Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Curvaton distribution from stochastic inflation

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper derives closed-form probability distributions for the curvature perturbation produced by a curvaton in stochastic inflation and shows that, in a broad region of the decay-rate–mass plane, a single curvaton can account for the…

desk verdict Genuinely new closed-form curvaton distributions from stochastic inflation, but the trigonometric cases lean on the quadratic zeta–phi conversion the paper itself flags as approximate, so the high-probability maps are provisional. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15849 v1 pith:H5VYFLMX submitted 2024-11-24 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

Koki Tokeshi This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords curvatonstochasticinflationcurvatureperturbationdistributionexactstationarysolutionsFokker-PlanckequationStarobinsky-Yokoyamaequilibriumparameterspaceprimordialperturbations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that the exact stationary probability distributions of a spectator scalar field in stochastic inflation can be turned, by a change of variables, into closed-form distributions for the curvature perturbation produced by a curvaton. It derives $P(\zeta)$ for four exactly solvable potentials and uses the resulting expressions to map the $(\Gamma, m)$ parameter space, asking where a curvaton has high probability of contributing between 10% and 100% of the observed $\zeta_{\rm obs} = 10^{-5}$. The central finding is that such high-probability regions exist, including a branch where the curvaton dominates the universe before decay and a branch where it does not. A sympathetic reader would care because the paper turns a model-dependent early-universe question into an analytically tractable probability statement.

What carries the argument

The master formula is Eq. (3.9), obtained from $P(\zeta) = \sum_{\lambda=\pm} f_\infty(\phi_\lambda)\,|\mathrm{d}\phi_\lambda/\mathrm{d}\zeta|$ using the inverted relation $\phi_\pm = (H/6\pi\zeta_{\rm M})\sqrt{(1\pm Y)/(1\mp Y)}$, where $Y = \sqrt{1-(\zeta/\zeta_{\rm M})^2}$ and $\zeta_{\rm M}^2 = (H/M_{\rm P})^2/[(12\pi)^2\sqrt{\Gamma/m}]$. The Jacobian has a square-root singularity at $\zeta = \zeta_{\rm M}$, and the two branches correspond to curvaton domination ($r_{\rm decay}\simeq 1$) and subdominance. The input distributions $f_\infty(\phi)$ are the late-time equilibria of the Fokker–Planck equation, the Starobinsky–Yokoyama formula, and the model dependence enters through the mass parameter $\alpha$ and the shape parameters $\ell$, $s$, and $t$.

What would settle it

Run a lattice or $\delta N$ simulation of a spectator field in the trigonometric Scarf potential $v(y) = -s \ln\cos y$ with the same $(\Gamma,m)$ values, converting to $\zeta$ through the actual energy-density transfer rather than Eq. (3.3), and check whether $P(0.1\,\zeta_{\rm obs} < \zeta < \zeta_{\rm obs}) > 0.8$ in the claimed strips; if not, the central parameter-space claim fails for the non-quadratic cases.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that, for each of the four stationary spectator distributions — harmonic oscillator, radial harmonic oscillator, trigonometric Scarf, and trigonometric Rosen–Morse — substituting the inverted field–curvature relation (3.4) into probability conservation yields a closed-form $P(\zeta)$: Eqs. (3.12), (3.15), (3.17), and (3.24). It further claims that in the $(\Gamma,m)$ plane, with $H/M_{\rm P} = 10^{-5}$ and $\zeta_{\rm obs} = 10^{-5}$, there are parameter regions where $P(0.1\,\zeta_{\rm obs} < \zeta < \zeta_{\rm obs})$ exceeds 80%, meaning the curvaton alone can account for the observed curvature perturbation with high probability. For the three non-quadratic potentials the conversion relation (3.3), exact only for a quadratic potential, is used as a stated first approximation.

Load-bearing premise

The conversion formula (3.3), exact only for a purely quadratic potential with sudden decay, is applied to the three non-quadratic potentials; if the neglected corrections are sizable, the derived $P(\zeta)$ and probability maps for those cases are not the physical distributions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, a curvaton with $m/M_{\rm P}\sim 10^{-10}$ at $H/M_{\rm P}=10^{-5}$ can generate the full observed curvature perturbation with probability above 80% on the curvaton-dominated branch, essentially independent of the decay rate.
  • The probability maps give a quantitative naturalness criterion: parameter sets in the low-probability regions are disfavored because, with high probability, they produce less than 10% of $\zeta_{\rm obs}$ or exceed it.
  • For the radial harmonic oscillator, $\ell>0$ broadens the high-probability region, while for the trigonometric Scarf potential increasing $s$ narrows it, with $s\to\infty$ recovering the quadratic-potential result.
  • For the trigonometric potentials the finite field range splits the parameter space into six regions; parameters in region F necessarily overproduce the total curvature perturbation and are excluded.
  • Because the stationary state is assumed, the results apply only when inflation lasts much longer than the relaxation time of the curvaton; otherwise initial conditions would matter.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Applying the same change-of-variables step to the time-dependent transition probabilities would reveal how the >80% regions depend on the initial curvaton value; the paper explicitly leaves this for future work.
  • The Jacobian singularity at $\zeta=\zeta_{\rm M}$ concentrates probability near the maximum allowed curvature perturbation; if that tail feeds primordial-black-hole formation thresholds, the stochastic distributions could also predict an enhanced PBH abundance even when the mean $\zeta$ is small.
  • The exact distributions could be used to derive the full probability density of $f_{\rm NL}$ or of the curvaton's energy fraction, rather than just the integrated probability interval, giving sharper observational tests.
  • A numerical computation of $\zeta$ from the exact nonlinear field equations for the cosine/logarithmic potentials would show whether the 80% contours persist; until then the trigonometric-case maps should be read as illustrative of the method.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper applies four exactly solvable stationary solutions of stochastic inflation (harmonic oscillator, radial harmonic oscillator, trigonometric Scarf, and trigonometric Rosen–Morse) to the curvaton scenario. It uses the standard quadratic-curvaton relation ζ(φ), Eq. (3.3), to change variables and obtain closed-form distributions P(ζ) for each case (Eqs. 3.12, 3.15, 3.17, and 3.24), imposes normalization on each distribution, and computes the probability P(cζ_obs < ζ < ζ_obs) with c = 0.1 in the (Γ, m) parameter space. The paper finds regions where the probability of a non-negligible curvaton contribution exceeds 80%. For the trigonometric potentials, a finite-field-domain condition x < 1 is introduced, leading to a six-region parameter-space classification (Fig. 5 and Table 2).

Significance. If the results hold, the paper provides a useful analytical demonstration of how exact non-Gaussian spectator distributions can be propagated into curvature-perturbation statistics, extending the earlier quadratic-potential analysis of Refs. [64,65]. Strengths include the explicit closed-form expressions, the consistently enforced normalizations, the transparent order-of-magnitude checks, and the detailed appendix on the trigonometric-Scarf moments. The main limitation is that the central novelty for the three non-quadratic potentials rests on an approximation that the manuscript itself flags, so the quantitative parameter-space statements for those cases need additional support or qualification.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.1, Eq. (3.3)] The conversion relation ζ(φ) in Eq. (3.3) is acknowledged by the authors to be exact only for a purely quadratic potential, yet it is used to derive the distributions (3.15), (3.17), and (3.24) for the radial harmonic oscillator and the two trigonometric potentials. The issue is quantitative, not merely formal: for the Scarf potential with s = 0.5, the potential about the minimum is V(φ) = (1/2)m²φ² + (2π²/3)(m/H)²φ⁴ + O(φ⁶), and the typical displacement from Eq. (3.23) gives ⟨φ²⟩^{1/2}/H ~ 0.24 for the field values dominating the distribution. The quartic term is therefore an O(1) correction to the quadratic term in this regime, so the derived P(ζ) and the >80% probability regions in Figs. 4–6 cannot be considered the physical distributions for the non-quadratic cases without further justification. I request either that the main claims be restricted to the quadratic harmonic case, or that the paper provide a quantitative estimate or validation of the correction terms over the plotted parameter region.
  2. [§3.3.1 and Fig. 3] The parameter-space maps assume the curvaton has reached the stationary distribution. For the harmonic potential, Eq. (2.13b) implies a relaxation timescale of order 3H²/m² e-folds. The first high-probability branch in Fig. 3, and the corresponding peak in Fig. 2, is located at m/H ~ 10⁻⁵, which requires roughly 10¹⁰ e-folds to relax. That is orders of magnitude larger than the 'much longer than N★ = 60' stated below Eq. (2.14). Since Ref. [64] shows that finite-duration effects can be important in stochastic spectator dynamics, the paper should either state the required total inflation duration for the plotted regions or demonstrate that the >80% probability claim is robust under finite-duration initial conditions.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.2] The distribution P(ζ) is defined and normalized on the positive interval [0, ζM], while the original stationary φ-distribution is supported on the full real line (for the harmonic cases) and is symmetric. The quantity plotted is therefore effectively the distribution of |ζ|. This should be stated explicitly in the probability interpretation.
  2. [§3.3.2, Eq. (3.19)] The statement after Fig. 3 that 'implementing a different scale merely shifts the high-probability regions' is not exact for the trigonometric cases, because the allowed-region condition x < 1 in Eq. (3.19) depends on H through α/ζM.
  3. [Appendix B, Eq. (B.2)] Eq. (B.2) is introduced as a conjecture, but it is used to derive the variance formula (3.23) and the fourth-moment formula (B.15), which are quoted as analytical results in the main text. Please provide a proof or clearly mark these moments as numerically verified rather than exact.
  4. [§3.3.1 and §3.3.2] Minor editorial issues: in §3.3.1, 'excess the observational amplitude' should be 'exceed'; in the same section the abbreviation 'r_dec' is used inconsistently with 'r_decay' elsewhere; and the color/grayscale conventions in Figs. 3, 4, and 6 are described only in the text, not in the captions.
  5. [§3.3.2, Fig. 5] The analysis of the trigonometric potentials is restricted to the symmetric t = 0 limit, and the asymmetric cases of Eqs. (3.16) and (3.24) are not explored. The conclusions should be phrased as applying to the symmetric slice, not to the full trigonometric Scarf or Rosen–Morse parameter space.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the curvaton P(ζ) is obtained by a direct change of variables from stationary spectator distributions that are independently stated, and the model parameters are fixed inputs rather than fit to the target probability.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the sense required by the circularity test. Section 3.2 constructs P(ζ) from the stationary spectator distributions f∞(φ) by conservation of probability under the inversion (3.4), P(ζ)=Σ f∞(φλ)|dφ/dζ| (Eq. 3.6). The four f∞(φ) are quoted explicitly in Eqs. (2.14), (2.18a), (2.19a), and (2.20), and although they originate from the companion paper [60], that paper is a parameter-free construction of exact Fokker-Planck solutions with stated assumptions (discrete spectrum, stationary limit) and does not contain the curvaton conversion or the observed-amplitude thresholds; it is therefore independent support rather than a circular input. The model parameters m, Γ, H/MP, c=0.1, and ζobs=10^-5 are fixed inputs; none is fitted to make P(cζobs<ζ<ζobs) large. The '>80% probability' regions are computed cumulative probabilities of the derived distribution, not parameters determined by the target claim. The paper's own caveat that Eq. (3.3)/(3.4) 'ceases to be an exact relation' for non-quadratic potentials and that corrections 'can be relevant' is an accuracy/validity limitation, not a circularity: the relation is applied as a stated approximation rather than defined in terms of the output. Accordingly, no circular step is identified and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced; the curvaton and the stochastic-inflation formalism are established. The new content is analytical distributions and parameter-space maps, so the ledger records the chosen fiducial values and the imported physical and mathematical assumptions.

free parameters (4)
  • c (non-negligible threshold) = 0.1
    The probability P(c zeta_obs < zeta < zeta_obs) defines "non-negligible contribution"; c is chosen by hand and all parameter-space regions and probabilities depend on it.
  • H/M_P (inflationary Hubble scale) = 10^-5
    The Hubble scale during inflation is fixed to 10^-5 M_P in Figures 3, 4, 6 and in the order-of-magnitude estimates; the paper notes that different scales merely shift the high-probability regions.
  • zeta_obs (observed curvature amplitude) = 10^-5
    The observed amplitude is fixed to 10^-5 for concreteness, and the region definitions and probabilities are computed relative to it.
  • s and l (potential shape parameters) = s = 0.5, 2.5; l = -0.5, 2.5 in illustrative plots
    These are free model parameters controlling the curvature of the spectator potential; the width of the high-probability regions depends on them, and the paper does not derive them from a particle physics model.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The four exactly solvable stationary spectator distributions from Ref. [60] (Table 1) are correct and complete for the four potentials considered.
    Section 2.2 imports these distributions verbatim; no proof is repeated here, and the paper's results inherit their validity.
  • ad hoc to paper The quadratic-curvaton conversion relation zeta(phi), Eq. (3.3), applies to all four potentials, including non-quadratic ones.
    The paper states in Sec. 3.1 that the relation is exact only for a quadratic potential and that corrections can be relevant for the non-quadratic cases; the parameter-space results for Scarf and Rosen-Morse potentials rely on this approximation.
  • domain assumption The curvaton field has reached its stationary (equilibrium) distribution before horizon exit; total inflation duration is much longer than N_* ~ 60.
    Stated below Eq. (2.14) and in Sec. 3.2; the analysis ignores initial-condition dependence.
  • domain assumption The Fokker-Planck spectrum contains only discrete eigenstates; the stationary state is the normalized ground state.
    Assumed in Eq. (2.6) and the discussion around it, following Ref. [60]; this prevents continuous-spectrum contributions.
  • domain assumption Sudden decay of the curvaton with a constant decay rate Gamma; radiation domination before decay.
    Stated in Sec. 3.1; this is the standard simplified curvaton decay model.
  • ad hoc to paper For the trigonometric potentials, the parameter-space analysis is restricted to the symmetric t = 0 limit.
    Sec. 3.3.2 sets t = 0 for the Scarf case and gives only the distribution, not the parameter-space map, for Rosen-Morse; the six-region structure is derived for t = 0.
  • ad hoc to paper Appendix B's indefinite integral formula (B.2) is correct, although it is introduced as a conjecture.
    The closed-form variance in Eq. (3.23) rests on this unproved formula and on Gauss/Dixon summation; no proof is supplied.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Curvaton distribution from stochastic inflation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/H5VYFLMX

@misc{pith2026241115849,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Curvaton distribution from stochastic inflation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/H5VYFLMX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15849}
}
read the original abstract

The curvaton paradigm can realise a part of or all the observed curvature perturbation. Based on the stochastic formalism of inflation and closed-form exact distributions therein, the distribution of the curvature perturbation is presented in an analytical manner by identifying a test field with a curvaton. The parameter space consisting of the decay rate and the mass of the curvaton is studied to discuss the probability that the curvaton can contribute to the curvature perturbation in a non-negligible way.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Superhorizon curvature perturbations in hybrid inflation revisited

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Hybrid inflation's waterfall tachyonic instability grows isocurvature modes that convert to curvature perturbations at the field-space turn, yielding a k^{3}-peaked spectrum with always-positive f_NL that enhances PBH...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [64]

    Enqvist, R.N

    K. Enqvist, R.N. Lerner, O. Taanila and A. Tranberg,Spectator field dynamics in de Sitter and curvaton initial conditions, JCAP10 (2012) 052 [1205.5446]

    arXiv 2012

  2. [1]

    Starobinsky,A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,Phys

    A.A. Starobinsky,A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,Phys. Lett. B91 (1980) 99

    1980

  3. [2]

    Sato,First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe, Mon

    K. Sato,First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 195(1981) 467

    1981

  4. [3]

    Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys

    A.H. Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D 23(1981) 347

    1981

  5. [4]

    Linde,A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,Phys

    A.D. Linde,A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,Phys. Lett. B108 (1982) 389

    1982

  6. [5]

    Linde,Chaotic Inflation,Phys

    A.D. Linde,Chaotic Inflation,Phys. Lett. B129 (1983) 177

    1983

  7. [6]

    Albrecht and P.J

    A. Albrecht and P.J. Steinhardt,Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. Lett.48 (1982) 1220

    1982

  8. [7]

    Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

    arXiv 2020

Show all 105 references
  1. [8]

    Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,Astron. Astrophys.641 (2020) A10 [1807.06211]

    2020 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A9 [1905.05697]

    2020 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Baumann and L

    D. Baumann and L. McAllister,Inflation and String Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (2015)

    2015

  4. [11]

    Lyth and D

    D.H. Lyth and D. Wands,Generating the curvature perturbation without an inflaton,Phys. Lett. B524 (2002) 5 [hep-ph/0110002]

    2002 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Moroi and T

    T. Moroi and T. Takahashi,Effects of cosmological moduli fields on cosmic microwave background,Phys. Lett. B 522(2001) 215 [hep-ph/0110096]

    2001 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Enqvist and M.S

    K. Enqvist and M.S. Sloth,Adiabatic CMB perturbations in pre-big bang string cosmology, Nucl. Phys. B626 (2002) 395 [hep-ph/0109214]

    2002 arXiv

  7. [14]

    D.H. Lyth, C. Ungarelli and D. Wands,The Primordial density perturbation in the curvaton scenario, Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 023503 [astro-ph/0208055]

    2003 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Bartolo, S

    N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto,Non-Gaussianity in the curvaton scenario,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 043503 [hep-ph/0309033]

    2004 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Lyth and Y

    D.H. Lyth and Y. Rodriguez,The Inflationary prediction for primordial non-Gaussianity,Phys. Rev. Lett.95 (2005) 121302 [astro-ph/0504045]

    2005 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Lyth and Y

    D.H. Lyth and Y. Rodríguez,Non-Gaussianity from the second-order cosmological perturbation,Phys. Rev. D 71(2005) 123508 [astro-ph/0502578]

    2005 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Enqvist and S

    K. Enqvist and S. Nurmi,Non-Gaussianity in curvaton models with nearly quadratic potential,JCAP 10 (2005) 013 [astro-ph/0508573]

    2005 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Malik and D.H

    K.A. Malik and D.H. Lyth,A numerical study of non-Gaussianity in the curvaton scenario,JCAP 09(2006) 008 [astro-ph/0604387]. – 29 –

    2006 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Sasaki, J

    M. Sasaki, J. Valiviita and D. Wands,Non-Gaussianity of the primordial perturbation in the curvaton model, Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 103003 [astro-ph/0607627]

    2006 arXiv

  14. [21]

    M.Beltran, Isocurvature,non-Gaussianityandthecurvatonmodel ,Phys.Rev.D 78(2008)023530[0804.1097]

    2008 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Moroi and T

    T. Moroi and T. Takahashi,Non-Gaussianity and Baryonic Isocurvature Fluctuations in the Curvaton Scenario,Phys. Lett. B671(2009) 339 [0810.0189]

    2009 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Ichikawa, T

    K. Ichikawa, T. Suyama, T. Takahashi and M. Yamaguchi,Primordial curvature fluctuation and its non-Gaussianity in models with modulated reheating,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 063545

    2008

  17. [24]

    M. Li, C. Lin, T. Wang and Y. Wang,Non-Gaussianity, Isocurvature Perturbation, Gravitational Waves and a No-Go Theorem for Isocurvaton,Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 063526 [0805.1299]

    2009 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Huang,Large Non-Gaussianity Implication for Curvaton Scenario, Phys

    Q.-G. Huang,Large Non-Gaussianity Implication for Curvaton Scenario, Phys. Lett. B669(2008) 260 [0801.0467]

    2008 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Huang,Curvaton with Polynomial Potential,JCAP 11(2008) 005 [0808.1793]

    Q.-G. Huang,Curvaton with Polynomial Potential,JCAP 11(2008) 005 [0808.1793]

    2008 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Huang and Y

    Q.-G. Huang and Y. Wang,Curvaton Dynamics and the Non-Linearity Parameters in Curvaton Model,JCAP 09(2008) 025 [0808.1168]

    2008 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Huang,Spectral Index in Curvaton Scenario,Phys

    Q.-G. Huang,Spectral Index in Curvaton Scenario,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 043515 [0807.0050]

    2008 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Enqvist and T

    K. Enqvist and T. Takahashi,Signatures of Non-Gaussianity in the Curvaton Model,JCAP 09(2008) 012 [0807.3069]

    2008 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Kawasaki, K

    M. Kawasaki, K. Nakayama, T. Sekiguchi, T. Suyama and F. Takahashi,A General Analysis of Non-Gaussianity from Isocurvature Perturbations, JCAP01(2009) 042 [0810.0208]

    2009 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Chingangbam and Q.-G

    P. Chingangbam and Q.-G. Huang,The Curvature Perturbation in the Axion-type Curvaton Model, JCAP04 (2009) 031 [0902.2619]

    2009 arXiv

  25. [32]

    A.Chambers,S.NurmiandA.Rajantie, Non-Gaussianityfromresonantcurvatondecay ,JCAP01(2010)012 [0909.4535]

    2010 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Enqvist, S

    K. Enqvist, S. Nurmi, G. Rigopoulos, O. Taanila and T. Takahashi,The Subdominant Curvaton, JCAP11 (2009) 003 [0906.3126]

    2009 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Byrnes, K

    C.T. Byrnes, K. Enqvist and T. Takahashi,Scale-dependence of Non-Gaussianity in the Curvaton Model, JCAP09(2010) 026 [1007.5148]

    2010 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Enqvist, A

    K. Enqvist, A. Mazumdar and O. Taanila,The TeV-mass curvaton,JCAP 09(2010) 030 [1007.0657]

    2010 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Byrnes, K

    C.T. Byrnes, K. Enqvist, S. Nurmi and T. Takahashi,Strongly scale-dependent polyspectra from curvaton self-interactions,JCAP 11(2011) 011 [1108.2708]

    2011 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Kawasaki, T

    M. Kawasaki, T. Kobayashi and F. Takahashi,Non-Gaussianity from Curvatons Revisited,Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 123506 [1107.6011]

    2011 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Zel’dovich and I.D

    Y.B. Zel’dovich and I.D. Novikov,The Hypothesis of Cores Retarded during Expansion and the Hot Cosmological Model,Sov. Astron.10 (1967) 602

    1967

  32. [40]

    Hawking,Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass,Mon

    S. Hawking,Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.152(1971) 75

    1971

  33. [41]

    Carr and S.W

    B.J. Carr and S.W. Hawking,Black holes in the early Universe,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.168(1974) 399. – 30 –

    1974

  34. [42]

    Carr,The Primordial black hole mass spectrum,Astrophys

    B.J. Carr,The Primordial black hole mass spectrum,Astrophys. J.201(1975) 1

    1975

  35. [43]

    Kohri, C.-M

    K. Kohri, C.-M. Lin and T. Matsuda,Primordial black holes from the inflating curvaton,Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 103527 [1211.2371]

    2013 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Kawasaki, N

    M. Kawasaki, N. Kitajima and S. Yokoyama,Gravitational waves from a curvaton model with blue spectrum, JCAP08(2013) 042 [1305.4464]

    2013 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Bugaev and P.A

    E.V. Bugaev and P.A. Klimai,Primordial black hole constraints for curvaton models with predicted large non-Gaussianity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D22(2013) 1350034 [1303.3146]

    2013 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Young and C.T

    S. Young and C.T. Byrnes,Primordial black holes in non-Gaussian regimes,JCAP 08(2013) 052 [1307.4995]

    2013 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Kawasaki, N

    M. Kawasaki, N. Kitajima and T.T. Yanagida,Primordial black hole formation from an axionlike curvaton model, Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 063519 [1207.2550]

    2013 arXiv

  40. [48]

    K. Ando, K. Inomata, M. Kawasaki, K. Mukaida and T.T. Yanagida,Primordial black holes for the LIGO events in the axionlike curvaton model, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 123512 [1711.08956]

    2018 arXiv

  41. [49]

    K. Ando, M. Kawasaki and H. Nakatsuka,Formation of primordial black holes in an axionlike curvaton model, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 083508 [1805.07757]

    2018 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Chen and Y.-F

    C. Chen and Y.-F. Cai,Primordial black holes from sound speed resonance in the inflaton-curvaton mixed scenario, JCAP10(2019) 068 [1908.03942]

    2019 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Inomata, M

    K. Inomata, M. Kawasaki, K. Mukaida and T.T. Yanagida,NANOGrav Results and LIGO-Virgo Primordial Black Holes in Axionlike Curvaton Models,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 131301 [2011.01270]

    2021 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Kawasaki and H

    M. Kawasaki and H. Nakatsuka,Gravitational waves from type II axion-like curvaton model and its implication for NANOGrav result, JCAP05(2021) 023 [2101.11244]

    2021 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Pi and M

    S. Pi and M. Sasaki,Primordial black hole formation in nonminimal curvaton scenarios,Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) L101301 [2112.12680]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Liu,The primordial black hole from running curvaton,Chin

    L.-H. Liu,The primordial black hole from running curvaton,Chin. Phys. C47 (2023) 015105 [2107.07310]

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    D.-S. Meng, C. Yuan and Q.-G. Huang,Primordial black holes generated by the non-minimal spectator field, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.66(2023) 280411 [2212.03577]

    2023 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Ferrante, G

    G. Ferrante, G. Franciolini, A. Iovino, Junior. and A. Urbano,Primordial black holes in the curvaton model: possible connections to pulsar timing arrays and dark matter,JCAP 06(2023) 057 [2305.13382]

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Inomata, M

    K. Inomata, M. Kawasaki, K. Mukaida and T.T. Yanagida,Axion curvaton model for the gravitational waves observed by pulsar timing arrays,Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 043508 [2309.11398]

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    A.D. Gow, T. Miranda and S. Nurmi,Primordial black holes from a curvaton scenario with strongly non-Gaussian perturbations,JCAP 11(2023) 006 [2307.03078]

    2023 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Starobinsky,STOCHASTIC DE SITTER (INFLATIONARY) STAGE IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE, Lect

    A.A. Starobinsky,STOCHASTIC DE SITTER (INFLATIONARY) STAGE IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE, Lect. Notes Phys.246(1986) 107

    1986

  52. [60]

    Honda, R

    M. Honda, R. Jinno and K. Tokeshi,Exactly solvable stochastic spectator, 2409.16272

    arXiv

  53. [61]

    Cooper, A

    F. Cooper, A. Khare and U. Sukhatme,Supersymmetry and quantum mechanics, Phys. Rept.251 (1995) 267 [hep-th/9405029]

    1995 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Crum,Associated Sturm-Liouville systems, The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics6 (1955) 121

    M.M. Crum,Associated Sturm-Liouville systems, The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics6 (1955) 121. – 31 –

    1955

  55. [63]

    Gendenshtein,Derivation of Exact Spectra of the Schrodinger Equation by Means of Supersymmetry, JETP Lett.38 (1983) 356

    L.E. Gendenshtein,Derivation of Exact Spectra of the Schrodinger Equation by Means of Supersymmetry, JETP Lett.38 (1983) 356

    1983

  56. [65]

    Lerner and S

    R.N. Lerner and S. Melville,Quantifying the ’naturalness’ of the curvaton model,JCAP 07(2014) 026 [1402.3176]

    2014 arXiv

  57. [66]

    Lyth,Non-Gaussianity and cosmic uncertainty in curvaton-type models,JCAP06 (2006) 015 [astro-ph/0602285]

    D.H. Lyth,Non-Gaussianity and cosmic uncertainty in curvaton-type models,JCAP06 (2006) 015 [astro-ph/0602285]

    2006 arXiv

  58. [67]

    Lyth,The curvature perturbation in a box,JCAP 12(2007) 016 [0707.0361]

    D.H. Lyth,The curvature perturbation in a box,JCAP 12(2007) 016 [0707.0361]

    2007 arXiv

  59. [68]

    Salopek and J.R

    D.S. Salopek and J.R. Bond,Nonlinear evolution of long wavelength metric fluctuations in inflationary models, Phys. Rev. D42 (1990) 3936

    1990

  60. [69]

    Deruelle and D

    N. Deruelle and D. Langlois,Long wavelength iteration of Einstein’s equations near a space-time singularity, Phys. Rev. D52 (1995) 2007 [gr-qc/9411040]

    1995 arXiv

  61. [70]

    Starobinsky,Multicomponent de Sitter (Inflationary) Stages and the Generation of Perturbations,JETP Lett.42(1985) 152

    A.A. Starobinsky,Multicomponent de Sitter (Inflationary) Stages and the Generation of Perturbations,JETP Lett.42(1985) 152

    1985

  62. [71]

    Sasaki and E.D

    M. Sasaki and E.D. Stewart,A General analytic formula for the spectral index of the density perturbations produced during inflation,Prog. Theor. Phys.95 (1996) 71 [astro-ph/9507001]

    1996 arXiv

  63. [72]

    Sasaki and T

    M. Sasaki and T. Tanaka,Superhorizon scale dynamics of multiscalar inflation, Prog. Theor. Phys.99(1998) 763 [gr-qc/9801017]

    1998 arXiv

  64. [73]

    Lyth, K.A

    D.H. Lyth, K.A. Malik and M. Sasaki,A General proof of the conservation of the curvature perturbation,JCAP 05(2005) 004 [astro-ph/0411220]

    2005 arXiv

  65. [74]

    Fujita, M

    T. Fujita, M. Kawasaki, Y. Tada and T. Takesako,A new algorithm for calculating the curvature perturbations in stochastic inflation,JCAP 12(2013) 036 [1308.4754]

    2013 arXiv

  66. [75]

    Fujita, M

    T. Fujita, M. Kawasaki and Y. Tada,Non-perturbative approach for curvature perturbations in stochastic𝛿𝑁 formalism,JCAP 10(2014) 030 [1405.2187]

    2014 arXiv

  67. [76]

    Vennin and A.A

    V. Vennin and A.A. Starobinsky,Correlation Functions in Stochastic Inflation,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015) 413 [1506.04732]

    2015 arXiv

  68. [77]

    B.L. Hu, J.P. Paz and Y. Zhang,Quantum origin of noise and fluctuations in cosmology, inThe Origin of Structure in the Universe, 1992 [gr-qc/9512049]

    1992 arXiv

  69. [78]

    Casini, R

    H. Casini, R. Montemayor and P. Sisterna,Stochastic approach to inflation. 2. Classicality, coarse graining and noises,Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 063512 [gr-qc/9811083]

    1999 arXiv

  70. [79]

    Winitzki and A

    S. Winitzki and A. Vilenkin,Effective noise in stochastic description of inflation,Phys. Rev. D61(2000) 084008 [gr-qc/9911029]

    2000 arXiv

  71. [80]

    Matarrese, M.A

    S. Matarrese, M.A. Musso and A. Riotto,Influence of superhorizon scales on cosmological observables generated during inflation, JCAP05(2004) 008 [hep-th/0311059]

    2004 arXiv

  72. [81]

    Liguori, S

    M. Liguori, S. Matarrese, M. Musso and A. Riotto,Stochastic inflation and the lower multipoles in the CMB anisotropies, JCAP08(2004) 011 [astro-ph/0405544]

    2004 arXiv

  73. [82]

    Breuer and K.E

    H.P. Breuer and K.E. Kunze,Stochastic inflation with coloured noise,AIP Conf. Proc.841 (2006) 314. – 32 –

    2006

  74. [83]

    Mahbub and A

    R. Mahbub and A. De,Smooth coarse-graining and colored noise dynamics in stochastic inflation, JCAP09 (2022) 045 [2204.03859]

    2022 arXiv

  75. [84]

    Risken and H

    H. Risken and H. Haken,The Fokker-Planck Equation: Methods of Solution and Applications Second Edition, Springer (1989)

    1989

  76. [85]

    Starobinsky and J

    A.A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama,Equilibrium state of a selfinteracting scalar field in the De Sitter background,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 6357 [astro-ph/9407016]

    1994 arXiv

  77. [86]

    Gradshteyn and I.M

    I.S. Gradshteyn and I.M. Ryzhik,Table of integrals, series, and products, Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, Seventh ed. (2007)

    2007

  78. [87]

    Hardwick, V

    R.J. Hardwick, V. Vennin, C.T. Byrnes, J. Torrado and D. Wands,The stochastic spectator,JCAP 10(2017) 018 [1701.06473]

    2017 arXiv

  79. [88]

    Abramowitz and I.A

    M. Abramowitz and I.A. Stegun,Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, Dover, New York, Ninth Dover printing, Tenth GPO printing ed. (1964)

    1964

  80. [89]

    Lyth and A.R

    D.H. Lyth and A.R. Liddle,The Primordial Density Perturbation: Cosmology, Inflation and the Origin of Structure, Cambridge University Press (2009)

    2009

  81. [90]

    Enqvist, S

    K. Enqvist, S. Nurmi, O. Taanila and T. Takahashi,Non-Gaussian Fingerprints of Self-Interacting Curvaton, JCAP04(2010) 009 [0912.4657]

    2010 arXiv

  82. [91]

    Enqvist,The self-interacting curvaton,Prog

    K. Enqvist,The self-interacting curvaton,Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.190 (2011) 62 [1012.1711]

    2011 arXiv

  83. [92]

    Kofman,Probing string theory with modulated cosmological fluctuations, astro-ph/0303614

    L. Kofman,Probing string theory with modulated cosmological fluctuations, astro-ph/0303614

    arXiv

  84. [93]

    Dvali, A

    G. Dvali, A. Gruzinov and M. Zaldarriaga,New mechanism for generating density perturbations from inflation, Phys. Rev. D69 (2004) 023505 [astro-ph/0303591]

    2004 arXiv

  85. [94]

    Boubekeur and P

    L. Boubekeur and P. Creminelli,Right-handed neutrinos as the source of density perturbations,Phys. Rev. D 73(2006) 103516 [hep-ph/0602052]

    2006 arXiv

  86. [95]

    Zaldarriaga,Non-Gaussianities in models with a varying inflaton decay rate,Phys

    M. Zaldarriaga,Non-Gaussianities in models with a varying inflaton decay rate,Phys. Rev. D69 (2004) 043508 [astro-ph/0306006]

    2004 arXiv

  87. [96]

    Bauer, M.L

    C.W. Bauer, M.L. Graesser and M.P. Salem,Fluctuating annihilation cross sections and the generation of density perturbations,Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 023512 [astro-ph/0502113]

    2005 arXiv

  88. [97]

    Suyama and M

    T. Suyama and M. Yamaguchi,Non-Gaussianity in the modulated reheating scenario, Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 023505 [0709.2545]

    2008 arXiv

  89. [98]

    Choi and O

    K.-Y. Choi and O. Seto,Modulated reheating by curvaton,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 123528 [1204.1419]

    2012 arXiv

  90. [99]

    Langlois and T

    D. Langlois and T. Takahashi,Density Perturbations from Modulated Decay of the Curvaton,JCAP 04(2013) 014 [1301.3319]

    2013 arXiv

  91. [100]

    Assadullahi, H

    H. Assadullahi, H. Firouzjahi, M.H. Namjoo and D. Wands,Modulated curvaton decay,JCAP 03(2013) 041 [1301.3439]

    2013 arXiv

  92. [101]

    Enomoto, K

    S. Enomoto, K. Kohri and T. Matsuda,Modulated decay in the multi-component Universe,JCAP 08(2013) 047 [1301.3787]

    2013 arXiv

  93. [102]

    Bassett, S

    B.A. Bassett, S. Tsujikawa and D. Wands,Inflation dynamics and reheating,Rev. Mod. Phys.78(2006) 537 [astro-ph/0507632]. – 33 –

    2006 arXiv

  94. [103]

    Kitajima, D

    N. Kitajima, D. Langlois, T. Takahashi, T. Takesako and S. Yokoyama,Thermal Effects and Sudden Decay Approximation in the Curvaton Scenario, JCAP10(2014) 032 [1407.5148]

    2014 arXiv

  95. [104]

    Gauss,Disquisitiones generales circa seriem infinitam, Apud H

    C. Gauss,Disquisitiones generales circa seriem infinitam, Apud H. Dieterich (1813)

  96. [105]

    Dixon,Summation of a certain Series, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Societys1-35(1902) 284

    A.C. Dixon,Summation of a certain Series, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Societys1-35(1902) 284

    1902

  97. [106]

    Andrews, R

    G. Andrews, R. Askey and R. Roy,Special Functions, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, Cambridge University Press (1999). – 34 –

    1999

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.