Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 39 references

Charge density waves and superconductivity in the electron-positive fermion gas using a simple intuitive model. Part I: The model, instabilities, and phase diagram

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that a two-gas Coulomb model of electrons and positive fermions predicts charge density waves for mass ratios above 4.97.

desk verdict A clear, honest two-fluid model that reproduces the DFT phase diagram analytically, with a robust q=0 instability and a CDW branch that rests on an openly flagged extrapolation of the local field factor at low density. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17001 v1 pith:XT7M4F7B submitted 2024-11-26 cond-mat.supr-con

Carl A. Kukkonen This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords chargedensitywaveelectron-positivefermiongaslocalfieldfactorlinearresponsetheorycompressibilityinstabilityphasediagramelectron-holeliquidsuperconductivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the three-dimensional $T=0$ electron-positive fermion gas can be described as two independent fermion gases, electrons and a heavier species of positively charged fermion, coupled only by the Coulomb interaction. Because the positive-fermion gas is the same problem as the electron gas with the mass scaled by $M/m$, all established electron-gas results can be reused, and the response functions come out as exact closed-form expressions in wave vector $q$, density $r_s$, and mass ratio $M/m$. On that basis the paper claims a universal $q=0$ instability when the combined bulk modulus (inverse compressibility) vanishes, at a density about 1.25 times the equilibrium $r_s$ for every mass ratio, and a charge density wave instability for mass ratios $M/m>4.97$, with a triple point at $M/m=4.97$. These results match density functional theory in the overlapping region, and the instability condition makes explicit that the additional screening from the positive fermions drives the finite-$q$ divergence. A reader should care because the same response functions generate the effective electron-electron interaction, so proximity to the charge density wave is claimed to enhance superconductivity, and because the model turns a previously numerical phase diagram into analytic formulas.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the static local field factor $G_+(q)$, a wave-vector-dependent correction describing how exchange and correlation modify the average field felt by a fermion; it is taken from the uniform electron gas and applied to the positive fermions at the effective density $r_{s1}=(M/m)r_s$, with the noninteracting density response (Lindhard function) scaled as $\Pi_1^0=(M/m)\Pi_2^0$. The model's quantitative content sits in how this $G_+$, together with the screening term $v\Pi_1^0/\varepsilon_{ht}$, enters the denominator $\Delta$ of the two-component response functions; when $\Delta(q,r_s,M/m)=0$, the induced densities diverge. The small-$q$ part of $G_+$ is fixed by the compressibility sum rule, so the $q=0$ instability is robust, while the charge density wave depends on the intermediate-$q$ shape of $G_+$ near $q\simeq k_F$–$2k_F$; the paper uses a form that grows like $q^2$ up to $2k_F$, and that growth, amplified by the mass ratio through the positive-fermion screening, is what produces the charge density wave.

What would settle it

A direct many-body simulation of the static response of the uniform electron gas at density parameter $r_s \gtrsim 10$ for wave vectors $0<q<2k_F$ would settle the central finite-$q$ claim: if the local field factor grows more slowly than $q^2$ before $q=2k_F$, the charge density wave condition in Eq. (14) moves to larger $q$ or vanishes. Computing the neglected electron-positive fermion correlation local field factor $G_{12}$ and checking whether the triple point at $M/m=4.97$ survives would test the phase diagram directly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the coupled Coulomb system has instabilities controlled by the determinant $\Delta = \varepsilon_{et}\varepsilon_{ht} - v^2\Pi_1^0\Pi_2^0(1-2G_{12})^2$ of the two-species linear response equations. With the electron-positive fermion correlation local field factor set to zero, $G_{12}=0$, the finite-$q$ instability condition reduces to $1 + (1 - G_{2+} - v\Pi_1^0/\varepsilon_{ht})v\Pi_2^0 = 0$, the paper's Eq. (14). The term $- v\Pi_1^0/\varepsilon_{ht}$ is the extra screening contributed by the positive fermions, and it is what makes the denominator vanish at finite wave vector, producing a charge density wave; the single-component electron gas has no such instability. Computing the zero locus for mass ratios from 1 to 290, the paper finds that for $M/m<4.97$ only the $q=0$ compressibility instability exists, at $M/m=4.97$ the denominator vanishes simultaneously at $q=0$ and $q/k_F=0.83$ (a triple point), and for $M/m>4.97$ a charge density wave onsets at finite $q$ at a smaller $r_s$ than the $q=0$ instability. Near the instability the electrons have positive bulk modulus and the heavier positive fermions negative, so the light electrons are what stabilize the system, the reverse of the usual rigid-background picture.

Load-bearing premise

The finite-wave-vector part of the prediction rests on the assumption that the local field factor of the positive fermions keeps growing like $q^2$ all the way to twice the Fermi wave vector even when their effective density parameter exceeds 10, a regime where no direct numerical data exist; if that growth instead saturates, the charge density wave boundary shifts or disappears.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For mass ratios below 4.97, the only instability is at $q=0$, so the uniform gas is predicted to remain stable against periodic density modulations until the compressibility divergence is reached.
  • At the triple point $M/m=4.97$ the response denominator vanishes simultaneously at $q=0$ and $q/k_F=0.83$, so the uniform gas, the $q=0$ condensation, and the charge density wave meet at one precise density.
  • For mass ratios above 4.97, the charge density wave appears at a higher density (smaller $r_s$) than the $q=0$ instability, and for $M/m>9$ the equilibrium density itself lies inside the predicted charge density wave region.
  • Close to the charge density wave, the positive-fermion part of the electron-electron interaction is attractive and large, which the companion paper uses to argue for an enhanced superconducting transition temperature and a $T^2$ term in the normal-state resistivity.
  • The closed-form response functions reproduce the previously computed density-functional phase diagram in the region of overlap, including the triple point and examples of charge density waves, with a much lighter calculation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the same determinant $\Delta$ controls both the density instability and the effective electron-electron interaction used for pairing, the model implies that the charge density wave and superconducting channels are not independent; tuning the mass ratio toward 4.97 from below should strengthen pairing even where the charge density wave is not the ground state.
  • If the neglected electron-positive fermion correlation local field factor $G_{12}$ turns out to be significant at finite $q$, the triple-point ratio 4.97 and the critical wave vector $0.83k_F$ will shift, and the analytic formulas make the revised phase diagram easy to recompute.
  • The model's clean separation of scales suggests a direct search in electron-hole liquids: the $q=0$ instability is predicted at exactly 1.25 times the equilibrium $r_s$ for every mass ratio, a mass-ratio-independent signature that could be tested by tuning density.
  • Extending the same two-species screening construction to two dimensions would test whether the existence of a finite threshold mass ratio for charge density waves survives in lower dimension.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a T=0 model of the three-dimensional electron-positive-fermion gas as two independent fermion gases coupled only by the Coulomb interaction, with intra-species exchange and correlation described by uniform-electron-gas local field factors and inter-species correlation set to zero (G12=0). The central technical result is a closed-form expression for the two-species linear response functions, Eqs. (1)-(3) and (14), whose denominator determines instabilities. The paper reports a universal q=0 compressibility instability when the total bulk modulus vanishes, Eq. (13), and a finite-q charge-density-wave instability for mass ratios M/m>=4.97, with a triple point at M/m=4.97. It also presents induced densities due to a test charge and compares the resulting phase diagram with the DFT results of Han, Zhang, and Dai [12]. The model is intended as a simple analytic framework for the phase diagram and for the effective interactions used in the companion paper.

Significance. If the CDW prediction is correct, the model provides a transparent and easily reproducible analytic route to a complex phase diagram, and it gives a physical picture in which additional screening by the positive fermions produces the CDW and enhances superconductivity. The q=0 instability is robust: it follows from the compressibility sum rule and the bulk modulus of the two-component system, independent of the questionable local-field-factor extrapolation. The paper is unusually candid about its limitations, and the closed-form formulas make the calculations easy to check. However, the CDW branch and the triple point rest on an unvalidated extrapolation of the positive-fermion local field factor to effective densities rs>10, and the agreement with DFT [12] is partly circular because the same kernel was used. The significance of the central quantitative claim is therefore contingent on assumptions that the manuscript itself identifies as unsupported.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section V; Eq. (14); Eq. (C17)] The finite-q CDW branch is load-bearing for the paper's main claim and is not established by the evidence presented. Eq. (14) shows that the finite-q zero of the denominator requires a sufficiently large negative contribution from -v*Pi01/epsilon_ht, and epsilon_ht contains G1+. The paper evaluates G1+ by scaling the electron-gas local field factor to the effective density rs1=(M/m)rs2; in the CDW region (M/m>=4.97, rs2 roughly 2.4-3.4) this gives rs1>10. Section V explicitly states that there are no QMC data for G1+ in this density regime, that QMC at rs=2, 5, and 10 has very little data below 2kF, that the exchange-only calculation of Ref. [23] shows sub-q^2 growth at rs=5 and 10, and that using the Hubbard or RPA form removes the CDW. Since the paper itself says the CDW will move out in q or disappear if these terms are smaller, the assertions that charge density waves occur for M/m>4.97 and that an equilibrium CDW exists for M/m>9 are conditional on an unsupported extrapolation. The authors should either supply a sensitivity analysis over plausible low-density G1+ forms or explicitly present the CDW branch as a model-dependent prediction, not as a definitive result.
  2. [Section III; Fig. 8] The claimed validation against DFT [12] is circular and should be reframed. The manuscript states that the agreement between Fig. 8 and Fig. 3 of Ref. [12] "should have been expected, because the density functional theory used the same local field factor to construct the kernel, and scaled the results to the positive fermion." Consequently, Fig. 8 does not independently validate the model's key assumption about the low-density positive-fermion local field factor; it only shows that the two calculations are internally consistent given the same input. The independent evidence consists of the q=0 instability, which follows from the compressibility sum rule, and the energy/pressure comparisons in Appendix A. Please distinguish these two types of evidence when presenting the validation.
  3. [Appendix C; Eq. (C17); Eq. (13)] The definition of the local field factor in Eq. (C17) is inconsistent with the derivation of Eq. (13). Eq. (C17) says that the bulk modulus B=1/kappa used in G2+ is obtained by differentiating the sum of the electron and positive fermion energies. The small-q reduction of q^2*Delta in Eq. (13), however, requires G2+ to satisfy the electron-gas compressibility sum rule with the electron compressibility kappa_2, and G1+ to satisfy the positive-fermion sum rule with kappa_1. If the total compressibility is literally used in both local field factors, the cancellation leading to Eq. (13) instead gives 2*q_TF2^2*kappa_02*(M/m)*(1/kappa_1+1/kappa_2), not the displayed q_TF2^2*kappa_02*(M/m)*(1/kappa_1+1/kappa_2). Please clarify which compressibility is used in the numerical work and correct Eq. (C17) or Eq. (13) accordingly.
  4. [Section II; Eq. (14)] The neglect of electron-positive fermion correlation, G12=0, is also load-bearing for the CDW branch. G12 enters the denominator Delta through the cross term in Eqs. (3) and (9), so Eq. (14) is valid only for G12=0. Section II itself calls the assumption that the missing correlation energy is small and density-independent "a crucial assumption that may not hold over the full range of densities and mass ratios." The energy comparisons in Appendix A are made near the energy minimum, whereas the CDW instability occurs at densities away from that minimum. The density dependence of the missing correlation is therefore unconstrained exactly where it matters. The authors should estimate or bound G12, or explicitly mark the CDW phase boundaries as provisional until this correlation is calculated.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (6)] Equation (6) has a sign error in the numerator: the factor should be 1 - v*Pi01*(1-2G12)/epsilon_ht, not 1 + v*Pi01*(1-2G12)/epsilon_ht. As written it is inconsistent with Eq. (7).
  2. [Eq. (19)] Equation (19) has an incorrect sign in the denominator. Cancellation of the first factor in Eq. (18) gives V_eff2+ = -v/[1 + (2 - G2+ - 2G12)*v*Pi02], not -v/[1 - (2 + G2+ - 2G12)*v*Pi02]. In the G2+=G12=0 limit the printed form produces a spurious q=0 divergence at v*Pi0=1/2, contradicting the equal-mass no-divergence statement in the same paragraph.
  3. [Section V and references] The citations [22] and [23] appear to be swapped in Section V: the QMC results at rs=2, 5, and 10 are from Moroni, Ceperley, and Senatore (Ref. [23], 1995), while the recent exchange-only calculation is Nazarov and Silkin (Ref. [22], 2024). Please correct the citation numbering or text.
  4. [Introduction] The sentence "A summary and conclusions are given in Section IV" should refer to Section V, which is where the summary and conclusions actually appear.
  5. [Abstract and throughout] The phrase "exact formulas" overstates the status of the response functions; they are closed-form analytic expressions that depend on approximate and extrapolated local field factors. Suggest using "closed-form" or "analytic" throughout.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the CDW and q=0 instabilities follow from stated linear-response equations plus an explicitly flagged local-field-factor assumption, though the DFT agreement is not an independent validation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is internally self-contained: the response functions (Eqs. 1-5, C12-C14) are standard linear-response results with local field factors, and the instabilities are identified as zeros of the denominator Eq. (14). The q=0 instability follows from the compressibility sum rule and the input bulk modulus, while the finite-q CDW requires a nontrivial cancellation in 1+(1-G2+-vPi01/epsilon_ht)vPi02=0; it is not definitionally identical to the local field factor input. The paper is transparent that the CDW depends crucially on the assumed q^2 growth of G1+ at effective rs>10, where no QMC data exist (Section V: 'I have assumed that this q2 behavior continues as rs becomes larger'), so the prediction is contingent but not circular. The comparison to DFT [12] is weakened by the author's own admission that 'the agreement ... should have been expected, because the density functional theory used the same local field factor to construct the kernel,' but this is a limitation on independent validation, not a reduction of the derivation to its inputs. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing uniqueness claim rests on self-citation. The main scientific risk is the unvalidated low-density extrapolation of the local field factor, which is an assumption about input physics rather than a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model introduces no new particles or forces; the only fitted input is the local field factor from electron gas QMC, and the central assumptions are the neglect of electron-positive fermion correlation and the extrapolated q^2 growth of the local field factor at low density.

free parameters (1)
  • Local field factor slope coefficient (1 - k0/k) in G2+(q) = (1 - k0/k)(q/qTF)^2 = rs-dependent; approximately 1 - rs/5.25 in the metallic density range
    The q-dependent local field factor, fitted to electron gas QMC data, controls whether a finite-q divergence occurs. Its extrapolation to effective rs > 10 for the positive fermion gas is the load-bearing input for the CDW prediction.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The positive fermion gas is the same as the electron gas with mass M, since the Hamiltonian depends only on charge squared.
    Used throughout Section II and Appendix A to reuse electron gas energies, pressure and bulk modulus for the positive fermions.
  • ad hoc to paper Electron-positive fermion correlation is neglected, i.e., G12 = 0 and the energy is the sum of the two single-species energies.
    Stated in Section II and Appendix A; the paper argues from comparisons to previous work that this is small, but it is an uncontrolled approximation.
  • ad hoc to paper The electron local field factor G2+(q) continues to increase as q^2 up to q = 2kF and the same form holds at the low effective densities of the positive fermions (effective rs > 10).
    Invoked in Section III and V to obtain CDW instabilities; the paper notes the absence of QMC data below 2kF at rs > 2 and that exchange-only calculations show a slower growth at rs = 5 and 10.
  • domain assumption Each species remains uniform, so a uniform neutralizing background can be assigned to the other species.
    Stated in the introduction; the model breaks down when the density becomes non-uniform, i.e., exactly at the CDW instability.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Charge density waves and superconductivity in the electron-positive fermion gas using a simple intuitive model. Part I: The model, instabilities, and phase diagram." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XT7M4F7B

@misc{pith2026241117001,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Charge density waves and superconductivity in the electron-positive fermion gas using a simple intuitive model. Part I: The model, instabilities, and phase diagram},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XT7M4F7B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17001}
}
abstract

The electron-positive fermion gas in three dimensions and $T=0$ is modeled as two independent fermion gases interacting via the coulomb interaction. The main advantage of the simple model is that all existing results from the electron gas can be directly used for the positive fermion gas, which is the same as the electron gas, but scaled for the mass of the positive fermion. Additional screening from the positive fermions together with use of an accurate local field factor naturally introduces charge density waves in addition to the $q=0$ instability that occurs when the bulk modulus equals zero. The electron-positive fermion gas is completely specified by the density $r_s$ and the mass ratio $M/m$. Although the problem and model can be simply stated, the resulting phase diagram is complex and not fully understood. The results of the simple model are exact formulas, and are in close agreement with earlier numerical results obtained using density functional theory in their region of overlap. Using these results, the electron-electron, positive fermion-positive fermion and electron-positive fermion many body effective interactions are calculated in the following paper. For conditions close to the charge density wave, the positive fermion contribution to the electron-electron interaction, which is attractive and the source of the superconductivity, becomes large and significantly enhances the superconducting transition temperature, as well as leading to a large $T^2$ contribution to the normal state electrical resistivity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17001 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. clearly shows that there is an asymptotic min￾imum value of rs for the energy minimum near 1.62 as the positive fermion mass goes to infinity. This occurs because the kinetic energy of the heavier particle goes to zero. Interestingly, this is near the value of rs estimated FIG. 1. Linear measure of density rs where the energy of the electron-positive fermion in the simple model gas is minimum, and the rs where the b… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The accurate local field factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) shows that at the rs of the energy mini￾mum, the denominator is well above zero and reasonably well behaved. There is no instability. However if there is a pseudo potential or other mechanism to reduce the density to approximately 1.25 times the rs of the energy minimum, the denominator become zero, and system is unstable at q = 0. For 1 < M/m < 4.97, the instability occurs at q = 0. At M/m = 4.97, the denominat… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Plot of ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Plot of ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Critical density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) First unstable wave vector, when decreasing den [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The total induced density ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The induced density ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. (a) Total energy per electron of the three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. (a) Energy per particle (electron or positive fermion) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Top - Pressure and bulk modulus of the single species Fermi gas (electron or positive fermion) plotted versus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_13.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. (a) Energy of the electron-proton gas as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_15.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [12]

    Charge density waves in a quantum plasma

    Zhaoyu Han, Shiwei Zhang, and Xi Dai. Charge density waves in a quantum plasma. Physical Review B, 100(15): 155132, 2019

    work page 2019

  2. [23]

    Carl A Kukkonen and A. W. Overhauser. Electron- electron interaction in simple metals. Physical Review B, 20(2):550, 1979

    work page 1979

  3. [1]

    This model has only one parameter, rs, the linear measure of the density of the electron gas (1 /n = 4π(rsa0)3/3 and a0 is the Bohr ra- dius)

    Uniform Electron Gas The electron gas in a uniform positive background is the well-studied and textbook example [11, 24] used to calculate many properties of metals. This model has only one parameter, rs, the linear measure of the density of the electron gas (1 /n = 4π(rsa0)3/3 and a0 is the Bohr ra- dius). The uniform positive background deserves further...

    work page

  4. [2]

    κ = 1/B is the compressibility

    = κ02/κ2 at q = 0 through the compressibility sum rule. κ = 1/B is the compressibility. κ0 is the compressibility of non-interacting fermions. I expect that a more complete theory has a similar sum rule. At small q, the first term in Eq. (13) is a constant and the next two terms are proportional to 1 /q2. The denominator in Eqs. (7 & 8) at q = 0 is q2∆ = ...

    work page

  5. [3]

    It is known from the electron gas that εet = 1 + (1 − G2+vΠ0

    = 0. It is known from the electron gas that εet = 1 + (1 − G2+vΠ0

    work page

  6. [4]

    Therefore it is the additional screening −vΠ0 1/εht from the positive fermions that drives the divergence and charge density waves

    > 0 and the same is true for εht and neither di- verge. Therefore it is the additional screening −vΠ0 1/εht from the positive fermions that drives the divergence and charge density waves. The discussion below will show that for certain mass ratios M/m, there is a divergence at intermediate q/kF where the Lindhard function is close to one and slowly varyin...

    work page

  7. [5]

    (19) At q = 0, ∆ n2 = 1/2 and ∆ n1 = −1/2 and the induced density ∆n = (∆n1 + ∆n2) = 0, and the induced charge density ∆ρ/e = (∆n1 − ∆n2) = −1

    = −V eff 1+ . (19) At q = 0, ∆ n2 = 1/2 and ∆ n1 = −1/2 and the induced density ∆n = (∆n1 + ∆n2) = 0, and the induced charge density ∆ρ/e = (∆n1 − ∆n2) = −1. The case of equal masses is unusual because in the simple model because ∆ n1 = −B2/B appears to diverge when B = 0, but since B = B1 +B2 and B1 = B2, ∆n1 = B2/B = 1/2 and there is no divergence at q ...

    work page

  8. [6]

    = 0 (see Eq. (14)). The existence of the charge density wave depends cru- cially on the terms G2+ and −vΠ0 1/εht. If either of these terms are smaller, then the charge density wave will be moved out to larger q or disappear altogether. 13 I believe that the fundamental issue is the interme- diate q dependence of the local field factors. Quantum Monte Carl...

    work page

Show all 39 references
  1. [7]

    Structure of liquid metallic hydrogen as a two-component fermi fluid at t= 0

    Tapash Chakraborty, A Kallio, LJ Lantto, and P Pietil¨ ainen. Structure of liquid metallic hydrogen as a two-component fermi fluid at t= 0. Physical Review B, 27(5):3061, 1983

    1983

  2. [8]

    Ground state of solid hydrogen at high pressures

    David M Ceperley and Berni J Alder. Ground state of solid hydrogen at high pressures. Physical Review B, 36 (4):2092, 1987

    1987

  3. [9]

    Superconductiv- ity in electron liquids with and without intermediaries

    CF Richardson and NW Ashcroft. Superconductiv- ity in electron liquids with and without intermediaries. Physical Review B, 54(2):R764, 1996

    1996

  4. [10]

    This first term in Eq

    Electron-positive fermion gas The positive fermions are assumed to have a heavier mass than the electrons. This first term in Eq. (A2) is the kinetic energy which scales inversely as the mass. For a heavier mass, the kinetic energy is lower. The negative exchange energy is ind...

  5. [11]

    the effect of replacing the rigid background by the proton fluid ap- pears to be surprisingly small

    Comparison to previous work I have compared the energy, pressure and bulk modu- lus of the simple model to previous work. The electron hole liquid was the subject of significant research in the 1970s [2, 3]. A primary goal was to calculate the corre- lation energy to predict t...

    1982

  6. [13]

    [3], differing only by a factor of two in the definition of the electron-positive fermion local field factor G12

    The results are V b 11 = εetV ext 1+ − V b 12Π0 2(1 − 2G12)V ext 2+ ∆ (C12) V eff 2+ = εhtV ext 2+ − V b 12Π0 1(1 − 2G12)V ext 1+ ∆ (C13) ∆ = εetεht − (V b 12)2Π0 1Π0 2(1 − 2G12)2 (C14) These are the results obtained in Ref. [3], differing only by a factor of two in the defini...

  7. [14]

    Electron interaction in solids

    David Pines. Electron interaction in solids. Canadian Journal of Physics, 34:1378, 1956

    1956

  8. [15]

    Electron-hole liquids in semiconductors

    WF Brinkman and TM Rice. Electron-hole liquids in semiconductors. Physical Review B, 7(4):1508, 1973

    1973

  9. [16]

    Electron- hole liquid in many-band systems

    P Vashishta, P Bhattacharyya, and KS Singwi. Electron- hole liquid in many-band systems. i. ge and si under large uniaxial strain. Physical Review B, 10(12):5108, 1974

    1974

  10. [17]

    Possibility of superconductivity in the electron-hole liquid

    Giovanni Vignale and Kundan S Singwi. Possibility of superconductivity in the electron-hole liquid. Physical Review B, 31(5):2729, 1985

    1985

  11. [18]

    In summary, the electron gas in a uniform background has a minimum energy at rs = 4 .19

    and further references therein. In summary, the electron gas in a uniform background has a minimum energy at rs = 4 .19. It takes work to either increase or decrease the density. This work must be done by the uniform background. The electron gas kinetic energy shown in Fig.11 ...

  12. [19]

    Ground-state energies of simple metals

    J Hammerberg and NW Ashcroft. Ground-state energies of simple metals. Physical Review B, 9(2):409, 1974

    1974

  13. [20]

    The denominator was discussed in detail in Section III

    that equals 1 at q = 0, 1/2 at q = 2kF , and falls off quickly at larger q. The denominator was discussed in detail in Section III. 11 FIG. 10. The induced density ∆ n1 + ∆n2 as a function of q/kF for mass ratios M/m = 1.2, 3.0, 4.97, and 6.0 for rs at 0.8, 1.0 and 1.2 times r...

  14. [21]

    The electron-positive fermion gas is as- sumed to be paramagnetic and unpolarized

    For simple elec- trons and holes, both would be the coulomb interaction v = 4 πe2/q2 with the appropriate sign for equal or op- posite charges. The electron-positive fermion gas is as- sumed to be paramagnetic and unpolarized. The elec- trons and positive fermions are distingu...

  15. [22]

    Ground state of metallic hydrogen

    Sudip Chakravarty and NW Ashcroft. Ground state of metallic hydrogen. Physical Review B, 18(9):4588, 1978

    1978

  16. [24]

    Quantum Theory of the Electron Liquid

    Gabriele Giuliani and Giovanni Vignale. Quantum Theory of the Electron Liquid. Cambridge University Press, 2005

    2005

  17. [25]

    How metals bind: 24 The deformable-jellium model with correlated electrons

    Hoang T Tran and John P Perdew. How metals bind: 24 The deformable-jellium model with correlated electrons. American Journal of Physics, 71(10):1048–1061, 2003

    2003

  18. [26]

    Metallic hydrogen: A high-temperature superconductor? Physical Review Letters, 21(26):1748, 1968

    Neil W Ashcroft. Metallic hydrogen: A high-temperature superconductor? Physical Review Letters, 21(26):1748, 1968

    1968

  19. [27]

    Stabilized jellium: Structureless pseudopotential model for the cohesive and surface properties of metals.Physical Review B, 42(18):11627, 1990

    John P Perdew, Huy Q Tran, and Elizabeth D Smith. Stabilized jellium: Structureless pseudopotential model for the cohesive and surface properties of metals.Physical Review B, 42(18):11627, 1990

    1990

  20. [28]

    Accurate and simple ana- lytic representation of the electron-gas correlation energy

    John P Perdew and Yue Wang. Accurate and simple ana- lytic representation of the electron-gas correlation energy. Physical review B, 45(23):13244, 1992

    1992

  21. [29]

    Universal behavior of exchange-correlation energy in electron-hole liquid

    P Vashishta and RK Kalia. Universal behavior of exchange-correlation energy in electron-hole liquid. Physical Review B, 25(10):6492, 1982

    1982

  22. [30]

    Collective modes, effective interaction and superconductivity in the electron-hole liquid

    Giovanni Vignale. Collective modes, effective interaction and superconductivity in the electron-hole liquid. North- western University, 1984

    1984

  23. [31]

    Qmc-consistent static spin and density local field factors for the uniform electron gas

    Aaron D Kaplan and Carl A Kukkonen. Qmc-consistent static spin and density local field factors for the uniform electron gas. Physical Review B, 107(20):L201120, 2023

    2023

  24. [32]

    Electron-electron scattering in simple metals

    Carl A Kukkonen and John W Wilkins. Electron-electron scattering in simple metals. Physical Review B, 19(12): 6075, 1979

    1979

  25. [33]

    Density functional theory perspective on the non- linear response of correlated electrons across temperature regimes

    Zhandos Moldabekov, Jan Vorberger, and Tobias Dorn- heim. Density functional theory perspective on the non- linear response of correlated electrons across temperature regimes. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 18(5):2900–2912, 2022

    2022

  26. [34]

    Quantitative electron- electron interaction using local field factors from quan- tum monte carlo calculations

    Carl A Kukkonen and Kun Chen. Quantitative electron- electron interaction using local field factors from quan- tum monte carlo calculations. Physical Review B, 104 (19):195142, 2021

    2021

  27. [35]

    Exchange kernel fxh (q, ω) of electron liquid from the variational principle of mclachlan

    Vladimir U Nazarov and Vyacheslav M Silkin. Exchange kernel fxh (q, ω) of electron liquid from the variational principle of mclachlan. Physical Review B, 110(10): 104310, 2024

    2024

  28. [36]

    Static response and local field factor of the electron gas

    Saverio Moroni, David M Ceperley, and Gaetano Sena- tore. Static response and local field factor of the electron gas. Physical review letters, 75(4):689, 1995

    1995

  29. [37]

    N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin. Solid State Physics. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York London, 1976

    1976

  30. [39]

    Effective two-body interaction in coulomb fermi liquids

    G Vignale and KS Singwi. Effective two-body interaction in coulomb fermi liquids. Physical Review B, 32(4):2156, 1985

    1985

  31. [120]

    A body centered cubic Wigner lat- tice at rs somewhat above 100 has lower energy than the uniform gas

    A uniform electron density remains a solution within the approximations. A body centered cubic Wigner lat- tice at rs somewhat above 100 has lower energy than the uniform gas. Other possibilities include ferromagnetic alignment of the electron spins, charge density waves and s...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.