Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 79 references

Multiwavelength high-resolution polarimetric imaging of second-generation disc around post-AGB binary IRAS 08544-4431 with SPHERE

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The circumbinary disc of IRAS 08544-4431 is resolved in optical scattered light with polarized brightness up to 1.5% of the stellar intensity, a grey polarimetric colour across V, I', and H, and a forward-scattering asymmetry.

desk verdict A careful, genuinely new optical polarimetric dataset for a post-AGB circumbinary disc; the grey-colour and porous-aggregate conclusions rest on assumptions the paper's own morphology table undermines. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17057 v1 pith:N2AWYXNQ submitted 2024-11-26 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.EP

Kateryna Andrych , Devika Kamath , Hans Van Winckel , Jacques Kluska , Hans Martin Schmid , Akke Corporaal , Julien Milli This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.EP
keywords post-AGBbinarycircumbinarydiscpolarimetricimagingSPHERE/ZIMPOLscatteredlightdustaggregatescoloursecond-generation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first optical multi-wavelength polarimetric imaging of a post-AGB circumbinary disc, resolving the disc around IRAS 08544-4431 in the V and I' bands with SPHERE/ZIMPOL and combining the result with previously published H-band IRDIS data. The disc shows azimuthally polarized scattered light reaching about 1.5% of the stellar intensity, a grey polarimetric colour across the three bands, and a forward-scattering asymmetry that places the near side of the disc to the north. The authors argue that these observed properties match the predicted scattering behaviour of large porous aggregates of submicron-sized monomers, which are also invoked for protoplanetary discs. If correct, this strengthens the analogy between second-generation discs around evolved binaries and planet-forming discs around young stars.

What carries the argument

The analysis is carried by azimuthally polarized intensity Q_phi, which isolates single scattering of stellar light on the disc surface and is used to measure disc brightness, morphology, and substructures. The photometric calibration relies on correction maps for PSF smearing and polarimetric cancellation applied to the V, I', and H bands, and the wavelength dependence is quantified with the logarithmic polarimetric colour index eta. The forward-scattering asymmetry and the grey colour are then compared with theoretical dust-scattering models for aggregates to infer the surface dust composition.

What would settle it

A radiative-transfer model that adopts a single disc inclination and scattering surface across the V, I', and H bands and predicts the polarized intensities; if the predicted colour is non-grey, then the observed grey colour is a geometric artifact rather than an intrinsic dust property.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the surface layers of the circumbinary disc around IRAS 08544-4431 scatter starlight with the same efficiency in the optical and near-infrared, producing a grey polarimetric colour (eta_V/I = 0.24 +/- 0.72 and eta_V/H = -0.24 +/- 0.34), while the resolved disc brightness is high at about 1% of the stellar intensity and is dominated by forward scattering. The disc is resolved in the V and I' bands as a bright elliptical ring with substructures, and the resolved surface appears more elliptical at shorter wavelengths, which the paper interprets as a possible sign of disc warping or shadowing. Combining these multi-wavelength polarimetric measurements, the paper concludes that the dust on the disc surface is consistent with large porous aggregates composed of submicron-sized monomers, matching the properties inferred for many protoplanetary discs.

Load-bearing premise

The colour comparison assumes the disc scatters light from the same geometry in all three bands, but the paper's own fits give different inclinations for the resolved ring in each band, so a geometric difference could produce the apparent grey colour.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the grey polarimetric colour is real, the disc surface dust is not dominated by small Rayleigh scatterers but by larger porous aggregates.
  • If the forward-scattering asymmetry is real, the northern part of the circumbinary disc is tilted toward the observer.
  • If the wavelength-dependent ring morphology is real, the disc may be warped or shadowed at shorter wavelengths.
  • The observed polarized brightness of about 1% of the stellar intensity places this post-AGB disc among the brightest protoplanetary discs, supporting the disc-evolution analogy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to fit the V, I', and H images with a single disc geometry; if the grey colour persists under a common inclination and scattering surface, it is a true dust property rather than a geometric artifact.
  • The wavelength-dependent ring ellipticity could be caused by the scattering surface height increasing with wavelength, which would be testable with high-resolution ALMA continuum observations of the disc midplane.
  • The close similarity to TW Hya suggests that large porous aggregates may be common in both post-AGB circumbinary discs and young protoplanetary discs, implying a shared dust-growth pathway despite very different formation histories.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents V- and I'-band ZIMPOL polarimetric imaging of the post-AGB binary IRAS 08544-4431, combined with previously published H-band IRDIS data, to characterize the circumbinary disc in scattered polarized light. The authors describe a detailed reduction: polarimetric differential imaging, frame selection, telescope polarization correction, subtraction of unresolved central polarization, PSF-smearing correction, SNR masking, and deconvolution. They measure polarized disc brightness of about 1.3-1.5% of the stellar intensity, fit an elliptical ring whose fitted inclination changes from 55 deg (V) to 40 deg (I') to 23 deg (H), find a forward-scattering asymmetry, and compute polarimetric colour gradients consistent with a grey disc. They conclude that the surface dust is dominated by large porous aggregates of submicron monomers and emphasize the similarity of this post-AGB disc to protoplanetary discs.

Significance. If the conclusions hold, this is the first optical multi-wavelength polarimetric study of a post-AGB circumbinary disc and provides quantitative constraints on dust scattering properties that can be compared directly with protoplanetary-disc studies. The data reduction is careful: the paper includes telescope-polarization correction, unresolved central polarization subtraction, PSF-smearing correction following Ma et al. (2024), SNR-based masking, and Richardson-Lucy deconvolution with a reference PSF. The central quantities (polarized brightness ratios, colour gradients, ellipse parameters) are falsifiable and presented with uncertainties. The comparison with external theoretical models (Tazaki & Dominik 2022) and with the compilation of Ma et al. (2024) is appropriate. However, as detailed below, the key 'grey colour and porous aggregates' conclusion currently depends on an assumption about constant scattering geometry that is inconsistent with the paper's own orientation measurements, and on PSF-smearing corrections whose orientation dependence has not been quantified. These issues are addressable with additional analysis, so the manuscript merits revision rather than rejection.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.4.1, Eq. (3), Table 2] The grey polarimetric colour, which is the basis for the porous-aggregate conclusion, is not statistically secure and is derived under the explicit assumption of 'similar scattering geometries across these wavelengths'. The measured gradients are eta_V/I = 0.24 ± 0.72 and eta_V/H = -0.24 ± 0.34; with these 1-sigma uncertainties the data are also fully consistent with significantly blue or red colours, so the classification 'grey' is only marginal. More importantly, Table 2 shows that the fitted inclination changes from 55 deg (V) to 40 deg (I') to 23 deg (H), so the geometry is demonstrably not the same across bands. If the resolved ring traces different surface elements or scattering angles in different bands, the measured gradients mix true dust scattering with geometric selection. The V-band ellipse in particular (a = 22 mas) is only marginally larger than the 30-mas pre-deconvolution resolution, and no validation with injected disc models is provided for the inclination fits. The authors should quantify the systematic effect on the colour gradients of using the actual V/I'/H orientations (e.g., by re-projecting to a common inclination or restricting the comparison to a common radial range), or should soften the grey-colour and dust-composition claims to reflect this degeneracy.
  2. [§3.2.5] The PSF-smearing correction maps used to derive the V- and I'-band polarized brightness were computed with the H-band orientation (i = 23 deg, PA = 121 deg), and consistency was checked only against IR interferometric orientation, not against the authors' own optical ellipse fits (i = 55 deg in V, i = 40 deg in I'; Table 2). Since Fig. 4 shows that the correction factor is large close to the binary, where a significant part of the measured Q_phi signal originates, an orientation mismatch could shift the V and I' corrected fluxes by more than the quoted uncertainties and thereby change both eta_V/I and eta_V/H. The authors should quantify this sensitivity, e.g., by recomputing the correction maps with the V and I' orientations and reporting the resulting brightness ratios.
  3. [§4.3.2 and §5.2] The forward-scattering asymmetry is inferred from a qualitative one-sided rise in the azimuthal brightness profile, without fitting a scattering phase function or accounting for the varying scattering angle along the inclined ring. In its current form this provides only weak, non-quantitative support for the micron-size grain interpretation. The authors should either fit a simple phase function (or at minimum report the contrast ratio between the two sides with uncertainties) or explicitly state that the porous-aggregate conclusion does not rely on the asymmetry.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.2.5] The text contains a typo, 'SPHERE/ZMPOL', which should read 'SPHERE/ZIMPOL'.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption says the white circles represent the size of the resolution element '(see Section 5)', but the resolution is defined in Section 3.2.6, not Section 5.
  3. [Eq. (3) and §4.4.1] The notation for the colour gradient can be made clearer: define exactly which intensity is used (Q_phi/I_tot) and specify that the wavelengths lambda are the central filter wavelengths; currently the relation between the labels V, I', H and the numerical values is only implicit.
  4. [§4.2] The definition of position angle as 'rising counterclockwise from the vertical axis (North)' is ambiguous; standard astronomical usage is 'east of north', which should be stated explicitly to avoid confusion with the usual mathematical convention.
  5. [§5.4] When comparing with protoplanetary discs, the phrase 'IRAS08544-4431 circumbinary disc among the brightest protoplanetary discs' should be phrased as 'among the brightest discs in terms of polarized intensity' to avoid implying this evolved system is itself a protoplanetary disc.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the polarimetric colour and dust conclusions rest on direct observables and external dust models; the band-dependent geometry is a stated validity caveat, not a circular step.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The polarized disc brightness values in Table 2 are direct measurements of Q_phi/Itot with documented corrections, and Eq. (3) is an explicit definition of polarimetric colour, not a fitted relation. The grey-colour conclusion is the application of the stated grey-colour interval to the measured eta values. The porous-aggregate interpretation is obtained by comparing three observed characteristics (polarized brightness, forward-scattering asymmetry, grey colour) with external theoretical model results in Tazaki & Dominik (2022) and Tazaki et al. (2019), so the conclusion is not encoded in the inputs. The reuse of the H-band orientation from Andrych et al. (2023) for the PSF-smearing correction map is a self-citation, but it is not load-bearing in a circular way: the orientation is an empirically measured quantity from an independent prior dataset, the correction is omitted when determining V- and I'-band morphology, and the paper checks the map against IR-interferometric orientations from Hillen et al. (2016) and Corporaal et al. (2023a). The explicit assumption of similar scattering geometries across bands in Section 4.4.1 is a validity condition for the dust-property interpretation; if the bands sample different surface elements, the colour index could be geometrically biased, but that is an accuracy concern rather than a case where a prediction reduces to its input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's conclusions rest on standard polarimetric-imaging assumptions (single scattering, projection geometry) and on qualitative comparison with external dust models. No new physical entities are introduced. The most fragile assumption is the wavelength-independent scattering geometry, which the paper itself challenges with its morphology results.

free parameters (4)
  • Frame selection fraction = 0.75
    Top 75% of polarimetric frames selected based on normalized peak PSF intensity (Section 3.2.2). This choice affects signal-to-noise and could bias results if correlated with disc polarization, but the paper shows a correlation and selects the better PSF frames.
  • Unresolved central polarization aperture radius = 3 pixels (~11 mas)
    Circular aperture used to estimate the unresolved central polarization (Section 3.2.4). Chosen to balance correction accuracy against resolved-signal contamination.
  • PSF correction map disc orientation = i=23 deg, PA=121 deg
    Orientation assumed when computing the PSF smearing correction map (Section 3.2.5), taken from H-band IRDIS results; affects corrected brightness values.
  • Deconvolution iteration count = 25
    Richardson-Lucy iterations stopped when pixel-to-pixel variation <1.5% (Section 3.2.7). Affects substructure morphology in deconvolved images.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Single scattering of stellar light dominates the polarization signal (Q_phi >= 85% of Ipol in V and >= 90% in I').
    Section 3.2.1: justifies using the azimuthal Stokes Q_phi as the disc polarization measure. If multiple scattering or instrumental polarization contributed significantly, the interpretation would change.
  • domain assumption The scattering geometry of the observed disc surface is similar across V, I', and H bands.
    Section 4.4.1: this assumption converts wavelength-dependent polarized brightness into a dust property. The paper's own wavelength-dependent morphology measurements (Section 4.4.2) put this assumption in question.
  • domain assumption The disc is intrinsically circular, so the apparent ellipticity is due to projection.
    Section 4.2, Eq. 1: used to derive inclinations from the major/minor axis ratio. Justified by radiative transfer modelling of the inner rim (Kluska et al. 2018), but applied to the outer resolved ring.
  • standard math Theoretical dust scattering models of porous aggregates (Tazaki and Dominik 2022) are applicable to post-AGB circumbinary discs.
    Section 5.2: the conclusion that surface dust is composed of large porous aggregates of submicron monomers rests on a qualitative comparison with these models.
  • domain assumption Interstellar polarization does not significantly contaminate the resolved disc polarization.
    Section 5.1: argued from wavelength dependence and comparison with field stars; the unresolved central polarization is attributed mainly to the disc, not the ISM.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multiwavelength high-resolution polarimetric imaging of second-generation disc around post-AGB binary IRAS 08544-4431 with SPHERE." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N2AWYXNQ

@misc{pith2026241117057,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multiwavelength high-resolution polarimetric imaging of second-generation disc around post-AGB binary IRAS 08544-4431 with SPHERE},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N2AWYXNQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17057}
}
read the original abstract

Exploring the formation and evolution of second-generation circumbinary discs around evolved binary stars, such as post-Asymptotic Giant Branch (post-AGB) and post-Red Giant Branch (post-RGB) binaries, provides valuable insights into the complex binary interaction process that concludes the red-giant phase of evolution in these systems. Additionally, it offers a novel opportunity to investigate the formation of second-generation planets within dusty discs surrounding evolved stars. We present a pilot multi-wavelength polarimetric imaging study of the post-AGB binary system IRAS 08544-4431 using the European Southern Observatory-Very Large Telescope/SPHERE instrument. This study is focused on optical V- and I'-band ZIMPOL data to complement near-infrared H-band IRDIS data presented previously. The study aims to investigate the dust scattering properties and surface morphology of the post-AGB circumbinary disc as a function of wavelength. We successfully resolved the extended disc structure of IRAS\,08544-4431, revealing a complex disc morphology, high polarimetric disc brightness (up to ~1.5%), and significant forward scattering at optical wavelengths. Additionally, we found that the disc shows a grey polarimetric colour in both optical and near-infrared. The findings highlight similarities between post-AGB circumbinary discs and protoplanetary discs, suggesting submicron-size porous aggregates as the dominant surface dust composition, and indicating potential warping within the disc. However, further expansion of the multi-wavelength analysis to a larger sample of post-AGB binary systems, as well as high-resolution observations of dust continuum and gas emission, is necessary to fully explore the underlying structure of post-AGB circumbinary discs and associated physical mechanisms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17057 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Measured fractional polarisation (𝑄/𝐼tot and 𝑈/𝐼tot) of IRAS 08544-4431 before (crosses) and after (squares) the correction of the telescope polarization (lines) in 𝑉 (red) and 𝐼 ′ (blue) bands. See Section 3.2.3 for more details. alongside the corresponding telescope polarization data for both 𝑉− and 𝐼 ′−bands of IRAS 08544-4431. The radius of the circle is de￾termined by the telescope polarization, which was deter… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The polarized signal of IRAS 08544-4431 before (top row) and after (bottom row) subtraction of the unresolved central polarization in 𝑉 (first and second column) and 𝐼 ′ (third and fourth column) bands. 𝑄𝜙 represents azimuthal polarized intensity, while 𝐼pol represents the total polarized signal. White circles in the left corner of each image represent the size of the resolution element (see Section 5). All images a… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Statistically significant regions (SNR≥ 5, marked with white con￾tour) of the 𝑄𝜙 images for IRAS 08544-4431 in 𝑉− and 𝐼 ′−bands. See Section 3.2.6 for more details [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Example of calculated PSF correction coefficients in 𝐻− (solid black line), 𝑉− (dashed red line) and 𝐼 ′−bands (dotted blue line) using observational PSF and a wide elliptical ring model with inclination and position angle similar to IRAS 08544-4431. See Section 3.2.5 …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Disc orientation results based on the Q𝜙 polarized intensity images of IRAS 08544-4431 (see Section 4.2 for more details). The red ellipses illustrate the most plausible PA and inclination of discs. The red cross in the centre of the images represents the centre of the…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Brightness profiles for IRAS 08544-4431 in 𝑉 (left panel) and 𝐼 ′ (right panel) bands (see Section 4.3.2) with corresponding 𝑄𝜙 images. In each panel, the left image displays the brightness profile, while the right image presents the corresponding 𝑄𝜙 image. The top row…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Combined 𝑄𝜙 polarized disc morphology for IRAS 08544-4431 using 𝑉 and 𝐼−band data from this study, along with the SPHERE/IRDIS 𝐻−band results (adapted from Andrych et al. (2023)). The black cross rep￾resents the position of the binary star. Before combining the 𝑄𝜙 ima…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Resolved polarized disc brightness (solid blue line) and degree of unresolved polarisation (dashed orange line) relative to the total intensity of IRAS 08544-4431 as a function of wavelength. See Section 4.4 for more details. We found that IRAS 08544-4431 shows 𝜂𝑉/𝐼 =…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Orientation and relative degree of unresolved central polarisation of IRAS 08544-4431 in 𝑉−, 𝐼 ′−, and 𝐻−bands presented over polarisation image of the system in SPHERE/ZIMPOL I-band. See Section 5.1 for more details. their wavelength dependency, encode details about …
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Polarized brightness measurements of the disc relative to the stellar intensity for IRAS 08544-4431 (in black, this study) and a sample of young stellar objects (T Tauri star discs marked with x and Herbig star discs with ▽ Ma et al. 2024). For a given disc the result…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Andrych K., Kamath D., Kluska J., Van Winckel H., Ertel S., Corporaal A., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1968 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524.4168A 524, 4168

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1968 2023

  2. [2]

    Avenhaus H., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab846 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...863...44A 863, 44

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab846 2018

  3. [3]

    Bailer-Jones C. A. L., Rybizki J., Fouesneau M., Demleitner M., Andrae R., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/abd806 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....161..147B 161, 147

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd806 2021

  4. [4]

    arXiv:2203.09991

    Benisty M., et al., 2022, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv220309991B p. arXiv:2203.09991

    arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    A., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature11805 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013Natur.493..644B 493, 644

    Bergin E. A., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature11805 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013Natur.493..644B 493, 644

    doi:10.1038/nature11805 2013

  6. [6]

    L., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935251 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...631A.155B 631, A155

    Beuzit J. L., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935251 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...631A.155B 631, A155

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935251 2019

  7. [7]

    Bollen D., Kamath D., Van Winckel H., De Marco O., Verhamme O., Kluska J., Wardle M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243429 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...666A..40B 666, A40

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243429 2022

  8. [8]

    A., Owen J

    Booth R. A., Owen J. E., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa578 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.493.5079B 493, 5079

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa578 2020

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    Bujarrabal V., Castro-Carrizo A., Alcolea J., Van Winckel H., S \'a nchez Contreras C., Santander-Garc \' a M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629317 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...597L...5B 597, L5

    2017 doi

  2. [10]

    Bujarrabal V., Castro-Carrizo A., Van Winckel H., Alcolea J., S \'a nchez Contreras C., Santander-Garc \' a M., Hillen M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201732422 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...614A..58B 614, A58

    2018 doi

  3. [11]

    R., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527267 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...582L...7C 582, L7

    Canovas H., M \'e nard F., de Boer J., Pinte C., Avenhaus H., Schreiber M. R., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527267 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...582L...7C 582, L7

    2015 doi

  4. [12]

    Corporaal A., Kluska J., Van Winckel H., Bollen D., Kamath D., Min M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141154 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...650L..13C 650, L13

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    Corporaal A., Kluska J., Van Winckel H., Kamath D., Min M., 2023a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245689 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...671A..15C 671, A15

    doi

  6. [14]

    Corporaal A., Kluska J., Van Winckel H., Andrych K., Cuello N., Kamath D., M \'e rand A., 2023b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346408 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674A.151C 674, A151

    doi

  7. [15]

    arXiv:2406.09280

    De Prins T., Van Winckel H., Ferreira J., Verhamme O., Kamath D., Zimniak N., Jacquemin-Ide J., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2406.09280 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240609280D p. arXiv:2406.09280

    2024 doi arXiv

  8. [16]

    Debes J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acbdf1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...948...36D 948, 36

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    Delorme P., et al., 2017, in Reyl \'e C., Di Matteo P., Herpin F., Lagadec E., Lan c on A., Meliani Z., Royer F., eds, SF2A-2017: Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the French Society of Astronomy and Astrophysics. p. Di ( @eprint arXiv 1712.06948 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.1712.06948

    2017 doi arXiv

  10. [18]

    S., Casali M

    Dohlen K., et al., 2008, in McLean I. S., Casali M. M., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 7014, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II. p. 70143L, @doi 10.1117/12.789786

    2008 doi

  11. [19]

    T., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094840 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ARA&A..41..241D 41, 241

    Draine B. T., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094840 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ARA&A..41..241D 41, 241

    2003 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Ertel S., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aafe04 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....157..110E 157, 110

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    Fukagawa M., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/62.2.347 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010PASJ...62..347F 62, 347

    2010 doi

  14. [22]

    Gallardo Cava I., G \'o mez-Garrido M., Bujarrabal V., Castro-Carrizo A., Alcolea J., Van Winckel H., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039604 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...648A..93G 648, A93

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    P., Schmid H

    Garufi A., Quanz S. P., Schmid H. M., Avenhaus H., Buenzli E., Wolf S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201424262 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...568A..40G 568, A40

    2014 doi

  16. [24]

    Garufi A., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201630320 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...603A..21G 603, A21

    2017 doi

  17. [25]

    Garufi A., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936946 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...633A..82G 633, A82

    2020 doi

  18. [26]

    Garufi A., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141692 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...658A.137G 658, A137

    2022 doi

  19. [27]

    Gielen C., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117364 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...533A..99G 533, A99

    2011 doi

  20. [28]

    Ginski C., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/abdf57 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...908L..25G 908, L25

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    Ginski C., Tazaki R., Dominik C., Stolker T., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acdc97 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...953...92G 953, 92

    2023 doi

  22. [30]

    arXiv:2403.02149

    Ginski C., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2403.02149 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240302149G p. arXiv:2403.02149

    2024 doi arXiv

  23. [31]

    Hardy A., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw976 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.459.4518H 459, 4518

    2016 doi

  24. [32]

    Heiles C., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301236 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AJ....119..923H 119, 923

    2000 doi

  25. [33]

    B., Van Winckel H., Berger J

    Hillen M., Kluska J., Le Bouquin J. B., Van Winckel H., Berger J. P., Kamath D., Bujarrabal V., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628125 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...588L...1H 588, L1

    2016 doi

  26. [34]

    Hunziker S., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202040166 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...648A.110H 648, A110

    2021 doi

  27. [35]

    R., Van Winckel H., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1202 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454.1468K 454, 1468

    Kamath D., Wood P. R., Van Winckel H., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1202 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454.1468K 454, 1468

    2015 doi

  28. [36]

    Keppler M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201832957 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...617A..44K 617, A44

    2018 doi

  29. [37]

    Kirchschlager F., Wolf S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201323176 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...568A.103K 568, A103

    2014 doi

  30. [38]

    Kluska J., Hillen M., Van Winckel H., Manick R., Min M., Regibo S., Royer P., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201832983 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...616A.153K 616, A153

    2018 doi

  31. [39]

    P., Kamath D., Le Bouquin J

    Kluska J., Van Winckel H., Hillen M., Berger J. P., Kamath D., Le Bouquin J. B., Min M., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935785 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...631A.108K 631, A108

    2019 doi

  32. [40]

    M., Dsilva K., Kamath D., Bujarrabal V., Min M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141690 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...658A..36K 658, A36

    Kluska J., Van Winckel H., Copp \'e e Q., Oomen G. M., Dsilva K., Kamath D., Bujarrabal V., Min M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141690 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...658A..36K 658, A36

    2022 doi

  33. [41]

    B., 1974, @doi [ ] 10.1086/111605 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974AJ.....79..745L 79, 745

    Lucy L. B., 1974, @doi [ ] 10.1086/111605 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974AJ.....79..745L 79, 745

    1974 doi

  34. [42]

    M., Tschudi C., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245697 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...676A...6M 676, A6

    Ma J., Schmid H. M., Tschudi C., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245697 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...676A...6M 676, A6

    2023 doi

  35. [43]

    M., Stolker T., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347782 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...683A..18M 683, A18

    Ma J., Schmid H. M., Stolker T., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347782 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...683A..18M 683, A18

    2024 doi

  36. [44]

    Maas T., Van Winckel H., Lloyd Evans T., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20041688 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...429..297M 429, 297

    2005 doi

  37. [45]

    M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321300 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...555A..64M 555, A64

    Maaskant K. M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321300 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...555A..64M 555, A64

    2013 doi

  38. [46]

    C., Huang J., Andrews S

    Mac \' as E., Guerra-Alvarado O., Carrasco-Gonz \'a lez C., Ribas \'A ., Espaillat C. C., Huang J., Andrews S. M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039812 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...648A..33M 648, A33

    2021 doi

  39. [47]

    J., Pinte C., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/sly209 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.484L.130M 484, L130

    Mentiplay D., Price D. J., Pinte C., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/sly209 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.484L.130M 484, L130

    2019 doi

  40. [48]

    Menu J., van Boekel R., Henning T., Leinert C., Waelkens C., Waters L. B. F. M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201525654 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...581A.107M 581, A107

    2015 doi

  41. [49]

    M., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526577 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...588A..25M 588, A25

    Miller Bertolami M. M., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526577 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...588A..25M 588, A25

    2016 doi

  42. [50]

    A., Masseron T., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae791 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.530..761M 530, 761

    Mohorian M., Kamath D., Menon M., Ventura P., Van Winckel H., Garc \' a-Hern \'a ndez D. A., Masseron T., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae791 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.530..761M 530, 761

    2024 doi

  43. [51]

    D., Min M., Dominik C., Debes J

    Mulders G. D., Min M., Dominik C., Debes J. H., Schneider G., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219522 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...549A.112M 549, A112

    2013 doi

  44. [52]

    Nealon R., Pinte C., Alexander R., Mentiplay D., Dipierro G., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz346 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.484.4951N 484, 4951

    2019 doi

  45. [53]

    Nomura H., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/819/1/L7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...819L...7N 819, L7

    2016 doi

  46. [54]

    Oomen G.-M., Van Winckel H., Pols O., Nelemans G., Escorza A., Manick R., Kamath D., Waelkens C., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833816 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...620A..85O 620, A85

    2018 doi

  47. [55]

    Oomen G.-M., Van Winckel H., Pols O., Nelemans G., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935853 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...629A..49O 629, A49

    2019 doi

  48. [56]

    M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf745 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...869L..50P 869, L50

    P \'e rez L. M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf745 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...869L..50P 869, L50

    2018 doi

  49. [57]

    H., 1972, Journal of the Optical Society of America (1917-1983), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1972JOSA...62...55R 62, 55

    Richardson W. H., 1972, Journal of the Optical Society of America (1917-1983), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1972JOSA...62...55R 62, 55

    1972

  50. [58]

    Schleicher D. R. G., Dreizler S., V \"o lschow M., Banerjee R., Hessman F. V., 2015, @doi [Astronomische Nachrichten] 10.1002/asna.201412184 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AN....336..458S 336, 458

    2015 doi

  51. [59]

    M., Joos F., Tschan D., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20053273 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...452..657S 452, 657

    Schmid H. M., Joos F., Tschan D., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20053273 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...452..657S 452, 657

    2006 doi

  52. [60]

    M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833620 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...619A...9S 619, A9

    Schmid H. M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833620 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...619A...9S 619, A9

    2018 doi

  53. [61]

    P., Ertel S., Hillen M., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa425 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494.2925S 494, 2925

    Scicluna P., Kemper F., Trejo A., Marshall J. P., Ertel S., Hillen M., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa425 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494.2925S 494, 2925

    2020 doi

  54. [62]

    S., Ford V

    Serkowski K., Mathewson D. S., Ford V. L., 1975, @doi [ ] 10.1086/153410 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1975ApJ...196..261S 196, 261

    1975 doi

  55. [63]

    Simmons J. F. L., Stewart B. G., 1985, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985A&A...142..100S 142, 100

    1985

  56. [64]

    Tazaki R., Dominik C., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243485 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...663A..57T 663, A57

    2022 doi

  57. [65]

    Tazaki R., Tanaka H., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aac32d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...860...79T 860, 79

    2018 doi

  58. [66]

    Tazaki R., Tanaka H., Muto T., Kataoka A., Okuzumi S., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz662 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.485.4951T 485, 4951

    2019 doi

  59. [67]

    M., Facchini S., Huang J., Wilner D., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac67a3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...930..144T 930, 144

    Teague R., Bae J., Benisty M., Andrews S. M., Facchini S., Huang J., Wilner D., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac67a3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...930..144T 930, 144

    2022 doi

  60. [68]

    M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141028 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...655A..37T 655, A37

    Tschudi C., Schmid H. M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141028 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...655A..37T 655, A37

    2021 doi

  61. [69]

    Verhamme O., Kluska J., Ferreira J., Bollen D., De Prins T., Kamath D., Van Winckel H., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347708 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...684A..79V 684, A79

    2024 doi

  62. [70]

    Versteeg M. J. F., Magalh \ a es A. M., Haverkorn M., Angarita Y., Rodrigues C. V., Santos-Lima R., Kawabata K. S., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aca8fd , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023AJ....165...87V 165, 87

    2023 doi

  63. [71]

    V., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322111 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...562A..19V 562, A19

    V \"o lschow M., Banerjee R., Hessman F. V., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322111 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...562A..19V 562, A19

    2014 doi

  64. [72]

    K., Alexander R., Rosotti G., Pinte C., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac840 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.513..487Y 513, 487

    Young A. K., Alexander R., Rosotti G., Pinte C., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac840 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.513..487Y 513, 487

    2022 doi

  65. [73]

    K., Stevenson S., Nixon C

    Young A. K., Stevenson S., Nixon C. J., Rice K., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2451 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525.2616Y 525, 2616

    2023 doi

  66. [74]

    R., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220321 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...549A..95Z 549, A95

    Zorotovic M., Schreiber M. R., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220321 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...549A..95Z 549, A95

    2013 doi

  67. [75]

    de Boer J., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834989 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...633A..63D 633, A63

    2020 doi

  68. [76]

    van Boekel R., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5d68 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...837..132V 837, 132

    2017 doi

  69. [77]

    G., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834996 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...633A..64V 633, A64

    van Holstein R. G., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834996 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...633A..64V 633, A64

    2020 doi

  70. [78]

    van Winckel H., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.071601.170018 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ARA&A..41..391V 41, 391

    2003

  71. [79]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.