Advances in understanding vacuum break dynamics in liquid helium-cooled tubes for accelerator beamline applications

Wei Guo; Yinghe Qi

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 81 references

Advances in understanding vacuum break dynamics in liquid helium-cooled tubes for accelerator beamline applications

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A 1D condensation-coupled model reproduces the nearly exponential deceleration of nitrogen gas fronts in liquid-helium-cooled beamline tubes, with superfluid He II slowing the front more strongly than He I, while a bulky-cavity experiment…

desk verdict A useful, clearly written review of the group's own prior work, but the model-validation claim is weaker than the paper's language suggests because the key heat-transfer parameters are tuned to the same experiments used for validation. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15668 v1 pith:KKBEWKGK submitted 2024-11-23 physics.acc-ph

Yinghe Qi , Wei Guo This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.acc-ph

keywords lossofvacuumcryopumpinggascondensationliquidheliumcoolingsuperfluidbeamlinesafetysuperconductingRFcavitypropagation

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review consolidates the authors' experimental and modeling campaign on what happens when room-temperature nitrogen rushes into an evacuated beamline tube cooled by liquid helium, the scenario of a sudden vacuum break in an accelerator. The central claim is that cryopumping does not merely slow the gas front; it makes the front decelerate nearly exponentially, with superfluid He II producing a stronger slowdown than normal He I. The paper argues that a one-dimensional model coupling gas conservation equations, a condensation-rate law, and steady-state helium heat-transfer correlations reproduces the measured wall-temperature histories and front-arrival times in uniform tubes, and that the same model yields quantitative heat-deposition and frost freeze-range predictions useful for safety design. It also reports that inserting a bulky cavity that mimics an SRF cavity produces strongly anisotropic nitrogen flow, so uniform-tube results cannot be extrapolated to real beamlines without a two-dimensional model.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the 1D condensation-coupled gas-dynamics model: Euler-type conservation equations for nitrogen mass, momentum, and energy with a wall mass sink $4\dot{m}_c/D_1$; the Schrage-modified Hertz-Knudsen relation for $\dot{m}_c$ (a law for how fast gas molecules stick to the cold frost surface), solved self-consistently with the Schrage parameter $\Gamma(\beta)$; a radial heat-transfer chain through the solid nitrogen frost layer and copper wall; and steady-state helium correlations, namely the Breen-Westwater film-boiling form $q_{He}=B_w\Delta T_w^{5/4}$ for He I and a Kapitza plus peak-flux/film-boiling treatment for He II, with $B_w$ and $\psi$ as the only tuned constants. This machinery converts the observed exponential deceleration into predictive statements about heat flux into the helium bath and the spatial extent of frost contamination.

What would settle it

Take the same helical-tube apparatus, change only the tube inner diameter or length, or vent air instead of pure nitrogen, keep $B_w$ and $\psi$ at their published values, and compare the measured rise-time curves and freeze-range endpoints with the model's predictions; systematic disagreement beyond experimental scatter would falsify the claim that the tuned model captures the physics. A second direct check is to measure the local heat flux into the He II bath with an array of calibrated thermometers rather than inferring it from wall-temperature histories, and test the predicted $q_{He}(t)$ plateau.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the authors' account, the key discovery is that the slowdown of a nitrogen front in a liquid-helium-cooled tube is a condensation-driven process that a 1D model can capture quantitatively: the front's rise time grows with distance so that the front speed falls roughly exponentially, and adding the Schrage-modified Hertz-Knudsen deposition rate $\dot{m}_c$ as a mass sink in the conservation equations, together with radial frost-layer conduction and heat-flux correlations for He I and He II, brings simulated wall temperatures and rise times into agreement with experiments at tank pressures from 50 to 200 kPa. The He II curves show markedly stronger deceleration, attributed to the bath's superior heat-removal capability. The model then predicts local heat deposition peaks above $10^2\,\mathrm{kW/m^2}$ at front arrival and a freeze-range correlation $x_F = a D_1^b \omega^c$ describing where propagation nearly halts, offering concrete numbers for accelerator safety design.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the empirical heat-removal formulas, with their constants adjusted to match the same experiments the model is checked against, truly represent how the helium bath cools the tube; if they do not generalize to other tube sizes, pressures, or cavity geometries, the model's agreement is a curve fit rather than independent evidence.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For uniform beamline tubes, the validated model gives design-relevant predictions: local wall heat fluxes peak above $10^2\,\mathrm{kW/m^2}$ when the gas front arrives, then decay as frost accumulates and the helium bath warms.
He II-cooled tubes decelerate the gas front more strongly than He I at the same inlet pressure, so superfluid-cooled sections can be expected to arrest a vacuum-break front sooner.
The freeze-range correlation $x_F = a D_1^b \omega^c$ provides a quantitative estimate of how far frost contamination will extend for a given inlet mass flow and tube diameter, which can guide placement of heaters, sensors, and relief ports.
The inserted-cavity result, where the downstream wall sensor warms before the cavity-side sensor, shows gas sweeps through the cavity before filling it, so a one-dimensional area-averaged model cannot predict condensation distribution in SRF-like geometries; the planned 2D model is meant to address this.
The model's heat-deposition histories, including the transition from the Kapitza regime to film boiling in He II, give concrete inputs for sizing cryomodule pressure-relief and interlock systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because $B_w$ and $\psi$ were tuned to the same experiments used for validation, the reported agreement is a consistency check rather than an independent test; a sharper test would fix these constants from separate steady-state heat-transfer measurements and then predict rise times in a new tube geometry.
The stronger He II deceleration likely means that the same high heat-removal capacity concentrates deposited heat into a shorter span of the helium bath; whether this raises local pressure rise faster than in He I is a natural next question.
The T4-before-Tc timing suggests the cavity acts as a stagnation chamber with a fast central jet and slower peripheral filling; this could be tested with a second pressure sensor at the cavity center or by visual frost-deposition tracking in a transparent mock cavity.
For real air rather than pure nitrogen, oxygen's different saturation pressure and frost properties will shift the freeze range, so adapting the correlation to mixed-gas composition is a direct extension for accelerator safety studies.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

What you should know: this is a review of the authors' own previously published work, not a new-results paper. The abstract says so, and the content follows through. The genuinely useful part is the consolidated account of the uniform-tube experiments: the near-exponential deceleration of the nitrogen front, the stronger slowing in He II, and the 1D model with its heat-transfer sub-models. That material is presented clearly and honestly, and the experimental observation itself looks solid - eight Cernox sensors across a 5.75 m helical tube, consistent behavior across pressure conditions. What it does well: it gives a reader in cryogenic accelerator safety a single place to see the setup, the data, the model equations, and the freeze-range correlation. The paper also explicitly discloses that Bw and psi were adjusted to get the best match, and that the cavity experiment is preliminary. That is more transparent than most work of this kind. The soft spot is the validation language. Section 3.3.3 says Bw and psi were tuned, and for He II psi varies with inlet mass flow rate (0.4 to 2), so the four He II curves in Fig. 3b are matched with an effective per-condition parameter. Calling the result "excellent agreement across all runs" overstates what an in-sample calibration can establish. The freeze-range correlation, Eq. 13 with fitted a, b, c, inherits the same issue because it comes from the same tuned model. This is a real limitation, but it is not fatal: the paper is an engineering model review, not a claim of independent prediction. The authors disclose the tuning, so a careful reader can correct the inference. The cavity result - temperature rising downstream of the cavity before the cavity wall - is a nice preliminary observation, but it is already published in Ref. [29] and the paper frames it as motivation for future 2D work. Who gets value: accelerator-cryogenics engineers and researchers who want a compact review of this group's work. It is not a groundbreaking contribution, but it is a competent, honest synthesis. Recommendation: I would send it to peer review, but ask the authors to soften the validation claims, explicitly state that Bw and psi are calibrated rather than independently determined, and ideally add a sentence about what independent data or code would be needed to turn the model from a fit into a predictive tool. With those revisions, it is a reasonable review article.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review-style article summarizing the authors' experimental and modeling work on nitrogen gas propagation in liquid-helium-cooled tubes following a sudden vacuum break. The authors report that, in uniform copper tubes, the nitrogen gas front decelerates nearly exponentially, with stronger deceleration in He II-cooled tubes than in He I-cooled tubes, as inferred from wall-temperature rise times at eight thermometers. They present a one-dimensional model coupling gas dynamics, Hertz-Knudsen condensation with the Schrage correction, frost-layer growth, and steady-state heat-transfer correlations to He I and He II, and they compare simulated wall-temperature and rise-time curves with the same experiments. The paper also describes a preliminary experiment with an inserted cylindrical cavity that shows anisotropic gas flow, motivating a planned 2D model, and it gives a forward-looking discussion of future multi-cavity studies.

Significance. If the model-validation claim were supported by independent evidence, the paper would be a useful synthesis for accelerator beamline safety: it connects rise-time data, heat deposition to the helium bath, and a freeze-range correlation into a practical engineering picture. The experimental setup is described in unusual detail, the data are presented clearly, and the authors are appropriately cautious about extrapolating to nonuniform geometries. The main weakness is that the model agreement is in-sample and partially circular: the heat-transfer coefficients Bw and psi are tuned to the same runs used for validation, and psi varies per inlet condition for He II. Consequently, the abstract's claim that the model 'successfully reproduced key experimental observations' overstates the evidence, and the heat-flux and freeze-range predictions inherit a calibration uncertainty that is not quantified. The experimental finding of near-exponential deceleration and stronger He II deceleration is, on its own, credible and well documented; the model claim is the fragile part.

major comments (3)

[Abstract; Section 3.3.3, Eqs. (10) and (12); Figs. 2 and 3] The central validation claim is weakened by in-sample tuning. Section 3.3.3 states that Bw in Eq. (10) and psi in Eq. (12) were adjusted to achieve the best match with the observed gas dynamics, and that for He II psi varied from 0.4 to 2 with inlet mass flow rate. Since psi changes the peak heat flux q*, which directly controls the transition into film boiling in He II, the four tank pressures in Fig. 3b are effectively reproduced with a per-condition free parameter. The 'excellent agreement' in Fig. 3 and the abstract's 'successfully reproduced' statement therefore establish internal consistency between the numerical scheme and the data, not independent predictive validity. Please either provide an out-of-sample test (for example, predictions at pressures or geometries not used to set Bw and psi, with psi fixed by a physical model) or reframe the paper's language from 'validated' to 'calibrated model consistent with the experiments', and propagate this caveat to the abstract and the freeze-range discussion.
[Section 3.3.3; Eq. (13); Table 2] The freeze-range correlation xF = a D1^b omega^c is presented as a robust result, but Table 2 identifies a, b, and c as optimal values fitted to simulation data from the same tuned model, not as measurements of freeze range in the experimental system. Because the underlying He II heat-transfer correlation already contains per-condition tuning, the predictive uncertainty of Eq. (13) is unknown and is not quantified by the fit. The paper should explicitly label Eq. (13) as a model-derived correlation requiring independent experimental validation, and it should report the fit residuals or a leave-one-out check rather than only the optimal parameter values.
[Section 3.3.2, Eq. (12); Section 3.3.3, Fig. 3] The empirical correction factor psi in the He II peak-flux correlation is varied with inlet mass flow rate without a stated physical scaling or independent measurement. Because the model's central qualitative result—stronger deceleration in He II—depends on the heat-flux model, the per-condition variation of psi could be absorbing model error rather than representing a real geometric or pressure effect. The paper should discuss whether psi can be predicted a priori (for instance, from bath pressure and tube geometry) or should at least report the sensitivity of the He II rise-time curves to psi within its fitted range.

minor comments (5)

[Title; throughout] The title contains a spacing error ('liquid h elium-cooled') that should be corrected before typesetting.
[Figures 4 and 8; Table 3] Several labels contain garbled placeholder-like strings such as 'N/two.denominator' and 'N/g3676'. These appear to be transcription artifacts and must be replaced with the intended notation for nitrogen gas.
[Nomenclature; Section 3.3.2] The nomenclature table lists psi with units kg/(m2·s), but psi is described as an empirical correction factor in Eq. (12); please verify the implied dimensions of that equation and define psi consistently.
[Section 3.2.2] The rise-time thresholds 4.7 K (He I) and 4.2 K (He II) are stated not to affect the results significantly, but no sensitivity analysis is shown; a short paragraph or a supplementary figure quantifying the variation of tr with threshold choice would make this robustness claim checkable.
[Section 4.1] The conclusion that temperature at T4 rises before Tc indicates gas flows through the cavity before filling it is plausible but relies on a single preliminary run with no uncertainty estimate; I suggest explicitly labeling this as a preliminary observation to be confirmed in the planned systematic study.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Model 'success' is in-sample: Bw and per-condition psi are tuned to the very runs used for 'validation'.

fitted input called prediction [Abstract; Section 3.3.3, Eqs. (10) and (12), Figs. 2 and 3]
"To achieve the best match between the simulated and observed gas dynamics, two parameters were adjusted: the coefficient Bw in Eq. 10, representing the Breen-Westwater correlation for He I film boiling heat flux, and the parameter psi in Eq. 12, describing the integral correlation of q* for He II. ... For He II experiments, where the immersion depth varies along the experimental tube, psi was found to depend on the inlet mass flow rate and ranged from 0.4 to 2 [28]. ..."

Eqs. (10) and (12) set the heat-removal boundary condition that controls the tube-wall temperature and therefore the gas-front rise time. The paper states that Bw and psi were 'adjusted' to 'achieve the best match' with the observed gas dynamics, and for He II, psi is separately varied with inlet mass flow rate (0.4 to 2), effectively giving a per-condition free parameter. The same experimental rise-time data thereby determine the free parameters used to generate the plotted simulated curves. The agreement is an in-sample fit or consistency check, not an independent prediction. Calling it 'excellent agreement' and saying the model 'successfully replicates' the dynamics overstates what a tuned comparison can establish.

full rationale

The directly measured experimental findings - nearly exponential deceleration of the nitrogen front and stronger deceleration in He II - are supported by Cernox temperature-sensor data and are not circular. The circularity is confined to the model-validation claim in the abstract and Section 3.3.3. There, the paper discloses that Bw in Eq. (10) and psi in Eq. (12) were adjusted for the best match to the observed gas dynamics, with psi ranging from 0.4 to 2 as the He II inlet mass flow rate changes. Since these parameters set the heat flux to the helium bath, which controls condensation and front speed, the resulting agreement in Figs. 2 and 3 demonstrates numerical self-consistency rather than predictive success. The freeze-range correlation, Eq. (13) with fitted a, b, c in Table 2, is explicitly a fit to simulation data from this same tuned model, so it cannot serve as external support for the model. The paper partly discloses the tuning, but the wording 'validated against experimental data' and 'successfully reproduced key experimental observations' overstates the strength of an in-sample comparison. No load-bearing self-citation chain or imported uniqueness theorem is present; this is a review of the authors' own prior experimental and modeling work. Score 6 because the central model-success claim reduces partly by construction, while the core experimental observations remain independent.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The experiments stand independently, but the model's quantitative outputs rest on two fitted heat-transfer coefficients, a fitted freeze-range correlation, and literature-based empirical correlations (Sieder-Tate, Hertz-Knudsen, Kapitza, film boiling). This makes the model agreement partly dependent on tuning and reduces the strength of the derived heat-flux and freeze-range numbers.

free parameters (3)

Bw, Breen-Westwater film boiling coefficient for He I = 0.021 W/(cm2·K5/4)
Tuned to match He I experiment data; Eq. 10, Section 3.3.3.
psi, peak heat flux correlation parameter for He II = 0.4 to 2, depending on inlet mass flow rate
Tuned per experimental run to match He II data; Eq. 12, Section 3.3.3.
Freeze-range correlation coefficients a, b, c = He I: a=0.074, b=0.915, c=1.084; He II: a=0.018, b=1.023, c=1.395
Fitted to simulation data in Ref [39]; Eq. 13 and Table 2.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Ideal-gas equation of state for N2 applies throughout the experiment.
Section 3.3.1, Eq. 5; justified by compressibility close to unity per Ref [27].
domain assumption Steady-state empirical heat-transfer correlations describe heat flux from the tube wall to He I and He II baths.
Section 3.3.2 assumes helium thermal relaxation is fast relative to gas propagation and applies correlations like Eqs. 10-12.
domain assumption Hertz-Knudsen relation with Schrage modification and sigma_c = sigma_e = 0.95 gives the mass deposition rate.
Section 3.3.1, Eq. 6; coefficients adopted from Ref [42] rather than measured in this work.
domain assumption Sieder-Tate correlation provides the Nusselt number for convective heat transfer to the gas.
Eq. 4 in Section 3.3.1, standard correlation from Ref [40].
domain assumption Wall temperature rise above thresholds (4.7 K for He I, 4.2 K for He II) marks arrival of the gas front.
Section 3.2.2; thresholds chosen arbitrarily and reported to be insensitive to model fitting results.
domain assumption Standard k-epsilon turbulence model represents turbulent flow in the proposed 2D model.
Section 4.2, Eq. 16 and Ref [79].

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Advances in understanding vacuum break dynamics in liquid helium-cooled tubes for accelerator beamline applications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KKBEWKGK

@misc{pith2026241115668,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Advances in understanding vacuum break dynamics in liquid helium-cooled tubes for accelerator beamline applications},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KKBEWKGK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15668}
}

read the original abstract

Understanding air propagation and condensation following a catastrophic vacuum break in particle accelerator beamlines cooled by liquid helium is essential for ensuring operational safety. This review summarizes experimental and theoretical work conducted in our cryogenics lab to address this issue. Systematic measurements were performed to study nitrogen gas propagation in uniform copper tubes cooled by both normal liquid helium (He I) and superfluid helium (He II). These experiments revealed a nearly exponential deceleration of the gas front, with stronger deceleration observed in He II-cooled tubes. To interpret these results, a one-dimensional (1D) theoretical model was developed, incorporating gas dynamics, heat transfer, and condensation mechanisms. The model successfully reproduced key experimental observations in the uniform tube system. However, recent experiments involving a bulky copper cavity designed to mimic the geometry of a superconducting radio-frequency (SRF) cavity revealed strong anisotropic flow patterns of nitrogen gas within the cavity, highlighting limitations in extrapolating results from simplified tube geometries to real accelerator beamlines. To address these complexities, we outline plans for systematic studies using tubes with multiple bulky cavities and the development of a two-dimensional (2D) model to simulate gas dynamics in these more intricate configurations. These efforts aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of vacuum breaks in particle accelerators and improve predictive capabilities for their operational safety.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.15668 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Comparison of the calculated and measured wall tem [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Measured and simulated rise times as a function of p [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (5 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Schematic illustrating of (a) GN2 propagation and deposition in a LHe-cooled vacuum tube and (b) radial heat transfer through the frost layer and tube wall, copied from [27]. the frost-layer surface temperature Ts . The coefficients σc and σe are empirical condensation…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Representative correlation curves show the heat fl [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Schematic of the new vacuum break system with an inl [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Simulated heat flux deposited to (a) the tube wall ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Schematic illustrating of (a) GN2 propagation and deposition in a LHe-cooled vacuum tube with an inline cylindrical cavity and (b) mass transfer calculation for the 2D model. a strong foundation for this field. Nevertheless, further work is necessary to address the com…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

[29]

Garceau, S

N. Garceau, S. Bao, W. Guo, V acuum break in a helium coole d tube with an inserted cavity, in: International Cryogenic Engineeri ng Conference and International Cryogenic Materials Conference, Spring er, 2022, pp. 413–419

work page 2022
[1]

Design Topics for Superconducting RF Cavities and Ancillaries

H. Padamsee, Design topics for superconducting RF cavit ies and ancil- laries, arXiv preprint arXiv:1501.07129 (2015)

work page Pith review arXiv 2015
[2]

S. M. Harrison, Loss of vacuum experiments on a superﬂuid helium ves- sel, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 12 (20 02) 1343–
[3]

Petitpas, S

G. Petitpas, S. M. Aceves, Modeling of sudden hydrogen expansion from cryogenic pressure vessel failure, Interna - tional Journal of Hydrogen Energy 38 (2013) 8190–8198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.03.166

work page doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.03.166 2013
[4]

Heidt, S

C. Heidt, S. Grohmann, M. S¨ ußer, Modeling the pressure i ncrease in liquid helium cryostats after failure of the insulating vac uum, in: AIP Conference Proceedings, volume 1573, American Institute o f Physics, 2014, pp. 1574–1580

work page 2014
[5]

GF. Xie, XD. Li, RS. Wang, Study on the heat trans- fer of high-vacuum-multilayer-insulation tank after sudd en, catas- trophic loss of insulating vacuum, Cryogenics 50 (2010) 682 –687. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2010.06.020

work page doi:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2010.06.020 2010
[6]

M. Ady, D. Ziemianski, G. V andoni, R. Kersevan, M. Herman n, Leak propagation dynamics for the HIE-ISOLDE superconducting l inac, Tech- nical Report, CERN, 2014

work page 2014
[7]

Bajko, F

M. Bajko, F. Bertinelli, Catalan-Lasheras et al., Repor t of the task force on the incident of 19th September 2008 at the LHC, Technical R eport, CERN, Geneva, 2009

work page 2008

Show all 81 references

[8]

Seidel, D

M. Seidel, D. Trines, K. Zapfe, Failure analysis of the be am vacuum in the superconducting cavities of the TESLA main linear accelerator, Technical Report, Dt. Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY , MHF-SL Group, 2002

2002
[9]

Wiseman, K

M. Wiseman, K. Crawford, M. Drury, K. Jordan, J. Preble, Q . Saulter, W. Schneider, Loss of cavity vacuum experiment at CEBAF, Adv ances in cryogenic engineering (1994) 997–1003

1994
[10]

Wiseman, R

M. Wiseman, R. Bundy, J. P . Kelley, W. Schnei- der, CEBAF cryounit loss of vacuum experiment, Ap- plications of Cryogenic Technology (1991) 287–303. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9232-4$\_$24

1991 doi
[11]

E. F. Toro, Riemann solvers and numerical methods for ﬂu id dynamics: A practical introduction, Springer Science & Business Medi a, 2013

2013
[12]

A. H. Shapiro, The dynamics and thermodynamics of compr essible ﬂuid ﬂow, New Y ork: Ronald Press 2 (1953)

1953
[13]

Bosque, Transient heat transfer to helium II due to a s udden loss of insulating vacuum, Ph.D

E. Bosque, Transient heat transfer to helium II due to a s udden loss of insulating vacuum, Ph.D. thesis, The Florida State Univers ity, 2014

2014
[14]

Welch, Capture pumping technology, Elsevier, 2001

K. Welch, Capture pumping technology, Elsevier, 2001

2001
[15]

Dawson, JD

JP. Dawson, JD. Haygood, Cryopumping, Cryogenics 5 (19 65) 57–67
[16]

Rogers, Experimental investigations of solid nitr ogen formed by cryopumping, Technical Report, NA TIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRA TION, 1966

KW. Rogers, Experimental investigations of solid nitr ogen formed by cryopumping, Technical Report, NA TIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRA TION, 1966

1966
[17]

Tantos, S

C. Tantos, S. Naris, D. V alougeorgis, Gas ﬂow to- wards an adsorbing planar wall subject to partial gas- surface thermal accommodation, V acuum 125 (2016) 65–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2015.12.002

2016 doi
[18]

Brown, DM

RF. Brown, DM. Trayer, MR. Busby, Condensation of 300– 2500 K gases on surfaces at cryogenic temperatures, Jour- nal of V acuum Science and Technology 7 (1970) 241–246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1116/1.1315808

1970 doi
[19]

Boeckmann, D

T. Boeckmann, D. Hoppe, K. Jensch, R. Lange, W. Maschman n, B. Pe- tersen, T. Schnautz, Experimental tests of fault condition s during the cryogenic operation of a XFEL prototype cryomodule, in: Pro ceedings of International Cryogenic Engineering Conference, volume 22, HM Chan...

2008
[20]

A. A. Dalesandro, R. C. Dhuley, J. C. Theilacker, S. W. V a n Sciver, Re- sults from sudden loss of vacuum on scaled superconducting r adio fre- quency cryomodule experiment, in: AIP Conference Proceedi ngs, vol- ume 1573, American Institute of Physics, 2014, pp. 1822–182 8

2014
[21]

Dhuley, SW

RC. Dhuley, SW. V an Sciver, Propagation of nitrogen gas in a liquid helium cooled vacuum tube following sudden vac- uum loss–part II: Analysis of the propagation speed, Intern a- tional Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 98 (2016) 728–737. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatm...

2016 doi
[22]

Dhuley, SW

RC. Dhuley, SW. V an Sciver, Propagation of nitrogen gas in a liq- uid helium cooled vacuum tube following sudden vacuum loss– part I: Experimental investigations and analytical modeling, I nter- national Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 96 (2016) 573–581 . doi:https://doi.or...

2016 doi
[23]

R. C. Dhuley, Gas propagation in a liquid helium cooled v acuum tube fol- lowing a sudden vacuum loss, Ph.D. thesis, The Florida State University, 2016

2016
[24]

Garceau, S

N. Garceau, S. Bao, W. Guo, SW. V an Sciver, The design and testing of a liquid helium cooled tube system for simulating sudden vacuum loss in particle accelerators, Cryogenics 100 (2019 ) 92–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2019.04.012

2019 doi
[25]

Garceau, S

N. Garceau, S. Bao, W. Guo, Heat and mass transfer dur- ing a sudden loss of vacuum in a liquid helium cooled tube– part I: Interpretation of experimental observations, Inte rna- tional Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 129 (2019) 1144–115 0. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhe...

2019 doi
[26]

Garceau, S

N. Garceau, S. Bao, W. Guo, E ﬀect of mass ﬂow rate on gas propagation after vacuum break in a liquid helium cooled tube., in: IOP Co nference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, volume 755, IOP Publishing, 2020, p. 012112

2020
[27]

S. Bao, N. Garceau, W. Guo, Heat and mass transfer during a sudden loss of vacuum in a liquid helium cooled tube–part II: Theoretica l modeling, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 146 (2020) 1 18883. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.118883

2020
[28]

Garceau, S

N. Garceau, S. Bao, W. Guo, Heat and mass transfer during a sudden loss of vacuum in a liquid helium cooled tube-part III: Heat d eposition in he II, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 181 (2021) 121885. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121885

2021
[30]

A. A. Dalesandro, J. Theilacker, S. V an Sciver, Experim ent for tran- sient e ﬀects of sudden catastrophic loss of vacuum on a scaled super- conducting radio frequency cryomodule, in: AIP Conference Proceed- ings, volume 1434, American Institute of Physics, 2012, pp. 1567–157...

2012 doi
[31]

A. A. Dalesandro, R. C. Dhuley, J. C. Theilacker, S. W. V a n Sciver, Results from sudden loss of vacuum on scaled superconductin g radio frequency cryomodule experiment, in: AIP Conference Proce edings, volume 1573, American Institute of Physics, 2014, pp. 1822– 1828. doi:htt...

2014 doi
[32]

A. A. Dalesandro, J. Theilacker, S. V an Sciver, Experim ent for transient eﬀects of sudden catastrophic loss of vacuum on a scaled superconducting radio frequency cryomodule, in: AIP Conference Proceeding s, volume 1434, American Institute of Physics, 2012, pp. 1567–1574

2012
[33]

R. C. Dhuley, S. W. V an Sciver, Sudden vacuum loss in long liquid helium cooled tubes, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 25 (2014) 1–5

2014
[34]

Dhuley, E

R. Dhuley, E. Bosque, S. V an Sciver, Cryodeposition of n itrogen gas on a surface cooled by helium II, in: AIP Conference Proce ed- ings, volume 1573, American Institute of Physics, 2014, pp. 626–632. doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4860760

2014 doi
[35]

Dhuley, S

R. Dhuley, S. V an Sciver, Heat transfer in a liquid heliu m cooled vacuum tube following sudden vacuum loss, in: IOP Conference Serie s: Materials Science and Engineering, volume 101, IOP Publishing, 2015, p. 012006. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/101/1/012006

2015 doi
[36]

Web accessed Feb 2019

National Institute of Standards and Technology, Therm odynamics source database: Nitrogen in NIST chemistry webbook, SRD 69 , https://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry, 2019. Web accessed Feb 2019

2019
[37]

Dhuley, S

R. Dhuley, S. V an Sciver, Epoxy encapsulation of the Cer - nox™ SD thermometer for measuring the temperature of surfaces in liquid helium, Cryogenics 77 (2016) 49–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2016.05.001

2016 doi
[38]

S. W. V an Sciver, Helium Cryogenics, International cry ogenics mono- graph series, 2nd ed., Springer, New Y ork, 2012

2012
[39]

S. Bao, Y . Tang, Q. Rababah, W. Guo, Freeze range of a condensing gas propagating in a liquid helium-cooled tube , Thermal Science and Engineering Progress 47 (2024) 102328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2023.102328

2024
[40]

F. P . Incropera, D. P . Dewitt, T. L. Bergman, A. S. Lavine , Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, 6 ed., John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, U SA, 2007

2007
[41]

Collier, J

J. Collier, J. Thome, Convective boiling and condensat ion, 3rd ed., Ox- ford University Press, New Y ork, 1994

1994
[42]

A. H. Persad, C. A. Ward, Expressions for the evap- oration and condensation coe ﬃcients in the Hertz- Knudsen relation, Chem. Rev. 116 (2016) 7727–7767. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00511

2016 doi
[43]

Stephan, R

K. Stephan, R. Krauss, A. Laesecke, Viscosity and therm al con- ductivity of nitrogen for a wide range of ﬂuid states, Jour- nal of physical and chemical reference data 16 (1987) 993–10 23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.555798

1987 doi
[44]

T. A. Scott, Solid and liquid nitrogen, Physics Reports 27 (1976) 89–157

1976
[45]

T. Cook, G. Davey, The density and thermal conductivity of solid nitrogen and carbon dioxide, Cryogenics 16 (1976) 363 –369. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2275(76)90217-4

1976 doi
[46]

Flynn, Cryogenic engineering, CRC Press, 2004

T. Flynn, Cryogenic engineering, CRC Press, 2004

2004
[47]

Lemmon, M

E. Lemmon, M. L. Huber, M. O. McLinden, NIST standard ref erence database 23: reference ﬂuid thermodynamic and transport pr operties- REFPROP, version 8.0, 2007

2007
[48]

V . Arp, R. McCarty, F. Je ﬀrey, HEPAK, 2005

2005
[49]

S. W. V an Sciver, Helium Cryogenics, International cry ogenics mono- graph series, 2 ed., Springer, New Y ork, USA, 2012

2012
[50]

S. R. Bao, W. Guo, Transient heat transfer of superﬂuid 4He in nonhomogeneous geometries: Second sound, rarefac- tion, and thermal layer, Phys. Rev. B 103 (2021) 134510. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.134510

2021 doi
[51]

Sanavandi, M

H. Sanavandi, M. Hulse, S. R. Bao, Y . Tang, W. Guo, Boiling and cavitation caused by transient heat transfer in superﬂuid helium-4, Phys. Rev. B 106 (2022) 054501. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.054501

2022 doi
[52]

Smith, Review of heat transfer to helium I, Cryogenic s 9 (1969) 11–19

R. Smith, Review of heat transfer to helium I, Cryogenic s 9 (1969) 11–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2275(69)90251-3

1969 doi
[53]

Lantz, Heat transfer correlations between a heated s urface and liquid superﬂuid helium, Thesis, Link¨ opings universitet, Link¨ oping, Sweden, 2007

J. Lantz, Heat transfer correlations between a heated s urface and liquid superﬂuid helium, Thesis, Link¨ opings universitet, Link¨ oping, Sweden, 2007

2007
[54]

Zuber, M

N. Zuber, M. Tribus, J. Westwater, The hydrodynamic cri sis in pool boil- ing of saturated and subcooled liquids, in: Proceeding of 19 61-62 Interna- tional Heat Transfer Conference, volume 2 of International development in heat transfer, ASME, Boulder, USA, 1961, pp. 230–236

1961
[55]

B. P . Breen, J. W. Westwater, E ﬀect of diameter of horizontal tubes on ﬁlm boiling heat transfer, Chemical Engineering Progress 5 8 (1962) 67– 72

1962
[56]

W. F. Vinen, Mutual friction in a heat current in liquid h elium II III. Theory of the mutual friction, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 242 (1957 ) 493–

1957
[57]

K. W. Schwarz, Turbulence in superﬂuid helium: Steady h o- mogeneous counterﬂow, Phys. Rev. B 18 (1978) 245–262. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.18.245

1978 doi
[58]

K. P . Martin, J. T. Tough, Evolution of superﬂuid turbul ence in thermal counterﬂow, Phys. Rev. B 27 (1983) 2788–2799. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.27.2788

1983 doi
[59]

G. P . Bewley, M. S. Paoletti, K. R. Sreenivasan, D. P . Lat h- rop, Characterization of reconnecting vortices in superﬂu id he- lium, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105 (2008) 13707–13710. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0806002105

2008 doi
[60]

T. V . Chagovets, S. W. V an Sciver, A study of thermal coun terﬂow using particle tracking velocimetry, Phys. Fluids 23 (2011 ) 107102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3657084

2011 doi
[61]

Mineda, M

Y . Mineda, M. Tsubota, Y . A. Sergeev, C. F. Barenghi, W. F . Vi- nen, V elocity distributions of tracer particles in thermal coun- terﬂow in superﬂuid 4he, Phys. Rev. B 87 (2013) 174508. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.174508

2013 doi
[62]

ˇSvanˇ cara, P

P . ˇSvanˇ cara, P . Hrubcov´ a, M. Rotter, M. La Mantia, Vi- sualization study of thermal counterﬂow of superﬂuid he- lium in the proximity of the heat source by using solid deu- terium hydride particles, Phys. Rev. Fluids 3 (2018) 114701 . doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev...

2018 doi
[63]

Marakov, J

A. Marakov, J. Gao, W. Guo, S. W. V an Sciver, G. G. Ihas, D. N. McKinsey, W. F. Vinen, Visualization of the normal-ﬂuid tur bulence in counterﬂowing superﬂuid 4He, Phys. Rev. B 91 (2015) 094503. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.094503

2015 doi
[64]

J. Gao, W. Guo, V . S. L’vov, A. Pomyalov, L. Skrbek, E. V arga, W. F. Vinen, Decay of counterﬂow turbu- 11 lence in superﬂuid 4He, JETP Lett. 103 (2016) 648–652. doi:https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364016100064

2016 doi
[65]

S. Bao, W. Guo, Quench-spot detection for supercon- ducting accelerator cavities via ﬂow visualization in supe r- ﬂuid helium-4, Phys. Rev. Applied 11 (2019) 044003. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.044003

2019 doi
[66]

Murakami, S

M. Murakami, S. Takada, M. Nozawa, Study of He II boiling ﬂow ﬁeld around a heater, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 101 (2015) 0 12165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/101/1/012165

2015 doi
[67]

Claudet, P

G. Claudet, P . Seyfert, Bath cooling with subcooled sup erﬂuid helium, Adv. Cryog. Eng. 27 (1981) 441

1981
[68]

Kashani, S

A. Kashani, S. W. V an Sciver, High heat ﬂux Kapitza conductance of technical copper with several di ﬀerent surface preparations, Cryogenics 25 (1985) 238–242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2275(85)90202-4

1985 doi
[69]

S. W. V an Sciver, R. Lee, Heat transfer to helium-II in cylindrical geometries, in: Adv. Cryog. Eng., vol- ume 35, Springer US, Boston, MA., 1980, pp. 363–371. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9856-1\_43

1980 doi
[70]

J. S. Goodling, R. K. Irey, Non-boiling and ﬁlm boiling h eat transfer to a saturated bath of liquid helium, in: Adv. Cryog. Eng., vo lume 14, Springer US, Boston, MA, 1969, pp. 159–169

1969
[71]

Bretts, A

K. Bretts, A. Leonard, Free convection ﬁlm boiling from a ﬂat, horizontal surface in saturated He II, in: Adv. in Cryog . Eng., volume 21, Springer US, Boston, MA., 1975, pp. 282–292 . doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0208-8\_37

1975 doi
[72]

Danaila, P

I. Danaila, P . Joly, S. M. Kaber, M. Postel, An introduct ion to scien- tiﬁc computing: Twelve computational projects solved with MA TLAB, Springer-V erlag, New Y ork, USA, 2007

2007
[73]

G. A. Sod, A survey of several ﬁnite di ﬀerence meth- ods for systems of nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws, Journal of Computational Physics 27 (1978) 1–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(78)90023-2

1978 doi
[74]

Darve, P

C. Darve, P . Bosland, G. Devanz, G. Olivier, B. Renard, J .-P . Thermeau, The ESS elliptical cavity cryomodules, in: AIP Conference P roceed- ings, volume 1573, American Institute of Physics, 2014, pp. 639–646. doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4860762

2014 doi
[75]

H. Dylla, Development of ultrahigh vacuum technology f or particle accelerators and magnetic fusion devices, Journal of V acuu m Science & Technology A: V acuum, Surfaces, and Films 12 (1994) 962–97 8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1116/1.579074

1994 doi
[76]

Padamsee, RF superconductivity: Science, technolo gy, and applica- tions (2009 wiley, 2009

H. Padamsee, RF superconductivity: Science, technolo gy, and applica- tions (2009 wiley, 2009

2009
[77]

Padamsee, J

H. Padamsee, J. Knobloch, T. Hays, RF superconductivit y for accelera- tors, John Wiley & Sons, 2008

2008
[78]

Garceau, Heat and Mass Transfer during a Sudden Loss o f V acuum in a Liquid Helium Cooled Tube, Ph.D

N. Garceau, Heat and Mass Transfer during a Sudden Loss o f V acuum in a Liquid Helium Cooled Tube, Ph.D. thesis, The Florida State University, 2022

2022
[79]

Launder, Lectures in mathematical models of turbule nce, 1972

B. Launder, Lectures in mathematical models of turbule nce, 1972. Nomenclature V ariable Description Units Bw Coeﬃcient in the ﬁlm boil- ing correlation of He I W/(cm2· K5/4) c0 Speed of sound m /s C Speciﬁc heat J /(kg·K) D1 Inner diameter of the tube m D2 Outer diameter of t...

1972
[515]

doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1957.0191

1957
[1346]

doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2002.1018651

2002 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [29]

Garceau, S

N. Garceau, S. Bao, W. Guo, V acuum break in a helium coole d tube with an inserted cavity, in: International Cryogenic Engineeri ng Conference and International Cryogenic Materials Conference, Spring er, 2022, pp. 413–419

work page 2022

[2] [1]

Design Topics for Superconducting RF Cavities and Ancillaries

H. Padamsee, Design topics for superconducting RF cavit ies and ancil- laries, arXiv preprint arXiv:1501.07129 (2015)

work page Pith review arXiv 2015

[3] [2]

S. M. Harrison, Loss of vacuum experiments on a superﬂuid helium ves- sel, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 12 (20 02) 1343–

[4] [3]

Petitpas, S

G. Petitpas, S. M. Aceves, Modeling of sudden hydrogen expansion from cryogenic pressure vessel failure, Interna - tional Journal of Hydrogen Energy 38 (2013) 8190–8198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.03.166

work page doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.03.166 2013

[5] [4]

Heidt, S

C. Heidt, S. Grohmann, M. S¨ ußer, Modeling the pressure i ncrease in liquid helium cryostats after failure of the insulating vac uum, in: AIP Conference Proceedings, volume 1573, American Institute o f Physics, 2014, pp. 1574–1580

work page 2014

[6] [5]

GF. Xie, XD. Li, RS. Wang, Study on the heat trans- fer of high-vacuum-multilayer-insulation tank after sudd en, catas- trophic loss of insulating vacuum, Cryogenics 50 (2010) 682 –687. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2010.06.020

work page doi:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2010.06.020 2010

[7] [6]

M. Ady, D. Ziemianski, G. V andoni, R. Kersevan, M. Herman n, Leak propagation dynamics for the HIE-ISOLDE superconducting l inac, Tech- nical Report, CERN, 2014

work page 2014

[8] [7]

Bajko, F

M. Bajko, F. Bertinelli, Catalan-Lasheras et al., Repor t of the task force on the incident of 19th September 2008 at the LHC, Technical R eport, CERN, Geneva, 2009

work page 2008