Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 114 references

Positive Definite Kernels and Random Sequences Connected to Polynomial Hypergroups

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that the main tools of weakly stationary time series—spectral representation, covariance estimation, periodogram atom detection, and linear prediction—extend to sequences whose covariances are governed by polynomial…

desk verdict Solid new results on hypergroup-indexed time series, but the paper's reliance on condition (H) silently excludes the tree hypergroups it showcases, narrowing the advertised scope. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16864 v1 pith:72NSKTR7 submitted 2024-11-25 math.FA math.STstat.TH

Volker Hösel This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.FAmath.STstat.TH MSC 43A6242C0560G2562M10
keywords polynomialhypergroupspositivedefinitekernelsPn-weaklystationarysequencespredictiontheoryLevinson-typealgorithmWienertheoremsspectralestimationorthogonalpolynomials
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper builds a bridge from classical weakly stationary time series to a wider world of nonstationary sequences whose covariance is tied to a polynomial hypergroup. The author's aim is to show that the essential statistical toolkit—spectral representation, covariance estimation, periodogram detection of spectral atoms, and linear prediction—survives the move from group translation to hypergroup convolution. The central assertion is a clean predictive criterion: under a Kolmogorov–Szegő condition on the underlying orthogonalization measure, a $P_n$-weakly stationary sequence is asymptotically deterministic precisely when $\sqrt{h(n)}\,\varrho_n(\mu)/2^n$ diverges, with prediction error of order $O(1/\sqrt{h(n+1)})$ when the Haar weight grows. If true, this gives practitioners consistent estimators and fast predictors for processes that merely average or radialize classical stationary ones.

What carries the argument

A polynomial hypergroup is a discrete hypergroup $\mathbb{N}_0$ whose convolution is encoded by a sequence $P_n$ of orthogonal polynomials with nonnegative linearization coefficients; the Haar weight $h(n)$ and the character space $D_s$ replace the group dual. The paper's main tool is the Bochner-type spectral representation $K(n,m)=\int P_n(x)P_m(x)\,d\mu(x)$ together with the Christoffel–Darboux kernel, which under condition (H) forces the periodogram and Wiener-type averages to see only the atoms of $\mu$. For prediction, the load-bearing identity is $\delta_n=\sigma_{n+1}(\pi)/\varrho_{n+1}(\mu)$, expressing the one-step prediction error as a ratio of leading coefficients, which couples the asymptotics of orthogonal polynomials on $[-1,1]$ (the Kolmogorov–Szegő class) to the Haar weights of the hypergroup.

What would settle it

Take any polynomial hypergroup with $h(n)\to\infty$ and orthogonalization measure $\pi$ satisfying Kolmogorov–Szegő; Theorem 21 predicts $\delta_n=O(1/\sqrt{h(n+1)})$ for every spectral measure. Computing $\delta_n$ numerically from the recurrence coefficients for a spectral measure $\mu$ that is a single atom at $x=1$ (or an absolutely continuous measure with an $L^2$ density) and finding $\delta_n\sqrt{h(n+1)}$ unbounded would refute the rate; finding a bounded-Haar hypergroup where $\mu$ satisfies Kolmogorov–Szegő yet $\delta_n\to 0$ would refute the dichotomy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the classical triad of stationarity—spectral representation, estimation, prediction—has a faithful analogue for sequences indexed by $\mathbb{N}_0$ equipped with a polynomial hypergroup convolution. A $P_n$-weakly stationary sequence has covariance $K(n,m)=\int P_n(x)P_m(x)\,d\mu(x)$, a Bochner-type representation with $\mu$ a positive measure on the compact character space $D_s$. The paper proves Wiener-type theorems (Theorems 3, 4) characterizing the absence of atoms of $\mu$ by the vanishing of averaged sums of $|K(k,0)|^2h(k)$, gives mean-square consistent covariance estimators (Theorem 14), constructs a periodogram that exposes the atoms (Theorem 17), and resolves asymptotic one-step predictability (Theorem 21) through the identity $\delta_n=\sigma_{n+1}(\pi)/\varrho_{n+1}(\mu)$.

Load-bearing premise

Condition (H), that $h(n)/\sum_{k=0}^n h(k)\to 0$, is load-bearing: without it the Christoffel–Darboux argument that makes periodograms and Wiener-type averages see only spectral atoms collapses, and the asymptotic-stationarity and detection theorems lack a proof.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the Haar weight $h(n)$ tends to infinity, Theorem 21 makes every $P_n$-weakly stationary sequence asymptotically $P_n$-deterministic, with $\delta_n=O(1/\sqrt{h(n+1)})$; no condition on the spectral measure is needed.
  • If the Haar weight is bounded (Chebyshev-type hypergroups), the sequence is asymptotically deterministic exactly when the spectral measure fails the Kolmogorov–Szegő condition.
  • The covariance estimators based on Chebyshev polynomials, including the least-square estimator $d_{T,N}^{LS}$, are mean-square consistent for real Gaussian atom-free spectra, and transform into consistent estimators for general polynomial hypergroups via connection coefficients.
  • The generalized periodogram detects exactly those atoms $(x,y)$ of the spectral measure lying in the exceptional set $S_2$; values outside that set give vanishing expectation.
  • The Levinson-type algorithm computes the best linear predictor coefficients in $O(n^2)$ steps from $2n+1$ moments, replacing the $O(n^3)$ Cholesky inversion for $P_s$-structured covariance matrices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension would be a data-driven check of condition (H): estimating normalized cumulative Haar weights from estimated covariance decay, and comparing predicted versus realized prediction errors for Chebyshev-type versus Jacobi-type hypergroups.
  • The same leading-coefficient ratio may govern $m$-step prediction errors, and the paper's explicit Chebyshev MA(1) predictor suggests that closed-form predictors exist for other polynomial systems with trigonometric representations.
  • Because the covariance estimators require Gaussianity for mean-square consistency, a natural next question is whether fourth-moment or sub-Gaussian assumptions can replace Gaussianity without losing the $O(1/N)$ rates.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a unified second-order theory for stochastic sequences indexed by polynomial hypergroups. It introduces Pn-weakly stationary, Pn-cyclostationary, Pn-harmonizable and H/M-asymptotically Pn-stationary kernels; proves Wiener-type theorems and a periodogram theorem for detecting spectral atoms; constructs mean-square consistent covariance estimators for Tn-weakly stationary Gaussian processes and transfers them to general Pn via connection coefficients; and develops a prediction theory whose centerpiece is Theorem 21, characterizing asymptotic Pn-determinism under a Kolmogorov–Szegő condition, with explicit rates and a Levinson-type O(n^2) algorithm. The main tools are the Bochner theorem for polynomial hypergroups, the Christoffel–Darboux identity, and links to orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle. The paper is largely self-contained, with explicit constants and no fitted parameters, but several advertised results are subject to condition (H) or to Gaussianity assumptions that are wider in the abstract than in the theorems.

Significance. If the technical gaps noted below are repaired, this is a substantial contribution: it provides a genuine estimation and prediction package for a class of nonstationary sequences, with explicit algorithms and rates rather than mere existence statements. The paper's strengths are its explicit character: no free parameters are fitted, the Levinson-type algorithm is concrete, and the prediction rates are stated in terms of the Haar weights h(n). The paper is also honest about some limitations, e.g. the unresolved status of C(x) in Section 2.3. However, the advertised scope is wider than what is proved: condition (H) excludes the Cartier–Dunau tree hypergroups highlighted in Section 2.5, and the consistency theorems require real Gaussian processes with atom-free spectral measures. These are correctness-relevant scope restrictions for the central estimation and prediction claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.5, eq. (1.13)] Condition (H) fails for the Cartier–Dunau tree hypergroups highlighted in Section 2.5. For q ≥ 2 the recurrence gives h(0)=1, h(n)=q^{n-1}(q+1) for n ≥ 1, so h(n)/(Σ_{k=0}^n h(k)) → (q-1)/q > 0. Theorems 4, 6 and 17 are proved under (H), so the Wiener theorems and the periodogram detection theorem do not cover this class. The paper neither states this exclusion nor proves a replacement sufficient condition. Since the abstract advertises atom detection via periodograms for polynomial hypergroups in general, this is a load-bearing gap: please either qualify the claims or supply an alternative condition under which the periodogram theorems remain valid.
  2. [§4.1.2, proof of Theorem 21] The proof of the central prediction theorem contains an apparent factor error. From p_n = √h(n) P_n one has σ_n(π) = ϱ_n(π)/√h(n), and hence δ_n = σ_{n+1}(π)/ϱ_{n+1}(µ) = ϱ_{n+1}(π)/(√h(n+1) ϱ_{n+1}(µ)). The displayed identity in the proof places √h(n+1) in the numerator rather than the denominator. In addition, eq. (4.3) defines δ_n as the squared prediction error, whereas Theorem 19(3) and the subsequent rates treat δ_n as the prediction error norm. The statement of Theorem 21 and the rate δ_n = O(1/√h(n+1)) are consistent with the norm convention, but the proof and definitions need to be reconciled. Because Theorem 21 and its rates are central, this must be corrected.
  3. [§3.1.3, Theorems 13–14 and Corollary 4] The consistency theorems assume centered real Gaussian processes and spectral measures without atoms; Corollary 4 also requires supp µ ⊆ [−1,1]. The abstract and the introductory remarks present 'consistent estimators' for Pn-weakly stationary processes without these qualifications. This is a scope restriction rather than a mathematical error, but it should be reported honestly in the abstract and at the statements of Theorems 13–14 and Corollary 4, since the advertised estimation package is narrower than the introductory text suggests.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Definition 1, eq. (1.1)] For complex-valued kernels, positive definiteness should read Σ λ_k \overline{λ_l} K(x_k,x_l) ≥ 0; as written with λ_k λ_l the condition is only the real symmetric form.
  2. [§2.3, after Definition 5] The paper candidly notes that the existence of C(x) is an open problem for general polynomial hypergroups. This is acceptable, but it should be flagged as a limitation of the M-asymptotic stationarity concept in the introduction, since otherwise the reader may assume a complete theory where a genuine open point remains.
  3. [Theorem 7] Theorem 7 is cited rather than proved, citing Rao, Leitner and Niemi. This is acceptable for an external structure theorem, but a precise statement of the external result, including the exact definition of weak harmonizability used, would improve the paper's self-containedness.
  4. [Bibliography] References [104] and [105] both list Szegő, Orthogonal Polynomials, with different years and publishers; these appear to be duplicate entries and should be reconciled.
  5. [§3.1.1, eqs. (3.2) and (3.7)] The estimators are written for real processes. If complex centered processes are intended, conjugates should appear in X_k \overline{X_{k+s}} and in the corresponding variance computations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the prediction and estimation theorems are proved from stated assumptions using external classical results; self-citations are ancillary.

full rationale

The main predictive claims are not equivalent to their inputs. Theorem 21 derives the asymptotic Pn-determinism criterion directly from the exact Hilbert-space identity δn = σ_{n+1}(π)/ρ_{n+1}(μ) together with external results on orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle (Geronimus, Szegő, Lubinsky); no fitted constants appear and the spectral measure μ is not assumed to satisfy the conclusion. Theorem 14 proves mean-square consistency of the covariance estimators using the in-paper Wiener-type Corollary 1, the Isserlis identity for Gaussian processes, and explicit coefficient bounds on the estimators; these are ordinary mathematical hypotheses, not the desired estimates. The periodogram theorem (Theorem 17) is derived from the Wiener theorem proved earlier in the paper, with condition (H) as an explicit assumption. The self-citations to the author's prior work, such as [37] in Remark 4 and [38] in Remark 13, are remarks or improvement statements and are not load-bearing for the new theorems. The paper even states, in Section 2.3, that the convergence question for C(x) is an unsolved problem in general, which shows that it does not hide an assumption behind a self-citation. The only substantive limitation is that condition (H) fails for the Cartier-Dunau tree hypergroups, which narrows the coverage of the periodogram and Wiener theorems; this is a scope or correctness concern, not a circularity. No equation is defined in terms of the quantity it predicts, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters fitted to data and no invented physical or mathematical entities. Its results depend on standard hypergroup axioms, condition (H), and the analytic assumptions listed above, all stated in the text.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Nonnegative linearization coefficients g(m,n,k) with Pn(1)=1, making N0 a polynomial hypergroup.
    Definition 3 and the Bochner representation (1.10) require this; invoked throughout Chapter 1, Section 2.
  • domain assumption Haar weights satisfy condition (H): h(n)/sum_{k=0}^n h(k) tends to 0.
    Used in Theorems 3, 4, 6, and 17; the text says this condition seems essential, and Section 2.3 notes the related C(x) limit is unsolved in general.
  • domain assumption Spectral measure mu has no atoms for mean-square consistency of covariance estimators.
    Assumed in Theorems 13 and 14 and Corollary 4; Corollary 1 connects atom-free spectral measures to vanishing covariance averages.
  • domain assumption The process is real Gaussian for the estimator consistency theorems.
    Theorem 13 uses Isserlis' identity for fourth moments; consistency for non-Gaussian processes is not established.
  • domain assumption Kolmogorov-Szego condition on the orthogonalization measure pi for the prediction dichotomy.
    Theorem 21 and Proposition 5 transfer classical OPUC results to the hypergroup setting; not all hypergroup polynomials satisfy this condition, as noted in Section 4.1.3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Positive Definite Kernels and Random Sequences Connected to Polynomial Hypergroups." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/72NSKTR7

@misc{pith2026241116864,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Positive Definite Kernels and Random Sequences Connected to Polynomial Hypergroups},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/72NSKTR7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16864}
}
read the original abstract

This work explores new classes of nonstationary stochastic sequences associated with polynomial hypergroups. Their covariance structures are analyzed through positive definite kernels and corresponding Hilbert spaces. Novel consistent estimators are introduced for deriving covariance structures from sequence realizations. A comprehensive prediction theory is developed, including a fast Levinson-type algorithm for efficiently calculating best linear predictors. Wiener-type theorems are established, enabling the detection of spectral measure atoms via generalized periodograms. Additional advancements, such as prediction with supplementary information, further enhance the scope of this study.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1984

    Andˇ el, J.: Statistische Analyse von Zeitreihen. Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1984

    1984

  2. [2]

    Arnaud, J.P.: Stationary processes indexed by a homogeneous tree. Ann. of Prob. 22 (1994), 195-218

    1994

  3. [3]

    Aronszajn, N.: Theory of reproducable kernels. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 68 (1950), 337-404

    1950

  4. [4]

    Askey R.: Orthogonal polynomials, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 18 (213), Provi- dence, 1979

    1979

  5. [5]

    SIAM, Philadelphia, 1975

    Askey R.: Orthogonal Polynomials and Special Functions. SIAM, Philadelphia, 1975

    1975

  6. [6]

    Askey R.: Orthogonal expansions with positive coefficients II, Siam J. Math. 2 (1971), 340-346

    1971

  7. [7]

    Berg, C., Christensen, J. P. R., Ressel, P.: Harmonic Analysis on Semigroups Theory of Positive Definite and Related Functions, Springer, Berlin, 1984

    1984

  8. [8]

    De Gruyter, Berlin, 1995

    Bloom, W.R., Heyer, H.: Harmonic Analysis of Probability Measures on Hyper- groups. De Gruyter, Berlin, 1995

    1995

Show all 114 references
  1. [9]

    Blower, G.: Stationary processes for translation operators. Proc. London Math. Soc. 72 (1996), 697-720

    1996

  2. [10]

    113 114 BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Bochner, S.: Vorlesung ¨ uber Fouriersche Integrale, Leipzig, 1932. 113 114 BIBLIOGRAPHY

    1932

  3. [11]

    in: Proc

    Bochner, S.: Stationarity, boundedness, almost periodicity of random valued functions. in: Proc. Third Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist. Probab. Vol. 2, Berke- ley, pp. 7-27, 1956

    1956

  4. [12]

    SIAM J.Math

    Bressoud, D.M.: Linearization and related formulas for q-ultraspherical polyno- mials. SIAM J.Math. Anal. 12 (1981), 161-168

    1981

  5. [13]

    Springer, New York, 1991

    Brockwell, P.J., Davies, R.A.: Time Series: Theory and Methods. Springer, New York, 1991

    1991

  6. [14]

    Chang, D.K., Rao, M.M.: Bimeasures and non stationary processes in Real and Stochastic Analysis, Rao, M.M., Ed., Wiley, New York, 1986

    1986

  7. [15]

    Stochastic Anal

    Chang, D.K., Rao, M.M.: Special representations of weakly harmonizable pro- cesses. Stochastic Anal. Appl. 6 (1988), 169-189

    1988

  8. [16]

    Chihara, T.S.: An Introduction to Orthogonal Polynomials, Gordon and Breach, New York, 1978

    1978

  9. [17]

    Cowling, M., Meda, St., Setti, A.G.: An overview of harmonic analysis on the group of isometries of a homogeneous tree. Expo. Math. 16 (1998), 385-424

    1998

  10. [18]

    Cram´ er, H.: On the theory of stationary random processes. Ann. Math. 41 (1940), 215-230

    1940

  11. [19]

    Cram´ er, H.: Stochastic processes as curves in Hilbert spaces. Theory. Probability Appl. 9 (1964), 193-204

    1964

  12. [20]

    Stochastic Processes Appl

    Dehay , D.: Spectral analysis of the covariance of the almost periodically corre- lated processes. Stochastic Processes Appl. 50 (1994), 315-330

    1994

  13. [21]

    Nevai (ed.), NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series C: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 294

    Delsarte, P., Genin, Y.: On the role of orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle in digital signal processing applications (115-133), in: Orthogonal polynomials, theory and practice, P. Nevai (ed.), NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series C: Mathematical and Physical Sciences...

    1990

  14. [22]

    Wi- ley, New York, 1985

    Devroye, L., Gy¨ orfi, L.: Nonparametric Density Estimation: The L1-View. Wi- ley, New York, 1985. BIBLIOGRAPHY 115

    1985

  15. [23]

    Signal Processing 86 (4) (2006), 639-697

    Gardner, W.A., Napolitano, A., Paura L.: Cyclostationarity: Half a century of research. Signal Processing 86 (4) (2006), 639-697

    2006

  16. [24]

    Gasper,G.: Linearizations of the product of Jacobi polynomials II. Canad. J. Math. 22 (1970), 582-593

    1970

  17. [25]

    Numer- ical Mathematics and Scientific Computation

    Gautschi W.: Orthogonal polynomials, computation and approximation. Numer- ical Mathematics and Scientific Computation. Oxford University Press, 2004

    2004

  18. [26]

    Genossar M.J., Lev-Ari H., Kailath T.: Consistent estimation of the cyclic au- tocorrelation, IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc. 42 (1994), 565-603

    1994

  19. [27]

    Pergamon, Oxford, 1960

    Geronimus, Y.L.: Polynomials Orthogonal on a Circle and Interval. Pergamon, Oxford, 1960

    1960

  20. [28]

    Duke Math

    Getoor, R.K.: The shift operator for non-stationary stochastic processes. Duke Math. J. 23 (1956), 175-187

    1956

  21. [29]

    Soviet Math

    Gladyshev, E.G.: Periodically correlated random sequences. Soviet Math. 2 (1961), 385-388

    1961

  22. [30]

    Theory Prob

    Gladyshev, E.G.: On multidimensional stationary random processes. Theory Prob. and Appl. 3( 1958), 425-428

    1958

  23. [31]

    Golub, G.H., van Loan C.F.: Matrix computations, 2nd edn., The John Hopkins University Press, 1989

    1989

  24. [32]

    Graham, C.C., McGehee, O.C.: Essays in Commutative Harmonic Analysis, Springer, New York, 1979

    1979

  25. [33]

    Hanin, L.G., Schreiber, B.S.: Discrete spectrum of nonstationary stochastic pro- cesses on groups. J. Theoretical Probability 11 (1998), 1111-1133

    1998

  26. [34]

    Heinig G., Rost K.: New fast algorithms for Toeplitz-plus-Hankel matrices, SIAM Journal Matrix Anal. Appl. 25(3) (2003), 842-857

    2003

  27. [35]

    Gaussian Random Fields, World Scientific, pp

    Heyer, H.: Stationary random fields over hypergroups. Gaussian Random Fields, World Scientific, pp. 197-213, 1991. 116 BIBLIOGRAPHY

    1991

  28. [36]

    Contemporary Math

    Heyer, H.: The covariance distribution of a generalized random field over a com- mutative hypergroup. Contemporary Math. AMS 261, Probability on Algebraic Structures, pp. 73-82, 2000

    2000

  29. [37]

    H¨ osel V., Lasser R.: A Wiener theorem for orthogonal polynomials, J. Funct. Anal. 133(2) (1995), 395-401

    1995

  30. [38]

    H¨ osel V., Lasser R.: One-step prediction for Pn-weakly stationary processes, Monatshefte f¨ ur Mathematik 113 (1992), 199-212

    1992

  31. [39]

    H¨ osel, V.: On the estimation of covariance functions on Pn-weakly stationary processes. Stoch. Anal. and Appl. 16 (1998), 607-629

    1998

  32. [40]

    Annals of Probability 31(1) (2003), 93-114

    H¨ osel, V., Lasser, R.: Prediction of weakly stationary sequences on polynomial hypergroups. Annals of Probability 31(1) (2003), 93-114

    2003

  33. [41]

    Hofmann, M.: Some Classes of Nonstationary Processes on Groups and Hyper- groups, Diploma thesis, TUM, 2006

    2006

  34. [42]

    Houdr´ e, C.: Harmonizability, V-boundedness, (2,p)-boundedness of stochastic processes. Probab. Theory Rel. Fields 84 (1990), 39-54

    1990

  35. [43]

    Theory Rel

    Houdr´ e, C.: Linear Fourier and stochastic analysis, Probab. Theory Rel. Fields 87 (1990), 167-188

    1990

  36. [44]

    Hurd, H.L.: Representation of strongly harmonizable periodically correlated pro- cesses and their covariances. J. Multivar. Anal. 29 (1989), 53-67

    1989

  37. [45]

    Hurd, H.L.: Correlation theory of almost periodically correlated processes. J. Multivar. Anal. 37 (1991), 24-45

    1991

  38. [46]

    Spectral theory and practice

    Hurd, H.L., Miamee, A.: Periodically correlated random sequences. Spectral theory and practice. Wiley Series in Probability and statistics, 2007

    2007

  39. [47]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005

    Ismail, M.E.H.: Classical and quantum orthogonal polynomials in one variable. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005. BIBLIOGRAPHY 117

    2005

  40. [48]

    Biometrika 12 (1918), 134-139

    Isserlis, L.: On a formula for the product-moment coefficient of any order of a normal frequency distribution in any number of variables. Biometrika 12 (1918), 134-139

    1918

  41. [49]

    Jewett, R.I.: Spaces with an abstract convolution of measures. Adv. in Math. 18 (1975), 1-101

    1975

  42. [50]

    SIAM Review 37 (1995), 297-386

    Kailath, T., Sayed A.H.: Displacement structure, theory and applications. SIAM Review 37 (1995), 297-386

    1995

  43. [51]

    Series on Multivariate Analysis 2, World Scientific Publ

    Kakihara, Y.: Multidimensional Second Order Stochastic Processes. Series on Multivariate Analysis 2, World Scientific Publ. Co., Inc., River Edge, NJ, 1997

    1997

  44. [52]

    Kallianpur, G., Mandrekar, V.: Spectral theory of stationary H-valued processes. J. Multivariate Anal. 1(1) (1971), 1-16

    1971

  45. [53]

    Mathematics Student 30 (1962), 55-67

    Kamp´ e de F´ eriet, J.: Correlation and spectrum of asymptotically stationary random functions. Mathematics Student 30 (1962), 55-67

    1962

  46. [54]

    Kamp´ e de F´ eriet, J., Frenkiel, F.N.: Correlation and spectra for nonstationary random functions. Math. Comput. 16, (1962), 1-21

    1962

  47. [55]

    Khintchine, A.Ya.: Korrelationstheorie der station¨ aren stochastischen Prozesse. Math. Ann. 109 (1934), 605-615

    1934

  48. [56]

    Springer, Berlin, 1922

    Knopp, K.: Theorie und Anwendung der unendlichen Reihen. Springer, Berlin, 1922

    1922

  49. [57]

    Kolmogorov, A.N.: Stationary sequences in Hilbert space. Bull. Moskov. Gos. Univ. Matematika 2 (1941), 1-40

    1941

  50. [58]

    Lasser, R.: A modification of stationarity for stochastic processes induced by orthogonal polynomials. H. Heyer, ed., Probability Measures on Groups IX , Lecture Notes Math. 1379, Springer, Berlin, pp. 185-191, 1989

    1989

  51. [59]

    Lasser, R.: On the modified momentum problem with solution carried by [ −1, 1]. H. Heyer, ed.,Probability Measures on Groups and related Structures, World Scientific Publications, 1995. 118 BIBLIOGRAPHY

    1995

  52. [60]

    Lasser, R.: Orthogonal polynomials and hypergroups. Rend. di. Mat. 3 (1983), 185-209

    1983

  53. [61]

    Lasser, R.: Orthogonal polynomials and hypergroups II - the symmetric case. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 341 (1994), 749-770

    1994

  54. [62]

    Lasser, R., Leitner, M.: On the estimation of the mean of weakly stationary and polynomial weakly stationary sequences J. Mult. Anal. 35 (1990), 31-47

    1990

  55. [63]

    Lasser, R., Leitner, M.: Stochastic processes indexed by hypergroups I, J. Theor. Prob. 2 (1989), 301-311

    1989

  56. [64]

    Nonparametric Statistics 3 (1993), 71-80

    Lasser, R., Obermaier, J., Strasser, W.: On the consistency of weighted orthog- onal series density estimators with respect to L1-norm. Nonparametric Statistics 3 (1993), 71-80

    1993

  57. [65]

    Lasser, R., R¨ osler, M.: Linear mean estimation of weakly stationary stochastic processes under the aspect of optimality and asymptotic optimality. Stoch. Proc. Appl. 38 (1991), 279-293

    1991

  58. [66]

    Leitner, M.: Stochastic processes indexed by hypergroups II. J. Theor. Prob. 4 (1991) 321-332

    1991

  59. [67]

    Stochastic Anal.Appl

    Leitner, M.: Hyper-weakly harmonizable processes and operator families. Stochastic Anal.Appl. 13 (1995), 471-485

    1995

  60. [68]

    Lindahl; R.J., Maserick; P.H.: Positive-definite functions on involutionsemi- groups. Duke. Math. J. 38 (1971), 771-782

    1971

  61. [69]

    Van Nostrand,Princeton, N.J., 1955

    Lo` eve, M.: Probability Theory. Van Nostrand,Princeton, N.J., 1955

    1955

  62. [70]

    Acta Appl

    Lubinsky, D.S.: A survey of general orthogonal polynomials for weights on finite and infinite intervals. Acta Appl. Math. 10 (1987), 237-296

    1987

  63. [71]

    North- Holland, Amsterdam, 1983

    Mandrekar, V., Salehi, H.: Prediction Theory and Harmonic Analysis. North- Holland, Amsterdam, 1983. BIBLIOGRAPHY 119

    1983

  64. [72]

    Marty, F., Rˆ ole de la notation de hypergroupe dans l’´ etude de groupes non ab´ eliens. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 201 (1935), 636-638

    1935

  65. [73]

    M´ at´ e, A., Nevai,P.: Bernstein’s inequality inLp for 0 < p <1 and (C, 1) bounds for orthogonal polynomials. Ann. of Math. 111 (1980), 145-154

    1980

  66. [74]

    Mercer, J.: Functions of positive and negative type, and their connection with the theory of integral equations. Proc. Royal Soc. Series A, 83 (559) (1909), 69-70

    1909

  67. [75]

    G.: Periodically correlated processes and their stationary dilations

    Miamee, A. G.: Periodically correlated processes and their stationary dilations. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 50 (1990), 1194-1199

    1990

  68. [76]

    G., Salehi H.: On the prediction of periodically correlated stochastic processes

    Miamee, A. G., Salehi H.: On the prediction of periodically correlated stochastic processes. in: Multivariate Analysis V, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp.167-179, 1980

    1980

  69. [77]

    Springer, Berlin, 1970

    Mitrinovi´ c, D.S.: Analytic Inequalities. Springer, Berlin, 1970

    1970

  70. [78]

    Memoirs Amer

    Nevai, P.: Orthogonal Polynomials. Memoirs Amer. Math. Soc. 213, Providence, R.I., 1979

    1979

  71. [79]

    Niemi, H.: On stationary dilations and the linear prediction of certain stochastic processes. Soc. Sci. Fenn. Comment. Phy.-Math. 45 (1975), 111-130

    1975

  72. [80]

    Niemi, H.: Stochastic processes as Fourier transforms of stochastic measures. Annal. Acad. Sci. Fenn. AI Math. 591 (1975), 1-47

    1975

  73. [81]

    AMS-IMS-SIAM Joint summer research conference on fast algorithms in mathematics, computer science and engineering, 2001

    Olshevsky, V., (ed.): Fast algorithms for structured matrices, theory and appli- cations. AMS-IMS-SIAM Joint summer research conference on fast algorithms in mathematics, computer science and engineering, 2001. Amer. Math. Soc., Contemp. math. 323, 2003

    2001

  74. [82]

    Y.: Structured Matrices and Polynomials

    Pan, V. Y.: Structured Matrices and Polynomials. Unified superfast algorithms. Birkh¨ auser, Boston, 2001. 120 BIBLIOGRAPHY

    2001

  75. [83]

    Lecture Notes in Mathematics 272, 1972

    Parthasarathy, K.R.: Positive-definite kernels, continuous tensor products and central limit theorems of probability theory. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 272, 1972

    1972

  76. [84]

    Parzen, E.: Spectral analysis of asymptotically stationary time series. Bull. In- ternat. Statist. Inst. 39 (1962) 87-103

    1962

  77. [85]

    Academic Press, New York, 1988

    Priestley, M.B.: Non-linear and Non-stationary Time Series Analysis. Academic Press, New York, 1988

    1988

  78. [86]

    Wiley, New York, 1986

    Rao M.M.: Real and Stochastic Analysis. Wiley, New York, 1986

    1986

  79. [87]

    In: Lecture Notes in Math

    Rao, M.M.: Bimeasures and harmonizable processes. In: Lecture Notes in Math. Vol. 1379, Probability Measures on Groups IX, ed. H.Heyer, Springer, pp.254- 298, 1989

    1989

  80. [88]

    L’Enseign

    Rao, M.M.: Harmonizable processes: structure theory. L’Enseign. Math. 28 (1982), 295-351

    1982

  81. [89]

    in: Statistical Data Analysis and Inference, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp

    Rao, M.M.: A view of harmonizable processes. in: Statistical Data Analysis and Inference, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 597-615, 1989

    1989

  82. [90]

    VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin, 1956

    Riesz, F., Sz.-Nagy, B.: Vorlesungen ¨ uber Funktionalanalysis. VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin, 1956

    1956

  83. [91]

    manuscripta math

    R¨ osler, M.: On the dual of a commutative signed hypergroup. manuscripta math. 88 (1995), 147-163

    1995

  84. [92]

    Uspekhi Mat

    Rozanov, Y.A.: Spectral theory of multidimensional stochastic random processes with discrete time. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk. XIII(2) (1958), 93-142

    1958

  85. [93]

    Birkh¨ auser, Boston, 1985

    Rosenblatt, M.: Stationary Sequences and Random Fields. Birkh¨ auser, Boston, 1985

    1985

  86. [94]

    Rozanov, Y.A.: Spectral analysis of abstract functions. Theor. Prob. Appl. 4 (1959), 271-287. BIBLIOGRAPHY 121

    1959

  87. [95]

    Third edition

    Rudin, W.: Real and Complex Analysis. Third edition. Mc Graw Hill, New York, 1983

    1983

  88. [96]

    Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1994

    Sasv´ ari, Z.: Positive Definite and Definitizable Functions. Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1994

    1994

  89. [97]

    Stochastic Pro- cesses and Functional Analysis

    Schreiber, B.S.:Asymptotically stationary and related processes. Stochastic Pro- cesses and Functional Analysis. A Volume of Recent Advances in Honor of M.M. Rao, A.C. Krinik and R.J. Swift, eds., Lect. Notes in Pure and Appl. Math. Vol. 238, pp. 363-397, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2004

    2004

  90. [98]

    Stochastic Analysis and Appl

    Schreiber, B.S.: Asymptotically stationary processes on amenable groups. Stochastic Analysis and Appl. 22 (2004), 1525-1551

    2004

  91. [99]

    Schur, I.: ¨Uber Potenzreihen, die im Innern des Einheitskreises beschr¨ ankt sind. J. Reine Angew. Math. 147 (1917), 205-232

    1917

  92. [100]

    Schuster, A.: On the investigation of hidden periodicities with application to a supposed 26-day period of meteorological phenomena.Ter. Mag. Atmos. Elect. 3 (1898), 13-41

  93. [101]

    Springer, New York, 1984

    Shiryayev, A.N.:Probability. Springer, New York, 1984

    1984

  94. [102]

    An historical survey

    Stewart J.: Positive definite functions and generalizations. An historical survey. Rocky Mountain J.Math 6(3) (1976), 409-429

    1976

  95. [103]

    Annals of Math

    Stone, M.H.: On one parameter unitary groups in Hilbert spaces. Annals of Math. 33 (1932), 643-648

    1932

  96. [104]

    Szeg¨ o, G.: Orthogonal Polynomials. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1975

    1975

  97. [105]

    Szeg¨ o, G.: Orthogonal Polynomials. Amer. Math. Soc., New York, 1959

    1959

  98. [106]

    Acta Sci

    Sz.-Nagy, B.: Transformation de l’espace de Hilbert, fonctions de type positif sur un groupe. Acta Sci. Math 15 Szeged (1954), 104-114

    1954

  99. [107]

    Sz.-Nagy, B.: Contibution en Hongrie ` a la th´ eorie spectrale des transformations lin´ eaires. Czech. Math. J. 6(2) (1956). 166-176. 122 BIBLIOGRAPHY

    1956

  100. [108]

    J.Multivar

    Voit, M.: Central limit theorems for random walks on N0 that are associated with orthogonal polynomials. J.Multivar. Anal. 34 (1990), 290-322

    1990

  101. [109]

    J.Austral

    Voit, M.: Factorization of probability measures on symmetric hypergroups. J.Austral. Math. Soc. Series A 50 (1991), 417-467

    1991

  102. [110]

    Amer.J.Math

    Wall, H.S.: Hypergroups. Amer.J.Math. 59 (1937), 77-98

    1937

  103. [111]

    Acta Mathematika, V 55, pp

    Wiener, N.: Generalized harmonic analysis. Acta Mathematika, V 55, pp. 117- 258.1930

    1930

  104. [112]

    Acta Math

    Wiener, N., Masani, P.: The prediction theory of multivariate stochastic pro- cesses, Part 1. Acta Math. 98 (1957), 111-150

    1957

  105. [113]

    Acta Math

    Wiener, N., Masani, P.: The prediction theory of multivariate stochastic pro- cesses, Part II. Acta Math. 99 (1958), 93-137

    1958

  106. [114]

    Vol.s I+II, Springer, New York, 1987

    Yaglom, A.M.: Correlation Theory of Stationary and Related Random Func- tions. Vol.s I+II, Springer, New York, 1987

    1987

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.