Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 47 references

Boulder migration in the Khonsu region of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A ~30-meter boulder on comet 67P shifted ~140 meters within a 14-hour window on 2015 October 3, and the authors propose that uneven heating and outgassing of the boulder itself helped trigger the displacement.

desk verdict Useful and honest paper that narrows a 67P boulder migration to a 14-hour window, but the marquee claim sits on a 1.5-pixel visual identification against a shape model that contains the boulder at both locations—so the number is plausible but not yet airtight. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17108 v1 pith:H5DLTDWE submitted 2024-11-26 astro-ph.EP

Xiang Tang , Xian Shi , Mohamed Ramy El-Maarry This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords comet67PbouldermigrationKhonsuregionRosettamissionOSIRISimagesthermophysicalmodelingactivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper revisits the largest boulder movement seen on comet 67P: a ~30-meter boulder in the Khonsu region that shifted ~140 meters between August and October 2015. By matching OSIRIS images to synthetic views generated from the SHAP7 shape model, the authors constrain the migration to a single 14-hour interval on 2015 October 3, showing the boulder moved suddenly rather than creeping. They also detect night-time mini-outbursts near the boulder's new location on the migration day and the next day. Thermophysical modeling reveals a sharp thermal dichotomy between the boulder's southern and northern sides, with the southern side receiving twice the insolation and reaching peak subsurface temperature at the time of movement. On this basis they propose a third triggering mechanism: the boulder's own uneven outgassing could have produced a net 'rocket force,' possibly acting alongside an outburst or seismic shaking.

What carries the argument

The central tool is synthetic-image matching against the stereo-photogrammetric SHAP7 shape model of comet 67P (~4 m horizontal resolution, 1 million vertices). Because the shape model was built from images spanning the whole mission, it contains the migrating boulder at both its original and final locations, so synthetic views with realistic ray-traced illumination can be blinked against actual low-resolution OSIRIS images (~20 m/pixel) to tell which side of the migration the boulder is on. The second component is a 1-D facet-wise thermophysical model that conserves energy and volatile mass, used to reconstruct the diurnal and orbital temperature and sublimation-flux history of the boulder's southern and northern sides. Together these yield the 14-hour timing constraint and the thermal asymmetry that underpins the proposed 'rocket force' mechanism.

What would settle it

If a reprojection of the October 3 09:26 or 22:49 images with a refined shape model or slightly different camera pointing placed the boulder's shadow on the opposite side of the migration, or if a higher-resolution image from the same day under better illumination showed the boulder absent from both locations, the 14-hour window would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the ~30-m boulder in Khonsu migrated ~140 m on 2015 October 3 between 09:26 and 22:49 UTC, a window of under 14 hours, by blinking OSIRIS NAC images against synthetic renders of the SHAP7 shape model. This makes the displacement a sudden event rather than a gradual process. The same analysis finds a mini-outburst at 19:30 UTC on the migration day emanating from near the boulder's new location, and another mini-outburst two rotations later, plus a jet on October 9. Facet-wise thermophysical modeling shows the boulder's southern side had been illuminated almost continuously for over 150 rotations, received roughly twice the cumulative insolation of the northern side, and reached orbital-maximum temperatures near 225 K at 10 cm depth at the time of migration, while the northern side was in a cold 'winter' state. The authors therefore argue that asymmetric sublimation from the boulder's own interior could have exerted a net propulsion toward the north, complementing the earlier hypotheses of direct outburst, erosion, or seismic destabilization; the actual trigger may have been a combination.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the SHAP7 shape model, with its ~4-meter horizontal resolution, faithfully represents the 30-meter boulder and its surroundings in both the pre- and post-migration states, so that the boulder's shadow in ~20 m/pixel images can be trusted to place it at one location or the other.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 14-hour constraint shows the boulder moved in a sudden, event-like displacement rather than through gradual creep, since the window is barely longer than one 12.4-hour rotation.
  • Night-time mini-outbursts occurred on the migration day and the following rotation near the boulder's new position, indicating a spatial and temporal link between local dust activity and the displacement.
  • Thermal modeling predicts that at migration time the boulder's southern side, 10 cm below the surface, was at its orbital maximum temperature (~225 K), a state favorable for sublimation of volatiles at depth.
  • If uneven outgassing contributed, large boulders on comets can act as self-propelled objects, a mechanism that has not been considered for tens-of-meters-scale blocks before.
  • The two Khonsu 'jumping boulders' may share a common triggering scenario, either ejection by an outburst or self-propulsion, though the other boulder's original position is unknown.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the migration truly happened in the afternoon of October 3, the peak in surface temperature on the boulder's southern side (~15:00 UTC) points to a thermal-stress or sublimation trigger; one could test this by checking whether other large boulder displacements on 67P cluster in local afternoon.
  • The proposed self-propulsion mechanism would be most convincing if the boulder's actual shape produces a net force direction roughly downslope; a numerical simulation using the SHAP7 facet geometry and the modeled outgassing could show whether the estimated acceleration is sufficient to overcome static friction on a ~25° slope.
  • The synthetic-image matching technique, treating a moving object as present at two locations in a single shape model, could be applied to other candidate surface changes on 67P (e.g., the other Khonsu boulder) to shrink their timing windows.
  • A direct search for fresh albedo or exposure changes at the original site using the highest-resolution post-migration images, or a re-analysis with a shape model that excludes the boulder's dual presence, would test whether the identification at the new location is robust.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reanalyzes Rosetta/OSIRIS imaging to constrain the timing of a ~30 m boulder's ~140 m displacement in the Khonsu region of comet 67P. Using the SHAP7 stereo-photogrammetric shape model and synthetic-image matching, it claims the boulder was still at its original position at 09:26 UTC on 2015 October 3 and had arrived at its new position by 22:49 UTC, yielding a migration window of within 14 hours. The paper also reports night-time mini-outbursts near the new location, documents morphological changes in the surrounding area, and applies a 1-D thermophysical model (Hu & Shi 2021) to local facets. The model shows a pronounced insolation and temperature dichotomy between the boulder's southern and northern sides, and the authors propose that the boulder's own sublimation-driven activity may have contributed to or triggered the migration.

Significance. If the 14-hour timing claim withstands scrutiny, it would be the best-constrained large-boulder migration event observed on a cometary nucleus, demonstrating a sudden, burst-like displacement rather than gradual creep, and enabling a direct search for coincident activity. The paper exploits unique Rosetta data, provides a clear observational catalog in Table 1, and uses a published thermophysical model without tuning its parameters to reproduce the migration, which is a methodological strength. However, the central timing constraint rests on identifying a ~2-pixel boulder in ~20 m/pix images, and the synthetic comparisons are partly circular because the shape model contains the boulder at both its pre- and post-migration locations. The proposed self-propulsion mechanism is also quantitatively weak by the authors' own estimate. These issues need to be addressed before the central claims can be considered robust.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.1, Fig. 4; Sec. 3, Fig. 1a] The 14-hour migration window is based on visually matching ~20 m/pix NAC images against synthetic renderings of SHAP7, a shape model that contains the boulder at both its pre- and post-migration positions because it was derived from images spanning the migration (Sec. 3, Fig. 1a). Consequently, the synthetic image used for the 09:26 detection contains a boulder at the original location by construction, so agreement between the real and synthetic images does not independently establish the boulder's presence there at 09:26. The paper provides no quantitative match metric, residual map, or pointing/registration uncertainty for this key detection. If the 'lengthened shadow' at 09:26 is not uniquely attributable to the boulder, the constraint degrades to the Sep 26 - Oct 3 interval. Please add a quantitative registration analysis, for example by measuring residuals against fixed landmarks and by testing whether masking the boulder in the shape model removes the observed signal at the original location.
  2. [Sec. 3.3, Fig. 6a] The paper states that the source of the 19:30 mini-outburst is 'unclear whether the outburst is from the unilluminated boulder itself or its surroundings,' and that 'the identification of the boulder at its new location is subject to the accuracy of the shape model.' These admissions are important: the coincident dust activity on October 3 is not established to be directly associated with the migration, and the boulder's arrival at the new location by 22:49 is not as secure as the text in Sec. 3.1 implies. The timeline in Fig. 7 should visibly distinguish confirmed boulder locations from activity whose source is ambiguous, and the 'coincident activity' interpretation should be softened accordingly.
  3. [Sec. 4; Sec. 5.3] The proposed self-propulsion scenario (Scenario C) is not quantitatively supported by the paper's own numbers: a mean water-vapor flux of ~3.2 x 10^-5 kg m^-2 s^-1 at facet S yields an acceleration of ~2 x 10^-5 m s^-2, one order of magnitude smaller than the local gravitational acceleration of ~2 x 10^-4 m s^-2. The paper acknowledges this shortfall but nonetheless presents the mechanism as viable. To make Scenario C convincing, the authors need to show how the net force could exceed gravity, for example by invoking supervolatile (CO2) sublimation at depth or by computing the reduced force needed to initiate rolling on a ~25-degree slope. As written, Scenario C is a qualitative suggestion rather than a demonstrated mechanism.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Table 2] The symbol f0 is used for both the dust volume-filling fraction (0.2) and the initial ice volume fraction (0.1); please use distinct symbols to avoid ambiguity in the parameter definitions.
  2. [Sec. 3.1] The statement that the boulder 'extends over only two pixels' is slightly inconsistent with a ~30 m boulder at ~19-20 m/pix, which corresponds to roughly 1.5 pixels; please phrase this as 'one to two pixels.'
  3. [Eqs. (1)-(2) and Sec. 4] The model equations do not explicitly state the surface boundary condition that couples the sublimation flux to the surface energy balance; a pointer to Hu & Shi (2021) is given, but a short statement of the surface boundary condition would make the reported flux values in Fig. 10 reproducible by the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the 14-hour migration window is an observational timing constraint, and the thermophysical model is a non-fitted interpretive tool.

full rationale

The paper's central result—that the Khonsu boulder migrated within about 14 hours on 2015 October 3—is an observational timing constraint. It is derived by comparing two NAC images (09:26 and 22:49 UTC) and identifying shadow signatures of the boulder, not by fitting a model to the displacement. The SHAP7 shape model is used as a template for synthetic image comparison, and the authors acknowledge the identification at the new location is 'subject to the accuracy of the shape model' (Sec. 3.3). Although SHAP7 contains the boulder at both pre- and post-migration locations because it was constructed from images spanning August 2014 to February 2016, that dual existence does not encode the 14-hour timing; the temporal assignment comes from the actual images and their shadow features. The thermophysical modeling uses a co-authored prior code (Hu & Shi 2021) as a general tool with fixed literature-based parameters (Table 2), and it is not calibrated to reproduce the observed migration. The sublimation flux and 'rocket force' estimates are model outputs, not fitted constants, and are presented as a speculative scenario (Scenario C); the computed acceleration is one order of magnitude below surface gravity, so it does not amount to a forced prediction. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness claim is imported from the authors' prior work. The only self-citations are instrumental and non-load-bearing for the main timing result. The low-resolution identification and unquantified registration errors are legitimate precision/robustness limitations, not circular reductions. Therefore the circularity score is 2, reflecting a minor non-load-bearing self-citation, with no circular step found.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The 14-hour timing claim rests on the public shape model and SPICE geometry, which are standard and testable. The self-propulsion mechanism adds material assumptions: ice fraction, dust density, ice-rich interior, and applicability of the Hu-Shi thermal model. These are stated but not independently validated for this boulder. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Initial ice volume fraction = 0.1
    Used in thermophysical model (Table 2) as an assumed cometary material property; not fitted to the migration event, but controls sublimation flux and thus the proposed self-propulsion estimate.
  • Dust volume-filling fraction = 0.2
    Assumed dust packing in the nucleus in the thermophysical model (Table 2); influences thermal conductivity and sublimation.
  • Compact dust density = 2000 kg m^-3
    Assumed density of refractory dust in Table 2; affects heat capacity and mass balance in the model.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption SHAP7 shape model accurately represents the boulder's location, size, and surrounding topography at both pre- and post-migration epochs.
    Used for synthetic image matching and slope calculations (Sec. 3 and Fig. 1); authors note uncertainty in shape model when identifying the boulder at its new location (Sec. 3.3).
  • domain assumption SPICE-derived spacecraft position and camera pointing are accurate enough for image-to-model registration at ~20 m per pixel resolution.
    Relied on for projecting the shape model and locating the boulder in images (Sec. 3).
  • domain assumption The thermophysical model of Hu & Shi 2021 with Table 2 parameters simulates subsurface temperature and ice sublimation relevant to the boulder.
    Used to compute temperatures and flux rates in Sec. 4; the model code from co-authored prior work is not independently verified here.
  • domain assumption Large boulders on 67P contain significant subsurface volatile ices, so sublimation from the boulder itself is possible.
    Assumed in Scenario C (Sec. 5.3), citing Pommerol et al. 2015 and Pajola et al. 2015; if false, the self-propulsion mechanism fails.
  • standard math Standard energy and mass conservation equations (Eq. 1-2) apply to the porous cometary surface.
    Basis of the thermophysical model (Sec. 4).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Boulder migration in the Khonsu region of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/H5DLTDWE

@misc{pith2026241117108,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Boulder migration in the Khonsu region of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/H5DLTDWE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17108}
}
read the original abstract

European Space Agency's Rosetta mission is the only space mission that performed long-term monitoring of comet at close distances. Its over two years' rendezvous with comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko revealed diverse evolutionary processes of the cometary nucleus. One of the most striking events is the migration of a 30-m boulder in the southern hemisphere region of Khonsu. Previous works found the boulder's 140-m displacement occurred during the three months from August to October 2015, and several triggering mechanisms were proposed, including outburst at the boulder site, seismic vibrations from nearby activities, or surface erosion of the slope beneath the boulder. In this work, we further analyze this impressive event by analysing imaging data from Rosetta's OSIRIS camera. We constrained the boulder's migration time to within 14 hours and derived a detailed timeline of the boulder migration event and local dust activities. High-resolution thermophysical modelling shows significant dichotomy in the thermal history of the boulder's southern and northern sides, which could have triggered or facilitated its migration via its own volatile activity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17108 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. High-resolution images and Shape model of the boulder and its surrounding areas. In images, the arrows point to the boulder at that time and the red cross marks the original position of boulder in the ‘after’ image, the dates are the image acquisition time. (a) Local shape model showing the boulder at both locations before and after the migration. Red area covers the localized shape model used for thermal analysis. … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Variations of sub-solar point latitude (degree), 67P’s heliocentric distance (AU), spacecraft-comet distance (km) and NAC image spatial resolution (m pixel−1 ) for the time period between September 2014 and August 2016. The grey-outlined box indicates the time span of data used in this study. The red-dashed boxes with time annotations, Time[1] and Time[2], represent the proposed migration time for the boulder in El-… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of NAC surface resolution with Rosetta at different distances to the nucleus. NAC captured two images in different time. The image in rich detail was taken after perihelion while another showing the spacecraft was traveling away from 67P. The axes are set in logarithm scale [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: OSIRIS observations of the boulder location in early-October of 2015. During this time period images capturing from far distances, we utilized the zoom-in views (second column) and synthetic views (right column) of the observations for comparison. Images with round lab…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: OSIRIS observations of the boulder and its surroundings. Yellow arrows highlight the cluster of small boulder, the shallow scarp, the cluster of outcrop, situated to the north, west and east of the boulder’s former location, respectively. Yellow circles mark the presen…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Activities related to the migrating boulder in Khonsu region in early and after 2015 October. The cometary activities parts in the images are substituted with the contrast-stretched counterparts for better visualization. (a) the essential and only image for clues of mi…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Timeline combining the boulder migration event and local dust activities with their spatial and temporal correlations. The events are marked on comet-spacecraft distance variation. The blue background displays the zoom-in of timestamps from September 20 to October 10, …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Insolation history of the boulder and its surrounding areas before its migration. (a) cumulative insolation between 2014-05-17 and 2015-10-03; The locations of representative facets S and N are indicated with red and blue crosses, respectively; (b) number of rotations …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Depth-dependent temperature variation at two facets on the southern and northern sides of the boulder during one rotation and one orbit of 67P. (a) Diurnal temperature variation at different depths of facet S from 2015-10-03T10:00:00; (b) the same as (a) for facet N; (…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Flux rate of water vapour during one rotation of the nucleus starting from 2015-10-03T10:00:00 at different depths of (a) facet S and (b) facet N whether such an outburst did occur within the 14 hour window of the migration event. Outbursts [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/f…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Effective surface slope in the areas surrounding the migrating boulder. The effective surface slope was defined as the angle between the negative surface normal direction and the vector of surface acceleration that consists of both gravitational and rotational acceler…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Original boulder position and mini-outburst projected onto the NAC image of 2016 June 11, UTC 05:11. Position of pre-migration boulder is represented in red dots created from vertices of its shape model, while the orange markers show the reprojection of night-time dus…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The sequence MTP021 STP076 OUTBURST 003, observations for the prolonged activity after migration event in October 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Mini-outburst on 2015 October 4, and its possible correlation with the boulder. (a) Actual observation taken at UTC 19:16 with long exposure time to reveal dust activity and possible outbursts on 67P. (b) Enlarged view of part of the image in the red frame in (a), sho…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: OSIRIS NAC image taken on 2016 September 20, showing a ∼60 m boulder in Hatmehit region. On top of this boulder, several smaller meter-scale boulders are observed, and two of which are indicated by arrows [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_15.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2016, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 41, 357

    Acton, C., Bachman, N., Semenov, B., & Wright, E. 2016, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 41, 357

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    F., Vincent , J

    Agarwal , J., A'Hearn , M. F., Vincent , J. B., et al. 2016, , 462, S78, 10.1093/mnras/stw2179

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2179 2016

  3. [3]

    D., et al

    Agarwal, J., Della Corte, V., Feldman, P. D., et al. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 469, s606

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    N., Birch, S

    Barrington, M. N., Birch, S. P. D., Jindal, A., et al. 2023, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 128, e2022JE007723, 10.1029/2022JE007723

    work page doi:10.1029/2022je007723 2023

  5. [5]

    2020, , 636, A91, 10.1051/0004-6361/202037485

    Cambianica , P., Fulle , M., Cremonese , G., et al. 2020, , 636, A91, 10.1051/0004-6361/202037485

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037485 2020

  6. [6]

    C., Capaccioni , F., Ciarniello , M., et al

    De Sanctis , M. C., Capaccioni , F., Ciarniello , M., et al. 2015, , 525, 500, 10.1038/nature14869

    work page doi:10.1038/nature14869 2015

  7. [7]

    R., Groussin, O., Thomas, N., et al

    El-Maarry, M. R., Groussin, O., Thomas, N., et al. 2017, Science, 355, 1392

    2017

  8. [8]

    2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 630, A7

    Fornasier, S., Hoang, V., Hasselmann, P., et al. 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 630, A7

    work page 2019

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    H., Hasselmann , P

    Fornasier , S., Hoang , V. H., Hasselmann , P. H., et al. 2019, , 630, A7, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833803

    2019 doi

  2. [10]

    2016, , 462, S220, 10.1093/mnras/stw2088

    Gr \"u n , E., Agarwal , J., Altobelli , N., et al. 2016, , 462, S220, 10.1093/mnras/stw2088

    2016 doi

  3. [11]

    C., Altwegg , K., Berthelier , J

    Hansen , K. C., Altwegg , K., Berthelier , J. J., et al. 2016, , 462, S491, 10.1093/mnras/stw2413

    2016 doi

  4. [12]

    H., Barucci, M

    Hasselmann, P. H., Barucci, M. A., Fornasier, S., et al. 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 630, A8

    2019

  5. [13]

    2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 910, 10, 10.3847/1538-4357/abddbf

    Hu, X., & Shi, X. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 910, 10, 10.3847/1538-4357/abddbf

    2021 doi

  6. [14]

    2017 a , Astronomy & Astrophysics, 604, A114, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629910

    Hu, X., Shi, X., Sierks, H., et al. 2017 a , Astronomy & Astrophysics, 604, A114, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629910

    2017 doi

  7. [15]

    2017 b , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 469, S295, 10.1093/mnras/stx1607

    ---. 2017 b , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 469, S295, 10.1093/mnras/stx1607

    2017 doi

  8. [16]

    U., Barbieri, C., Lamy, P., et al

    Keller, H. U., Barbieri, C., Lamy, P., et al. 2007, Space Science Reviews, 128, 433, 10.1007/s11214-006-9128-4

    2007 doi

  9. [17]

    U., Mottola, S., Hviid, S

    Keller, H. U., Mottola, S., Hviid, S. F., et al. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 469, S357

    2017

  10. [18]

    Y., Hviid, S

    Knollenberg, J., Lin, Z. Y., Hviid, S. F., et al. 2016, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 596, A89, 10.1051/0004-6361/201527744

    2016 doi

  11. [19]

    2019, , 331, 179, 10.1016/j.icarus.2019.05.019

    Michikami , T., Honda , C., Miyamoto , H., et al. 2019, , 331, 179, 10.1016/j.icarus.2019.05.019

    2019 doi

  12. [20]

    J., et al

    Miyamoto, H., Yano, H., Scheeres, D. J., et al. 2007, Science, 316, 1011, 10.1126/science.1134390

    2007 doi

  13. [21]

    R., Altwegg , K., Berthelier , J.-J., et al

    M \"u ller , D. R., Altwegg , K., Berthelier , J.-J., et al. 2024, , 529, 2763, 10.1093/mnras/stae622

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    2021, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 126, e06594, 10.1029/2020JE006594

    Nishiyama , G., Kawamura , T., Namiki , N., et al. 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 126, e06594, 10.1029/2020JE006594

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    M., Pajola, M., et al

    Oklay, N., Sunshine, J. M., Pajola, M., et al. 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 462, S394

    2016

  16. [24]

    2020, Nature, 586, 697, 10.1038/s41586-020-2834-3

    O’Rourke, L., Heinisch, P., Blum, J., et al. 2020, Nature, 586, 697, 10.1038/s41586-020-2834-3

    2020 doi

  17. [25]

    2015, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 583, A37

    Pajola, M., Vincent, J.-B., G \"u ttler, C., et al. 2015, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 583, A37

    2015

  18. [26]

    2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0092

    Pajola, M., H \"o fner, S., Vincent, J.-B., et al. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0092

    2017

  19. [27]

    2022, , 659, A171, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141953

    Pfeifer , M., Agarwal , J., & Schr \"o ter , M. 2022, , 659, A171, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141953

    2022 doi

  20. [28]

    R., et al

    Pommerol, A., Thomas, N., El-Maarry, M. R., et al. 2015, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 583, A25, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525977

    2015 doi

  21. [29]

    2017, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 607, L1, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731798

    Preusker, F., Scholten, F., Matz, K.-D., et al. 2017, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 607, L1, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731798

    2017 doi

  22. [30]

    E., Steckloff , J

    Richardson , J. E., Steckloff , J. K., & Minton , D. A. 2020, , 347, 113811, 10.1016/j.icarus.2020.113811

    2020

  23. [31]

    2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 526, 4209, 10.1093/mnras/stad3005

    Rubin, M., Altwegg, K., Berthelier, J.-J., et al. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 526, 4209, 10.1093/mnras/stad3005

    2023 doi

  24. [32]

    2016, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 586, A7

    Shi, X., Hu, X., Sierks, H., et al. 2016, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 586, A7

    2016

  25. [33]

    2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 562, 10.1038/s41550-018-0481-5

    Shi , X., Hu , X., Mottola , S., et al. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 562, 10.1038/s41550-018-0481-5

    2018 doi

  26. [34]

    2024, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 961, L16

    Shi, X., Hu, X., Agarwal, J., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 961, L16

    2024

  27. [35]

    L., et al

    Sierks , H., Barbieri , C., Lamy , P. L., et al. 2015, Science, 347, aaa1044, 10.1126/science.aaa1044

    2015 doi

  28. [36]

    V., Rezac , L., Hartogh , P., Bazilevsky , A

    Skorov , Y. V., Rezac , L., Hartogh , P., Bazilevsky , A. T., & Keller , H. U. 2016, , 593, A76, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628365

    2016 doi

  29. [37]

    2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 375, 20160262

    Taylor, M., Altobelli, N., Buratti, B., & Choukroun, M. 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 375, 20160262

    2017

  30. [38]

    R., et al

    Thomas , N., Davidsson , B., El-Maarry , M. R., et al. 2015, , 583, A17, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526049

    2015 doi

  31. [39]

    R., Theologou , P., et al

    Thomas , N., El Maarry , M. R., Theologou , P., et al. 2018, , 164, 19, 10.1016/j.pss.2018.05.019

    2018 doi

  32. [40]

    2015, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 583, A46, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525985

    Tubiana, C., Güttler, C., Kovacs, G., et al. 2015, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 583, A46, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525985

    2015 doi

  33. [41]

    2019, in EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2019, Vol

    Vincent , J.-B., Birch , S., Hayes , A., et al. 2019, in EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2019, Vol. 2019, EPSC--DPS2019--502

    2019

  34. [42]

    2015, Nature, 523, 63

    Vincent, J.-B., Bodewits, D., Besse, S., et al. 2015, Nature, 523, 63

    2015

  35. [43]

    2016 a , Astronomy & Astrophysics, 587, A14

    Vincent, J.-B., Oklay, N., Pajola, M., et al. 2016 a , Astronomy & Astrophysics, 587, A14

    2016

  36. [44]

    F., Lin, Z.-Y., et al

    Vincent, J.-B., A'Hearn, M. F., Lin, Z.-Y., et al. 2016 b , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 462, S184

    2016

  37. [45]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.stat...

  38. [46]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.d...

  39. [47]

    e O|r]g )[З C 1ɿ7l ثm9u

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' en...

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.