Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 46 references

Legendre transformations of a class of generalized Frobenius manifolds and the associated integrable hierarchies

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Legendre-type transformations between generalized Frobenius manifolds induce linear reciprocal transformations between their extended integrable hierarchies, and, for semisimple manifolds, between their topological deformations.

desk verdict Genuinely new construction with two excellent explicit examples, but the topological equivalence rests on unproved coefficient identities that a referee should demand before accepting. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15496 v1 pith:YZQKUDMH submitted 2024-11-23 math-ph math.DGmath.MPnlin.SI

Si-Qi Liu , Haonan Qu , Youjin Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.DGmath.MPnlin.SI MSC 37K1053D4517B68
keywords generalizedFrobeniusmanifoldsLegendre-typetransformationsPrincipalHierarchylinearreciprocaltaustructuresVirasorosymmetriesloopequationstopologicaldeformations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes a bridge between two integrable hierarchies whenever their underlying geometric structures are related by a Legendre-type transformation. For a generalized Frobenius manifold—a geometric structure encoding an associative product, a flat metric, and a unit vector field that need not be flat—the paper constructs an extended set of commuting flows, the Legendre-extended Principal Hierarchy, using an invertible quasi-homogeneous Legendre field. It proves that the extended hierarchies of two Legendre-related manifolds are related by a linear reciprocal transformation, and that under semisimplicity the same transformation relates their topological deformations: the two deformed hierarchies share one tau function, and their genus-$g$ free energies coincide up to constants. The result matters because it turns a symmetry of the WDVV associativity equations into an explicit equivalence of integrable systems, covering the known pairs KdV/q-deformed KdV and Toda/Ablowitz-Ladik.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Legendre field $B$: a vector field satisfying $X\cdot\nabla_Y B=Y\cdot\nabla_X B$, which is invertible and quasi-homogeneous. It generates Legendre flows and, together with the recursion (3.28), a family of vector fields $\{\xi_{B,q}\}_{q\in\mathbb Z}$ that extend the Principal Hierarchy to the index set $I_B$; the resulting hierarchy is the family of hydrodynamic-type flows $\partial v/\partial t_{i,p}=\xi_{i,p}\cdot v_x$. Its tau structure is a family of two-point functions $\Omega_{i,p;j,q}$ with $\xi_{i,p}\cdot\xi_{j,q}=\operatorname{grad}_\eta\Omega_{i,p;j,q}$, and its complete data are the matrices $\tilde\mu_B,\tilde R_B$ encoding the monodromy data, the Legendre field's own shift parameter, and extra constants. The Virasoro operators $L_m^{(B)}$ are built from these data, and their linearization condition is shown to be equivalent to the loop equation of $M$. The identity that carries the whole argument is (3.43), which expresses the transformed calibration as $\hat\xi_{\alpha,p}=\hat B\cdot\xi_{\alpha,p}$, $\hat\xi_{0,q}=\hat B\cdot\xi_{B,q}$, $\hat\xi_{\hat B,q}=\hat B\cdot\xi_{0,q}$; every later equivalence, including the equality of free energies, follows from tracking this identification through tau structures and Virasoro conditions.

What would settle it

Compute the coefficients $a^{(B);IJ}_m$, $b^{(B);J}_{m;I}$, $c^{(B)}_{m;IJ}$ directly from definitions (4.4)-(4.7) for an invertible quasi-homogeneous Legendre field on a generalized Frobenius manifold with nontrivial monodromy data $R_s$ and $r_{B;s}$, and check whether $a^{(B);IJ}_m=a^{IJ}_m$ for all indices and whether $b^{(B);B,p}_{m;i,q}$ vanishes unless $i=B$. A single pair $(m,I,J)$ violating (4.13) or (4.15) would break the equivalence in Theorem 4.5 and hence Theorem 4.6.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Legendre-type transformations act coherently at every level of the theory. Let $B$ be an invertible quasi-homogeneous Legendre field on a generalized Frobenius manifold $M$, and let $(\hat M,\hat B)$ be the transformed manifold with $\hat B=B^{-1}$. The paper proves in Theorem 3.13 that the Legendre-extended Principal Hierarchies are related by the linear reciprocal transformation $\hat t_{\alpha,p}=t_{\alpha,p}$, $\hat t_{0,q}=t_{B,q}$, $\hat t_{\hat B,q}=t_{0,q}$, in Theorem 3.18 that their tau structures correspond under the same identification, and in Theorem 4.5 that the linearization of the Legendre-extended Virasoro symmetries is equivalent to the same loop equation as before. Theorem 4.6 then asserts that for semisimple $M$ the topological deformations are related by the same linear reciprocal transformation, share the same tau function, and satisfy $F_g=\hat F_g+\text{const}$ for every genus $g\geq1$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument that the two linearization conditions coincide rests on the asserted Virasoro coefficient identities (4.12)-(4.15), which the paper states as a 'more involved observation' without derivation; if those identities fail, the shared tau function and the equality of free energies would not follow from the presented proof.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every invertible quasi-homogeneous Legendre field yields a hierarchy of commuting hydrodynamic-type flows with a tau structure and Virasoro symmetries, so the construction applies to any generalized Frobenius manifold admitting such a field.
  • The linear reciprocal transformation (3.50) gives an explicit dictionary between the extended hierarchies of Legendre-related manifolds, exchanging the $B$-flows of one with the $0$-flows of the other.
  • When the manifold is semisimple, the topological deformations of the two extended hierarchies have the same tau function, so all genus-$g$ free energies agree up to genus-independent constants.
  • In the one-dimensional example, the topological deformation of the extended KdV hierarchy is mapped to the extended q-deformed KdV hierarchy; in the two-dimensional example, the extended Toda and extended Ablowitz-Ladik hierarchies are mapped to each other.
  • The paper conjectures that the deformed bihamiltonian structure of a semisimple generalized Frobenius manifold with non-flat unity is polynomial, and that this can be proved by applying a Legendre transformation to the flat-unity case.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the asserted Virasoro coefficient identities hold generally, the same scheme should identify the negative flows of one hierarchy with the reciprocal spatial direction of the other in any dimension, not just in the two worked examples.
  • The equivalence suggests a geometric interpretation of discrete symmetries of soliton hierarchies: the shift symmetry of the extended Ablowitz-Ladik hierarchy acts as the reciprocal transformation to the Toda side, so discrete symmetries may be viewed as Legendre duality in disguise.
  • A practical test beyond the paper's examples would be to compute the genus-one free energies $F_1$ and $\hat F_1$ for a Legendre pair in which $B$ is neither flat nor the unit field; equality up to a constant would support Theorem 4.6 without checking all Virasoro coefficients.
  • The conjectured polynomiality of the deformed bihamiltonian structure may be approachable by composing the known flat-unity polynomiality result with the reciprocal transformation constructed here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies a class of generalized Frobenius manifolds related by the generalized Legendre transformations introduced by Strachan and Stedman. The authors construct, for a generalized Frobenius manifold M equipped with a quasi-homogeneous invertible Legendre field B, an extension of the Principal Hierarchy by the Legendre flows generated by B and by the accompanying family of Legendre fields. Their main structural results are: the Legendre-extended Principal Hierarchies of M and of the transformed manifold M-hat are related by the linear reciprocal transformation (3.50); the associated tau structures and complete data transform as stated in Theorem 3.18; the Legendre-extended Virasoro operators and symmetries satisfy the expected commutation relations; the linearization condition of the Legendre-extended Virasoro symmetries is equivalent to the same loop equation as in the non-extended case; and, under semisimplicity, the topological deformations of the two hierarchies share the same tau function and are related by the same linear reciprocal transformation. The paper also presents two detailed examples: the KdV hierarchy and the q-deformed KdV hierarchy, and the Toda and Ablowitz-Ladik hierarchies.

Significance. If the main theorems are correct, the paper gives a substantial extension of the known relationship between Frobenius manifolds under Legendre transformations: it moves from flat-unity Frobenius manifolds to generalized Frobenius manifolds with non-flat unity and upgrades the statement from the dispersionless level to the full topological deformation level. The two examples are valuable and independently checked at low genus, and Theorem 5.1 and Theorem 6.2 give concrete, verifiable equivalences between well-known integrable hierarchies. The paper also benefits from a clear, detailed proof of the linear reciprocal transformation theorem at the dispersionless level. The main limitation is that two load-bearing technical inputs are not proved in the text: the coefficient identities (4.13)-(4.15) and, to a lesser extent, the existence of the extended calibration in Proposition 3.6. These are internal gaps rather than contradictions, since the displayed low-order cases and the examples are consistent, but they need to be filled before the topological claim can be considered fully established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.1, equations (4.13)-(4.15)] The identities (4.13)-(4.15) are load-bearing for the proof of Theorem 4.5, hence for Theorem 4.6. In the proof of Theorem 4.5, the equality a(B;IJ)_m = a(IJ)_m is needed so that the second-derivative and quadratic derivative terms in (4.38) and (4.46) agree, and the support conditions (4.14)-(4.15) are used to conclude that Delta b^J_{m;0,0}=0, which is exactly the step converting the difference of the two flow actions into (4.47). The text only states these identities as 'a more involved observation' with no derivation. If any of them fails, the reduction of (4.44) to the loop equation (4.42) breaks and the shared-tau-function argument in Theorem 4.6 loses its proof. I therefore request a complete proof of (4.13)-(4.15), or an explicit verification from the definitions (4.4)-(4.7), perhaps in an appendix.
  2. [Proposition 3.6] Proposition 3.6 asserts the existence, for an arbitrary quasi-homogeneous Legendre field B, of a family of Legendre fields xi_{B,q} satisfying (3.27)-(3.31) with constants r_{B;s} satisfying (3.32). This existence is foundational: it is used in Definition 3.8 and Definition 3.9 to define the Legendre-extended calibration and the Legendre-extended Principal Hierarchy, and it is later used in the tau-structure construction. The proof is deferred by saying that the argument is similar to the case B=e, details in [31], and is omitted. Since the case B=e is not the same as a generic B, the reader cannot verify the normalization and support conditions (3.32) without reconstructing the proof. Please include the proof, or at least a precise statement of the part of [31] that covers it and an indication of how the constants r_{B;s} are selected.
  3. [Theorem 4.4] Theorem 4.4 states that the Legendre-extended Virasoro flows commute with all flows of the Legendre-extended hierarchy. The proof reduces the claim to verifying (4.33) for m=-1,0,1,2, but for m=1,2 it says only that the method of Appendix B of [31] applies and omits the details. These commutation relations are part of the definition of the Legendre-extended Virasoro symmetries and are used in the linearization setup in Section 4.3. Please provide the missing calculation or a more detailed derivation for m=1,2.
  4. [Theorem 3.18] Theorem 3.18 transfers the tau structure and complete data from (M,B) to (M-hat,B-hat). Its proof says that the remainder can be verified by simple and straightforward calculations and omits the details. The identification of the complete data, especially (3.79), is what later produces the identification of the Virasoro operators (4.16) and hence the equivalence of the linearization conditions. Since this is a load-bearing transfer statement, I ask for at least the main steps of the calculation, in particular the verification that the four steps defining the tau structure in Section 3.4 are preserved under the bijection sigma.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] There are several typographical slips, such as 'Frobeni us' in the abstract and 'the the' in the introduction; these should be corrected in revision.
  2. [Section 4.1, equations (4.18)-(4.21)] The displayed formulas for L^(B)_m for m=-1,0,1,2 are stated to have the same expressions as in [14] and [31], but the notation in the m=1 and m=2 formulas uses t_{i,p} with the extended index set while the sums over s and the R_B entries are not all explicitly explained; a brief indication of the range of summation over the extended indices would improve readability.
  3. [Section 4.2] In the proof of Theorem 4.4, the notation partial/partial s^{[B]}_m appears once and should be partial/partial s^{(B)}_m for consistency with Definition 4.3.
  4. [Section 5.2] In Section 5.2, the sentence 'From the flows ... we obtain the following relationships between the coordinates' is followed by formulas that include the fourth derivatives of v and hat v, but the derivation of the relation for the fourth derivative is not shown; adding one line explaining how the higher derivative is obtained from the reciprocal transformation would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the Legendre correspondence is a genuine equivalence; the unproved coefficient identities are correctness gaps, not circular shortcuts.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain does not reduce any claimed prediction to an input by construction. Theorem 3.13 is obtained by direct coordinate computations using the Legendre-field identities (2.10)-(2.11), and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Theorem 4.5 reduces the Legendre-extended linearization condition to the known loop equation via the difference identity (4.47); the proof relies on the coefficient identities (4.13)-(4.15), which are introduced as 'a more involved observation' without derivation. This is an omitted proof or potential gap, but it is not circularity: those identities are not the theorem being proved, and they are not obtained by assuming the conclusion. Proposition 3.6 is likewise deferred to [31], but [31] is an independent, parameter-free mathematical result about generalized Frobenius manifolds, not a restatement of the present paper's target theorem. The uniqueness used in Theorem 4.6 is imported from [30], which again is an external theorem about arbitrary semisimple generalized Frobenius manifolds and does not assume the Legendre correspondence. The paper also supplies independent checks: in Sections 5 and 6 it verifies the free-energy relations explicitly for KdV/q-deformed KdV and Toda/Ablowitz-Ladik, and gives spectral-problem derivations for the Miura-type maps. These benchmarks show that the claimed equivalences have content beyond the definitions. Accordingly, while the paper leans on same-group citations and contains unproved assertions, those are not instances where a result is equivalent to its inputs by definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard machinery of Frobenius manifolds (axioms 1-2), the choice of an invertible quasi-homogeneous Legendre field (3), semisimplicity (4), and the loop equation theory imported from prior work by the same group (5). Two in-paper results with omitted proofs act as additional assumptions: the existence of the extended calibration (6) and the Virasoro coefficient identities (7). None of these are fitted parameters; they are mathematical assumptions, but two are not fully demonstrated in the text.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The generalized Frobenius manifold axioms (η, c, e): flat metric η, associative Frobenius multiplication c with unity e, and symmetric 4-tensor ∇c.
    Stated in Section 2.1; this is the object of study, not derived.
  • domain assumption There exists a diagonalizable Euler vector field E satisfying (2.13) and taking the local form (2.14).
    Quasi-homogeneity is assumed throughout; Section 2.2.
  • domain assumption B is an invertible quasi-homogeneous Legendre field satisfying equations (2.3) and (2.15).
    The entire construction of the Legendre-extended hierarchy and of the transform to M-hat requires such a B; Definition 2.1, Definition 2.4.
  • domain assumption The generalized Frobenius manifold is semisimple for the topological deformation statements (Theorems 4.5, 4.6 and the examples).
    Assumed explicitly in Sections 4.3-4.4 and 5-6; needed for uniqueness of loop equation solutions.
  • domain assumption The loop equation (4.42) for a semisimple generalized Frobenius manifold has a unique solution that yields the topological deformation (theorem from [30], used as a black box).
    Used in Section 4.4 to conclude F_g equals F-hat_g up to constants; not reproved in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper Proposition 3.6: for any quasi-homogeneous Legendre field B there exists a family of Legendre fields ξ_{B,q} satisfying (3.27)-(3.31) with constants r_{B;s} satisfying (3.32).
    Proof is deferred to the analogous case in [31] and omitted here; the Legendre-extended hierarchy depends on this existence.
  • ad hoc to paper The Virasoro coefficient identities (4.12)-(4.15) hold; they are asserted as 'a more involved observation' in Section 4.1 and used to prove Theorem 4.5.
    These identities are load-bearing for the equivalence of the two linearization conditions but are not fully derived in the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Legendre transformations of a class of generalized Frobenius manifolds and the associated integrable hierarchies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YZQKUDMH

@misc{pith2026241115496,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Legendre transformations of a class of generalized Frobenius manifolds and the associated integrable hierarchies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YZQKUDMH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15496}
}
read the original abstract

For two generalized Frobenius manifolds related by a Legendre-type transformation, we show that the associated integrable hierarchies of hydrodynamic type, which are called the Legendre-extended Principal Hierarchies, are related by a certain linear reciprocal transformation; we also show, under the semisimplicity condition, that the topological deformations of these Legendre-extended Principal Hierarchies are related by the same linear reciprocal transformation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [31]

    S.-Q. Liu, H. Qu, Y. Zhang, Generalized Frobenius manif olds with non-flat unity and integrable hierarchies, eprint arXiv: 2209.00483. 51

    work page Pith review arXiv

  2. [32]

    S.-Q. Liu, Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, The extended Ablowitz-Lad ik hierarchy and a generalized Frobenius manifold. eprint arXiv: 2404.08895

    arXiv

  3. [1]

    Arsie, A

    A. Arsie, A. Buryak, P. Lorenzoni, P. Rossi, Flat F-manif olds, F-CohFTs, and integrable hierarchies, Comm. Math. Phys. 388 (2021), 291–328

    work page 2021

  4. [2]

    Arsie, A

    A. Arsie, A. Buryak, P. Lorenzoni, P. Rossi, Semisimple fl at F-manifolds in higher genus, Comm. Math. Phys. 397 (2023), 141–197

    work page 2023

  5. [3]

    X. Blot, D. Lewanski, S. Shadrin, On the strong DR/DZ conj ecture, eprint arXiv: 2405.12334

    arXiv

  6. [4]

    Brini, G

    A. Brini, G. Carlet, P. Rossi, Integrable hierarchies an d the mirror model of local CP1, Phys. D 241 (2012) 2156–2167

    work page 2012

  7. [5]

    Buryak, Double ramification cycles and integrable hie rarchies, Comm

    A. Buryak, Double ramification cycles and integrable hie rarchies, Comm. Math. Phys. 336 (2015), 1085–1107

    work page 2015

  8. [6]

    Buryak, H

    A. Buryak, H. Posthuma, S. Shadrin, On deformations of qu asi-Miura transformations and the Dubrovin-Zhang bracket, J. Geom. Phys. 62 (2012), 1639–1651

    work page 2012

Show all 46 references
  1. [7]

    Buryak, H

    A. Buryak, H. Posthuma, S. Shadrin, A polynomial bracket for the Dubrovin-Zhang hierarchies, J. Differential Geom. 92 (2012), 153–185

    2012

  2. [8]

    Carlet, B

    G. Carlet, B. Dubrovin, Y. Zhang, The extended Toda hiera rchy, Mosc. Math. J. 4 (2004), 313–332

    2004

  3. [9]

    N. K. Chidambaram, E. Garcia-Failde, A. Giacchetto, Rel ations on Mg,n and the neg- ativer-spin Witten conjecture, eprint arXiv: 2205.15621

    arXiv

  4. [10]

    Dubrovin, Geometry of 2D topological field theories, In: Integrable systems and quantum groups (Montecatini Terms, 1993), Lecture Notes in Math., 1620, Springer, Berlin, 1996, pp

    B. Dubrovin, Geometry of 2D topological field theories, In: Integrable systems and quantum groups (Montecatini Terms, 1993), Lecture Notes in Math., 1620, Springer, Berlin, 1996, pp. 120–348

    1993

  5. [11]

    Dubrovin, Integrable systems and classification of 2 -dimensional topological field theories, In: Integrable Systems, Progress in Mathematics , vol

    B. Dubrovin, Integrable systems and classification of 2 -dimensional topological field theories, In: Integrable Systems, Progress in Mathematics , vol. 115, Birkh¨ auser, Boston, 1993, pp. 313–359

    1993

  6. [12]

    Dubrovin, Painlev´ e transcendents in two-dimensio nal topological field theory, In: The Painlev´ e property, CRM Ser

    B. Dubrovin, Painlev´ e transcendents in two-dimensio nal topological field theory, In: The Painlev´ e property, CRM Ser. Math. Phys., Springer, New York, 1999, pp. 287–412

    1999

  7. [13]

    Dubrovin, S.-Q

    B. Dubrovin, S.-Q. Liu, Y. Zhang, Bihamiltonian cohomo logies and integrable hierar- chies II: the tau structures, Comm. Math. Phys. 361 (2018), 467–524

    2018

  8. [14]

    Dubrovin, Y

    B. Dubrovin, Y. Zhang, Frobenius manifolds and Virasor o constraints, Selecta Math. 5 (1999), 423–466. 50

    1999

  9. [15]

    Dubrovin, Y

    B. Dubrovin, Y. Zhang, Normal forms of hierarchies of in tegrable PDEs, Frobenius manifolds and Gromov-Witten invariants, eprint arXiv: mat h/0108160

  10. [16]

    Dubrovin, Y

    B. Dubrovin, Y. Zhang, Virasoro symmetries of the exten ded Toda hierarchy, Comm. Math. Phys. 250 (2004), 161–193

    2004

  11. [17]

    H. Fan, T. Jarvis, Y. Ruan, The Witten equation, mirror s ymmetry, and quantum singularity theory, Ann. of Math. (2) 178 (2013), 1-106

    2013

  12. [18]

    Feigin, L

    M. Feigin, L. Kaminski, I. A. Strachan, Legendre transf orms for type An and Bn ∨- systems, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 57 (2024), 475205

    2024

  13. [19]

    Getzler, The jet-space of a Frobenius manifold and hi gher-genus Gromov-Witten invariants, In: Frobenius manifolds, Aspects Math., E36, F riedr

    E. Getzler, The jet-space of a Frobenius manifold and hi gher-genus Gromov-Witten invariants, In: Frobenius manifolds, Aspects Math., E36, F riedr. Vieweg & Sohn, Wies- baden, 2004, pp. 45–89

    2004

  14. [20]

    Getzler, The Toda conjecture, In: Symplectic geomet ry and mirror symmetry (Seoul, 2000), World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, 2001, pp

    E. Getzler, The Toda conjecture, In: Symplectic geomet ry and mirror symmetry (Seoul, 2000), World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, 2001, pp. 51–79

    2000

  15. [21]

    Givental, Gromov-Witten invariants and quantizati on of quadratic Hamiltonians, Mosc

    A. Givental, Gromov-Witten invariants and quantizati on of quadratic Hamiltonians, Mosc. Math. J. 1 (2001), 551–568

    2001

  16. [22]

    Givental, Semisimple Frobenius structures at highe r genus, Internat

    A. Givental, Semisimple Frobenius structures at highe r genus, Internat. Math. Res. Notices, 2001 (2001), 1265–1286

    2001

  17. [23]

    Givental, T

    A. Givental, T. Milanov, Simple singularities and inte grable hierarchies, Progr. Math. 232, Birkh¨ auser Boston, Boston, MA, 2005, pp. 173–201

    2005

  18. [24]

    Hern´ andez Iglesias, S

    F. Hern´ andez Iglesias, S. Shadrin, Bi-Hamiltonian re cursion, Liu-Pandharipande rela- tions, and vanishing terms of the second Dubrovin-Zhang bra cket, Comm. Math. Phys. 392 (2022), 55–87

    2022

  19. [25]

    Hertling, Frobenius manifolds and moduli spaces for singularities

    C. Hertling, Frobenius manifolds and moduli spaces for singularities. Cambridge Tracts in Math., Vol. 151. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002

    2002

  20. [26]

    Hertling, Yu

    C. Hertling, Yu. Manin, Weak Frobenius manifolds, Inte rnat. Math. Res. Notices 1999 (1999), 277–286

    1999

  21. [27]

    Kontsevich, Intersection theory on the moduli space of curves and the matrix Airy function, Comm

    M. Kontsevich, Intersection theory on the moduli space of curves and the matrix Airy function, Comm. Math. Phys. 147 (1992), 1–23

    1992

  22. [28]

    Kontsevich, Y

    M. Kontsevich, Y. Manin, Gromov-Witten classes, quant um cohomology, and enumer- ative geometry, Comm. Math. Phys. 164 (1994), 525–562

    1994

  23. [29]

    Li, S.-Q

    S. Li, S.-Q. Liu, H. Qu, Y. Zhang, Tri-hamiltonian struc ture of the Ablowitz-Ladik hierarchy, Physica D 433 (2022), 133180

    2022

  24. [30]

    S.-Q. Liu, H. Qu, Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, Solutions of the loop equations of a class of generalized Frobenius manifolds, Comm. Math. Phys. 405 (2024), Paper No. 225

    2024

  25. [33]

    S.-Q. Liu, Z. Wang, Y. Zhang, Linearization of Virasoro symmetries associated with semisimple Frobenius manifolds, Adv. Math., to appear, epr int arXiv: 2109.01846

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    S.-Q. Liu, D. Xu, Y. Zhang, The inversion symmetry of the WDVV equations and tau functions, Physica D 241 (2012), 2168–2177

    2012

  27. [35]

    S.-Q. Liu, D. Yang, Y. Zhang, C. Zhou, On equivariant Gro mov–Witten invariants of resolved conifold with diagonal and anti-diagonal actions , Lett. Math. Phys. 112 (2022), Paper No. 129

    2022

  28. [36]

    S.-Q. Liu, D. Yang, Y. Zhang, C. Zhou, The Hodge-FVH corr espondence, J. Reine Angew. Math. 775 (2021), 259–300

    2021

  29. [37]

    S.-Q. Liu, Y. Zhang, C. Zhou, Fractional Volterra hiera rchy, Lett. Math. Phys. 108 (2018), 261–283

    2018

  30. [38]

    Manin, F-manifolds with flat structure and Dubrovin ’s duality, Adv

    Yu. Manin, F-manifolds with flat structure and Dubrovin ’s duality, Adv. Math. 198 (2005), 5–26

    2005

  31. [39]

    A. E. Mironov, I. A. Taimanov, On some algebraic example s of Frobenius manifolds, eprint arXiv: math-ph/0609033

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Romano, Frobenius structures on double Hurwitz spac es, Int

    S. Romano, Frobenius structures on double Hurwitz spac es, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2015 (2015), 538–577

    2015

  33. [41]

    Y. Ruan, G. Tian, A mathematical theory of quantum cohom ology, J. Differential Geom. 42 (1995), 259–367

    1995

  34. [42]

    I. A. Strachan, R. Stedman, Generalized Legendre trans formations and symmetries of the WDVV equations, J. Phys. A. 50(9) (2017), 095202

    2017

  35. [43]

    Witten, On the structure of the topological phase of t wo-dimensional gravity, Nucl

    E. Witten, On the structure of the topological phase of t wo-dimensional gravity, Nucl. Phys. B. 340 (1990), 281–332

    1990

  36. [44]

    Witten, Two-dimensional gravity and intersection t heory on moduli space, Surv

    E. Witten, Two-dimensional gravity and intersection t heory on moduli space, Surv. Differ. Geom. 1 (1990), 243–310

    1990

  37. [45]

    Yang, Analytic theory of Legendre-type transformat ions for a Frobenius manifold, Comm

    D. Yang, Analytic theory of Legendre-type transformat ions for a Frobenius manifold, Comm. Math. Phys. 405 (2024), paper No. 234

    2024

  38. [46]

    Zhang, On the CP1 topological sigma model and the Toda lattice hierarchy, J

    Y. Zhang, On the CP1 topological sigma model and the Toda lattice hierarchy, J. G eom. Phys. 40 (2002), 215–232. 52

    2002

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.