A review of geometric modeling methods in microstructure design and manufacturing

Guoyue Luo; Qiang Zou

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 273 references

A review of geometric modeling methods in microstructure design and manufacturing

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review organizes geometric modeling of microstructures into a three-level taxonomy and identifies large-scale representational compactness as the field's central bottleneck.

desk verdict A genuinely useful taxonomy and survey of microstructure geometric modeling, undercut by a few unverifiable quantitative claims and an unstated selection method. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15833 v1 pith:SNAROOCH submitted 2024-11-24 cs.CG cond-mat.mtrl-scics.GR

Qiang Zou , Guoyue Luo This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.CGcond-mat.mtrl-scics.GR

keywords CAD/CAMAdditiveManufacturingGeometricModelingMicrostructuresRepresentationsAlgorithmslatticestructurestaxonomy

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review maps the field of geometric modeling for microstructures and argues that the main obstacle is not algorithmic sophistication but scale: conventional CAD representations cannot store or process models with millions to billions of elements. It organizes the literature into a three-level taxonomy—boundary-conformed versus non-conformal, regular versus semi-regular versus irregular topology, and beam- versus shell- versus solid-based cells—and frames progress around four challenges: representational compactness, computational efficiency, computational robustness, and multiscale integrity. A sympathetic reader would take the review's central claim to be that the field's next advances will come from compressive and generative representations, plus parallel and hybrid modeling algorithms, rather than from refining existing B-rep approaches.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a three-level taxonomy paired with a four-challenge evaluation grid. The taxonomy sorts microstructures by macro-level boundary behavior (conformed or trimmed), meso-level topological regularity (regular, semi-regular, irregular), and micro-level cell geometry (beam, shell, solid); the challenges—representational compactness, computational efficiency, computational robustness, and multiscale integrity—are the yardsticks against which the review measures every representation scheme and modeling algorithm. This pairing lets the authors transform a scattered literature into a terrain map with open problems marked, and it drives their recommendations: procedural/program-based representations for regular structures, implicit and hybrid representations for robustness, streaming and GPU computing for scale, and compressive or generative representations for the future.

What would settle it

A concrete way to test the taxonomy: find a published microstructure modeling method whose cell geometry is neither beam-based, shell-based, nor solid-based, or whose topology fits none of regular, semi-regular, or irregular (for example, a representation that mixes cell types along a continuum without a global topological descriptor). If such a method is generally used, the three-level taxonomy would fail to cover the field. Testing the challenge claim is harder, but a large-scale user study or literature count showing that, say, parameter control or material anisotropy appears in the title/abstract of most recent microstructure papers more often than the four named challenges would suggest the review's priority list is off.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is organizational: it is the first review to cover all geometric modeling methods for microstructures under one framework, and it uses that framework to show that the field's hard part is scaling. The authors identify the 'model data explosion problem' as the defining gap: lattice structures with tens of billions of trusses would need terabytes of memory under B-rep, so the field requires representations that store generation rules or compressed patterns instead of explicit geometry. They classify every method by what it stores (topology and geometry at three levels) and evaluate it against the four challenges, concluding that semi-regular microstructures are an underexplored middle ground and that multiscale integrity during editing is almost untouched.

Load-bearing premise

The review's map is only as good as its bins: it assumes every microstructure can be sorted into the three-level taxonomy and that the four named challenges are the primary bottlenecks, so if any real microstructure falls outside these categories—or another challenge dominates the field—the conclusions and future directions would be incomplete.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Semi-regular microstructures are the promising middle ground, balancing mechanical diversity with compact representation and efficient computation, so they deserve more attention than regular or fully irregular types.
Current representations handle regular and small-scale microstructures but break down for semi-regular/irregular and large-scale ones, so demonstrations on toy examples do not transfer to real CS/HCS models.
Future progress will come from compressive and on-demand generative representations, not from incremental B-rep improvements, because the data explosion problem is fundamental to explicit boundary storage.
GPU parallel computing and hybrid implicit/explicit modeling are the likely routes to efficiency and robustness for billion-element models, addressing both memory divergence and degeneracy issues.
Multiscale integrity during editing is essentially unsolved; no dedicated change-propagation methods exist, so boundary shape edits can produce dangling or isolated pieces in the microstructure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because the review identifies compact representations as the path to scale, implicit neural representations—continuous functions learned from samples rather than explicit geometry—are a natural candidate the paper does not consider; their memory cost is independent of element count.
The taxonomy could be stress-tested by trying to slot every unit cell in the metamaterials literature into the beam/shell/solid trichotomy; any widely used design that falls outside (for instance, a genuine 0D particle or a continuum heterogeneous material) would force a revision.
The multiscale-integrity gap implies that future CAD systems need bi-directional, physics-aware propagation of edits across scales; today's parametric and direct modeling systems only support one-way or no propagation.
A benchmark suite of CS/HCS microstructure models with standardized memory, time, and robustness metrics would convert the review's qualitative claims about representational compactness into testable numbers.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Zou and Luo have written the first review I know that treats microstructure geometric modeling as a subfield with its own vocabulary, rather than as an appendix to lattice-structure surveys. The three-level taxonomy—boundary-conformed vs. non-conformal, regular/semi-regular/irregular, beam/shell/solid—is a genuinely useful organizing device, and the split between representation schemes and modeling algorithms makes it easy to find where a particular method sits. The four named challenges (compactness, efficiency, robustness, multiscale integrity) are a reasonable anchor for future work. If I were new to this area, I would start here.

The paper is honest about scope. It explicitly declines to cover optimization and process planning, and the conclusion acknowledges that omissions are possible. Section 6.4 goes so far as to say no dedicated method for multiscale integrity exists yet, which is the right way to handle a topic that is mostly open.

The soft spots are real but not fatal. Two quantitative claims should not survive review as written. The 6.4 TB estimate in Sect. 2.1 assumes ~10^11 trusses for a 0.1 m cube at 0.1 mm spacing; a straightforward count gives more like 10^9–10^10 trusses, making the estimate high by an order of magnitude. And the 'over 90% of Boolean and blending operations failed' claim in Sect. 6.3 is attributed to the authors' experience with Siemens NX and CATIA but has no instrumented method or source; it reads as anecdote. These numbers will be quoted, so they need to be fixed or removed.

The bigger concern is the comprehensiveness claim. The abstract says 'comprehensive, state-of-the-art' but no systematic search protocol is reported: no databases, dates, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or screening flow. The one keyword search described (Footnote 1) feeds the publication-count statistics in Fig. 2, not the paper-selection process. So the taxonomy and the challenge framing rest on an unverifiable sample. A biased selection could produce a map that misses whole threads of the field. A referee should ask the authors to describe their selection methodology or soften the claim.

The citation pattern looks fine; the self-citations are to their own genuinely relevant prior work, used as evidence rather than as load-bearing support for the review's conclusions. The taxonomy is a scheme, not an empirical discovery, and it does not need to be uniquely correct to be useful.

Who should read this: researchers and practitioners in CAD/AM who want an entry point to microstructure geometric modeling, and anyone deciding where to invest in this area. It deserves serious peer review—the taxonomy and organization alone are worth publishing—but it needs the numerical fixes and a methodological paragraph before I would sign off.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a literature review of geometric modeling methods for microstructures used in design and manufacturing. It proposes a three-level taxonomy (macro-level boundary-conformed vs non-conformal, meso-level regular/semi-regular/irregular, micro-level beam/shell/solid), surveys representation schemes and modeling algorithms, and distills four challenges (representational compactness, computational efficiency, computational robustness, multiscale integrity). The authors argue that current CAD representations and algorithms do not scale to complex/highly complex microstructures (millions to billions of elements) and conclude with future directions such as compressive and on-demand generative representations.

Significance. If the comprehensiveness claim holds, this review fills a gap by providing a structured map of geometric modeling for microstructures, complementing existing reviews focused on mechanics, optimization, or manufacturing. The paper's strengths are its clear organization, the useful tables (Tables 1–3) that give readers a quick entry into the literature, the attention to both design- and manufacturing-oriented operations, and the explicit identification of open problems. The inclusion of recent and less-central topics (e.g., streaming/out-of-core methods, GPU parallelism, persistent-homology-based slicing) is valuable. However, the central 'comprehensive, state-of-the-art' claim is currently not verifiable because the literature-selection process is not reported, and several quantitative claims that motivate the four challenges are unsupported or incorrect. These issues do not invalidate the qualitative framework, but they need to be repaired before the review can serve as a reliable map of the field.

major comments (4)

[Section 2.1] The 6.4 TB memory estimate for a 0.1 m cube of 0.1 mm trusses is based on 'roughly 1011 trusses', but a 0.1 m cube at 0.1 mm cell size contains 1000^3 = 10^9 nodes and on the order of 10^9–10^10 trusses depending on the lattice topology, not 10^11. This overestimate is load-bearing because it is used to define the HCS (highly complex structures) category and to argue that such models exceed CAD capabilities. Please correct the arithmetic or clearly state the assumed truss density. The related anecdote that Siemens NX 2306 took more than 4 hours to generate a 10 mm hex-star lattice on an i5/16 GB machine also lacks a repeatable protocol; consider moving it to a footnote or marking it explicitly as a non-benchmark observation.
[Section 6.3] The claim that 'over 90% of Boolean and blending operations failed' is attributed to 'the authors’ experience using Siemens NX and CATIA', but no protocol, sample size, definition of failure, or supporting reference is provided. This quantitative claim is used to justify the computational robustness challenge, so it should either be substantiated with a systematic experiment report or replaced by a qualitative statement citing existing literature on the prevalence of degenerate cases (tangencies, overlaps, coincident geometry) in Boolean and blending operations.
[Sections 1, 3, and 7] The central claim of being 'comprehensive, state-of-the-art' is not supported by a reproducible literature-selection methodology. Footnote 1 describes only the keyword sets used to generate the publication-count statistics in Fig. 2; it does not specify the databases, search dates, inclusion/exclusion criteria, screening procedure, or the number of papers screened and retained for the qualitative review in Sects. 4 and 5. Without this information, readers cannot verify that the reference set is representative. This is particularly important because the proposed three-level taxonomy (Sect. 3) and the four challenges (Sect. 2.2) are inferred from the selected body of work. The authors’ statement in the Conclusion that 'unintentional omissions' may have occurred does not substitute for a documented selection process. A short methods subsection describing the literature search and screening criteria should be added.
[Section 3] The claim that the taxonomy is 'a unified three-level taxonomy encompassing all microstructure types' is asserted rather than demonstrated. The macro-level dichotomy (boundary-conformed vs non-conformal) and the micro-level trichotomy (beam/shell/solid) may not be mutually exclusive or exhaustive: a TPMS structure can be both boundary-conformed and shell-based, and a Voronoi foam can be irregular at the meso level while having solid-based cells. The review does not define the classification rules that would allow a reader to classify any given microstructure, nor does it discuss edge cases. If the taxonomy is intended as a working framework rather than a formal classification, this should be stated explicitly; otherwise the comprehensiveness claim is weakened.

minor comments (4)

[Section 5.1.2] In the Booleans paragraph, 'especially when it comes to SS and HCS modeling' should likely read 'CS and HCS modeling' (or 'from SS to HCS'), because SS refers to simple structures that are generally handled by existing methods.
[Section 5.2.4] The terms 'space-filling paths' and 'space-infilling paths' are used inconsistently across the text, Table 3, and Fig. 19; please choose one term and use it consistently.
[Figure 3] The diagram in Fig. 3 contains the words 'Govern Examine Examine' placed in a confusing layout; this appears to be a leftover from template editing and should be cleaned up so the conceptual framework is readable.
[References] Reference [181] is incomplete (missing volume, article number, and year in the visible entry), and several other references (e.g., [133], [193]) also lack full bibliographic details; please check the reference list for completeness.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review's taxonomy, challenges, and future directions are organizational and evaluative claims, not derived from fitted inputs or self-citation chains.

full rationale

This paper is a literature review and contains no mathematical derivation or fitted-parameter prediction chain to be circular. The central outputs—the three-level taxonomy (Sect. 3), the four challenges (Sect. 2.2), the classification of representations and algorithms (Sects. 4–5), and the future directions (Sect. 6)—are organizational and evaluative claims, not quantities derived from inputs. The authors' own prior works (e.g., [27] and [61]) are cited as examples of existing methods, such as streaming-based slicing and meta-meshing of large-scale lattices, and as sources of experimental observations; these citations support factual statements but do not define the taxonomy or force the conclusions. The 6.4 TB memory estimate in Sect. 2.1 is an independent back-of-envelope calculation, and the 'over 90% of Boolean and blending operations failed' remark in Sect. 6.3 is reported anecdotal experience; neither is a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The conclusion's disclaimer about possible omissions is a limitation statement, not evidence of circularity. Any concern about unverifiable comprehensiveness or unreproducible statistics is a correctness or reproducibility issue, not circularity under the enumerated patterns.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review's central claim of comprehensiveness rests on organizational assumptions: the chosen taxonomy is exhaustive, the four challenges are the primary ones, and the characterization of CAD limitations is accurate. These are editorial judgments, not results derived from the cited literature, and they shape the entire review.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption Microstructures can be exhaustively classified by a three-level taxonomy (macro boundary, meso topology, micro cell geometry).
Invoked in Sect. 3 to structure the review; if some microstructures span categories or fall outside, the organization is incomplete.
domain assumption The four challenges (representational compactness, computational efficiency, computational robustness, multiscale integrity) are the primary issues in microstructure modeling.
Stated in Sect. 2.2 as 'the primary challenge' and three more challenges; these choices are not derived from data but from the authors' synthesis.
domain assumption Conventional CAD (B-rep/CSG) is fundamentally inadequate for large-scale microstructures.
The premise of the 'model data explosion' argument in Sect. 2.1; backed by anecdotal performance reports but treated as a fact throughout.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A review of geometric modeling methods in microstructure design and manufacturing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SNAROOCH

@misc{pith2026241115833,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A review of geometric modeling methods in microstructure design and manufacturing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SNAROOCH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15833}
}

read the original abstract

Microstructures, characterized by intricate structures at the microscopic scale, hold the promise of important disruptions in the field of mechanical engineering due to the superior mechanical properties they offer. One fundamental technique of microstructure design and manufacturing is geometric modeling, which generates the 3D computer models required to run high-level procedures such as simulation, optimization, and process planning. There is, however, a lack of comprehensive discussions on this body of knowledge. The goal of this paper is to compile existing microstructure modeling methods and clarify the challenges, progress, and limitations of current research. It also concludes with future research directions that may improve and/or complement current methods, such as compressive and generative microstructure representations. By doing so, the paper sheds light on what has already been made possible for microstructure modeling, what developments can be expected in the near future, and which topics remain problematic.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.15833 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Typical microstructure applications: (a) aerospace industry; (b) biomedical industry; and (c) applications in heat, noise canceling, or energy absorption. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Conceptual framework of this paper. Sect. 2.1. To bridge this gap, several critical challenges must be addressed, including representational compactness, computational efficiency, computational robustness, and multiscale integrity. These challenges will be detailed further in Sect. 2.2. 2.1. The gaps between microstructure modeling and manufacturing The capabilities of CAD tools have historically been shaped and … view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (17 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Microstructure design and manufacturing pipeline. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: The modeling consistency issue of Siemens NX. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Microstructure examples: (a)(b) lattice structures; (c)(d) TPMS structures; (e)(f) shell-based structures; and (g)(h) foam structures ((g) is from [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: The three-level taxonomy of microstructures. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Example of program-based regular microstructure representation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Semi-regular topology transition: (a) natural transition; and (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png]

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: Beam shape variants: (a) axis-curved beams [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png]

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: Illustrations of surface-based representations: (a) mesh-based lattice structures [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png]

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: Illustration of volume-based representations: (a) voxel-based lattice structure [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png]

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: Illustrations of implicits-based representations: (a) TPMS shape control with trigonometric equations [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_14.png]

**Figure 15.** Figure 15: Microstructure process planning pipeline. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_15.png]

**Figure 16.** Figure 16: Examples of microstructure slicing methods: (a) slicing accelerated by quadtrees, fast querying, and out-of-core methods [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_16.png]

**Figure 17.** Figure 17: Typical support structures: (a) column support; (b) lattice support [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_17.png]

**Figure 18.** Figure 18: Self-supported microstructures: (a) self-supported unit cells [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_18.png]

**Figure 19.** Figure 19: Illustration of typical path patterns. directly impacts surface finish, speed, and strength of prints. From a purely geometric point of view, path infilling generates a series of paths within each slice so that printed material (characterized by printing strip widths…

**Figure 20.** Figure 20: Examples of infilling paths for microstructures: (a) directional-parallel paths [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_20.png]

**Figure 21.** Figure 21: Number of components of conventional solids (a) V.S. modern mi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_21.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

273 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

[1]

Singh, H

N. Singh, H. Siddiqui, B. S. R. Koyalada, A. Mandal, V . Chauhan, S. Natarajan, S. Kumar, M. Goswami, S. Kumar, Recent advancements in additive manufacturing (AM) techniques: A forward-looking review, Metals and Materials International 29 (8) (2023) 2119–2136

2023
[2]

S. M. H. Hashemi, U. Babic, P. Hadikhani, D. Psaltis, The potentials of additive manufacturing for mass production of electrochemical energy systems, Current Opinion in Electrochemistry 20 (SI) (2020) 54–59

2020
[3]

M. K. Thompson, G. Moroni, T. Vaneker, G. Fadel, R. I. Campbell, I. Gibson, A. Bernard, J. Schulz, P. Graf, B. Ahuja, F. Martina, De- sign for additive manufacturing: Trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints, CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 65 (2) (2016) 737–760

2016
[4]

Al Rashid, S

A. Al Rashid, S. A. Khan, S. G. Al-Ghamdi, M. Koc, Additive manu- facturing: Technology, applications, markets, and opportunities for the built environment, Automation in Construction 118 (2020) 103268

2020
[5]

Z. Qin, G. S. Jung, M. J. Kang, M. J. Buehler, The mechanics and de- sign of a lightweight three-dimensional graphene assembly, Science Ad- vances 3 (1) (2017) e1601536

2017
[6]

S. O. Obadimu, K. Kourousis, I, Compressive behaviour of additively manufactured lattice structures: A review, Aerospace 8 (8) (2021) 207

2021
[7]

G. Dong, Y . Tang, Y . F. Zhao, A survey of modeling of lattice struc- tures fabricated by additive manufacturing, Journal of Mechanical De- sign 139 (10) (2017) 100906. 23

2017
[8]

du Plessis, N

A. du Plessis, N. Razavi, M. Benedetti, S. Murchio, M. Leary, M. Wat- son, D. Bhate, F. Berto, Properties and applications of additively man- ufactured metallic cellular materials: A review, Progress in Materials Science 125 (2022) 100918

2022

Show all 273 references

[9]

D. Chen, K. Gao, J. Yang, L. Zhang, Functionally graded porous struc- tures: Analyses, performances, and applications - a review, Thin-Walled Structures 191 (2023) 111046

2023
[10]

C. Pan, Y . Han, J. Lu, Design and optimization of lattice structures: A review, Applied Sciences-Basel 10 (18) (2020) 6374

2020
[11]

J. Feng, J. Fu, Z. Lin, C. Shang, B. Li, A review of the design methods of complex topology structures for 3D printing, Visual Computing for Industry Biomedicine and Art 1 (1) (2018) 5

2018
[12]

Nazir, K

A. Nazir, K. M. Abate, A. Kumar, J.-Y . Jeng, A state-of-the-art review on types, design, optimization, and additive manufacturing of cellular structures, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technol- ogy 104 (9-12) (2019) 3489–3510

2019
[13]

Noronha, J

J. Noronha, J. Dash, M. Leary, M. Watson, M. Qian, E. Kyriakou, M. Brandt, Additively manufactured functionally graded lattices: De- sign, mechanical response, deformation behavior, applications, and in- sights, JOM 75 (12) (2023) 5729–5754

2023
[14]

Almesmari, A

A. Almesmari, A. N. Alagha, M. M. Naji, J. Sheikh-Ahmad, F. Jarrar, Recent advancements in design optimization of lattice-structured mate- rials, Advanced Engineering Materials 25 (17) (2023) 2201780

2023
[15]

Helou, S

M. Helou, S. Kara, Design, analysis and manufacturing of lattice struc- tures: an overview, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manu- facturing 31 (3) (2018) 243–261

2018
[16]

M. E. Korkmaz, M. K. Gupta, G. Robak, K. Moj, G. M. Krolczyk, M. Kunto˘glu, Development of lattice structure with selective laser melt- ing process: A state of the art on properties, future trends and challenges, Journal of Manufacturing Processes 81 (2022) 1040–1063

2022
[17]

G. P. Borikar, A. R. Patil, S. B. Kolekar, Additively manufactured lat- tice structures and materials: Present progress and future scope, Inter- national Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing 24 (11) (2023) 2133–2180

2023
[18]

Almesmari, N

A. Almesmari, N. Baghous, C. J. Ejeh, I. Barsoum, R. K. Abu Al-Rub, Review of additively manufactured polymeric metamaterials: Design, fabrication, testing and modeling, Polymers 15 (19) (2023) 3858

2023
[19]

Y . Liu, G. Zheng, N. Letov, Y . F. Zhao, A survey of modeling and opti- mization methods for multi-scale heterogeneous lattice structures, Jour- nal of Mechanical Design 143 (4) (2021) 040803

2021
[20]

Letov, P

N. Letov, P. T. Velivela, S. Sun, Y . F. Zhao, Challenges and opportuni- ties in geometric modeling of complex bio-inspired three-dimensional objects designed for additive manufacturing, Journal of Mechanical De- sign 143 (12) (2021) 121705

2021
[21]

Lipson, Design in the age of 3-D printing, Mechanical Engineering 134 (10) (2012) 30

H. Lipson, Design in the age of 3-D printing, Mechanical Engineering 134 (10) (2012) 30

2012
[22]

Zou, H.-Y

Q. Zou, H.-Y . Feng, S. Gao, Variational direct modeling: A framework towards integration of parametric modeling and direct modeling in CAD, Computer-Aided Design 157 (2023) 103465

2023
[23]

A. A. Requicha, H. B. V oelcker, Solid modeling: a historical summary and contemporary assessment, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applica- tions 2 (02) (1982) 9–24

1982
[24]

Solid modeling association, http://solidmodeling.org/ trades-cp/, accessed: 2023-12-15

2023
[25]

Allen, Geometric modeling topics, in: Siemens PLM Components Innovation Conference, 2016, pp

G. Allen, Geometric modeling topics, in: Siemens PLM Components Innovation Conference, 2016, pp. 1–10

2016
[26]

Shapiro, Solid modeling, Handbook of Computer Aided Geometric Design 20 (2002) 473–518

V . Shapiro, Solid modeling, Handbook of Computer Aided Geometric Design 20 (2002) 473–518

2002
[27]

S. Liu, T. Liu, Q. Zou, W. Wang, E. L. Doubrovski, C. C. L. Wang, Memory-efficient modeling and slicing of large-scale adaptive lattice structures, Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineer- ing 21 (6) (2021) 061003

2021
[28]

M. Lee, Q. Fang, Y . Cho, J. Ryu, L. Liu, D.-S. Kim, Support-free hol- lowing for 3D printing via voronoi diagram of ellipses, Computer-Aided Design 101 (2018) 23–36

2018
[29]

Savio, S

G. Savio, S. Rosso, R. Meneghello, G. Concheri, Geometric modeling of cellular materials for additive manufacturing in biomedical field: A review, Applied Bionics and Biomechanics 2018 (2018) 1654782

2018
[30]

Tamburrino, S

F. Tamburrino, S. Graziosi, M. Bordegoni, The design process of ad- ditively manufactured mesoscale lattice structures: A review, Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 18 (4) (2018) 040801

2018
[31]

Massarwi, J

F. Massarwi, J. Machchhar, P. Antolin, G. Elber, Hierarchical, ran- dom and bifurcation tiling with heterogeneity in micro-structures con- struction via functional composition, Computer-Aided Design 102 (SI) (2018) 148–159

2018
[32]

Nguyen, S

J. Nguyen, S. in Park, D. W. Rosen, L. Folgar, J. Williams, Confor- mal lattice structure design and fabrication, in: 2012 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 2012, pp. 138–161

2012
[33]

M. Lei, P. Wang, S. Duan, W. Wen, J. Liang, Novel conformal sandwich lattice structures: Design concept, fabrication and mechanical proper- ties, Thin-Walled Structures 199 (2024) 111806

2024
[34]

van Sosin, D

B. van Sosin, D. Rodin, H. Sliusarenko, M. Barton, G. Elber, The con- struction of conforming-to-shape truss lattice structures via 3D sphere packing, Computer-Aided Design 132 (2021) 102962

2021
[35]

Groth, C

J.-H. Groth, C. Anderson, M. Magnini, C. Tuck, A. Clare, Five simple tools for stochastic lattice creation, Additive Manufacturing 49 (2022) 102488

2022
[36]

Gomez, M

S. Gomez, M. D. Vlad, J. Lopez, E. Fernandez, Design and properties of 3D scaffolds for bone tissue engineering, Acta Biomaterialia 42 (2016) 341–350

2016
[37]

Gupta, K

A. Gupta, K. Kurzeja, J. Rossignac, G. Allen, P. S. Kumar, S. Musu- vathy, Programmed-lattice editor and accelerated processing of paramet- ric program-representations of steady lattices, Computer-Aided Design 113 (2019) 35–47

2019
[38]

Y . Liu, S. Zhuo, Y . Xiao, G. Zheng, G. Dong, Y . F. Zhao, Rapid model- ing and design optimization of multi-topology lattice structure based on unit-cell library, Journal of Mechanical Design 142 (9) (2020) 091705

2020
[39]

Leonardi, S

F. Leonardi, S. Graziosi, R. Casati, F. Tamburrino, M. Bordegoni, Addi- tive manufacturing of heterogeneous lattice structures: an experimental exploration, in: Proceedings of the Design Society: International Con- ference on Engineering Design, V ol. 1, 2019, pp. 669–678

2019
[40]

Yoo, K.-H

D.-J. Yoo, K.-H. Kim, An advanced multi-morphology porous sca ffold design method using volumetric distance field and beta growth function, International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing 16 (9) (2015) 2021–2032

2015
[41]

Letov, Y

N. Letov, Y . F. Zhao, Beam-based lattice topology transition with function representation, Journal of Mechanical Design 145 (1) (2023) 011704

2023
[42]

Al-Ketan, R

O. Al-Ketan, R. K. A. Al-Rub, MSLattice: A free software for gen- erating uniform and graded lattices based on triply periodic minimal surfaces, Material Design & Processing Communications 3 (6) (2021) e205

2021
[43]

Tricard, V

T. Tricard, V . Tavernier, C. Zanni, J. Martinez, P.-A. Hugron, F. Neyret, S. Lefebvre, Freely orientable microstructures for designing deformable 3D prints, ACM Transactions on Graphics 39 (6) (2020) 211

2020
[44]

shape-DNA

L. Wang, Y .-C. Chan, Z. Liu, P. Zhu, W. Chen, Data-driven metamaterial design with Laplace-Beltrami spectrum as “shape-DNA”, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 61 (6) (2020) 2613–2628

2020
[45]

Wang, Y .-C

L. Wang, Y .-C. Chan, F. Ahmed, Z. Liu, P. Zhu, W. Chen, Deep gener- ative modeling for mechanistic-based learning and design of metamate- rial systems, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 372 (2020) 113377

2020
[46]

Kumar, S

S. Kumar, S. Tan, L. Zheng, D. M. Kochmann, Inverse-designed spin- odoid metamaterials, NPJ Computational Materials 6 (1) (2020) 73

2020
[47]

C. S. Ha, D. Yao, Z. Xu, C. Liu, H. Liu, D. Elkins, M. Kile, V . Desh- pande, Z. Kong, M. Bauchy, X. R. Zheng, Rapid inverse design of meta- materials based on prescribed mechanical behavior through machine learning, Nature Communications 14 (1) (2023) 5765

2023
[48]

Zheng, K

L. Zheng, K. Karapiperis, S. Kumar, D. M. Kochmann, Unifying the design space and optimizing linear and nonlinear truss metamaterials by generative modeling, Nature Communications 14 (1) (2023) 7563

2023
[49]

Schumacher, B

C. Schumacher, B. Bickel, J. Rys, S. Marschner, C. Daraio, M. Gross, Microstructures to control elasticity in 3D printing, ACM Transactions on Graphics 34 (4) (2015) 136

2015
[50]

B. Zhu, M. Skouras, D. Chen, W. Matusik, Two-scale topology opti- mization with microstructures, ACM Transactions on Graphics 36 (5) (2017) 164

2017
[51]

D. Lee, W. W. Chen, L. Wang, Y .-C. Chan, W. Chen, Data-driven design for metamaterials and multiscale systems: A review, Advanced Materi- als 36 (8) (2024) 2305254

2024
[52]

Lee, Y .-C

D. Lee, Y .-C. Chan, W. W. Chen, L. Wang, A. van Beek, W. Chen, 24 t-METASET: Task-aware acquisition of metamaterial datasets through diversity-based active learning, Journal of Mechanical Design 145 (3) (2023) 031704

2023
[53]

K. L. Snapp, B. Verdier, A. E. Gongora, S. Silverman, A. D. Ade- siji, E. F. Morgan, T. J. Lawton, E. Whiting, K. A. Brown, Superlative mechanical energy absorbing efficiency discovered through self-driving lab-human partnership, Nature Communications 15 (1) (2024) 4290

2024
[54]

Q. Y . Hong, G. Elber, Conformal microstructure synthesis in trimmed trivariate based V-reps, Computer-Aided Design 140 (2021) 103085

2021
[55]

Biswas, V

A. Biswas, V . Shapiro, I. Tsukanov, Heterogeneous material modeling with distance fields, Computer Aided Geometric Design 21 (3) (2004) 215–242

2004
[56]

Elber, Precise construction of micro-structures and porous geometry via functional composition, in: Mathematical Methods for Curves and Surfaces, 2017, pp

G. Elber, Precise construction of micro-structures and porous geometry via functional composition, in: Mathematical Methods for Curves and Surfaces, 2017, pp. 108–125

2017
[57]

Maurizi, C

M. Maurizi, C. Gao, F. Berto, Inverse design of truss lattice materials with superior buckling resistance, NPJ Computational Materials 8 (1) (2022) 247

2022
[58]

Chougrani, J.-P

L. Chougrani, J.-P. Pernot, P. Veron, S. Abed, Lattice structure lightweight triangulation for additive manufacturing, Computer-Aided Design 90 (SI) (2017) 95–104

2017
[59]

Y . Tang, G. Dong, Y . F. Zhao, A hybrid geometric modeling method for lattice structures fabricated by additive manufacturing, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 102 (9-12) (2019) 4011–4030

2019
[60]

W. Wang, D. Feng, L. Yang, S. Li, C. C. L. Wang, Topology optimization of self-supporting lattice structure, Additive Manufacturing 67 (2023) 103507

2023
[61]

Q. Zou, Y . Gao, G. Luo, S. Chen, Meta-meshing and triangulating lattice structures at a large scale, Computer-Aided Design (2024) 103732

2024
[62]

Fantini, M

M. Fantini, M. Curto, F. De Crescenzio, A method to design biomimetic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering based on voronoi lattices, Virtual and Physical Prototyping 11 (2) (2016) 77–90

2016
[63]

Lei, J.-R

H.-Y . Lei, J.-R. Li, Z.-J. Xu, Q.-H. Wang, Parametric design of voronoi- based lattice porous structures, Materials & Design 191 (2020) 108607

2020
[64]

Martinez, J

J. Martinez, J. Dumas, S. Lefebvre, Procedural Voronoi foams for addi- tive manufacturing, ACM Transactions on Graphics 35 (4) (2016) 44

2016
[65]

H. Wang, Y . Chen, D. W. Rosen, A hybrid geometric modeling method for large scale conformal cellular structures, in: Proceedings of The ASME International Design Engineering Techinical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 2005, pp. 421– 427

2005
[66]

H. Wang, D. W. Rosen, Parametric modeling method for truss structures, in: International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Com- puters and Information in Engineering Conference, V ol. 36215, 2002, pp. 759–767

2002
[67]

Huang, F

J. Huang, F. Chang, E ffects of curved cell edges on the sti ffness and strength of two-dimensional cellular solids, Composite Structures 69 (2) (2005) 183–191

2005
[68]

Srinivasan, E

V . Srinivasan, E. Mandal, E. Akleman, Solidifying wireframes, in: Re- naissance Ban ff: Mathematics, Music, Art, Culture, Bridges Confer- ence, 2005, pp. 203–210

2005
[69]

Y . Chen, A mesh-based geometric modeling method for general struc- tures, in: International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, V ol. 42578, 2006, pp. 269–281

2006
[70]

Chen, 3D texture mapping for rapid manufacturing, Computer-Aided Design and Applications 4 (6) (2007) 761–771

Y . Chen, 3D texture mapping for rapid manufacturing, Computer-Aided Design and Applications 4 (6) (2007) 761–771

2007
[71]

C. Chu, G. Graf, D. W. Rosen, Design for additive manufacturing of cel- lular structures, Computer-Aided Design and Applications 5 (5) (2008) 686–696

2008
[72]

X. Feng, K. Xia, Z. Chen, Y . Tong, G.-W. Wei, Multiscale geometric modeling of macromolecules ii: Lagrangian representation, Journal of Computational Chemistry 34 (24) (2013) 2100–2120

2013
[73]

D.-J. Yoo, Heterogeneous porous sca ffold design for tissue engineering using triply periodic minimal surfaces, International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing 13 (4) (2012) 527–537

2012
[74]

D.-J. Yoo, Computer-aided porous scaffold design for tissue engineering using triply periodic minimal surfaces, International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing 12 (1) (2011) 61–71

2011
[75]

Pasko, O

A. Pasko, O. Fryazinov, T. Vilbrandt, P.-A. Fayolle, V . Adzhiev, Proce- dural function-based modelling of volumetric microstructures, Graphi- cal Models 73 (2011) 165–181

2011
[76]

Fryazinov, T

O. Fryazinov, T. Vilbrandt, A. Pasko, Multi-scale space-variant FRep cellular structures, Computer-Aided Design 45 (1, SI) (2013) 26–34

2013
[77]

Panetta, A

J. Panetta, A. Rahimian, D. Zorin, Worst-case stress relief for mi- crostructures, ACM Transactions on Graphics 36 (4) (2017) 122

2017
[78]

V ongbunyong, S

S. V ongbunyong, S. Kara, Rapid generation of uniform cellular struc- ture by using prefabricated unit cells, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 30 (8) (2017) 792–804

2017
[79]

Dumas, P

M. Dumas, P. Terriault, V . Brailovski, Modelling and characterization of a porosity graded lattice structure for additively manufactured biomate- rials, Materials & Design 121 (2017) 383–392

2017
[80]

A. O. Aremu, J. P. J. Brennan-Craddock, A. Panesar, I. A. Ashcroft, R. J. M. Hague, R. D. Wildman, C. Tuck, A voxel-based method of con- structing and skinning conformal and functionally graded lattice struc- tures suitable for additive manufacturing, Additive Manufacturing 13...

2017
[81]

Liang, F

Y . Liang, F. Zhao, D.-J. Yoo, B. Zheng, Design of conformal lattice structures using the volumetric distance field based on parametric solid models, Rapid Prototyping Journal 26 (6) (2020) 1005–1017

2020
[82]

A. H. Azman, F. Vignat, F. Villeneuve, D. S. Nguyen, Creation of lattice structures with skeleton model for additive manufacturing, International Journal of Interactive Design and Manufacturing 15 (4) (2021) 381–396

2021
[83]

Y . Tang, Y . Xiong, S.-i. Park, G. Boddeti, D. Rosen, Generation of lattice structures with convolution surface, in: Proceedings of the 16th annual International CAD Conference, 2019, pp. 24–26

2019
[84]

J. C. McCaw, E. Cuan-Urquizo, Curved-layered additive manufactur- ing of non-planar, parametric lattice structures, Materials & Design 160 (2018) 949–963

2018
[85]

L. Bai, Y . Xu, X. Chen, L. Xin, J. Zhang, K. Li, Y . Sun, Improved me- chanical properties and energy absorption of Ti6Al4V laser powder bed fusion lattice structures using curving lattice struts, Materials & Design 211 (2021) 110140

2021
[86]

Y . Fu, W. Liu, Design of mechanical metamaterial with controllable stiffness using curved beam unit cells, Composite Structures 258 (2021) 113195

2021
[87]

G. Feng, S. Li, L. Xiao, W. Song, Energy absorption performance of honeycombs with curved cell walls under quasi-static compression, In- ternational Journal of Mechanical Sciences 210 (2021) 106746

2021
[88]

S. Cao, J. Wu, Y . Lai, Z. Shen, J. Liu, R. Bo, J. Chang, Z. Wang, Y . Zhang, A phenomenological framework for modeling of nonlinear mechanical responses in soft network materials with arbitrarily curved microstructures, Extreme Mechanics Letters 55 (2022) 101795

2022
[89]

Gupta, G

A. Gupta, G. Allen, J. Rossignac, Quador: Quadric-of-revolution beams for lattices, Computer-Aided Design 102 (SI) (2018) 160–170

2018
[90]

Gupta, G

A. Gupta, G. Allen, J. Rossignac, Exact representations and geometric queries for lattice structures with quador beams, Computer-Aided De- sign 115 (2019) 64–77

2019
[91]

S. S. Mustafa, I. Lazoglu, A new model and direct slicer for lattice struc- tures, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 63 (5) (2021) 2211– 2230

2021
[92]

Zhang, S

L. Zhang, S. Feih, S. Daynes, Y . Wang, M. Y . Wang, J. Wei, W. F. Lu, Buckling optimization of kagome lattice cores with free-form trusses, Materials & Design 145 (2018) 144–155

2018
[93]

Y . Wu, A. Gupta, K. Kurzeja, J. Rossignac, CHoCC: Convex hull of cospherical circles and applications to lattices, Computer-Aided Design 129 (2020) 102903

2020
[94]

C. S. Verma, B. Rankouhi, K. Suresh, A combinatorial approach for con- structing lattice structures, Journal of Mechanical Design 142 (4) (2020) 041404

2020
[95]

Savio, R

G. Savio, R. Meneghello, G. Concheri, Geometric modeling of lattice structures for additive manufacturing, Rapid Prototyping Journal 24 (2) (2018) 351–360

2018
[96]

Savio, R

G. Savio, R. Meneghello, G. Concheri, Design of variable thickness triply periodic surfaces for additive manufacturing, Progress in Additive Manufacturing 4 (3) (2019) 281–290

2019
[97]

Letov, Y

N. Letov, Y . F. Zhao, V olumetric cells: A framework for a bio-inspired geometric modelling method to support heterogeneous lattice struc- tures, Proceedings of the Design Society: Design Conference 1 (2020) 295–304

2020
[98]

Frayssinet, L

E. Frayssinet, L. Colabella, A. P. Cisilino, Design and assessment of the 25 biomimetic capabilities of a voronoi-based cancellous microstructure, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 130 (2022) 105186

2022
[99]

H. Chen, Y . Guo, R. Rostami, S. Fan, K. Tang, Z. Yu, Porous structure design using parameterized hexahedral meshes and triply periodic mini- mal surfaces, in: Proceedings of Computer Graphics International 2018, Association for Computing Machinery, 2018, pp. 117–128

2018
[100]

S. Wang, Y . Jiang, J. Hu, X. Fan, Z. Luo, Y . Liu, L. Liu, E fficient rep- resentation and optimization of TPMS-based porous structures for 3D heat dissipation, Computer-Aided Design 142 (2022) 103123

2022
[101]

J. Ding, Q. Zou, S. Qu, P. Bartolo, X. Song, C. C. Wang, STL-free de- sign and manufacturing paradigm for high-precision powder bed fusion, CIRP Annals 70 (1) (2021) 167–170

2021
[102]

B. Xu, X. Gu, J. Wang, Y . Zhang, J. Zhu, W. Zhang, Deformation con- trol method for active shape morphing lattice structure using topology optimization approach, Smart Materials and Structures 33 (2) (2024) 025006

2024
[103]

Armanfar, E

A. Armanfar, E. Gunpinar, G-lattices: A novel lattice structure and its generative synthesis under additive manufacturing constraints, Journal of Mechanical Design 145 (1) (2023) 011702

2023
[104]

Xiong, R

W. Xiong, R. Pan, C. Yan, M. He, Q. Chen, S. Li, X. Chen, L. Hao, Y . Li, Subdivisional modelling method for matched metal additive manufac- turing and its implementation on novel negative poisson’s ratio lattice structures, Additive Manufacturing 68 (2023) 103525

2023
[105]

Letov, Y

N. Letov, Y . F. Zhao, Geometric modeling of advanced cellular struc- tures with skeletal graphs, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 270 (2024) 109087

2024
[106]

Letov, Y

N. Letov, Y . F. Zhao, A geometric modelling framework to support the design of heterogeneous lattice structures with non-linearly varying ge- ometry, Journal of Computational Design and Engineering 9 (5) (2022) 1565–1584

2022
[107]

Makatura, B

L. Makatura, B. Wang, Y .-L. Chen, B. Deng, C. Wojtan, B. Bickel, W. Matusik, Procedural metamaterials: A unified procedural graph for metamaterial design, ACM Transactions on Graphics 42 (5) (2023) 168

2023
[108]

L. M. Lai, M. M. F. Yuen, Blending of mesh objects to parametric sur- face, Computers & Graphics-UK 46 (SI) (2015) 283–293

2015
[109]

Y . Zhao, Q. Zou, G. Luo, J. Wu, S. Chen, D. Gao, M. Xuan, F. Wang, TPMS2STEP: error-controlled and C2 continuity-preserving translation of TPMS models to step files based on constrained-PIA, Computer- Aided Design (2024) 103726

2024
[110]

N. M. Patrikalakis, T. Maekawa, Shape interrogation for computer-aided design and manufacturing, V ol. 15, Springer, 2002

2002
[111]

Ullah, K

A. Ullah, K. Harada, A study on surface subdivision, in: 8th Interna- tional Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, V ol. 1-3, 2006, pp. U1409–U1412

2006
[112]

X. Kou, S. Tan, Heterogeneous object modeling: A review, Computer- Aided Design 39 (4) (2007) 284–301

2007
[113]

G. Elber, A review of a B-spline based volumetric representation: De- sign, analysis and fabrication of porous and /or heterogeneous geome- tries, Computer-Aided Design 163 (2023) 103587

2023
[114]

X. Wang, X. Qian, An optimization approach for constructing trivariate B-spline solids, Computer-Aided Design 46 (SI) (2014) 179–191

2014
[115]

H. Lin, S. Jin, Q. Hu, Z. Liu, Constructing B-spline solids from tetra- hedral meshes for isogeometric analysis, Computer Aided Geometric Design 35-36 (SI) (2015) 109–120

2015
[116]

Dokken, V

T. Dokken, V . Skytt, O. Barrowclough, Trivariate spline representations for computer aided design and additive manufacturing, Computers & Mathematics with Applications 78 (7, SI) (2019) 2168–2182

2019
[117]

Massarwi, G

F. Massarwi, G. Elber, A B-spline based framework for volumetric ob- ject modeling, Computer-Aided Design 78 (SI) (2016) 36–47

2016
[118]

D. Gao, J. Chen, Z. Dong, H. Lin, Connectivity-guaranteed porous synthesis in free form model by persistent homology, Computers & Graphics-UK 106 (2022) 33–44

2022
[119]

Q. Y . Hong, G. Elber, M.-S. Kim, Implicit functionally graded conform- ing microstructures, Computer-Aided Design 162 (2023) 103548

2023
[120]

C. Hu, H. Lin, Heterogeneous porous scaffold generation using trivariate B-spline solids and triply periodic minimal surfaces, Grapgical Models 115 (2021) 101105

2021
[121]

D. Gao, H. Lin, Z. Li, Free-form multi-level porous model design based on truncated hierarchical b-spline functions, Computer-Aided Design 162 (2023) 103549

2023
[122]

J. Liu, Y . Ma, A survey of manufacturing oriented topology optimization methods, Advanced in Engineering Software 100 (2016) 161–175

2016
[123]

M. Li, C. Lin, W. Chen, Y . Liu, S. Gao, Q. Zou, Xvoxel-based paramet- ric design optimization of feature models, Computer-Aided Design 160 (2023) 103528

2023
[124]

Y . Feng, T. Huang, Y . Gong, P. Jia, Sti ffness optimization design for TPMS architected cellular materials, Materials & Design 222 (2022) 111078

2022
[125]

Jiang, W

W. Jiang, W. Liao, T. Liu, X. Shi, C. Wang, J. Qi, Y . Chen, Z. Wang, C. Zhang, A voxel-based method of multiscale mechanical property op- timization for the design of graded TPMS structures, Materials & Design 204 (2021) 109655

2021
[126]

N. Aage, E. Andreassen, B. S. Lazarov, O. Sigmund, Giga-voxel compu- tational morphogenesis for structural design, Nature 550 (7674) (2017) 84+

2017
[127]

Brauer, D

C. Brauer, D. M. Aukes, Automated generation of multi-material struc- tures using the voxelfuse framework, in: ACM Symposium on Compu- tational Fabrication, ACM SIGGRAPH, 2020, pp. 1–8

2020
[128]

D. S. Nguyen, A method for generation of random lattice structure for additive manufacturing, in: 2019 IEEE International Conference on In- dustrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2019, pp. 1275– 1279

2019
[129]

Piros, L

A. Piros, L. Trautmann, Creating interior support structures with lightweight voronoi scaffold, International Journal of Interactive Design and Manufacturing 17 (1) (2023) 93–101

2023
[130]

Martinez, S

J. Martinez, S. Hornus, H. Song, S. Lefebvre, Polyhedral voronoi dia- grams for additive manufacturing, ACM Transactions on Graphics 37 (4) (2018) 129

2018
[131]

G. Wang, L. Shen, J. Zhao, H. Liang, D. Xie, Z. Tian, C. Wang, De- sign and compressive behavior of controllable irregular porous scaffolds: Based on voronoi-tessellation and for additive manufacturing, ACS Bio- materials Science & Engineering 4 (2, SI) (2018) 719–727

2018
[132]

Zhang, Z

D. Zhang, Z. Zhao, Y . Zhou, Y . Guo, A novel complex network-based modeling method for heterogeneous product design, Cluster Computing- the Journal of Networks Software Tools and Applications 22 (4) (2019) S7861–S7872

2019
[133]

L. Chao, Y . He, J. Gu, D. Xie, Y . Yang, L. Shen, G. Wu, L. Wang, Z. Tian, H. Liang, Design of porous structure based on the voronoi di- agram and stress line for better stress shielding relief and permeability, Journal of Materials Research and Technology 25 (2023) 1719–1734

2023
[134]

B. Liu, X. Wei, W. Cao, P. Lu, X. Wang, A novel method to design gra- dient porous structures with conformal density, Thin-Walled Structures 197 (2024) 111623

2024
[135]

B. Liu, S. Li, W. Cao, W. Lu, P. Lu, Design of 3D anisotropic voronoi porous structure driven by stress field, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 420 (2024) 116717

2024
[136]

Requicha, Representations for rigid solids - theory, methods, and sys- tems, Computing Surveys 12 (4) (1980) 436–464

A. Requicha, Representations for rigid solids - theory, methods, and sys- tems, Computing Surveys 12 (4) (1980) 436–464

1980
[137]

J. Peng, D. Kristjansson, D. Zorin, Interactive modeling of topologically complex geometric detail, ACM Transactions on Graphics 23 (3) (2004) 635–643

2004
[138]

Antolin, A

P. Antolin, A. Bu ffa, E. Cohen, J. F. Dannenho ffer, G. Elber, S. Elgeti, R. Haimes, R. Riesenfeld, Optimizing micro-tiles in micro-structures as a design paradigm, Computer-Aided Design 115 (2019) 23–33

2019
[139]

Groen, C

J. Groen, C. Thomsen, O. Sigmund, Multi-scale topology optimization for stiffness and de-homogenization using implicit geometry modeling, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 63 (2021) 2919–2934

2021
[140]

Q. Li, Q. Hong, Q. Qi, X. Ma, X. Han, J. Tian, Towards additive man- ufacturing oriented geometric modeling using implicit functions, Visual Computing for Industry Biomedicine and Art 1 (1) (2018) 9

2018
[141]

J. Feng, J. Fu, X. Yao, Y . He, Triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) porous structures: from multi-scale design, precise additive manufactur- ing to multidisciplinary applications, International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing 4 (2) (2022) 022001

2022
[142]

nTopology, https://www.ntop.com/, accessed: 2024-07-03

2024
[143]

iceSL, https://icesl.loria.fr/, accessed: 2024-09-06

2024
[144]

Pasko, V

A. Pasko, V . Adzhiev, A. Sourin, V . Savchenko, Function representation in geometric modeling - concepts, implementation and applications, Vi- sual Computer 11 (8) (1995) 429–446

1995
[145]

Popov, E

D. Popov, E. Maltsev, O. Fryazinov, A. Pasko, I. Akhatov, Efficient con- touring of functionally represented objects for additive manufacturing, 26 Computer-Aided Design 129 (2020) 102917

2020
[146]

L. Tian, L. Lu, W. Chen, Y . Y . Xia, C. C. L. Wang, W. Wang, Organic open-cell porous structure modeling, in: ACM Symposium on Compu- tational Fabrication, ACM SIGGRAPH, 2020, pp. 1–12

2020
[147]

Al-Ketan, D.-W

O. Al-Ketan, D.-W. Lee, R. Rowshan, R. K. Abu Al-Rub, Functionally graded and multi-morphology sheet TPMS lattices: Design, manufac- turing, and mechanical properties, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 102 (2020) 103520

2020
[148]

Kurzeja, J

K. Kurzeja, J. Rossignac, Rangefinder: Accelerating ball-interference queries against steady lattices, Computer-Aided Design 112 (2019) 14– 22

2019
[149]

Cirak, M

F. Cirak, M. Sabin, Adding quadric fillets to quador lattice structures, Computer-Aided Design 118 (2020) 102754

2020
[150]

Iandiorio, G

C. Iandiorio, G. Mattei, E. Marotta, G. Costanza, M. E. Tata, P. Salvini, The beneficial e ffect of a TPMS-based fillet shape on the mechanical strength of metal cubic lattice structures, Materials 17 (7) (2024) 1553

2024
[151]

J. Feng, J. Fu, C. Shang, Z. Lin, B. Li, Porous sca ffold design by solid T-splines and triply periodic minimal surfaces, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 336 (2018) 333–352

2018
[152]

Y . Li, Q. Xia, S. Kang, S. Kwak, J. Kim, A practical algorithm for the design of multiple-sized porous scaffolds with triply periodic structures, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 220 (2024) 481–495

2024
[153]

Wang, Y .-J

W. Wang, Y .-J. Liu, J. Wu, S. Tian, C. C. L. Wang, L. Liu, X. Liu, Support-free hollowing, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Com- puter Graphics 24 (10) (2018) 2787–2798

2018
[154]

L. Lu, A. Sharf, H. Zhao, Y . Wei, Q. Fan, X. Chen, Y . Savoye, C. Tu, D. Cohen-Or, B. Chen, Build-to-Last: Strength to weight 3D printed objects, ACM Transactions on Graphics 33 (4) (2014) 97

2014
[155]

G. I. Pasko, A. A. Pasko, T. L. Kunii, Bounded blending for function- based shape modeling, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 25 (2) (2005) 36–45

2005
[156]

J. R. Rossignac, A. A. Requicha, O ffsetting operations in solid mod- elling, Computer Aided Geometric Design 3 (2) (1986) 129–148

1986
[157]

Fryazinov, M

O. Fryazinov, M. Sanchez, A. Pasko, Shape conforming volumetric in- terpolation with interior distances, Computer & Graphics 46 (C) (2015) 149–155

2015
[158]

C. Lee, D. Jeong, S. Yoon, J. Kim, Porous three-dimensional sca ffold generation for 3D printing, Mathematics 8 (6) (2020) 946

2020
[159]

Huang, N

R. Huang, N. Dai, X. Cheng, Build orientation optimization for lightweight lattice parts production in selective laser melting by using a multicriteria genetic algorithm, Journal of Materials Research 35 (15, SI) (2020) 2046–2054

2020
[160]

De Biasi, S

R. De Biasi, S. Murchio, E. Sbettega, S. Carmignato, V . Luchin, M. Benedetti, E fficient optimization framework for L-PBF fatigue en- hanced Ti6Al4V lattice component, Materials & Design 230 (2023) 111975

2023
[161]

C. H. P. Nguyen, Y . Choi, Concurrent density distribution and build orientation optimization of additively manufactured functionally graded lattice structures, Computer-Aided Design 127 (2020) 102884

2020
[162]

Y . Li, K. Tang, D. He, X. Wang, Multi-axis support-free printing of freeform parts with lattice infill structures, Computer-Aided Design 133 (2021) 102986

2021
[163]

Youngquist, M

J. Youngquist, M. Sitharam, J. Peters, A slice-traversal algorithm for very large mapped volumetric models, Computer-Aided Design 141 (2021) 103102

2021
[164]

Maltsev, D

E. Maltsev, D. Popov, S. Chugunov, A. Pasko, I. Akhatov, An acceler- ated slicing algorithm for Frep models, Applied Sciences-Basel 11 (15) (2021) 6767

2021
[165]

J. Feng, J. Fu, Z. Lin, C. Shang, X. Niu, Layered infill area genera- tion from triply periodic minimal surfaces for additive manufacturing, Computer-Aided Design 107 (2019) 50–63

2019
[166]

S.-H. Oh, K. Park, Direct slicing of microcellular structures for digital light processing (DLP) additive manufacturing, Rapid Prototyping Jour- nal 30 (4) (2024) 633–642

2024
[167]

Z. Dong, J. Chen, H. Lin, Topology-controllable implicit surface recon- struction based on persistent homology, Computer-Aided Design 150 (2022) 103308

2022
[168]

J. Yan, H. Lin, Adaptive slicing of implicit porous structure with topol- ogy guarantee, Computer-Aided Design 162 (2023) 103557

2023
[169]

J. Hu, S. Wang, Y . Wang, F. Li, Z. Luo, A lightweight methodology of 3D printed objects utilizing multi-scale porous structures, Visual Com- puter 35 (6-8, SI) (2019) 949–959

2019
[170]

Aremu, I

A. Aremu, I. Maskery, C. Tuck, I. Ashcroft, R. Wildman, R. Hague, Effects of net and solid skins on self-supporting lattice structures, in: Challenges in Mechanics of Time Dependent Materials, V ol. 2, 2016, pp. 83–89

2016
[171]

H. Zhou, X. Cao, C. Li, X. Zhang, H. Fan, H. Lei, D. Fang, Design of self-supporting lattices for additive manufacturing, Journal of the Me- chanics and Physics of Solids 148 (2021) 104298

2021
[172]

Daynes, S

S. Daynes, S. Feih, Bio-inspired lattice structure optimisation with strain trajectory aligned trusses, Materials & Design 213 (2022) 110320

2022
[173]

Z. Wang, Y . Zhang, S. Tan, L. Ding, A. Bernard, Support point determi- nation for support structure design in additive manufacturing, Additive Manufacturing 47 (2021) 102341

2021
[174]

Huang, N

R. Huang, N. Dai, C. Pan, Y . Yang, X. Jiang, S. Tian, Z. Zhang, Grid-tree composite support structures for lattice parts in selective laser melting, Materials & Design 225 (2023) 111499

2023
[175]

J. Wu, C. C. L. Wang, X. Zhang, R. Westermann, Self-supporting rhom- bic infill structures for additive manufacturing, Computer-Aided Design 80 (2016) 32–42

2016
[176]

W. Wang, T. Y . Wang, Z. Yang, L. Liu, X. Tong, W. Tong, J. Deng, F. Chen, X. Liu, Cost-e ffective printing of 3D objects with skin-frame structures, ACM Transactions on Graphics 32 (6) (2013) 177

2013
[177]

W. Wang, S. Qian, L. Lin, B. Li, B. Yin, L. Liu, X. Liu, Support-free frame structures, Computers & Graphics-UK 66 (SI) (2017) 154–161

2017
[178]

Y . Liu, M. Zhou, C. Wei, Z. Lin, Topology optimization of self- supporting infill structures, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimiza- tion 63 (5) (2021) 2289–2304

2021
[179]

Y . Song, Z. Yang, Y . Liu, J. Deng, Function representation based slicer for 3D printing, Computer Aided Geometric Design 62 (2018) 276–293

2018
[180]

H. Tang, J. Zhang, C. Wang, Y . Long, Novel path planning algorithm for laser powder bed fusion to improve the scan quality of triply periodic minimal surface structures, Journal of Laser Applications 36 (2) (2024) 022025

2024
[181]

Huang, Y

R. Huang, Y . Wu, L. Huang, C. Pan, Y . Sun, S. Tian, D. Wang, Y . Yang, Scanning strategies for the 316l part with lattice structures fabricated by selective laser melting, International Journal of Advanced Manufactur- ing Technology
[182]

B. Liu, J. Feng, Z. Lin, S. Wu, Y . He, J. Fu, Spherical path planning for multi axis support free additive manufacturing of truss structures, Journal of Manufacturing Processes 109 (2024) 198–212

2024
[183]

Xiong, S.-I

Y . Xiong, S.-I. Park, S. Padmanathan, A. G. Dharmawan, S. Foong, D. W. Rosen, G. S. Soh, Process planning for adaptive contour paral- lel toolpath in additive manufacturing with variable bead width, Inter- national Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 105 (10, SI) (20...

2019
[184]

X. A. Nguyen, P. King, A. Vargas-Uscategui, H. Lohr, C. Chu, A con- tinuous toolpath strategy from offset contours for robotic additive man- ufacturing, Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 45 (12) (2023) 622

2023
[185]

H. Zhao, F. Gu, Q.-X. Huang, J. Garcia, Y . Chen, C. Tu, B. Benes, H. Zhang, D. Cohen-Or, B. Chen, Connected fermat spirals for layered fabrication, ACM Transactions on Graphics 35 (4) (2016) 100

2016
[186]

Y . Li, S. Yuan, W. Zhang, J. Zhu, A new continuous printing path plan- ning method for gradient honeycomb infill structures, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 126 (1-2) (2023) 719– 734

2023
[187]

Gupta, B

P. Gupta, B. Krishnamoorthy, G. Dreifus, Continuous toolpath plan- ning in a graphical framework for sparse infill additive manufacturing, Computer-Aided Design 127 (2020) 102880

2020
[188]

X. Zhai, F. Chen, Path planning of a type of porous structures for additive manufacturing, Computer-Aided Design 115 (2019) 218–230

2019
[189]

Bedel, Y

A. Bedel, Y . Coudert-Osmont, J. Martinez, R. I. Nishat, S. Whitesides, S. Lefebvre, Closed space-filling curves with controlled orientation for 3D printing, Computer Graphics Forum 41 (2) (2022) 473–492

2022
[190]

M. Bi, L. Xia, P. Tran, Z. Li, Q. Wan, L. Wang, W. Shen, G. Ma, Y . M. Xie, Continuous contour-zigzag hybrid toolpath for large format additive manufacturing, Additive Manufacturing 55 (2022) 102822

2022
[191]

L. Xia, G. Ma, F. Wang, G. Bai, Y . M. Xie, W. Xu, J. Xiao, Globally continuous hybrid path for extrusion-based additive manufacturing, Au- tomation in Construction 137 (2022) 104175

2022
[192]

Gomez, C

G. Gomez, C. Cortes, C. Creus, M. Z. Amilibia, A. Moreno, Generation 27 of continuous hybrid zig-zag and contour paths for 3D printing, Inter- national Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 119 (11-12) (2022) 7025–7040

2022
[193]

I. T. Ozbolat, A. K. M. B. Khoda, Design of a new parametric path plan for additive manufacturing of hollow porous structures with function- ally graded materials, Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 14 (4) (2014) 041005

2014
[194]

H. Gao, Z. Yang, W.-S. Lin, J. Tan, L. Chen, The e ffect of build ori- entation on the dimensional accuracy of 3D-printed mandibular com- plete dentures manufactured with a multijet 3D printer, journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry 30 (8) (202...

2021
[195]

H. Guo, J. Xu, S. Zhang, G. Yi, Build orientation optimization based on weighted analysis of local surface region curvature, Applied Sciences- Basel 11 (1) (2021) 304

2021
[196]

Somireddy, A

M. Somireddy, A. Czekanski, Anisotropic material behavior of 3D printed composite structures - material extrusion additive manufactur- ing, Materials & Design 195 (2020) 108953

2020
[197]

S. C. Das, R. Ranganathan, N. Murugan, E ffect of build orientation on the strength and cost of polyjet 3D printed parts, Rapid Prototyping Jour- nal 24 (5) (2018) 832–839

2018
[198]

A. C. G ¨unaydın, A. R. Yıldız, N. Kaya, Multi-objective optimization of build orientation considering support structure volume and build time in laser powder bed fusion, Materials Testing 64 (3) (2022) 323–338

2022
[199]

Rathee, M

S. Rathee, M. Srivastava, S. Maheshwari, A. N. Siddiquee, E ffect of varying spatial orientations on build time requirements for FDM pro- cess: A case study, Defence Technology 13 (2) (2017) 92–100

2017
[200]

H. Shen, X. Ye, G. Xu, L. Zhang, J. Qian, J. Fu, 3D printing build ori- entation optimization for flexible support platform, Rapid Prototyping Journal 26 (1) (2020) 59–72

2020
[201]

M. P. Zwier, W. W. Wits, Design for additive manufacturing: Automated build orientation selection and optimization, in: K. Alexopoulos (Ed.), 5th CIRP Global Web Conference - Research and Innovation for Future Production (CIRPE 2016), V ol. 55, 2016, pp. 128–133

2016
[202]

M. R. Rezaei, M. Houshmand, O. F. Valilai, An autonomous intelligent framework for optimal orientation detection in 3D printing, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 36 (6) (2023) 908–946

2023
[203]

P. Shi, Q. Qi, Y . Qin, F. Meng, S. Lou, P. J. Scott, X. Jiang, Learn to ro- tate: Part orientation for reducing support volume via generalizable rein- forcement learning, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 19 (12) (2023) 11687–11700

2023
[204]

Furlan, K

V . Furlan, K. Castelli, L. Scaburri, H. Giberti, Convolutional neural networks for part orientation in additive manufacturing, in: Cutting Edge Applications of Computational Intelligence Tools and Techniques, Springer, 2023, pp. 165–181

2023
[205]

Zhang, A

Y . Zhang, A. Bernard, R. Harik, K. P. Karunakaran, Build orientation optimization for multi-part production in additive manufacturing, Jour- nal of Intelligent Manufacturing 28 (6) (2017) 1393–1407

2017
[206]

Abdulhameed, S

O. Abdulhameed, S. H. Mian, K. Moiduddin, A. Al-Ahmari, N. Ahmed, M. K. Aboudaif, A multi-part orientation planning schema for fabrica- tion of non-related components using additive manufacturing, Microma- chines 13 (10) (2022) 1777

2022
[207]

H. Guo, J. Xu, S. Zhang, Y . Zhang, J. Tan, Multi-orientation optimiza- tion of complex parts based on model segmentation in additive manu- facturing, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 37 (1) (2023) 317–331

2023
[208]

Wu, Y .-J

C. Wu, Y .-J. Liu, C. C. L. Wang, Learning to accelerate decomposition for multi-directional 3D printing (2020). arXiv:2004.03450

2020 arXiv
[209]

Huang, J

Y . Huang, J. Zhang, X. Hu, G. Song, Z. Liu, L. Yu, L. Liu, Framefab: Robotic fabrication of frame shapes, ACM Transactions on Graphics 35 (6) (2016) 224

2016
[210]

C. Dai, C. C. L. Wang, C. Wu, S. Lefebvre, G. Fang, Y .-J. Liu, Support- free volume printing by multi-axis motion, ACM Transactions on Graph- ics 37 (4) (2018) 1–14

2018
[211]

Pelzer, C

L. Pelzer, C. Hopmann, Additive manufacturing of non-planar layers with variable layer height, Additive Manufacturing 37 (2021) 101697

2021
[212]

Y . Shan, D. Gan, H. Mao, Curved layer slicing based on isothermal sur- face, in: 49th SME North American Manufacturing Research Confer- ence, V ol. 53, 2021, pp. 484–491

2021
[213]

Y . Shan, Y . Shui, J. Hua, H. Mao, Additive manufacturing of non-planar layers using isothermal surface slicing, Journal of Manufacturing Pro- cesses 86 (2023) 326–335

2023
[214]

G. M. Fortunato, M. Nicoletta, E. Batoni, G. V ozzi, C. De Maria, A fully automatic non-planar slicing algorithm for the additive manufacturing of complex geometries, Additive Manufacturing 69 (2023) 103541

2023
[215]

Zhang, G

T. Zhang, G. Fang, Y . Huang, N. Dutta, S. Lefebvre, Z. M. Kilic, C. C. L. Wang, S3-Slicer: A general slicing framework for multi-axis 3D print- ing, ACM Transactions on Graphics 41 (6) (2022) 1–15

2022
[216]

Tyberg, J

J. Tyberg, J. H. Bohn, Local adaptive slicing, Rapid Prototyping Journal 4 (3) (1998) 118–127

1998
[217]

Dolenc, I

A. Dolenc, I. Makela, Slicing procedures for layered manufacturing techniques, Computer-Aided Design 26 (2) (1994) 119–126

1994
[218]

C. Perez, Analysis of the surface roughness and dimensional accuracy capability of fused deposition modelling processes, International Journal of Production Research 40 (12) (2002) 2865–2881

2002
[219]

Z. Zhao, L. Laperriere, Adaptive direct slicing of the solid model for rapid prototyping, International Journal of Production Research 38 (1) (2000) 69–83

2000
[220]

Kumar, A

C. Kumar, A. Choudhury, V olume deviation in direct slicing, Rapid Pro- totyping Journal 11 (3) (2005) 174–184

2005
[221]

Mao, T.-H

H. Mao, T.-H. Kwok, Y . Chen, C. C. L. Wang, Adaptive slicing based on efficient profile analysis, Computer-Aided Design 107 (2019) 89–101

2019
[222]

Q. Chen, J. Xu, S. Zhang, V olumetric adaptive slicing of manifold mesh for rapid prototyping based on relative volume error, Rapid Prototyping Journal 28 (3) (2022) 606–626

2022
[223]

Sasaki, M

Y . Sasaki, M. Takezawa, S. Kim, H. Kawaharada, T. Maekawa, Adap- tive direct slicing of volumetric attribute data represented by trivariate B-spline functions, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 91 (5-8) (2017) 1791–1807

2017
[224]

W. Ma, W. But, P. He, NURBS-based adaptive slicing for efficient rapid prototyping, Computer-Aided Design 36 (13) (2004) 1309–1325

2004
[225]

J. Feng, J. Fu, Z. Lin, C. Shang, B. Li, Direct slicing of T-spline surfaces for additive manufacturing, Rapid Prototyping Journal 24 (4) (2018) 709–721

2018
[226]

Zhang, S

Z. Zhang, S. Joshi, An improved slicing algorithm with e fficient contour construction using STL files, International Journal of Advanced Manu- facturing Technology 80 (5-8) (2015) 1347–1362

2015
[227]

Minetto, N

R. Minetto, N. V olpato, J. Stolfi, R. M. M. H. Gregori, M. V . G. da Silva, An optimal algorithm for 3D triangle mesh slicing, Computer-Aided De- sign 92 (2017) 1–10

2017
[228]

F. A. Adnan, F. R. M. Romlay, M. Shafiq, Real-time slicing algorithm for stereolithography (STL) CAD model applied in additive manufac- turing industry, in: International Conference on Innovative Technology, Engineering and Sciences, V ol. 342, 2018, p. 012016

2018
[229]

B. King, A. Rennie, G. Bennett, An e fficient triangle mesh slicing algo- rithm for all topologies in additive manufacturing, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 112 (3-4) (2021) 1023–1033

2021
[230]

Huang, C

P. Huang, C. C. L. Wang, Y . Chen, Intersection-free and topologically faithful slicing of implicit solid, Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 13 (2) (2013) 021009

2013
[231]

Y . Chen, C. C. L. Wang, Regulating complex geometries using layered depth-normal images for rapid prototyping and manufacturing, Rapid Prototyping Journal 19 (4) (2013) 253–268

2013
[232]

Rastegarzadeh, J

S. Rastegarzadeh, J. Huang, Standard tessellation language-free adaptive slicing scheme for additive manufacturing of cellular materials, Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 24 (6) (2024) 060902

2024
[233]

Q. Bo, Z. Lichao, S. Yusheng, L. Guocheng, Support fast generation algorithm based on discrete-marking in stereolithgraphy rapid prototyp- ing, Rapid Prototyping Journal 17 (6) (2011) 451–457

2011
[234]

Schmidt, N

R. Schmidt, N. Umetani, Branching support structures for 3D printing, in: ACM Siggraph 2014 Studio, Association for Computing Machinery, 2014, pp. 1–1

2014
[235]

Dumas, J

J. Dumas, J. Hergel, S. Lefebvre, Bridging the gap: Automated steady scaffoldings for 3D printing, ACM Transactions on Graphics 33 (4) (2014) 98

2014
[236]

Vanek, J

J. Vanek, J. A. G. Galicia, B. Benes, Clever support: E fficient support structure generation for digital fabrication, Computer Graphics Forum 33 (5) (2014) 117–125

2014
[237]

Zhang, L.-C

N. Zhang, L.-C. Zhang, Y . Chen, Y .-S. Shi, Local barycenter based ef- ficient tree-support generation for 3D printing, Computer-Aided Design 115 (2019) 277–292. 28

2019
[238]

L. Zhu, R. Feng, X. Li, J. Xi, X. Wei, Design of lightweight tree-shaped internal support structures for 3D printed shell models, Rapid Prototyp- ing Journal 25 (9, SI) (2019) 1552–1564

2019
[239]

L. Zhu, R. Feng, X. Li, J. Xi, X. Wei, A tree-shaped support structure for additive manufacturing generated by using a hybrid of particle swarm optimization and greedy algorithm, Journal of Computing and Informa- tion Science in Engineering 19 (4) (2019) 041010

2019
[240]

Vaissier, J.-P

B. Vaissier, J.-P. Pernot, L. Chougrani, P. V ´eron, Genetic-algorithm based framework for lattice support structure optimization in additive manufacturing, Computer-Aided Design 110 (2019) 11–23

2019
[241]

Zhang, Z

Y . Zhang, Z. Wang, Y . Zhang, S. Gomes, A. Bernard, Bio-inspired gen- erative design for support structure generation and optimization in ad- ditive manufacturing (AM), CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 69 (1) (2020) 117–120

2020
[242]

Hussein, L

A. Hussein, L. Hao, C. Yan, R. Everson, P. Young, Advanced lattice support structures for metal additive manufacturing, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 213 (7) (2013) 1019–1026

2013
[243]

Cloots, A

M. Cloots, A. Spierings, K. Wegener, Assessing new support minimizing strategies for the additive manufacturing technology SLM, in: Interna- tional Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 2013, pp. 631–643

2013
[244]

Strano, L

G. Strano, L. Hao, R. M. Everson, K. E. Evans, A new approach to the design and optimisation of support structures in additive manufacturing, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 66 (9-12) (2013) 1247–1254

2013
[245]

M. X. Gan, C. H. Wong, Practical support structures for selective laser melting, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 238 (2016) 474– 484

2016
[246]

Vaidya, S

R. Vaidya, S. Anand, Optimum support structure generation for additive manufacturing using unit cell structures and support removal constraint, Procedia Manufacturing 5 (2016) 1043–1059

2016
[247]

L. Luo, I. Baran, S. Rusinkiewicz, W. Matusik, Chopper: Partitioning models into 3D-printable parts, ACM Transactions on Graphics 31 (6) (2012) 129

2012
[248]

Wei, Y .-H

X.-R. Wei, Y .-H. Zhang, G.-H. Geng, No-infill 3D printing, 3D Research 7 (2016) 1–12

2016
[249]

Mezzadri, V

F. Mezzadri, V . Bouriakov, X. Qian, Topology optimization of self- supporting support structures for additive manufacturing, Additive Man- ufacturing 21 (2018) 666–682

2018
[250]

Leary, L

M. Leary, L. Merli, F. Torti, M. Mazur, M. Brandt, Optimal topology for additive manufacture: A method for enabling additive manufacture of support-free optimal structures, Materials & Design 63 (2014) 678–690

2014
[251]

van de Ven, R

E. van de Ven, R. Maas, C. Ayas, M. Langelaar, F. van Keulen, Over- hang control based on front propagation in 3D topology optimization for additive manufacturing, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 369 (2020) 113169

2020
[252]

Garaigordobil, R

A. Garaigordobil, R. Ansola, J. Santamaria, I. Fernandez de Bustos, A new overhang constraint for topology optimization of self-supporting structures in additive manufacturing, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 58 (5) (2018) 2003–2017

2018
[253]

Langelaar, An additive manufacturing filter for topology optimiza- tion of print-ready designs, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimiza- tion 55 (3) (2017) 871–883

M. Langelaar, An additive manufacturing filter for topology optimiza- tion of print-ready designs, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimiza- tion 55 (3) (2017) 871–883

2017
[254]

Langelaar, Topology optimization of 3D self-supporting structures for additive manufacturing, Additive Manufacturing 12 (A) (2016) 60– 70

M. Langelaar, Topology optimization of 3D self-supporting structures for additive manufacturing, Additive Manufacturing 12 (A) (2016) 60– 70

2016
[255]

Q. Zou, J. Zhao, Iso-parametric tool-path planning for point clouds, Computer-Aided Design 45 (11) (2013) 1459–1468

2013
[256]

Zou, Length-optimal tool path planning for freeform surfaces with preferred feed directions based on poisson formulation, Computer- Aided Design 139 (2021) 103072

Q. Zou, Length-optimal tool path planning for freeform surfaces with preferred feed directions based on poisson formulation, Computer- Aided Design 139 (2021) 103072

2021
[257]

S. Park, B. Choi, Tool-path planning for direction-parallel area milling, Computer-Aided Design 32 (1) (2000) 17–25

2000
[258]

Rajan, V

V . Rajan, V . Srinivasan, K. Tarabanis, The optimal zigzag direction for filling a two-dimensional region, Rapid Prototyping Journal 7 (5) (2001) 231–240

2001
[259]

Y .-a. Jin, Y . He, G.-h. Xue, J.-z. Fu, A parallel-based path generation method for fused deposition modeling, International Journal of Ad- vanced Manufacturing Technology 77 (5-8) (2015) 927–937

2015
[260]

Q. Zou, J. Zhang, B. Deng, J. Zhao, Iso-level tool path planning for free-form surfaces, Computer-Aided Design 53 (2014) 117–125

2014
[261]

Zou, Robust and e fficient tool path generation for machining low- quality triangular mesh surfaces, International Journal of Production Re- search 59 (24) (2021) 7457–7467

Q. Zou, Robust and e fficient tool path generation for machining low- quality triangular mesh surfaces, International Journal of Production Re- search 59 (24) (2021) 7457–7467

2021
[262]

Y . Yang, H. Loh, J. Fuh, Y . Wang, Equidistant path generation for im- proving scanning efficiency in layered manufacturing, Rapid Prototyp- ing Journal 8 (1) (2002) 30–37

2002
[263]

M. Held, C. Spielberger, A smooth spiral tool path for high speed ma- chining of 2D pockets, Computer-Aided Design 41 (7) (2009) 539–550

2009
[264]

S. H. Nair, A. Sinha, L. Vachhani, Hilbert’s space-filling curve for re- gions with holes, in: 2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 2017, pp. 313–319

2017
[265]

Yamamoto, J

K. Yamamoto, J. V . S. Luces, K. Shirasu, Y . Hoshikawa, T. Okabe, Y . Hi- rata, A novel single-stroke path planning algorithm for 3D printers using continuous carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastics, Additive Manufac- turing 55 (2022) 102816

2022
[266]

D. Wang, H. Wang, Y . Wang, Continuity path planning for 3D printed lightweight infill structures, in: 2021 IEEE Conference on Telecommu- nications, Optics and Computer Science (TOCS), 2021, pp. 959–962

2021
[267]

G. Jin, W. Li, C. Tsai, L. Wang, Adaptive tool-path generation of rapid prototyping for complex product models, Journal of Manufacturing Sys- tems 30 (3) (2011) 154–164

2011
[268]

G. Jin, W. Li, L. Gao, K. Popplewell, A hybrid and adaptive tool- path generation approach of rapid prototyping and manufacturing for biomedical models, Computers in Industry 64 (3) (2013) 336–349

2013
[269]

Kurzeja, J

K. Kurzeja, J. Rossignac, CTSP: CSG combinations of tran-similar two- patterns of CSG cells, Computer-Aided Design 146 (2022) 103212

2022
[270]

Rossignac, Corner-operated tran-similar (COTS) maps, patterns, and lattices, ACM Transactions on Graphics 39 (1) (2020) 5

J. Rossignac, Corner-operated tran-similar (COTS) maps, patterns, and lattices, ACM Transactions on Graphics 39 (1) (2020) 5

2020
[271]

Zou, H.-Y

Q. Zou, H.-Y . Feng, Push-pull direct modeling of solid cad models, Ad- vances in Engineering Software 127 (2019) 59–69

2019
[272]

Zou, H.-Y

Q. Zou, H.-Y . Feng, A robust direct modeling method for quadric B-rep models based on geometry–topology inconsistency tracking, Engineer- ing with Computers 38 (4) (2022) 3815–3830

2022
[273]

L. Wang, M. Jahre, A. Adileho, L. Eeckhout, MDM: The GPU memory divergence model, in: 53rd Annual IEEE /ACM International Sympo- sium on Microarchitecture (MICRO), 2020, pp. 1009–1021. 29

2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Singh, H

N. Singh, H. Siddiqui, B. S. R. Koyalada, A. Mandal, V . Chauhan, S. Natarajan, S. Kumar, M. Goswami, S. Kumar, Recent advancements in additive manufacturing (AM) techniques: A forward-looking review, Metals and Materials International 29 (8) (2023) 2119–2136

2023

[2] [2]

S. M. H. Hashemi, U. Babic, P. Hadikhani, D. Psaltis, The potentials of additive manufacturing for mass production of electrochemical energy systems, Current Opinion in Electrochemistry 20 (SI) (2020) 54–59

2020

[3] [3]

M. K. Thompson, G. Moroni, T. Vaneker, G. Fadel, R. I. Campbell, I. Gibson, A. Bernard, J. Schulz, P. Graf, B. Ahuja, F. Martina, De- sign for additive manufacturing: Trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints, CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 65 (2) (2016) 737–760

2016

[4] [4]

Al Rashid, S

A. Al Rashid, S. A. Khan, S. G. Al-Ghamdi, M. Koc, Additive manu- facturing: Technology, applications, markets, and opportunities for the built environment, Automation in Construction 118 (2020) 103268

2020

[5] [5]

Z. Qin, G. S. Jung, M. J. Kang, M. J. Buehler, The mechanics and de- sign of a lightweight three-dimensional graphene assembly, Science Ad- vances 3 (1) (2017) e1601536

2017

[6] [6]

S. O. Obadimu, K. Kourousis, I, Compressive behaviour of additively manufactured lattice structures: A review, Aerospace 8 (8) (2021) 207

2021

[7] [7]

G. Dong, Y . Tang, Y . F. Zhao, A survey of modeling of lattice struc- tures fabricated by additive manufacturing, Journal of Mechanical De- sign 139 (10) (2017) 100906. 23

2017

[8] [8]

du Plessis, N

A. du Plessis, N. Razavi, M. Benedetti, S. Murchio, M. Leary, M. Wat- son, D. Bhate, F. Berto, Properties and applications of additively man- ufactured metallic cellular materials: A review, Progress in Materials Science 125 (2022) 100918

2022