Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 119 references

Quantum transport of Dirac fermions in selected graphene nanosystems away from the charge-neutrality point

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Doped graphene keeps its sub-Sharvin transport signature in realistic honeycomb-lattice simulations.

desk verdict A solid analytic extension of the sub-Sharvin program with independent tight-binding checks, but the one geometry that would directly validate the W≫L premise is never simulated. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16032 v8 pith:SVZWLUJY submitted 2024-11-25 cond-mat.mes-hall

Adam Rycerz This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords graphenenanosystemssub-SharvintransportshotnoiseFanofactorcharge-transfercumulantsDiracfermionstight-bindingsimulationsLandauer-Büttikerconductance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the distinctive sub-Sharvin transport regime predicted for doped graphene is not an artifact of the idealized Dirac equation: it survives in quantum-transport simulations on the honeycomb lattice, provided the sample edges are straight and short and the sample-lead interfaces are abrupt. In this regime the conductance is reduced to about $(\pi/4)G_{\mathrm{Sharvin}}$ and the Fano factor is about $1/8$ for parallel interfaces, while a narrow-opening Corbino disk gives $(4-\pi)G_{\mathrm{Sharvin}}$ and $F\approx 0.1065$. For a wedge-shaped constriction with zigzag edges and a square central section, the simulated conductance and noise match these sub-Sharvin values for abrupt steps, and tuning the electrostatic profile toward a smooth barrier restores ordinary Sharvin behavior for electrons. For a half-Corbino disk the sub-Sharvin noise is well reproduced, whereas a circular quantum dot with irregular edges and narrow openings shows $F\approx 1/4$, the signature of a chaotic cavity, even though its conductance alone can misleadingly resemble Sharvin or sub-Sharvin values. The practical message is that experimental searches for sub-Sharvin transport should use wide, short, regularly edged openings rather than complex nanostructures.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the double-barrier transmission probability $T_{k_y}(E) = [1+(k_y/\kappa)^2 \sin^2(\kappa L)]^{-1}$ of Eq. (32), which describes an electron crossing a graphene strip between two heavily doped leads with abrupt interfaces. In the wide-sample limit $W\gg L$, the exact oscillatory expression is replaced by its random-phase average $\{T_{k_y}\}_{\mathrm{incoh}} = \sqrt{1-(k_y/k_F)^2}$, whose semicircular form is what lowers the conductance from $G_{\mathrm{Sharvin}}$ to $(\pi/4)G_{\mathrm{Sharvin}}$ and produces the nonzero Fano factor. The same average, extended to moments of $T$, yields the full set of charge-transfer cumulants for doped graphene. On the numerical side, the argument is carried by a tight-binding mode-matching calculation on a honeycomb lattice with up to about 336,000 sites, using the transfer-matrix scheme adapted from square-lattice leads to zigzag and armchair edges.

What would settle it

Measure conductance and shot noise of a single graphene constriction while continuously smoothing the electrostatic step from rectangular to fully smooth, keeping the central section square. The central claim predicts $G/G_{\mathrm{Sharvin}}$ near $\pi/4$ with $F\approx 1/8$ for the abrupt step and a crossover toward $G\approx G_{\mathrm{Sharvin}}$ with $F\ll 1$ for electrons as the step is smoothed; failing to observe the sub-Sharvin values at the abrupt step would falsify the regime.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the sub-Sharvin values derived from the effective Dirac equation, namely $G\approx(\pi/4)G_{\mathrm{Sharvin}}$ with $F\approx 1/8$ for a strip with two parallel abrupt interfaces and $G\approx(4-\pi)G_{\mathrm{Sharvin}}$ with $F\approx 0.1065$ in the narrow-opening limit of a doped graphene disk, are reproduced by tight-binding simulations of realistic honeycomb-lattice nanostructures, as long as the edges are straight and relatively short and the potential steps at the leads are abrupt. It also derives a technique for computing arbitrary charge-transfer cumulants in this regime, replacing the exact oscillatory double-barrier transmission probability by its random-phase average. The numerical comparison shows that a constriction with zigzag edges follows the sub-Sharvin values for abrupt interfaces, the half-Corbino disk tracks the narrow-opening predictions especially in the Fano factor, and a circular quantum dot with irregular edges behaves as a chaotic cavity with $F\approx 1/4$ even though its conductance alone may suggest a Sharvin or sub-Sharvin regime. The author reads this combined evidence as support for the view that sub-Sharvin transport is a real, distinguishable ballistic regime of doped graphene, controlled mainly by scattering at the sample-lead interfaces.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes the sample-lead interfaces are abrupt potential steps and the sample is wide relative to its length, so that mode mixing at the edges does not occur; if the interfaces are smooth or the edges dominate, the sub-Sharvin values give way to Sharvin or chaotic-cavity behavior.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the sub-Sharvin regime is real, a doped graphene strip with abrupt metal-like leads and $W\gg L$ should show $G\approx(\pi/4)G_{\mathrm{Sharvin}}$ rather than $G_{\mathrm{Sharvin}}$, together with shot noise $F\approx 1/8$.
  • Smoothing the potential step over the full length $L$ should continuously tune a constriction from sub-Sharvin to Sharvin behavior for electrons and suppress conductance for holes, which the simulations reproduce.
  • In a half-Corbino disk with abrupt interfaces, the Fano factor should settle near the narrow-opening value $0.1065$ away from the charge-neutrality point, while the conductance interpolates between Sharvin and $(4-\pi)G_{\mathrm{Sharvin}}$.
  • A circular quantum dot with narrow openings and irregular edges should present $F\approx 1/4$, so conductance data alone cannot identify the transport regime; noise must be measured.
  • Experimental verification of sub-Sharvin transport should target wide, short, straight-edged openings, because long or irregular edges mix modes and wash out the signature.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the mechanism rests on the conical dispersion and incoherent interface scattering rather than on evanescent waves, group-IV Dirac monolayers such as silicene, germanene, or stanene should show the same sub-Sharvin values; the paper only hints at this, so the extrapolation is an editorial one.
  • A clean falsifier experiment would gate a single constriction and continuously vary step sharpness: the predicted crossover from $G\approx(\pi/4)G_{\mathrm{Sharvin}}$, $F\approx 1/8$ to $G\approx G_{\mathrm{Sharvin}}$, $F\ll 1$ would directly test the random-phase assumption.
  • The convergence shown in Fig. 4 suggests that $k_F W\gtrsim 5$ is enough to reach the sub-Sharvin limit, implying that modest-size devices rather than very wide samples may already exhibit the regime; this is an inference from the paper's convergence analysis rather than an explicit claim.
  • Repeating the constriction simulation with armchair edges would test whether the straight-short-edge condition is orientation-independent; the paper's logic predicts sub-Sharvin values should persist.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper extends the analytic theory of the sub-Sharvin transport regime in doped graphene (conductance G≈(π/4)G_Sharvin and Fano factor F≈1/8 for parallel abrupt interfaces, with a narrow-opening Corbino variant G≈(4−π)G_Sharvin and F≈0.1065) by deriving formulas for arbitrary charge-transfer cumulants R3 and R4, and by comparing the predictions with numerical tight-binding mode-matching simulations for three classes of honeycomb-lattice nanostructures: a wedge-shaped constriction with zigzag edges, a half-Corbino disk, and circular quantum dots with and without a central hole. The numerical results show that the constriction with an abrupt potential profile reproduces sub-Sharvin conductance and Fano factor for electron doping, that smoothing the potential restores Sharvin-like behavior, that the half-Corbino disk follows the narrow-opening sub-Sharvin predictions, and that the circular dots behave instead like chaotic cavities (F≈1/4) even though their conductance may accidentally match Sharvin or sub-Sharvin values. The paper concludes that the sub-Sharvin regime is robust in discrete systems provided sample edges are straight and relatively short, and that experiments should focus on systems with wide openings.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides a concrete, parameter-free prediction set for ballistic doped graphene nanostructures: G≈(π/4)G_Sharvin with F≈1/8 for short-edge rectangular geometries, and F≈0.1065 for narrow-opening Corbino disks, both distinguishable from standard Sharvin contacts (F≈0) and chaotic cavities (F≈1/4). The analytic derivation is explicit and self-contained, including higher cumulants R3 and R4, and the numerical method is a documented mode-matching scheme with a unitarity check (εS≲10−6), which makes the reported deviations from theory meaningful. The paper also performs a useful service by compiling the transmission-probability distributions that characterize different transport regimes. The principal weakness is that the only straight-edge system used to confirm the analytic sub-Sharvin values has W/L≈1, i.e., it lies outside the W≫L regime on which the analytic derivation rests; the numerical agreement is therefore a robustness observation rather than a direct test of the derivation, and the paper's final claim would be stronger with a simulation in the W≫L limit.

major comments (1)
  1. [§V and Table III] The geometric criterion stated in the conclusions — 'straight and relatively short; i.e., with a total length comparable to or shorter than the total length of the sample-lead interfaces' — is not satisfied by the constriction used as the primary confirmation. Table III gives Ltot=254a while the total interface length is 2W≈208a, so the sample edge length exceeds the interface length by about 22%. Moreover, the central segment is square (L≈W). Because the wedges connecting the leads to the square section introduce mode mixing, the observed match to the sub-Sharvin values could in principle arise from a different mechanism than the interface-scattering that produces Eq. (41). Please provide a quantitative definition of 'relatively short' that the constriction meets, or add a numerical test with a geometry that unambiguously satisfies the stated criterion.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§II.D, Eq. (29)] In Eq. (29), the reflection probability is written as R1=|t|^2, which is a typo; it should be R1=|r|^2 (the text immediately above correctly defines r as the reflection amplitude).
  2. [Throughout] There are numerous typographical errors, including 'reallistic', 'characteritics', 'cimulants', 'dislayed', 'electostatic', 'bar-iers', and 'ao' in the caption of Fig. 6 ('the top ao the electrostatic potential barrier'). These do not affect the physics but should be corrected.
  3. [§II.E] The phrase 'we did not explicitly assume, as in Eq. (39), that the width to length ratio ... is W/L≫1' is somewhat misleading because the applicability of the double-barrier formula itself, as stated after Eq. (31), already rests on W≫L. Clarifying this logical ordering would help the reader.
  4. [§IV.B] The inset in Fig. 6(b) shows the number of propagating modes in the leads, but the panel (b) itself is described as the 'partly-smooth' case Ls=L/2. The caption could be more explicit about the energy range in which the number of modes is large enough for the multimode condition kF W≫1 to hold.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the numerical tight-binding simulations are an independent benchmark for the analytic sub-Sharvin predictions.

full rationale

The paper's central analytic results, G ≈ (π/4)G_Sharvin and F ≈ 1/8, are derived in-house from the Dirac double-barrier transmission T_ky(E) of Eq. (32) via the explicitly stated incoherent random-phase approximation in Eq. (41), followed by the integrals in Eqs. (44)-(51). This is an approximation to a stated model, not a fit to the numerical data. The tight-binding calculations in Sec. IV and Appendix A start from the independent Hamiltonian of Eqs. (63)-(66) with fixed parameters t0, V∞, and geometry, and the transmission matrix is computed by numerical mode matching; the Dirac formulas are not inputs to these simulations. The earlier self-citations [33,34] introduce the sub-Sharvin concept and some formulas, but the present paper re-derives the parallel-interface values and explicitly states the narrow-opening limit as a parameter-free analytic prediction; the self-citation is therefore not load-bearing. The constriction having W/L ≈ 1 while the analytic strip formula was motivated by W ≫ L is a regime-mismatch or robustness concern, not a circularity, because the numerical values are not constrained to equal the analytic ones by construction. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported to force a choice, and no known result is merely renamed. The derivation chain is self-contained and the comparison is an external consistency test, so no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard transport theory, the Dirac approximation, heavily doped abrupt leads, and the incoherent averaging approximation. No free parameters are fitted to the target observables; geometry and physical constants are fixed. The random-phase approximation is the main unproven ingredient, and no new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Landauer-Buttiker conductance formula and Levitov-Leskovik full counting statistics apply to noninteracting coherent transport at zero temperature.
    Used in Secs. II B and II C; these are standard results, not derived in the paper.
  • domain assumption Graphene's low-energy excitations are described by the two-dimensional Dirac-Weyl equation, and the leads are heavily doped, modeled by V_infinity approaching infinity.
    Eqs. (20) and (28) in Sec. II D; the entire analytic framework depends on this.
  • domain assumption For the strip geometry, scattering is treated as a double barrier without mode mixing, valid when W is much larger than L and when reflections from side edges do not change k_y.
    Introduced below Eq. (31) and used through Eqs. (32)-(50).
  • ad hoc to paper The rapidly oscillating sin-squared term in the double-barrier transmission can be averaged over a uniformly random phase to give Eq. (41).
    This incoherent approximation is the key step producing the sub-Sharvin values; it is tested numerically but not derived from a controlled small parameter.
  • domain assumption For the Corbino disk, conformal mapping and angular-momentum mode matching provide the transmission probabilities in Eqs. (52) and (56).
    Used in Sec. II F; the mapping relies on separability and heavily doped leads.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum transport of Dirac fermions in selected graphene nanosystems away from the charge-neutrality point." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SVZWLUJY

@misc{pith2026241116032,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum transport of Dirac fermions in selected graphene nanosystems away from the charge-neutrality point},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SVZWLUJY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16032}
}
abstract

Peculiar electronic properties of graphene, including the universal dc conductivity and the pseudodiffusive shot noise, are usually attributed to a small vicinity of the charge-neutrality point, away from which electron's effective mass raises, and nanostructures in graphene start to behave similarly to familiar Sharvin contacts in semiconducting heterostructures hosting two-dimensional electron gas. Using the effective Dirac equation for low-energy excitations it can be shown that, as long as abrupt potential steps separate the sample area from the leads, graphene-specific features can be identified even relatively far from the charge-neutrality point. Namely, the conductance is reduced, comparing to the standard Sharvin value, whereas the shot noise is amplified. Here, we confront the results of earlier analytic considerations with numerical simulations of quantum transport on the honeycomb lattice, for selected systems for which considerations starting from the Dirac equation cannot be directly adapted. For a wedge-shape constriction with zigzag edges and approximately square shape of the narrowest section, the transport characteristics can be tuned from graphene-specific sub-Sharvin values to standard Sharvin values, depending on whether the electrostatic potential profile in the narrowest section is rectangular or smooth. The half-Corbino disk with rectangular potential profile exhibits both the conductance and the noise close to the sub-Sharvin values. For a circular quantum dot with two narrow openings and irregular edges, the conductance is close to the Sharvin value, and the Fano factor approaches the value of $F=1/4$. This suggests that, in experimental attempt to verify the predictions for sub-Sharvin transport regime, one should focus rather on nanosystems, for which the scatterings on edges are insignificant next to the scatterings on sample-lead interfaces.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.16032 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a)–(e) Systems studied numerically in the work (schematic). (a) Constriction with zigzag edges containing a narrow rectangular [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Physical suppositions behind the Landauer-Büttiker formalism. Top: Basic nanoscopic systems; from left: a quantum point contact [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Rectangular graphene sample (white area) of the width [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Conductance (a), Fano factor (b), third (c), and fourth (d) charge-transfer cumulant for graphene strip dislayed as functions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a–d) Same as Fig. 4 but for the Corbino disk, see inset in (a), with the outer-to-inner radii ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Conductance in the units of g0 = 4e 2 /h (a–c) and the Fano factor (d–f) for the constriction with zigzag edges, see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Same as in Fig. 6, but for the half-Corbino disk (a,d) [see also Fig. 1(c)], circular quantum dot (b,e) [see Fig. 1(d)], and circular [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: In the half-disk case, see Figs. 7(a) and 7(d), the conduc￾tance (for E > 0) remains in the interval GSharvin ≳ G ≳ (4−π) GSharvin (notice that the radii ratio is R2/R1 = 4, and thus the relevant analytic approximations are given in Eq. (55) for the narrow-opening limi…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) A nanosystem of 24 sites carved out of the honeycomb lattice and an equivalent section of a square lattice with every second vertical bond removed (red dashed lines). (b) Schematic of an open system in computer simulation. Semi-infinite leads (with zigzag edges) ar…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

119 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    WJ6bx3GH5igDQL2i4sH23gdfqRY=

    The nanosystem In the following, we show how the computational method originally developed by Ando for a square lattice [100] can be 17 <latexit sha1_base64="WJ6bx3GH5igDQL2i4sH23gdfqRY=">AAAB3nicdVDJSgNBFHwTtxi3qEcvjUHwNMyELOYW8OIxAbNAEmJP503SpGehu0cIIVcvIl4U/CR/wb+xk4yHiBY0FFXVvFfPiwVX2nG+rMzW9s7uXnY/d3B4dHySPz1rqyiRDFssEpHselSh4CG2NNcCu7FEGngCO970dul3H...

  2. [2]

    8(b) (for zigzag edges) and 8(c) (for armchair edges)

    Solutions in the leads Keeping in mind the analogy between the honeycomb lat- tice and the square lattice mentioned above, we now consider an infinitely long wire with a width of N sites, short sections of which are schematically shown in Figs. 8(b) (for zigzag edges) and 8(c) (for armchair edges). Quantum-mechanical equation of motion can be written as T...

  3. [3]

    (A13) for zigzag edges (z.e.), with the necessary substitu- tions for armchair edges (a.e.) in Eq

    Basis for the scattering matrix The secular equation derived above, given explicitly by Eq. (A13) for zigzag edges (z.e.), with the necessary substitu- tions for armchair edges (a.e.) in Eq. (A14), can be diagonal- ized numerically using standard software packages in order to find the full set of eigenvalues ( λ) with corresponding right- eigenvectors φ(λ...

  4. [4]

    The scattering problem In the last part of this Appendix, we will use the notation relevant for the leads with zigzag edges (see Fig. 8). Never- theless, if a version of the approach for the leads with armhair edges is desired, it can be easily generated by performing the substitutions given by Eq. A14. (We emphasize here that the central section of the s...

  5. [5]

    M. J. Duff, L. B. Okun, and G. Veneziano, Trialogue on the number of fundamental constants, J. High Energy Phys. 03, 023 (2002)

    2002

  6. [6]

    J.-M. Lévy-Leblond, On the Conceptual Nature of the Phys- ical Constants, in The Reform of the International System of Units (SI): Philosophical, Historical and Sociological Issues (Routledge, London, UK, 2019), pp. 125-149. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.4324/9781351048989

    work page doi:10.4324/9781351048989 2019

  7. [7]

    T. Ando, Y . Matsumoto, and Y . Uemura, Theory of Hall Effect in a Two-Dimensional Electron System, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 39, 279 (1975)

    1975

  8. [8]

    K. v. Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, New Method for High-Accuracy Determination of the Fine-Structure Constant Based on Quantized Hall Resistance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 494 (1980)

    1980

Show all 119 references
  1. [9]

    R. B. Laughlin, Quantized Hall conductivity in two dimen- sions, Phys. Rev. B 23, 5632(R) (1981)

    1981

  2. [10]

    D. C. Tsui, H. L. Stormer, and A. C. Gossard, Two- Dimensional Magnetotransport in the Extreme Quantum Limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1559 (1982)

    1982

  3. [11]

    B. D. Josephson, The discovery of tunneling supercurrents, Rev. Mod. Phys. 46, 251 (1974)

    1974

  4. [12]

    Payagala, A

    S. Payagala, A. Rigosi, A. Panna, A. Pollarolo, M. Kruskopf, S. Schlamminger, D. Jarrett, R. Brown, R. Elmquist, D. Brown, and D. Newell, Comparison between Graphene and GaAs Quantized Hall Devices with a Dual Probe, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 69, 9374 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    Y . Tang, J. Wachter, A. Rufenacht, G. FitzPatrick, and S. Benz, 10 V Programmable Josephson V oltage Standard and its Ap- plication in Direct Comparison with the Conventional Joseph- son V oltage Standard, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 64, 3458 (2015)

    2015

  6. [14]

    Novoselov, A

    K. Novoselov, A. Geim, S. Morozov, D. Jiang, M. I. Katsnel- son, I. V . Grigorieva, S. V . Dubonos, and A. A. Firsov Two- dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene, Na- ture 438, 197 (2005)

    2005

  7. [15]

    Zhang, Y .-W

    Y . Zhang, Y .-W. Tan, H. L. Stormer, and P. Kim, Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry’s phase in graphene, Nature 438, 201 (2005)

    2005

  8. [16]

    Titov and C

    M. Titov and C. W. J. Beenakker, Josephson effect in ballistic graphene, Phys. Rev. B 74, 041401(R) (2006)

    2006

  9. [17]

    Salim, R

    S. Salim, R. Marathe, and S. Gosh, Revisiting Andreev processes in superconductor-graphene-superconductor (SGS) Josephson junctions: comparison with experimental results, Phys. Scr. 98, 065935 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    M. I. Katsnelson, Zitterbewegung, chirality, and minimal con- ductivity in graphene, Eur. Phys. J. B 51, 157 (2006)

    2006

  11. [19]

    M. I. Katsnelson, The Physics of Graphene, 2nd ed. (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2020); Chapter 3

    2020

  12. [20]

    R. R. Nair, P. Blake, A. N. Grigorenko, K. S. Novoselov, T. J. Booth, T. Stauber, N. M. R. Peres, and A. K. Geim, Fine Struc- ture Constant Defines Visual Transparency of Graphene, Sci- ence 320, 1308 (2008)

    2008

  13. [21]

    H. S. Skulason, P. E. Gaskell, and T. Szkopek, Optical reflec- tion and transmission properties of exfoliated graphite from a graphene monolayer to several hundred graphene layers, Nan- otechnology 21, 295709 (2010)

    2010

  14. [22]

    Tworzydło, B

    J. Tworzydło, B. Trauzettel, M. Titov, A. Rycerz, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Sub-Poissonian shot noise in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 246802 (2006)

    2006

  15. [23]

    Danneau, F

    R. Danneau, F. Wu, M. F. Craciun, S. Russo, M. Y . Tomi, J. Salmilehto, A. F. Morpurgo, and P. J. Hakonen, Shot Noise in Ballistic Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 196802 (2008)

    2008

  16. [24]

    Rycerz, P

    A. Rycerz, P. Recher, and M. Wimmer, Conformal mapping and shot noise in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 80, 125417 (2009)

    2009

  17. [25]

    Laitinen, G

    A. Laitinen, G. S. Paraoanu, M. Oksanen, M. F. Craciun, S. 22 Russo, E. Sonin, and P. Hakonen, Contact doping, Klein tun- neling, and asymmetry of shot noise in suspended graphene, Phys. Rev. B 93, 115413 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    Yoshino and K

    H. Yoshino and K. Murata, Significant Enhancement of Elec- tronic Thermal Conductivity of Two-Dimensional Zero-Gap Systems by Bipolar-Diffusion Effect. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 84, 024601 (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    Crossno, J

    J. Crossno, J. K. Shi, K. Wang, X. Liu, A. Harzheim, A. Lucas, S. Sachdev, P. Kim, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, T. A. Ohki, and K. C. Fong, Observation of the Dirac fluid and the break- down of the Wiedemann-Franz law in graphene, Science 351, 1058 (2016)

    2016

  20. [28]

    Rycerz, Wiedemann–Franz Law for Massless Dirac Fermions with Implications for Graphene, Materials 14, 2704 (2021)

    A. Rycerz, Wiedemann–Franz Law for Massless Dirac Fermions with Implications for Graphene, Materials 14, 2704 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Tu and S

    Y .-T. Tu and S. Das Sarma, Wiedemann-Franz law in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 107, 085401 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    G. W. Semenoff, Condensed-Matter Simulation of a Three- Dimensional Anomaly, Phys. Rev. Lett.53, 2449 (1984)

    1984

  23. [31]

    D. P. Di Vincenzo, E. J. Mele, Self-consistent effective-mass theory for intralayer screening in graphite intercalation com- pounds, Phys. Rev. B 29, 1685 (1984)

    1984

  24. [32]

    E. Zor, H. Bingol, A. Ramanaviciene, A. Ramanavicius, and M. Ersoz, An electrochemical and computational study for discrimination of D- and L-cystine by reduced graphene oxide/β-cyclodextrin, Analyst 140, 313 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    Yaghouti Niyat and M

    F. Yaghouti Niyat and M. Shahrokh Abadi, COMSOL-Based Modeling and Simulation of SnO2/rGO Gas Sensor for Detec- tion of NO2, Sci. Rep. 8, 2149 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    Suszalski, G

    D. Suszalski, G. Rut, and A. Rycerz, Lifshitz transition and thermoelectric properties of bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 97, 125403 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    M. Du, L. Du, N. Wei, W. Liu, X. Bai, and Z. Sun, Dual- gated mono–bilayer graphene junctions, Nanoscale Adv. 3, 399 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    Hadadi, A

    N. Hadadi, A. Belayadi, A. AlRabiah, O. Ly, C. Ashu Akosa, M. V ogl, H. Bahlouli, A. Manchon, and A. Abbout, Pseudo electric field and pumping valley current in graphene nanobub- bles, Phys. Rev. B 108, 195418 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    Rycerz and P

    A. Rycerz and P. Witkowski, Sub-Sharvin conductance and enhanced shot noise in doped graphene, Phys. Rev. B 104, 165413 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    Rycerz and P

    A. Rycerz and P. Witkowski, Theory of sub-Sharvin charge transport in graphene disks, Phys. Rev. B106, 155428 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Yu. V . Sharvin, A possible method for studying Fermi sur- faces, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 48, 984 (1965) [Sov. Phys. JETP 21, 655 (1965)]

    1965

  32. [40]

    B. J. van Wees, H. van Houten, C. W. J. Beenakker, J. G. Williamson, L. P. Kouwenhoven, D. van der Marel, and C. T. Foxon, Quantized conductance of point contacts in a two- dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 848 (1988)

    1988

  33. [41]

    L. I. Glazman, G. B. Lesovik, D. E. Khmel’nitskii, and R. I. Shekhter, Reflectionless quantum transport and fundamental ballistic-resistance steps in microscopic constrictions, Pi’sma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 48, 218 (1988) [JETP Lett. 48, 238 (1988).]

    1988

  34. [42]

    Bezák, Conductance quantization of an ideal Sharvin con- tact, Ann

    V . Bezák, Conductance quantization of an ideal Sharvin con- tact, Ann. Physics 322, 2603 (2007)

    2007

  35. [43]

    For the disk geometry, the width W needs to be replaced with the inner lead circumfence 2πRi

  36. [44]

    Rycerz, K

    A. Rycerz, K. Rycerz, and P. Witkowski, Thermoelectric Prop- erties of the Corbino Disk in Graphene, Materials 16, 4250 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    Rycerz, K

    A. Rycerz, K. Rycerz, and P. Witkowski, Sub-Sharvin Con- ductance and Incoherent Shot-Noise in Graphene Disks at Magnetic Field, Materials 17, 3067 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    Das Sarma and K

    S. Das Sarma and K. Yang, The enigma of the nu=0 quan- tum Hall effect in graphene, Solid State Commun. 149, 1502 (2009)

    2009

  39. [47]

    Rycerz, Magnetoconductance of the Corbino disk in graphene, Phys

    A. Rycerz, Magnetoconductance of the Corbino disk in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 81, 121404(R) (2010)

    2010

  40. [48]

    Y . Zeng, J. I. A. Li, S. A. Dietrich, O. M. Ghosh, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, and C. R. Dean, High-Quality Magne- totransport in Graphene Using the Edge-Free Corbino Geom- etry, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 137701 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    Suszalski, G

    D. Suszalski, G. Rut, and A. Rycerz, Mesoscopic valley filter in graphene Corbino disk containing a p-n junction J. Phys. Mater. 3, 015006 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    Kamada, V

    M. Kamada, V . Gall, J. Sarkar, M. Kumar, A. Laitinen, I. Gornyi, and P. Hakonen, Strong magnetoresistance in a graphene Corbino disk at low magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B 104, 115432 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8th ed

    C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8th ed. (John Willey and Sons: New York, NY , USA, 2005); Chapter 6

    2005

  44. [52]

    C. T. White and T. N. Todorov, Carbon nanotubes as long bal- listic conductors, Nature 393, 240 (1998)

    1998

  45. [53]

    Agraït, A

    N. Agraït, A. Levy Yeyati, J. M. van Ruitenbeek, Quantum properties of atomic-sized conductors, Phys. Rep. 377, 81 (2003)

    2003

  46. [54]

    Landauer, Spatial Variation of Currents and Fields Due to Localized Scatterers in Metallic Conduction, IBM J

    R. Landauer, Spatial Variation of Currents and Fields Due to Localized Scatterers in Metallic Conduction, IBM J. Res. Dev. 1, 223 (1957)

    1957

  47. [55]

    Büttiker, Y

    M. Büttiker, Y . Imry, R. Landauer, and S. Pinhas, Generalized many-channel conductance formula with application to small rings, Phys. Rev. B 31, 6207 (1985)

    1985

  48. [56]

    Meir and N

    Y . Meir and N. S. Wingreen, Landauer formula for the cur- rent through an interacting electron region, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2512 (1992)

    1992

  49. [57]

    Kumar, J

    C. Kumar, J. Birkbeck, J. A. Sulpizio, D. J. Perello, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, O. Reuven, T. Scaffidi, A. Stern, A. K. Geim, and S. Ilani, Imaging hydrodynamic electrons flowing without Landauer-Sharvin resistance, Nature609, 276 (2022)

    2022

  50. [58]

    Y . Cao, V . Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y . Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Correlated in- sulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene su- perlattices, Nature 556, 80 (2018)

    2018

  51. [59]

    Y . Cao, V . Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional superconduc- tivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature 556, 43 (2018)

    2018

  52. [60]

    Fidrysiak, M

    M. Fidrysiak, M. Zegrodnik, and J. Spałek, Unconventional topological superconductivity and phase diagram for an effec- tive two-orbital model as applied to twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 98, 085436 (2018)

    2018

  53. [61]

    Y . V . Nazarov and Y . M. Blanter,Quantum Transport: Intro- duction to Nanoscience (Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, UK, 2009); Chapter 1

    2009

  54. [62]

    Ya. M. Blanter and I. Martin, Transport through normal-metal- graphene contacts, Phys. Rev. B 76, 155433 (2007)

    2007

  55. [63]

    J. P. Robinson and H. Schomerus, Electronic transport in normal-conductor/graphene/normal-conductor junctions and conditions for insulating behavior at a finite charge-carrier density, Phys. Rev. B76, 115430 (2007)

    2007

  56. [64]

    Strictly speaking, these solutions take the form of linear com- binations of two plane waves (with positive and negative ky), producing standing waves in the y direction, but this detail is 23 irrelevant to the calculations presented below

  57. [65]

    E. C. Kemble, A Contribution to the Theory of the B. W. K. Method, Phys. Rev. 48, 549 (1935)

    1935

  58. [66]

    Das Sarma, S

    S. Das Sarma, S. Adam, E. H. Hwang, and E. Rossi, Electronic transport in two dimensional graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 407 (2011)

    2011

  59. [67]

    Koshino and T

    M. Koshino and T. Ando, Electronic Properties of Monolayer and Multilayer Graphene, in Physics of Graphene. NanoScience and Technology , edited by H. Aoki and M. S. Dresselhaus (Springer, Cham, Switzerland 2014); pp. 173–211. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02633-6_6

    2014 doi

  60. [68]

    Takimoto, S

    N. Takimoto, S. Yamamura, and K. Funayama, Generation of Non-Equilibrium 1/f Temperature Noise, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.62, 3077 (1993)

    1993

  61. [69]

    Schönhammer, Full counting statistics for noninteracting fermions: Exact results and the Levitov-Lesovik formula, Phys

    K. Schönhammer, Full counting statistics for noninteracting fermions: Exact results and the Levitov-Lesovik formula, Phys. Rev. B 75, 205329 (2007)

    2007

  62. [70]

    (20) is used for the K-valley neigh- borhood in the dispersion relation; for theK ′-valley the matrix σy should be replaced by σ⋆ y = −σy

    It should be noted that Eq. (20) is used for the K-valley neigh- borhood in the dispersion relation; for theK ′-valley the matrix σy should be replaced by σ⋆ y = −σy

  63. [71]

    M. V . Berry and R. J. Mondragon, Neutrino billiards: time- reversal symmetry-breaking without magnetic fields, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 412, 53 (1987)

    1987

  64. [72]

    T. R. Robinson, On Klein tunneling in graphene, Am. J. Phys. 80, 141 (2012)

    2012

  65. [73]

    Gutiérrez, L

    C. Gutiérrez, L. Brown, C. J. Kim, J. Park, and A. N. Pasupa- thy, Klein tunnelling and electron trapping in nanometre-scale graphene quantum dots, Nat. Phys. 12, 1069 (2016)

    2016

  66. [74]

    To obtain the current density operator, in the Hamiltonian operator on the left side of Eq

    Similar to the Schrödinger equation case, the wave function matching conditions are a consequence of charge conserva- tion. To obtain the current density operator, in the Hamiltonian operator on the left side of Eq. (20), H = vF p · σ + V (x), we substitute p → p + eA, and the...

  67. [75]

    Datta, Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 1997); Chapter 3

    S. Datta, Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 1997); Chapter 3

    1997

  68. [76]

    Schuessler, P

    A. Schuessler, P. M. Ostrovsky, I. V . Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin, Full counting statistics in disordered graphene at Dirac point: From ballistics to diffusion, Phys. Rev. B 82, 085419 (2010)

    2010

  69. [77]

    I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, Seventh Edition (Academic Press, New York, 2007); Eq. 2.553.3

    2007

  70. [78]

    F. Miao, S. Wijeratne, Y . Zhang, U. C. Coscun, W. Bao, C. N. Lau, Phase Coherent Transport in Graphene Quantum Bil- liards, Science 317, 1530 (2007)

    2007

  71. [79]

    Abramowitz and I

    M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, eds., Handbook of Math- ematical Functions (Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1965); Chapter 15

    1965

  72. [80]

    W. J. Chan, L. K. Ang, and Y . S. Ang, Quantum transport and shot noise in two-dimensional semi-Dirac system, Appl. Phys. Lett. 122, 163102 (2023)

    2023

  73. [81]

    DiCarlo, J

    L. DiCarlo, J. R. Williams, Y . Zhang, D. T. McClure, C. M. Marcus, Shot Noise in Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 156801 (2008)

    2008

  74. [82]

    E. Onac, F. Balestro, B. Trauzettel, C. F. J. Lodewijk, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Shot-Noise Detection in a Carbon Nanotube Quantum Dot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 026803 (2006)

    2006

  75. [83]

    M. I. Katsnelson and F. Guinea, Transport through evanescent waves in ballistic graphene quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 78, 075417 (2008)

    2008

  76. [84]

    Rycerz and D

    A. Rycerz and D. Suszalski, Graphene disk in a solenoid mag- netic potential: Aharonov-Bohm effect without a two-slit-like setup, Phys. Rev. B 101, 245429 (2020)

    2020

  77. [85]

    C. W. J. Beenakker and M. Büttiker, Suppression of shot noise in metallic diffusive conductors, Phys. Rev. B 46, 1889(R) (1992)

    1992

  78. [86]

    K. E. Nagaev, On the shot noise in dirty metal contacts, Phys. Lett. A 169, 103 (1992)

    1992

  79. [87]

    C. W. J. Beenakker, Random-matrix theory of quantum trans- port, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 731 (1997)

    1997

  80. [88]

    Giovannetti, P

    G. Giovannetti, P. A. Khomyakov, G. Brocks, V . M. Karpan, J. van den Brink, and P. J. Kelly, Doping Graphene with Metal Contacts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 026803 (2008)

    2008

  81. [89]

    Cusati, G

    T. Cusati, G. Fiori, A. Gahoi, V . Passi, M. C. Lemme, A. For- tunelli, and G. Iannaccone, Electrical properties of graphene- metal contacts, Sci. Rep. 7, 5109 (2017)

    2017

  82. [90]

    L. M. Martelo, M. Dzierzawa, L. Siffert, and D. Baeriswyl, Mott-Hubbard transition and antiferromagnetism on the hon- eycomb lattice, Z. Phys. B 103, 335 (1997)

    1997

  83. [91]

    Sorella, Y

    S. Sorella, Y . Otsuka, and S. Yunoki, Absence of a Spin Liquid Phase in the Hubbard Model on the Honeycomb Lattice, Sci. Rep. 2, 992 (2012)

    2012

  84. [92]

    Schüler, M

    M. Schüler, M. Rösner, T. O. Wehling, A. I. Lichtenstein, and M. I. Katsnelson, Optimal Hubbard models for materials with nonlocal Coulomb interactions: graphene, silicene and ben- zene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 036601 (2013)

    2013

  85. [93]

    D. A. Rowlands and Y .-Z. Zhang, Disappearance of the Dirac cone in silicene due to the presence of an electric field, Chin. Phys. B 23, 037101 (2014)

    2014

  86. [94]

    H.-K. Tang, E. Laksono, J. N. B. Rodrigues, P. Sengupta, F. F. Assaad, and S. Adam, Interaction-Driven Metal-Insulator Transition in Strained Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 186602 (2015)

    2015

  87. [95]

    G. Rut, M. Fidrysiak, D. Goc-Jagło, and A. Rycerz, Mott Transition in the Hubbard Model on Anisotropic Honeycomb Lattice with Implications for Strained Graphene: Gutzwiller Variational Study, Int. J. Mol. Sci.24, 1509 (2023)

    2023

  88. [96]

    Potasz, A

    P. Potasz, A. D. Güçlü, A. Wójs, and P. Hawrylak, Electronic properties of gated triangular graphene quantum dots: Mag- netism, correlations, and geometrical effects, Phys. Rev. B85, 075431 (2012)

    2012

  89. [97]

    Rosenzweig, H

    P. Rosenzweig, H. Karakachian, D. Marchenko, K. Küster, and U. Starke, Overdoping Graphene beyond the van Hove Singularity, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 176403 (2020)

    2020

  90. [98]

    Fabian, L

    T. Fabian, L. Walzek, J. Burgdörfer, F. Libisch, and G. Dat- seris, Particlelike valleytronics in graphene, Phys. Rev. B106, 125419 (2022)

    2022

  91. [99]

    K. J. U. Vidarte, and C. Lewenkopf, High-energy Landau lev- els in graphene beyond nearest-neighbor hopping processes: Corrections to the effective Dirac Hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. B 106, 155414 (2022)

    2022

  92. [100]

    Rycerz, J

    A. Rycerz, J. Tworzydło, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Valley filter and valley valve in graphene, Nat. Phys. 3, 172 (2007)

    2007

  93. [101]

    Wimmer, ˙I

    M. Wimmer, ˙I. Adagideli, S. Berber, D. Tománek, and K. Richter, Spin Currents in Rough Graphene Nanoribbons: Uni- versal Fluctuations and Spin Injection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 177207 (2008)

    2008

  94. [102]

    M. M. Gruji ´c, M. Ž. Tadi ´c, and F. M. Peeters, Spin-Valley Filtering in Strained Graphene Structures with Artificially In- duced Carrier Mass and Spin-Orbit Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 046601 (2014)

    2014

  95. [103]

    W. Bao, G. Liu, Z. Zhao, H. Zhang, D. Yan, A. Deshpande, B. J. LeRoy, and C. N. Lau, Lithography-free Fabrication of 24 High Quality Substrate-supported and Freestanding Graphene devices, Nano Res. 3, 98 (2010)

    2010

  96. [104]

    Ando, Quantum point contacts in magnetic fields, Phys

    T. Ando, Quantum point contacts in magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B 44, 8017 (1991)

    1991

  97. [105]

    It can be further approximated as Napprox = 2KW infty/π with K = |E + V∞|/ℏvF , giving Napprox ≃ 130 for E = 0 and V∞ = t0/2; the actual number of propagating modes N (∞) open ⩾ Napprox (if |E + V∞| ≲ t0) due to the trigonal warping

  98. [106]

    Wakabayashi and T

    K. Wakabayashi and T. Aoki, Electrical conductance of zigzag nanographite ribbons with locally applied gate voltage, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 16, 4897 (2002)

    2002

  99. [107]

    Wakabayashi, K

    K. Wakabayashi, K. Sasaki, T. Nakanishi, and T. Enoki, Elec- tronic states of graphene nanoribbons and analytical solutions, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater.11 054504 (2010)

    2010

  100. [108]

    Schelter, P

    J. Schelter, P. Recher, and B. Trauzettel, The Aharonov-Bohm effect in graphene rings, Solid State Comm.152, 1411 (2012)

    2012

  101. [109]

    Hung Nguyen, Y

    V . Hung Nguyen, Y . M. Niquet, and P. Dollfus, Aharonov- Bohm effect and giant magnetoresistance in graphene nanorib- bon rings, Phys. Rev. B 88, 035408 (2013)

    2013

  102. [110]

    Z. Tang, S. Chen, C. I. Osuala, A. S. Sarkar, G. Hader, A. Cummings, S. Strauf, C. Qu, and E.-H. Yang, Observations of Aharonov-Bohm Conductance Oscillations in CVD-Grown Graphene Rings at 4K, IEEE Open J. Nanotech.4, 208 (2023)

    2023

  103. [111]

    Ezawa, Monolayer Topological Insulators: Silicene, Ger- manene, and Stanene, J

    M. Ezawa, Monolayer Topological Insulators: Silicene, Ger- manene, and Stanene, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 84, 121003 (2015)

    2015

  104. [112]

    Hartman and Z

    T. Hartman and Z. Sofer, Beyond Graphene: Chemistry of Group 14 Graphene Analogues: Silicene, Germanene, and Stanene, ACS Nano 13, 8566 (2019)

    2019

  105. [113]

    Cserti, Minimal longitudinal dc conductivity of perfect bi- layer graphene, Phys

    J. Cserti, Minimal longitudinal dc conductivity of perfect bi- layer graphene, Phys. Rev. B, 75, 033405 (2007)

    2007

  106. [114]

    Suszalski, G

    D. Suszalski, G. Rut, and A. Rycerz, Conductivity scaling and the effects of symmetry-breaking terms in bilayer graphene Hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. B, 101, 125425 (2020)

    2020

  107. [115]

    Kashiwaya, Y

    S. Kashiwaya, Y . Shi, J. Lu, D. G. Sangiovanni, G. Greczyn- ski, M. Magnuson, M. Andersson, J. Rosen, and L. Hultman, Synthesis of goldene comprising single-atom layer gold, Nat. Synth. 3, 744 (2024)

    2024

  108. [116]

    Anderson, Z

    E. Anderson, Z. Bai, C. Bischof, S. Blackford, J. Demmel, J. Dongarra, J. D. Croz, A. Greenbaum, S. Hammarling, A. McKenney,et al., LAPACK Users’ Guide, Third Edition (Soci- ety for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1999)

    1999

  109. [117]

    C. H. Lewenkopf, E. R. Mucciolo, The recursive Green’s func- tion method for graphene, J. Comput. Eletron. 12, 203 (2013)

    2013

  110. [118]

    C. W. Groth, M. Wimmer, A. R. Akhmerov, and X. Wain- tal, Kwant: a software package for quantum transport, New J. Phys. 16, 063065 (2014)

    2014

  111. [119]

    S. M. João, M. An ¯delkovi´c, L. Covaci, T. G. Rappoport, J. M. V . P. Lopes, and A. Ferreira, KITE: high-performance accurate modelling of electronic structure and response func- tions of large molecules, disordered crystals and heterostruc- tures, R. Soc. Open Sci. 7, 191809 (2020)

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.