Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 69 references

Stochastic Analysis and White Noise Calculus of Nonlinear Wave Equations with Application to Laser Propagation and Generation

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Five laser propagation and generation models share one stochastic existence-and-uniqueness theorem.

desk verdict A useful survey-style framework for stochastic laser models, but the main existence-uniqueness theorems are unproved and the central Itô integral is not defined. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16013 v2 pith:JDS3MIOB submitted 2024-11-24 math.AP math-phmath.FAmath.MPmath.PRmath.QA

Sivaguru S. Sritharan , Saba Mudaliar This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath-phmath.FAmath.MPmath.PRmath.QA MSC 81S2081V1060G5160H1560H17
keywords whitenoisecalculussemilinearstochasticevolutionssemigroupmethodsMaxwell-DiracequationsZakharovsystemSchrödingerequationnonlinearquantization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's aim is to show that five stochastic laser models—continuous and pulse propagation (stochastic nonlinear Schrödinger and random Klein-Gordon), the Zakharov system for laser-plasma interaction, Maxwell-Dirac equations for free-electron lasers, and sine-Gordon soliton dynamics—are instances of one abstract semilinear evolution equation in a Hilbert space. For that unified equation the paper proves existence and uniqueness of mild solutions at three levels of stochastic quantization: Itô noise, white-noise functionals with Wick products, and operator-valued quantum white noise. If the theorems are correct, a single set of hypotheses on the linear generator and nonlinearity controls all five models, and the individual equations inherit local well-posedness and moment estimates. This matters because it gives laser propagation and generation models a common starting point for approximation, numerical simulation, and filtering under random media fluctuations.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the mild form $\phi(t)=e^{-iAt}\phi(0)+\int_0^t e^{-iA(t-s)}J(\phi(s))\,ds+\int_0^t e^{-iA(t-s)}\phi(s)\,dW(s)$, whose free propagator $e^{-iAt}$ is a unitary group because $A$ is self-adjoint. The nonlinearity hypothesis (growth and Lipschitz estimates on $A^jJ$) makes the solution map a contraction in a graph-norm space, yielding the deterministic Theorem 2.5. The white-noise level uses the S-transform to convert Wick products into ordinary products, so the stochastic equation becomes the deterministic equation (2.1); the characterization theorems for generalized functionals and for operator symbols then return unique solutions. The operator Wick product $\Xi\diamond\phi$ is the Fock-space multiplication rule that lets a white-noise operator act on the solution.

What would settle it

Take $H=\ell^2$ with trace-class covariance $Q$, write the Itô term term-by-term as $\sum_i\sqrt{\lambda_i}\int_0^t e^{-iA(t-s)}\phi_i(s)\,d\beta_i(s)$, and check whether the asserted Hilbert-Schmidt estimate $\|\phi(r)\sqrt{Q}\|_{HS}$ follows from the stated assumptions. If the integrand $\phi(s)$ is not shown to lie in the Hilbert-Schmidt space $HS(Q^{1/2}H,H)$, the stochastic convolution inequality used in Theorem 3.1 has no object to apply to, and equation (3.1) is not yet a well-posed equation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that the semilinear stochastic evolution $\partial_t\phi=(-iA+V(t))\phi+J(\phi)$ in a Hilbert space $H$, with $A$ self-adjoint and $J$ satisfying Hypothesis 2.1, has a unique mild solution in each of three senses. Theorem 3.1 produces a unique $\Sigma_t$-adapted $H$-valued process solving (3.1) up to a stopping time with an $L^2$ moment bound; Theorem 3.3 produces a unique generalized white-noise solution in $((E)\otimes H)^*$ solving the Wick-quantized equation (1.3); Proposition 3.1 produces a unique operator-valued solution in $L((E)_\beta\otimes H,(E)_\beta^*\otimes H)$ to the operator-Wick equation (1.4). Section 4 argues that each of the five laser models fits the same hypotheses, so all five inherit these existence-and-uniqueness results.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the stochastic integral $\int_0^t e^{-iA(t-s)}\phi(s)\,dW(s)$ and the corresponding Wick products are well defined for an $H$-valued process $\phi$ and an $H$-valued Wiener process $W$, even though the paper does not specify the multiplication rule or the Hilbert-Schmidt structure that makes the integrand admissible.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Each of the five models inherits a local existence-and-uniqueness theorem for stochastic mild solutions from one set of hypotheses on $A$ and $J$.
  • The Itô theorem supplies an $L^2$ moment bound and a stopping-time tail estimate, so the local solution has quantitative control useful for approximation and simulation.
  • The white-noise and operator-valued formulations give two additional, more singular solution concepts, so the same model can be quantized at different levels of noise regularity.
  • The unified setup gives a single target for future numerical schemes and nonlinear filters, rather than a separate stochastic theory for each laser model.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A concrete next step would be to verify Hypothesis 2.1 in full detail for the Maxwell-Dirac and Zakharov systems; Section 4 sketches the fit and cites prior estimates, but does not carry out the estimates itself.
  • If the three solution concepts are compared on a common model such as stochastic nonlinear Schrödinger with smooth noise, one would expect the Itô and white-noise solutions to coincide; that consistency check is not performed here.
  • The operator-Wick formulation opens a route to quantum-probabilistic treatments of laser-plasma interactions, for example filtering with quantum white noise, which the paper leaves for later work.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a unified abstract framework for a class of nonlinear stochastic wave equations arising in laser generation and propagation. It presents three formulations: an Itô-type mild equation (1.2), a white-noise formulation with Wick products (1.3), and an operator-valued white-noise formulation (1.4). The paper claims local/global existence and uniqueness results in each setting (Theorems 3.1, 3.3, Proposition 3.1), supported by deterministic semigroup solvability theorems in Section 2, and it sketches how five physical models (stochastic nonlinear Schrödinger, nonlinear Klein-Gordon, Zakharov, Maxwell-Dirac, and sine-Gordon equations) fit the abstract hypotheses.

Significance. If the main theorems were established, the paper would provide a useful common umbrella for stochastic well-posedness results across several classical laser-plasma and free-electron-laser models, and it would give a template for white-noise and operator-Wick treatments of multiplicative noise. The paper also performs a useful service by collecting and comparing the physical models and by pointing to existing deterministic semilinear theory. However, the central claims are currently not supported: the key stochastic integral is not defined, the principal contraction estimate is asserted without a valid justification, and the two white-noise existence theorems are either stated without proof or explicitly deferred to forthcoming papers. As a result, the significance at present is largely programmatic.

major comments (5)
  1. [§3.1, Eq. (1.2) and Eq. (3.1)] The stochastic integral ∫_0^t e^{-iA(t-s)}φ(s)dW(s) is not defined. In (3.1), W is an H-valued Wiener process with trace-class covariance Q, while φ(s) is an H-valued process. Standard infinite-dimensional Itô theory (e.g., Da Prato–Zabczyk) requires an operator-valued integrand Φ(s) ∈ HS(Q^{1/2}H,H), and the paper neither specifies such an operator nor supplies a multiplication rule that would make the expression meaningful. Theorem 3.1 therefore asserts existence and uniqueness for an equation that, as written, has no rigorous meaning.
  2. [§3.1, proof of Theorem 3.1] The stochastic convolution estimate is not valid as stated. The proof uses ‖φ(r)√Q‖²_HS ≤ (trQ)‖φ(r)‖². For the natural multiplication-operator reading on H = L², one has ‖M_φ Q^{1/2}‖²_HS = Σ_i λ_i ‖φ e_i‖², which is not bounded by trQ‖φ‖² without additional assumptions on Q or φ. Since this estimate drives the contraction argument, the proof of Theorem 3.1 breaks at a load-bearing point; a different interpretation of the integral would need to be defined and proved, not merely asserted.
  3. [§3.2, Theorem 3.3 and Proposition 3.1] The central white-noise existence claims are not proved in this paper. Theorem 3.3 is stated in a single sentence with no proof, and Proposition 3.1 explicitly says that the proof will be completed in the forthcoming papers [56,57]. This is not a presentation issue: these results are the paper's main new claims about equations (1.3) and (1.4), and the reader cannot verify them from the manuscript alone.
  4. [§2.3, Eq. (2.1) vs. Eq. (2.2)] There is an unexplained sign and factor mismatch between the strong form and the mild form. Equation (2.2) is ∂_t φ = −iAφ + J(φ) + Θ(ζ+zη)φ, whose mild form should be φ(t)=e^{-iAt}φ(0)+∫_0^t e^{-iA(t−s)}(J(φ(s))+Θ(ζ+zη)φ(s))ds. Equation (2.1) instead contains e^{iAt}φ(0) and an extra factor i multiplying the integrals. Since (2.1) is the S-transformed equation that feeds the white-noise solvability results, this inconsistency affects the logical chain of Section 3.2.
  5. [§2.3, Theorem 2.5 and Theorem 2.9] The treatment of the extra term Θ(ζ+zη)φ is not sufficient. Theorem 2.5's proof asserts that this term 'can be absorbed' into J or handled separately, but no hypotheses on Θ are stated beyond holomorphy in z and real analyticity in ζ,η, and the contraction estimate merely calls Θ bounded. Theorem 2.9 additionally requires a bound on J′(φ(t)) and a solution theory for the derivative equation (2.5), neither of which is established. These steps are needed for the S-transform inversion via Theorem 3.2 and for the symbol calculus in Theorem 3.5, so they are load-bearing rather than cosmetic.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4.1, after Eq. (4.3)] The text says Δ⊥ is the two-dimensional Laplacian in the variables x2,x3, but x3 is the propagation direction that is subsequently renamed as time; the transverse Laplacian should be in x1,x2. This appears to be a typographical slip that obscures the derivation.
  2. [§3.1] The filtered probability space is written (Ω,Σ,Σt,m), but the paper later uses Σt-adapted processes without stating whether the processes are required to be progressively measurable; standard infinite-dimensional Itô theory needs progressive measurability for the stochastic integral.
  3. [§3.1, Wiener chaos expansion] In the display after the Wiener expansion, the text writes E[‖ϕ‖]² where the surrounding formula clearly intends E[‖ϕ‖²]; this typo makes the second moment formula confusing.
  4. [§3.2] The symbol m is used both for the probability measure in §3.1 and for an exponent/constant in the operator Wick quantization definition; this collision makes the notation in the paragraph around Theorem 3.5 hard to follow.
  5. [References] The citation [37] for infinite-dimensional Riccati equations and for Lemma 5.3.3 / Theorem 6.4.2 appears to be a book on initial value methods; the relevance is unclear and should be checked.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The deterministic core is self-contained, but the two most general stochastic results (Theorem 3.3 and Proposition 3.1) lean on the authors' own prior and forthcoming papers for essential definitions and for the completion of the proof.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 3.2, Proposition 3.1, final paragraph of the proof]
    "Proof would then be completed by taking λ → ∞ and μ → ∞. These methods will be elaborated in the forthcoming papers [56, 57]."

    Proposition 3.1 is the paper's main existence/uniqueness claim for the operator-valued (quantum stochastic) equation (1.4). The proof does not complete the argument in this paper: both sketched routes end by deferring the finishing steps to the authors' own in-preparation papers [56, 57]. Thus the central claim is justified by a self-citation chain to unavailable work, rather than by a derivation contained in the manuscript. This is load-bearing self-reference rather than independent support.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section 3.2, first paragraph and the S-transform step before Theorem 3.3]
    "White noise method for stochastic partial differential equations has been studied in [15, 25, 55]."

    Theorem 3.3 is the paper's existence/uniqueness result for the H-valued white-noise equation (1.3). The vector-valued Wick products needed to formulate and S-transform (1.3) are introduced by reference to the authors' own prior paper [55]; the only Wick product actually defined in this paper (Definition 3.1) is for scalar generalized functionals in (E)*. The later assertion S(:J(ϕ):) = J(Sϕ) is used for the H-valued nonlinearity without a vector-valued S-transform or a vector-valued Wick product being constructed here. The theorem therefore inherits its well-posedness from a same-author citation rather than from definitions and proofs contained in this paper.

full rationale

The deterministic core (Theorem 2.5 and the analyticity theorems) is a standard Banach-space fixed-point argument and is not circular: the contraction estimate uses Hypothesis 2.1 and semigroup bounds stated in the paper. The Itô theorem (Theorem 3.1) also attempts a genuine fixed-point proof; however, its stochastic convolution estimate is not justified for the given integrand, and the displayed bound ‖φ(r)√Q‖²_HS ≤ (trQ)‖φ(r)‖² is not valid for the multiplication-operator interpretation. That is a correctness defect rather than circularity, so it does not raise the circularity score by itself. The circularity burden comes from the self-citation chain around the two most general stochastic results: Proposition 3.1 explicitly defers the completion of its proof to the authors' forthcoming [56, 57], and Theorem 3.3 relies on the vector-valued Wick calculus imported from the authors' own [55], which is not reconstructed or verified here. These are not machine-checked or externally falsified results; they are same-author citations used as load-bearing justification. Consequently, the paper has substantial independent mathematical content, but the central existence/uniqueness claims for the white-noise and operator-valued formulations are partly outsourced to the authors' own prior and future work. This corresponds to a moderate self-citation circularity score of 4, not a stronger reduction-by-construction score, because the deterministic machinery and the S-transform/characterization framework are standard external tools.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data in this theoretical paper. The axioms listed are the standard semigroup and Gelfand-triple assumptions plus two ad hoc assumptions specific to the paper's route: the absorption of the random potential term into the nonlinearity, and the well-definedness of the H-valued stochastic integral.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math The operator A is self-adjoint and iA is m-dissipative, so e^{-iAt} is a unitary group (Stone/Hille-Yosida).
    Invoked throughout Section 2.1 as the underpinning of the free propagator; standard semigroup theory (Theorems 2.1-2.4).
  • domain assumption The nonlinearity J satisfies Hypothesis 2.1 and the a priori boundedness assumptions of Theorem 2.7 for all five laser models.
    Needed for global existence; the paper only indicates (with citations) that estimates are satisfied, and provides Lemma 4.1/4.2 for two models; no proofs are given for Maxwell-Dirac or Zakharov in this paper.
  • domain assumption The Kubo-Takenaka conditions on the Gelfand triple guarantee delta_t in E* and the existence of the Hida derivative partial_t = D_{delta_t}.
    Used in Section 3.2 to define the annihilation/creation operators and time-localized white noise; standard but assumed.
  • ad hoc to paper The deterministic solution phi(t,z) of (2.1) is entire in z and satisfies the growth bound required by the characterization theorems (Theorems 3.2 and 3.5) so that the S-transform can be inverted.
    This is the key bridge from the S-transformed deterministic equation to the white noise solution; the paper only proves weak holomorphy (Theorem 2.9) and never derives the exponential |zeta|^2_p growth bound from estimate (2.4).
  • ad hoc to paper The Ito stochastic integral integral phi(s)dW(s) has a well-defined meaning for H-valued phi and H-valued Wiener W with trace-class Q.
    No multiplication or Hilbert-Schmidt condition is introduced; the integral is used in (1.2) and Theorem 3.1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stochastic Analysis and White Noise Calculus of Nonlinear Wave Equations with Application to Laser Propagation and Generation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JDS3MIOB

@misc{pith2026241116013,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stochastic Analysis and White Noise Calculus of Nonlinear Wave Equations with Application to Laser Propagation and Generation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JDS3MIOB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16013}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper we study a large class of nonlinear stochastic wave equations that arise in laser generation models and models for propagation in random media in a unified mathematical framework. Continuous and pulse-wave propagation models, free electron laser generation models, as well as laser-plasma interaction models have been cast in a convenient and unified abstract framework as semilinear evolution equations in a Hilbert space to enable stochastic analysis. We formulate Ito calculus and white noise calculus methods of treating stochastic terms and prove existence and uniqueness of mild solutions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [49]

    M. C. Reed, Higher order estimates and smoothness of non linear wave equations, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society , 51, (1975),No.1, 79-85

    work page 1975

  2. [1]

    Added and S

    H. Added and S. Added, Equations of Langmuir turbulence a nd nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation: smoothness and approximation, J. Functional Anal. , 79, (1988), 183-210

    work page 1988

  3. [2]

    M. A. Alshanskiy, Wiener-Itˆ o chaos expansion of Hilber t space valued random variables, Journal of Probability 2014, Article ID 786854, (2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [3]

    Barbu, Nonlinear Semigroups and Differential Equations in Banach S paces, Nordorff Publishers, Netherland, 1976

    V. Barbu, Nonlinear Semigroups and Differential Equations in Banach S paces, Nordorff Publishers, Netherland, 1976

    work page 1976

  5. [4]

    Becker and H

    W. Becker and H. Mitter, Quantum theory of a free electron laser, Z. Physik B , 35, (1979), 399-404

    work page 1979

  6. [5]

    F. A. Berezin, The Method of Second Quantization , Academic Press, New York, 1966

    work page 1966

  7. [6]

    F. A. Berezin, Wick and anti-Wick operator symbols, Math. USSR-Sb., 15, (1971), 577-606. 20 S. S. SRITHARAN AND S. MUDALIAR

    work page 1971

  8. [7]

    Cazenave and A

    T. Cazenave and A. Haraux, An Introduction to Semilinear Evolution Equations , Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1998

    work page 1998

Show all 69 references
  1. [8]

    J. M. Chadam, On the Cauchy problem for the coupled Maxwel l-Dirac equations, J. Math. Phys., 13, (1972), 597-604

    1972

  2. [9]

    J. M. Chadam, Global solutions of the Cauchy problem for t he (classical) coupled Maxwell- Dirac equations in one space dimension, Journal of Functional Analysis , 13, (1973), 173-184

    1973

  3. [10]

    J. M. Chadam, Asymptotic behavior of equations arising in quantum field theory, Applicab!e Analysis, 3, (1973), 377-402

    1973

  4. [11]

    J. M. Chadam and R. T. Glassey, On certain global solutio ns for the Cauchy problem for (classical) coupled Klein-Gordon-Dirac equations in one a nd three space dimensions, Archiv for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 54, (1974), Issue.3, 223-237

    1974

  5. [12]

    Da Prato, Quelques r´ esultats d’existence et r´ egularit´ e pour un probl´ eme non lin ´ ıre de la th´ eorie du contrˆ ole,Bull

    G. Da Prato, Quelques r´ esultats d’existence et r´ egularit´ e pour un probl´ eme non lin ´ ıre de la th´ eorie du contrˆ ole,Bull. Soc. math. France , 31-32, (1972), 127-132

    1972

  6. [13]

    Da Prato and J

    G. Da Prato and J. Zabczyk, Ergodicity for Infinite Dimensional Systems , Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 1996

    1996

  7. [14]

    Da Prato and J

    G. Da Prato and J. Zabczyk, Stochastic Equations in Infinite Dimensions , Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2014

    2014

  8. [15]

    Dermoune, Non-commutative Burgers equation, Hokkaido mathematical journal , 25, (1996), 315-332

    A. Dermoune, Non-commutative Burgers equation, Hokkaido mathematical journal , 25, (1996), 315-332

    1996

  9. [16]

    F. J. Dyson, The radiation theories of Tomonaga, Schwin ger, and Feynman, Physical Review, 75, No. 3, (1949), 486-502

    1949

  10. [17]

    Flato, J

    M. Flato, J. Simon and E. Taflin, On global solutions of th e Maxwell-Dirac equations, Commun. Math. Phys. 112, (1987), 21-49

    1987

  11. [18]

    I. M. Gelfand and N. Ya. Vilenkin, Generalized Functions, 4, Academic Press,New York, 1964

    1964

  12. [19]

    Ginibre, Y

    J. Ginibre, Y. Tsutsumi and G. Velo, On the Cauchy proble m for the Zakharov system, J. Functional Analysis, Vol. 151, (1997), 384-436

    1997

  13. [20]

    Gross, The Cauchy problem for the coupled Maxwell and Dirac equations, Communica- tions on Pure and Applied Mathematics , XIX, (1966), 1-15

    L. Gross, The Cauchy problem for the coupled Maxwell and Dirac equations, Communica- tions on Pure and Applied Mathematics , XIX, (1966), 1-15

    1966

  14. [21]

    Akers, Jonah A

    Jonathan Gustafsson, Benjamin F. Akers, Jonah A. Reege r, Sivaguru S. Sritharan, Atmo- spheric propagation of high energy lasers, Eng. Math. Lett. , 2019 (2019), Article ID 7

    2019

  15. [22]

    Hida, Brownian Motion , Springer-Verlag, New York, 1980

    T. Hida, Brownian Motion , Springer-Verlag, New York, 1980

    1980

  16. [23]

    Hida, H-H

    T. Hida, H-H. Kuo, J. Potthoff and L. Streit, White Noise: An Infinite Dimensional Cal- culus, Springer, New York, 1994

    1994

  17. [24]

    Hille and R

    E. Hille and R. S. Phillips, Functional Analysis and Semigroups , American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI., 1996

    1996

  18. [25]

    Holden, B

    H. Holden, B. Oksendal, J. Uboe and T. Zhang, Stochastic Partial Differential Equations: A Modeling, White Noise Functional Approach , Springer-Verlag, New York, 2010

    2010

  19. [26]

    U. C. Ji and P. C. Ma, Wick calculus for vector-valued Gau ssian white noise functionals, Probability and Mathematical Statistics , 41, (2021), No.2, 283–302

    2021

  20. [27]

    Kato, Perturbation Theory of Linear Operators , Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976

    T. Kato, Perturbation Theory of Linear Operators , Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976

    1976

  21. [28]

    Kato, Linear and quasi-linear equations of evolutio ns of hyperbolic type, in: Hyperbol- icity, Edited by G

    T. Kato, Linear and quasi-linear equations of evolutio ns of hyperbolic type, in: Hyperbol- icity, Edited by G. Da Prato and G. Geymonat, CIME Summer School, 72,(1976),125-191, Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    1976

  22. [29]

    Yu. G. Kondratiev and L. Streit, Spaces of white noise di stributions: Constructions, de- scriptions, applications, I, Rep. Math. Phys. , 33, (1993), 341-366

    1993

  23. [30]

    Kre´ e and R

    P. Kre´ e and R. Raczka, Kernels and symbols of operators in quantum field theory, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e, A28, (1978), 41-73

    1978

  24. [31]

    H. J. Kupier and S. M. Shew, Strong solutions for infinite dimensional Riccati equations arising in transport theory, SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 11, (1980), No.2, 211-222

    1980

  25. [32]

    H. J. Kupier, Generalized operator Riccati equations, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 16, (1985), No. 4, 675-694

    1985

  26. [33]

    Kubo and S

    I. Kubo and S. Takenaka, Calculus on Gaussian white nois e I-IV, Proc. Japan Acad. , 56A (1980), 376-380; 411-416; 57A (1981), 433-437; 58A (1982), 186-189. STOCHASTIC ANALYSIS OF NONLINEAR W A VE EQUATIONS 21

    1980

  27. [34]

    463, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975

    H-H, Kuo, Gaussian Measures in Banach Spaces , Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 463, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975

    1975

  28. [35]

    H-H, Kuo, White Noise Distribution Theory , CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fl., 1996

    1996

  29. [36]

    J. M. Madey, Invention of the Free Electron Laser, Reviews of Accelerator Science and Technology, 3, (2010) 1–12

    2010

  30. [37]

    G. H. Meyer, Edited, Initial Value Methods for Boundary Value Problems: Theory and Applications of Invariant Embedding, Academic Press, New Y ork, 1973

    1973

  31. [38]

    M. T. Mohan and S. S. Sritharan, Lp-solutions to stochastic Navier-Stokes equation with L´ evy noise withLm initial data, Evolution Equation and Control Theory , 6,(2017), No. 3, 409-425

    2017

  32. [39]

    M. T. Mohan and S. S. Sritharan, Stochastic quasilinear symmetric hyperbolic system per- turbed by L´ evy noise, Journal of Pure and Applied Functional Analysis , 3, (2018), No.1, 137-178

    2018

  33. [40]

    Obata, An analytic characterization of symbols of op erators on white noise functionals, J

    N. Obata, An analytic characterization of symbols of op erators on white noise functionals, J. Math. Soc. Japan , 45, (1993),No.3, 421-445

    1993

  34. [41]

    Obata, White Noise Calculus and Fock Space , Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994

    N. Obata, White Noise Calculus and Fock Space , Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994

    1994

  35. [42]

    Obata, Operator calculus on vector-valued white noi se functionals, J

    N. Obata, Operator calculus on vector-valued white noi se functionals, J. Functional Anal- ysis, 121, (1994), 185-232

    1994

  36. [43]

    Obata, Quantum stochastic differential equations in terms of quantum white noise, Non- linear Analysis, Theory, Methods and Applications , 30, (1997),No.1, 279-290

    N. Obata, Quantum stochastic differential equations in terms of quantum white noise, Non- linear Analysis, Theory, Methods and Applications , 30, (1997),No.1, 279-290

    1997

  37. [44]

    Obata, Wick product of white noise operators and quan tum stochastic differential equa- tions, J

    N. Obata, Wick product of white noise operators and quan tum stochastic differential equa- tions, J. Math. Soc. Japan , 51, (1999), No.3, 613-641

    1999

  38. [45]

    Ouerdiane, Alg´ ebres nucl´ eaires de fonctions enti´ eres et ´ equations aux deriv´ ees partielles stochastiques, Nagoya Mathematical Journal , 151, (1998), 107-127

    H. Ouerdiane, Alg´ ebres nucl´ eaires de fonctions enti´ eres et ´ equations aux deriv´ ees partielles stochastiques, Nagoya Mathematical Journal , 151, (1998), 107-127

    1998

  39. [46]

    G. C. Papanicolaou, D. McLaughlin, and R. Burridge, A St ochastic Gaussian Beam, J. Math, Phys. , 14, (1973), No.1, 84-89

    1973

  40. [47]

    Parisi and Y

    G. Parisi and Y. S. W u, Perturbation theory without gaug e fixing, Scientia Sinica, XXIV, (1981),No.4, 483-496

    1981

  41. [48]

    Pazy, Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to Partial Differential Equations , Springer-Verlag, New York, 1983

    A. Pazy, Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to Partial Differential Equations , Springer-Verlag, New York, 1983

    1983

  42. [50]

    M. C. Reed, Abstract Nonlinear Wave Equations , Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 507, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1976

    1976

  43. [51]

    Segal, Nonlinear Semigroups, Annals of Mathematics , 78, (1963),No.2, 339-363

    I. Segal, Nonlinear Semigroups, Annals of Mathematics , 78, (1963),No.2, 339-363

    1963

  44. [52]

    Simon, The P (Φ) 2 Euclidean (Quantum) Field Theory , Princeton Series in Physics, Princeton, NJ, 1974

    B. Simon, The P (Φ) 2 Euclidean (Quantum) Field Theory , Princeton Series in Physics, Princeton, NJ, 1974

    1974

  45. [53]

    Sprangle, J

    P. Sprangle, J. R. Pe˜ nano, and B. Hafizi, Propagation of intense short laser pulses in the atmosphere, Phys. Rev. E 66, Issue: 4, 2002, 1-21

    2002

  46. [54]

    Sprangle, J

    P. Sprangle, J. P. Pe˜ nano, A. Ting, B. Hafizi and D. E. Gor don, Propagation of short, High-intensity Laser pulses in air, Journal of Directed Energy , 1, (2003), 73-92

    2003

  47. [55]

    S. S. Sritharan and S. Mudaliar, Stochastic quantizati on of Laser propagation models, In- finite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Relat ed Topics , Published on-line July 2023

    2023

  48. [56]

    S. S. Sritharan and S. Mudaliar, Approximations of stoc hastic nonlinear wave equations, in preparation (2025)

    2025

  49. [57]

    S. S. Sritharan and S. Mudaliar, Filtering of stochasti c nonlinear wave equations, in prepa- ration (2025)

    2025

  50. [58]

    Strauss, Nonlinear Wave Equations , CBMS Regional Conference Series No.73, American Mathematical Society, Providence,1989

    W. Strauss, Nonlinear Wave Equations , CBMS Regional Conference Series No.73, American Mathematical Society, Providence,1989

    1989

  51. [59]

    Strauss, Nonlinear invariant wave equations, Invariant Wave Equations , Lecture notes in Physics, No

    W. Strauss, Nonlinear invariant wave equations, Invariant Wave Equations , Lecture notes in Physics, No. 78, (1978), 197-249, Springer-Verlag, New Y ork

    1978

  52. [60]

    J. W. Strohbehn, Laser Beam Propagation in the Atmosphere , Springer-Verlag, New York, 1978. 22 S. S. SRITHARAN AND S. MUDALIAR

    1978

  53. [61]

    Sulem and P-L

    C. Sulem and P-L. Sulem, Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger Equations: Self-Focusing and Wave Col- lapse, Springer-Verlag, New York 1999

    1999

  54. [62]

    F. D. Tappert, The parabolic approximation method, in J oseph B. Keller, John S. Papadakis, Editors, Wave Propagation and Underwater Acoustics , Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1977

    1977

  55. [63]

    Tartar, Sur I’ ´Etude Directe d’Equations non Lin´ eaires lntervenant en Th´ eorie du Contrˆ ole Optimal, J

    L. Tartar, Sur I’ ´Etude Directe d’Equations non Lin´ eaires lntervenant en Th´ eorie du Contrˆ ole Optimal, J. Functional Analysis, 6, (1974), 1-47

    1974

  56. [64]

    Temam, Sur I’´ equation de Riccati associ´ ee ´ a des op´ erateurs non born´ es, en dimension infinie,J

    R. Temam, Sur I’´ equation de Riccati associ´ ee ´ a des op´ erateurs non born´ es, en dimension infinie,J. Functional Analysis, 7, (1971), 85-115

    1971

  57. [65]

    van Neerven, M

    J. van Neerven, M. Veraar, Maximal inequalities for sto chastic convolutions in 2-smooth Banach spaces and applications to stochastic evolution equ ations, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 378: 20190622

  58. [66]

    V. I. Tatarski, Wave Propagation in a Turbulent Medium , Dover Publishers, New York, 1961

    1961

  59. [67]

    Yosida, Functional Analysis, Springer-Verlag, New York, (1991)

    K. Yosida, Functional Analysis, Springer-Verlag, New York, (1991)

    1991

  60. [68]

    V. E. Zakharov, Collapse of Langmuir waves, Soviet Phys. JETP , 35, (1972), No.5, 908-913

    1972

  61. [69]

    Zohuri, Directed Energy Weapons: Physics of High Energy Lasers (HEL ), Springer- verlag, New York, 2016

    B. Zohuri, Directed Energy Weapons: Physics of High Energy Lasers (HEL ), Springer- verlag, New York, 2016. S. S. Sritharan: NRC-Senior Research Fellow, National Academ ies of Science, En- gineering and Medicine, U. S. Air Force Research Laboratory, W right Patterson Air Force...

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.