Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

AIGV-Assessor: Benchmarking and Evaluating the Perceptual Quality of Text-to-Video Generation with LMM

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.17221 v1 pith:4ONQT7H6 submitted 2024-11-26 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords aigvsqualitymodelsaigv-assessoraigvqa-dbperceptualvideoaccurately
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapid advancement of large multimodal models (LMMs) has led to the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence generated videos (AIGVs), which highlights the pressing need for effective video quality assessment (VQA) models designed specifically for AIGVs. Current VQA models generally fall short in accurately assessing the perceptual quality of AIGVs due to the presence of unique distortions, such as unrealistic objects, unnatural movements, or inconsistent visual elements. To address this challenge, we first present AIGVQA-DB, a large-scale dataset comprising 36,576 AIGVs generated by 15 advanced text-to-video models using 1,048 diverse prompts. With these AIGVs, a systematic annotation pipeline including scoring and ranking processes is devised, which collects 370k expert ratings to date. Based on AIGVQA-DB, we further introduce AIGV-Assessor, a novel VQA model that leverages spatiotemporal features and LMM frameworks to capture the intricate quality attributes of AIGVs, thereby accurately predicting precise video quality scores and video pair preferences. Through comprehensive experiments on both AIGVQA-DB and existing AIGV databases, AIGV-Assessor demonstrates state-of-the-art performance, significantly surpassing existing scoring or evaluation methods in terms of multiple perceptual quality dimensions.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Human Preference-Aligned Concept Customization Benchmark via Decomposed Evaluation

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    D-GPTScore, which averages GPT-4o's per-aspect ratings of concept-customized images, correlates with human preference at 0.78 Pearson on the new CC-AlignBench, beating prior metrics.

  2. Towards Holistic Visual Quality Assessment of AI-Generated Videos: A LLM-Based Multi-Dimensional Evaluation Model

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    AIGVEval combines BLIP, 3D Swin Transformer, and SlowFast features with a LoRA-tuned LLM to predict AI-generated video quality, hitting second place on the NTIRE 2025 Track 2 leaderboard.

Pith tools