[Locally Conformal Higher Order Lagrangian Dynamics

O\u{g}ul Esen; Serdar \c{C}\.ite

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 55 references

[Locally Conformal Higher Order Lagrangian Dynamics

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper derives the locally conformal n-th order Euler-Lagrange equations, writing the classical higher-order Euler-Lagrange operator equal to an explicit correction term built from the Lee one-form and partial Bell polynomials.

desk verdict Solid extension of first-order LCS Lagrangian dynamics to higher order, but the 'without loss of generality' position-only conformal factor is a real restriction the paper should own. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17300 v1 pith:B27MY3QJ submitted 2024-11-26 math-ph math.MP

Serdar Çi̇te , Oğul Esen This is my paper · ORCID

classification math-phmath.MP MSC 37J0653C1870H50

keywords locallyconformallysymplectichigherorderLagrangiandynamicsEuler-LagrangeequationspartialBellpolynomialsLeeone-formconformalfactorchiraloscillatorvariationalcalculus

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper extends locally conformal Lagrangian dynamics, previously known for first-order systems, to Lagrangians that depend on positions and their time derivatives up to arbitrary order n. The central result is an explicit n-th order Euler-Lagrange equation in which the standard variational operator equals a correction term A^n_i[L] built from the conformal data. The authors work out the second-order case in full, recover the known first-order case as a special limit, and illustrate the equations on a chiral oscillator. A sympathetic reader should care because this gives a compact, algorithmic way to write equations of motion on manifolds where local symplectic structure is ambiguous up to conformal rescaling.

What carries the argument

The central object is the correction tensor $A^n_i[L]$ on the right-hand side of the locally conformal Euler-Lagrange equations. The argument is carried by the identity $$\frac{d^q}{dt^q}\left($e^{{-\sigma_\alpha}}$\right) = $e^{{-\sigma_\alpha}}$ B_q,$$ where $B_q = \sum_{a=1}^q \Phi_a \, B_{q,a}(\dot x, \ddot x, \ldots, x^{(q)})$; here $\Phi_a$ are partition sums of products of derivatives of the conformal factor (for example $\Phi_1=-\sigma_i$ and $\Phi_2=\sigma_i\sigma_j-\sigma_{ij}$), and $B_{q,a}$ are partial exponential Bell polynomials in the time derivatives of $x$. Expanding each term $\frac{d^q}{dt^q}(e^{-\sigma_\alpha} \partial L/\partial x_i^{(q)})$ by the Leibniz rule, substituting this identity, and cancelling $e^{-\sigma_\alpha}$ converts the variational equations into the compact form of Proposition 8.1.

What would settle it

Take a second-order Lagrangian on $R^{2}$ with a rescaling factor that depends on velocity, for example $\sigma$ = $v_1^{2}$, compute the variation of the action directly, and compare with Proposition 5.1: any mismatch in the coefficient of the velocity derivative would show the position-only assumption is doing real work.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Proposition 8.1 states that for an n-th order Lagrangian L on the higher tangent bundle, the locally conformal Euler-Lagrange equations take the form $$\sum_{q=0}^n (-1)^q \frac{d^q}{dt^q}\frac{\partial L}{\partial $x_i^{{(q)}}$} = A^n_i[L],$$ where $$A^n_i[L] = \sigma_i L + \sum_{q=1}^n (-1)^{q+1}\sum_{e=0}^{q-1} \binom{q}{e} B_{q-e} \frac{d^e}{dt^e}\frac{\partial L}{\partial $x_i^{{(q)}}$}.$$ The coefficients $B_{q-e}$ are assembled from partial Bell polynomials and derivatives of the conformal factor. The paper proves this by varying a globally defined function $L = e^{\sigma_\alpha} L_\alpha$ on each chart, expanding the resulting time derivatives with a combinatorial Leibniz rule, and cancelling the exponential factor. The second-order case, Proposition 5.1, is the same formula specialized to $n=2$; when the Lagrangian has no acceleration dependence it reduces to the first-order locally conformal equations, and when the conformal factor is constant it reduces to the classical higher-order Euler-Lagrange equations.

Load-bearing premise

The whole derivation assumes the rescaling between local charts depends only on position coordinates, not on velocity or acceleration; if it could also depend on velocity, the correction terms computed here would miss pieces.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

When the conformal factor is constant, the correction term vanishes and the equations reduce to the standard higher-order Euler-Lagrange equations.
For a Lagrangian independent of acceleration, the second-order equations reduce to the first-order locally conformal equations, so the higher-order framework contains the earlier theory as a limit.
The formula is algorithmic: for any n, the equations can be written by expanding the Bell-polynomial terms without performing a separate variational calculation.
The second-order equations are applied to a locally conformal chiral oscillator on the punctured plane, where the closed but non-exact one-form $2d\varphi$ supplies the conformal factor.
The third-order case is written out explicitly in Example 8.3, so the general formula yields concrete equations for the next order beyond the second-order example.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The authors list Hamilton-Jacobi theory as future work; the explicit $A^n_i[L]$ formula makes a locally conformal higher-order Hamilton-Jacobi theory a direct computation rather than a separate derivation.
A testable extension would allow the conformal factor to depend on velocity or higher derivatives; the paper's position-only assumption would then require extra terms, and comparing the two versions would show exactly where the 'without loss of generality' step fails.
Because the Bell polynomials are universal and computable, the correction terms could be generated symbolically for arbitrary n, which would make numerical or perturbative studies of locally conformal higher-order systems straightforward.
The chiral oscillator example hints that these equations may be useful for planar systems with geometric or dissipative effects encoded in a closed one-form, but the paper does not develop that connection.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's my take. The paper does something real: it derives locally conformal Euler-Lagrange equations for second- and arbitrary-order Lagrangians on T^nQ. Proposition 8.1, with the Bell-polynomial right-hand side, is a genuine generalization of the first-order LCS equations, and Proposition 5.1 is the correct second-order special case. I checked the reductions: when L is independent of acceleration, (5.10) falls back to the first-order equation (3.3); Example 8.3 reproduces the third-order structure; Example 8.2 matches Proposition 5.1. The chiral oscillator application in Section 9 is a concrete, worked check, not decorative. The citation pattern is honest: the direct predecessors are the authors' own first-order papers [19,20], and they cite the standard higher-order Lagrangian and LCS literature. Self-citation here is not padding.

The soft spot is the one the stress test flagged. Near (2.17) and again in Section 3, the conformal factors are assumed to depend only on the base coordinates x, and the text calls this 'without loss of generalization.' It is not. If the Lee one-form had components along ẋ, ẍ, etc., the chain-rule expansion (7.2) for d^m/dt^m(e^{-σ}) would acquire extra terms, and the compact right-hand side A^n_i[L] in (8.6) would be incomplete. So Proposition 8.1 is a theorem about semi-basic Lee forms pulled back from Q, not about general LCS structures on T^nQ. The equations themselves are consistent under that hypothesis; the flaw is the unqualified generality claim, not the derivation. The fix is easy: either drop 'without loss' and state the semi-basic assumption honestly, or prove a Darboux-type result showing the general case reduces to it (which I doubt is true).

There are also minor editorial issues: the paper is dense, some notation is heavy, and there are typos in the examples, but nothing that affects the substance.

Who is this for? Geometric mechanicians working on LCS dynamics and higher-order Lagrangian theory. It's a subfield contribution, not a breakthrough, but it fills a real gap. I would send it to peer review. A serious referee should focus on the semi-basic restriction and ask the authors to scope the claims accurately. With that change, the paper is a solid, usable reference.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops locally conformal Euler-Lagrange equations for higher-order Lagrangians on the n-th order tangent bundle T^nQ. After reviewing locally conformally symplectic (LCS) geometry and the first-order locally conformal Lagrangian equations, it derives the second-order case as Proposition 5.1, introduces combinatorial notation based on partial Bell polynomials and partition sums in Section 7, and states the general n-th order formula as Proposition 8.1. It verifies that the n=1 and n=2 cases reproduce earlier first-order and newly derived second-order results, and it closes with an application to a locally conformal chiral oscillator in Section 9.

Significance. Within the class of conformal factors that depend only on the base coordinates, the paper gives a compact, apparently correct combinatorial formula for the locally conformal higher-order Euler-Lagrange equations. The derivation is explicit and the reductions in Examples 8.1 through 8.3 provide useful cross-checks, as does the chiral oscillator example. The main limitation is that the 'without loss of generality' statement about position-only conformal factors is not valid in the higher-order tangent setting, so the announced scope is broader than what is actually proved. The paper is a solid extension of the authors' earlier first-order LCS Lagrangian work, provided that scope is corrected.

major comments (1)

[Sections 2, 3, 6-8; Eq. (2.17), Eq. (7.2), Prop. 8.1] The statement near Eq. (2.17) and repeated in Section 3 that taking conformal factors σ_α depending only on the base coordinates x is 'without loss of generalization' is not justified in the higher-order setting. The expansion (7.2) for d^m/dt^m(e^{-σ_α}) uses only partial derivatives of σ_α with respect to x and time derivatives of x. If the Lee one-form has components along ẋ, ẍ, ..., then additional terms involving ∂σ_α/∂ẋ, ∂σ_α/∂ẍ, and their time derivatives appear, and the right-hand side A^n_i[L] in Eq. (8.6) would be incomplete. Proposition 8.1, and its second-order special case Proposition 5.1, are therefore established only for conformal factors pulled back from the base manifold, i.e., for semi-basic Lee forms. The cited discussion in [20] concerns the first-order theory and does not settle the higher-order case. The authors should either prove that a general locally conformal structure on T^nQ can be brought to this semi-basic form, or explicitly restrict the theorem and adjust the title and abstract claims accordingly.

minor comments (5)

[Sections 5 and 6, Eqs. (5.7) and (6.7)] The text says that the global Lagrangian L is substituted into the action, but the displayed integrand is e^{-σ_α}L, which equals the local Lagrangian L_α. Please clarify whether the variational principle is local (variation of ∫ L_α dt) or global, and adjust the wording accordingly.
[Section 7, Eqs. (7.3) and (8.3)] The quantity B_0 is used implicitly in the double sum (8.3) when q=e, but it is not defined in (7.3). Please define B_0 = 1 so that the substitution is unambiguous.
[Section 9, after Eq. (9.4)] The sentence 'Then we plug this local Lagrangian into Equation (5.4)' should refer to Eq. (5.9) or (5.10), since Eq. (5.4) is the standard second-order Euler-Lagrange equation without conformal terms.
[Section 8, Example 8.3] There are typographical errors, including 'Propositon' before Example 8.1 and 'amd' instead of 'and' in Example 8.3; these should be corrected.
[Section 7, Eq. (7.8)] In the denominator of the last term in the displayed computation of Φ_3, the index i_2 appears twice; the third derivative should be with respect to x^{i_3}.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the n-th order equations are obtained by direct variational expansion; the only caveat is the position-only conformal factor, a stated restriction rather than a fitted input.

full rationale

The paper's central claim (Proposition 8.1) is obtained by a direct variational computation, not by fitting or by importing a target. Starting from the local action ∫ e^{-σ_α} L dt, the variation (6.8) and the identity (6.9) are derived by integration by parts. The combinatorial Section 7 computes d^m/dt^m(e^{-σ_α}) = e^{-σ_α} B_m using the chain rule and partial Bell polynomials (7.2)-(7.9). Substitution into (8.2)-(8.3) and cancellation of e^{-σ_α} yields (8.4), which is exactly Proposition 8.1. The right-hand side A^n_i[L] is the collected residual after Leibniz expansion, not an independently posited expression, so there is no self-definitional or fitted-input circularity. The n=2 case (Proposition 5.1) is derived independently in Section 5 and agrees with (8.10); the n=1 case (8.8) reproduces Proposition 3.1. Citations [19,20] (same group) are used for the first-order equation and for the position-only conformal-factor choice, but the n-th order derivation does not rely on those citations as premises. The one caveat is the phrase 'without loss of generalization' near (2.17) and repeated in Section 3: the conformal factor is assumed to depend only on x, and the expansion (7.2) uses only ∂σ/∂x. If σ depended on velocities or higher derivatives, additional terms would appear and the simplified A^n_i[L] would not follow. This is an overstatement of scope, not a circular reduction: under the stated hypothesis the derivation is self-contained. No equation in the paper reduces to another equation by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Hence no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation relies on standard LCS geometry and the variational principle. No free parameters are fitted. The only domain assumption is the position-dependence of conformal factors, inherited from the cotangent-bundle LCS construction. No new entities are introduced.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption Conformal factors depend only on base coordinates: sigma_alpha = sigma_alpha(x).
Stated as 'without loss of generalization' near Eq. (2.17) and repeated in Section 3. It holds for cotangent-bundle LCS structures with a semi-basic Lee form, but it is an assumption for general higher-order tangent bundles.
standard math Standard calculus of variations with fixed endpoints and arbitrary variations delta x^i.
Used to obtain Euler-Lagrange equations from the action integral in Section 5, Eqs. (5.7) through (5.9), and in the general-order derivation in Section 6.
standard math LCS manifold definition, gluing conditions, and the local-to-global construction of the global Lagrangian L.
Background from LCS geometry, summarized in Section 2 and used in Sections 3, 5, and 6. These are standard definitions and results from the cited literature.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of [Locally Conformal Higher Order Lagrangian Dynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B27MY3QJ

@misc{pith2026241117300,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: [Locally Conformal Higher Order Lagrangian Dynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/B27MY3QJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17300}
}

read the original abstract

This work presents higher order Lagrangian dynamics possessing locally conformal character. More concretely, locally conformal higher order Euler-Lagrange equations are written with particular focus on the second- and the third-order cases.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

[20]

Abraham and J

R. Abraham and J. E. Marsden. Foundations of mechanics . Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., Inc., Ad- vanced Book Program, Reading, Mass., 1978. 20 SERDAR C ¸ ˙ ITE AND O ˘GUL ESEN

work page 1978
[1]

However, the inverse of this assertion does not generally hold; having local Hami ltonian dynamics in each chart does not guarantee the existence of global Hamiltonian dynamics

I/n.pc/t.pc/r.pc/o.pc/d.pc/u.pc/c.pc/t.pc/i.pc/o.pc/n.pc The existence of global Hamiltonian dynamics deﬁned on a who le (symplectic or Poisson) manifold reads local Hamiltonian dynamics in each local cha rt, [1, 2, 26]. However, the inverse of this assertion does not generally hold; having local Hami ltonian dynamics in each chart does not guarantee the ...

work page 2020
[2]

Locally Conformally Symplectic Geometry 2

work page
[3]

Locally Conformal Lagrangian Dynamics 6

work page
[4]

Higher Order Lagrangian Dynamics 7

work page
[5]

Locally Conformal Second Order Lagrangian Dynamics 8

work page
[6]

Locally Conformal Higher Order Lagrangian Functions 10

work page
[7]

Some Combinatorial Notations and Bell’s Polynomials 12

work page

Show all 55 references

[8]

Locally Conformal Higher Order Euler-Lagrange Equation s 16
[9]

A Locally Conformal Chiral Oscillator 18
[10]

Conclusion and Future Work 19 References 19
[11]

We begin with the one involving the Lichnerowicz-deRham (LdR) diﬀerential then we shall elaborate what we call the local-to-global approach

L/o.pc/c.pc/a.pc/l.pc/l.pc/y.pc C/o.pc/n.pc/f.pc/o.pc/r.pc/m.pc/a.pc/l.pc/l.pc/y.pc S/y.pc/m.pc/p.pc/l.pc/e.pc/c.pc/t.pc/i.pc/c.pc G/e.pc/o.pc/m.pc/e.pc/t.pc/r.pc/y.pc There are alternative ways to deﬁne locally conformally sym plectic (LCS) manifolds. We begin with the one in...
[12]

L/o.pc/c.pc/a.pc/l.pc/l.pc/y.pc C/o.pc/n.pc/f.pc/o.pc/r.pc/m.pc/a.pc/l.pc L/a.pc/g.pc/r.pc/a.pc/n.pc/g.pc/i.pc/a.pc/n.pc D/y.pc/n.pc/a.pc/m.pc/i.pc/c.pc/s.pc Consider the tangent bundle/u1D447/u1D444covered by local charts/u1D447/u1D449/u1D6FC(as deﬁned in ( 2.14)), each equip...
[13]

The variation of the action integral yields the Euler-Lagrange equations ( 3.6)

H/i.pc/g.pc/h.pc/e.pc/r.pc O/r.pc/d.pc/e.pc/r.pc L/a.pc/g.pc/r.pc/a.pc/n.pc/g.pc/i.pc/a.pc/n.pc D/y.pc/n.pc/a.pc/m.pc/i.pc/c.pc/s.pc In the classical picture (3.6), the Lagrangian function is deﬁned on the tangent bundle /u1D447/u1D444hence it depends on position and velocity,...
[14]

Consider the local charts {/u1D449/u1D6FC}, as given in ( 2.13), for /u1D444

L/o.pc/c.pc/a.pc/l.pc/l.pc/y.pc C/o.pc/n.pc/f.pc/o.pc/r.pc/m.pc/a.pc/l.pc S/e.pc/c.pc/o.pc/n.pc/d.pc O/r.pc/d.pc/e.pc/r.pc L/a.pc/g.pc/r.pc/a.pc/n.pc/g.pc/i.pc/a.pc/n.pc D/y.pc/n.pc/a.pc/m.pc/i.pc/c.pc/s.pc We begin with the locally conformal analysis of the second or der Lagr...
[15]

L/o.pc/c.pc/a.pc/l.pc/l.pc/y.pc C/o.pc/n.pc/f.pc/o.pc/r.pc/m.pc/a.pc/l.pc H/i.pc/g.pc/h.pc/e.pc/r.pc O/r.pc/d.pc/e.pc/r.pc L/a.pc/g.pc/r.pc/a.pc/n.pc/g.pc/i.pc/a.pc/n.pc F/u.pc/n.pc/c.pc/t.pc/i.pc/o.pc/n.pc/s.pc In this and the following two sections, we generalize the loc all...
[16]

This leads us to get rid of the exponential functions and permits us to write the dynamical equations in a more comp act form

S/o.pc/m.pc/e.pc C/o.pc/m.pc/b.pc/i.pc/n.pc/a.pc/t.pc/o.pc/r.pc/i.pc/a.pc/l.pc N/o.pc/t.pc/a.pc/t.pc/i.pc/o.pc/n.pc/s.pc /a.pc/n.pc/d.pc B/e.pc/l.pc/l.pc ’/s.pc P/o.pc/l.pc/y.pc/n.pc/o.pc/m.pc/i.pc/a.pc/l.pc/s.pc This section examines the terms in ( 6.9). This leads us to get ...
[17]

This gives our ma in result, locally conformal higher order Lagrangian dynamics

L/o.pc/c.pc/a.pc/l.pc/l.pc/y.pc C/o.pc/n.pc/f.pc/o.pc/r.pc/m.pc/a.pc/l.pc H/i.pc/g.pc/h.pc/e.pc/r.pc O/r.pc/d.pc/e.pc/r.pc E/u.pc/l.pc/e.pc/r.pc-L/a.pc/g.pc/r.pc/a.pc/n.pc/g.pc/e.pc E/q.pc/u.pc/a.pc/t.pc/i.pc/o.pc/n.pc/s.pc In this section, we start with the dynamical equation...
[18]

After a cut in /u1D444, we determine polar coordinates /u1D465= /u1D45Fcos /u1D719, /u1D466= /u1D45Fsin /u1D719

A L/o.pc/c.pc/a.pc/l.pc/l.pc/y.pc C/o.pc/n.pc/f.pc/o.pc/r.pc/m.pc/a.pc/l.pc C/h.pc/i.pc/r.pc/a.pc/l.pc O/s.pc/c.pc/i.pc/l.pc/l.pc/a.pc/t.pc/o.pc/r.pc As the base manifold, consider two dimensional punctured Euclidean space /u1D444= R2 − {0} where 0 stands for the origin, then ...
[19]

C/o.pc/n.pc/c.pc/l.pc/u.pc/s.pc/i.pc/o.pc/n.pc /a.pc/n.pc/d.pc F/u.pc/t.pc/u.pc/r.pc/e.pc W/o.pc/r.pc/k.pc In this work, we have explored the locally conformal analysi s of higher order Lagrangian dynamics. Following a brief review of the fundamental struc tures of locally con...
[21]

V . I. Arnold. Mathematical methods of classical mechanics , volume 60 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics . Springer-Verlag, New Y ork, second edition, 1989. Translat ed from the Russian by K. Vogtmann and A. Weinstein

1989
[22]

Ates ¸li, O

B. Ates ¸li, O. Esen, M. de Le ´on, and C. Sard ´on. On locally conformally cosymplectic Hamiltonian dynam ics and Hamilton-Jacobi theory. J. Phys. A, 56(1):Paper No. 015204, 40, 2023

2023
[23]

A. Banyaga. Some properties of locally conformal symple ctic structures. Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici, 77:383–398, 01 2002

2002
[24]

G. Bazzoni. Locally conformally symplectic and K ¨ahler geometry. EMS Surv. Math. Sci. , 5(1-2):129–154, 2018

2018
[25]

E. T. Bell. Exponential polynomials. Ann. of Math. (2) , 35(2):258–277, 1934

1934
[26]

Benito, M

R. Benito, M. de Le ´on, and D. Mart ´ın de Diego. Higher-order discrete Lagrangian mechanics. Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys., 3(3):421–436, 2006

2006
[27]

A. I. Bobenko and Y . B. Suris. Discrete Lagrangian reduct ion, discrete Euler-Poincar´e equations, and semidi- rect products. Lett. Math. Phys., 49(1):79–93, 1999

1999
[28]

C ¸ a˘gatay Uc ¸gun

F. C ¸ a˘gatay Uc ¸gun. Total reduction of Chiral oscillator and its Dirac analysis. In AIP Conference Proceedings, volume 2183, 090005. AIP Publishing, 2019

2019
[29]

Chantraine and E

B. Chantraine and E. Murphy. Conformal symplectic geom etry of cotangent bundles. J. Symplectic Geom. , 17(3):639–661, 2019

2019
[30]

L. Comtet. Advanced Combinatorics: The Art of Finite and Inﬁnite Expansions. D Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, 1974

1974
[31]

Courant and D

R. Courant and D. Hilbert. Methods of mathematical physics. Vol. I . Interscience Publishers, Inc., New Y ork, 1953

1953
[32]

Crampin, W

M. Crampin, W . Sarlet, and F. Cantrijn. Higher-order di ﬀerential equations and higher-order Lagrangian mechanics. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. , 99(3):565–587, 1986

1986
[33]

de Le ´on, M

M. de Le ´on, M. Lainz, and A. Mu ˜niz Brea. The Hamilton–Jacobi theory for contact Hamiltoni an systems. Mathematics, 9(16):1993, 2021

1993
[34]

O. Esen, M. de Le ´on, and C. Sard ´on. A Hamilton-Jacobi formalism for higher order implicit L agrangians. J. Phys. A, 53(7):075204, 46, 2020

2020
[35]

O. Esen, M. de Le ´on, C. Sard ´on, and M. Zajac. Cauchy data space and multisymplectic form ulation of conformal classical ﬁeld theories. Ann. Physics, 434:Paper No. 168616, 26, 2021

2021
[36]

O. Esen, M. de Le ´on, C. Sard ´on, and M. Zajac. The globalization problem of the Hamilton- Dedonder-Weyl equations on a local /u1D458-symplectic framework. Mediterr. J. Math., 18(1):Paper No. 26, 25, 2021

2021
[37]

O. Esen, M. de Le ´on, C. Sard ´on, and M. Zajac. Hamilton-Jacobi formalism on locally conformally symplectic manifolds. J. Math. Phys., 62(3):Paper No. 033506, 15, 2021. LOCALLY CONFORMAL HIGHER ORDER LAGRANGIAN DYNAMICS 21

2021
[38]

O. Esen, A. Gezici, and H. G¨ umral. Discrete dynamics on locally conformal framework. Proc. Inst. Math. Mech. Natl. Acad. Sci. Azerb. , 50(1):133–151, 2024

2024
[39]

O. Esen, A. Gezici, and H. G¨ umral. Variational aspect a nd kinetic theory of locally conformal dynamics. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical , 57(36):365201, 2024

2024
[40]

O. Esen, C. Sard ´on, and M. Zajac. A discrete Hamilton–Jacobi theory for cont act Hamiltonian dynamics. Mathematics, 12(15), 2024

2024
[41]

Esen and S

O. Esen and S. S¨ utl¨ u. Discrete dynamical systems over double cross-product Lie groupoids. Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys., 18(4):Paper No. 2150057, 40, 2021

2021
[42]

M. Hardy. Combinatorics of partial derivatives. Electronic Journal of Combinatorics , 13(1), 2006

2006
[43]

H.-C. Lee. A kind of even-dimensional diﬀerential geom etry and its application to exterior calculus. Amer. J. Math., 65:433–438, 1943

1943
[44]

Libermann

P . Libermann. Sur les structures presque complexes et a utres structures inﬁnit ´esimales r ´eguli`eres. Bull. Soc. Math. France, 83:195–224, 1955

1955
[45]

Libermann and C

P . Libermann and C. M. Marle. Symplectic geometry and analytical mechanics , volume 35. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

2012
[46]

Lichnerowicz

A. Lichnerowicz. Les vari ´et´es de Jacobi et leurs alg`ebres de Lie associ´ees. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 57(4):453– 488, 1978

1978
[47]

Lukierski, P

J. Lukierski, P . C. Stichel, and W . J. Zakrzewski. Galil ean-invariant (2 + 1)-dimensional models with a Chern-Simons-like term and /u1D437= 2 noncommutative geometry. Ann. Physics, 260(2):224–249, 1997

1997
[48]

J. C. Marrero, D. Mart ´ın de Diego, and E. Mart ´ınez. Discrete Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics on Lie groupoids. Nonlinearity, 19(6):1313–1348, 2006

2006
[49]

J. E. Marsden, S. Pekarsky, and S. Shkoller. Discrete Eu ler-Poincar´e and Lie-Poisson equations. Nonlinearity, 12(6):1647–1662, 1999

1999
[50]

J. E. Marsden and T. S. Ratiu. Introduction to mechanics and symmetry , volume 17 of Texts in Applied Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New Y ork, second edition, 1999. A basic e xposition of classical mechanical systems

1999
[51]

J. E. Marsden and M. West. Discrete mechanics and variat ional integrators. Acta Numer., 10:357–514, 2001

2001
[52]

Otiman and M

A. Otiman and M. Stanciu. Darboux–Weinstein theorem fo r locally conformally symplectic manifolds.Journal of Geometry and Physics , 111:1–5, 2017

2017
[53]

M. Stanciu. Locally conformally symplectic reduction . Ann. Global Anal. Geom. , 56(2):245–275, 2019

2019
[54]

I. Vaisman. Locally conformal symplectic manifolds. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, 8:521–536, 1985

1985
[55]

M. P . Wojtkowski and C. Liverani. Conformally symplectic dynamics and symmetry of the Lyapunov spectrum. Comm. Math. Phys., 194(1):47–60, 1998. 22 SERDAR C ¸ ˙ ITE AND O ˘GUL ESEN D/e.pc/p.pc/a.pc/r.pc/t.pc/m.pc/e.pc/n.pc/t.pc /o.pc/f.pc P/h.pc/y.pc/s.pc/i.pc/c.pc/s.pc, B/o.p...

1998

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [20]

Abraham and J

R. Abraham and J. E. Marsden. Foundations of mechanics . Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., Inc., Ad- vanced Book Program, Reading, Mass., 1978. 20 SERDAR C ¸ ˙ ITE AND O ˘GUL ESEN

work page 1978

[2] [1]

However, the inverse of this assertion does not generally hold; having local Hami ltonian dynamics in each chart does not guarantee the existence of global Hamiltonian dynamics

I/n.pc/t.pc/r.pc/o.pc/d.pc/u.pc/c.pc/t.pc/i.pc/o.pc/n.pc The existence of global Hamiltonian dynamics deﬁned on a who le (symplectic or Poisson) manifold reads local Hamiltonian dynamics in each local cha rt, [1, 2, 26]. However, the inverse of this assertion does not generally hold; having local Hami ltonian dynamics in each chart does not guarantee the ...

work page 2020

[3] [2]

Locally Conformally Symplectic Geometry 2

work page

[4] [3]

Locally Conformal Lagrangian Dynamics 6

work page

[5] [4]

Higher Order Lagrangian Dynamics 7

work page

[6] [5]

Locally Conformal Second Order Lagrangian Dynamics 8

work page

[7] [6]

Locally Conformal Higher Order Lagrangian Functions 10

work page

[8] [7]

Some Combinatorial Notations and Bell’s Polynomials 12

work page