclusters in a merger, and the X-ray elongation defines the merger axis.
    Used in Section 6.3 to argue the relics are not perpendicular to the merger axis and to construct the off-axis merger scenario. The interpretation assumes projection effects are small and the X-ray morphology is dominated by the merger.
  • domain assumption After correcting for the average Galactic RM (4.2 rad m^-2), the measured linear polarization at 1283 MHz is intrinsic to the relics.
    The RM maps show a mean of -1.25 and dispersion of 16.5 rad m^-2; internal Faraday depolarization is not modeled, so the reported polarization fractions could be affected.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An upgraded GMRT and MeerKAT study of radio relics in the low mass merging cluster PSZ2 G200.95-28.16." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7IIEGXIX

@misc{pith2026241115480,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An upgraded GMRT and MeerKAT study of radio relics in the low mass merging cluster PSZ2 G200.95-28.16},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7IIEGXIX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15480}
}
abstract

Diffuse radio sources known as radio relics are direct tracers of shocks in the outskirts of merging galaxy clusters. PSZ2 G200.95-28.16, a low-mass merging cluster($\textrm{M}_{500} = (2.7 \pm 0.2) \times 10^{14}~\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$) features a prominent radio relic, first identified by Kale et al. 2017. We name this relic as the Seahorse. The MeerKAT Galaxy Cluster Legacy Survey has confirmed two additional radio relics, R2 and R3 in this cluster. We present new observations of this cluster with the Upgraded GMRT at 400 and 650 MHz paired with the Chandra X-ray data. The largest linear sizes for the three relics are~1.53 Mpc, 1.12~kpc, and 340~kpc. All three radio relics are polarized at 1283~MHz. Assuming the diffusive shock acceleration model, the spectral indices of the relics imply shock Mach Numbers of $3.1 \pm 0.8$ and $2.8 \pm 0.9$ for the Seahorse and R2, respectively. The Chandra X-ray surface brightness map shows two prominent subclusters, but the relics are not perpendicular to the likely merger axis as typically observed; no shocks are detected at the locations of the relics. We discuss the possible merger scenarios in light of the low mass of the cluster and the radio and X-ray properties of the relics. The relic R2 follows the correlation known in the radio relic power and cluster mass plane, but the Seahorse and R3 relics are outliers. We have also discovered a radio ring in our 650~MHz uGMRT image that could be an Odd radio circle candidate.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.15480 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. X-ray, optical and radio composite image of the PSZ2 G200.95-28.16 field with uGMRT 650 MHz smoothed 10′′×10′′ image in red, DSS-2 R-band image in green, and Chandra 0.8 − 4 keV X-ray image in blue (smoothed with a 10′′ Gaussian kernel). equate to produce the observed radio power for some radio relics, assuming the electrons are directly acceler￾ated from the thermal ICM pool (Kang & Ryu 2011a; Stroe et al. 2013; Bo… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. All the radio relics where they are detected are labelled with R1 (Seahorse), R2, and R3. Top left: uGMRT 400 MHz 7.4 ′′ × 5.7 ′′ image of the PSZ2 G200.95-28.16. The blue ‘x’ marks the location of the X-ray peak. The blue dotted circle signifies the region under R500 centred at the X-ray peak. Top right: uGMRT 650 MHz 5.4 ′′ × 3.8 ′′ image of the cluster PSZ2 G200.95-28.16. All the relevant point sources are marked… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left: uGMRT 10′′ × 10′′ 650 MHz image of the relic Seahorse. Right: 7.9 ′′ × 7.3 ′′ MeerKAT 1283 MHz image of the Seahorse. In all cases, the lowest contour starts at 3σ, and the subsequent levels are plotted in fashion of 3σ×(1, √ 2, 2, 2√ 2,...) with σ650MHz = 31µJy/beam, σ1283MHz = 8µJy/beam. The dashed line represents −3σ in each case. F1 and F2 represent two filaments in the Seahorse morphology. The red and gre… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Variation of surface brightness across the relic width for the two filaments F1 and F2 using the regions pointed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: Spectral index distribution of the Seahorse radio relic using 650 MHz uGMRT and 1283 MHz MeerKAT images, smoothed to a common resolution of 10′′ × 10′′. Right: Error in the spectral index distribution maps. The black contours represent contour levels starting at …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Integrated spectral index for Seahorse radio relic using all the available data points from Kale et al. 2017 and new measurements in this work [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Left: uGMRT 650 MHz 10′′ × 10′′ contours in yellow overlayed on MeerKAT smoothed 1283 MHz 10′′ × 10′′ image of relic R2 in colour scale. The lowest contour starts at 3σ, and the subsequent levels are plotted in fashion of 3σ×(1, √ 2, 2, 2 √ 2,...) with σ650MHz = 45µJy/…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: MeerKAT 1283 MHz polarization vector (B mode) scaled with fractional polarization plotted over the intensity distribution for the relics Seahorse, R2, and R3 in colour scale. The B vectors are corrected for galactic RM contributions. Regions having values more than 3σ …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Top Left: 10′′ × 10′′ RM map of the PSZ2 G200.95-28.16 system in colour scale. The coral squares with 10′′ width and height represent regions over which the RM, fractional polarization, and spectral index maps are averaged for the correlation analysis in the bottom pan…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Left: uGMRT 650 MHz 5.4 ′′ × 3.8 ′′ image of the radio ring(‘S4’). The ‘+’ shows the position of the very faint galaxy associated with the ring. Right: The polarization vector (B mode) scaled with fractional polarization plotted over the intensity distribution. The re…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Left: The red histogram shows the distribution of integrated spectral indices in the high-mass cluster sample while the blue represents the low-mass galaxy cluster sample. The dashed red and green lines represent the fitted Gaussians to the high-mass and low-mass spec…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Left: X-ray surface brightness image of the cluster PSZ2 G200.95-28.16 with blue lines depicting possible shock locations. Right: A schematic cartoon diagram showing the possible off-axis merger geometry in the system. White curves trace out the approx position of the…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multi-frequency Radio Observations of the Dissociative Cluster Merger CIZA J0107.7+5408

    astro-ph.GA 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    New VLA observations resolve the diffuse radio emission in the merging cluster CIZA J0107.7+5408 into two steep-spectrum subcluster components, one showing a 340 MHz edge coincident with a weak X-ray shock but no matc...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    I., Leer, E., & Skadron, G

    Axford, W. I., Leer, E., & Skadron, G. 1977, in International Cosmic Ray Conference, Vol. 11, International Cosmic Ray Conference, 132

    work page 1977

  2. [2]

    Bell, A. R. 1978, MNRAS, 182, 147, doi: 10.1093/mnras/182.2.147

    doi:10.1093/mnras/182.2.147 1978

  3. [3]

    1987, PhR, 154, 1, doi: 10.1016/0370-1573(87)90134-7

    Blandford, R., & Eichler, D. 1987, PhR, 154, 1, doi: 10.1016/0370-1573(87)90134-7

    doi:10.1016/0370-1573(87)90134-7 1987

  4. [4]

    2009, A&A, 494, 429, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810588

    Murgia, M. 2009, A&A, 494, 429, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810588

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810588 2009

  5. [6]

    2020, A&A, 634, A64, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936216

    Botteon, A., Brunetti, G., Ryu, D., & Roh, S. 2020, A&A, 634, A64, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936216

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936216 2020

  6. [7]

    A., & de Bruyn, A

    Brentjens, M. A., & de Bruyn, A. G. 2005, A&A, 441, 1217, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20052990 Br¨ uggen, M., van Weeren, R. J., & R¨ ottgering, H. J. A. 2012, MNRAS, 425, L76, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01304.x

    arXiv 2005

  7. [8]

    2019, ApJ, 883, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3983 CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al

    Brzycki, B., & ZuHone, J. 2019, ApJ, 883, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3983 CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 114501, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3983 2019

  8. [9]

    2017, ApJ, 846, 111, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa85a2

    Chandra, P., & Kanekar, N. 2017, ApJ, 846, 111, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa85a2

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa85a2 2017

Show all 56 references
  1. [10]

    Colafrancesco, S., Marchegiani, P., & Paulo, C. M. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 4747, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1806 de Gasperin, F., van Weeren, R. J., Br¨ uggen, M., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 3130, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1658 Di Gennaro, G., van Weeren, R. J., Hoeft, M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 86...

    2017 doi

  2. [11]

    M., Koribalski, B

    Dolag, K., B¨ oss, L. M., Koribalski, B. S., Steinwandel, U. P., & Valentini, M. 2023, ApJ, 945, 74, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb5f5

    2023 doi

  3. [12]

    S., Parekh, V., Kale, R., & George, L

    Dwarakanath, K. S., Parekh, V., Kale, R., & George, L. T. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 957, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty744

    2018 doi

  4. [13]

    C., & Jones, L

    Ellis, S. C., & Jones, L. R. 2004, MNRAS, 348, 165, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07338.x

    2004

  5. [14]

    A., Biermann, P

    Ensslin, T. A., Biermann, P. L., Klein, U., & Kohle, S. 1998a, A&A, 332, 395, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9712293 —. 1998b, arXiv e-prints, astro, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9805367

    doi arXiv

  6. [15]

    2001, A&A, 373, 106, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010581

    Feretti, L., Fusco-Femiano, R., Giovannini, G., & Govoni, F. 2001, A&A, 373, 106, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010581

    2001 doi

  7. [16]

    C., Allen, G

    Fruscione, A., McDowell, J. C., Allen, G. E., et al. 2006, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 6270, Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems, ed. D. R. Silva & R. E. Doxsey, 62701V, doi: 10.1117/12.671760

    2006 doi

  8. [17]

    T., Dwarakanath, K

    George, L. T., Dwarakanath, K. S., Johnston-Hollitt, M., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 936, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx155

    2017 doi

  9. [18]

    2005, A&A, 440, 867, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053016

    Giacintucci, S., Venturi, T., Brunetti, G., et al. 2005, A&A, 440, 867, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053016

    2005 doi

  10. [19]

    1991, A&A, 252, 528

    Giovannini, G., Feretti, L., & Stanghellini, C. 1991, A&A, 252, 528

    1991

  11. [20]

    A., Feretti, L., & Giovannini, G

    Govoni, F., Enßlin, T. A., Feretti, L., & Giovannini, G. 2001, A&A, 369, 441, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010115

    2001 doi

  12. [21]

    2018, ApJ, 857, 26, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab4a2

    Ha, J.-H., Ryu, D., & Kang, H. 2018, ApJ, 857, 26, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab4a2

    2018 doi

  13. [22]

    C., & Markevitch, M

    Hickox, R. C., & Markevitch, M. 2006, ApJ, 645, 95, doi: 10.1086/504070

    2006 doi

  14. [23]

    N., Shimwell, T

    Hoang, D. N., Shimwell, T. W., Stroe, A., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 1107, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1645

    2017 doi

  15. [24]

    N., Shimwell, T

    Hoang, D. N., Shimwell, T. W., van Weeren, R. J., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A21, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834025

    2019 doi

  16. [25]

    2022, Galaxies, 10, 10, doi: 10.3390/galaxies10010010

    Hoeft, M., Rajpurohit, K., Wittor, D., di Gennaro, G., & Dom ´ ınguez-Fern´ andez, P. 2022, Galaxies, 10, 10, doi: 10.3390/galaxies10010010

    2022 doi

  17. [26]

    S., Betti, S., et al

    Hutschenreuter, S., Anderson, C. S., Betti, S., et al. 2022, A&A, 657, A43, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140486

    2022 doi

  18. [27]

    2023, A&A, 680, A31, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245102

    Jones, A., de Gasperin, F., Cuciti, V., et al. 2023, A&A, 680, A31, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245102

    2023 doi

  19. [28]

    S., Bagchi, J., & Paul, S

    Kale, R., Dwarakanath, K. S., Bagchi, J., & Paul, S. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 1204, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21519.x

    2012

  20. [29]

    R., Giacintucci, S., et al

    Kale, R., Wik, D. R., Giacintucci, S., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 940, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2031

    2017 doi

  21. [30]

    2011a, ApJ, 734, 18, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/734/1/18 —

    Kang, H., & Ryu, D. 2011a, ApJ, 734, 18, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/734/1/18 —. 2011b, ApJ, 734, 18, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/734/1/18

    doi

  22. [31]

    2017, A&A, 600, A18, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629570

    Kierdorf, M., Beck, R., Hoeft, M., et al. 2017, A&A, 600, A18, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629570

    2017 doi

  23. [32]

    D., Rudnick, L., et al

    Knowles, K., Cotton, W. D., Rudnick, L., et al. 2022, A&A, 657, A56, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141488

    2022 doi

  24. [33]

    S., Norris, R

    Koribalski, B. S., Norris, R. P., Andernach, H., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 505, L11, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slab041

    2021 doi

  25. [34]

    Krymskii, G. F. 1977, Akademiia Nauk SSSR Doklady, 234, 1306

    1977

  26. [35]

    J., Kang, H., et al

    Lee, W., Jee, M. J., Kang, H., et al. 2020, ApJ, 894, 60, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab855f

    2020 doi

  27. [36]

    2024, A&A, 686, A55, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348194 17

    Lee, W., Pillepich, A., ZuHone, J., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A55, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348194 17

    2024 doi

  28. [37]

    Shabala, S. S. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 1439, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad074

    2023 doi

  29. [38]

    2005, ApJ, 627, 733, doi: 10.1086/430695

    Markevitch, M., Govoni, F., Brunetti, G., & Jerius, D. 2005, ApJ, 627, 733, doi: 10.1086/430695

    2005 doi

  30. [39]

    J., Nulsen, P

    Markevitch, M., Ponman, T. J., Nulsen, P. E. J., et al. 2000, ApJ, 541, 542, doi: 10.1086/309470

    2000 doi

  31. [40]

    W., Biller, B., et al

    Markevitch, M., Bautz, M. W., Biller, B., et al. 2003, ApJ, 583, 70, doi: 10.1086/345347

    2003 doi

  32. [41]

    P., Hopkins, A

    Norris, R. P., Hopkins, A. M., Afonso, J., et al. 2011, PASA, 28, 215, doi: 10.1071/AS11021

    2011 doi

  33. [42]

    P., Intema, H

    Norris, R. P., Intema, H. T., Kapi´ nska, A. D., et al. 2021, PASA, 38, e003, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2020.52

    2021 doi

  34. [43]

    P., Collier, J

    Norris, R. P., Collier, J. D., Crocker, R. M., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 1300, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac701

    2022 doi

  35. [44]

    2022, MNRAS, 513, 101, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slac038 O’Dea, C

    Omar, A. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 101, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slac038 O’Dea, C. P., & Baum, S. A. 2023, Galaxies, 11, doi: 10.3390/galaxies11030067

    2022 doi

  36. [45]

    Pearce, C. J. J., van Weeren, R. J., Andrade-Santos, F., et al. 2017, ApJ, 845, 81, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7e2f Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., et al. 2011, A&A, 536, A8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116459 Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., et al....

    2017 doi

  37. [46]

    B., Fardal, M

    Poole, G. B., Fardal, M. A., Babul, A., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 881, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10916.x

    2006

  38. [47]

    Gaensler, B. M. 2020, RM-Tools: Rotation measure (RM) synthesis and Stokes QU-fitting, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2005.003

    2020

  39. [48]

    2020a, A&A, 636, A30, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937139

    Rajpurohit, K., Hoeft, M., Vazza, F., et al. 2020a, A&A, 636, A30, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937139

    doi

  40. [49]

    2020b, A&A, 642, L13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039165

    Rajpurohit, K., Vazza, F., Hoeft, M., et al. 2020b, A&A, 642, L13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039165

    doi

  41. [50]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2309.01716, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2309.01716

    Rajpurohit, K., Lovisari, L., Botteon, A., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2309.01716, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2309.01716

    2023 doi arXiv

  42. [51]

    F., Cutri, R

    Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163, doi: 10.1086/498708

    2006 doi

  43. [52]

    J., Intema, H

    Stroe, A., van Weeren, R. J., Intema, H. T., et al. 2013, A&A, 555, A110, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321267 van Weeren, R. J., de Gasperin, F., Akamatsu, H., et al. 2019, SSRv, 215, 16, doi: 10.1007/s11214-019-0584-z van Weeren, R. J., Hoeft, M., R¨ ottgering, H. J. A., et al. ...

    2013 doi

  44. [53]

    2010a, Science, 330, 347, doi: 10.1126/science.1194293 —

    Hoeft, M. 2010a, Science, 330, 347, doi: 10.1126/science.1194293 —. 2010b, Science, 330, 347, doi: 10.1126/science.1194293

    doi

  45. [54]

    J., Rawlings, S., Jarvis, M

    Willott, C. J., Rawlings, S., Jarvis, M. J., & Blundell, K. M. 2003, MNRAS, 339, 173, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06172.x

    2003

  46. [55]

    2023, MNRAS, 523, 701, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1463

    Wittor, D., Br¨ uggen, M., Grete, P., & Rajpurohit, K. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 701, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1463

    2023 doi

  47. [56]

    2021, Galaxies, 9, doi: 10.3390/galaxies9040111

    Wittor, D., Hoeft, M., & Br¨ uggen, M. 2021, Galaxies, 9, doi: 10.3390/galaxies9040111

    2021 doi

  48. [57]

    2014, ApJ, 796, 138, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/796/2/138

    Zhang, C., Yu, Q., & Lu, Y. 2014, ApJ, 796, 138, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/796/2/138

    2014 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.