Post-Markovian master equation \`{a} la microscopic collisional model

K. P. Athulya; Sahil; Sibasish Ghosh; Tanmay Saha

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 78 references

Post-Markovian master equation \`{a} la microscopic collisional model

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper derives a completely positive post-Markovian master equation from a collisional model with probabilistic measurements.

desk verdict The collisional-model idea is worth a look, but the derivation has a load-bearing hole in the trace-preservation step, so the central equation is not established. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16878 v1 pith:FRMPH25V submitted 2024-11-25 quant-ph

Tanmay Saha , Sahil , K. P. Athulya , Sibasish Ghosh This is my paper · ORCID

classification quant-ph MSC 81S2281P1582C10 PACS 03.65.Yz03.65.Ta

keywords post-Markovianmasterequationcollisionalmodelmemorykernelcompletepositivitythermalizationopenquantumsystemsnon-Markoviandynamics

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a completely positive post-Markovian master equation can be derived from a standard Markovian collisional model by inserting probabilistic single-shot measurements on the environment ancillas. The derived equation, Eq. (3.12), has the form ∂ρ/∂t = ∫ dt' k(t') $e^{{Lt'}}$ E L ρ(t-t'), where the memory kernel k(t') encodes when measurements occur and E is the measurement map. Depending on k, the equation reduces to the Markovian GKSL equation or to the exact Nakajima-Zwanzig equation, so it interpolates between memoryless and fully non-Markovian dynamics. The authors solve the equation analytically, give a necessary and sufficient condition for complete positivity, and show numerically for a qubit that the post-Markovian dynamics thermalizes faster than the Markovian limit. The broader claim is that collisional models can simulate any open quantum dynamics, here realized as a post-Markovian master equation.

What carries the argument

The central object is the memory kernel function k(t',t), introduced as a probability distribution that selects which ancilla is measured in the collisional sequence. In the continuum limit it becomes a time-dependent kernel k(t'), and trace preservation is used to remove its explicit dependence on the final time t, leading to Eq. (3.12). The derivation's workhorse is the composition of the Markovian dynamical map $e^{{Lt'}}$ with the measurement map E, so that the integrand k(t')$e^{{Lt'}}$ E L ρ(t-t') describes a collision, a measurement, and a subsequent Markovian evolution. This structure is what lets the same equation interpolate between GKSL and Nakajima-Zwanzig limits.

What would settle it

Choose a non-delta kernel that depends on t but has constant integral over t', such as k(t',t) = f(t')(1 + ε sin(t') sin(t)) with ∫ f = 1, and check that Eq. (3.8) still preserves trace while ∂k/∂t is not identically zero, refuting the claim that trace preservation forces pointwise time-independence.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a derivation, from a microscopic collisional model, of a completely positive post-Markovian master equation whose memory effects are carried by a phenomenological kernel k(t'). The derivation modifies a Markovian collision sequence by performing a non-selective projective measurement on a randomly chosen ancilla; averaging over weighted choices of the measured ancilla yields Eq. (3.6), whose continuum limit is Eq. (3.8). Requiring trace preservation is then used to force k(t',t) to be independent of t, giving Eq. (3.12). The equation interpolates between the Markovian GKSL equation (k(t') = δ(t')) and the exact Nakajima-Zwanzig equation upon identifying the memory kernel superoperator as K(t') = k(t')$e^{{Lt'}}$ E L. The authors provide an analytical solution in the eigenbasis of L, a Choi-matrix condition for complete positivity, and qubit thermalization simulations showing that concentrating measurement weight at early times speeds up relaxation beyond the Markovian rate.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that trace preservation of the master equation forces the memory kernel to be independent of the endpoint time t, which is only valid if the integral's vanishing implies the integrand vanishes pointwise; that inference fails, and it also conflicts with the finite-N normalization of the kernel as a probability distribution.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The derived PMME is both analytically solvable via Laplace transform in the eigenbasis of L and numerically tractable, so it can serve as a testbed for non-Markovian open-system simulations.
Complete positivity is preserved exactly when the Choi matrix Σ_{i,j} W_{ij}(t) L_j^T ⊗ R_i is positive semidefinite, providing a checkable condition on the kernel k(t).
Choosing k(t') = δ(t') recovers Markovian GKSL dynamics, while a suitable kernel superoperator recovers the Nakajima-Zwanzig equation, so the same collisional setup can realize both extremes.
In the qubit case, post-Markovian thermalization reaches the thermal state faster than the Markovian limit, and concentrating the kernel's weight at early times gives the fastest approach.
If such dynamics are physical, the same protocol could speed up the thermalization strokes of quantum heat engines.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The trace-preservation step that forces ∂k/∂t = 0 is logically under-justified: an integral vanishing does not imply the integrand vanishes pointwise, and the probabilistic normalization condition Σ_m k(mτ,Nτ)=1 is not compatible with a non-delta kernel that is independent of the final time for all N. So Eq. (3.12) may not follow from the probabilistic measurement picture without extra assumptions
The claim that post-Markovian dynamics always thermalizes faster than Markovian may depend on the chosen measurement map E and the kernel shape; a systematic scan over kernel families could reveal regimes where thermalization is slowed instead.
Because the derivation treats E as a CPTP map, the same framework could be extended to weak or generalized measurements, possibly yielding a family of interpolating master equations parametrized by measurement strength.
The interpolation claim suggests a practical route to engineering non-Markovian effects in the lab by tuning a measurement schedule in a collisional simulator; testing this on a real platform would be a direct check.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: the idea is worth a look, but the derivation has a load-bearing hole and the paper should not be published as is.

What's actually new: the construction of a collisional model with probabilistic non-selective measurements at random times, leading to a memory kernel in the reduced dynamics. The final equation is the Shabani-Lidar PMME with an extra CPTP measurement map E, which is a legitimate extension. The analytic solution in the eigenbasis of L via Laplace transform is clean and useful. The CP condition in terms of the Choi matrix of the solution map is a restatement of Choi's theorem, but it is a practically convenient way to test kernels.

The soft spots are serious. The passage from the discrete sum (3.6) to the integro-differential equation (3.8) is asserted, with a dropped boundary term from the Leibniz derivative. The trace argument then does real damage: trace preservation only gives an integral that vanishes for each t, and they conclude the integrand vanishes pointwise. That is invalid. So the t-independence of k is unsupported. If k is t-independent, the discrete normalization sum k(m tau) = 1 cannot hold for every N for a non-delta kernel, which breaks the probabilistic reading of the weights. The Markovian limit is also wrong: inserting k(t') = delta(t') into (3.12) gives E L rho(t), not L rho(t), unless E is the identity. The interpolation claim is therefore not exactly right. The thermalization section shows one numerical example, with no error bars or rigorous rate comparison; it is suggestive but not a proof of faster thermalization.

These are internal failures, not disagreements with consensus. The paper is clearly written, and the construction is plausible enough that a corrected derivation would be a nice contribution. But as it stands, the central equation is not derived from the collisional model. I would send this to a specialist referee if the journal wants to give the authors a chance to fix the gap; otherwise, reject. My recommendation: engage with it, but only after substantial revision.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper claims to derive a completely positive post-Markovian master equation (PMME) from a Markovian collisional model by inserting probabilistic non-selective measurements on ancillas. The resulting integro-differential equation, Eq. (3.12), is said to interpolate between the Markovian GKSL equation and the exact Nakajima-Zwanzig equation. The authors provide a formal Laplace-transform solution in the eigenbasis of the Lindbladian, a necessary and sufficient complete-positivity condition via the Choi matrix, and a numerical qubit thermalization study that reports faster-than-Markovian thermalization for a Gaussian memory kernel.

Significance. If the derivation were sound, a microscopic collisional-model route to a completely positive post-Markovian master equation would be a useful contribution to the open-systems toolbox, and the analytical solution plus the Choi criterion would be helpful structural results. The paper does provide a neat formal solution framework in Eqs. (4.1)-(4.8) and a clean statement of the complete-positivity condition in Eq. (4.15). However, the central derivation from the collisional model has a load-bearing gap: the trace-preservation argument that removes the time-dependent part of the memory kernel is mathematically invalid, and the claimed limits to the Markovian and Nakajima-Zwanzig equations are not correct as stated. The thermalization claim is supported only by a single hand-picked numerical example. These issues undermine the paper's principal claims, so the significance in its current form is limited.

major comments (5)

[§3, Eq. (3.9)–(3.12)] The trace-preservation step that eliminates the second term in Eq. (3.9) is invalid. After using Tr[LX] = 0, trace preservation gives only ∫_0^t [∂k(t′,t)/∂t] Tr[e^{Lt′}Eρ(t−t′)] dt′ = 0, i.e., ∫_0^t ∂k/∂t dt′ = 0 for each t, because e^{Lt′} and E are trace-preserving and Tr[ρ(t−t′)] = 1. A vanishing integral does not imply pointwise vanishing of the integrand; for example, k(t′,t) = t′t − t²/4 + h(t′) has ∂k/∂t = t′ − t/2, whose integral over [0,t] is zero for every t while the integrand is nonzero. Therefore the conclusion k(t′,t) = k(t′) and the final PMME (3.12) are not derived.
[§3, Eq. (3.6)–(3.8)] The continuum limit leading from Eq. (3.6) to Eq. (3.8) is not shown. Subtracting the expression at N−1 from that at N changes the upper limit, the arguments k(mτ,Nτ), and the argument of ρ̃S((N−m)τ); the Leibniz boundary term is dropped without comment. As it stands, Eq. (3.8) is an additional assumption rather than a consequence of the discrete collisional model. Moreover, the discrete normalization Σ_{m=1}^N k(mτ,Nτ) = 1 in Eq. (3.6), combined with the inferred t-independence k(t′,t) = k(t′), would require Σ_{m=1}^N k(mτ) = 1 for every N, which is impossible for a non-delta kernel; hence the probabilistic interpretation of the kernel breaks down.
[§3, below Eq. (3.12)] The claimed reduction to the Markovian GKSL equation is incorrect: substituting k(t′) = δ(t′) into Eq. (3.12) gives ∂ρS/∂t = E L ρS(t), not LρS(t), unless E is the identity superoperator. Since E is the CPTP map associated with a non-selective measurement, no condition E = I is stated or proven. Thus the Markovian limit is not recovered by the delta kernel.
[§3, Eq. (3.13)] The 'reduction to the exact Nakajima-Zwanzig equation' is achieved only by defining the memory-kernel superoperator as K(t′) = k(t′)e^{Lt′}E L. This is a notational relabeling: any integro-differential equation with a memory kernel can be written in that form. It does not connect Eq. (3.12) to the microscopic projection-operator derivation of the Nakajima-Zwanzig equation, and it does not substantiate the interpolation claim made in the abstract and Section 1.
[§5, Fig. 2] The thermalization claim rests on a single numerical example with one Gaussian weight profile, one initial system state, and fixed parameters α = 0.1, β = 0.9. The fidelity curves are compared visually, with no quantitative thermalization rates, no systematic parameter scan, and no check that the chosen kernel satisfies the complete-positivity condition of Eq. (4.15). The statement that the observations hold 'for any initial states' is therefore unsupported. The numerical evidence is suggestive at best and cannot carry the general claim of accelerated thermalization.

minor comments (4)

[§3, Eqs. (3.5) and (3.7)] The measurement map is written E(τ) in Eq. (3.5) but E in Eq. (3.7); the τ-dependence of the map and its continuum limit are not discussed.
[§3, Eq. (3.2)] The pre-measurement unitary UM and the collision unitary Um(τ) are combined into A^l_m(τ) without specifying which operator is used in the completeness relation; the notation should be clarified.
[§6, Conclusion] The statement that collisional models 'can simulate any open quantum dynamics' is presented as a goal and partially endorsed, but the paper only demonstrates one particular PMME; the conclusion should be moderated to reflect the scope of the result.
[§5, Fig. 2] The figure caption does not specify the Gaussian kernel parameters (mean and variance) for the two post-Markovian scenarios, nor the number of Monte Carlo or exact-evolution runs used, which would be needed to reproduce the plot.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Claimed reduction of the PMME to the exact Nakajima-Zwanzig equation is a renaming: the memory kernel superoperator K(t') is defined to be the integrand of Eq. (3.12), so the interpolation result is true by construction rather than derived.

renaming known result [Section 3, immediately after Eq. (3.12) (interpolation/NZ-limit claim).]
"Again, by considering the form of the memory kernel superoperator as K(t′) = k(t′)e^{Lt′} ◦ E ◦ L, equation (3.12) transforms into the time-nonlocal Nakajima-Zwanzig equation, ∂ρS(t)/∂t = ∫_0^t dt′K(t′)ρS(t − t′)."

The 'reduction' to the exact Nakajima-Zwanzig equation is achieved by defining K(t′) to be exactly the integrand already present in Eq. (3.12): K(t′)=k(t′)e^{Lt′}E L. With that definition, any convolution-type integro-differential equation ∂ρ/∂t=∫K(t′)ρ(t−t′)dt′ follows by substitution; no independent content of the actual Nakajima-Zwanzig equation, namely the microscopic projection-operator expression for K, is derived or used. The claimed interpolation is therefore true by construction: Eq. (3.12) is renamed, not reduced, and the label 'exact' is transferred to the paper's own phenomenological ansatz.

full rationale

The central construction is not circular in the narrow sense: Eq. (3.12) is obtained from the collisional-model weighted average, Eq. (3.6), by an explicit (though mathematically flawed) continuum-limit procedure, with the memory kernel k appearing as a phenomenological input rather than being re-used as the output. The main derivation is therefore not a fit dressed as a prediction. The trace-preservation step, which infers ∂k/∂t=0 from the vanishing of the integral ∫∂_t k dt′, is mathematically invalid, but that is a correctness gap, not circularity. The one genuinely circular step is the claimed interpolation to the exact Nakajima-Zwanzig equation: the paper defines K(t′)=k(t′)e^{Lt′}E L and then announces that Eq. (3.12) 'transforms into' the NZ equation. This is a renaming, since any convolution integro-differential equation can be written with such a K, and the distinguishing content of the exact NZ equation—the projection-operator expression for K from a system-bath Hamiltonian—is never supplied. The Markovian limit k=δ also silently requires E=id, which is not established; this is an unjustified simplification rather than a circular identification. The only self-citation, Ref. [43], is contextual background for the thermalization comparison and is not load-bearing, so it does not raise the score on its own. Overall, the core PMME construction has independent content, but a headline claimed reduction is circular by definition, giving a partial circularity score of 5.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central equation rests on an arbitrary memory kernel k and a Markovian intermediate semigroup; the kernel is not derived from a system-bath Hamiltonian, so the 'microscopic' character is limited. The trace-preservation and normalization steps are internally inconsistent, and the numerical conclusions require hand-picked Gaussian weight parameters.

free parameters (5)

Memory kernel k(t') = Gaussian distribution with unspecified mean and variance; scenarios 'early' and 'intermediate'
Introduced phenomenologically in Eq (3.6) and (3.12); it is not derived from the collisional Hamiltonian and directly controls the non-Markovian behavior and thermalization rate.
Measurement map E = qubit demo: U_M = U(β), β = 0.9 partial swap, measurement in σx basis
The CPTP map E(τ) in Eqs (3.5) and (3.12) is chosen by hand; the general derivation leaves it arbitrary.
Lindbladian L = qubit demo: collision unitary U(α), α = 0.1 partial swap
Eq (3.12) assumes an intermediate Markovian semigroup e^{Lt} with arbitrary L; in the simulation L comes from the chosen collision unitary.
Gaussian weight parameters (mean, variance, scenario) = not specified
The thermalization conclusion in Fig. 2 depends on where the Gaussian measurement weights are concentrated; the values are not given.
Initial states for thermalization = ρS(0) = |ψ><ψ| with |ψ> = 1/√5 |0> + 2/√5 |1>; η = 3/5 |0><0| + 2/5 |1><1|
The claim that acceleration holds for any initial states is not proven; only this one instance is plotted.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption System and ancillas are initially uncorrelated and identically prepared in pure states
Eq (2.1) and Section 3; if initial correlations exist, the repeated-map structure and the measurement average in Eq (3.6) do not follow.
domain assumption Intermediate evolutions after each measurement are Markovian, Λ(t) = e^{Lt} with L a Lindbladian
Used at Eq (3.9) to pass from Eq (3.8) to Eq (3.12); all non-Markovianity is placed in the kernel k rather than in the system-bath dynamics.
ad hoc to paper The continuous-time limit of the discrete weighted average is Eq (3.8), and trace preservation forces k(t',t) = k(t')
The subtraction/limit is not shown, boundary terms are dropped, and the inference from a zero integral to a pointwise zero derivative is invalid; this is a load-bearing step.
standard math The maps e^{Lt} and E are trace preserving, and L has vanishing trace
Used in the trace-preservation calculation after Eq (3.9); true for Lindblad generators with standard conditions.
ad hoc to paper W(t) is invertible for all t, so the TCL generator exists
Section 4.1 assumes det(W) != 0 without proof; the inverse dynamical map and time-local form depend on it.
domain assumption Partial swap unitaries realize thermalization through homogenization
Section 5 relies on [35] that PSWAP is the unique qubit unitary achieving homogenization; the numerical example assumes this.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Post-Markovian master equation \`{a} la microscopic collisional model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FRMPH25V

@misc{pith2026241116878,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Post-Markovian master equation \`a la microscopic collisional model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FRMPH25V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16878}
}

read the original abstract

We derive a completely positive post-Markovian master equation (PMME) from a microscopic Markovian collisional model framework, incorporating bath memory effects via a probabilistic single-shot measurement approach. This phenomenological master equation is both analytically solvable and numerically tractable. Depending on the choice of the memory kernel function, the PMME can be reduced to the exact Nakajima-Zwanzig equation or the Markovian master equation, enabling a broad spectrum of dynamical behaviors. We also investigate thermalization using the derived equation, revealing that the post-Markovian dynamics accelerates the thermalization process, exceeding rates observed within the Markovian framework. Our approach solidifies the assertion that "collisional models can simulate any open quantum dynamics", underscoring the versatility of the models in realizing open quantum systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

[1]

Breuer and F

H.P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems , Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (2002)

work page 2002
[2]

Rivas and S.F

´A. Rivas and S.F. Huelga, Open Quantum Systems , Springer Berlin, Heidelberg (2012)

work page 2012
[3]

Alicki and K

R. Alicki and K. Lendi, Quantum Dynamical Semigroups and Applications , Vol. 717 of Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg (2007)

work page 2007
[4]

G.W. Ford, M. Kac and P. Mazur, Statistical Mechanics of Assemblies of Coupled Oscillators, Journal of Mathematical Physics 6 (1965) 504

work page 1965
[5]

Benguria and M

R. Benguria and M. Kac, Quantum langevin equation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 46 (1981) 1. – 13 –

work page 1981
[6]

Ford, J.T

G.W. Ford, J.T. Lewis and R.F. O’Connell, Quantum langevin equation , Phys. Rev. A 37 (1988) 4419

work page 1988
[7]

Kossakowski, On quantum statistical mechanics of non-hamiltonian systems , Reports on Mathematical Physics 3 (1972) 247

A. Kossakowski, On quantum statistical mechanics of non-hamiltonian systems , Reports on Mathematical Physics 3 (1972) 247

work page 1972
[8]

Gorini, A

V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski and E.C.G. Sudarshan, Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems , Journal of Mathematical Physics 17 (1976) 821

work page 1976

Show all 78 references

[9]

Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups , Communications in Mathematical Physics 48 (1976) 119

G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups , Communications in Mathematical Physics 48 (1976) 119

1976
[10]

Kraus, States, Effects, and Operations: Fundamental Notions of Quantum Theory , Vol

K. Kraus, States, Effects, and Operations: Fundamental Notions of Quantum Theory , Vol. 190 of Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg (1983)

1983
[11]

de Vega and D

I. de Vega and D. Alonso, Dynamics of non-markovian open quantum systems , Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 (2017) 015001

2017
[12]

Breuer, E.-M

H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo and B. Vacchini, Colloquium: Non-markovian dynamics in open quantum systems , Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 (2016) 021002

2016
[13]

Rivas, S.F

´A. Rivas, S.F. Huelga and M.B. Plenio, Quantum non-markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection , Reports on Progress in Physics 77 (2014) 094001

2014
[14]

Nakajima, On quantum theory of transport phenomena: Steady diffusion , Progress of Theoretical Physics 20 (1958) 948

S. Nakajima, On quantum theory of transport phenomena: Steady diffusion , Progress of Theoretical Physics 20 (1958) 948

1958
[15]

Zwanzig, Ensemble method in the theory of irreversibility , The Journal of Chemical Physics 33 (1960) 1338

R. Zwanzig, Ensemble method in the theory of irreversibility , The Journal of Chemical Physics 33 (1960) 1338

1960
[16]

Vacchini and H.-P

B. Vacchini and H.-P. Breuer, Exact master equations for the non-markovian decay of a qubit, Phys. Rev. A 81 (2010) 042103

2010
[17]

Chru´ sci´ nski and A

D. Chru´ sci´ nski and A. Kossakowski,Sufficient conditions for a memory-kernel master equation, Phys. Rev. A 94 (2016) 020103

2016
[18]

Shibata, Y

F. Shibata, Y. Takahashi and N. Hashitsume, A generalized stochastic liouville equation. non-markovian versus memoryless master equations , Journal of Statistical Physics 17 (1977) 171

1977
[19]

Chaturvedi and F

S. Chaturvedi and F. Shibata, Time-convolutionless projection operator formalism for elimination of fast variables. applications to brownian motion , Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Condensed Matter 35 (1979) 297

1979
[20]

Imamog ¯lu, Stochastic wave-function approach to non-markovian systems , Phys

A. Imamog ¯lu, Stochastic wave-function approach to non-markovian systems , Phys. Rev. A 50 (1994) 3650

1994
[21]

Royer, Reduced dynamics with initial correlations, and time-dependent environment and hamiltonians, Phys

A. Royer, Reduced dynamics with initial correlations, and time-dependent environment and hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3272

1996
[22]

Garraway, Decay of an atom coupled strongly to a reservoir , Phys

B.M. Garraway, Decay of an atom coupled strongly to a reservoir , Phys. Rev. A 55 (1997) 4636

1997
[23]

Breuer, B

H.-P. Breuer, B. Kappler and F. Petruccione, Stochastic wave-function method for non-markovian quantum master equations , Phys. Rev. A 59 (1999) 1633

1999
[24]

Strunz, L

W.T. Strunz, L. Di´ osi and N. Gisin, Open system dynamics with non-markovian quantum trajectories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 1801. – 14 –

1999
[25]

T. Yu, L. Di´ osi, N. Gisin and W.T. Strunz, Post-markov master equation for the dynamics of open quantum systems , Physics Letters A 265 (2000) 331

2000
[26]

Barnett and S

S.M. Barnett and S. Stenholm, Hazards of reservoir memory , Phys. Rev. A 64 (2001) 033808

2001
[27]

Gambetta and H.M

J. Gambetta and H.M. Wiseman, Non-markovian stochastic schr¨ odinger equations: Generalization to real-valued noise using quantum-measurement theory , Phys. Rev. A 66 (2002) 012108

2002
[28]

Daffer, K

S. Daffer, K. W´ odkiewicz, J.D. Cresser and J.K. McIver, Depolarizing channel as a completely positive map with memory , Phys. Rev. A 70 (2004) 010304

2004
[29]

Breuer, Genuine quantum trajectories for non-markovian processes , Phys

H.-P. Breuer, Genuine quantum trajectories for non-markovian processes , Phys. Rev. A 70 (2004) 012106

2004
[30]

Shabani and D.A

A. Shabani and D.A. Lidar, Completely positive post-markovian master equation via a measurement approach, Phys. Rev. A 71 (2005) 020101

2005
[31]

Dalibard, Y

J. Dalibard, Y. Castin and K. Mølmer, Wave-function approach to dissipative processes in quantum optics , Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 (1992) 580

1992
[32]

Gisin and I.C

N. Gisin and I.C. Percival, The quantum-state diffusion model applied to open systems , Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 25 (1992) 5677

1992
[33]

Gisin and I.C

N. Gisin and I.C. Percival, The quantum state diffusion picture of physical processes , Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 26 (1993) 2245

1993
[34]

Plenio and P.L

M.B. Plenio and P.L. Knight, The quantum-jump approach to dissipative dynamics in quantum optics , Rev. Mod. Phys. 70 (1998) 101

1998
[35]

Ziman, P

M. Ziman, P. ˘Stelmachovi˘ c, V. Bu˘ zek, M. Hillery, V. Scarani and N. Gisin,Diluting quantum information: An analysis of information transfer in system-reservoir interactions , Phys. Rev. A 65 (2002) 042105

2002
[36]

Scarani, M

V. Scarani, M. Ziman, P. ˘Stelmachovi˘ c, N. Gisin and V. Bu˘ zek,Thermalizing quantum machines: Dissipation and entanglement , Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 097905

2002
[37]

Ciccarello, S

F. Ciccarello, S. Lorenzo, V. Giovannetti and G.M. Palma, Quantum collision models: Open system dynamics from repeated interactions , Physics Reports 954 (2022) 1

2022
[38]

Campbell and B

S. Campbell and B. Vacchini, Collision models in open system dynamics: A versatile tool for deeper insights?, Europhys. Lett. 133 (2021) 60001

2021
[39]

Rau, Relaxation phenomena in spin and harmonic oscillator systems , Phys

J. Rau, Relaxation phenomena in spin and harmonic oscillator systems , Phys. Rev. 129 (1963) 4

1963
[40]

Brun, A simple model of quantum trajectories , American Journal of Physics 70 (2002) 719

T.A. Brun, A simple model of quantum trajectories , American Journal of Physics 70 (2002) 719

2002
[41]

Ziman, P

M. Ziman, P. ˘Stelmachovi˘ c and V. Bu˘ zek,Description of quantum dynamics of open systems based on collision-like models , Open Systems & Information Dynamics 12 (2005) 81

2005
[42]

Ziman and V

M. Ziman and V. Bu˘ zek,All (qubit) decoherences: Complete characterization and physical implementation, Phys. Rev. A 72 (2005) 022110

2005
[43]

T. Saha, A. Das and S. Ghosh, Quantum homogenization in non-markovian collisional model, New Journal of Physics 26 (2024) 023011

2024
[44]

Ciccarello, G.M

F. Ciccarello, G.M. Palma and V. Giovannetti, Collision-model-based approach to non-markovian quantum dynamics , Phys. Rev. A 87 (2013) 040103. – 15 –

2013
[45]

Ciccarello and V

F. Ciccarello and V. Giovannetti, A quantum non-markovian collision model: incoherent swap case, Physica Scripta 2013 (2013) 014010

2013
[46]

McCloskey and M

R. McCloskey and M. Paternostro, Non-markovianity and system-environment correlations in a microscopic collision model , Phys. Rev. A 89 (2014) 052120

2014
[47]

J. Jin, V. Giovannetti, R. Fazio, F. Sciarrino, P. Mataloni, A. Crespi et al., All-optical non-markovian stroboscopic quantum simulator , Phys. Rev. A 91 (2015) 012122

2015
[48]

Lorenzo, F

S. Lorenzo, F. Ciccarello and G.M. Palma, Class of exact memory-kernel master equations , Phys. Rev. A 93 (2016) 052111

2016
[49]

Kretschmer, K

S. Kretschmer, K. Luoma and W.T. Strunz, Collision model for non-markovian quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. A 94 (2016) 012106

2016
[50]

C ¸ akmak, M

B. C ¸ akmak, M. Pezzutto, M. Paternostro and¨O.E. M¨ ustecaplıo˘ glu,Non-markovianity, coherence, and system-environment correlations in a long-range collision model , Phys. Rev. A 96 (2017) 022109

2017
[51]

Ry´ abar, S.N

T. Ry´ abar, S.N. Filippov, M. Ziman and V. Bu˘ zek,Simulation of indivisible qubit channels in collision models , J. Phys. B 45 (2012) 154006

2012
[52]

Bernardes, A.R.R

N.K. Bernardes, A.R.R. Carvalho, C.H. Monken and M.F. Santos, Environmental correlations and markovian to non-markovian transitions in collisional models , Phys. Rev. A 90 (2014) 032111

2014
[53]

Bernardes, A.R.R

N.K. Bernardes, A.R.R. Carvalho, C.H. Monken and M.F. Santos, Coarse graining a non-markovian collisional model , Phys. Rev. A 90 (2017) 032117

2017
[54]

Mascarenhas and I

E. Mascarenhas and I. de Vega, Quantum critical probing and simulation of colored quantum noise, Phys. Rev. A 96 (2017) 062117

2017
[55]

Filippov, J

S.N. Filippov, J. Piilo, S. Maniscalco and M. Ziman, Divisibility of quantum dynamical maps and collision models , Phys. Rev. A 96 (2017) 032111

2017
[56]

Lorenzo, F

S. Lorenzo, F. Ciccarello and G.M. Palma, Composite quantum collision model , Phys. Rev. A 96 (2017) 032107

2017
[57]

Grimsmo, Time-delayed quantum feedback control, Phys

A.L. Grimsmo, Time-delayed quantum feedback control, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 060402

2015
[58]

Whalen, A.L

S.J. Whalen, A.L. Grimsmo and H.J. Carmichael, Open quantum systems with delayed coherent feedback, Quant. Sci. Technol. 2 (2017) 044008

2017
[59]

Vinjanampathy and J

S. Vinjanampathy and J. Anders, Quantum thermodynamics, Contemporary Physics 57 (2016) 545

2016
[60]

Binder, L.A

F. Binder, L.A. Correa, C. Gogolin, J. Anders and G. Adesso, eds., Thermodynamics in the quantum regime, Springer International Publishing (2018)

2018
[61]

Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices , Linear Algebra and its Applications 10 (1975) 285

M.-D. Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices , Linear Algebra and its Applications 10 (1975) 285

1975
[62]

Lorenzo, A

S. Lorenzo, A. Farace, F. Ciccarello, G.M. Palma and V. Giovannetti, Heat flux and quantum correlations in dissipative cascaded systems , Phys. Rev. A 91 (2015) 022121

2015
[63]

Lorenzo, R

S. Lorenzo, R. McCloskey, F. Ciccarello, M. Paternostro and G.M. Palma, Landauer’s principle in multipartite open quantum system dynamics , Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 120403

2015
[64]

Pezzutto, M

M. Pezzutto, M. Paternostro and Y. Omar, Implications of non-markovian quantum dynamics for the landauer bound , New Journal of Physics 18 (2016) 123018. – 16 –

2016
[65]

Strasberg, G

P. Strasberg, G. Schaller, T. Brandes and M. Esposito, Quantum and information thermodynamics: A unifying framework based on repeated interactions , Phys. Rev. X 7 (2017) 021003

2017
[66]

Cusumano, V

S. Cusumano, V. Cavina, M. Keck, A. De Pasquale and V. Giovannetti, Entropy production and asymptotic factorization via thermalization: A collisional model approach , Phys. Rev. A 98 (2018) 032119

2018
[67]

Rodrigues, G

F.L.S. Rodrigues, G. De Chiara, M. Paternostro and G.T. Landi, Thermodynamics of weakly coherent collisional models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 140601

2019
[68]

Pezzutto, M

M. Pezzutto, M. Paternostro and Y. Omar, An out-of-equilibrium non-markovian quantum heat engine, Quantum Science and Technology 4 (2019) 025002

2019
[69]

S. Seah, S. Nimmrichter, D. Grimmer, J.P. Santos, V. Scarani and G.T. Landi, Collisional quantum thermometry , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 180602

2019
[70]

Arısoy, S

O. Arısoy, S. Campbell and ¨O.E. M¨ ustecaplıo˘ glu,Thermalization of finite many-body systems by a collision model , Entropy 21 (2019)

2019
[71]

Molitor and G.T

O.A.D. Molitor and G.T. Landi, Stroboscopic two-stroke quantum heat engines , Phys. Rev. A 102 (2020) 042217

2020
[72]

Taranto, F

P. Taranto, F. Bakhshinezhad, P. Sch¨ uttelkopf, F. Clivaz and M. Huber,Exponential improvement for quantum cooling through finite-memory effects , Phys. Rev. Appl. 14 (2020) 054005

2020
[73]

Abah and M

O. Abah and M. Paternostro, Implications of non-markovian dynamics on information-driven engine , Journal of Physics Communications 4 (2020) 085016

2020
[74]

De Chiara and M

G. De Chiara and M. Antezza, Quantum machines powered by correlated baths , Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (2020) 033315

2020
[75]

Santos, A

J. Santos, A. Timpanaro and G. Landi, Joint fluctuation theorems for sequential heat exchange, Entropy 22 (2020)

2020
[76]

Morrone, M.A.C

D. Morrone, M.A.C. Rossi, A. Smirne and M.G. Genoni, Charging a quantum battery in a non-markovian environment: a collisional model approach , Quantum Science and Technology 8 (2023) 035007

2023
[77]

Tabanera-Bravo, J.M.R

J. Tabanera-Bravo, J.M.R. Parrondo, M. Esposito and F. Barra, Thermalization and dephasing in collisional reservoirs , Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 200402

2023
[78]

Nielsen and I.L

M.A. Nielsen and I.L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information , Cambridge University Press (2010). – 17 –

2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Breuer and F

H.P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems , Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (2002)

work page 2002

[2] [2]

Rivas and S.F

´A. Rivas and S.F. Huelga, Open Quantum Systems , Springer Berlin, Heidelberg (2012)

work page 2012

[3] [3]

Alicki and K

R. Alicki and K. Lendi, Quantum Dynamical Semigroups and Applications , Vol. 717 of Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg (2007)

work page 2007

[4] [4]

G.W. Ford, M. Kac and P. Mazur, Statistical Mechanics of Assemblies of Coupled Oscillators, Journal of Mathematical Physics 6 (1965) 504

work page 1965

[5] [5]

Benguria and M

R. Benguria and M. Kac, Quantum langevin equation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 46 (1981) 1. – 13 –

work page 1981

[6] [6]

Ford, J.T

G.W. Ford, J.T. Lewis and R.F. O’Connell, Quantum langevin equation , Phys. Rev. A 37 (1988) 4419

work page 1988

[7] [7]

Kossakowski, On quantum statistical mechanics of non-hamiltonian systems , Reports on Mathematical Physics 3 (1972) 247

A. Kossakowski, On quantum statistical mechanics of non-hamiltonian systems , Reports on Mathematical Physics 3 (1972) 247

work page 1972

[8] [8]

Gorini, A

V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski and E.C.G. Sudarshan, Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems , Journal of Mathematical Physics 17 (1976) 821

work page 1976