$\beta$ orientation reconstruction and shear deformation calculation in hcp-bcc-hcp phase transformation

Philip Eisenlohr; Thomas R. Bieler; Zhuowen Zhao

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 12 references

$\beta$ orientation reconstruction and shear deformation calculation in hcp-bcc-hcp phase transformation

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Four or more α child grains uniquely determine the correct parent β orientation, the paper claims, and a windowed cluster-averaging algorithm reconstructs it from EBSD maps while a frame-rotation method computes the transformation…

desk verdict A practical beta-reconstruction tool with a clear algorithm, but the 'always correct' uniqueness claim is only tested against its own forward model. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17029 v1 pith:UXNVLUVA submitted 2024-11-26 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Zhuowen Zhao , Thomas R. Bieler , Philip Eisenlohr This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords βreconstructionBurgersorientationrelationshiphcp-bccphasetransformationvariantselectionelectronbackscatterdiffractiondeformationgradientclusteranalysistitaniumalloys

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the parent β (bcc) orientation can be recovered uniquely and correctly from as few as four child α (hcp) grains that obey the Burgers orientation relationship, and that a practical, parallel-friendly algorithm can do this pixel by pixel over large electron backscatter diffraction maps. It also derives deformation-gradient variants for the hcp→bcc→hcp transformation by chaining two frame-rotation and shape-change steps, giving a direct way to feed transformation kinematics into continuum models. If the claims hold, researchers studying variant selection during α→β→α transformations in titanium and zirconium alloys can reconstruct the hidden β microstructure from the room-temperature α map, and can compute the accompanying shape changes without ad-hoc fitting.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the Burgers orientation relationship expressed as an explicit rotation–stretch chain: a ±5.26° rotation $R_a$ (or $R_b$) around the hexagonal $\langle c\rangle$ axis aligns the hcp $\langle 2\,1\,1\,0\rangle$ direction with the bcc $\langle 1\,1\,1\rangle$ direction, and a plane strain $U$ stretches along hcp $\langle 1\,2\,1\,0\rangle$ and contracts along $\langle 1\,0\,\bar{1}\,0\rangle$. Reversing the chain with hexagonal and cubic symmetry operators (12 and 24, respectively) yields the six possible parent orientations per α grain and the 57 distinct hcp→bcc→hcp variants. The reconstruction method's core is the uniqueness rule (a group of $N_{\text{combo}} \ge 4$ α orientations shares exactly one β parent within tolerance), implemented through a window-searching cluster-averaging scheme; the deformation-gradient method's core is the composition $\mathbf{F} = \mathbf{F}_2 \mathbf{F}_1$, where $\mathbf{F}_1$ carries the hcp→bcc shape change in the hexagonal frame and $\mathbf{F}_2$ carries the bcc→hcp shape change in the transformed bcc frame.

What would settle it

Take an EBSD map of a sample whose parent β orientations are known independently (e.g., from in-situ high-temperature measurements during β→α transformation), reconstruct β with this algorithm, and count how many pixels assigned a β orientation from a group of at least four α partners deviate from the known parent by more than the 5° tolerance; any such deviation would violate the claim that a uniquely determined β is always correct.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's synthetic study yields a 'unique determination rule': when at least four α child orientations from the same parent β grain are considered together, the back-calculated parent β orientation is unique, and that unique candidate always coincides with the true parent (in the synthetic tests). The reconstruction algorithm implements this rule by clustering α grains by orientation, back-calculating the six possible β parents per α orientation using the Burgers-related rotation–stretch chain, and then using a spatial window search to find the largest group of grains sharing one parent orientation, which is assigned to every grain in the cluster. On measured EBSD of Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo, interwoven α plates from the same parent take on a single color in the reconstructed map. A companion deformation-gradient method composes the same rotation–stretch steps into $\mathbf{F} = \mathbf{F}_2\mathbf{F}_1$ to deliver the shape-change variants for all 57 transformation paths.

Load-bearing premise

The reconstruction assumes every α grain obeys the Burgers orientation relationship exactly, with the same 5.26° rotation and same stretch U, and that a uniform 5° tolerance cleanly separates true parent–child pairs; if real grains deviate (non-ideal c/a, orientation gradients, or near-threshold misorientations), the uniqueness rule can return a unique but wrong parent β.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Whenever at least four α grains from the same parent β grain appear in a map, their unique common β orientation can be assigned without exhaustive pairwise searches, making the method fast enough for large maps and parallel execution.
The same rotation–stretch operators, composed as $\mathbf{F} = \mathbf{F}_2 \mathbf{F}_1$, give a deformation gradient for each of the 57 hcp→bcc→hcp variants, so crystal-plasticity and phase-field models can compute transformation strain directly from orientation data.
The reconstruction should be reliable for lamellar (basket-weave) α microstructures typical of near-α and α+β titanium alloys, where multiple α plates per parent are common.
Because the method groups reconstructed β orientations rather than α grains, it should retain the accuracy of the Monte Carlo and SMMA class of methods while gaining the speed of grain-grouping approaches.
The unique determination rule also serves as a built-in reliability check: a β orientation reconstructed from fewer than four α partners is inherently ambiguous.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The minimal-variant count of four may be a general feature of reconstructions from orientation relationships with six variants per parent; the same windowed strategy could be tested on fcc→bcc transformations following the Kurdjumov–Sachs relationship.
The deformation-gradient formula assumes an ideal c/a ratio; for real alloys, the 5.26° twist and stretch U would need to be re-fit from the actual c/a, and the 57-variant list would shift accordingly—an implicit sensitivity the paper notes but does not quantify.
The uniform 5° tolerance is likely the main source of misassignments in real microstructures; an adaptive tolerance derived from intragrain orientation spread could reduce errors at grain boundaries, though this is not tested here.
The reconstruction's window size is a free parameter; choosing it from the local α plate width could improve performance in microstructures with strongly varying grain sizes.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this is a practical beta-reconstruction method that deserves referee time, but the headline accuracy claim is only proven against the authors' own forward model.

The genuinely new piece is the combination of a window search to limit candidate alpha grains plus cluster-averaged parent beta determination, and the empirical rule that four or more alpha variants uniquely fix the parent. That is a useful idea for the Ti/Zr EBSD community, where current methods trade speed against accuracy. The deformation gradient framework in Section 2.1 is also a clear, systematic derivation; the 57-variant table in the appendix is a handy reference.

The algorithm is described in enough detail that a competent group could reimplement it, and the code is on GitHub. The synthetic test is a sensible closed-loop check of the grouping logic, and the measured-data demo on Ti-6246 shows visually sensible reconstruction of the lamellar alpha.

The soft spots are all about validation. The synthetic data is generated from the same Burgers model with a fixed 5.26-degree rotation and ideal c/a; the reconstruction inverts that same model. So the 'always correct' uniqueness rule is only established for perfect BOR, not for real microstructures with non-ideal c/a, orientation gradients, or EBSD noise. The measured-data reconstruction has no ground truth; it only shows that interwoven lamellae get similar colors. There are no quantitative error numbers, no sensitivity analysis for the 5-degree tolerance or window size, and the paper does not state which version of the code was used. The deformation gradient part notes that alloy-specific c/a should be used but does not provide the modified stretch tensor or an error estimate for ignoring it. These are fixable, but they matter because the method's practical value depends on robustness to exactly the deviations the synthetic test excludes.

Who will get value: experimentalists working on alpha/beta titanium and zirconium who want an automated reconstruction tool and don't need formal guarantees. It is a methods paper, not a breakthrough, but it is a useful addition. I would send it to peer review, with the expectation that the authors add a noised synthetic test, a ground-truth comparison (e.g., high-temperature EBSD or simulated parent), and a sensitivity study. Those additions would make the accuracy claims credible.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript proposes a two-part computational method for the hcp→bcc→hcp phase transformation in titanium and zirconium alloys. The first part is a window-based, cluster-averaging algorithm that reconstructs parent bcc β orientations pixel-wise from EBSD-indexed hcp α orientations; the authors claim that a unique β parent orientation is determined when at least four α orientations share it, and demonstrate the approach on synthetic stripe microstructures and a measured Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo map. The second part derives deformation-gradient variants from the same orientation relationship using successive frame rotations and a plane stretch U, with results summarized for 57 variants. Public Python code is provided.

Significance. If the reconstruction method is validated, it offers a useful alternative in a space where existing β-reconstruction methods trade accuracy against efficiency, and the deformation-gradient formulation could facilitate integration of transformation kinematics into continuum models. The manuscript's strengths include a clearly enumerated algorithm, a reproducible synthetic demonstration of the Burgers-relation bookkeeping, and public code. However, the validation is not independent: the synthetic test is generated from the same forward model that the inverse reconstruction assumes, no quantitative misorientation error is reported between reconstructed and true β orientations, and the measured-data check lacks ground truth. The deformation-gradient part is internally consistent but explicitly uses an ideal-c/a stretch; the paper acknowledges but does not implement composition-dependent corrections. These gaps are load-bearing for the central claims.

major comments (4)

[Section 3.2, Fig. 6 and Footnote 4] The unique determination rule is established only by a closed-loop synthetic test: the α orientations are produced by applying the same Ra/Rb/U Burgers transformation and symmetry operations that the reconstruction inverts. This verifies consistency of the grouping and bookkeeping logic, but it does not test the reconstruction under model violations such as non-ideal c/a, orientation spread within grains, EBSD noise, or tolerance-boundary misassignment. The statement that the uniquely determined β orientation is 'always correct' therefore overreaches. Please report a quantitative error metric (for example, the distribution of misorientation angles between reconstructed and true β) and a sensitivity analysis with respect to orientation noise, c/a ratio, and the 5.00° tolerance.
[Section 3.3, Fig. 5] The measured-data demonstration has no ground-truth β orientations; the observation that neighboring lamellae receive similar colors demonstrates internal consistency but not correctness. To support the 'successfully applied' claim, the authors should either compare reconstructed β orientations against an independent reconstruction method on the same map, validate against a known prior-β structure, or clearly state that the result is only a plausibility check. Without such evidence, the conclusion in Section 4 that the approach was 'successfully applied' is not supported.
[Section 2.1, Eqs. (1)-(3)] The deformation-gradient calculation is central to the manuscript's second claimed contribution, but Eqs. (1)-(3) use a fixed 5.26° rotation and a stretch U determined for the ideal c/a ratio. Section 2.1 acknowledges that 'a specific c/a ratio should be applied' for varying alloy compositions, yet no modified U or Ra/Rb is supplied and no error estimate is given for the ideal-c/a approximation. Please provide the explicit composition-dependent parameters or restrict the claim to ideal-c/a materials, and quantify the resulting error for real alloys such as Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo.
[Sections 3.1-3.3] The algorithm depends on two free parameters that are not systematically examined: the 5.00° misorientation threshold used in Floodfill grain identification and in orientationID clustering, and the window size m (m = 71 in the measured demonstration). Reconstruction accuracy, completeness, and runtime all plausibly depend on these choices. The paper should include a sensitivity study for both parameters and provide guidance on how to select them for new datasets.

minor comments (5)

[Table 1] The list of 12 hexagonal symmetry operators contains duplicate entries (h5 = h8 and h6 = h9), which is inconsistent with the text stating that there are 12 operators. Please correct the table and verify that the code uses 12 distinct operators.
[Fig. 6] The axis label 'ambiguity cumulative probability' is not defined in the text. Please define how uniqueness is measured, report the number of random trials underlying the figure, and state how the cumulative probability is computed.
[Eqs. (1)-(2)] The underbrace notation in Eqs. (1) and (2) is difficult to parse; the individual factors such as Rfr1, Rfr2, and the bracketed groups should be defined explicitly or the equations should be re-typeset as clear matrix products.
[Section 5, Code Availability] The code availability statement gives only a GitHub URL; please provide a versioned release or DOI, list dependencies, and include a short test script so that the synthetic validation is reproducible.
[Footnote 4] The notation Ncombo is introduced only in a footnote; define it in the main text and explain the relationship between Ncombo and the algorithm's group-size criterion.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Partial circularity: the unique-determination rule is validated only against synthetic alpha orientations generated by the same Burgers transformation model the reconstruction inverts; real-data demo has no ground truth.

other [Section 3.2, footnote 4 (and Figure 6)]
"To understand how many α variants are needed to determine a unique β orientation and whether the determined β orientation is correct: a syntheticβ is used to produce 12 α orientations; then the possible parent β orientations shared by a group (Ncombo = 2, 3, 4,.., 12) of these 12 α orientations are calculated and compared to the original β orientation. Figure 6 shows the number of possible parent β orientations determined from varying α group sizes, and it is found that the parentβ orientation is uniquely determined when Ncombo≥ 4."

The synthetic α orientations are generated from a random β by the same orientation-calculation chain (Section 2.2: Ra/Rb, Shex, Sbcc, 5.26° rotation, U) that the reconstruction inverts. The 'always correct' verdict therefore only confirms that the inverse of the assumed forward model recovers the assumed input; any error in the model itself (non-ideal c/a ratio, deviation from 5.26°, orientation spread, the fixed 5.00° tolerance) is invisible. The unique-determination rule is thus a property of the assumed transformation, not an independently validated prediction. The measured-data check (Fig. 5) has no ground-truth β orientations, so it does not break the closed loop; it only shows visually consistent colors for neighboring lamellae.

full rationale

The reconstruction algorithm itself has real, independent content: it formulates a cluster-averaging, window-searching grouping scheme and applies it to actual EBSD data, and the deformation-gradient derivation is an algebraic construction from the stated frame rotations and stretch. No load-bearing self-citation chain is present: the orientation-calculation framework is attributed to Humbert et al. (external), and the co-authored prior methods are not used to justify the central uniqueness claim. The circularity is confined to the validation of the unique-determination rule: the synthetic test (Section 3.2/footnote 4) generates α orientations by applying the exact forward model that the inverse reconstruction assumes, so the 'always correct' conclusion is guaranteed up to implementation and grouping logic. This tests internal consistency and bookkeeping, but it cannot detect violations of the assumed Burgers model, such as non-ideal c/a ratios or tolerance-boundary misassignments. The paper itself acknowledges in Section 2.1 that a specific c/a ratio should be used for varying alloy compositions, which is a correctness caveat rather than a circular step. Because the central algorithmic contribution retains independent content and the closed-loop test is only one part of the validation, the circularity is partial rather than total; score 4.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Burgers orientation relationship and the specific rotation-stretch decomposition for the hcp-bcc transformation. The two free parameters (5 degree tolerance and window size) are hand-chosen. No new physical entities are introduced. The main weakness is that the only quantitative validation uses synthetic data generated from the same forward model, so the uniqueness rule is not tested independently.

free parameters (2)

misorientation_threshold = 5.00 degrees
Used in three places: Floodfill grain identification, orientationID clustering, and window partner matching (Section 3.1). It is set to 5.00 degrees without a sensitivity analysis or physical justification for this specific value.
window_size = 71 pixels for the measured data example
The window side length m = 71 is chosen for the Ti-6246 sample demonstration. No analysis of how the reconstructed map changes with window size is provided, and this is effectively a free parameter of the algorithm.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The hcp-bcc transformation follows the Burgers orientation relationship with the specific rotation and stretch described in Section 2.
The entire back-calculation and deformation gradient derivation rests on this crystallographic model (Section 2, based on Burgers 1934). The paper notes that non-ideal c/a ratios would change the rotation, but it does not test this.
domain assumption The transformation kinematics can be decomposed into a rotation Ra/Rb about the basal normal and a stretch U, applied in the frames defined in the paper.
Equations (1) and (2) presuppose that two shape changes, a plane rotation plus a stretch, fully describe the lattice transformation. This is a standard but non-trivial modeling assumption for martensitic transformations.
domain assumption The measured EBSD alpha orientations are accurate and the sample is fully alpha phase at measurement temperature.
The validation in Section 3.3 assumes the EBSD map is a faithful representation of the alpha phase, which then serves as input to the reconstruction.
ad hoc to paper Synthetic data generated by the forward Burgers model is representative of real microstructures for testing the reconstruction.
The synthetic validation in Section 3.2 uses four blocks of random parent beta orientations and striped child alpha grains designed by the authors. This does not capture grain geometry effects, orientation gradients, or non-ideal transformations, yet it is the only quantitative basis for the uniqueness rule.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of $\beta$ orientation reconstruction and shear deformation calculation in hcp-bcc-hcp phase transformation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UXNVLUVA

@misc{pith2026241117029,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: $\beta$ orientation reconstruction and shear deformation calculation in hcp-bcc-hcp phase transformation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UXNVLUVA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17029}
}

abstract

We introduce a cluster-based technique to automate pixel-wise reconstruction of $\beta$ orientations from parent $\alpha$ orientations over large, indexed regions. This approach provides a valuable tool for analyzing problems that require historical information about current $\alpha$ microstructures, such as investigating variant selection mechanisms during the $\alpha \to \beta \to \alpha$ transformation. Additionally, we present a method for calculating deformation gradient variants associated with phase transformations between hcp ($\alpha$) and bcc ($\beta$) phases based upon a series of frame rotations and shape transformations. This method streamlines the integration of transformation kinematics into continuum-based models by enabling convenient computation of the deformation gradient governing the transformation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17029 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Schematics of hcp lattice (Euler angles ϕ1 = 0.00◦ , Φ = 0.00◦ , ϕ2 = 0.00◦ ) transforming to bcc lattice (one scenario, θ = ±5.26◦ ) β and its transformed α variants (vice versa) preserve specific orientation relationships called Burgers Orientation Relationship (BOR) [3]. The method to calculate lattice orientation in hcp-bcc-hcp phase transformation process is summarized as below.1 In addition, a statistical anal… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Schematic of reconstructing “parent” beta grains by a window searching algorithm. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** The first step: dynamically adding β orientations to the cluster by checking each β orientation of the “seed” against the β orientation of the other α orientations (columns). The second step excludes the members violating the unique determination rule. The third step finds the longest shared β cluster (magenta). identified β orientations (magenta and green β orientation), which is not a uniquely determined situation… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Correct β reconstruction results based upon synthetic data. The above implementation was first tested with synthetic data made with four blocks of random parent β orientations for each, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: β reconstruction (200 x 200) of lamella α phase in Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo using window size of 71 (original data provided by [1]). 3.3. Validation of bcc reconstruction based on measured data A measured orientation map of the α phase in a Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo (w.t.%) sample …

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: The “parent” beta orientation is uniquely determined when [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

12 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

[1]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...
[2]

, year 2015

author Banerjee, A. , year 2015 . title Deformation and Analysis of Slip in Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-0.1Si and Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo . Master's thesis. Indian Institute of Science. address Bangalore, India

work page 2015
[3]

, author Britton, T.B

author Birch, R. , author Britton, T.B. , year 2022 . title Effective structural unit analysis in hexagonal close-packed alloys -- reconstruction of parent microstructures and crystal orientation post-processing analysis . journal Journal of Applied Crystallography volume 55 , pages 33--45 . https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576721011584, :10.1107/S1600576721011584

work page doi:10.1107/s1600576721011584 2022
[4]

, year 1934

author Burgers, W. , year 1934 . title On the process of transition of the cubic-body-centered modification into the hexagonal-close-packed modification of zirconium . journal Physica volume 1 , pages 561--586

work page 1934
[5]

, author Artaud, B

author Cayron, C. , author Artaud, B. , author Briottet, L. , year 2006 . title Reconstruction of parent grains from EBSD data . journal Materials Characterization volume 57 , pages 386--401 . :10.1016/j.matchar.2006.03.008

work page doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2006.03.008 2006
[6]

, author Kobryn, P

author Glavicic, M. , author Kobryn, P. , author Bieler, T. , author Semiatin, S. , year 2003 . title A method to determine the orientation of the high-temperature beta phase from measured EBSD data for the low-temperature alpha phase in Ti-6Al-4V . journal Materials Science and Engineering: A volume 346 , pages 50--59 . :10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00535-X

work page doi:10.1016/s0921-5093(02)00535-x 2003
[7]

, author Parihar, M.S

author Hadke, S. , author Parihar, M.S. , author Shekhawat, S. , author Khatirkar, R.K. , year 2016 . title A new method for automated reconstruction of pre-transformation microstructures . journal Philosophical Magazine Letters volume 96 , pages 175--182 . :10.1080/09500839.2016.1180436

arXiv 2016
[8]

, author Wagner, F

author Humbert, M. , author Wagner, F. , author Moustahfid, H. , author Esling, C. , year 1995 . title Determination of the orientation of a parent grain from the orientations of the inherited plates in the phase transformation from body-centred cubic to hexagonal close packed . journal Journal of Applied Crystallography volume 28 , pages 571--576 . :10.1...

work page doi:10.1107/s0021889895004067 1995

Show all 12 references

[9]

, author Tripathi, P

author Krishna, K.M. , author Tripathi, P. , author Hiwarkar, V. , author Pant, P. , author Samajdar, I. , author Srivastava, D. , author Dey, G. , year 2010 . title Automated reconstruction of pre-transformation microstructures in zirconium . journal Scripta Materialia volume...

2010 doi
[10]

, author Peura, P

author Nyyss\"onen, T. , author Peura, P. , author Kuokkala, V. , year 2018 . title Crystallography, morphology, and martensite transformation of prior austenite in intercritically annealed high-aluminum steel. journal Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A volume 49 , pag...

2018 doi
[11]

, author Rollett, A.D

author Tari, V. , author Rollett, A.D. , author Beladi, H. , year 2013 . title Back calculation of parent austenite orientation using a clustering approach . journal Journal of Applied Crystallography volume 46 , pages 210--215 . :10.1107/S002188981204914X

2013 doi
[12]

, author Pilchak, A

author Zaitzeff, A. , author Pilchak, A. , author Berman, T. , author Allison, J. , author Esedoglu, S. , year 2021 . title A robust algorithm to calculate parent grain shapes and orientations from phase electron backscatter diffraction data in / -titanium alloys . journal Scr...

2021 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...

[2] [2]

, year 2015

author Banerjee, A. , year 2015 . title Deformation and Analysis of Slip in Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-0.1Si and Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo . Master's thesis. Indian Institute of Science. address Bangalore, India

work page 2015

[3] [3]

, author Britton, T.B

author Birch, R. , author Britton, T.B. , year 2022 . title Effective structural unit analysis in hexagonal close-packed alloys -- reconstruction of parent microstructures and crystal orientation post-processing analysis . journal Journal of Applied Crystallography volume 55 , pages 33--45 . https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576721011584, :10.1107/S1600576721011584

work page doi:10.1107/s1600576721011584 2022

[4] [4]

, year 1934

author Burgers, W. , year 1934 . title On the process of transition of the cubic-body-centered modification into the hexagonal-close-packed modification of zirconium . journal Physica volume 1 , pages 561--586

work page 1934

[5] [5]

, author Artaud, B

author Cayron, C. , author Artaud, B. , author Briottet, L. , year 2006 . title Reconstruction of parent grains from EBSD data . journal Materials Characterization volume 57 , pages 386--401 . :10.1016/j.matchar.2006.03.008

work page doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2006.03.008 2006

[6] [6]

, author Kobryn, P

author Glavicic, M. , author Kobryn, P. , author Bieler, T. , author Semiatin, S. , year 2003 . title A method to determine the orientation of the high-temperature beta phase from measured EBSD data for the low-temperature alpha phase in Ti-6Al-4V . journal Materials Science and Engineering: A volume 346 , pages 50--59 . :10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00535-X

work page doi:10.1016/s0921-5093(02)00535-x 2003

[7] [7]

, author Parihar, M.S

author Hadke, S. , author Parihar, M.S. , author Shekhawat, S. , author Khatirkar, R.K. , year 2016 . title A new method for automated reconstruction of pre-transformation microstructures . journal Philosophical Magazine Letters volume 96 , pages 175--182 . :10.1080/09500839.2016.1180436

arXiv 2016

[8] [8]

, author Wagner, F

author Humbert, M. , author Wagner, F. , author Moustahfid, H. , author Esling, C. , year 1995 . title Determination of the orientation of a parent grain from the orientations of the inherited plates in the phase transformation from body-centred cubic to hexagonal close packed . journal Journal of Applied Crystallography volume 28 , pages 571--576 . :10.1...

work page doi:10.1107/s0021889895004067 1995