Event-based Spiking Neural Networks for Object Detection: A Review of Datasets, Architectures, Learning Rules, and Implementation

Craig Iaboni; Pramod Abichandani

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 300 references

Event-based Spiking Neural Networks for Object Detection: A Review of Datasets, Architectures, Learning Rules, and Implementation

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A systematic review of 151 articles on spiking neural networks for computer vision codifies the architectures, learning rules, and hardware trade-offs that a practitioner needs to choose among.

desk verdict Useful practitioner review with a real code base, but the central quantitative synthesis isn't auditable and the counts in Section II.E don't foot to 151. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17006 v1 pith:EQJBB7DT submitted 2024-11-26 cs.CV

Craig Iaboni , Pramod Abichandani This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.CV

keywords spikingneuralnetworksobjectdetectioneventcamerasneuromorphichardwareSTDPsurrogategradientsANN-to-SNNconversionsystematicreview

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review of 151 peer-reviewed articles on spiking neural networks (SNNs) for computer vision sets out to organize the field into a small number of comparables: architecture families, learning-rule families, implementation mediums, and evaluation metrics. It claims that, read together, these papers support a codification of which architectural and training choices have been reported to work, and with what trade-offs in energy, latency, and memory on neuromorphic hardware. The paper's practical purpose is to give a newcomer a structured pipeline—from data acquisition and encoding through architecture, learning, implementation, and evaluation—plus an open-source repository of runnable examples, so that design decisions can be grounded in documented evidence rather than trial and error. A sympathetic reader would care because the SNN literature is fragmented across isolated surveys of learning rules, hardware, and applications; this review attempts the integration that makes the field navigable.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the systematic categorization scheme plus the six-stage practitioner pipeline. The scheme classifies every reviewed article along four axes—architecture (FCSNN, HSNN, SCNN, SDBN, SRNN), learning rule (direct unsupervised, direct supervised, indirect), implementation medium (simulation or neuromorphic hardware), and evaluation metric (accuracy, energy, latency, memory)—and the pipeline orders these axes into data type, encoding, architecture, learning, implementation, and evaluation. The scheme carries the argument because all of the paper's distributions, tables, and trade-off statements are derived from it.

What would settle it

An independent systematic search over the same databases (IEEE Xplore, Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar) and years (2000–2023) with explicit query strings that yields a materially different distribution of architectures or learning rules—for example, fewer than 23 spiking-convolutional papers or a different leading training method—would falsify the codification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the 151 selected studies, analyzed through a PRISMA-guided systematic review, support a single practitioner framework for event-based SNN object detection. The review codifies three things: the effectiveness of fully connected, hierarchical, convolutional, deep-belief, and recurrent architectures; the performance of direct unsupervised (STDP-family), direct supervised (temporal backpropagation, surrogate gradients), and indirect (ANN-to-SNN conversion) learning methods; and the trade-offs among energy, latency, and memory across simulation and neuromorphic hardware implementation mediums. It reports, for example, that spiking convolutional networks are the most frequently discussed architecture in the surveyed set, that STDP and surrogate-gradient methods dominate the learning side, and that conversion from pre-trained ANNs is a practical but temporally limited shortcut. On that basis, the paper asserts that a practitioner can choose datasets, architectures, learning rules, and hardware by consulting the documented distributions and accuracy tables rather than starting from scratch.

Load-bearing premise

The 151 papers that survived screening are a representative and unbiased sample of the whole spiking-neural-network-for-computer-vision literature, so the reported distributions and trade-offs truly describe the field.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A newcomer can use the framework and the companion code repository to select a dataset, encoding, architecture, learning rule, and hardware combination that matches documented trade-offs rather than relying on trial and error.
The reported dominance of spiking convolutional networks implies that spatial feature extraction is the current main driver of SNN object-detection performance.
The survey's accuracy tables provide concrete reference points—for example, unsupervised STDP reaching about 95% on MNIST, surrogate-gradient training reaching about 99% on N-MNIST, and ANN-to-SNN conversion exceeding 99% on MNIST—that future work can benchmark against.
The documented energy, latency, and memory trade-offs give practitioners a decision rule for choosing between simulation environments and neuromorphic hardware for a given deployment target.
The challenges the review identifies—training stability, limited hardware accessibility, and the lack of native temporal learning in conversion—define the field's near-term research agenda.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the codification is correct, an implicit implication is that reported accuracy differences across studies may be driven as much by dataset and encoding choices as by architecture or learning rule; the paper does not hold encoding fixed when comparing methods, so an apples-to-apples benchmark varying encoding alone would be a natural test of that implication.
The claim that converted SNNs lack native temporal learning suggests a testable extension: conversion followed by surrogate-gradient fine-tuning on event data should recover some of the temporal performance, a hybrid the review points toward but does not evaluate systematically.
The qualitative trade-off statements could be turned into a quantitative Pareto frontier: mining the 151 papers for raw energy and latency numbers would let practitioners see which hardware platforms dominate which regimes.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a genuinely useful practitioner-oriented review with a working code repository, but the quantitative synthesis at its center doesn't hold up to arithmetic. Section II.E reports 9 simulated + 5 hardware = 14 implementation-medium papers, 23+12+12+11+9 = 67 architecture categorizations, and 17+10+13 = 40 learning-rule categorizations. None of these sums to 151, and the figures are captioned as distributions of the reviewed papers. Either the text is wrong, the figures cover a subset, or most papers were unclassifiable—the manuscript doesn't say which. Without the list of included studies or exact search strings, a reader cannot reconcile.

Credit where it's due: the paper does something no prior review does in one place. It connects datasets, architectures, learning rules, and hardware into a single applied pipeline, adds a PRISMA flow and a practitioner framework (Figure 5), and ships an open-source repository with runnable examples for encoding, training, and simulation. The neuron-model and coding sections are competent; the STDP variant taxonomy is useful; the hardware summaries are accurate. That is real service, and the code is independently checkable.

Soft spots, in proportion. The 'codifies effectiveness' wording overstates what is, at bottom, a catalog of reported accuracies. There is no quantitative meta-analysis, no error bars, no assessment of whether the reported numbers were reproduced. The internal inconsistency about simulated vs hardware counts is not cosmetic: the central claim of the review is the codification of trends from this corpus, and the corpus distribution is not verifiable. The authors also repeatedly cite their own repository [71] for tutorials; that's benign self-reference and not a problem for the main claims.

Who is this for? A newcomer or a practitioner needing a map of the field and a copy-paste starting point. That reader will get genuine value even in the current form.

Recommendation: a serious editor should send this to peer review—the field needs integrative reviews and the repo is evidence of effort. But acceptance should require the authors to list all 151 included studies, provide exact search strings and screening logs, reconcile the counts in Section II.E, and temper the effectiveness claims. If they do that, this becomes a solid reference.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a systematic review, following a stated PRISMA-style methodology, of 151 journal and conference articles on event-based spiking neural networks (SNNs) for computer vision, with a focus on object detection. The paper organizes the literature into datasets, architectures, learning rules, implementation mediums, and evaluation metrics, and it proposes a practitioner framework that connects data acquisition, encoding, architecture choice, learning method, implementation, and evaluation. It also provides an open-source repository with Python examples and identifies open challenges for SNN-based computer vision.

Significance. If the quantitative synthesis is reliable, the review fills a real gap: prior surveys treat learning rules, hardware, and applications separately, whereas this paper attempts a unified codification with a practitioner-oriented pipeline and an accompanying code repository. The breadth of coverage—spanning neuron models, encodings, datasets, simulators, neuromorphic chips, learning rules, and architectures—makes it a potentially useful entry point for newcomers. The paper ships concrete artifacts: a public repository, tables comparing frameworks and hardware, and a summary of accuracy numbers drawn from the literature. However, the central value of the review depends on the credibility and auditability of the claimed analysis of 151 articles, and that evidentiary base is currently not transparent or internally consistent.

major comments (4)

[Section II.E] The quantitative synthesis reported in Section II.E does not reconcile with the stated corpus of 151 papers. The implementation-medium counts are 9 + 5 = 14, the architecture counts are 23 + 12 + 12 + 11 + 9 = 67, and the learning-rule counts are 17 + 10 + 13 = 40. None of these sums equals 151, and the text does not explain whether papers can belong to multiple categories, whether most papers were unclassifiable, or whether the figures describe only a subset. Because the abstract's central claim is that the review 'codifies' trends from 151 articles, these distribution counts are load-bearing. The manuscript must either provide a complete reconciliation (e.g., a full coding table with per-paper categories and percentages, including multi-label counts) or explicitly restrict the claims in the abstract and figures to the subset of papers for which each categorization was possible.
[Section II (Methodology)] The PRISMA-based selection process is not auditable as reported. The identification stage lists broad search terms ('SNN applications,' 'SNN learning rules,' etc.) but gives no exact query strings, no database-specific search strings, no screening decision rules beyond broad eligibility bullets, and no log of exclusions. Crucially, the 151 included studies are never listed, so a reader cannot verify that the claimed distributions in Figures 2 and 3, or the narrative conclusions about architecture and learning-rule prevalence, actually follow from the cited corpus. A systematic review should include either a reference list of all included studies (in an appendix or supplementary file) and a PRISMA-style screening table, or the methodology section should be revised to describe the selection process as an illustrative scoping review rather than a fully auditable systematic review.
[Abstract and Section II.D] The abstract states that the review 'codifies: 1) the effectiveness of fully connected, convolutional, and recurrent architectures; 2) the performance of direct unsupervised, direct supervised, and indirect learning methods; and 3) the trade-offs in energy consumption, latency, and memory in neuromorphic hardware implementations.' However, the body mostly tabulates reported accuracy numbers and qualitative framework features rather than providing a controlled comparison of effectiveness or performance across architectures, learning rules, or hardware. For example, Table V lists accuracies such as 95% (MNIST, additive STDP), 99.1% (Caltech 101, multiplicative STDP), and 98.89% (MNIST, STBP) from different studies with different datasets, preprocessing, and network sizes; these numbers are not commensurable evidence for 'effectiveness' or 'performance' as codified conclusions. The authors should either add a structured comparative analysis that normalizes or contextualizes these numbers (e.g., by dataset, architecture capacity, and evaluation protocol) or temper the abstract and conclusion claims to describe a taxonomy and reported trends rather than codified effectiveness.
[Section VI.B and VII] The paper's treatment of hardware and learning rules is largely descriptive and does not substantiate the claimed trade-offs among energy consumption, latency, and memory. Section VI.B discusses TrueNorth, Loihi, BrainScaleS, Tianjic, and SpiNNaker with their nominal specifications, and Section VII reviews learning rules, but the connection between the two—what measurable latency, energy, or memory consequences each learning rule or architecture has on a given hardware platform—is not systematically quantified or compared. Since the abstract explicitly lists these trade-offs as a codified outcome, the review needs either a dedicated comparative synthesis (e.g., a table with per-study energy/latency/memory measurements and their conditions) or a rewritten claim that such trade-offs are surveyed qualitatively without being codified.

minor comments (6)

[Section III] The sentence 'In addition to practitioners, this framework provides also provides a structured approach for educators...' contains a duplicated 'provides'; it should read 'this framework also provides a structured approach.'
[Section IV.C.1, Eq. (13)] Equation (13), describing the output firing rate of the residual membrane potential neuron, is typeset in a way that makes the floor function and the condition 'n ≥ 0' difficult to parse, and the variables n and N are not defined in the surrounding text. Please clarify the notation and the intended domain of the formula.
[Section I] The section ordering in the introduction is inconsistent with the actual order of sections: the text lists Section VIII before Section VII, and Sections IX and XI are mentioned but not described in sequence. Please align the roadmap with the final section numbering.
[Section VI.A] Table III would benefit from a column or note on whether each simulation framework has been used in the 151 reviewed papers or is included purely as background context; this would help the reader connect the framework descriptions to the quantitative synthesis.
[Section II.E] The caption of Figure 3 states that the right panel distinguishes 'software tools and hardware-based implementations,' but the text refers to 'simulated environments' and 'neuromorphic hardware implementations'; please align the caption terminology with the text.
[General] The paper repeatedly refers to its own GitHub repository [71] for tutorials and links. This self-reference is benign, but the main text should make clear that the repository is supplementary material and not one of the 151 analyzed articles, to avoid ambiguity in the corpus description.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review's synthesis is assembled from external literature, and its self-citations to the companion code repository are illustrative rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

This paper is a systematic review, not a derivation or prediction chain, so most circularity patterns do not apply. The central claims—codifying architectures, learning rules, and hardware trade-offs from 151 articles—are supported by citations to the external literature, not by the paper's own assumptions. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no quantity is defined in terms of a claimed conclusion, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked to force a choice. The manuscript repeatedly cites its own open-source repository [71], e.g., 'The repository also provides links for accessing common neuromorphic-captured datasets used in SNN research' and 'the accompanying open-source repository contains Jupyter notebooks demonstrating the implementation of various SNN architectures.' These self-citations point to tutorials and code, and they are not used as evidence for the surveyed effectiveness claims, so they are benign. The notable internal inconsistency in Section II.E—the reported implementation, architecture, and learning-rule counts sum to 14, 67, and 40, respectively, rather than 151—is a correctness and auditability problem in the quantitative synthesis, not a circularity. The absence of a verifiable included-study list weakens the empirical base but does not make the argument circular. Because the review derives no new results from its own inputs and its load-bearing evidence is external, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review's quantitative tallies and narrative conclusions rest on two domain assumptions: that the 151 selected papers are representative of the broader literature, and that each paper can be unambiguously classified into exactly one architecture and learning-rule category. Neither assumption is demonstrated, and the missing list of included studies makes both assumptions unfalsifiable from the manuscript.

assumptions (2)

domain assumption The 151 articles included in the review are a representative and unbiased sample of the SNN-for-computer-vision literature.
The PRISMA process described in Section II is asserted to yield this set, but the lack of exact search strings, screening logs, and a list of included studies prevents verification. The distributional claims in Figures 2 and 3 depend on this assumption.
domain assumption Each selected study can be unambiguously classified into exactly one architecture and one learning-rule category.
Figures 2 and 3 count architectures and learning rules as disjoint categories, but many real SNN systems combine, for example, convolutional and recurrent elements or unsupervised and supervised stages. The single-label codification may therefore distort the field's actual practice.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Event-based Spiking Neural Networks for Object Detection: A Review of Datasets, Architectures, Learning Rules, and Implementation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EQJBB7DT

@misc{pith2026241117006,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Event-based Spiking Neural Networks for Object Detection: A Review of Datasets, Architectures, Learning Rules, and Implementation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EQJBB7DT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17006}
}

read the original abstract

Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) represent a biologically inspired paradigm offering an energy-efficient alternative to conventional artificial neural networks (ANNs) for Computer Vision (CV) applications. This paper presents a systematic review of datasets, architectures, learning methods, implementation techniques, and evaluation methodologies used in CV-based object detection tasks using SNNs. Based on an analysis of 151 journal and conference articles, the review codifies: 1) the effectiveness of fully connected, convolutional, and recurrent architectures; 2) the performance of direct unsupervised, direct supervised, and indirect learning methods; and 3) the trade-offs in energy consumption, latency, and memory in neuromorphic hardware implementations. An open-source repository along with detailed examples of Python code and resources for building SNN models, event-based data processing, and SNN simulations are provided. Key challenges in SNN training, hardware integration, and future directions for CV applications are also identified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17006 by the authors.

**Figure 15.** Overview of a Spiking Liquid State Machine (SLSM). The input signal is fed into a non-trainable liquid reservoir, composed of a dynamic and randomly connected network of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. The readout layer, which is trainable, interprets these patterns to produce the final output. patterns are then decoded by a set of linear units. An example of the Spiking LSM (SLSM) network architecture is shown i… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

[71]

Event-snn-resources,

C. Iaboni and P. Abichandani, “Event-snn-resources,” https://github. com/radlab-sketch/Event-SNN-Resources/, 2024, gitHub repository

2024
[1]

On the computational power of winner-take-all,

W. Maass, “On the computational power of winner-take-all,” Neural computation, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 2519–2535, 2000

2000
[2]

Triplets of spikes in a model of spike timing-dependent plasticity,

J.-P. Pfister and W. Gerstner, “Triplets of spikes in a model of spike timing-dependent plasticity,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 38, pp. 9673–9682, 2006

2006
[3]

The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain

F. Rosenblatt, “The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain.” Psychological review, vol. 65, no. 6, p. 386, 1958

1958
[4]

Minsky and S

M. Minsky and S. A. Papert, Perceptrons, reissue of the 1988 expanded edition with a new foreword by L ´eon Bottou: an introduction to computational geometry. MIT press, 2017

1988
[5]

Notice on the law that the population follows in its growth,

P. Verhulst, “Notice on the law that the population follows in its growth,” Corresp Math Phys , vol. 10, pp. 113–26, 1838
[6]

Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines,

V . Nair and G. E. Hinton, “Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines,” in Proceedings of the 27th international confer- ence on machine learning (ICML-10) , 2010, pp. 807–814

2010
[7]

Learning repre- sentations by back-propagating errors,

D. E. Rumelhart, G. E. Hinton, and R. J. Williams, “Learning repre- sentations by back-propagating errors,” nature, vol. 323, no. 6088, pp. 533–536, 1986

1986

Show all 300 references

[8]

Deep learning,

Y . LeCun, Y . Bengio, and G. Hinton, “Deep learning,”nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–444, 2015

2015
[9]

A new supervised learning algorithm for multiple spiking neural networks with application in epilepsy and seizure detection,

S. Ghosh-Dastidar and H. Adeli, “A new supervised learning algorithm for multiple spiking neural networks with application in epilepsy and seizure detection,” Neural networks , vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1419–1431, 2009

2009
[10]

Deep learning in spiking neural networks,

A. Tavanaei, M. Ghodrati, S. R. Kheradpisheh, T. Masquelier, and A. Maida, “Deep learning in spiking neural networks,” Neural net- works, vol. 111, pp. 47–63, 2019

2019
[11]

Supervised learning in spiking neural networks with resume: sequence learning, classification, and spike shifting,

F. Ponulak and A. Kasinski, “Supervised learning in spiking neural networks with resume: sequence learning, classification, and spike shifting,” Neural computation, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 467–510, 2010

2010
[12]

Bp-stdp: Approximating backpropagation using spike timing dependent plasticity,

A. Tavanaei and A. Maida, “Bp-stdp: Approximating backpropagation using spike timing dependent plasticity,” Neurocomputing, vol. 330, pp. 39–47, 2019

2019
[13]

Learning rules in spiking neural networks: A survey,

Z. Yi, J. Lian, Q. Liu, H. Zhu, D. Liang, and J. Liu, “Learning rules in spiking neural networks: A survey,” Neurocomputing, vol. 531, pp. 163–179, 2023

2023
[14]

A survey of supervised learning models for spiking neural network,

M. A. Agebure, P. A. Wumnaya, and E. Y . Baagyere, “A survey of supervised learning models for spiking neural network,” Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science , vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 35–49, 2021

2021
[15]

A review of snn implementation on fpga,

Q. T. Pham, T. Q. Nguyen, P. C. Hoang, Q. H. Dang, D. M. Nguyen, and H. H. Nguyen, “A review of snn implementation on fpga,” in 2021 international conference on multimedia analysis and pattern recognition (MAPR). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–6

2021
[16]

Spiking neural networks hardware im- plementations and challenges: A survey,

M. Bouvier, A. Valentian, T. Mesquida, F. Rummens, M. Reyboz, E. Vianello, and E. Beigne, “Spiking neural networks hardware im- plementations and challenges: A survey,” ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems (JETC) , vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1–35, 2019

2019
[17]

Brain-inspired spiking neural networks for industrial fault diagnosis: A survey, challenges, and opportunities,

H. Wang, Y .-F. Li, and K. Gryllias, “Brain-inspired spiking neural networks for industrial fault diagnosis: A survey, challenges, and opportunities,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.02429 , 2023

2023 arXiv
[18]

Research progress of spiking neural network in image classification: a review,

L.-Y . Niu, Y . Wei, W.-B. Liu, J.-Y . Long, and T.-h. Xue, “Research progress of spiking neural network in image classification: a review,” Applied intelligence, vol. 53, no. 16, pp. 19 466–19 490, 2023

2023
[19]

Evolving spiking neural network—a survey,

S. Schliebs and N. Kasabov, “Evolving spiking neural network—a survey,” Evolving Systems, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 87–98, 2013

2013
[20]

Evolving spiking neural network: a comprehensive survey of its variants and their results,

T. Ibad, S. J. A. Kadir, and N. Aziz, “Evolving spiking neural network: a comprehensive survey of its variants and their results,” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology , vol. 98, no. 24, pp. 4061–4081, 2020

2020
[21]

Training spiking neural networks using lessons from deep learning,

J. K. Eshraghian, M. Ward, E. O. Neftci, X. Wang, G. Lenz, G. Dwivedi, M. Bennamoun, D. S. Jeong, and W. D. Lu, “Training spiking neural networks using lessons from deep learning,”Proceedings of the IEEE , 2023

2023
[22]

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the prisma statement,

D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. G. Altman, and t. PRISMA Group*, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the prisma statement,” Annals of internal medicine, vol. 151, no. 4, pp. 264–269, 2009

2009
[23]

Deep spiking neural networks for large vocabulary automatic speech recognition,

J. Wu, E. Yılmaz, M. Zhang, H. Li, and K. C. Tan, “Deep spiking neural networks for large vocabulary automatic speech recognition,” Frontiers in neuroscience, vol. 14, p. 199, 2020

2020
[24]

Deep spiking neural network model for time-variant signals classification: a real-time speech recognition approach,

J. P. Dominguez-Morales, Q. Liu, R. James, D. Gutierrez-Galan, A. Jimenez-Fernandez, S. Davidson, and S. Furber, “Deep spiking neural network model for time-variant signals classification: a real-time speech recognition approach,” in 2018 International Joint Conference on Neur...

2018
[25]

A survey of robotics control based on learning-inspired spiking neural networks,

Z. Bing, C. Meschede, F. R ¨ohrbein, K. Huang, and A. C. Knoll, “A survey of robotics control based on learning-inspired spiking neural networks,” Frontiers in neurorobotics, vol. 12, p. 35, 2018

2018
[26]

Evolving spiking neural network controllers for autonomous robots,

H. Hagras, A. Pounds-Cornish, M. Colley, V . Callaghan, and G. Clarke, “Evolving spiking neural network controllers for autonomous robots,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA’04. 2004, vol. 5. IEEE, 2004, pp. 4620–4626

2004
[27]

Spiking neural network (snn) control of a flapping insect-scale robot,

T. S. Clawson, S. Ferrari, S. B. Fuller, and R. J. Wood, “Spiking neural network (snn) control of a flapping insect-scale robot,” in 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) . IEEE, 2016, pp. 3381–3388

2016
[28]

A neuromorphic processing system with spike-driven snn processor for wearable ecg classification,

H. Chu, Y . Yan, L. Gan, H. Jia, L. Qian, Y . Huan, L. Zheng, and Z. Zou, “A neuromorphic processing system with spike-driven snn processor for wearable ecg classification,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 511–523, 2022

2022
[29]

Energy efficient ecg classification with spiking neural network,

Z. Yan, J. Zhou, and W.-F. Wong, “Energy efficient ecg classification with spiking neural network,” Biomedical Signal Processing and Con- trol, vol. 63, p. 102170, 2021

2021
[30]

Dis- crimination of emg signals using a neuromorphic implementation of a spiking neural network,

E. Donati, M. Payvand, N. Risi, R. Krause, and G. Indiveri, “Dis- crimination of emg signals using a neuromorphic implementation of a spiking neural network,” IEEE transactions on biomedical circuits and systems, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 795–803, 2019

2019
[31]

Neural coding in spiking neural networks: A comparative study for robust neuromorphic systems,

W. Guo, M. E. Fouda, A. M. Eltawil, and K. N. Salama, “Neural coding in spiking neural networks: A comparative study for robust neuromorphic systems,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 15, p. 638474, 2021

2021
[32]

Rate coding or direct coding: Which one is better for accu- rate, robust, and energy-efficient spiking neural networks?

Y . Kim, H. Park, A. Moitra, A. Bhattacharjee, Y . Venkatesha, and P. Panda, “Rate coding or direct coding: Which one is better for accu- rate, robust, and energy-efficient spiking neural networks?” in ICASSP 2022-2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Sig...

2022
[33]

Temporal pattern coding in deep spiking neural networks,

B. Rueckauer and S.-C. Liu, “Temporal pattern coding in deep spiking neural networks,” in 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–8

2021
[34]

Skimming digits: neuromorphic classification of spike- encoded images,

G. K. Cohen, G. Orchard, S.-H. Leng, J. Tapson, R. B. Benosman, and A. Van Schaik, “Skimming digits: neuromorphic classification of spike- encoded images,” Frontiers in neuroscience, vol. 10, p. 184, 2016

2016
[35]

Unsupervised learning of digit recognition using spike-timing-dependent plasticity,

P. U. Diehl and M. Cook, “Unsupervised learning of digit recognition using spike-timing-dependent plasticity,” Frontiers in computational neuroscience, vol. 9, p. 99, 2015

2015
[36]

Unsupervised learning of event-based image recordings using spike-timing-dependent plasticity,

L. R. Iyer and A. Basu, “Unsupervised learning of event-based image recordings using spike-timing-dependent plasticity,” in 2017 Interna- tional Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) . IEEE, 2017, pp. 1840–1846

2017
[37]

An event-driven categorization model for aer image sensors using multispike encoding and learning,

R. Xiao, H. Tang, Y . Ma, R. Yan, and G. Orchard, “An event-driven categorization model for aer image sensors using multispike encoding and learning,” IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 3649–3657, 2019

2019
[38]

Scene context classification with event-driven spiking deep neural networks,

P. Negri, M. Soto, B. Linares-Barranco, and T. Serrano-Gotarredona, “Scene context classification with event-driven spiking deep neural networks,” in 2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems (ICECS) . IEEE, 2018, pp. 569–572

2018
[39]

Hfirst: A temporal approach to object recogni- tion,

G. Orchard, C. Meyer, R. Etienne-Cummings, C. Posch, N. Thakor, and R. Benosman, “Hfirst: A temporal approach to object recogni- tion,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 2028–2040, 2015

2015
[40]

Deep spiking con- volutional neural network trained with unsupervised spike-timing- dependent plasticity,

C. Lee, G. Srinivasan, P. Panda, and K. Roy, “Deep spiking con- volutional neural network trained with unsupervised spike-timing- dependent plasticity,” IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Develop- mental Systems, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 384–394, 2018

2018
[41]

Theory and tools for the conversion of analog to spiking convolutional neural networks,

B. Rueckauer, I.-A. Lungu, Y . Hu, and M. Pfeiffer, “Theory and tools for the conversion of analog to spiking convolutional neural networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.04052 , 2016

2016 arXiv
[42]

Spiking deep convolutional neural networks for energy-efficient object recognition,

Y . Cao, Y . Chen, and D. Khosla, “Spiking deep convolutional neural networks for energy-efficient object recognition,” International Journal of Computer Vision , vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 54–66, 2015

2015
[43]

Simple framework for constructing functional spiking recurrent neural networks,

R. Kim, Y . Li, and T. J. Sejnowski, “Simple framework for constructing functional spiking recurrent neural networks,” Proceedings of the national academy of sciences , vol. 116, no. 45, pp. 22 811–22 820, 2019

2019
[44]

Long short-term memory spiking networks and their applications,

A. Lotfi Rezaabad and S. Vishwanath, “Long short-term memory spiking networks and their applications,” in International Conference on Neuromorphic Systems 2020 , 2020, pp. 1–9

2020
[45]

Effective and efficient compu- tation with multiple-timescale spiking recurrent neural networks,

B. Yin, F. Corradi, and S. M. Boht ´e, “Effective and efficient compu- tation with multiple-timescale spiking recurrent neural networks,” in International Conference on Neuromorphic Systems 2020 , 2020, pp. 1–8

2020
[46]

Sparse deep belief net model for visual area v2,

H. Lee, C. Ekanadham, and A. Ng, “Sparse deep belief net model for visual area v2,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 20, 2007

2007
[47]

Spiking convolutional deep belief networks,

J. Kaiser, D. Zimmerer, J. C. V . Tieck, S. Ulbrich, A. Roennau, and R. Dillmann, “Spiking convolutional deep belief networks,” in Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning–ICANN 2017: 26th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Alghero, Italy, September...

2017
[48]

Robustness of spiking deep belief networks to noise and reduced bit precision of neuro-inspired hardware platforms,

E. Stromatias, D. Neil, M. Pfeiffer, F. Galluppi, S. B. Furber, and S.-C. Liu, “Robustness of spiking deep belief networks to noise and reduced bit precision of neuro-inspired hardware platforms,” Frontiers in neuroscience, vol. 9, p. 141542, 2015

2015
[49]

Spikeprop: backpropa- gation for networks of spiking neurons

S. M. Bohte, J. N. Kok, and J. A. La Poutr ´e, “Spikeprop: backpropa- gation for networks of spiking neurons.” in ESANN, vol. 48. Bruges, 2000, pp. 419–424

2000
[50]

Fast modifications of the spikeprop algorithm,

S. McKennoch, D. Liu, and L. G. Bushnell, “Fast modifications of the spikeprop algorithm,” in The 2006 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network Proceedings . IEEE, 2006, pp. 3970–3977

2006
[51]

Training deep spiking neural networks using backpropagation,

J. H. Lee, T. Delbruck, and M. Pfeiffer, “Training deep spiking neural networks using backpropagation,” Frontiers in neuroscience , vol. 10, p. 508, 2016

2016
[52]

Unsupervised learning of visual fea- tures through spike timing dependent plasticity,

T. Masquelier and S. J. Thorpe, “Unsupervised learning of visual fea- tures through spike timing dependent plasticity,” PLoS computational biology, vol. 3, no. 2, p. e31, 2007

2007
[53]

Con- version of continuous-valued deep networks to efficient event-driven networks for image classification,

B. Rueckauer, I.-A. Lungu, Y . Hu, M. Pfeiffer, and S.-C. Liu, “Con- version of continuous-valued deep networks to efficient event-driven networks for image classification,” Frontiers in neuroscience, vol. 11, p. 682, 2017

2017
[54]

Spiking deep networks with lif neurons,

E. Hunsberger and C. Eliasmith, “Spiking deep networks with lif neurons,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.08829 , 2015

2015 arXiv
[55]

Nengo: a python tool for building large-scale functional brain models,

T. Bekolay, J. Bergstra, E. Hunsberger, T. DeWolf, T. C. Stewart, D. Rasmussen, X. Choo, A. R. V oelker, and C. Eliasmith, “Nengo: a python tool for building large-scale functional brain models,” Frontiers in neuroinformatics, vol. 7, p. 48, 2014

2014
[56]

Bindsnet: A machine learning-oriented spiking neural networks library in python,

H. Hazan, D. J. Saunders, H. Khan, D. Patel, D. T. Sanghavi, H. T. Siegelmann, and R. Kozma, “Bindsnet: A machine learning-oriented spiking neural networks library in python,” Frontiers in neuroinfor- matics, vol. 12, p. 89, 2018

2018
[57]

Truenorth: Design and tool flow of a 65 mw 1 million neuron programmable neurosynaptic chip,

F. Akopyan, J. Sawada, A. Cassidy, R. Alvarez-Icaza, J. Arthur, P. Merolla, N. Imam, Y . Nakamura, P. Datta, G.-J. Nam et al. , “Truenorth: Design and tool flow of a 65 mw 1 million neuron programmable neurosynaptic chip,” IEEE transactions on computer- aided design of integra...

2015
[58]

Loihi: A neuromorphic manycore processor with on-chip learning,

M. Davies, N. Srinivasa, T.-H. Lin, G. Chinya, Y . Cao, S. H. Choday, G. Dimou, P. Joshi, N. Imam, S. Jain et al. , “Loihi: A neuromorphic manycore processor with on-chip learning,” Ieee Micro, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 82–99, 2018

2018
[59]

Optimizing the energy consumption of spiking neural networks for neuromorphic applications,

M. Sorbaro, Q. Liu, M. Bortone, and S. Sheik, “Optimizing the energy consumption of spiking neural networks for neuromorphic applications,” Frontiers in neuroscience, vol. 14, p. 516916, 2020

2020
[60]

Synaptic activity and hardware footprint of spiking neural networks in digital neuromorphic systems,

E. Lemaire, B. Miramond, S. Bilavarn, H. Saoud, and N. Abderrah- mane, “Synaptic activity and hardware footprint of spiking neural networks in digital neuromorphic systems,” ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems , vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1–26, 2022

2022
[61]

Artificial intelligence and computer vision education: Codifying student learning gains and attitudes,

P. Abichandani, C. Iaboni, D. Lobo, and T. Kelly, “Artificial intelligence and computer vision education: Codifying student learning gains and attitudes,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence , vol. 5, p. 100159, 2023

2023
[62]

Which model to use for cortical spiking neurons?

E. M. Izhikevich, “Which model to use for cortical spiking neurons?” IEEE transactions on neural networks , vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1063–1070, 2004

2004
[63]

The discovery of the action potential,

S. M. Schuetze, “The discovery of the action potential,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 6, pp. 164–168, 1983

1983
[64]

Gerstner and W

W. Gerstner and W. M. Kistler, Spiking neuron models: Single neurons, populations, plasticity. Cambridge university press, 2002

2002
[65]

Synaptic vesicles and exocytosis,

R. Jahn and T. C. Sudhof, “Synaptic vesicles and exocytosis,” Annual review of neuroscience, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 219–246, 1994

1994
[66]

Presynaptic signaling by heterotrimeric g-proteins,

D. A. Brown and T. S. Sihra, “Presynaptic signaling by heterotrimeric g-proteins,” Pharmacology of neurotransmitter release , pp. 207–260, 2008

2008
[67]

E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz, T. M. Jessell, S. Siegelbaum, A. J. Hudspeth, S. Mack et al. , Principles of neural science . McGraw- hill New York, 2000, vol. 4

2000
[68]

Louis lapicque,

L. ´E. Lapicque, “Louis lapicque,” J. physiol, vol. 9, pp. 620–635, 1907

1907
[69]

A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve,

A. L. Hodgkin and A. F. Huxley, “A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve,” The Journal of physiology , vol. 117, no. 4, p. 500, 1952

1952
[70]

Dayan and L

P. Dayan and L. F. Abbott, Theoretical neuroscience: computational and mathematical modeling of neural systems . MIT press, 2005

2005
[72]

A high-performance neuron for artificial neural network based on izhikevich model,

M. Sapounaki and A. Kakarountas, “A high-performance neuron for artificial neural network based on izhikevich model,” in 2019 29th International Symposium on Power and Timing Modeling, Optimization and Simulation (PATMOS). IEEE, 2019, pp. 29–34

2019
[73]

On the capabilities and computational costs of neuron models,

M. J. Skocik and L. N. Long, “On the capabilities and computational costs of neuron models,” IEEE Transactions on neural networks and learning systems, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1474–1483, 2013

2013
[74]

Rmp-snn: Residual membrane potential neuron for enabling deeper high-accuracy and low-latency spiking neural network,

B. Han, G. Srinivasan, and K. Roy, “Rmp-snn: Residual membrane potential neuron for enabling deeper high-accuracy and low-latency spiking neural network,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2020, pp. 13 558–13 567

2020
[75]

Event-driven spiking neural network based on membrane potential modulation for remote sensing image classification,

L.-Y . Niu, Y . Wei, and Y . Liu, “Event-driven spiking neural network based on membrane potential modulation for remote sensing image classification,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence , vol. 123, p. 106322, 2023

2023
[76]

Fast-classifying, high-accuracy spiking deep networks through weight and threshold balancing,

P. U. Diehl, D. Neil, J. Binas, M. Cook, S.-C. Liu, and M. Pfeiffer, “Fast-classifying, high-accuracy spiking deep networks through weight and threshold balancing,” in 2015 International joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN) . ieee, 2015, pp. 1–8

2015
[77]

An event-driven classifier for spiking neural networks fed with synthetic or dynamic vision sensor data,

E. Stromatias, M. Soto, T. Serrano-Gotarredona, and B. Linares- Barranco, “An event-driven classifier for spiking neural networks fed with synthetic or dynamic vision sensor data,” Frontiers in neuro- science, vol. 11, p. 350, 2017

2017
[78]

Poisson model of spike generation,

D. Heeger et al. , “Poisson model of spike generation,” Handout, University of Standford , vol. 5, no. 1-13, p. 76, 2000

2000
[79]

Stdp-based spiking deep convolutional neural networks for object recognition,

S. R. Kheradpisheh, M. Ganjtabesh, S. J. Thorpe, and T. Masquelier, “Stdp-based spiking deep convolutional neural networks for object recognition,” Neural Networks, vol. 99, pp. 56–67, 2018

2018
[80]

A dynamic vision sensor with 1% temporal contrast sensitivity and in-pixel asynchronous delta modulator for event encoding,

M. Yang, S.-C. Liu, and T. Delbruck, “A dynamic vision sensor with 1% temporal contrast sensitivity and in-pixel asynchronous delta modulator for event encoding,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits , vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 2149–2160, 2015

2015
[81]

Temporal-coded deep spiking neural network with easy training and robust performance,

S. Zhou, X. Li, Y . Chen, S. T. Chandrasekaran, and A. Sanyal, “Temporal-coded deep spiking neural network with easy training and robust performance,” in Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 35, no. 12, 2021, pp. 11 143–11 151

2021
[82]

Neural population coding for effective temporal classification,

Z. Pan, J. Wu, M. Zhang, H. Li, and Y . Chua, “Neural population coding for effective temporal classification,” in2019 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) . IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–8

2019
[83]

A 128x128 120db 15 µs latency asynchronous temporal contrast vision sensor,

P. Lichtensteiner, C. Posch, and T. Delbruck, “A 128x128 120db 15 µs latency asynchronous temporal contrast vision sensor,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits , no. 2, pp. 566–576, 2008

2008
[84]

A qvga 143 db dynamic range frame-free pwm image sensor with lossless pixel-level video compression and time-domain cds,

C. Posch, D. Matolin, and R. Wohlgenannt, “A qvga 143 db dynamic range frame-free pwm image sensor with lossless pixel-level video compression and time-domain cds,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Cir- cuits, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 259–275, 2010

2010
[85]

A 240 × 180 130 db 3 µs latency global shutter spatiotemporal vision sensor,

C. Brandli, R. Berner, M. Yang, S.-C. Liu, and T. Delbruck, “A 240 × 180 130 db 3 µs latency global shutter spatiotemporal vision sensor,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits , vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 2333–2341, 2014

2014
[86]

4.1 a 640 × 480 dynamic vision sensor with a 9µm pixel and 300meps address-event representation,

B. Son, Y . Suh, S. Kim, H. Jung, J.-S. Kim, C. Shin, K. Park, K. Lee, J. Park, J. Woo et al., “4.1 a 640 × 480 dynamic vision sensor with a 9µm pixel and 300meps address-event representation,” in 2017 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC) . IEEE, 2017, pp. 66–67

2017
[87]

Event- based vision: A survey,

G. Gallego, T. Delbr ¨uck, G. Orchard, C. Bartolozzi, B. Taba, A. Censi, S. Leutenegger, A. J. Davison, J. Conradt, K. Daniilidis et al., “Event- based vision: A survey,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 154–180, 2020

2020
[88]

Microsaccade-inspired event camera for robotics,

B. He, Z. Wang, Y . Zhou, J. Chen, C. D. Singh, H. Li, Y . Gao, S. Shen, K. Wang, Y . Cao et al., “Microsaccade-inspired event camera for robotics,” Science Robotics, vol. 9, no. 90, p. eadj8124, 2024

2024
[89]

The mnist database of handwritten digit images for machine learning research,

L. Deng, “The mnist database of handwritten digit images for machine learning research,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine , vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 141–142, 2012

2012
[90]

H. Xiao, K. Rasul, and R. V ollgraf. (2017) Fashion-mnist: a novel image dataset for benchmarking machine learning algorithms

2017
[91]

Learning generative visual models from few training examples: An incremental bayesian approach tested on 101 object categories,

L. Fei-Fei, R. Fergus, and P. Perona, “Learning generative visual models from few training examples: An incremental bayesian approach tested on 101 object categories,” Computer Vision and Pattern Recog- nition Workshop, 2004

2004
[92]

Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images,

A. Krizhevsky, G. Hinton et al., “Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images,” 2009

2009
[93]

Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database,

J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L.-J. Li, K. Li, and L. Fei-Fei, “Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database,” in 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2009, pp. 248–255

2009
[94]

Converting static image datasets to spiking neuromorphic datasets using saccades,

G. Orchard, A. Jayawant, G. K. Cohen, and N. Thakor, “Converting static image datasets to spiking neuromorphic datasets using saccades,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 9, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2015.00437

2015
[95]

A 128x128 1.5% contrast sensitivity 0.9% fpn 3 µs latency 4 mw asynchronous frame- free dynamic vision sensor using transimpedance preamplifiers,

T. Serrano-Gotarredona and B. Linares-Barranco, “A 128x128 1.5% contrast sensitivity 0.9% fpn 3 µs latency 4 mw asynchronous frame- free dynamic vision sensor using transimpedance preamplifiers,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits , vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 827–838, 2013

2013
[96]

Mapping from frame- driven to frame-free event-driven vision systems by low-rate rate- coding and coincidence processing. application to feed forward con- vnets,

J. P ´erez-Carrasco, B. Zhao, C. Serrano, B. Acha, T. Serrano- Gotarredona, S. Chen, and B. Linares-Barranco, “Mapping from frame- driven to frame-free event-driven vision systems by low-rate rate- coding and coincidence processing. application to feed forward con- vnets,” IEE...

2013
[97]

Efficient feedforward categorization of objects and human postures with address-event image sensors,

S. Chen, P. Akselrod, B. Zhao, J. A. Perez Carrasco, B. Linares- Barranco, and E. Culurciello, “Efficient feedforward categorization of objects and human postures with address-event image sensors,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , vol. 34, no. 2...

2012
[98]

Neuromorphic benchmark datasets for pedestrian detection, action recognition, and fall detection,

S. Miao, G. Chen, X. Ning, Y . Zi, K. Ren, Z. Bing, and A. C. Knoll, “Neuromorphic benchmark datasets for pedestrian detection, action recognition, and fall detection,” Frontiers in neurorobotics , vol. 13, p. 38, 2019

2019
[99]

Hats: Histograms of averaged time surfaces for robust event-based ob- ject classification,

A. Sironi, M. Brambilla, N. Bourdis, X. Lagorce, and R. Benosman, “Hats: Histograms of averaged time surfaces for robust event-based ob- ject classification,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2018, pp. 1731–1740

2018
[100]

A large scale event-based detection dataset for automotive,

P. De Tournemire, D. Nitti, E. Perot, D. Migliore, and A. Sironi, “A large scale event-based detection dataset for automotive,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08499, 2020

2001 arXiv
[101]

Learning to detect objects with a 1 megapixel event camera,

E. Perot, P. De Tournemire, D. Nitti, J. Masci, and A. Sironi, “Learning to detect objects with a 1 megapixel event camera,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 33, pp. 16 639–16 652, 2020

2020
[102]

Ev-imo: Motion segmentation dataset and learning pipeline for event cameras,

A. Mitrokhin, C. Ye, C. Ferm ¨uller, Y . Aloimonos, and T. Delbruck, “Ev-imo: Motion segmentation dataset and learning pipeline for event cameras,” in 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) . IEEE, 2019, pp. 6105–6112

2019
[103]

Sodformer: Streaming object detection with transformer using events and frames,

D. Li, J. Li, and Y . Tian, “Sodformer: Streaming object detection with transformer using events and frames,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 2023

2023
[104]

Ddd17: End-to-end davis driving dataset,

J. Binas, D. Neil, S.-C. Liu, and T. Delbruck, “Ddd17: End-to-end davis driving dataset,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.01458 , 2017

2017 arXiv
[105]

Scene context classification with event-driven spiking deep neural networks,

P. Negri, M. Soto, B. Linares-Barranco, and T. Serrano-Gotarredona, “Scene context classification with event-driven spiking deep neural networks,” in 2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems (ICECS) , 2018, pp. 569–572

2018
[106]

A low power, fully event-based gesture recognition system,

A. Amir, B. Taba, D. J. Berg, T. Melano, J. L. McKinstry, C. di Nolfo, T. K. Nayak, A. Andreopoulos, G. Garreau, M. Mendoza, J. A. Kusnitz, M. V . DeBole, S. K. Esser, T. Delbr ¨uck, M. Flickner, and D. S. Modha, “A low power, fully event-based gesture recognition system,” 201...

2017
[107]

Introduction and analysis of an event-based sign lan- guage dataset,

A. Vasudevan, P. Negri, B. Linares-Barranco, and T. Serrano- Gotarredona, “Introduction and analysis of an event-based sign lan- guage dataset,” in 2020 15th IEEE International Conference on Au- tomatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG 2020) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 675–682

2020
[108]

Pred18: Dataset and further experiments with davis event camera in predator-prey robot chasing,

D. P. Moeys, D. Neil, F. Corradi, E. Kerr, P. Vance, G. Das, S. A. Coleman, T. M. McGinnity, D. Kerr, and T. Delbruck, “Pred18: Dataset and further experiments with davis event camera in predator-prey robot chasing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03128 , 2018. [Online]. Available:...

2018 arXiv
[109]

Nu-air–a neuromorphic urban aerial dataset for detection and localization of pedestrians and vehicles,

C. Iaboni, T. Kelly, and P. Abichandani, “Nu-air–a neuromorphic urban aerial dataset for detection and localization of pedestrians and vehicles,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.09429 , 2023

2023 arXiv
[110]

Event camera based real-time detection and tracking of indoor ground robots,

C. Iaboni, H. Patel, D. Lobo, J.-W. Choi, and P. Abichandani, “Event camera based real-time detection and tracking of indoor ground robots,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 166 588–166 602, 2021

2021
[111]

Event-based motion capture system for online multi-quadrotor localization and tracking,

C. Iaboni, D. Lobo, J.-W. Choi, and P. Abichandani, “Event-based motion capture system for online multi-quadrotor localization and tracking,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 9, p. 3240, 2022

2022
[112]

ESIM: an open event camera simulator,

H. Rebecq, D. Gehrig, and D. Scaramuzza, “ESIM: an open event camera simulator,” Conf. on Robotics Learning (CoRL) , Oct. 2018

2018
[113]

Interiornet: Mega-scale multi- sensor photo-realistic indoor scenes dataset,

W. Li, S. Saeedi, J. McCormac, R. Clark, D. Tzoumanikas, Q. Ye, Y . Huang, R. Tang, and S. Leutenegger, “Interiornet: Mega-scale multi- sensor photo-realistic indoor scenes dataset,” 2018

2018
[114]

Towards a framework for end-to-end control of a simulated vehicle with spiking neural networks,

J. Kaiser, J. C. Vasquez Tieck, C. Hubschneider, P. Wolf, M. Weber, M. Hoff, A. Friedrich, K. Wojtasik, A. Roennau, R. Kohlhaas, R. Dill- mann, and J. M. Z ¨ollner, “Towards a framework for end-to-end control of a simulated vehicle with spiking neural networks,” in 2016 IEEE I...

2016
[115]

Pix2nvs: Parameterized conversion of pixel-domain video frames to neuromorphic vision streams,

Y . Bi and Y . Andreopoulos, “Pix2nvs: Parameterized conversion of pixel-domain video frames to neuromorphic vision streams,” in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) . IEEE, 2017, pp. 1990–1994

2017
[116]

pydvs: An extensible, real-time dynamic vision sensor emulator using off-the-shelf hardware,

G. P. Garc ´ıa, P. Camilleri, Q. Liu, and S. Furber, “pydvs: An extensible, real-time dynamic vision sensor emulator using off-the-shelf hardware,” in 2016 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI). IEEE, 2016, pp. 1–7

2016
[117]

Video to events: Recycling video datasets for event cameras,

D. Gehrig, M. Gehrig, J. Hidalgo-Carri ´o, and D. Scaramuzza, “Video to events: Recycling video datasets for event cameras,” in2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , 2020, pp. 3583–3592

2020
[118]

v2e: From video frames to realistic dvs events,

Y . Hu, S.-C. Liu, and T. Delbruck, “v2e: From video frames to realistic dvs events,” in 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 2021, pp. 1312–1321

2021
[119]

Slayer: Spike layer error reassignment in time,

S. B. Shrestha and G. Orchard, “Slayer: Spike layer error reassignment in time,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 31, 2018

2018
[120]

Effective aer object classification using segmented probability-maximization learning in spiking neural networks,

Q. Liu, H. Ruan, D. Xing, H. Tang, and G. Pan, “Effective aer object classification using segmented probability-maximization learning in spiking neural networks,” in Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 34, no. 02, 2020, pp. 1308–1315

2020
[121]

Event-driven implementation of deep spiking convolutional neural networks for supervised classification using the spinnaker neuromorphic platform,

A. Pati ˜no-Saucedo, H. Rostro-Gonzalez, T. Serrano-Gotarredona, and B. Linares-Barranco, “Event-driven implementation of deep spiking convolutional neural networks for supervised classification using the spinnaker neuromorphic platform,”Neural Networks, vol. 121, pp. 319– 328, 2020

2020
[122]

Spatio-temporal back- propagation for training high-performance spiking neural networks,

Y . Wu, L. Deng, G. Li, J. Zhu, and L. Shi, “Spatio-temporal back- propagation for training high-performance spiking neural networks,” Frontiers in neuroscience, vol. 12, p. 331, 2018

2018
[123]

Direct training for spiking neural networks: Faster, larger, better,

Y . Wu, L. Deng, G. Li, J. Zhu, Y . Xie, and L. Shi, “Direct training for spiking neural networks: Faster, larger, better,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , vol. 33, no. 01, 2019, pp. 1311–1318

2019
[124]

Attention mechanisms for object recognition with event-based cameras,

M. Cannici, M. Ciccone, A. Romanoni, and M. Matteucci, “Attention mechanisms for object recognition with event-based cameras,” in 2019 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) . IEEE, 2019, pp. 1127–1136

2019
[125]

An efficient learning algorithm for direct training deep spiking neural networks,

X. Zhu, B. Zhao, D. Ma, and H. Tang, “An efficient learning algorithm for direct training deep spiking neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems , 2021

2021
[126]

Deep representation via convolutional neural network for classification of spatiotemporal event streams,

H. Li, G. Li, X. Ji, and L. Shi, “Deep representation via convolutional neural network for classification of spatiotemporal event streams,” Neurocomputing, vol. 299, pp. 1–9, 2018

2018
[127]

Deep residual learning in spiking neural networks,

W. Fang, Z. Yu, Y . Chen, T. Huang, T. Masquelier, and Y . Tian, “Deep residual learning in spiking neural networks,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 34, pp. 21 056–21 069, 2021

2021
[128]

Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks,

A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, “Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 84–90, 2017

2017
[129]

Spiking neural networks vs convolutional neural networks for supervised learning,

S. Lamba and R. Lamba, “Spiking neural networks vs convolutional neural networks for supervised learning,” in 2019 International Confer- ence on Computing, Communication, and Intelligent Systems (ICCCIS). IEEE, 2019, pp. 15–19

2019
[130]

Converting static image datasets to spiking neuromorphic datasets using saccades,

G. Orchard, A. Jayawant, G. K. Cohen, and N. Thakor, “Converting static image datasets to spiking neuromorphic datasets using saccades,” Frontiers in neuroscience, vol. 9, p. 437, 2015

2015
[131]

Control and evaluation of event cameras output sharpness via bias,

M. S. Dilmaghani, W. Shariff, C. Ryan, J. Lemley, and P. Corcoran, “Control and evaluation of event cameras output sharpness via bias,” in Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Vision (ICMV 2022), vol. 12701. SPIE, 2023, pp. 455–462

2022
[132]

Cifar10-dvs: An event-stream dataset for object classification,

H. Li, H. Liu, X. Ji, G. Li, and L. Shi, “Cifar10-dvs: An event-stream dataset for object classification,” Frontiers in Neuroscience , vol. 11,
[133]

Microsaccades: A microcosm for research on oculomotor control, attention, and visual perception,

R. Engbert, “Microsaccades: A microcosm for research on oculomotor control, attention, and visual perception,” Progress in brain research , vol. 154, pp. 177–192, 2006

2006
[134]

High-temporal-resolution object detection and tracking using images and events,

Z. El Shair and S. A. Rawashdeh, “High-temporal-resolution object detection and tracking using images and events,” Journal of Imaging , vol. 8, no. 8, p. 210, 2022

2022
[135]

How to calibrate your event camera,

M. Muglikar, M. Gehrig, D. Gehrig, and D. Scaramuzza, “How to calibrate your event camera,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2021, pp. 1403–1409

2021
[136]

Nest: An environment for neural systems simulations,

M. Diesmann and M.-O. Gewaltig, “Nest: An environment for neural systems simulations,” Forschung und wisschenschaftliches Rechnen, Beitr¨age zum Heinz-Billing-Preis , vol. 58, pp. 43–70, 2001

2001
[137]

The neuron simulation environ- ment,

M. L. Hines and N. T. Carnevale, “The neuron simulation environ- ment,” Neural computation, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1179–1209, 1997

1997
[138]

Brian: a simulator for spiking neural networks in python,

D. F. Goodman and R. Brette, “Brian: a simulator for spiking neural networks in python,”Frontiers in neuroinformatics, vol. 2, p. 350, 2008

2008
[139]

Spikingjelly: An open-source machine learning infrastructure platform for spike-based intelligence,

W. Fang, Y . Chen, J. Ding, Z. Yu, T. Masquelier, D. Chen, L. Huang, H. Zhou, G. Li, and Y . Tian, “Spikingjelly: An open-source machine learning infrastructure platform for spike-based intelligence,” Science Advances, vol. 9, no. 40, p. eadi1480, 2023

2023
[140]

Nxtf: An api and compiler for deep spiking neural networks on intel loihi,

B. Rueckauer, C. Bybee, R. Goettsche, Y . Singh, J. Mishra, and A. Wild, “Nxtf: An api and compiler for deep spiking neural networks on intel loihi,” ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems (JETC), vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1–22, 2022

2022
[141]

The event-camera dataset and simulator: Event-based data for pose estimation, visual odometry, and slam,

E. Mueggler, H. Rebecq, G. Gallego, T. Delbruck, and D. Scaramuzza, “The event-camera dataset and simulator: Event-based data for pose estimation, visual odometry, and slam,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 142–149, 2017

2017
[142]

Design and use paradigms for gazebo, an open-source multi-robot simulator,

N. Koenig and A. Howard, “Design and use paradigms for gazebo, an open-source multi-robot simulator,” in 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)(IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37566), vol. 3. IEEE, 2004, pp. 2149–2154

2004
[143]

Super slomo: High quality estimation of multiple inter- mediate frames for video interpolation,

H. Jiang, D. Sun, V . Jampani, M.-H. Yang, E. Learned-Miller, and J. Kautz, “Super slomo: High quality estimation of multiple inter- mediate frames for video interpolation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2018, pp. 9000–9008

2018
[144]

Event- based object detection and tracking for space situational awareness,

S. Afshar, A. P. Nicholson, A. van Schaik, and G. Cohen, “Event- based object detection and tracking for space situational awareness,” IEEE Sensors Journal , vol. 20, no. 24, pp. 15 117–15 132, 2020

2020
[145]

Event camera simulator improvements via characterized parameters,

D. Joubert, A. Marcireau, N. Ralph, A. Jolley, A. van Schaik, and G. Cohen, “Event camera simulator improvements via characterized parameters,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, p. 910, 2021

2021
[146]

The backward euler method for numerical solution of the hodgkin–huxley equations of nerve conduction,

M. Mascagni, “The backward euler method for numerical solution of the hodgkin–huxley equations of nerve conduction,” SIAM journal on numerical analysis, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 941–962, 1990

1990
[147]

Numerical methods for neuronal modeling,

M. V . Mascagni, A. S. Sherman et al., “Numerical methods for neuronal modeling,” Methods in neuronal modeling , vol. 2, 1989

1989
[148]

Automatic differenti- ation in pytorch,

A. Paszke, S. Gross, S. Chintala, G. Chanan, E. Yang, Z. DeVito, Z. Lin, A. Desmaison, L. Antiga, and A. Lerer, “Automatic differenti- ation in pytorch,” 2017

2017
[149]

TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems,

M. Abadi, A. Agarwal, P. Barham, E. Brevdo, Z. Chen et al. , “TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems,” 2015, software available from tensorflow.org. [Online]. Available: http://tensorflow.org/

2015
[150]

Norse - A deep learning library for spiking neural networks,

C.-G. Pehle and J. E. Pedersen, “Norse - A deep learning library for spiking neural networks,” Jan. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4422025

2021 doi
[151]

A technical overview of the neural engineering frame- work,

T. C. Stewart, “A technical overview of the neural engineering frame- work,” University of Waterloo, vol. 110, 2012

2012
[152]

Chollet et al

F. Chollet et al. (2015) Keras. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/ fchollet/keras

2015
[153]

Lasagne: First release

S. Dieleman, J. Schl ¨uter, C. Raffel, E. Olson, S. K. Sønderby, D. Nouri et al. , “Lasagne: First release.” Aug. 2015. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.27878

2015 doi
[154]

Caffe: Convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding,

Y . Jia, E. Shelhamer, J. Donahue, S. Karayev, J. Long, R. Girshick, S. Guadarrama, and T. Darrell, “Caffe: Convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1408.5093 , 2014

2014 arXiv
[155]

Overview of the spinnaker system architecture,

S. B. Furber, D. R. Lester, L. A. Plana, J. D. Garside, E. Painkras, S. Temple, and A. D. Brown, “Overview of the spinnaker system architecture,” IEEE transactions on computers , vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 2454–2467, 2012

2012
[156]

Lava project,

Intel Neuromorphic Computing Lab (NCL), “Lava project,” https:// lava-nc.org, 2024, online; accessed 31 May 2024

2024
[157]

The brainscales-2 accelerated neuromorphic system with hybrid plasticity,

C. Pehle, S. Billaudelle, B. Cramer, J. Kaiser, K. Schreiber, Y . Strad- mann, J. Weis, A. Leibfried, E. M ¨uller, and J. Schemmel, “The brainscales-2 accelerated neuromorphic system with hybrid plasticity,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 16, p. 795876, 2022

2022
[158]

Tianjic: A unified and scalable chip bridging spike-based and continuous neural computation,

L. Deng, G. Wang, G. Li, S. Li, L. Liang, M. Zhu, Y . Wu, Z. Yang, Z. Zou, J. Pei et al. , “Tianjic: A unified and scalable chip bridging spike-based and continuous neural computation,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 2228–2246, 2020

2020
[159]

Intelligence processing units accelerate neuromorphic learning,

P.-S. V . Sun, A. Titterton, A. Gopiani, T. Santos, A. Basu, W. D. Lu, and J. K. Eshraghian, “Intelligence processing units accelerate neuromorphic learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.10725 , 2022

2022 arXiv
[160]

Cuda, release: 10.2.89,

NVIDIA, P. Vingelmann, and F. H. Fitzek, “Cuda, release: 10.2.89,”
[161]

Cupy: A numpy-compatible library for nvidia gpu calculations,

R. Nishino and S. H. C. Loomis, “Cupy: A numpy-compatible library for nvidia gpu calculations,” 31st confernce on neural information processing systems, vol. 151, no. 7, 2017

2017
[162]

Memory and information processing in neuromorphic systems,

G. Indiveri and S.-C. Liu, “Memory and information processing in neuromorphic systems,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 103, no. 8, pp. 1379–1397, 2015

2015
[163]

Deep learning for medical image segmentation–using the ibm truenorth neurosynaptic system,

S. Moran, B. Gaonkar, W. Whitehead, A. Wolk, L. Macyszyn, and S. S. Iyer, “Deep learning for medical image segmentation–using the ibm truenorth neurosynaptic system,” in Medical Imaging 2018: Imaging Informatics for Healthcare, Research, and Applications , vol. 10579. SPIE, 20...

2018
[164]

Spiking optical flow for event-based sensors using ibm’s truenorth neurosynaptic system,

G. Haessig, A. Cassidy, R. Alvarez, R. Benosman, and G. Orchard, “Spiking optical flow for event-based sensors using ibm’s truenorth neurosynaptic system,” IEEE transactions on biomedical circuits and systems, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 860–870, 2018

2018
[165]

Investi- gating current-based and gating approaches for accurate and energy- efficient spiking recurrent neural networks,

M. Dampfhoffer, T. Mesquida, A. Valentian, and L. Anghel, “Investi- gating current-based and gating approaches for accurate and energy- efficient spiking recurrent neural networks,” in International Confer- ence on Artificial Neural Networks . Springer, 2022, pp. 359–370

2022
[166]

Generating coherent patterns of activity from chaotic neural networks,

D. Sussillo and L. F. Abbott, “Generating coherent patterns of activity from chaotic neural networks,” Neuron, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 544–557, 2009

2009
[167]

Dynamics and computation of continuous attractors,

S. Wu, K. Hamaguchi, and S.-i. Amari, “Dynamics and computation of continuous attractors,” Neural computation, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 994– 1025, 2008

2008
[168]

Hierarchical chunking of sequential memory on neuromorphic architecture with reduced synaptic plasticity,

G. Li, L. Deng, D. Wang, W. Wang, F. Zeng, Z. Zhang, H. Li, S. Song, J. Pei, and L. Shi, “Hierarchical chunking of sequential memory on neuromorphic architecture with reduced synaptic plasticity,” Frontiers in computational neuroscience , vol. 10, p. 136, 2016

2016
[169]

A critical review of recurrent neural networks for sequence learning,

Z. C. Lipton, “A critical review of recurrent neural networks for sequence learning,” arXiv Preprint, CoRR, abs/1506.00019 , 2015

2015 arXiv
[170]

Unsu- pervised visual feature learning with spike-timing-dependent plasticity: How far are we from traditional feature learning approaches?

P. Falez, P. Tirilly, I. M. Bilasco, P. Devienne, and P. Boulet, “Unsu- pervised visual feature learning with spike-timing-dependent plasticity: How far are we from traditional feature learning approaches?” Pattern Recognition, vol. 93, pp. 418–429, 2019

2019
[171]

Extraction of temporally correlated features from dynamic vision sen- sors with spike-timing-dependent plasticity,

O. Bichler, D. Querlioz, S. J. Thorpe, J.-P. Bourgoin, and C. Gamrat, “Extraction of temporally correlated features from dynamic vision sen- sors with spike-timing-dependent plasticity,” Neural networks, vol. 32, pp. 339–348, 2012

2012
[172]

Stdp enables spiking neurons to detect hidden causes of their inputs,

B. Nessler, M. Pfeiffer, and W. Maass, “Stdp enables spiking neurons to detect hidden causes of their inputs,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 22, 2009

2009
[173]

Acquisition of visual features through probabilistic spike-timing-dependent plasticity,

A. Tavanaei, T. Masquelier, and A. S. Maida, “Acquisition of visual features through probabilistic spike-timing-dependent plasticity,” in 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) . IEEE, 2016, pp. 307–314

2016
[174]

First-spike-based visual categorization using reward-modulated stdp,

M. Mozafari, S. R. Kheradpisheh, T. Masquelier, A. Nowzari-Dalini, and M. Ganjtabesh, “First-spike-based visual categorization using reward-modulated stdp,” IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 6178–6190, 2018

2018
[175]

Brain inspired sequences production by spiking neural networks with reward-modulated stdp,

H. Fang, Y . Zeng, and F. Zhao, “Brain inspired sequences production by spiking neural networks with reward-modulated stdp,” Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, vol. 15, p. 612041, 2021

2021
[176]

Combining stdp and binary networks for reinforcement learning from images and sparse rewards,

S. F. Chevtchenko and T. B. Ludermir, “Combining stdp and binary networks for reinforcement learning from images and sparse rewards,” Neural Networks, vol. 144, pp. 496–506, 2021

2021
[177]

Depression-biased reverse plasticity rule is required for stable learning at top-down connections,

K. S. Burbank and G. Kreiman, “Depression-biased reverse plasticity rule is required for stable learning at top-down connections,” PLoS computational biology, vol. 8, no. 3, p. e1002393, 2012

2012
[178]

Spike timing-dependent plasticity: a hebbian learning rule,

N. Caporale, Y . Dan et al. , “Spike timing-dependent plasticity: a hebbian learning rule,” Annual review of neuroscience , vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 25–46, 2008

2008
[179]

Modified stdp triplet rule significantly increases neuron training stability in the learning of spatial patterns,

D. Krunglevicius, “Modified stdp triplet rule significantly increases neuron training stability in the learning of spatial patterns,” Advances in Artificial Neural Systems , vol. 2016, 2016

2016
[180]

Supervised learning with spiking neural networks,

J. Xin and M. J. Embrechts, “Supervised learning with spiking neural networks,” in IJCNN’01. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Proceedings (Cat. No. 01CH37222) , vol. 3. IEEE, 2001, pp. 1772–1777

2001
[181]

Temporal backpropagation for spiking neural networks with one spike per neuron,

S. R. Kheradpisheh and T. Masquelier, “Temporal backpropagation for spiking neural networks with one spike per neuron,” International Journal of Neural Systems , vol. 30, no. 06, p. 2050027, 2020

2020
[182]

The tempotron: a neuron that learns spike timing–based decisions,

R. G ¨utig and H. Sompolinsky, “The tempotron: a neuron that learns spike timing–based decisions,” Nature neuroscience, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 420–428, 2006

2006
[183]

Supervised learning in spiking neural networks with force training,

W. Nicola and C. Clopath, “Supervised learning in spiking neural networks with force training,” Nature communications, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 2208, 2017

2017
[184]

Superspike: Supervised learning in multi- layer spiking neural networks,

F. Zenke and S. Ganguli, “Superspike: Supervised learning in multi- layer spiking neural networks,” Neural computation, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1514–1541, 2018

2018
[185]

Surrogate gradient learning in spiking neural networks: Bringing the power of gradient-based optimization to spiking neural networks,

E. O. Neftci, H. Mostafa, and F. Zenke, “Surrogate gradient learning in spiking neural networks: Bringing the power of gradient-based optimization to spiking neural networks,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 51–63, 2019

2019
[186]

Enabling spike-based backpropagation for training deep neural network archi- tectures,

C. Lee, S. S. Sarwar, P. Panda, G. Srinivasan, and K. Roy, “Enabling spike-based backpropagation for training deep neural network archi- tectures,” Frontiers in neuroscience, p. 119, 2020

2020
[187]

D. O. Hebb, The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. Psychology Press, 2005

2005
[188]

A critical survey of stdp in spiking neural networks for pattern recognition,

A. Vigneron and J. Martinet, “A critical survey of stdp in spiking neural networks for pattern recognition,” in 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–9

2020
[189]

Hierarchical bayesian inference and learning in spiking neural networks,

S. Guo, Z. Yu, F. Deng, X. Hu, and F. Chen, “Hierarchical bayesian inference and learning in spiking neural networks,” IEEE transactions on cybernetics, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 133–145, 2017

2017
[190]

Unsupervised learning of a hierarchical spiking neural network for optical flow esti- mation: From events to global motion perception,

F. Paredes-Vall ´es, K. Y . Scheper, and G. C. De Croon, “Unsupervised learning of a hierarchical spiking neural network for optical flow esti- mation: From events to global motion perception,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , vol. 42, no. 8, pp...

2019
[191]

Mirrored stdp implements autoencoder learning in a network of spiking neurons,

K. S. Burbank, “Mirrored stdp implements autoencoder learning in a network of spiking neurons,” PLoS computational biology , vol. 11, no. 12, p. e1004566, 2015

2015
[192]

Understanding dopamine and reinforcement learning: the dopamine reward prediction error hypothesis,

P. W. Glimcher, “Understanding dopamine and reinforcement learning: the dopamine reward prediction error hypothesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 108, no. supplement 3, pp. 15 647– 15 654, 2011

2011
[193]

Td ( λ) networks: temporal-difference net- works with eligibility traces,

B. Tanner and R. S. Sutton, “Td ( λ) networks: temporal-difference net- works with eligibility traces,” in Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Machine learning , 2005, pp. 888–895

2005
[194]

The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?

M. D. Hauser, N. Chomsky, and W. T. Fitch, “The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?” science, vol. 298, no. 5598, pp. 1569–1579, 2002

2002
[195]

Primacy-recency in impression formation,

A. S. Luchins, “Primacy-recency in impression formation,” The order of presentation in persuasion , vol. 1, pp. 33–61, 1957

1957
[196]

Production of supra-regular spatial sequences by macaque monkeys,

X. Jiang, T. Long, W. Cao, J. Li, S. Dehaene, and L. Wang, “Production of supra-regular spatial sequences by macaque monkeys,” Current Biology, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 1851–1859, 2018

2018
[197]

Rate, timing, and cooperativity jointly determine cortical synaptic plasticity,

P. J. Sj ¨ostr¨om, G. G. Turrigiano, and S. B. Nelson, “Rate, timing, and cooperativity jointly determine cortical synaptic plasticity,”Neuron, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1149–1164, 2001

2001
[198]

The role of weight normalization in competitive learning,

G. J. Goodhill and H. G. Barrow, “The role of weight normalization in competitive learning,” Neural Computation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 255–269, 1994

1994
[199]

Improving stdp-based visual fea- ture learning with whitening,

P. Falez, P. Tirilly, and I. M. Bilasco, “Improving stdp-based visual fea- ture learning with whitening,” in 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–8

2020
[200]

An imbalanced r-stdp learning rule in spiking neural networks for medical image classification,

Q. Zhou, C. Ren, and S. Qi, “An imbalanced r-stdp learning rule in spiking neural networks for medical image classification,”IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 224 162–224 177, 2020

2020
[201]

Whetstone: A method for training deep artificial neural networks for binary communication,

W. Severa, C. M. Vineyard, R. Dellana, S. J. Verzi, and J. B. Aimone, “Whetstone: A method for training deep artificial neural networks for binary communication,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.11521 , 2018

2018 arXiv
[202]

Going deeper in spiking neural networks: Vgg and residual architectures,

A. Sengupta, Y . Ye, R. Wang, C. Liu, and K. Roy, “Going deeper in spiking neural networks: Vgg and residual architectures,” Frontiers in neuroscience, vol. 13, p. 95, 2019

2019
[203]

Optimal conversion of conventional artifi- cial neural networks to spiking neural networks,

S. Deng and S. Gu, “Optimal conversion of conventional artifi- cial neural networks to spiking neural networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.00476, 2021

2021 arXiv
[204]

Optimal ann-snn conversion for fast and accurate inference in deep spiking neural networks,

J. Ding, Z. Yu, Y . Tian, and T. Huang, “Optimal ann-snn conversion for fast and accurate inference in deep spiking neural networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.11654, 2021

2021 arXiv
[205]

A spiking neural network for image segmentation,

K. Patel, E. Hunsberger, S. Batir, and C. Eliasmith, “A spiking neural network for image segmentation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.08921 , 2021

2021 arXiv
[206]

Learning long-term dependen- cies with gradient descent is difficult,

Y . Bengio, P. Simard, and P. Frasconi, “Learning long-term dependen- cies with gradient descent is difficult,” IEEE transactions on neural networks, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 157–166, 1994

1994
[207]

Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks,

X. Glorot and Y . Bengio, “Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks,” in Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics. JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings, 2010, pp. 249–256

2010
[208]

Synthesis of neural networks for spatio-temporal spike pattern recognition and processing,

J. C. Tapson, G. K. Cohen, S. Afshar, K. M. Stiefel, Y . Buskila, T. J. Hamilton, and A. van Schaik, “Synthesis of neural networks for spatio-temporal spike pattern recognition and processing,” Frontiers in neuroscience, p. 153, 2013

2013
[209]

Online spatio- temporal pattern recognition with evolving spiking neural networks utilising address event representation, rank order, and temporal spike learning,

K. Dhoble, N. Nuntalid, G. Indiveri, and N. Kasabov, “Online spatio- temporal pattern recognition with evolving spiking neural networks utilising address event representation, rank order, and temporal spike learning,” in The 2012 international joint conference on Neural net- w...

2012
[210]

Dy- namic spike bundling for energy-efficient spiking neural networks,

S. Krithivasan, S. Sen, S. Venkataramani, and A. Raghunathan, “Dy- namic spike bundling for energy-efficient spiking neural networks,” in 2019 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design (ISLPED) . IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–6

2019
[211]

Spike-timing-dependent plasticity in balanced random networks,

A. Morrison, A. Aertsen, and M. Diesmann, “Spike-timing-dependent plasticity in balanced random networks,” Neural computation, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1437–1467, 2007

2007
[212]

Learning real-world stimuli in a neural network with spike-driven synaptic dynamics,

J. M. Brader, W. Senn, and S. Fusi, “Learning real-world stimuli in a neural network with spike-driven synaptic dynamics,” Neural computation, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 2881–2912, 2007

2007
[213]

Towards biologically plausible deep learning,

Y . Bengio, D.-H. Lee, J. Bornschein, T. Mesnard, and Z. Lin, “Towards biologically plausible deep learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.04156, 2015

2015 arXiv
[214]

Simple and complex spiking neurons: Perspectives and analysis in a simple stdp scenario,

D. L. Manna, A. Vicente-Sola, P. Kirkland, T. J. Bihl, and G. Di Cate- rina, “Simple and complex spiking neurons: Perspectives and analysis in a simple stdp scenario,” Neuromorphic Computing and Engineering, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 044009, 2022

2022
[215]

Fspinn: An optimization framework for memory-efficient and energy-efficient spiking neural networks,

R. V . W. Putra and M. Shafique, “Fspinn: An optimization framework for memory-efficient and energy-efficient spiking neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 3601–3613, 2020

2020
[216]

Feedforward categorization on aer motion events using cortex-like features in a spiking neural network,

B. Zhao, R. Ding, S. Chen, B. Linares-Barranco, and H. Tang, “Feedforward categorization on aer motion events using cortex-like features in a spiking neural network,” IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems , vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1963–1978, 2014

1963
[217]

An event-based categorization model using spatio-temporal features in a spiking neural network,

J. Lu, J. Dong, R. Yan, and H. Tang, “An event-based categorization model using spatio-temporal features in a spiking neural network,” in 2020 12th International Conference on Advanced Computational Intelligence (ICACI). IEEE, 2020, pp. 385–390

2020
[218]

Robust object recognition with cortex-like mechanisms,

T. Serre, L. Wolf, S. Bileschi, M. Riesenhuber, and T. Poggio, “Robust object recognition with cortex-like mechanisms,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 411–426, 2007

2007
[219]

Unsupervised aer object recognition based on multiscale spatio-temporal features and spiking neurons,

Q. Liu, G. Pan, H. Ruan, D. Xing, Q. Xu, and H. Tang, “Unsupervised aer object recognition based on multiscale spatio-temporal features and spiking neurons,” IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 5300–5311, 2020

2020
[220]

A bio-inspired hierarchical spiking neural network with reward-modulated stdp learning rule for aer object recognition,

Q. Zhou and X. Li, “A bio-inspired hierarchical spiking neural network with reward-modulated stdp learning rule for aer object recognition,” IEEE Sensors Journal , 2022

2022
[221]

Bio-inspired unsupervised learning of visual features leads to robust invariant object recognition,

S. R. Kheradpisheh, M. Ganjtabesh, and T. Masquelier, “Bio-inspired unsupervised learning of visual features leads to robust invariant object recognition,” Neurocomputing, vol. 205, pp. 382–392, 2016

2016
[222]

Unsupervised regenerative learning of hierarchi- cal features in spiking deep networks for object recognition,

P. Panda and K. Roy, “Unsupervised regenerative learning of hierarchi- cal features in spiking deep networks for object recognition,” in 2016 international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN) . IEEE, 2016, pp. 299–306

2016
[223]

Training spiking convnets by stdp and gradient descent,

A. Tavanaei, Z. Kirby, and A. S. Maida, “Training spiking convnets by stdp and gradient descent,” in 2018 international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN) . IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–8

2018
[224]

Learning from event cameras with sparse spiking convolutional neural networks,

L. Cordone, B. Miramond, and S. Ferrante, “Learning from event cameras with sparse spiking convolutional neural networks,” in 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–8

2021
[225]

Hybrid macro/micro level backpropa- gation for training deep spiking neural networks,

Y . Jin, W. Zhang, and P. Li, “Hybrid macro/micro level backpropa- gation for training deep spiking neural networks,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 31, 2018

2018
[226]

Training high-performance low-latency spiking neural networks by differen- tiation on spike representation,

Q. Meng, M. Xiao, S. Yan, Y . Wang, Z. Lin, and Z.-Q. Luo, “Training high-performance low-latency spiking neural networks by differen- tiation on spike representation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2022, pp. 12 444–12 453

2022
[227]

Online training through time for spiking neural networks,

M. Xiao, Q. Meng, Z. Zhang, D. He, and Z. Lin, “Online training through time for spiking neural networks,” Advances in Neural Infor- mation Processing Systems , vol. 35, pp. 20 717–20 730, 2022

2022
[228]

Attention spiking neural networks,

M. Yao, G. Zhao, H. Zhang, Y . Hu, L. Deng, Y . Tian, B. Xu, and G. Li, “Attention spiking neural networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.13929, 2022

2022 arXiv
[229]

Real spike: Learning real-valued spikes for spiking neural networks,

Y . Guo, L. Zhang, Y . Chen, X. Tong, X. Liu, Y . Wang, X. Huang, and Z. Ma, “Real spike: Learning real-valued spikes for spiking neural networks,” in European Conference on Computer Vision . Springer, 2022, pp. 52–68

2022
[230]

Convolutional spiking neural networks for spatio- temporal feature extraction,

A. Samadzadeh, F. S. T. Far, A. Javadi, A. Nickabadi, and M. H. Chehreghani, “Convolutional spiking neural networks for spatio- temporal feature extraction,”Neural Processing Letters, pp. 1–17, 2023

2023
[231]

Mapping from frame- driven to frame-free event-driven vision systems by low-rate rate coding and coincidence processing–application to feedforward con- vnets,

J. A. P ´erez-Carrasco, B. Zhao, C. Serrano, B. Acha, T. Serrano- Gotarredona, S. Chen, and B. Linares-Barranco, “Mapping from frame- driven to frame-free event-driven vision systems by low-rate rate coding and coincidence processing–application to feedforward con- vnets,” IEE...

2013
[232]

Training spiking deep networks for neuromorphic hardware,

E. Hunsberger and C. Eliasmith, “Training spiking deep networks for neuromorphic hardware,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.05141 , 2016

2016 arXiv
[233]

Exploring the connection between binary and spiking neural networks,

S. Lu and A. Sengupta, “Exploring the connection between binary and spiking neural networks,” Frontiers in neuroscience , vol. 14, p. 535, 2020

2020
[234]

Gesture-snn: co-optimizing accuracy, latency and energy of snns for neuromorphic vision sensors,

S. Singh, A. Sarma, S. Lu, A. Sengupta, V . Narayanan, and C. R. Das, “Gesture-snn: co-optimizing accuracy, latency and energy of snns for neuromorphic vision sensors,” in 2021 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design (ISLPED) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–6

2021
[235]

Backpropagation for energy-efficient neuromorphic computing,

S. K. Esser, R. Appuswamy, P. Merolla, J. V . Arthur, and D. S. Modha, “Backpropagation for energy-efficient neuromorphic computing,” Ad- vances in neural information processing systems , vol. 28, 2015

2015
[236]

An efficient spiking neural network for recognizing gestures with a dvs camera on the loihi neuromorphic processor,

R. Massa, A. Marchisio, M. Martina, and M. Shafique, “An efficient spiking neural network for recognizing gestures with a dvs camera on the loihi neuromorphic processor,” in 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–9

2020
[237]

Event-driven contrastive divergence for spiking neuromorphic systems,

E. Neftci, S. Das, B. Pedroni, K. Kreutz-Delgado, and G. Cauwen- berghs, “Event-driven contrastive divergence for spiking neuromorphic systems,” Frontiers in neuroscience, vol. 7, p. 272, 2014

2014
[238]

Unsupervised learning of hierarchical representations with convolutional deep belief networks,

H. Lee, R. Grosse, R. Ranganath, and A. Y . Ng, “Unsupervised learning of hierarchical representations with convolutional deep belief networks,” Communications of the ACM , vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 95–103, 2011

2011
[239]

Real- time classification and sensor fusion with a spiking deep belief net- work,

P. O’Connor, D. Neil, S.-C. Liu, T. Delbruck, and M. Pfeiffer, “Real- time classification and sensor fusion with a spiking deep belief net- work,” Frontiers in neuroscience, vol. 7, p. 178, 2013

2013
[240]

Scalable energy-efficient, low-latency implementations of trained spiking deep belief networks on spinnaker,

E. Stromatias, D. Neil, F. Galluppi, M. Pfeiffer, S.-C. Liu, and S. Furber, “Scalable energy-efficient, low-latency implementations of trained spiking deep belief networks on spinnaker,” in 2015 Interna- tional Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) . IEEE, 2015, pp. 1–8

2015
[241]

A digital neurosynaptic core using embedded crossbar mem- ory with 45pj per spike in 45nm,

P. Merolla, J. Arthur, F. Akopyan, N. Imam, R. Manohar, and D. S. Modha, “A digital neurosynaptic core using embedded crossbar mem- ory with 45pj per spike in 45nm,” in 2011 IEEE custom integrated circuits conference (CICC) . IEEE, 2011, pp. 1–4

2011
[242]

Minitaur, an event-driven fpga-based spiking network accelerator,

D. Neil and S.-C. Liu, “Minitaur, an event-driven fpga-based spiking network accelerator,” IEEE transactions on very large scale integration (VLSI) systems, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2621–2628, 2014

2014
[243]

A spike-based long short-term memory on a neurosynaptic processor,

A. Shrestha, K. Ahmed, Y . Wang, D. P. Widemann, A. T. Moody, B. C. Van Essen, and Q. Qiu, “A spike-based long short-term memory on a neurosynaptic processor,” in 2017 IEEE/ACM international conference on computer-aided design (ICCAD) . IEEE, 2017, pp. 631–637

2017
[244]

Conversion of artificial recurrent neural networks to spiking neural networks for low-power neuromorphic hardware,

P. U. Diehl, G. Zarrella, A. Cassidy, B. U. Pedroni, and E. Neftci, “Conversion of artificial recurrent neural networks to spiking neural networks for low-power neuromorphic hardware,” in 2016 IEEE Inter- national Conference on Rebooting Computing (ICRC) . IEEE, 2016, pp. 1–8

2016
[245]

A new spiking convolutional recurrent neural network (scrnn) with applications to event-based hand gesture recognition,

Y . Xing, G. Di Caterina, and J. Soraghan, “A new spiking convolutional recurrent neural network (scrnn) with applications to event-based hand gesture recognition,” Frontiers in neuroscience , vol. 14, p. 590164, 2020

2020
[246]

Phased lstm: Accelerating recur- rent network training for long or event-based sequences,

D. Neil, M. Pfeiffer, and S.-C. Liu, “Phased lstm: Accelerating recur- rent network training for long or event-based sequences,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 29, 2016

2016
[247]

D-lsm: Deep liquid state machine with un- supervised recurrent reservoir tuning,

Q. Wang and P. Li, “D-lsm: Deep liquid state machine with un- supervised recurrent reservoir tuning,” in 2016 23rd International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) . IEEE, 2016, pp. 2652– 2657

2016
[248]

Liquid state machine on spinnaker for spatio- temporal classification tasks,

A. Pati ˜no-Saucedo, H. Rostro-Gonz ´alez, T. Serrano-Gotarredona, and B. Linares-Barranco, “Liquid state machine on spinnaker for spatio- temporal classification tasks,” Frontiers in Neuroscience , vol. 16, p. 819063, 2022

2022
[249]

Neucube: A spiking neural network architecture for mapping, learning and understanding of spatio-temporal brain data,

N. K. Kasabov, “Neucube: A spiking neural network architecture for mapping, learning and understanding of spatio-temporal brain data,” Neural Networks, vol. 52, pp. 62–76, 2014

2014
[250]

A retinotopic spiking neural network system for accurate recognition of moving objects using neucube and dynamic vision sensors,

L. Paulun, A. Wendt, and N. Kasabov, “A retinotopic spiking neural network system for accurate recognition of moving objects using neucube and dynamic vision sensors,” Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, vol. 12, p. 42, 2018

2018
[251]

Comparison of artificial and spik- ing neural networks on digital hardware,

S. Davidson and S. B. Furber, “Comparison of artificial and spik- ing neural networks on digital hardware,” Frontiers in Neuroscience , vol. 15, p. 651141, 2021

2021
[252]

Spiking neural network regularization with fixed and adaptive drop-keep probabilities,

J. Zhao, J. Yang, J. Wang, and W. Wu, “Spiking neural network regularization with fixed and adaptive drop-keep probabilities,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 4096–4109, 2021

2021
[253]

Neocognitron: A hierarchical neural network capable of visual pattern recognition,

K. Fukushima, “Neocognitron: A hierarchical neural network capable of visual pattern recognition,” Neural networks, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 119– 130, 1988

1988
[254]

Hierarchical models of object recog- nition in cortex,

M. Riesenhuber and T. Poggio, “Hierarchical models of object recog- nition in cortex,” Nature neuroscience, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 1019–1025, 1999

1999
[255]

Theory of communication. part 1: The analysis of informa- tion,

D. Gabor, “Theory of communication. part 1: The analysis of informa- tion,” Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers-part III: radio and communication engineering , vol. 93, no. 26, pp. 429–441, 1946

1946
[256]

Neuromodulated spike-timing- dependent plasticity, and theory of three-factor learning rules,

N. Fr ´emaux and W. Gerstner, “Neuromodulated spike-timing- dependent plasticity, and theory of three-factor learning rules,” Fron- tiers in neural circuits , vol. 9, p. 85, 2016

2016
[257]

Deep convolutional models improve predictions of macaque v1 responses to natural images,

S. A. Cadena, G. H. Denfield, E. Y . Walker, L. A. Gatys, A. S. Tolias, M. Bethge, and A. S. Ecker, “Deep convolutional models improve predictions of macaque v1 responses to natural images,” PLoS computational biology, vol. 15, no. 4, p. e1006897, 2019

2019
[258]

Condition-cnn: A hierar- chical multi-label fashion image classification model,

B. Kolisnik, I. Hogan, and F. Zulkernine, “Condition-cnn: A hierar- chical multi-label fashion image classification model,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 182, p. 115195, 2021

2021
[259]

Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition,

Y . LeCun, L. Bottou, Y . Bengio, and P. Haffner, “Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 2278–2324, 1998

1998
[260]

Attention mechanisms in computer vision: A survey,

M.-H. Guo, T.-X. Xu, J.-J. Liu, Z.-N. Liu, P.-T. Jiang, T.-J. Mu, S.- H. Zhang, R. R. Martin, M.-M. Cheng, and S.-M. Hu, “Attention mechanisms in computer vision: A survey,” Computational visual media, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 331–368, 2022

2022
[261]

Temporal-wise attention spiking neural networks for event streams classification,

M. Yao, H. Gao, G. Zhao, D. Wang, Y . Lin, Z. Yang, and G. Li, “Temporal-wise attention spiking neural networks for event streams classification,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Confer- ence on Computer Vision , 2021, pp. 10 221–10 230

2021
[262]

Deep residual learning for image recognition,

K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2016, pp. 770–778

2016
[263]

Identity mappings in deep residual networks,

——, “Identity mappings in deep residual networks,” in Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11–14, 2016, Proceedings, Part IV 14. Springer, 2016, pp. 630–645

2016
[264]

A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets,

G. E. Hinton, S. Osindero, and Y .-W. Teh, “A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets,” Neural computation , vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1527– 1554, 2006

2006
[265]

Generating facial expressions with deep belief nets,

J. M. Susskind, G. E. Hinton, J. R. Movellan, and A. K. Anderson, “Generating facial expressions with deep belief nets,” Affective com- puting, emotion modelling, synthesis and recognition , vol. 2008, no. 5, pp. 421–440, 2008

2008
[266]

Facial expression recognition via a boosted deep belief network,

P. Liu, S. Han, Z. Meng, and Y . Tong, “Facial expression recognition via a boosted deep belief network,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2014, pp. 1805–1812

2014
[267]

Rough deep belief network-application to incomplete handwritten digits pattern classification,

W. K. Mleczko, T. Kapu ´sci´nski, and R. K. Nowicki, “Rough deep belief network-application to incomplete handwritten digits pattern classification,” in Information and Software Technologies: 21st Interna- tional Conference, ICIST 2015, Druskininkai, Lithuania, October 15- 16,...

2015
[268]

Convolutional deep belief networks on cifar-10,

A. Krizhevsky and G. Hinton, “Convolutional deep belief networks on cifar-10,” Unpublished manuscript, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 1–9, 2010

2010
[269]

On the first passage time probability problem,

A. J. Siegert, “On the first passage time probability problem,” Physical Review, vol. 81, no. 4, p. 617, 1951

1951
[270]

Gradient flow in recurrent nets: the difficulty of learning long-term dependen- cies,

S. Hochreiter, Y . Bengio, P. Frasconi, J. Schmidhuber et al., “Gradient flow in recurrent nets: the difficulty of learning long-term dependen- cies,” 2001

2001
[271]

An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms,

S. Ruder, “An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.04747 , 2016

2016 arXiv
[272]

Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,

D. P. Kingma, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014

2014 arXiv
[273]

Reservoir computing approaches to recurrent neural network training,

M. Luko ˇseviˇcius and H. Jaeger, “Reservoir computing approaches to recurrent neural network training,” Computer science review , vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 127–149, 2009

2009
[274]

An overview of reservoir computing: theory, applications and implementations,

B. Schrauwen, D. Verstraeten, and J. Van Campenhout, “An overview of reservoir computing: theory, applications and implementations,” in Proceedings of the 15th european symposium on artificial neural networks. p. 471-482 2007 , 2007, pp. 471–482

2007
[275]

Liquid state machines: motivation, theory, and applica- tions,

W. Maass, “Liquid state machines: motivation, theory, and applica- tions,” Computability in context: computation and logic in the real world, pp. 275–296, 2011

2011
[276]

Spiking neural networks and their applications: A review,

K. Yamazaki, V .-K. V o-Ho, D. Bulsara, and N. Le, “Spiking neural networks and their applications: A review,” Brain Sciences , vol. 12, no. 7, p. 863, 2022

2022
[277]

Overview of spiking neural network learning approaches and their computational complexities,

P. Pietrzak, S. Szczesny, D. Huderek, and Ł. Przyborowski, “Overview of spiking neural network learning approaches and their computational complexities,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 6, p. 3037, 2023

2023
[278]

Analyzing time- to-first-spike coding schemes: A theoretical approach,

L. Bonilla, J. Gautrais, S. Thorpe, and T. Masquelier, “Analyzing time- to-first-spike coding schemes: A theoretical approach,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 16, p. 971937, 2022

2022
[279]

An introduction to roc analysis,

T. Fawcett, “An introduction to roc analysis,” Pattern recognition letters, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 861–874, 2006

2006
[280]

The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (roc) curve

J. A. Hanley and B. J. McNeil, “The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (roc) curve.” Radiology, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 29–36, 1982

1982
[281]

A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis,

G. Litjens, T. Kooi, B. E. Bejnordi, A. A. A. Setio, F. Ciompi, M. Ghafoorian, J. A. Van Der Laak, B. Van Ginneken, and C. I. S´anchez, “A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis,” Medical image analysis , vol. 42, pp. 60–88, 2017

2017
[282]

D. M. Green, J. A. Swets et al. , Signal detection theory and psy- chophysics. Wiley New York, 1966, vol. 1

1966
[283]

Basic principles of roc analysis,

C. E. Metz, “Basic principles of roc analysis,” in Seminars in nuclear medicine, vol. 8, no. 4. Elsevier, 1978, pp. 283–298

1978
[284]

An analytical estimation of spiking neural networks energy efficiency,

E. Lemaire, L. Cordone, A. Castagnetti, P.-E. Novac, J. Courtois, and B. Miramond, “An analytical estimation of spiking neural networks energy efficiency,” in International Conference on Neural Information Processing. Springer, 2022, pp. 574–587

2022
[285]

Conversion of analog to spiking neural networks using sparse temporal coding,

B. Rueckauer and S.-C. Liu, “Conversion of analog to spiking neural networks using sparse temporal coding,” in 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) . IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–5

2018
[286]

Spiking deep residual networks,

Y . Hu, H. Tang, and G. Pan, “Spiking deep residual networks,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 5200–5205, 2021

2021
[287]

Towards low- latency energy-efficient deep snns via attention-guided compression,

S. Kundu, G. Datta, M. Pedram, and P. A. Beerel, “Towards low- latency energy-efficient deep snns via attention-guided compression,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.12445 , 2021

2021 arXiv
[288]

Diet-snn: A low-latency spiking neural network with direct input encoding and leakage and threshold optimization,

N. Rathi and K. Roy, “Diet-snn: A low-latency spiking neural network with direct input encoding and leakage and threshold optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 3174–3182, 2021

2021
[289]

Efficient simulation of large-scale spiking neural networks using cuda graphics processors,

J. M. Nageswaran, N. Dutt, J. L. Krichmar, A. Nicolau, and A. Vei- denbaum, “Efficient simulation of large-scale spiking neural networks using cuda graphics processors,” in 2009 International Joint Confer- ence on Neural Networks . IEEE, 2009, pp. 2145–2152

2009
[290]

Spiking neural network with weight- sharing synaptic array for multi-input processing,

S. Song, M. Kim, B. Jeon, D. Ryu, S. Kim, K. Lee, J.-H. Lee, J.-J. Kim, W. Shim, D. Kwon et al., “Spiking neural network with weight- sharing synaptic array for multi-input processing,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 1657–1660, 2022

2022
[291]

A synaptic pruning- based spiking neural network for hand-written digits classification,

F. Faghihi, H. Alashwal, and A. A. Moustafa, “A synaptic pruning- based spiking neural network for hand-written digits classification,” Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence , vol. 5, p. 680165, 2022

2022
[292]

Efficient spiking neural networks with radix encoding,

Z. Wang, X. Gu, R. S. M. Goh, J. T. Zhou, and T. Luo, “Efficient spiking neural networks with radix encoding,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 3689–3701, 2022

2022
[293]

C. M. Bishop, Neural networks for pattern recognition . Oxford university press, 1995

1995
[294]

On information and sufficiency,

S. Kullback and R. A. Leibler, “On information and sufficiency,” The annals of mathematical statistics , vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 79–86, 1951

1951
[295]

Advancements in algorithms and neuromorphic hardware for spiking neural networks,

A. Javanshir, T. T. Nguyen, M. P. Mahmud, and A. Z. Kouzani, “Advancements in algorithms and neuromorphic hardware for spiking neural networks,” Neural Computation, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1289–1328, 2022

2022
[296]

Enabling deep spiking neural networks with hybrid conversion and spike timing dependent backpropagation,

N. Rathi, G. Srinivasan, P. Panda, and K. Roy, “Enabling deep spiking neural networks with hybrid conversion and spike timing dependent backpropagation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01807 , 2020

2005 arXiv
[297]

Continual learning through synaptic intelligence,

F. Zenke, B. Poole, and S. Ganguli, “Continual learning through synaptic intelligence,” in International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2017, pp. 3987–3995

2017
[298]

Opportunities for neuromorphic computing algorithms and applications,

C. D. Schuman, S. R. Kulkarni, M. Parsa, J. P. Mitchell, B. Kay et al. , “Opportunities for neuromorphic computing algorithms and applications,” Nature Computational Science, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 10–19, 2022

2022
[2017]

Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/ fnins.2017.00309

[Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/ fnins.2017.00309

2017
[2020]

Available: https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-toolkit

[Online]. Available: https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-toolkit

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [71]

Event-snn-resources,

C. Iaboni and P. Abichandani, “Event-snn-resources,” https://github. com/radlab-sketch/Event-SNN-Resources/, 2024, gitHub repository

2024

[2] [1]

On the computational power of winner-take-all,

W. Maass, “On the computational power of winner-take-all,” Neural computation, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 2519–2535, 2000

2000

[3] [2]

Triplets of spikes in a model of spike timing-dependent plasticity,

J.-P. Pfister and W. Gerstner, “Triplets of spikes in a model of spike timing-dependent plasticity,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 38, pp. 9673–9682, 2006

2006

[4] [3]

The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain

F. Rosenblatt, “The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain.” Psychological review, vol. 65, no. 6, p. 386, 1958

1958

[5] [4]

Minsky and S

M. Minsky and S. A. Papert, Perceptrons, reissue of the 1988 expanded edition with a new foreword by L ´eon Bottou: an introduction to computational geometry. MIT press, 2017

1988

[6] [5]

Notice on the law that the population follows in its growth,

P. Verhulst, “Notice on the law that the population follows in its growth,” Corresp Math Phys , vol. 10, pp. 113–26, 1838

[7] [6]

Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines,

V . Nair and G. E. Hinton, “Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines,” in Proceedings of the 27th international confer- ence on machine learning (ICML-10) , 2010, pp. 807–814

2010

[8] [7]

Learning repre- sentations by back-propagating errors,

D. E. Rumelhart, G. E. Hinton, and R. J. Williams, “Learning repre- sentations by back-propagating errors,” nature, vol. 323, no. 6088, pp. 533–536, 1986

1986