Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 92 references

Non-extensive Hard Thermal Loop Resummation and Its Applications: Analysis in Zero and Finite Magnetic Fields

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Non-extensive q-statistics shifts hot-QCD Debye masses and lowers heavy-quarkonium melting temperatures, with a magnetic field pushing them back up.

desk verdict A careful first-order Tsallis deformation of HTL self-energies, but the uncontrolled expansion at q=1.2 makes the melting temperatures unreliable. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17090 v2 pith:MP6FDRJW submitted 2024-11-26 hep-ph

He-Xia Zhang , Yu-Xin Xiao This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph PACS 12.38.Mh25.75.Nq
keywords non-extensivestatisticshardthermalloopresummationquark-gluonplasmaDebyescreeningmassheavyquarkpotentialquarkoniumdissociationmagneticfieldeffectsreal-timefinite-temperaturetheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that non-extensive statistics changes how a quark-gluon plasma screens color charge, and that this should show up as earlier dissociation of heavy quarkonia. It extends hard thermal loop (HTL) resummation—the standard method for collecting infrared-sensitive thermal corrections into effective propagators—to q-deformed Bose-Einstein and Fermi-Dirac distributions, working to first order in $q-1$ in the real-time formalism. At zero chemical potential the central result is a q-dependent shift of the Debye masses, with the retarded/advanced mass obeying $\tilde m^2_{D,R}/m^2_D = 1+(21\zeta(3)/\pi^2-2)(q-1)$ and the symmetric mass obeying $\tilde m^2_{D,F}/m^2_D = 1+(42\zeta(3)/\pi^2-3)(q-1)$. Feeding these deformed self-energies through the resummed gluon propagator yields a heavy quark potential whose real part is more screened and whose imaginary part is larger as $q$ grows, so binding energies drop, decay widths broaden, and melting temperatures fall; a magnetic field acts in the opposite direction. If the paper is right, quarkonium melting temperatures extracted from ordinary thermal distributions may need to be revised downward in systems that are better described by non-extensive statistics.

What carries the argument

The central object is the q-deformed distribution function, formed by replacing the ordinary exponential with $\exp_q x=[1+(q-1)x]^{1/(q-1)}$ in the Bose-Einstein and Fermi-Dirac factors (eq. 2.1), and then expanded to first order in $q-1$ (eqs. 2.4–2.6). These distributions enter the real-time bare propagators, and the one-loop HTL integrals over hard momenta turn them into deformed self-energies. The load-bearing identities are the Debye-mass ratios $\tilde m^2_{D,R}/m^2_D = 1+(21\zeta(3)/\pi^2-2)(q-1)$ and $\tilde m^2_{D,F}/m^2_D = 1+(42\zeta(3)/\pi^2-3)(q-1)$; they carry all of the non-extensive physics at leading order. The propagator side of the machinery is the self-consistent resummation equation for the resummed retarded/advanced propagator, whose first-order piece is $\Pi_{R,(1)}/(G_R^{-1}-\Pi_{R,(0)})^2$, together with the equation for the symmetric propagator, whose non-extensive correction contains a combination encoding the departure from the equilibrium fluctuation-dissipation relation. This chain—deformed distributions, deformed self-energies, deformed propagators, then dielectric permittivity and potential—is what converts a statistical-mechanical parameter $q$ into an experimentally visible change in quarkonium survival.

What would settle it

Recompute the non-extensive HTL self-energies and heavy quark potential to second order in $q-1$ (or with the exact q-deformed distributions) at $q=1.2$ and check whether the Debye-mass shifts and melting temperatures change by more than a perturbatively expected few percent; if the first-order values are not within that tolerance, the predicted lowering of melting temperatures is not established.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's discovery is that non-extensivity enters the HTL effective theory through a single parameter-dependent shift of the Debye masses, and that the shift is different for the retarded/advanced and symmetric components of the gluon self-energy. With $\mu=0$, $N_f=3$, $N_c=3$, the paper obtains $\tilde m^2_{D,R}/m^2_D = 1+(21\zeta(3)/\pi^2-2)(q-1)$ and $\tilde m^2_{D,F}/m^2_D = 1+(42\zeta(3)/\pi^2-3)(q-1)$. Since $\zeta(3)\approx1.202$, both coefficients are positive, so for $q>1$ both masses increase; the symmetric mass increases more, making $\tilde m^2_{D,F}>\tilde m^2_{D,R}$ and breaking the equilibrium equality that connects fluctuation and dissipation. The same deformed self-energies are then used to construct the dielectric permittivity and, through a Fourier convolution of the Coulomb-plus-linear vacuum potential, the in-medium complex heavy quark potential. Solving the quantum mechanical bound-state equation with the real part and folding the imaginary part into the wavefunction, the paper finds $T_{\rm melt}$ decreases with $q$ for both J/$\Psi$ and $\Upsilon$ in zero field, and increases when $eB=15\,m_\pi^2$ is switched on: for J/$\Psi$ it is 0.254 GeV at $q=1$ and $eB=0$, 0.219 GeV at $q=1.2$, and 0.243 GeV at $q=1.2$ with $eB=15\,m_\pi^2$.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation is linearized in $q-1$, and the numerical scans at $q=1.2$ assume terms of order $(q-1)^2$ are negligible even though $(q-1)=0.2$ makes them comparable in size to the retained first-order corrections.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any $q>1$, the retarded Debye mass $\tilde m^2_{D,R}$ exceeds the standard $m^2_D$, so the medium screens the color Coulomb interaction more strongly; the real part of the heavy quark potential flattens and binding energies drop.
  • The symmetric Debye mass $\tilde m^2_{D,F}$ grows even faster than the retarded one, so the fluctuation-dissipation relation between the symmetric self-energy and the retarded/advanced ones is violated at first order in $q-1$.
  • Larger $q$ increases the magnitude of the imaginary part of the potential, broadening quarkonium decay widths; with both smaller binding and larger width, J/$\Psi$ and $\Upsilon$ melt at lower temperature.
  • A magnetic field $eB=15\,m_\pi^2$ raises the melting temperatures of both J/$\Psi$ and $\Upsilon$ at fixed $q$; at $q=1$ it shifts J/$\Psi$ from 0.254 to 0.270 GeV, and at $q=1.2$ from 0.219 to 0.243 GeV.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: because only first-order terms in $q-1$ are kept while the numerics use $q=1.2$, the quantitative melting temperatures should be read as indicative; a second-order or exact-$q$ evaluation could shift them by an $O(0.2)$ amount, and this is testable by repeating the calculation.
  • The paper does not compute radiative quantities, but the split between retarded and symmetric Debye masses implies that the photon and dilepton emission rate, which is controlled by the symmetric propagator, should also carry a $q$-dependent enhancement; measuring the dilepton spectrum could give an independent handle on $q$ in the plasma.
  • Since $q$ lowers $T_{\rm melt}$ and $eB$ raises it, the two effects could partially cancel; mapping the dissociation boundary in the $(q,eB)$ plane for J/$\Psi$ and $\Upsilon$ would separate non-extensive effects from magnetic-field effects in heavy-ion phenomenology.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript incorporates Tsallis non-extensive statistics into hard thermal loop (HTL) resummation in the real-time formalism. Starting from the non-extensive quark and gluon distributions (2.1), expanded to first order in (q−1), the authors compute the retarded/advanced and symmetric HTL gluon self-energies and the resummed propagators, both at zero magnetic field and in a finite magnetic field. From the resummed propagators they derive the dielectric permittivity and a complex heavy-quark potential, then solve a Schrödinger equation for the J/Ψ and Υ binding energies and compute decay widths, estimating melting temperatures from the criterion Γ(T_melt)=E_bin(T_melt). The central quantitative results are the Debye-mass shifts (3.21) and (3.40) and Table 1, which show that q>1 lowers the melting temperatures of heavy quarkonia while a magnetic field raises them.

Significance. If the quantitative predictions are reliable, the paper would provide a useful phenomenological extension of HTL resummation that connects non-extensive statistics to quarkonium observables in a QGP. The analytic derivations in Sections 3 and Appendices A–B are carefully laid out, the q→1 limit correctly recovers the standard Debye masses and resummed propagators, and the q=1 benchmark melting temperatures are consistent with the quoted lattice results. The distinction between retarded/advanced and symmetric Debye masses in the non-extensive setting is an interesting and nontrivial result, as is the anisotropic imaginary potential in a magnetic field. However, the quantitative claims for q>1 are not yet controlled because the first-order expansion in (q−1) is used at values as large as q=1.2, where the correction terms are not small; the reported melting temperatures are therefore conditional on a truncation that remains to be justified.

major comments (3)
  1. The first-order expansion in (q−1) is used for q=1.1 and q=1.2, but the expansion parameter at the hard momenta that dominate the HTL integrals is not small. The correction to the distribution functions is proportional to (q−1)(k∓μ)^2/(2T^2), which for q=1.2 equals 0.3 at k=√3 T and 0.9 at k=3T; the HTL loop integrals receive their main contributions from precisely this momentum range, so the statement after Eq. (2.5) that the HTL approximation 'satisfies this condition' is not substantiated. Moreover, the symmetric Debye-mass shift in Eq. (3.40) is 1 + (42ζ(3)/π^2 − 3)(q−1) ≈ 1 + 2.115(q−1), which is a 42% increase at q=1.2, while the retarded shift in Eq. (3.21) is 1 + (21ζ(3)/π^2 − 2)(q−1) ≈ 1 + 0.558(q−1). A 42% correction is not a small perturbation, and the neglected O((q−1)^2) terms are not estimated anywhere in the manuscript. Since Table 1 and the central claim that non-extensivity lowers the melting temperatures are produced from these linearized Debye masses, the central quantitative claim is not yet controlled. The authors should either evaluate the exact Tsallis integrals numerically or provide a rigorous truncation-error estimate and restrict the phenomenological conclusions to the range of q where the linearization is demonstrably valid.
  2. The melting temperatures are quoted to three significant figures with no estimate of uncertainties. The criterion Γ(T_melt)=E_bin(T_melt) is implemented using a Coulomb wave function and the simplified asymptotic form of the real potential described in Section 5; both approximations carry systematic uncertainties that are not quantified, and the q-dependence of those uncertainties is not assessed. The q=1 comparison with lattice QCD is encouraging, but without error estimates the reported differences between q=1, 1.1, and 1.2 (for example, J/Ψ at eB=0: 0.254 → 0.219 GeV) cannot be judged as statistically or systematically significant.
  3. The non-extensive corrections to the imaginary part of the heavy-quark potential and hence to the decay widths inherit the same uncontrolled linearization. In particular, the symmetric Debye-mass combination appearing in these expressions carries the large coefficient 2.115 in (q−1), so at q=1.2 the imaginary potential is modified by O(40%) corrections while only linear-order terms are retained. Before the conclusion that non-extensivity broadens the decay widths and lowers T_melt is accepted, the authors should demonstrate that higher-order terms in the Tsallis expansion do not change the sign or magnitude of these corrections.
minor comments (4)
  1. The caption states that all plots are performed 'at a fixed temperature of T = 0.3 GeV', but the horizontal axes of the same figures are temperature T; please clarify whether 0.3 GeV is a reference scale or remove the phrase.
  2. There are typographical errors: 'Braatten' should be 'Braaten', and the table label 'T able 1' contains an erroneous space.
  3. The phrase 'the differece between em2 D,R,B and emD,R reduces' contains a typo ('differece') and also an inconsistent notation: the comparison appears to be between em2 D,R,B and em2 D,R, not between a squared and an unsquared quantity; please make the notation uniform.
  4. The running coupling is written as α_s(Λ^2, eB) with a logarithm of Λ^2/(Λ^2+eB); since eB has mass dimension two, please specify the units used for eB and clarify the scale-setting prescription for the magnetic-field argument.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

The derivation is self-contained: the Debye-mass shifts and melting temperatures follow from the assumed non-extensive distributions, not from fitted parameters or self-citations that smuggle in the result.

full rationale

The central quantities (Eqs. 3.21 and 3.40) are obtained by inserting the linearly expanded Tsallis distributions, Eqs. (2.4)-(2.6), into the one-loop self-energy integrals (Eqs. 3.9-3.12 and 3.27-3.30) and evaluating the resulting Fermi/Bose moment integrals; the dimensionless coefficients aR and aF are defined as ratios of those moments, not as free parameters tuned to the final melting temperatures. The subsequent heavy-quark potential (Sections 4.1-4.2) and quarkonium observables (Section 5) are convolutions or Schrodinger-equation outputs of those self-energies, with the q=1 benchmark compared with lattice data in Table 1 as a post-hoc check rather than as an input. The one overlap with the authors' prior work, Ref. [23], supplies the Landau-level tensor structure L_mu_nu in Eq. (B.2); that is a published, parameter-free computation external to the present paper's target result, so under the review rules it counts as independent support and does not raise the circularity score. The paper's own caveat after Eq. (2.5) that the (q-1) expansion holds only when k/T is not too large is a legitimate numerical-control concern at q=1.2, but it concerns accuracy of truncation, not whether the result reduces to its input by construction. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing claim rests solely on a self-citation. Therefore no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results depend on the free parameter q and on several standard assumptions from the HTL and potential-model literature. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • q (non-extensive parameter) = 1.0, 1.1, 1.2
    The non-extensive parameter is taken from phenomenological Tsallis fits to transverse momentum spectra in heavy-ion collisions (refs. [42,47,66-69]). It is not fitted in this paper; it is scanned over representative values.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption HTL approximation: hard momenta k~T dominate loops, soft external momenta q~gT
    Used throughout Section 3 to reduce the self-energy integrals to logarithmic forms, standard in the literature.
  • standard math Tsallis q-exponential and q-deformed distributions as given in eqs. (2.1)-(2.2)
    Adopted from refs. [64,65]; the paper assumes this is the correct non-extensive generalization.
  • ad hoc to paper The expansion to first order in (q-1) is valid for the numerical range q in [1,1.2]
    The paper states q is close to 1 but uses q=1.2 without estimating higher-order terms.
  • domain assumption The dielectric permittivity formalism of refs. [78-80] connects the resummed propagator to the heavy quark potential
    Used in Section 4.1 to define ε^{-1} from G*_11 and to convolve with the Cornell potential.
  • domain assumption The scale hierarchy T² ~ eB ≫ g²T² in the magnetic field case
    Invoked in Section 3.2 to justify the HTL reduction and the neglect of certain Landau-level transitions.
  • domain assumption Melting temperature criterion Γ(T_melt) = E_bin(T_melt)
    Used in Section 5 to estimate T_melt, following ref. [86].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Non-extensive Hard Thermal Loop Resummation and Its Applications: Analysis in Zero and Finite Magnetic Fields." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MP6FDRJW

@misc{pith2026241117090,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Non-extensive Hard Thermal Loop Resummation and Its Applications: Analysis in Zero and Finite Magnetic Fields},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MP6FDRJW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17090}
}
abstract

The impact of non-extensive statistics on the hard thermal loop (HTL) resummation technique is investigated, in the absence and presence of a magnetic field. By utilizing the non-extensive bare propagators in the real-time formalism of finite temperature field theory, we determine the non-extensive deformations of both HTL gluon self-energies and resummed gluon propagators at the one-loop order. We observe that the introduction of non-extensivity results in distinct shifts in the Debye masses for the retarded/advanced and symmetric gluon self-energies. Applying the non-extensive modified resummed gluon propagators to obtain the dielectric permittivity of a quark-gluon plasma (QGP), we thereby derive the static heavy quark potential, which incorporates both short-range Yukawa and long-range string-like interactions between heavy quarks and the QGP medium. The real part of the potential exhibits increased screening as the non-extensive parameter $q$ ($q \geq 1$) increases, reducing the binding energies of heavy quarkonia. Furthermore, including non-extensivity enhances the magnitude of the imaginary part of the potential, causing a broadening in the decay widths of heavy quarkonia. Based on these observations, we estimate the melting temperatures of heavy quarkonia. Our results indicate that non-extensivity lowers the melting temperatures of heavy quarkonia, thus facilitating their dissociation, whereas the presence of a magnetic field inhibits this dissociation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    STAR collaboration, Experimental and theoretical challenges in the search for the quark gluon plasma: The STAR Collaboration ’s critical assessment of the evidence from RHIC collisions, Nucl. Phys. A 757 (2005) 102 [ nucl-ex/0501009]

    arXiv 2005

  2. [2]

    PHENIX collaboration, Formation of dense partonic matter in relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions at RHIC: Experimental evaluation by the PHENIX collaboration , Nucl. Phys. A 757 (2005) 184 [ nucl-ex/0410003]

    arXiv 2005

  3. [3]

    Deng and X.-G

    W.-T. Deng and X.-G. Huang, Event-by-event generation of electromagnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 85 (2012) 044907 [ 1201.5108]

    arXiv 2012

  4. [4]

    Skokov, A.Y

    V. Skokov, A.Y. Illarionov and V. Toneev, Estimate of the magnetic field strength in heavy-ion collisions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 24 (2009) 5925 [ 0907.1396]

    arXiv 2009

  5. [5]

    Voronyuk, V.D

    V. Voronyuk, V.D. Toneev, W. Cassing, E.L. Bratkovskaya, V.P. Konchakovski and S.A. Voloshin, (Electro-)Magnetic field evolution in relativistic heavy-ion collisions , Phys. Rev. C 83 (2011) 054911 [ 1103.4239]

    arXiv 2011

  6. [6]

    Toimela, Perturbative QED and QCD at Finite Temperatures and Densities , Int

    T. Toimela, Perturbative QED and QCD at Finite Temperatures and Densities , Int. J. Theor. Phys. 24 (1985) 901

    1985

  7. [7]

    Weldon, Covariant Calculations at Finite Temperature: The Relativistic Plasma , Phys

    H.A. Weldon, Covariant Calculations at Finite Temperature: The Relativistic Plasma , Phys. Rev. D 26 (1982) 1394

    1982

  8. [8]

    Frenkel and J.C

    J. Frenkel and J.C. Taylor, High Temperature Limit of Thermal QCD , Nucl. Phys. B 334 (1990) 199

    1990

Show all 92 references
  1. [9]

    Braaten and R.D

    E. Braaten and R.D. Pisarski, Simple effective Lagrangian for hard thermal loops , Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) R1827

    1992

  2. [10]

    Thoma, New developments and applications of thermal field theory , hep-ph/0010164

    M.H. Thoma, New developments and applications of thermal field theory , hep-ph/0010164

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    Elmfors, Hard thermal loops in a magnetic field and the chiral anomaly , Nucl

    P. Elmfors, Hard thermal loops in a magnetic field and the chiral anomaly , Nucl. Phys. B 487 (1997) 207 [ hep-ph/9608271]

    1997 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Kapusta, Finite Temperature Field Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989), 10.1017/CBO9780511535130

    J.I. Kapusta, Finite Temperature Field Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989), 10.1017/CBO9780511535130

    1989 doi

  5. [13]

    Bellac, Thermal Field Theory , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (3, 2011), 10.1017/CBO9780511721700

    M.L. Bellac, Thermal Field Theory , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (3, 2011), 10.1017/CBO9780511721700

    2011 doi

  6. [14]

    Andersen, L.E

    J.O. Andersen, L.E. Leganger, M. Strickland and N. Su, Three-loop HTL QCD thermodynamics, JHEP 08 (2011) 053 [ 1103.2528]

    2011 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Haque, A

    N. Haque, A. Bandyopadhyay, J.O. Andersen, M.G. Mustafa, M. Strickland and N. Su, Three-loop HTLpt thermodynamics at finite temperature and chemical potential , JHEP 05 (2014) 027 [ 1402.6907]

    2014 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Pisarski, Resummation and the gluon damping rate in hot QCD , Nucl

    R.D. Pisarski, Resummation and the gluon damping rate in hot QCD , Nucl. Phys. A 525 (1991) 175

    1991

  9. [17]

    Mrowczynski and M.H

    S. Mrowczynski and M.H. Thoma, Hard loop approach to anisotropic systems , Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 036011 [ hep-ph/0001164]

    2000 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Thoma, Applications of high temperature field theory to heavy ion collisions , hep-ph/9503400

    M.H. Thoma, Applications of high temperature field theory to heavy ion collisions , hep-ph/9503400. – 38 –

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    Burnier and A

    Y. Burnier and A. Rothkopf, A gauge invariant Debye mass and the complex heavy-quark potential, Phys. Lett. B 753 (2016) 232 [ 1506.08684]

    2016 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Laine, A Resummed perturbative estimate for the quarkonium spectral function in hot QCD, JHEP 05 (2007) 028 [ 0704.1720]

    M. Laine, A Resummed perturbative estimate for the quarkonium spectral function in hot QCD, JHEP 05 (2007) 028 [ 0704.1720]

    2007 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Laine, O

    M. Laine, O. Philipsen, P. Romatschke and M. Tassler, Real-time static potential in hot QCD, JHEP 03 (2007) 054 [ hep-ph/0611300]

    2007 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Beraudo, J.P

    A. Beraudo, J.P. Blaizot and C. Ratti, Real and imaginary-time Q anti-Q correlators in a thermal medium, Nucl. Phys. A 806 (2008) 312 [ 0712.4394]

    2008 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Zhang and E

    H.-X. Zhang and E. Wang, Responses of quark-antiquark interactions and heavy quark dynamics to magnetic fields , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 074034 [ 2301.09110]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Caron-Huot and G.D

    S. Caron-Huot and G.D. Moore, Heavy quark diffusion in perturbative QCD at next-to-leading order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 052301 [ 0708.4232]

    2008 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Moore and D

    G.D. Moore and D. Teaney, How much do heavy quarks thermalize in a heavy ion collision? , Phys. Rev. C 71 (2005) 064904 [ hep-ph/0412346]

    2005 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Fukushima, K

    K. Fukushima, K. Hattori, H.-U. Yee and Y. Yin, Heavy Quark Diffusion in Strong Magnetic Fields at Weak Coupling and Implications for Elliptic Flow , Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 074028 [1512.03689]

    2016 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Burnier, M

    Y. Burnier, M. Laine and M. Vepsalainen, Heavy quarkonium in any channel in resummed hot QCD , JHEP 01 (2008) 043 [ 0711.1743]

    2008 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Braaten, R.D

    E. Braaten, R.D. Pisarski and T.-C. Yuan, Production of Soft Dileptons in the Quark - Gluon Plasma , Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 (1990) 2242

    1990

  21. [29]

    Wong, The Production of soft dileptons in the quark - gluon plasma in resummed perturbation theory, Z

    S.M.H. Wong, The Production of soft dileptons in the quark - gluon plasma in resummed perturbation theory, Z. Phys. C 53 (1992) 465

    1992

  22. [30]

    Thoma and M

    M.H. Thoma and M. Gyulassy, Quark Damping and Energy Loss in the High Temperature QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 351 (1991) 491

    1991

  23. [31]

    Romatschke and M

    P. Romatschke and M. Strickland, Collective modes of an anisotropic quark gluon plasma , Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 036004 [ hep-ph/0304092]

    2003 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Romatschke and M

    P. Romatschke and M. Strickland, Collective modes of an anisotropic quark-gluon plasma II , Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 116006 [ hep-ph/0406188]

    2004 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Kasmaei and M

    B.S. Kasmaei and M. Strickland, Parton self-energies for general momentum-space anisotropy, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 054022 [ 1801.00863]

    2018 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Dumitru, Y

    A. Dumitru, Y. Guo and M. Strickland, The Imaginary part of the static gluon propagator in an anisotropic (viscous) QCD plasma , Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 114003 [ 0903.4703]

    2009 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Q. Du, A. Dumitru, Y. Guo and M. Strickland, Bulk viscous corrections to screening and damping in QCD at high temperatures , JHEP 01 (2017) 123 [ 1611.08379]

    2017 arXiv

  28. [36]

    L. Dong, Y. Guo, A. Islam, A. Rothkopf and M. Strickland, The complex heavy-quark potential in an anisotropic quark-gluon plasma — Statics and dynamics , JHEP 09 (2022) 200 [2205.10349]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Dumitru, Y

    A. Dumitru, Y. Guo, A. Mocsy and M. Strickland, Quarkonium states in an anisotropic QCD plasma , Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 054019 [ 0901.1998]. – 39 –

    2009 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Thakur, N

    L. Thakur, N. Haque and Y. Hirono, Heavy quarkonia in a bulk viscous medium , JHEP 06 (2020) 071 [ 2004.03426]

    2020 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Thakur and Y

    L. Thakur and Y. Hirono, Spectral functions of heavy quarkonia in a bulk-viscous quark gluon plasma, JHEP 02 (2022) 207 [ 2111.08225]

    2022 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Thakur, N

    L. Thakur, N. Haque, U. Kakade and B.K. Patra, Dissociation of quarkonium in an anisotropic hot QCD medium , Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 054022 [ 1212.2803]

    2013 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Tsallis, Possible Generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs Statistics , J

    C. Tsallis, Possible Generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs Statistics , J. Statist. Phys. 52 (1988) 479

    1988

  34. [42]

    Wilk and Z

    G. Wilk and Z. Wlodarczyk, On the interpretation of nonextensive parameter q in Tsallis statistics and Levy distributions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 2770 [ hep-ph/9908459]

    2000 arXiv

  35. [43]

    M. Shao, L. Yi, Z. Tang, H. Chen, C. Li and Z. Xu, Examine the species and beam-energy dependence of particle spectra using Tsallis Statistics , J. Phys. G 37 (2010) 085104 [0912.0993]

    2010 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Wong and G

    C.-Y. Wong and G. Wilk, Tsallis fits to pT spectra and multiple hard scattering in pp collisions at the LHC , Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 114007 [ 1305.2627]

    2013 arXiv

  37. [45]

    G. Che, J. Gu, W. Zhang and H. Zheng, Identified particle spectra in Pb–Pb, Xe–Xe and p–Pb collisions with the Tsallis blast-wave model , J. Phys. G 48 (2021) 095103 [2010.14880]

    2021 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Z. Tang, Y. Xu, L. Ruan, G. van Buren, F. Wang and Z. Xu, Spectra and radial flow at RHIC with Tsallis statistics in a Blast-Wave description , Phys. Rev. C 79 (2009) 051901 [0812.1609]

    2009 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Alberico, A

    W.M. Alberico, A. Lavagno and P. Quarati, Nonextensive statistics, fluctuations and correlations in high-energy nuclear collisions , Eur. Phys. J. C 12 (2000) 499 [nucl-th/9902070]

    2000 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Huovinen and H

    P. Huovinen and H. Petersen, Particlization in hybrid models , Eur. Phys. J. A 48 (2012) 171 [1206.3371]

    2012 arXiv

  41. [49]

    ALICE collaboration, Transverse momentum spectra of charged particles in proton-proton collisions at √s = 900 GeV with ALICE at the LHC , Phys. Lett. B 693 (2010) 53 [1007.0719]

    2010 arXiv

  42. [50]

    PHENIX collaboration, Measurement of neutral mesons in p+p collisions at √s= 200 GeV and scaling properties of hadron production , Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 052004 [ 1005.3674]

    2011 arXiv

  43. [51]

    J. Chen, J. Deng, Z. Tang, Z. Xu and L. Yi, Nonequilibrium kinetic freeze-out properties in relativistic heavy ion collisions from energies employed at the RHIC beam energy scan to those available at the LHC , Phys. Rev. C 104 (2021) 034901 [ 2012.02986]

    2021 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Y. Su, Y. Sun, Y. Zhang and X. Chen, Non-extensive statistical distributions of charmed meson production in Pb-Pb and pp( p) collisions , Nucl. Sci. Tech. 32 (2021) 108 [2109.14386]

    2021 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Sharma and M

    S. Sharma and M. Kaur, Multiplicity spectra in pp collisions at high energies in terms of Gamma and Tsallis distributions , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 034008 [ 1802.05587]

    2018 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Alqahtani, N

    M. Alqahtani, N. Demir and M. Strickland, Nonextensive hydrodynamics of boost-invariant plasmas, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 973 [ 2203.14968]

    2022 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Biro and E

    T.S. Biro and E. Molnar, Fluid dynamical equations and transport coefficients of relativistic gases with non-extensive statistics , Phys. Rev. C 85 (2012) 024905 [ 1109.2482]. – 40 –

    2012 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Osada and G

    T. Osada and G. Wilk, Nonextensive hydrodynamics for relativistic heavy-ion collisions , Phys. Rev. C 77 (2008) 044903 [ 0710.1905]

    2008 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Gervino, A

    G. Gervino, A. Lavagno and D. Pigato, Nonextensive statistical effects in the quark-gluon plasma formation at relativistic heavy-ion collisions energies , Central Eur. J. Phys. 10 (2012) 594 [ 1202.3091]

    2012 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Kyan and A

    K. Kyan and A. Monnai, QCD equation of state with Tsallis statistics for heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 054004 [ 2205.01742]

    2022 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Bhattacharyya, J

    T. Bhattacharyya, J. Cleymans and S. Mogliacci, Analytic results for the Tsallis thermodynamic variables, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 094026 [ 1608.08965]

    2016 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Tiwari, S

    S.K. Tiwari, S. Tripathy, R. Sahoo and N. Kakati, Dissipative Properties and Isothermal Compressibility of Hot and Dense Hadron Gas using Non-extensive Statistics , Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 938 [ 1709.06352]

    2018 arXiv

  53. [61]

    R. Rath, S. Tripathy, B. Chatterjee, R. Sahoo, S. Kumar Tiwari and A. Nath, Violation of Wiedemann-Franz Law for Hot Hadronic Matter created at NICA, F AIR and RHIC Energies using Non-extensive Statistics , Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (2019) 125 [ 1902.07922]

    2019 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Rozynek and G

    J. Rozynek and G. Wilk, Nonextensive effects in the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model of QCD , J. Phys. G 36 (2009) 125108 [ 0905.3408]

    2009 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Lavagno, D

    A. Lavagno, D. Pigato and P. Quarati, Nonextensive statistical effects in the hadron to quark-gluon phase transition , J. Phys. G 37 (2010) 115102 [ 1005.4643]

    2010 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Hasegawa, Bose-einstein and fermi-dirac distributions in nonextensive quantum statistics: Exact and interpolation approaches , Phys

    H. Hasegawa, Bose-einstein and fermi-dirac distributions in nonextensive quantum statistics: Exact and interpolation approaches , Phys. Rev. E 80 (2009) 011126

    2009

  57. [65]

    Rahaman, T

    M. Rahaman, T. Bhattacharyya and J.-e. Alam, Thermal Field Theory of the Tsallis statistics, 1906.02893

    1906 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Alberico and A

    W.M. Alberico and A. Lavagno, Non-extensive statistical effects in high-energy collisions , Eur. Phys. J. A 40 (2009) 313 [ 0901.4952]

    2009 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Lavagno, Relativistic nonextensive thermodynamics , Phys

    A. Lavagno, Relativistic nonextensive thermodynamics , Phys. Lett. A 301 (2002) 13 [cond-mat/0207353]

    2002 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Biyajima, M

    M. Biyajima, M. Kaneyama, T. Mizoguchi and G. Wilk, Analyses of k(t) distributions at RHIC by means of some selected statistical and stochastic models , Eur. Phys. J. C 40 (2005) 243 [hep-ph/0403063]

    2005 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Biyajima, T

    M. Biyajima, T. Mizoguchi, N. Nakajima, N. Suzuki and G. Wilk, Modified Hagedorn formula including temperature fluctuation - Estimation of temperatures at RHIC experiments -, Eur. Phys. J. C 48 (2006) 597 [ hep-ph/0602120]

    2006 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Rahaman, T

    M. Rahaman, T. Bhattacharyya and J.-e. Alam, Phenomenological Tsallis distribution from thermal field theory , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 36 (2021) 2150154

    2021

  63. [71]

    Chou, Z.-b

    K.-c. Chou, Z.-b. Su, B.-l. Hao and L. Yu, Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Formalisms Made Unified, Phys. Rept. 118 (1985) 1

    1985

  64. [72]

    Keldysh, Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes , Zh

    L.V. Keldysh, Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes , Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 47 (1964) 1515

    1964

  65. [73]

    Carrington and U.W

    M.E. Carrington and U.W. Heinz, Three point functions at finite temperature , Eur. Phys. J. C 1 (1998) 619 [ hep-th/9606055]. – 41 –

    1998 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Kurian, S.K

    M. Kurian, S.K. Das and V. Chandra, Heavy quark dynamics in a hot magnetized QCD medium, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 074003 [ 1907.09556]

    2019 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Eichten, K

    E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, J.B. Kogut, K.D. Lane and T.-M. Yan, The Spectrum of Charmonium , Phys. Rev. Lett. 34 (1975) 369

    1975

  68. [76]

    Matsui and H

    T. Matsui and H. Satz, J/ψ Suppression by Quark-Gluon Plasma Formation , Phys. Lett. B 178 (1986) 416

    1986

  69. [77]

    Jacobs, M.G

    S. Jacobs, M.G. Olsson and C. Suchyta, III, Comparing the Schrodinger and Spinless Salpeter Equations for Heavy Quark Bound States , Phys. Rev. D 33 (1986) 3338

    1986

  70. [78]

    Thakur, U

    L. Thakur, U. Kakade and B.K. Patra, Dissociation of Quarkonium in a Complex Potential , Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 094020 [ 1401.0172]

    2014 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Agotiya, V

    V. Agotiya, V. Chandra and B.K. Patra, Dissociation of quarkonium in hot QCD medium: Modification of the inter-quark potential , Phys. Rev. C 80 (2009) 025210 [ 0808.2699]

    2009 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Thakur, N

    L. Thakur, N. Haque and H. Mishra, Heavy quarkonium moving in hot and dense deconfined nuclear matter, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 036014 [ 1611.04568]

    2017 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Satz, Colour deconfinement and quarkonium binding , J

    H. Satz, Colour deconfinement and quarkonium binding , J. Phys. G 32 (2006) R25 [hep-ph/0512217]

    2006 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Ayala, C.A

    A. Ayala, C.A. Dominguez, S. Hernandez-Ortiz, L.A. Hernandez, M. Loewe, D. Manreza Paret et al., Thermomagnetic evolution of the QCD strong coupling , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 031501 [ 1805.08198]

    2018 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Bazavov, N

    A. Bazavov, N. Brambilla, X. Garcia i Tormo, P. Petreczky, J. Soto and A. Vairo, Determination of αs from the QCD static energy , Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 114031 [1205.6155]

    2012 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Brambilla, M.A

    N. Brambilla, M.A. Escobedo, J. Ghiglieri and A. Vairo, Thermal width and gluo-dissociation of quarkonium in pNRQCD , JHEP 12 (2011) 116 [ 1109.5826]

    2011 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Jamal, I

    M.Y. Jamal, I. Nilima, V. Chandra and V.K. Agotiya, Dissociation of heavy quarkonia in an anisotropic hot QCD medium in a quasiparticle model , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 094033 [1805.04763]

    2018 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Mocsy and P

    A. Mocsy and P. Petreczky, Color screening melts quarkonium , Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 211602 [0706.2183]

    2007 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Lafferty and A

    D. Lafferty and A. Rothkopf, Improved Gauss law model and in-medium heavy quarkonium at finite density and velocity , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 056010 [ 1906.00035]

    2020 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Landsman and C.G

    N.P. Landsman and C.G. van Weert, Real and Imaginary Time Field Theory at Finite Temperature and Density, Phys. Rept. 145 (1987) 141

    1987

  81. [89]

    Y. Wang, Q. Du and Y. Guo, Real-time hard-thermal-loop gluon self-energy in a semiquark-gluon plasma , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 054033 [ 2207.06039]

    2022 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Gorda, R

    T. Gorda, R. Paatelainen, S. S¨ appi and K. Sepp¨ anen,Soft gluon self-energy at finite temperature and density: hard NLO corrections in general covariant gauge , JHEP 08 (2023) 021 [2304.09187]

    2023 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Hattori and K

    K. Hattori and K. Itakura, Vacuum birefringence in strong magnetic fields: (II) Complex refractive index from the lowest Landau level , Annals Phys. 334 (2013) 58 [ 1212.1897]

    2013 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Fukushima, Magnetic-field Induced Screening Effect and Collective Excitations , Phys

    K. Fukushima, Magnetic-field Induced Screening Effect and Collective Excitations , Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 111501 [ 1103.4430]. – 42 –

    2011 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.