Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 63 references

Acoustic forces near elastic substrate

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Excitation of a leaky Rayleigh wave strongly modifies the acoustic force on a nearby monopole scatterer and shifts its stable levitation position above an elastic substrate.

desk verdict Plausible new mechanism for acoustic force modification via leaky Rayleigh waves, but the ka=1 monopole truncation is doing more work than the main text supports. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15507 v1 pith:QXNYDJJO submitted 2024-11-23 physics.class-ph

classification physics.class-ph
keywords acousticradiationforceleakyRayleighwaveelasticsubstrateGreen'sfunctionmonopolescattererbindingsurfacewavestweezers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper predicts that the acoustic radiation force on a small particle sitting near an elastic substrate is not set by the mirror-like reflection of sound alone: launching a leaky Rayleigh wave at the interface introduces a sharp resonance that can suppress or enhance the lateral force and displace the height at which the particle stably levitates. The argument is built with a Green's-function description of a monopole scatterer whose effective polarizability is renormalized to include multiple reflections between particle and substrate. Using parameters for a polystyrene sphere in water above quartz, the authors show that near the Rayleigh angle the x-component of the force nearly vanishes at one height and is enhanced at another. They also show that the substrate opens a surface-wave-mediated channel in the acoustic binding of two particles, although in their examples the bulk-wave channel dominates. The result matters because it suggests an extra control knob—incidence angle relative to the surface-wave resonance—for acoustic trapping and sorting in lab-on-chip devices.

What carries the argument

The central objects are the reflected part of the acoustic Green's function, $G_s(\mathbf{r},\mathbf{r}_0) = \frac{i}{4\pi}\int_0^\infty R(k_x)e^{ik_z(z+z_0)}J_0(k_x d_x)\frac{k_x}{k_z}dk_x$, and the renormalized monopole polarizability $\alpha_s = (1 - k^2 G_s(\mathbf{r}_0,\mathbf{r}_0)\alpha_0)^{-1}\alpha_0$. The reflection coefficient $R(k_x)$ of the liquid-elastic-substrate interface has a complex pole at $k_x = k_R$ corresponding to the leaky Rayleigh wave, and this pole is what makes the force resonant. The force follows from $F = -\frac{1}{2\omega}\operatorname{Im}(M^*\nabla p)$ with $M = -i\omega\beta\alpha_s p(\mathbf{r}_0)$. For two particles, the same Green's function enters the coupled effective polarizabilities $\tilde\alpha_i^s$, and the surface-wave part of the binding force is isolated as a residue at $k_x = k_R$.

What would settle it

Measure the lateral acoustic force on a 100 µm polystyrene sphere in water at 2.4 MHz above a quartz half-space while sweeping the incidence angle through the Rayleigh angle ($\theta_R \approx 28^\circ$) at heights $d_z/\lambda = 0.6$ and $0.8$; the predicted near-zero suppression at the first height and enhancement at the second would directly confirm or refute the resonance effect.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the pole of the plane-wave reflection coefficient at the leaky Rayleigh wavenumber $k_R$ produces a measurable change in the force acting on a monopole scatterer above an elastic half-space. Because the reflected field acquires an additional $2\pi$ phase shift near the resonance, the interference with the incident wave changes sign depending on distance: at $d_z/\lambda = 0.6$ the lateral force drops to almost zero, while at $0.8$ it is enhanced, and the stable position along $z$ shifts accordingly. For two particles in a normally incident field, the substrate-mediated rescattering modifies the acoustic binding force and the pattern of stable equilibrium positions, which are no longer equidistant. The surface-wave contribution to the binding force is found to be small compared with the bulk-wave contribution in the cases studied.

Load-bearing premise

The predictions assume that a single point monopole with a renormalized polarizability captures the acoustic force on the real particle, even though the numerical example uses a sphere of radius comparable to the wavelength ($ka=1$), where dipole and higher multipoles are not negligible.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Varying the incidence angle through the Rayleigh angle offers a resonant control of the acoustic force on a particle, with suppression or enhancement depending on the particle's height.
  • The stable levitation height of a particle above an elastic substrate can be shifted by tuning the incidence angle to the leaky Rayleigh wave resonance.
  • Elastic substrates introduce a surface-wave-mediated coupling channel in acoustic binding; although weak in the examples shown, it modifies the pattern of stable two-particle configurations.
  • The theoretical framework, based on renormalized monopole polarizabilities, can be applied to other localized waves, such as evanescent waves at acoustic metamaterial interfaces, where the authors expect stronger effects at small distances.
  • The predicted force features near the Rayleigh angle are accessible to experimental verification with existing pendulum-type radiation-force measurements near a boundary for inclined incidence.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the monopole predictions survive a full multipole treatment, the resonance could act as a switch: particles at one levitation height would feel almost no lateral force while those at another are strongly pushed, enabling selective transport in microfluidic channels.
  • The claimed insensitivity to viscosity and higher multipoles is not proven by the paper; a direct comparison with full-wave simulations for the ka≈1 sphere would settle whether the near-zero suppression is quantitatively real.
  • The substrate resonance might also appear in the force on a particle as a function of frequency at fixed angle, since $k_R$ depends on frequency; sweeping frequency could provide a cleaner experimental test than angle control.
  • For ensembles, the non-equidistant stable positions imply that surface-wave-induced binding could be used to create non-uniform particle lattices, but this goes beyond the two-particle examples presented.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops an analytic model, based on a Green's function formalism and a monopole point-scatterer approximation, for the acoustic radiation force on microspheres near a liquid-elastic-solid interface. The elastic half-space enters through the plane-wave reflection coefficient, whose pole at the leaky Rayleigh wavenumber produces a rapid phase variation near the Rayleigh angle. The authors predict that exciting this leaky Rayleigh wave strongly modifies the angle-dependent acoustic force on a particle and shifts its stable levitation height, and they extend the model to two-particle acoustic binding near the substrate, quantifying the small contribution of the surface-wave channel. The numerical illustration uses a 100 μm polystyrene sphere in water at 2.4 MHz (ka = 1) above a quartz substrate.

Significance. If the predictions are quantitatively correct, the paper proposes a new and potentially useful mechanism for acoustic manipulation: using the elastic substrate resonance to control the radiation force and stable positions of nearby particles. The model has the notable strength of being parameter-free; all predictions follow from the standard elastic reflection coefficient and the stated force formulas, with no fitted parameters. The central physical picture, that the rapid phase anomaly of the reflected wave near the Rayleigh angle modifies the interference pattern and hence the force, is plausible and well grounded in the elastic reflection coefficient. The claims are, however, demonstrated only within a monopole point-scatterer model, and the numerical example is deliberately placed at ka = 1, where higher multipoles are expected to contribute. Because the headline effect is a resonant feature localized in incidence angle, the quantitative validity of the predictions for the demonstrated parameter regime is the main open question.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2, Eqs. (2)–(5), Fig. 2] The numerical demonstration is performed at ka = 1 (100 μm polystyrene sphere in water at 2.4 MHz), but the force model truncates the scattering problem to the monopole partial wave. The renormalized polarizability in Eq. (5) dresses only the monopole channel; dipole and higher multipole channels, which contribute to the radiation force at ka = 1, are not included. The closing paragraph asserts that neglecting higher multipoles, viscosity, gravity and buoyancy 'will not affect the predicted effects' and refers to Supplementary Sec. V, which was not available for review; this is an assertion, not a demonstrated result. Because the headline effect is a resonant suppression/enhancement localized in incidence angle, a few-tens-of-percent contribution from dipole forces could change the depth of the dip or the location of the stable plane. Please either provide a quantitative estimate of the multipole contribution in the ka = 1 regime, perform a benchmark against a full partial-wave or numerical solution for a sphere near a liquid-elastic interface, or restrict the quantitative claims to ka << 1.
  2. [§3, Eq. (9), Fig. 3(b)] The formula for the leaky-Rayleigh-wave contribution to the binding force is displayed without derivation, and its notation is undefined: 'M*1 I(kR)resR|kR M2' does not specify the indices, the residue operation, or the path of the kx-integration that generates the residue. This formula underlies the claim in Fig. 3(b) that the surface-wave channel is weak, so the derivation must be present in the article (or in accessible supplementary material) for the claim to be checkable. Please define all symbols and show the residue calculation at kx = kR explicitly.
  3. [§3, Eq. (8)] The statement after Eq. (8) that the solution is 'exact' should be qualified: it is exact only for the truncated monopole point-scatterer model, not for the finite-size spheres used in the numerical example. In addition, Eq. (8) is a resummation of a multiple-scattering series; for particles close to each other and to the substrate, the convergence of this series and the accuracy of the point-monopole approximation should be demonstrated. At ka = 1, the interparticle distances in Fig. 3 can be comparable to the particle size, so near-field couplings neglected by the point-scatterer treatment may affect the predicted binding stiffness.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption has a duplicated panel label: the second paragraph also starts with '(a)', but it should be '(b)' or a distinct label for the cross-section panels.
  2. [Eq. (9)] The expression 'M*1 I(kR)resR|kR M2' appears to be a typographical corruption; please write the residue formula with explicit indices, a defined residue operator, and a clear specification of the integration contour.
  3. [Final paragraph] The phrase 'higher order multiples' should read 'higher-order multipoles'.
  4. [Throughout] The main text repeatedly refers to Supplementary materials for the derivations of Eqs. (3), (5), (8), and (9). If the supplementary is not available with the preprint, these derivations should at least be sketched in the main text or in an appendix so the results can be independently checked.
  5. [§2, discussion of Fig. 2] The sentence about 'accumulation of additional 2π phase' should clarify that the observable effect comes from the rapid variation of the reflection phase with incidence angle; a total 2π change alone leaves the standing-wave pattern invariant, so the wording should be made more precise.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the predicted force modifications follow from the known elastic reflection coefficient and standard monopole force formulas, with no fitted parameters.

full rationale

The paper contains no circular derivation. The central prediction—resonant modification of the acoustic force near the Rayleigh angle—is obtained by substituting the plane-wave reflection coefficient R(kx) of Eq. (6), which follows from standard elastic boundary conditions, into the Green's function Gs of Eq. (3), and then evaluating the radiation force Eq. (2) with the renormalized monopole polarizability Eq. (5). No parameter is fitted to any target output; all material constants (water, polystyrene, quartz) and the incident frequency are stated external inputs. The residue formula Eq. (9) for the surface-wave force is a mathematical consequence of the pole in R(kx) within the same Green's function, not an independent assumption. The self-citations [33] and [35] supply standard force and point-scatterer renormalization results; these are parameter-free and do not presuppose the predicted force modification, so they are not load-bearing in a circular sense. The closing claim that neglected multipoles, viscosity, gravity, and buoyancy 'will not affect the predicted effects' is asserted rather than demonstrated, but that is a validity limitation, not circularity; it does not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters were fitted to data; all material constants are taken from the literature. The model's scientific weight rests on the monopole approximation and the claim that neglected physics is unimportant, both of which are assumptions rather than derived results.

assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper The monopole point-scatterer model with renormalized polarizability (Eq. 5) remains accurate for a particle with ka≈1.
    The numerical example uses a 100 µm particle at 2.4 MHz (ka≈1), where higher multipoles are non-negligible; the paper provides no quantitative justification that they can be neglected.
  • domain assumption The multiple-scattering series between the particle and the substrate converges, making the renormalized polarizability in Eq. 5 finite.
    Point-scatterer models require regularization of the self-interaction term; the paper states the renormalization was performed but does not show the details in the main text.
  • ad hoc to paper Neglected effects (gravity, buoyancy, viscosity, higher-order multipoles) do not change the predicted qualitative outcomes.
    This is asserted in the limitations paragraph at the end of the main text without supporting estimates.
  • standard math The acoustic force expression F = -(1/(2ω)) Im(M* ∇p) (Eq. 2) is valid for the considered scatterer.
    This is a known result from Toftul et al. (2019) for small particles in the long-wavelength regime.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Acoustic forces near elastic substrate." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QXNYDJJO

@misc{pith2026241115507,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Acoustic forces near elastic substrate},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QXNYDJJO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15507}
}
read the original abstract

In this work, we study the acoustic forces acting on particles due to sound scattering at the interface with an elastic substrate. Utilizing the Green's function formalism, we predict that excitation of leaking Rayleigh wave results in strong modification of the acoustic pressure force acting on a monopole scatterer and changes the equilibrium position of particles above the substrate surface. We also showed that the presence of a substrate changes the configuration of the acoustical binding of two particles due to multiple rescattering of acoustic wave from the interface. The reported results propose the method of acoustic manipulation via surface waves excitation and demonstrate the effect from elastic media in acoustical trapping of microobjects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.15507 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Scattering of a plane wave incident at a Rayleigh [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (b). The peculiarities near the bulk waves excita￾tion are also present however they are much weaker. One should also note that LRW excitation drastically changes the stable position along z-direction (green dashed line in 2 (a)) where accumulation of additional 2π phase at the resonant is clearly seen. Thus, excitation of LRW can resonantly enhance or suppress the acoustic pressure force. Next, we analyze how elast… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) acoustic binding of two interacting monopole particles near the substrate in the field of normally incident plane [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) stable positions of particles pair determined [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ozcelik , author J

    author author A. Ozcelik , author J. Rufo , author F. Guo , author Y. Gu , author P. Li , author J. Lata , \ and\ author T. J. \ Huang ,\ title title Acoustic tweezers for the life sciences , \ 10.1038/s41592-018-0222-9 journal journal Nature Methods \ volume 15 ,\ pages 1021–1028 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

  2. [2]

    Meng , author F

    author author L. Meng , author F. Cai , author F. Li , author W. Zhou , author L. Niu , \ and\ author H. Zheng ,\ title title Acoustic tweezers , \ 10.1088/1361-6463/ab16b5 journal journal Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics \ volume 52 ,\ pages 273001 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

  3. [3]

    Dholakia , author B

    author author K. Dholakia , author B. W. \ Drinkwater , \ and\ author M. Ritsch-Marte ,\ title title Comparing acoustic and optical forces for biomedical research , \ 10.1038/s42254-020-0215-3 journal journal Nature Reviews Physics \ volume 2 ,\ pages 480–491 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

  4. [4]

    author author B. W. \ Drinkwater ,\ title title A perspective on acoustical tweezers—devices, forces, and biomedical applications , \ @noop journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 117 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

  5. [5]

    Yin , author X

    author author C. Yin , author X. Jiang , author S. Mann , author L. Tian , \ and\ author B. W. \ Drinkwater ,\ title title Acoustic trapping: An emerging tool for microfabrication technology , \ @noop journal journal Small \ volume 19 ,\ pages 2207917 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

  6. [6]

    Baresch , author J.-L

    author author D. Baresch , author J.-L. \ Thomas , \ and\ author R. Marchiano ,\ title title Observation of a single-beam gradient force acoustical trap for elastic particles: acoustical tweezers , \ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 116 ,\ pages 024301 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  7. [7]

    Li , author C

    author author J. Li , author C. Shen , author T. J. \ Huang , \ and\ author S. A. \ Cummer ,\ title title Acoustic tweezer with complex boundary-free trapping and transport channel controlled by shadow waveguides , \ @noop journal journal Science advances \ volume 7 ,\ pages eabi5502 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

  8. [8]

    Fan , author X

    author author Y. Fan , author X. Wang , author J. Ren , author F. Lin , \ and\ author J. Wu ,\ title title Recent advances in acoustofluidic separation technology in biology , \ @noop journal journal Microsystems & Nanoengineering \ volume 8 ,\ pages 94 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    Ahmed , author G

    author author H. Ahmed , author G. Destgeer , author J. Park , author J. H. \ Jung , \ and\ author H. J. \ Sung ,\ title title Vertical hydrodynamic focusing and continuous acoustofluidic separation of particles via upward migration , \ @noop journal journal Advanced science \...

  2. [10]

    author author M. A. \ Andrade , author A. Marzo , \ and\ author J. C. \ Adamowski ,\ title title Acoustic levitation in mid-air: Recent advances, challenges, and future perspectives , \ @noop journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 116 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

  3. [11]

    author author J. F. \ Pazos Ospina , author V. Contreras , author J. Estrada-Morales , author D. Baresch , author J. L. \ Ealo , \ and\ author K. Volke-Sep \'u lveda ,\ title title Particle-size effect in airborne standing-wave acoustic levitation: Trapping particles at pressu...

  4. [12]

    author author V. V. \ Bjerknes ,\ http://archive.org/details/fieldsofforce00bjeruoft title Fields of force \ ( publisher New York, Col. Univ. Press ,\ year 1906 ) NoStop

  5. [13]

    author author A. A. \ Doinikov \ and\ author S. T. \ Zavtrak ,\ title title On the mutual interaction of two gas bubbles in a sound field , \ 10.1063/1.868506 journal journal Physics of Fluids \ volume 7 ,\ pages 1923–1930 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

  6. [14]

    author author G. T. \ Silva \ and\ author H. Bruus ,\ title title Acoustic interaction forces between small particles in an ideal fluid , \ 10.1103/physreve.90.063007 journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 90 ( year 2014 ),\ 10.1103/physreve.90.063007 NoStop

  7. [15]

    author author A. R. \ Mohapatra , author S. Sepehrirahnama , \ and\ author K.-M. \ Lim ,\ title title Experimental measurement of interparticle acoustic radiation force in the rayleigh limit , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 97 ,\ pages 053105 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

  8. [16]

    Sepehrirahnama , author K.-M

    author author S. Sepehrirahnama , author K.-M. \ Lim , \ and\ author F. S. \ Chau ,\ title title Numerical study of interparticle radiation force acting on rigid spheres in a standing wave , \ 10.1121/1.4916968 journal journal The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America \...

  9. [17]

    author author J. H. \ Lopes , author M. Azarpeyvand , \ and\ author G. T. \ Silva ,\ title title Acoustic interaction forces and torques acting on suspended spheres in an ideal fluid , \ 10.1109/tuffc.2015.2494693 journal journal IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectric...

  10. [18]

    Hoque \ and\ author A

    author author S. Hoque \ and\ author A. Sen ,\ title title Interparticle acoustic radiation force between a pair of spherical particles in a liquid exposed to a standing bulk acoustic wave , \ @noop journal journal Physics of Fluids \ volume 32 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

  11. [19]

    Habibi , author C

    author author R. Habibi , author C. Devendran , \ and\ author A. Neild ,\ title title Trapping and patterning of large particles and cells in a 1d ultrasonic standing wave , \ 10.1039/c7lc00640c journal journal Lab on a Chip \ volume 17 ,\ pages 3279–3290 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  12. [20]

    Tang \ and\ author L

    author author T. Tang \ and\ author L. Huang ,\ title title Mie particle assembly by a converging ultrasound field and acoustic interaction forces , \ 10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108123 journal journal Applied Acoustics \ volume 180 ,\ pages 108123 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

  13. [21]

    Zhang , author C

    author author S. Zhang , author C. Qiu , author M. Wang , author M. Ke , \ and\ author Z. Liu ,\ title title Acoustically mediated long-range interaction among multiple spherical particles exposed to a plane standing wave , \ 10.1088/1367-2630/18/11/113034 journal journal New ...

  14. [22]

    Pavlic , author L

    author author A. Pavlic , author L. Ermanni , \ and\ author J. Dual ,\ title title Interparticle attraction along the direction of the pressure gradient in an acoustic standing wave , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 105 ,\ pages L053101 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

  15. [23]

    Eslami , author H

    author author F. Eslami , author H. Hamzehpour , author S. Derikvandi , \ and\ author S. Amir Bahrani ,\ title title Acoustic interaction force between two particles immersed in a viscoelastic fluid , \ 10.1063/5.0143005 journal journal Physics of Fluids \ volume 35 ( year 202...

  16. [24]

    Baasch , author I

    author author T. Baasch , author I. Leibacher , \ and\ author J. Dual ,\ title title Multibody dynamics in acoustophoresis , \ 10.1121/1.4977030 journal journal The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America \ volume 141 ,\ pages 1664–1674 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  17. [25]

    author author N. St. Clair , author D. Davenport , author A. D. \ Kim , \ and\ author D. Kleckner ,\ title title Dynamics of acoustically bound particles , \ 10.1103/physrevresearch.5.013051 journal journal Physical Review Research \ volume 5 ( year 2023 ),\ 10.1103/physrevres...

  18. [26]

    Wang , author C

    author author M. Wang , author C. Qiu , author S. Zhang , author R. Han , author M. Ke , \ and\ author Z. Liu ,\ title title Sound-mediated stable configurations for polystyrene particles , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 96 ,\ pages 052604 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  19. [27]

    author author G. T. \ Silva , author J. H. \ Lopes , author J. P. \ Leão-Neto , author M. K. \ Nichols , \ and\ author B. W. \ Drinkwater ,\ title title Particle patterning by ultrasonic standing waves in a rectangular cavity , \ 10.1103/physrevapplied.11.054044 journal journa...

  20. [28]

    Sepehrirahnama , author F

    author author S. Sepehrirahnama , author F. S. \ Chau , \ and\ author K.-M. \ Lim ,\ title title Effects of viscosity and acoustic streaming on the interparticle radiation force between rigid spheres in a standing wave , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 93 ,\...

  21. [29]

    author author D. J. \ Collins , author B. Morahan , author J. Garcia-Bustos , author C. Doerig , author M. Plebanski , \ and\ author A. Neild ,\ title title Two-dimensional single-cell patterning with one cell per well driven by surface acoustic waves , \ @noop journal journal...

  22. [30]

    author author T. D. \ Nguyen , author V. T. \ Tran , author Y. Q. \ Fu , \ and\ author H. Du ,\ title title Patterning and manipulating microparticles into a three-dimensional matrix using standing surface acoustic waves , \ @noop journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volu...

  23. [31]

    Mandal \ and\ author S

    author author D. Mandal \ and\ author S. Banerjee ,\ title title Surface acoustic wave (saw) sensors: Physics, materials, and applications , \ @noop journal journal Sensors \ volume 22 ,\ pages 820 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

  24. [32]

    Destgeer , author K

    author author G. Destgeer , author K. H. \ Lee , author J. H. \ Jung , author A. Alazzam , \ and\ author H. J. \ Sung ,\ title title Continuous separation of particles in a pdms microfluidic channel via travelling surface acoustic waves (tsaw) , \ @noop journal journal Lab on ...

  25. [33]

    Toftul , author K

    author author I. Toftul , author K. Bliokh , author M. Petrov , \ and\ author F. Nori ,\ title title Acoustic radiation force and torque on small particles as measures of the canonical momentum and spin densities , \ 10.1103/physrevlett.123.183901 journal journal Physical Revi...

  26. [34]

    author author E. G. \ Williams ,\ @noop title Fourier acoustics: sound radiation and nearfield acoustical holography \ ( publisher Academic press ,\ year 1999 ) NoStop

  27. [35]

    Kostina , author M

    author author N. Kostina , author M. Petrov , author A. Ivinskaya , author S. Sukhov , author A. Bogdanov , author I. Toftul , author M. Nieto-Vesperinas , author P. Ginzburg , \ and\ author A. Shalin ,\ title title Optical binding via surface plasmon polariton interference , ...

  28. [36]

    author author Q. X. \ Wang \ and\ author K. Manmi ,\ title title Three dimensional microbubble dynamics near a wall subject to high intensity ultrasound , \ 10.1063/1.4866772 journal journal Physics of Fluids \ volume 26 ( year 2014 ),\ 10.1063/1.4866772 NoStop

  29. [37]

    Baasch \ and\ author J

    author author T. Baasch \ and\ author J. Dual ,\ title title Acoustic radiation force on a spherical fluid or solid elastic particle placed close to a fluid or solid elastic half-space , \ 10.1103/physrevapplied.14.024052 journal journal Physical Review Applied \ volume 14 ( y...

  30. [38]

    K\" a hler , author D

    author author H. K\" a hler , author D. Platz , \ and\ author S. Schmid ,\ title title Surface acoustic wave coupling between micromechanical resonators , \ 10.1038/s42005-022-00895-2 journal journal Communications Physics \ volume 5 ( year 2022 ),\ 10.1038/s42005-022-00895-2 NoStop

  31. [39]

    author author A. Bostr\" o m ,\ title title Transmission and reflection of acoustic waves by an obstacle in a waveguide , \ 10.1016/0165-2125(80)90026-8 journal journal Wave Motion \ volume 2 ,\ pages 167–184 ( year 1980 ) NoStop

  32. [40]

    author author G. C. \ Gaunaurd \ and\ author H. Huang ,\ title title Acoustic scattering by a spherical body near a plane boundary , \ 10.1121/1.410126 journal journal The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America \ volume 96 ,\ pages 2526–2536 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

  33. [41]

    author author E. L. \ Shenderov ,\ title title Diffraction of sound by an elastic or impedance sphere located near an impedance or elastic boundary of a halfspace , \ 10.1134/1.1507206 journal journal Acoustical Physics \ volume 48 ,\ pages 607–617 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

  34. [42]

    author author A. K. \ Miri \ and\ author F. G. \ Mitri ,\ title title Acoustic radiation force on a spherical contrast agent shell near a vessel porous wall – theory , \ 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.11.006 journal journal Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology \ volume 37 ,\ pages ...

  35. [43]

    Wang \ and\ author J

    author author J. Wang \ and\ author J. Dual ,\ title title Theoretical and numerical calculation of the acoustic radiation force acting on a circular rigid cylinder near a flat wall in a standing wave excitation in an ideal fluid , \ 10.1016/j.ultras.2011.09.002 journal journa...

  36. [44]

    Qiao , author X

    author author Y. Qiao , author X. Zhang , \ and\ author G. Zhang ,\ title title Acoustic radiation force on a fluid cylindrical particle immersed in water near an impedance boundary , \ 10.1121/1.4986624 journal journal The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America \ volume...

  37. [45]

    author author F. G. \ Mitri ,\ title title Acoustic radiation force on a cylindrical particle near a planar rigid boundary , \ 10.1088/2399-6528/aab109 journal journal Journal of Physics Communications \ volume 2 ,\ pages 045019 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

  38. [46]

    Zang , author Y

    author author Y. Zang , author Y. Qiao , author J. Liu , \ and\ author X. Liu ,\ title title Axial acoustic radiation force on a fluid sphere between two impedance boundaries for gaussian beam , \ 10.1088/1674-1056/28/3/034301 journal journal Chinese Physics B \ volume 28 ,\ p...

  39. [47]

    author author A. Maksimov ,\ title title Splitting of the surface modes for bubble oscillations near a boundary , \ 10.1063/5.0025196 journal journal Physics of Fluids \ volume 32 ( year 2020 ),\ 10.1063/5.0025196 NoStop

  40. [48]

    author author B. E. \ Simon \ and\ author M. F. \ Hamilton ,\ title title Analytical solution for acoustic radiation force on a sphere near a planar boundary , \ 10.1121/10.0016885 journal journal The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America \ volume 153 ,\ pages 627–642 (...

  41. [49]

    author author A. A. \ Doinikov \ and\ author A. Bouakaz ,\ title title Interaction of an ultrasound-activated contrast microbubble with a wall at arbitrary separation distances , \ 10.1088/0031-9155/60/20/7909 journal journal Physics in Medicine and Biology \ volume 60 ,\ page...

  42. [50]

    author author P. J. \ Westervelt ,\ title title Acoustic radiation pressure , \ 10.1121/1.1908669 journal journal The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America \ volume 29 ,\ pages 26–29 ( year 1957 ) NoStop

  43. [51]

    author author O. A. \ Sapozhnikov \ and\ author M. R. \ Bailey ,\ title title Radiation force of an arbitrary acoustic beam on an elastic sphere in a fluid , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America \ volume 133 ,\ pages 661--676 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

  44. [52]

    de Vries , author D

    author author P. de Vries , author D. van Coevorden , \ and\ author A. Lagendijk ,\ title title Point scatterers for classical waves , \ 10.1103/RevModPhys.70.447 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 70 ,\ pages 447--466 ( year 1998 ) ,\ note iSBN: 0034-6861 NoStop

  45. [53]

    Maurice Ewing ,\ http://archive.org/details/elasticwavesinla032682mbp title Elastic Waves In Layered Media \ ( publisher McGraw Hill Book Company Inc

    author author W. Maurice Ewing ,\ http://archive.org/details/elasticwavesinla032682mbp title Elastic Waves In Layered Media \ ( publisher McGraw Hill Book Company Inc. ,\ year 1957 ) NoStop

  46. [54]

    Royer \ and\ author E

    author author D. Royer \ and\ author E. Dieulesaint ,\ @noop title Elastic waves in solids I: Free and guided propagation \ ( publisher Springer Science & Business Media ,\ year 1999 ) NoStop

  47. [55]

    Bertoni \ and\ author T

    author author H. Bertoni \ and\ author T. Tamir ,\ title title Unified theory of rayleigh-angle phenomena for acoustic beams at liquid-solid interfaces , \ @noop journal journal Applied physics \ volume 2 ,\ pages 157--172 ( year 1973 ) NoStop

  48. [56]

    Gedge \ and\ author M

    author author M. Gedge \ and\ author M. Hill ,\ title title Acoustofluidics 17: Theory and applications of surface acoustic wave devices for particle manipulation , \ @noop journal journal Lab on a Chip \ volume 12 ,\ pages 2998--3007 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

  49. [57]

    Garcia-Sabat \'e , author A

    author author A. Garcia-Sabat \'e , author A. Castro , author M. Hoyos , \ and\ author R. Gonz \'a lez-Cinca ,\ title title Experimental study on inter-particle acoustic forces , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America \ volume 135 ,\ pages 105...

  50. [58]

    Saeidi , author M

    author author D. Saeidi , author M. Saghafian , author S. Haghjooy Javanmard , author B. Hammarstr \"o m , \ and\ author M. Wiklund ,\ title title Acoustic dipole and monopole effects in solid particle interaction dynamics during acoustophoresis , \ @noop journal journal The J...

  51. [59]

    author author B. E. \ Simon \ and\ author M. F. \ Hamilton ,\ title title Measurement of acoustic radiation force on a sphere near a boundary , \ in\ @noop booktitle Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics ,\ Vol. volume 51 \ ( organization AIP Publishing ,\ year 2023 ) NoStop

  52. [60]

    Nikolaeva , author S

    author author A. Nikolaeva , author S. Tsysar , \ and\ author O. Sapozhnikov ,\ title title Measuring the radiation force of megahertz ultrasound acting on a solid spherical scatterer , \ @noop journal journal Acoustical Physics \ volume 62 ,\ pages 38--45 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  53. [61]

    author author K. Y. \ Bliokh \ and\ author F. Nori ,\ title title Transverse spin and surface waves in acoustic metamaterials , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 99 ,\ pages 020301 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

  54. [62]

    author author C. M. \ Park , author J. J. \ Park , author S. H. \ Lee , author Y. M. \ Seo , author C. K. \ Kim , \ and\ author S. H. \ Lee ,\ title title Amplification of acoustic evanescent waves using metamaterial slabs , \ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ vo...

  55. [63]

    Ambati , author N

    author author M. Ambati , author N. Fang , author C. Sun , \ and\ author X. Zhang ,\ title title Surface resonant states and superlensing in acoustic metamaterials , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics \ volume 75 ,\ pages 195447 ( ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.