Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 101 references

InAs/InP quantum dot based C-Band all-fiber plug-and-play triggered single-photon source integrated using micro-transfer printing

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports a triggered all-fiber single-photon source at the telecom C-band, with an InAs/InP quantum dot cavity micro-transfer printed onto a standard fiber core, showing $g^{(2)}(0)=0.14(14)$ after background correction.

desk verdict Useful C-band all-fiber QD integration demonstration, but the headline g2 correction doesn't reproduce from the paper's own equation. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16490 v1 pith:55PYTA7B submitted 2024-11-25 physics.optics quant-ph

Marek G. Mikulicz , Pawe{l} Mrowiński , Pawe{l} Holewa , Kresten Yvind , Marcin Syperek , Elizaveta Semenova This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsquant-ph
keywords single-photonsourcetelecomC-bandInAs/InPquantumdotsphotoniccrystalcavitymicro-transferprintingfiber-coupledHanburyBrown-Twisssecond-ordercorrelation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a triggered single-photon source that couples directly into a standard single-mode telecom fiber and operates in the C-band around 1550 nm, the wavelength range used by long-haul fiber networks. The device is an InAs/InP quantum dot embedded in an H1 photonic crystal cavity, picked up and placed onto a cleaved SMF-28 fiber core with micro-transfer printing, and cooled to 15 K in a compact cryocooler. The authors measure a second-order correlation $g^{(2)}_{\mathrm{fit}}(0)=0.27(12)$ and, after correcting for background emission, $g^{(2)}_{\mathrm{corrected}}(0)=0.14(14)$, with output intensity stable to a standard deviation of 0.13 over 40 hours. If correct, this is a robust plug-and-play all-fiber single-photon source for quantum communication in the third telecom window.

What carries the argument

The central object is an H1 point-defect 2D photonic crystal cavity etched into an InP membrane containing high-density InAs/InP quantum dots. FDTD simulations design the cavity to have a fundamental mode near 1550 nm with a Purcell factor of about 50 and a calculated transmission of roughly 27% of the dipole field into the fiber core mode. A PDMS stamp lifts the pre-selected cavity from the source wafer and places it directly on a cleaved Corning SMF-28 fiber core (8.2 µm diameter), where it is held by van der Waals adhesion, with placement precision better than 200 nm. The single-photon statistics are analyzed with a pulsed Hanbury Brown-Twiss setup, fitting the histogram with Eq. (1) and then applying the background-correction formula $g^{(2)}_{\mathrm{corrected}}(0) = [C_N(\tau) - (1-\rho^2)]/\rho^2$ with $\rho = S/(S+B)$, where $S$ and $B$ are the signal and background count rates.

What would settle it

Re-measure $g^{(2)}(0)$ on the same 1532 nm line while scanning the fiber filter across the line in small steps; if the raw coincidence dip changes when a second emitter enters the window, the single-emitter assumption is false. Or record the raw $g^{(2)}_{\mathrm{fit}}(0)$ as a function of excitation power and check whether the constant-$\rho=0.7$ background model reproduces the trend; a clear mismatch would falsify the correction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a single quantum dot transition, filtered at 1532 nm, emits triggered single photons after its host photonic crystal cavity is integrated directly onto the end of a standard optical fiber. The integration uses micro-transfer printing of an H1 point-defect 2D photonic crystal cavity, with a metallic back reflector and SiO2 spacer directing emission toward the fiber core, and the full assembly operates in a closed-cycle cryocooler at 15 K. The measured autocorrelation is $g^{(2)}_{\mathrm{fit}}(0)=0.27(12)$; after subtracting the uncorrelated background contribution with Eq. (2) using a signal-to-background ratio $\rho=0.7$, the corrected value is $g^{(2)}_{\mathrm{corrected}}(0)=0.14(14)$, which the authors take as evidence of single-photon emission. The source also shows stable intensity over 40 hours, including across cryocooler thermal cycles, and was used to test a fiber link between two laboratory nodes.

Load-bearing premise

The single-photon claim assumes that the filtered 1532 nm window contains one dominant quantum dot transition and that all extra zero-delay coincidences come from uncorrelated background with a fixed signal-to-background ratio of 0.7, so the corrected $g^{(2)}(0)=0.14$ is a valid purity measure.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim holds, quantum key distribution and other quantum communication protocols can use a compact, fiber-pigtailed single-photon source at the telecom C-band with no free-space alignment.
  • The micro-transfer printing route works with high yield (20 of 21 transferred devices), so many pre-characterized cavities can be integrated onto fiber cores in parallel.
  • The source remains stable over 40 hours and through cryocooler thermal cycles, which is what a field-deployed quantum channel would need.
  • The demonstrated all-fiber link between two laboratory nodes shows the source can be plugged into existing single-mode fiber infrastructure.
  • Reducing quantum dot density or using quasi-resonant excitation should lower the background and move the raw $g^{(2)}(0)$ closer to zero, improving purity further.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A decisive next experiment would re-measure $g^{(2)}(0)$ under quasi-resonant or resonant excitation: the paper predicts less background, and a raw value below 0.1 without a correction model would settle the single-photon claim.
  • The background-correction model assumes constant $\rho=0.7$ and uncorrelated background; a power-dependence series of the raw $g^{(2)}(0)$ that cannot be explained by this model would cast doubt on the corrected value.
  • The same transfer-printing platform could attach cavities to multiple cores of a multicore fiber or to other fiber types, turning one coupon into a multichannel fiber-coupled source.
  • The 27% simulated coupling efficiency and Purcell factor of about 50 should be checked by a direct absolute brightness measurement, which would quantify how much of the emitted light enters the fiber.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper reports the design, fabrication, and optical characterization of a fiber-integrated, triggered single-photon source for the telecom C-band. An InAs/InP quantum dot (QD) sample in an H1 photonic-crystal cavity is micro-transfer-printed onto the cleaved core of a standard SMF-28 fiber, mounted in a compact closed-cycle cryocooler, and operated at 15 K. Under pulsed (40 MHz) non-resonant excitation, the second-order autocorrelation histogram yields a fitted g2(0)=0.27(12), which the authors correct for uncorrelated background using a signal-to-background ratio of rho=0.7 to obtain g2_corrected(0)=0.14(14). The source intensity is reported stable over 40 hours (sigma=0.13), and a fiber link between two laboratory nodes over an open area was established and used to test the quantum channel. The central claims are (i) demonstration of a plug-and-play all-fiber C-band single-photon source, (ii) robust integration via micro-transfer printing with high yield (20/21 structures), and (iii) practical stability suitable for quantum communication applications.

Significance. If the claims hold, this is a valuable engineering demonstration: a deterministic micro-transfer-printed QD source directly coupled to a standard telecom fiber, operating in a compact cryocooler with 40-hour stability and demonstrated operation across a real inter-laboratory fiber link. The 20/21 transfer yield and the plug-and-play architecture are practical advances for quantum key distribution and network testbeds. However, the central single-photon purity claim currently rests on a background-correction step that is not reproducible from the reported numbers, and on the unverified assumption that the 0.4 nm filtered window contains a single QD transition. These issues are load-bearing for the headline g2(0)=0.14(14), so the manuscript needs revision before the claimed single-photon purity can be assessed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III B, Eq. (2) and Fig. 5(a)] The reported corrected value g2_corrected(0)=0.14(14) is not reproducible from the stated inputs. Substituting g2_fit(0)=0.27 and rho=0.7 into Eq. (2) as written gives (0.27 - (1 - 0.7^2))/0.7^2 = -0.49, not 0.14. The quantity CN(tau) is defined as the measured normalized coincidences for a Poissonian source of the same intensity, but its value at zero delay is never reported, and the text states that the histogram already had Cbg subtracted before the fit. It is therefore unclear whether Eq. (2) is applied to the raw or to the already background-subtracted histogram, and whether CN(0) is the fitted g2_fit(0), the raw zero-delay peak area, or some other quantity. The authors must report CN(0), the value of Cbg, the measured signal and background count rates used to determine rho (with its uncertainty), and specify exactly which quantity enters Eq. (2). As written, the headline g2_corrected(0)=0.14(14) cannot be verified.
  2. [Section III B, Fig. 4(c) and Fig. 5] The single-emitter identification is not established. The text describes the low-temperature spectrum as quasi-continuous and attributes the 6.6 ns slow decay component to possible background emission, yet the autocorrelation measurement integrates a 0.4 nm Gaussian filter window around 1532 nm. In a high-density QD sample, such a window can contain more than one transition, in which case the measured and corrected g2(0) values do not characterize the single-photon purity of a single emitter. In addition, the background-correction formula Eq. (2) assumes the background is temporally uncorrelated; if the 6.6 ns component or any other background contribution is correlated with the excitation pulse, the correction is invalid. Please provide a high-resolution spectrum of the 0.4 nm window at the exact excitation conditions of the HBT measurement, quantify the number of lines and the background level within the window, and justify the assumption of uncorrelated background.
  3. [Section III B, HBT statistics paragraph] The statistical support for the single-photon claim is weaker than the headline suggests. The corrected value g2_corrected(0)=0.14(14) is consistent with zero, its upper 1-sigma bound is 0.28, and the raw fitted value 0.27(12) is only moderately below 0.5. The uncertainty propagation from g2_fit(0), Cbg, and rho to the corrected value is not described, and the sensitivity of the result to rho (reported without uncertainty) is not discussed. A quantitative statement of the confidence with which the measurement excludes g2(0) >= 0.5, together with the propagated uncertainty, would substantially strengthen the central claim.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Eq. (1)] The fit function uses the ambiguous notation exp(-|tau +/- nT|/tau_d); it should be written as a sum over exp(-|tau - nT|/tau_d) for n not equal to zero.
  2. [Abstract and Section IV] The abstract reports only the corrected g2(0)=0.14(14); the raw fitted value g2_fit(0)=0.27(12) should also be stated there so that the difference between the direct measurement and the background-corrected value is transparent to the reader.
  3. [Section III B, stability paragraph] The sentence 'The histogram of the signal distribution is shown in Fig. 5 panel b)' refers to the wrong figure; the intensity histogram appears in Fig. 6(b).
  4. [Section I, Introduction] The statement that 'all-fiber demonstrations at 1550 nm are still missing' is a strong claim that would benefit from a focused citation or a softened wording, since the distinction between fiber-coupled emitters and fully all-fiber devices is not systematically reviewed.
  5. [Section III A and Fig. 4(c)] Please clarify whether the 0.4 nm tunable filter (stated to be centered at 1550 nm in the setup description) was retuned to 1532 nm for the HBT measurement, and whether the pink shaded region in Fig. 4(c) corresponds exactly to the filtered window.
  6. [References] References [91] and [96] both cite the same Winger et al. paper; one duplicate should be removed or the citations consolidated.
  7. [Section II B and Fig. 1 caption] The sentence 'the holes' radius was set to 80 nm, 100 nm, or 120 nm' and the caption of Fig. 1(c) ('Dependence of the Purcell factor on the number of hole radius') contain wording errors; 'number of hole radius' should read 'hole radius'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the single-photon claim rests on a directly measured HBT histogram with standard, externally referenced fitting and background-correction formulas; self-citations are background/growth references and are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an experimental characterization, not a derivation from assumptions. The triggered single-photon operation is evidenced by a measured second-order autocorrelation histogram (Fig. 5a) fitted with Eq. (1), a periodic exponential model cited to Miyazawa et al. (Ref. [11]). The background-corrected value g2_corrected(0)=0.14(14) is obtained from Eq. (2), which the paper cites to Brouri et al. (Ref. [95]); rho=0.7 is obtained from measured signal and background count rates. This is the standard background-subtraction procedure, and using the same histogram for the raw fit and the correction is normal practice rather than a fitted parameter being renamed as a prediction. No quantity is defined in terms of the result it is supposed to establish. The self-citations in the manuscript (e.g., Refs. [42], [68], [79]) concern growth of InAs/InP quantum dots, deterministic localization prospects, and prior characterization methods; they are context or method references and do not carry the single-photon claim. The noted arithmetic mismatch in Eq. (2) as written with rho=0.7 and g2_fit(0)=0.27 would not yield 0.14, and the reported corrected value is not reproducible from the stated inputs; this is a reproducibility/correctness concern, not circularity. Overall, no load-bearing step reduces to its own input by construction, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is experimental, so it rests on measurement assumptions rather than derived postulates. The main dependencies are the uncorrelated-background correction, the single-transition interpretation of the 1532 nm line, and prior growth and simulation domain knowledge. No new particles, forces, or material systems are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Signal-to-background ratio rho = 0.7
    Measured S/(S+B) for the 1532 nm line, used in Eq. (2) to compute corrected g2(0)=0.14(14). If rho is overestimated, the corrected purity is inflated.
  • HBT fit parameters = g2_fit(0)=0.27(12), tau_d=2.2 ns, alpha
    Fitted to the pulsed autocorrelation histogram using Eq. (1); the corrected g2 is derived from these fitted values.
  • Background coincidence level Cbg = not quoted numerically
    In Eq. (1), the background coincidence level is subtracted before normalization, and its value affects the reported g2 and its uncertainty.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The background emission is uncorrelated with the QD emission and contributes only Poissonian coincidences.
    Invoked in Eq. (2) with rho=0.7; if background is correlated with the excitation pulse, the correction formula does not give the true single-photon purity.
  • domain assumption The 1532 nm line selected for HBT measurement is dominated by a single quantum dot transition.
    Section III B; inferred from line shape and signal-to-noise ratio, but not directly verified by, for example, an excitation power series or polarization spectroscopy.
  • domain assumption InAs/InP QDs grown at 0.93 ML with controlled V/III ratio emit in the telecom C-band.
    Taken from prior growth work, including self-cited references [68,78]; the device demonstration relies on this emission range.
  • domain assumption FDTD simulations with perfectly matched layer boundaries accurately model the fabricated H1 cavity and fiber coupling.
    Section II A; simulated Purcell factor of about 50 and transmission of about 27 percent motivate the design, though these values are not directly measured.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of InAs/InP quantum dot based C-Band all-fiber plug-and-play triggered single-photon source integrated using micro-transfer printing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/55PYTA7B

@misc{pith2026241116490,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: InAs/InP quantum dot based C-Band all-fiber plug-and-play triggered single-photon source integrated using micro-transfer printing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/55PYTA7B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16490}
}
abstract

Fiber-based long-haul quantum communication would greatly benefit from a robust and deterministically integrated source of quantum state. Here, we report the design, fabrication, and optical characterization of InAs/InP quantum dots in the InP H1 point defect 2D photonic crystal cavity, integrated with the standard single-mode fiber using a micro-transfer printing technique. The device was placed in a compact cryocooler maintaining a cryogenic temperature of 15 K with single-photon emission characterized by $g^{(2)}(0)=0.14(14)$ and reliable and stable emission (intensity fluctuations given by a standard deviation $\sigma = 0.13$), so that an all-fiber based connection between two laboratory nodes through an open area was established and utilized for testing the quantum channel. In this way, we demonstrate a plug-and-play all-fiber single-photon source operating in the third telecom window, where standard telecommunication fiber networks can be used as a low-loss medium.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.16490 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. FDTD simulations a)-b) cross-sectional electric field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Integration of the single 2D photonic microstructure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. All-fiber experimental setup with coupled single [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Optical characterization of the device. a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Time-resolved experiments a) Second-order autocor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. a) Intensity plot of the normalized single-photon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Senellart, G

    P. Senellart, G. Solomon, and A. White, Nature Nan- otechnology 12, 1026–1039 (2017)

    2017

  2. [2]

    Gschrey, A

    M. Gschrey, A. Thoma, P. Schnauber, M. Seifried, R. Schmidt, B. Wohlfeil, L. Krüger, J. H. Schulze, T. Heindel, S. Burger, F. Schmidt, A. Strittmatter, S. Rodt, and S. Reitzenstein, Nature Communications 6, 10.1038/ncomms8662 (2015)

    doi:10.1038/ncomms8662 2015

  3. [3]

    Claudon, J

    J. Claudon, J. Bleuse, N. S. Malik, M. Bazin, P. Jaffren- nou, N. Gregersen, C. Sauvan, P. Lalanne, and J.-M. Gérard, Nature Photonics4, 174 (2010)

    2010

  4. [4]

    Somaschi, V

    N. Somaschi, V. Giesz, L. D. Santis, J. C. Loredo, M. P. Almeida, G. Hornecker, S. L. Portalupi, T. Grange, C. Antón, J. Demory, C. Gómez, I. Sagnes, N. D. Lanzillotti-Kimura, A. Lemaítre, A. Auffeves, A. G. 7 White, L. Lanco, and P. Senellart, Nature Photonics 10, 340 (2016)

    2016

  5. [5]

    Lodahl, A

    P. Lodahl, A. Floris van Driel, I. S. Nikolaev, A. Ir- man, K. Overgaag, D. Vanmaekelbergh, and W. L. Vos, Nature 430, 654–657 (2004)

    2004

  6. [6]

    N. Tomm, A. Javadi, N. O. Antoniadis, D. Najer, M. C. Löbl, A. R. Korsch, R. Schott, S. R. Valentin, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, and R. J. Warburton, Nature Nan- otechnology 16, 399–403 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    Schweickert, K

    L. Schweickert, K. D. Jöns, K. D. Zeuner, S. F. Covre da Silva, H. Huang, T. Lettner, M. Reindl, J. Zichi, R. Trotta, A. Rastelli, and V. Zwiller, Applied Physics Letters 112, 10.1063/1.5020038 (2018)

    doi:10.1063/1.5020038 2018

  8. [8]

    Michler, A

    P. Michler, A. Imamoglu, A. Kiraz, C. Becher, M. Ma- son, P. Carson, G. Strouse, S. Buratto, W. Schoenfeld, and P. Petroff, physica status solidi (b)229, 399–405 (2002)

    2002

Show all 101 references
  1. [9]

    Petroff, L

    P.Michler, A.Kiraz, C.Becher, W.V.Schoenfeld, P.M. Petroff, L. Zhang, E. Hu, and A. Imamoglu, Science 290, 2282–2285 (2000)

    2000

  2. [10]

    Schweickert, K

    L. Schweickert, K. D. Jöns, K. D. Zeuner, S. F. Covre da Silva, H. Huang, T. Lettner, M. Reindl, J. Zichi, R. Trotta, A. Rastelli, and V. Zwiller, Applied Physics Letters 112, 093106 (2018), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.5020038/19756146/093106_1_online.pdf

    2018 doi

  3. [11]

    Miyazawa, K

    T. Miyazawa, K. Takemoto, Y. Nambu, S. Miki, T. Ya- mashita, H. Terai, M. Fujiwara, M. Sasaki, Y. Sakuma, M. Takatsu, T. Yamamoto, and Y. Arakawa, Applied Physics Letters 109, 132106 (2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    Santori, D

    C. Santori, D. Fattal, J. Vučković, G. S. Solomon, and Y. Yamamoto, Nature419, 594–597 (2002)

    2002

  5. [13]

    C. K. Hong, Z. Y. Ou, and L. Mandel, Physical Review Letters 59, 2044–2046 (1987)

    1987

  6. [14]

    X. Ding, Y. He, Z.-C. Duan, N. Gregersen, M.-C. Chen, S. Unsleber, S. Maier, C. Schneider, M. Kamp, S. Höfling, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Physical Review Letters 116, 10.1103/physrevlett.116.020401 (2016)

    2016 doi

  7. [15]

    Wei, Y.-M

    Y.-J. Wei, Y.-M. He, M.-C. Chen, Y.-N. Hu, Y. He, D. Wu, C. Schneider, M. Kamp, S. Höfling, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Nano Letters14, 6515 (2014)

    2014

  8. [16]

    Thoma, P

    A. Thoma, P. Schnauber, M. Gschrey, M. Seifried, J. Wolters, J.-H. Schulze, A. Strittmatter, S. Rodt, A. Carmele, A. Knorr, T. Heindel, and S. Reitzenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 033601 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    Lodahl and S

    P. Lodahl and S. Stobbe, Nanophotonics 2, 39–55 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    A. K. Ekert, Physical Review Letters67, 661 (1991)

    1991

  11. [19]

    H.-J.Briegel, W.Dür, J.I.Cirac,andP.Zoller,Physical Review Letters 81, 5932 (1998)

    1998

  12. [20]

    Gisin and R

    N. Gisin and R. Thew, Nature Photonics1, 165 (2007)

    2007

  13. [21]

    Simon, H

    C. Simon, H. de Riedmatten, M. Afzelius, N. San- gouard, H. Zbinden, and N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 190503 (2007)

    2007

  14. [22]

    Mower, Z

    J. Mower, Z. Zhang, P. Desjardins, C. Lee, J. H. Shapiro, and D. Englund, Phys. Rev. A 87, 062322 (2013)

    2013

  15. [23]

    Benson, C

    O. Benson, C. Santori, M. Pelton, and Y. Yamamoto, Physical Review Letters84, 2513 (2000)

    2000

  16. [24]

    Moreau, I

    E. Moreau, I. Robert, L. Manin, V. Thierry-Mieg, J. M. Gérard, and I. Abram, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 183601 (2001)

    2001

  17. [25]

    R. M. Stevenson, R. J. Young, P. Atkinson, K. Cooper, D.A.Ritchie,andA.J.Shields,Nature 439,179(2006)

    2006

  18. [26]

    Fischbach, A

    S. Fischbach, A. Kaganskiy, E. B. Y. Tauscher, F. Ger- icke, A. Thoma, R. Schmidt, A. Strittmatter, T. Hein- del, S. Rodt, and S. Reitzenstein, Applied Physics Let- ters 111, 10.1063/1.4991389 (2017)

    2017 doi

  19. [27]

    Bremer, C

    L. Bremer, C. Jimenez, S. Thiele, K. Weber, T. Hu- ber, S. Rodt, A. Herkommer, S. Burger, S. Höfling, H. Giessen, and S. Reitzenstein, Optics Express 30, 15913 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    Schneider, N

    P.-I. Schneider, N. Srocka, S. Rodt, L. Zschiedrich, S. Reitzenstein, and S. Burger, Optics Express26, 8479 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    Sartison, K

    M. Sartison, K. Weber, S. Thiele, L. Bremer, S. Fis- chbach, T. Herzog, S. Kolatschek, M. Jetter, S. Re- itzenstein, A. Herkommer, P. Michler, S. L. Portalupi, and H. Giessen, Light: Advanced Manufacturing2, 103 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    Bounouar, M

    S. Bounouar, M. Elouneg-Jamroz, M. d. Hertog, C. Morchutt, E. Bellet-Amalric, R. André, C. Bougerol, Y. Genuist, J.-P. Poizat, S. Tatarenko, and K. Kheng, Nano Letters 12, 2977–2981 (2012)

    2012

  23. [32]

    K. D. Jöns, L. Schweickert, M. A. M. Versteegh, D. Dalacu, P. J. Poole, A. Gulinatti, A. Giudice, V. Zwiller, and M. E. Reimer, Scientific Reports 7, 10.1038/s41598-017-01509-6 (2017)

    2017 doi

  24. [33]

    Bulgarini, M

    G. Bulgarini, M. E. Reimer, M. Bouwes Bavinck, K. D. Jöns, D. Dalacu, P. J. Poole, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, and V. Zwiller, Nano Letters14, 4102–4106 (2014)

    2014

  25. [34]

    M. J. Holmes, K. Choi, S. Kako, M. Arita, and Y. Arakawa, Nano Letters14, 982–986 (2014)

    2014

  26. [35]

    J. Wang, F. Sciarrino, A. Laing, and M. G. Thompson, Nature Photonics 14, 273 (2019)

    2019

  27. [36]

    S. E. Thomas, M. Billard, N. Coste, S. C. Wein, Priya, H. Ollivier, O. Krebs, L. Tazaïrt, A. Harouri, A. Lemaitre, I. Sagnes, C. Anton, L. Lanco, N. So- maschi, J. C. Loredo, and P. Senellart, Physical Review Letters 126, 10.1103/physrevlett.126.233601 (2021)

    2021 doi

  28. [37]

    W. H. P. Pernice, C. Xiong, C. Schuck, and H. X. Tang, Applied Physics Letters100, 10.1063/1.3690888 (2012)

    2012 doi

  29. [38]

    Schröder, M

    T. Schröder, M. Walsh, J. Zheng, S. Mouradian, L. Li, G. Malladi, H. Bakhru, M. Lu, A. Stein, M. Heuck, and D. Englund, Optical Materials Express7, 1514 (2017)

    2017

  30. [39]

    S. Ates, L. Sapienza, M. Davanco, A. Badolato, and K.Srinivasan,IEEEJournalofSelectedTopicsinQuan- tum Electronics 18, 1711–1721 (2012)

    2012

  31. [40]

    J. Liu, R. Su, Y. Wei, B. Yao, S. F. C. d. Silva, Y. Yu, J. Iles-Smith, K. Srinivasan, A. Rastelli, J. Li, and X. Wang, Nature Nanotechnology14, 586–593 (2019)

    2019

  32. [41]

    Barbiero, J

    A. Barbiero, J. Huwer, J. Skiba-Szymanska, T. Müller, R. M. Stevenson, and A. J. Shields, Optics Express30, 10919 (2022)

    2022

  33. [42]

    Holewa, D

    P. Holewa, D. A. Vajner, E. Zięba-Ostój, M. Wasiluk, B. Gaál, A. Sakanas, M. Burakowski, P. Mrowiński, B. Krajnik, M. Xiong, K. Yvind, N. Gregersen, A. Mu- siał, A.Huck, T.Heindel, M.Syperek,andE.Semenova, NatureCommunications 15,10.1038/s41467-024-47551- 7 (2024)

    2024 doi

  34. [43]

    Najer, I

    D. Najer, I. Söllner, P. Sekatski, V. Dolique, M. C. Löbl, D.Riedel, R.Schott, S.Starosielec, S.R.Valentin, A.D. Wieck, N. Sangouard, A. Ludwig, and R. J. Warburton, Nature 575, 622–627 (2019). 8

    2019

  35. [44]

    D. B. Northeast, D. Dalacu, J. F. Weber, J. Phoenix, J. Lapointe, G. C. Aers, P. J. Poole, and R. L. Williams, Scientific Reports 11, 10.1038/s41598-021- 02287-y (2021)

    2021 doi

  36. [45]

    Abudayyeh, B

    H. Abudayyeh, B. Lubotzky, A. Blake, J. Wang, S. Ma- jumder, Z.Hu, Y.Kim, H.Htoon, R.Bose, A.V.Malko, J. A. Hollingsworth, and R. Rapaport, APL Photonics 6, 10.1063/5.0034863 (2021)

    2021 doi

  37. [46]

    F. Wang, R. E. Christiansen, Y. Yu, J. Mørk, and O. Sigmund, Applied Physics Letters 113, 10.1063/1.5064468 (2018)

    2018 doi

  38. [47]

    D. A. Vajner, L. Rickert, T. Gao, K. Kaymazlar, and T. Heindel, Advanced Quantum Technologies 5, 10.1002/qute.202100116 (2022)

    2022 doi

  39. [48]

    Flamini, N

    F. Flamini, N. Spagnolo, and F. Sciarrino, Reports on Progress in Physics82, 016001 (2018)

    2018

  40. [49]

    T. E. Northup and R. Blatt, Nature Photonics 8, 356–363 (2014)

    2014

  41. [50]

    Basso Basset, F

    F. Basso Basset, F. Salusti, L. Schweickert, M. B. Rota, D. Tedeschi, S. F. Covre da Silva, E. Roccia, V. Zwiller, K. D. Jöns, A. Rastelli, and R. Trotta, npj Quantum Information 7, 10.1038/s41534-020-00356-0 (2021)

    2021 doi

  42. [51]

    T. D. Ladd, F. Jelezko, R. Laflamme, Y. Nakamura, C. Monroe, and J. L. O’Brien, Nature 464, 45–53 (2010)

    2010

  43. [52]

    Knill, R

    E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, Nature409, 46–52 (2001)

    2001

  44. [53]

    Schlehahn, L

    A. Schlehahn, L. Krüger, M. Gschrey, J.-H. Schulze, S. Rodt, A. Strittmatter, T. Heindel, and S. Re- itzenstein, Review of Scientific Instruments 86, 10.1063/1.4906548 (2015)

    2015 doi

  45. [54]

    Schlehahn, S

    A. Schlehahn, S. Fischbach, R. Schmidt, A. Kaganskiy, A. Strittmatter, S. Rodt, T. Heindel, and S. Reitzen- stein, Scientific Reports8, 10.1038/s41598-017-19049-4 (2018)

    2018 doi

  46. [55]

    Musiał, K

    A. Musiał, K. Żołnacz, N. Srocka, O. Kravets, J. Große, J. Olszewski, K. Poturaj, G. Wójcik, P. Mergo, K. Dy- bka, M. Dyrkacz, M. Dłubek, K. Lauritsen, A. Bülter, P. Schneider, L. Zschiedrich, S. Burger, S. Rodt, W. Ur- bańczyk, G. Sęk, and S. Reitzenstein, Advanced Quan- tum ...

    2020 doi

  47. [56]

    T. Gao, L. Rickert, F. Urban, J. Große, N. Srocka, S. Rodt, A. Musiał, K. Żołnacz, P. Mergo, K. Dy- bka, W. Urbańczyk, G. Sęk, S. Burger, S. Reitzen- stein, and T. Heindel, Applied Physics Reviews 9, 10.1063/5.0070966 (2022)

    2022 doi

  48. [57]

    X. Xu, I. Toft, R. T. Phillips, J. Mar, K. Hammura, and D. A. Williams, Applied Physics Letters90, 061103 (2007)

    2007

  49. [58]

    Bremer, K

    L. Bremer, K. Weber, S. Fischbach, S. Thiele, M. Schmidt, A. Kaganskiy, S. Rodt, A. Herkommer, M. Sartison, S. L. Portalupi, P. Michler, H. Giessen, and S. Reitzenstein, APL Photonics 5, 10.1063/5.0014921 (2020)

    2020 doi

  50. [59]

    C.-M. Lee, M. A. Buyukkaya, S. Aghaeimeibodi, A. Karasahin, C. J. K. Richardson, and E. Waks, Ap- plied Physics Letters114, 10.1063/1.5089907 (2019)

    2019 doi

  51. [60]

    W. B. Jeon, J. S. Moon, K. Kim, Y. Ko, C. J. K. Richardson, E. Waks, and J. Kim, Advanced Quantum Technologies 5, 10.1002/qute.202200022 (2022)

    2022 doi

  52. [61]

    J.Zhang, G.Muliuk, J.Juvert, S.Kumari, J.Goyvaerts, B. Haq, C. Op de Beeck, B. Kuyken, G. Morthier, D. Van Thourhout, R. Baets, G. Lepage, P. Verheyen, J. Van Campenhout, A. Gocalinska, J. O’Callaghan, E. Pelucchi, K. Thomas, B. Corbett, A. J. Trindade, and G. Roelkens, APL Ph...

    2019 doi

  53. [62]

    Michl, G

    J. Michl, G. Peniakov, A. Pfenning, J. Hilska, A. Chellu, A. Bader, M. Guina, S. Höfling, T. Hakkarainen, and T. Huber-Loyola, Advanced Quantum Technologies6, 10.1002/qute.202300180 (2023)

    2023 doi

  54. [63]

    Guffarth, R

    F. Guffarth, R. Heitz, A. Schliwa, O. Stier, N. N. Ledentsov, A. R. Kovsh, V. M. Ustinov, and D. Bimberg, Physical Review B 64, 10.1103/phys- revb.64.085305 (2001)

    2001 doi

  55. [64]

    Tatebayashi, M

    J. Tatebayashi, M. Nishioka, and Y. Arakawa, Applied Physics Letters 78, 3469–3471 (2001)

    2001

  56. [65]

    E. S. Semenova, R. Hostein, G. Patriarche, O. Mau- guin, L. Largeau, I. Robert-Philip, A. Beveratos, and A. Lemaître, Journal of Applied Physics 103, 10.1063/1.2927496 (2008)

    2008 doi

  57. [66]

    M. Paul, F. Olbrich, J. Höschele, S. Schreier, J. Ket- tler, S. L. Portalupi, M. Jetter, and P. Michler, Applied Physics Letters 111, 10.1063/1.4993935 (2017)

    2017 doi

  58. [67]

    S. L. Portalupi, M. Jetter, and P. Michler, Semiconduc- tor Science and Technology34, 053001 (2019)

    2019

  59. [68]

    Berdnikov, P

    Y. Berdnikov, P. Holewa, S. Kadkhodazadeh, J. M. Śmigiel, A. Sakanas, A. Frackowiak, K. Yvind, M. Syperek, and E. Semenova, Scientific Reports 14, 10.1038/s41598-024-70451-1 (2024)

    2024 doi

  60. [69]

    M. H. Rahaman, S. Harper, C.-M. Lee, K.-Y. Kim, M. A. Buyukkaya, V. J. Patel, S. D. Hawkins, J.-H. Kim, S. Addamane, and E. Waks, ACS Photonics11, 2738–2744 (2024)

    2024

  61. [70]

    A. Kors, J. P. Reithmaier, and M. Benyoucef, Applied Physics Letters 112, 10.1063/1.5023184 (2018)

    2018 doi

  62. [71]

    Gyger, K

    S. Gyger, K. D. Zeuner, T. Lettner, S. Bensoussan, M. Carlnäs, L. Ekemar, L. Schweickert, C. R. Hedlund, M. Hammar, T. Nilsson, J. Almlöf, S. Steinhauer, G. V. Llosera, and V. Zwiller, Applied Physics Letters121, 10.1063/5.0112939 (2022)

    2022 doi

  63. [72]

    Takemoto, Y

    K. Takemoto, Y. Nambu, T. Miyazawa, Y. Sakuma, T. Yamamoto, S. Yorozu, and Y. Arakawa, Scientific Reports 5, 10.1038/srep14383 (2015)

    2015 doi

  64. [73]

    S. E. Thomas, L. Wagner, R. Joos, R. Sittig, C. Nawrath, P. Burdekin, I. M. de Buy Wenniger, M. J. Rasiah, T. Huber-Loyola, S. Sagona-Stophel, S. Höfling, M. Jetter, P. Michler, I. A. Walmsley, S. L. Portalupi, and P. M. Ledingham, Science Advances10, 10.1126/sciadv.adi7346 (2024)

    2024 doi

  65. [74]

    Saldutti, M

    M. Saldutti, M. Xiong, E. Dimopoulos, Y. Yu, M. Gioannini, and J. Mørk, Nanomaterials 11, 3030 (2021)

    2021

  66. [75]

    C. L. Phillips, A. J. Brash, M. Godsland, N. J. Martin, A. Foster, A. Tomlinson, R. Dost, N. Babazadeh, E. M. Sala, L. Wilson, J. Heffernan, M. S. Skolnick, and A. M. Fox, Scientific Reports14, 10.1038/s41598-024-55024-6 (2024)

    2024 doi

  67. [76]

    Lumerical Solutions, Lumerical solutions, inc.,https: //www.ansys.com/products/optics/fdtd (2024), ac- cessed: 2024-10-01

    I. Lumerical Solutions, Lumerical solutions, inc.,https: //www.ansys.com/products/optics/fdtd (2024), ac- cessed: 2024-10-01

    2024

  68. [77]

    Bérenger, Perfectly Matched Layer (PML) for Computational Electromagnetics (Springer Interna- tional Publishing, 2007)

    J.-P. Bérenger, Perfectly Matched Layer (PML) for Computational Electromagnetics (Springer Interna- tional Publishing, 2007)

    2007

  69. [78]

    Holewa, M

    P. Holewa, M. Gawełczyk, C. Ciostek, P. Wyborski, S. Kadkhodazadeh, E. Semenova, and M. Syperek, Phys. Rev. B101, 195304 (2020)

    2020

  70. [79]

    Holewa, A

    P. Holewa, A. Sakanas, U. M. Gür, P. Mrow- 9 iński, A. Huck, B.-Y. Wang, A. Musiał, K. Yvind, N. Gregersen, M. Syperek, and E. Semenova, ACS Pho- tonics 9, 2273–2279 (2022)

    2022

  71. [80]

    J. Yoon, S. Lee, D. Kang, M. A. Meitl, C. A. Bower, and J. A. Rogers, Advanced Optical Materials3, 1313–1335 (2015)

    2015

  72. [81]

    Roelkens, J

    G. Roelkens, J. Zhang, L. Bogaert, M. Billet, D. Wang, B. Pan, C. J. Kruckel, E. Soltanian, D. Maes, T. Vanackere, T. Vandekerckhove, S. Cuyvers, J. De Witte, I. L. Lufungula, X. Guo, H. Li, S. Qin, G. Muliuk, S. Uvin, B. Haq, C. Op de Beeck, J. Goy- vaerts, G. Lepage, P. Verh...

    2023

  73. [82]

    Menard, K

    E. Menard, K. J. Lee, D.-Y. Khang, R. G. Nuzzo, and J. A. Rogers, Applied Physics Letters 84, 5398–5400 (2004)

    2004

  74. [83]

    M. A. Meitl, Z.-T. Zhu, V. Kumar, K. J. Lee, X. Feng, Y. Y. Huang, I. Adesida, R. G. Nuzzo, and J. A. Rogers, Nature Materials 5, 33–38 (2005)

    2005

  75. [84]

    O’Callaghan, R

    J. O’Callaghan, R. Loi, E. E. Mura, B. Roycroft, A. J. Trindade, K. Thomas, A. Gocalinska, E. Pelucchi, J. Zhang, G. Roelkens, C. A. Bower, and B. Corbett, Optical Materials Express7, 4408 (2017)

    2017

  76. [85]

    Niklaus, G

    F. Niklaus, G. Stemme, J. Q. Lu, and R. J. Gutmann, Journal of Applied Physics 99, 10.1063/1.2168512 (2006)

    2006 doi

  77. [86]

    R. Loi, J. O’Callaghan, B. Roycroft, C. Robert, A. Fe- cioru, A. J. Trindade, A. Gocalinska, E. Pelucchi, C. A. Bower, and B. Corbett, IEEE Photonics Journal8, 1–10 (2016)

    2016

  78. [87]

    Kicken, I

    H. Kicken, I. Barbu, J. Gabriels, R. van der Heijden, R. Notzel, F. Karouta, H. Salemink, and E. van der Drift, in 2008 20th International Conference on Indium Phosphide and Related Materials (IEEE, 2008)

    2008

  79. [88]

    Katsumi, Y

    R. Katsumi, Y. Ota, M. Kakuda, S. Iwamoto, and Y. Arakawa, Optica5, 691 (2018)

    2018

  80. [89]

    Lu, Y.-C

    T.-W. Lu, Y.-C. Lin, and P.-T. Lee, ACS Photonics10, 2679–2687 (2023)

    2023

  81. [90]

    Mikulicz, T

    M. Mikulicz, T. Smolka, M. Rygala, M. Badura, W. Ki- jaszek, A. Lozińska, M. Kamp, and M. Motyka, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 044001 (2024)

    2024

  82. [91]

    Winger, T

    M. Winger, T. Volz, G. Tarel, S. Portolan, A. Badolato, K. J. Hennessy, E. L. Hu, A. Beveratos, J. Finley, V. Savona, and A. Imamoğlu, Physical Review Letters 103, 10.1103/physrevlett.103.207403 (2009)

    2009 doi

  83. [92]

    W. H. Wong, E. Y. B. Pun, and K. S. Chan, Applied Physics Letters 84, 176–178 (2004)

    2004

  84. [93]

    Santori, M

    C. Santori, M. Pelton, G. Solomon, Y. Dale, and Y. Ya- mamoto, Physical Review Letters86, 1502–1505 (2001)

    2001

  85. [94]

    Brunel, B

    C. Brunel, B. Lounis, P. Tamarat, and M. Orrit, Phys- ical Review Letters83, 2722–2725 (1999)

    1999

  86. [95]

    Rosa Brouri and Alexios Beveratos and Jean-Philippe Poizat and Philippe Grangier, Opt. Lett. 25, 1294 (2000)

    2000

  87. [96]

    Winger, T

    M. Winger, T. Volz, G. Tarel, S. Portolan, A. Badolato, K. J. Hennessy, E. L. Hu, A. Beveratos, J. Finley, V. Savona, and A. Imamoğlu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 207403 (2009)

    2009

  88. [97]

    Y. A. Gharbia, G. Milton, and J. Katupitiya, inOptical Fabrication, Testing, and Metrology, edited by R. Geyl, D. Rimmer, and L. Wang (SPIE, 2004)

    2004

  89. [98]

    Picelli, A

    L. Picelli, A. van Klinken, G. Lindgren, K. D. Hakkel, F. Pagliano, N. Fiaschi, I. Sersic-Vollenbroek, P. J. van Veldhoven, R. W. van der Heijden, and A. Fiore, Ap- plied Physics Letters117, 10.1063/5.0021701 (2020)

    2020 doi

  90. [99]

    Vaiano, B

    P. Vaiano, B. Carotenuto, M. Pisco, A. Ricciardi, G. Quero, M. Consales, A. Crescitelli, E. Esposito, and A. Cusano, Laser& Photonics Reviews10, 922–961 (2016)

    2016

  91. [100]

    I. W. Jung, B. Park, J. Provine, R. T. Howe, and O. Sol- gaard, Journal of Lightwave Technology29, 1367–1374 (2011)

    2011

  92. [101]

    B. Park, I. W.Jung, J.Provine, A.Gellineau, J.Landry, R. T. Howe, and O. Solgaard, IEEE Photonics Technol- ogy Letters 26, 900–903 (2014)

    2014

  93. [102]

    E. J. Smythe, M. D. Dickey, J. Bao, G. M. Whitesides, and F. Capasso, Nano Letters9, 1132–1138 (2009)

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.