Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 33 references

Kuramoto model with stochastic resetting and coupling through an external medium

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Global phase resetting in an indirectly coupled Kuramoto model reduces to a four-dimensional system in which only the oscillator variables reset, and this subsystem resetting can flip a bistable population between synchronized states even…

desk verdict A solid OA-based extension of resetting to indirectly coupled Kuramoto oscillators, but the OA invariance under resetting is assumed rather than tested, and Eq. (4.7) needs fixing. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15534 v1 pith:QZTH6QRY submitted 2024-11-23 cond-mat.stat-mech nlin.AO

Paul C Bressloff This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechnlin.AO MSC 34C1560G5592B25 PACS 05.45.Xt05.40.-a
keywords KuramotomodelstochasticresettingexternalmediumquorumsensingOtt-Antonsenansatzsubsystemslow-fastdynamicsnoise-inducedtransition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks what happens when a population of phase oscillators that interact indirectly through a common external medium is subjected to global stochastic phase resetting, with the medium itself left untouched. It derives the continuity equation for the population density under such resetting and shows that the density equation is itself stochastically reset, so the mean-field average does not close. Projecting onto the Ott-Antonsen manifold yields a four-dimensional piecewise-deterministic system in which only the oscillator order parameter $r$ and average phase $\phi$ reset, while the medium amplitude $R$ and phase $\Phi$ continue smoothly. The paper then uses this reduced system to show that at high cell densities one recovers the classical Kuramoto model with global resetting, while at low densities subsystem resetting strongly affects synchronization, enabling noise-induced transitions in bistable regimes and slow/fast dynamics. A sympathetic reader would care because the model is aimed at bacterial quorum-sensing networks and other indirectly coupled systems, where resetting only the cells' phases could act as a control that switches collective behavior.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Ott-Antonsen ansatz for the oscillator phase density, which assumes all Fourier coefficients in the angle expansion are powers $\eta^n$ of a single complex function $\eta(\omega, t)$; combined with a Lorentzian natural-frequency distribution, the contour integral collapses the infinite hierarchy to closed equations for $z(t)$ and $Z(t)$, and then to the four real variables $r, R, \phi, \Phi$. The resetting enters as a jump condition on $\eta$ (equivalently on $z = r e^{i\phi}$) at Poisson times, which is why only half the coordinates reset. For the frequency-locked case $\omega_0 = \Omega$ the equations reduce further to the planar system (4.17), whose piecewise-deterministic stationary density $q^*(r; R_0)$ is obtained explicitly and then used in a slow/fast averaging argument to determine the slow medium amplitude $R(t)$.

What would settle it

Simulate the full phase-oscillator model with many oscillators and global phase resetting, then check whether the second and higher circular moments of the phase distribution stay locked to the powers of a single complex number predicted by the reduced system; if they drift away after resets, the four-dimensional equations do not represent the population and the predicted transitions are artifacts.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that global phase resetting with a non-resetting external medium does not destroy the low-dimensional Ott-Antonsen description; it simply turns it into a four-dimensional piecewise-deterministic system $(r, R, \phi, \Phi)$ with subsystem resetting $r \to r_0$, $\phi \to 0$ at Poisson times. Because the medium is not reset, the post-reset state is a new initial condition lying in a potentially different basin of attraction, so the stochastic resetting acts as a source of noise even though no thermal or extrinsic noise is present. In the low-density regime this manifests as noise-induced transitions between coexisting coherent states or from incoherence to coherence, and in the frequency-locked case $\omega_0 = \Omega$ the reduced planar system exhibits slow/fast dynamics whose stationary distribution for the fast order parameter can be computed exactly and matched to the slow evolution of the medium amplitude. The paper presents numerical simulations of the reduced OA system supporting these transitions, plus a slow/fast averaging calculation whose self-consistency condition $R^* = E[r|R^*]$ agrees with the simulated asymptotes.

Load-bearing premise

The whole reduction rests on an unproven assumption that the special low-dimensional family of phase distributions used in the analysis stays closed under stochastic resetting whenever the reset phases also come from that family, so if repeated resets push the population outside this family the predicted transitions need not occur in the full system.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At high cell densities ($\sigma_0 \to \infty$), the medium amplitude locks to the order parameter, $R(t) \to r(t)$, and the dynamics reduces to the one-dimensional classical Kuramoto model with global resetting, reproducing the known nonequilibrium stationary state.
  • At low densities, the external amplitude becomes a slow variable; averaging the fast resetting order parameter against its nonequilibrium stationary state yields a self-consistency equation for the asymptotic medium amplitude, and the paper's numerics confirm this approximation.
  • Subsystem resetting can induce transitions between coexisting states in a bistable deterministic regime without any additional noise source; in the examples shown the transitions are irreversible.
  • The resetting density equation cannot be closed by a mean-field expectation, because the medium amplitude is a linear functional of the stochastic density; the stochastic resetting must be retained in the continuum limit.
  • The qualitative conclusions generalize to any piecewise-deterministic ODE with subsystem resetting: if only a subset of variables resets, the post-reset point can land in a different basin of attraction, enabling noise-induced transitions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism suggests a practical control protocol for quorum-sensing or coupled-laser systems: deliberately resetting the oscillator phases at a tunable rate could move the population between a low-activity and a high-activity synchronized state without changing coupling or adding noise, if the OA reduction survives finite-size effects.
  • One could test the transition-rate statistics against the reduced system: the mean time to switch should scale with the resetting rate and with the distance of the reset point from the separatrix; such a scaling law is not derived in the paper.
  • The same slow/fast averaging strategy should apply to other mean-field oscillator models with resetting in only a subset of variables, provided the fast subsystem has a unique ergodic nonequilibrium stationary state; this is an unproven extension.
  • A quantitative falsifier of the OA-invariance assumption would be to measure the second and third circular moments of the finite-$N$ density immediately after resets: if they deviate from $\eta^n$ scaling, the four-dimensional system overstates the switching capability.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper extends the Kuramoto model with indirect coupling through an external medium to include global stochastic phase resetting, where the oscillators' phases reset simultaneously to their initial values at Poisson-distributed times while the external medium state Z(t) does not reset. The authors derive a stochastic continuity equation for the population density (Section 3), show that naive averaging fails to close, and then apply an Ott-Antonsen (OA) ansatz to reduce the infinite-dimensional description to a four-dimensional piecewise-deterministic system with subsystem resetting (Section 4). They use this reduced system to study the role of the cell density parameter σ0: in the high-density limit they recover the known OA dynamics of the classical Kuramoto model with global resetting, while in the low-density limit they report noise-induced transitions between coexisting states (Figures 5 and 6) and develop a slow/fast analysis with a nonequilibrium stationary state for the fast order parameter and a self-consistency condition for the slow amplitude (Section 5, Figure 8). The central claim is that subsystem resetting alone provides a mechanism for switching between basins of attraction without an external noise source.

Significance. If the OA reduction is valid under resetting, the paper offers a tractable low-dimensional description of a biologically motivated oscillator model with a non-trivial interplay between stochastic resetting and indirect coupling. The slow/fast analysis in Section 5 is carefully constructed, and the self-consistency check in Figure 8 provides nontrivial support for the averaging approximation. The paper explicitly recovers prior known results in the high-density limit, which serves as a useful consistency check. The main limitation is that the entire phenomenological picture — including the reported noise-induced transitions and slow/fast dynamics — rests on the OA ansatz being preserved by the resetting protocol, and this is asserted rather than demonstrated. No full-N simulations are reported to validate the reduction against the original finite-oscillator model, which is a significant gap given that the reset distribution in the original protocol is not generally of OA form.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4, Eq. (4.7)] The Fourier projection of the continuity equation is not correct as stated. The advective term in the Fourier-transformed equation carries a factor n, so the correct equation is n η^(n-1)(∂η/∂t + iωη + K/2(Zη²−Z*)) = h(t)(η0^n − η^n). This factor is essential: when it is included, the resetting source cannot be collapsed into a single closed ODE for η; instead, the reset must be described as an instantaneous jump of the density to ρ0. The paper does use the jump condition in (4.9), but the derivation as presented via (4.7) is therefore misleading and should be rewritten to state explicitly that between resets η satisfies (4.8) and at a reset η^n is set to η0^n so that η(T)=r0.
  2. [Section 4, Eqs. (4.4)–(4.9)] The reduction to the four-dimensional system (4.15) is valid only when the reset density ρ0 is exactly on the OA manifold, i.e., ρ0(θ,ω)=g(ω)p0(θ) with p0 the Poisson kernel (4.6) and r0 real and independent of ω. The reset protocol defined in Eq. (2.8a), resetting each phase to its own initial value, does not guarantee such a distribution; in the continuum limit ρ0 is the joint empirical distribution of initial phases and frequencies, which in general is not of OA form. Since the central results — the noise-induced transitions in Figures 5 and 6 and the slow/fast behavior in Figures 7 and 8 — are obtained exclusively from the reduced system, the paper needs to either restrict its claims to the OA-form reset distribution and state this limitation prominently, or provide full-N simulations of the original model to confirm that the reduced dynamics faithfully reproduce the full system. No such simulations are reported.
  3. [Section 5.1, Eqs. (5.20)–(5.22)] The slow/fast reduction replaces Eq. (4.17b) by the averaged equation (5.20) and determines the asymptotic amplitude R* via the self-consistency condition (5.22). The numerical validation in Figure 8 covers only two values of λ for a single parameter set. Given that the slow/fast analysis is one of the paper's main contributions, the paper should provide a more systematic validation, for example by varying σ0, λ, r0, and the initial value of R, and should discuss the conditions under which the averaging approximation is expected to hold. As written, the claim rests on a small number of simulation runs, even though the qualitative findings appear plausible.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (2.3b)] There is a typo: the right-hand side reads "− +i[ω0 − Ω]Z(t)"; the plus sign should be removed.
  2. [Section 4, opening sentence] The phrase "our analysis ts to project" should read "our analysis is to project".
  3. [Section 4, after Eq. (4.17)] The word "coexsist" should be "coexist".
  4. [Figure 6 caption] The caption contains "Eqs. Eqs. (4.14) and (4.15a-d)"; the duplicated "Eqs." should be removed.
  5. [General terminology] The term "noise-induced transition" is used for transitions caused by the Poisson resetting process. Since resetting is a jump process rather than a continuous noise source, the nomenclature should be clarified in the text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reduced OA system is derived from the stated model and reset protocol; self-citations are contextual and the averaging check is a validation, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that global phase resetting with the external medium unreset reduces the infinite-dimensional Kuramoto-with-external-medium model to the four-dimensional subsystem-resetting OA system (4.15). This is a genuine reduction rather than a repackaging of inputs: the inputs are the oscillator-medium equations (2.8), the Poisson reset protocol, and the explicit OA ansatz (4.4)-(4.5); the output (4.15) is obtained by Fourier expansion, contour integration for a Lorentzian frequency distribution, and treating resets as instantaneous jumps (4.9). The high-density limit recovers the independently known classical Kuramoto global-resetting results of Refs. [23,24], which serves as an external consistency check. The self-citation to Ref. [24] is used only to motivate the continuity-equation construction and is not load-bearing for any of the new results. The Section 5.1 check, where the numerical value of R* is inserted into E[r|R*] to verify the self-consistency condition R*=E[r|R*], is a validation of the averaging approximation on the same reduced system, not a parameter fitted to a predicted quantity; it is not circular. The OA-invariance argument is asserted rather than fully proved, and Eq. (4.7) contains a mode-index omission, but this is a mathematical correctness concern, not a circularity: the reset jump sets the Fourier coefficients to r0^n, so the reduction is not equivalent to its assumptions by construction. No fitted input is later renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing argument reduces to a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model uses only parameters from the prior literature (coupling K, frequency spread Δ, resetting rate λ, density σ0, reset amplitude r0, detuning ω0-Ω); none are fitted to data. The central derivation relies on standard assumptions listed above and introduces no new entities.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Ott-Antonsen ansatz: the Fourier coefficients of the phase density satisfy ρ_n = η^n for all n.
    Invoked in Section 4, Eq. (4.4), to close the infinite hierarchy. Its validity with resetting is assumed; only the no-resetting case was established in [10].
  • domain assumption Reset density lies on the OA manifold with a single real coefficient r0.
    Section 4, Eq. (4.5): the initial/reset phase distribution is a wrapped Cauchy distribution, restricting the reset protocol. Arbitrary reset distributions are not covered.
  • domain assumption Continuum limit: the empirical measure converges to a smooth density satisfying Eq. (3.12).
    Section 3: a rigorous mean-field limit for the resetting system is not given; the paper follows the construction of [24].
  • domain assumption Lorentzian frequency distribution.
    Section 4, Eq. (4.11): used to evaluate η at -iΔ and obtain a finite system; the phase diagram and NESS depend on this choice.
  • domain assumption Radial amplitudes are slaved: r_j ≈ √λ0, reducing (2.1) to phase-only Kuramoto.
    Section 2, Eqs. (2.2)-(2.3): standard large-λ0 reduction; restricts validity to that regime.
  • domain assumption Ergodicity of the fast variable for the averaging theorem.
    Section 5.1, Eqs. (5.20)-(5.22): the averaged equation assumes a unique NESS for r at fixed R and that the slow variable R can be averaged; the paper provides numerical rather than rigorous support.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Kuramoto model with stochastic resetting and coupling through an external medium." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QZTH6QRY

@misc{pith2026241115534,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Kuramoto model with stochastic resetting and coupling through an external medium},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QZTH6QRY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15534}
}
read the original abstract

Most studies of collective phenomena in oscillator networks focus on directly coupled systems as exemplified by the classical Kuramoto model. However, there are growing number of examples in which oscillators interact indirectly via a common external medium, including bacterial quorum sensing (QS) networks, pedestrians walking on a bridge, and centrally coupled lasers. In this paper we analyze the effects of stochastic phase resetting on a Kuramoto model with indirect coupling. All the phases are simultaneously reset to their initial values at a random sequence of times generated from a Poisson process. On the other hand, the external environmental state is not reset. We first derive a continuity equation for the population density in the presence of resetting and show how the resulting density equation is itself subject to stochastic resetting. We then use an Ott-Antonsen (OA) ansatz to reduce the infinite-dimensional system to a four-dimensional piecewise deterministic system with subsystem resetting. The latter is used to explore how synchronization depends on a cell density parameter. (In bacterial QS this represents the ratio of the population cell volume and the extracellular volume.) At high densities we recover the OA dynamics of the classical Kuramoto model with global resetting. On the other hand, at low densities, we show how subsystem resetting has a major effect on collective synchronization, ranging from noise-induced transitions to slow/fast dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.15534 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the Kuramoto model with (a) direct pairwise [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A schematic illustration of bacterial quorum sensing (QS) at the single [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Planar dynamics (4.17) on the OA manifold with resetting for ω0 = Ω and different values of the density: (a) σ0K = 10, (b) σ0K = 1, (c) σ0K = 0.01. Other parameters are r0 = 0.5, λ = 0.5, ∆ = 1, and K = 1. Black (dark) curves show r(t) and blue (light) curves show R(t). 0.8 0.2 r, R 0.4 0.0 0.6 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 time t (a) (b) 0 2 4 6 8 10 time t (c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Noise-induced transition between a pair of coherent states for the full [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Noise-induced transition from an incoherent state to a coherent states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Plots of the NESS q ∗ (r) given by Eq. (5.14) as a function of the order pa￾rameter r for different values of R0. (a) r+ < r0 = 0.5 for R0 = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0 and λ = 0.5 (black curves) or λ = 2 (red curves). (b) 0.5 = r0 < r+ for R0 = 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and λ = 0.5 (…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Plot of the slow amplitude R(t) in the low density regime for (a) λ = 0.5 and (b) λ = 1.5. Other parameters are R(0) = 0, ∆ = 1, K = 1, r0 = 0.5 and σ0 = 0.01. 17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Plots of the NESS q ∗ (r) given by Eq. (5.25) as a function of the order parameter r for various coupling strengths K, with r0 = 0.5, ∆ = 1, and λ = 1. and q ∗ (r) = 0 for r /∈ [0, r0], where α = λ 2∆ − K . (5.26) On the other hand, if K > Kc = 2∆ then q ∗ (r) = 2λ Kr3…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Schematic diagram showing a piecewise deterministic dynamical sys [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Phase plane diagram for a bistable system subject to resetting. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Modeling a synthetic multicellular clock: Repressilators coupled by quorum sensing

    J. Garcia-Ojalvo, M. B. Elowitz, and S. H. Strogatz, “Modeling a synthetic multicellular clock: Repressilators coupled by quorum sensing.” Proc. of the Natl. Acad. of Sci. 101 10955-10960 (2004)

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    A synchronized quo- rum of genetic clocks

    T. Danino, O. Mondragon-Palomino, L. Tsimring, and J. Hasty, “ A synchronized quo- rum of genetic clocks.” Nature 463 326-330 (2010)

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    Crowd synchrony on the Millennium Bridge

    S. Strogatz, D. Abrams, A. McRobie, B. Eckhardt, and E. Ott, “Crowd synchrony on the Millennium Bridge.” Nature 438 43-44 (2005)

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    Modeling walker syn- chronization on the Millennium Bridge

    B. Eckhardt, E. Ott, S. Strogatz, D. Abrams, and A. McRobie, “Modeling walker syn- chronization on the Millennium Bridge.” Phys. Rev. E 75 021110 (2007)

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    Crowd synchrony and quorum sensing in delay-coupled lasers

    J. Zamora-Munt, C. Masoller, J. Garcia-Ojalvo, and R. Roy, “Crowd synchrony and quorum sensing in delay-coupled lasers.” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 264101 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Opinion behavior analysis in social networks under the influence of cooperatitive media,

    D. Xue, S. Hirche and M. Cao, “Opinion behavior analysis in social networks under the influence of cooperatitive media,” IEEE Transactions on Network Science and En- gineering 7 961-974 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Pikovsky, M

    A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum and J. Kurths, Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences. Cambridge nonlinear science series, Cambridge (2003)

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Global convergence of quorum sensing network

    G. Russo and J. Slotine, “Global convergence of quorum sensing network.” Phys. Rev. E 82, 041919 (2010). 22

    work page 2010

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    Dynamical quorum-sensing in oscillators cou- pled through an external medium

    D. J. Schwab, A. Baetica and P. Mehta, “Dynamical quorum-sensing in oscillators cou- pled through an external medium.” Physica D 241 1782-1788 (2012)

    2012

  2. [10]

    Kuramoto model with coupling through an external medium

    D. J. Schwab, G. G. Plunk and P. Mehta “Kuramoto model with coupling through an external medium.” Chaos 22 043139 (2012)

    2012

  3. [11]

    Suppression and revival of oscillation in indirectly coupled limit cycle os- cillators

    P. R. Sharma, N. K. Kamal, U. K. Verma, K. Suresh, K.Thamilmaran and M. D.Shrimali, “Suppression and revival of oscillation in indirectly coupled limit cycle os- cillators.” Phys. Lett. A 380 3178-3184 (2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    Explosive death in nonlinear oscillators coupled by quorum sensing

    U. K. Verma, S. S. Chaurasia and S. Sinha, “Explosive death in nonlinear oscillators coupled by quorum sensing.” Phys. Rev. E 100 032203 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    Kuramoto Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence Springer (1984)

    Y. Kuramoto Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence Springer (1984)

    1984

  6. [14]

    From Kuramoto to Crawford: Exploring the onset of synchronization in populations of coupled oscillators

    S. H. Strogatz. “From Kuramoto to Crawford: Exploring the onset of synchronization in populations of coupled oscillators.” Physica D 143 1-20 (2000)

    2000

  7. [15]

    The Ku- ramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena

    J. A. Acebron, L. L. Bonilla, C. L. Perez Vicente, P. Ritort and R. Spigler. “The Ku- ramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena.” Rev. Mod. Phys. 77 137-185 (2005)

    2005

  8. [16]

    Low dimensional behavior of large systems of globally coupled oscillators

    E. Ott and T. M. Antonsen. “Low dimensional behavior of large systems of globally coupled oscillators.” Chaos 18 037113 (2008)

    2008

  9. [17]

    Exact results for the Kuramoto model with a bimodal frequency distribution

    E. Martens, E. Barreto, S. Strogatz, E. Ott, P. So, and T. Antonsen, “Exact results for the Kuramoto model with a bimodal frequency distribution.” Phys. Rev. E 79 026204 (2009)

    2009

  10. [18]

    Stochastic resetting in interacting particle systems: a review

    A. Nagar and S. Gupta. “Stochastic resetting in interacting particle systems: a review” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 56 283001 (58pp) (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Diffusion with stochastic resetting

    M. R. Evans and S. N. Majumdar. “Diffusion with stochastic resetting.” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 160601 (2011)

    2011

  12. [20]

    Diffusion with optimal resetting

    M. R. Evans and S. N. Majumdar. “Diffusion with optimal resetting.” J. Phys. A 44 435001 (2011)

    2011

  13. [21]

    Diffusion with resetting in arbitrary spatial dimen- sion

    M. R. Evans and S. N. Majumdar. “Diffusion with resetting in arbitrary spatial dimen- sion.” J. Phys. A 47 285001 (2014)

    2014

  14. [22]

    Stochastic resetting and applications

    M. R. Evans, S. N. Majumdar and G. Schehr. “Stochastic resetting and applications.” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 53 193001 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Synchronization in the Kuramoto model in presence of stochas- tic resetting

    M. Sarkar and S. Gupta. “Synchronization in the Kuramoto model in presence of stochas- tic resetting.” Chaos 32 073109 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    Global density equations for interacting particle systems with stochastic resetting: from overdamped Brownian motion to phase synchronization

    P. C. Bressloff, “Global density equations for interacting particle systems with stochastic resetting: from overdamped Brownian motion to phase synchronization.” Chaos 34, 043101 (2024). 23

    2024

  17. [25]

    Two distinct transitions in a population of coupled oscillators with turnover: desynchronization and stochastic oscillation quenching

    A. Ozawa and H. Kori, “Two distinct transitions in a population of coupled oscillators with turnover: desynchronization and stochastic oscillation quenching”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 047201 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Kuramoto model subject to subsystem resetting: How resetting a part of the system may synchronize the whole of it

    R. Majumder, R. Chattopadhyay and S. Gupta, “Kuramoto model subject to subsystem resetting: How resetting a part of the system may synchronize the whole of it.” Phys. Rev. E 109, 064137 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Cooperative phenomena in coupled oscillator systems under external fields

    H. Sakaguchi. “Cooperative phenomena in coupled oscillator systems under external fields.” Prog. Theor. Phys.79 39-46 (1988)

    1988

  20. [28]

    Stability of incoherence of a population of coupled oscillators

    S. H. Strogatz and R. E. Mirollo. “Stability of incoherence of a population of coupled oscillators.” J. Stat. Phys. 63 613-635 (1991)

    1991

  21. [29]

    Amplitude expansions for instabilities in populations of globally- coupled oscillators

    J. D. Crawford. “Amplitude expansions for instabilities in populations of globally- coupled oscillators.” J. Stat. Phys. 74 1047-1084 (1994)

    1994

  22. [30]

    Synchronization of globally coupled phase oscil- lators: Singularities and scaling for general couplings

    J. D. Crawford and K. T. R. Davies. “Synchronization of globally coupled phase oscil- lators: Singularities and scaling for general couplings.” Physica D 125 1-46 (1999)

    1999

  23. [31]

    McKean-Vlasov limit for interacting random processes in random media

    P. Dai Pra and F. den Hollander. “McKean-Vlasov limit for interacting random processes in random media.” J. Stat. Phys. 84 735-772 (1996)

    1996

  24. [32]

    Long-time behaviour and phase transitions for the McKean-Vlasov equation on the torus

    J. A. Carrillo, R. S. Gvalani, G. A. Pavliotis and A. Schlichting. “Long-time behaviour and phase transitions for the McKean-Vlasov equation on the torus.” Archive for Ra- tional Mechanics and Analysis 235 635-690 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    On the diffusive-mean field limit for weakly interacting diffusions exhibiting phase transitions

    M. G. Delgadino, R. S. Gvalani and G. A. Pavliotis. “On the diffusive-mean field limit for weakly interacting diffusions exhibiting phase transitions.” Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 241 91-148 (2021). 24

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.