Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

A link between rocky exoplanet composition and stellar age

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Denser, more iron-rich rocky planets are found around younger stars.

desk verdict Plausible new age-composition correlation, but the unquantified RV selection function is the gap that needs closing before this is solid. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17358 v2 pith:KTBXITUK submitted 2024-11-26 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR

Angharad Weeks , Vincent Van Eylen , Daniel Huber , Daisuke Kawata , Amalie Stokholm , Victor Aguirre B{o}rsen-Koch , Paola Pinilla , Jakob Lysgaard R{o}rsted
show 2 more authors
Mark Lykke Winther Travis Berger
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.SR
keywords rockyexoplanetsexoplanetcompositionstellaragegalacticchemicalevolutionironmassfractionradiusvalleyhomogeneouscharacterisationmass-radiusrelation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the interior composition of rocky exoplanets is tied to the age of their host stars. After homogenising stellar parameters for a sample of 26 small planets below the radius valley, it finds that denser planets with higher inferred iron content orbit younger stars, while older stars host less dense, less iron-rich rocky planets. Quantitatively, the iron mass fraction and stellar age show a Pearson correlation of $-0.62$ and a Bayesian regression slope of about $-8$ percent iron per gigayear. The authors interpret the trend as a fingerprint of galactic chemical evolution: the material available for planet formation has grown more iron-rich over time, so planets forming today may differ from those that formed billions of years ago, including Earth.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a homogeneous re-characterisation of host stars: a grid-based Bayesian stellar modelling code takes space-based astrometry, photometry, and spectroscopy as inputs and returns stellar masses, radii, and ages with relative precision of roughly 2 Gyr. Planet radii and masses are recomputed from transit depths and radial-velocity semi-amplitudes using these stellar values, and only planets below the radius valley, the observed gap near 1.8 Earth radii that separates rocky super-Earths from sub-Neptunes, are kept. Each planet's iron mass fraction is obtained by linearly interpolating its mass-radius position on a grid of rocky interior models. The statistical quantity that carries the discovery is the negative correlation between inferred iron fraction and age, with a Pearson coefficient of $-0.62$ and a Bayesian regression slope of $\alpha=-8.0^{+4.6}_{-5.0}$ percent iron per gigayear.

What would settle it

An injection-recovery test that adds synthetic low-density planets to the radial-velocity data of young, active stars and measures how detection completeness varies with stellar age would settle the matter: if completeness declines steeply toward younger ages and the trend disappears after correction, the central claim is an artifact. A larger sample with asteroseismic ages that shows a flat density–age relation would also refute it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that rocky planet composition correlates with host-star age: planets that are denser and inferred to be richer in iron orbit younger stars. The paper reports correlation coefficients of $-0.62$ (Pearson) and $-0.63$ (Spearman), and a Bayesian linear-regression slope of $\alpha=-8.0^{+4.6}_{-5.0}$ percent iron per gigayear, with the trend confirmed by an orthogonal distance regression. It interprets this as the first observational link between rocky exoplanet composition and stellar age, driven by galactic chemical evolution: younger stars are more iron-rich and less $\alpha$-enhanced, and the material from which their planets formed follows the same enrichment. The paper argues the trend is not simply an effect of stellar mass or metallicity, because the correlation with age is stronger and the age-metallicity relation is flat until about 10 Gyr.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the observed density–age trend is not created by an age-dependent selection effect in the radial-velocity mass measurements; the paper acknowledges that younger, more active stars may be less sensitive to low-density planets, but provides no completeness model to rule this out.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Rocky exoplanet composition becomes a clock: denser, more iron-rich planets form in more recent epochs of galactic chemical evolution.
  • Planets forming today in the solar neighbourhood may have larger iron cores, higher surface gravity, and different internal heat and magnetic-dynamo behaviour than Earth, which formed several gigayears ago.
  • Old stars, above about 8 Gyr, may be unable to produce rocky planets with more than roughly 50 percent iron, narrowing the range of possible compositions around ancient systems.
  • The absence of a strong planet-composition–metallicity correlation is consistent with the trend being driven by alpha-element abundances and age rather than by [Fe/H] alone.
  • Future samples with precise asteroseismic ages, such as those expected from PLATO, should recover the same age–density relation and refine its slope.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the trend survives a completeness correction, the average density of rocky planets in a survey volume could be used as an independent probe of the local star-formation and chemical-enrichment history.
  • A direct test of the interpretation would be to compare the compositions of debris accreted onto old and young white dwarfs: the cooling age of the white dwarf should correlate with the iron content of the accreted rocky material.
  • Extending the analysis to M dwarfs and pre-main-sequence stars with gyrochronological ages would show whether the relation continues below about 2 Gyr or flattens.
  • The paper itself notes a possible selection effect: young, active stars may hide low-density planets in radial-velocity mass measurements, and an injection-recovery study quantifying that completeness is the most direct way to separate the physical trend from an observational one.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a homogeneous re-analysis of 26 transiting rocky exoplanets (R_p < 4 R_Earth, below the radius valley) and their host stars, using Gaia DR3 GSP-Spec parameters, parallaxes, and photometry as inputs to the BASTA stellar-modelling code. It recalculates planet radii and masses from the updated stellar parameters, infers iron mass fractions from the Zeng et al. (2019) interior grid, and reports a statistically significant negative correlation between inferred planet iron fraction and stellar age (Pearson r = -0.62, Spearman rho = -0.63, Bayesian linear-regression slope alpha = -8.0^{+4.6}_{-5.0} percent Fe per Gyr). The authors interpret the trend as evidence that rocky planets formed around younger, more iron-rich stars are denser and more iron-rich, linking exoplanet composition to Galactic chemical evolution.

Significance. If the trend is real, it is an important new demographic result: it would be the first homogeneous, sample-level evidence that rocky exoplanet composition depends on host-star age, connecting exoplanet interiors to Galactic chemical evolution and with consequences for the interpretation of planet formation and habitability. The paper's strengths are the careful homogenisation of stellar parameters, the multi-method age validation in Appendix A2 (asteroseismology, gyrochronology, kinematics, and chemical abundances), the use of established external interior and radius-valley models, and the explicit discussion of observational biases. The correlation is measured rather than derived, so circularity is not a concern. However, the sample is small (26 planets), the selection-function caveat in Section 4.4.2 is not quantified, and the statistical evidence is not reported in full; the result is therefore promising but not yet established at the strength the paper claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.4.2, Fig. 12] The central claim requires the sample to be representative in planet density across stellar age, but the acknowledged 'decreasing sensitivity to lower density planets towards younger ages' is not quantified. The mass-versus-age panel in Fig. 12 is not a sufficient null test: because the radial-velocity semi-amplitude scales as K ∝ M_p^(2/3) P^(-1/3) M_*^(-2/3) (Eq. 7), a selection in detectable K at fixed transit radius translates into a selection in density, not in mass alone. The authors should provide an RV completeness model (e.g., injection-recovery into the actual K uncertainties and activity levels) or a forward model that injects the proposed age-density relation and demonstrates that the observed r = -0.62 is recovered. Without this, the trend could be produced entirely by removing low-%Fe planets from the young-age end of the sample.
  2. [Section 4.1, Fig. 5] The assignment of %Fe = 0 to every planet whose best-fit mass and radius fall above the pure-rock track is a censoring step whose effect on the regression is not reported. The authors should state how many of the 26 planets receive this boundary value, show the distribution of the pre-truncation interpolated values, and rerun the linmix and ODR fits treating those measurements as upper limits (e.g., with a censored regression or a model that allows negative inferred Fe). This is needed to demonstrate that the slope and correlation are not artifacts of piling points up at the %Fe = 0 boundary.
  3. [Section 4.2] The statement that the correlation is 'highly significant' is not backed by a reported p-value or a permutation/bootstrap test. With N = 26 and typical age uncertainties of several Gyr, the linmix posterior alone is not a substitute for a robustness analysis. The authors should report p-values for the Pearson and Spearman coefficients, perform leave-one-out or bootstrap resampling, and show that the slope is not driven by the cluster of high-%Fe points at young ages in the upper-left of Fig. 5.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.1] The text near Fig. 3 says 'we plot the stellar density as a function of age'; this should read 'planet density'.
  2. [Section 2.3, Eq. (4)] The weighting term x_Θ in the marginalized posterior is not defined; a brief definition would make the Bayesian computation reproducible.
  3. [Section 5 and Abstract] The causal interpretation in terms of Galactic chemical evolution is plausible but is not directly tested (e.g., no Mg/Si or alpha-abundance measurements are used for the planet hosts); consider softening the causal language in the abstract and conclusions.
  4. [Data availability] The paper states that all data are in Tables 1-3, but it does not provide the posterior draws for the inferred %Fe values or the BASTA age posteriors; making these available as machine-readable files would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the age-composition trend is a measured correlation with independently determined variables.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an observed correlation between host-star age and inferred rocky planet iron fraction, not a derived quantity that reduces to its inputs. The two sides of the correlation are produced by independent chains: stellar ages come from BASTA fits to Gaia parallax, photometry, Teff, and [M/H] against stellar evolution models, while planet %Fe is interpolated from mass and radius using the Zeng et al. (2019) interior grid. Neither chain uses the other variable: the BASTA ages never use planet density or composition, and the %Fe interpolation never uses age. The correlation coefficients and linear regressions are descriptive statistics, not predictions from a fitted model, so there is no fitted-input-called-prediction step. The radius valley selection uses the prior empirical relation from Ho & Van Eylen (2023); while a co-author of the present paper is also an author of that relation, the relation is an external, published result that does not encode a density-age trend, and it is not fitted to this sample. The BASTA code is similarly a prior, publicly available tool, and the paper validates its ages against asteroseismology, gyrochronology, kinematics, and detailed abundances, including an independent Kepler LEGACY sample. The main weakness acknowledged in Section 4.4.2, namely a possible decreasing sensitivity to lower-density planets toward younger ages, is a selection-effect concern about whether the measured correlation is physically real; it is not a circularity because the paper does not claim to have corrected for it and the correlation is not constructed from that assumption. Overall, the derivation is self-contained as a measurement, and none of the load-bearing steps are equivalent to the paper's own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim introduces no new free parameters; the fitted regression slope and intercept describe the trend rather than constrain it. The analysis does rely on standard astrophysical modeling assumptions for stellar ages, interior composition, and sample selection, all external to this paper and validated to varying degrees.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Garstec stellar evolution models and BASTA inference produce accurate relative stellar ages for solar-type stars from Gaia DR3 input parameters.
    Section 2.3 and Appendix A2: the age axis of the main correlation relies entirely on this inference, validated against asteroseismology, gyrochronology, and chemical abundances with roughly 2 Gyr scatter.
  • domain assumption The Zeng et al. (2019) interior model grid, linearly interpolated in mass-radius space, maps measured planet mass and radius to iron mass fraction.
    Section 4.1: the y-axis of the main correlation is %Fe derived from this grid, with planets above the pure-rock track assigned 0% Fe.
  • domain assumption The radius valley location of Ho and Van Eylen (2023) correctly separates rocky super-Earths from volatile-rich sub-Neptunes.
    Section 3: sample selection keeps only planets below this period- and mass-dependent valley, so the inferred compositions assume negligible H-He envelopes.
  • domain assumption Planet age equals host star age because protoplanetary disks dissipate within a few million years.
    Section 4: this assumption assigns the measured stellar ages to the planets and is stated with references to Haisch et al. (2001) and Hartmann et al. (1998).
  • domain assumption Galactic chemical evolution produces a relation between stellar age and element abundances such that younger stars are more iron-rich and less alpha-enhanced.
    Section 5: this is the proposed physical mechanism for the observed trend, supported by prior work and by the qualitative F_star_iron versus age relation in Appendix A2.3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A link between rocky exoplanet composition and stellar age." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KTBXITUK

@misc{pith2026241117358,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A link between rocky exoplanet composition and stellar age},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KTBXITUK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17358}
}
read the original abstract

Interior compositions are key for our understanding of Earth-like exoplanets. The composition of the core can influence the presence of a magnetic dynamo and the strength of gravity on the planetary surface, both of which heavily impact thermal and possible biological processes and thus the habitability for life and its evolution on the planet. However, detailed measurements of the planetary interiors are extremely challenging for small exoplanets, and existing data suggest a wide diversity in planet compositions. Hitherto, only certain photospheric chemical abundances of the host stars have been considered as tracers to explain the diversity of exoplanet compositions. Here we present a homogeneous analysis of stars hosting rocky exoplanets, with ages between 2 and 14 Gyr, revealing a correlation between rocky exoplanet compositions and the ages of the planetary systems. Denser rocky planets are found around younger stars. This suggests that the compositional diversity of rocky exoplanets can be linked to the ages of their host stars. We interpret this to be a result of chemical evolution of stars in the Milky Way, which modifies the material out of which stars and planets form. The results imply that rocky planets which form today, at similar galactocentric radii, may have different formation conditions, and thus different properties than planets which formed several billion years ago, such as the Earth.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17358 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Homogeneous data from Gaia enables the precise relative measure￾ment of ages for planet-hosting stars. Stellar radius versus effective tempera￾ture for the 25 host stars in our sample that host rocky exoplanets. Points are colour-coded by the inferred stellar ages from BASTA. Grey points connected via thin lines indicate previous, heterogeneously determined parameters for these host stars from the literature. Δ𝐹 ≈ 𝛿… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Rocky planet density and composition depends on the age of the host star. The mass and radius of small planets, colour-coded by age, alongside composition tracks from Zeng et al. (2016). The upper, light orange line corresponds to a planet with composition of 100% MgSiO3, i.e. 100% rocky mantle. The middle, dark orange line corresponds to a planet with 67.5% MgSiO3, and 32.5% Fe, providing an analogue for Earth-like… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Planet density, in log scaling on the y-axis, against stellar age on the x-axis, for planets and stars in our rocky planet sample. A clear trend can be seen, with denser planets orbiting around younger stars [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Interpolated grid of iron mass fraction values for planets at a given mass and radius, measured in Earth-scaled values. The colour bar represents the percent mass fraction of iron, as interpolated from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Younger, denser rocky planets have higher iron content [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The two leftmost panels show posteriors of the intercept and slope – defined as 𝛼 and 𝛽 in our model, of the fit between age and planet iron mass fraction %Fe using linmix (Kelly 2007). In the rightmost panel, a PDF of the Pearson correlation coefficient is plotted, sh…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Calculated iron mass percentages of planets, based on their mea￾sured masses and radii and models interpolated from a grid by Zeng et al. (2019), shown as a function of age. Upper: An orthogonal distance regression using a linear model of the form 𝛼𝑥+𝛽 is plotted in da…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Stellar mass versus age for stars in our rocky planet sample. The spread of ages is larger for lower-mass stars, which is expected as such stars live longer. Data points are colour-coded by %Fe, demonstrating a visual gradient which is stronger with age (from left to r…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: %Fe plotted as a function of stellar age, for two subsets of our sample: stars with 𝑀★ < 0.95 M⊙ (left), and 𝑀★ > 0.95 M⊙ (right). The age trend can be seen clearly in the left panel. The trend is weaker in the right-hand panel, which contains fewer stars of older ages…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Stellar metallicity [Fe/H] as a function of stellar age. No significant correlation between age and metallicity is observed, except for the highest ages, in agreement with literature. higher mass stars typically belong to a sample of stars that were born more recently…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Planetary and stellar parameters as a function of age for the 25 stars and 26 planets in this sample. Pearson correlation coefficients 𝑟 are quoted in each panel to indicate the calculated monotonic relationship between the variables. effect of stellar mass and stella…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Modelling chemical clocks -- Theoretical evidences of the space and time evolution of [s/alpha] in the Galactic disc with Gaia-ESO survey

    astro-ph.GA 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Current s-process yields fail to explain the steep [Ba/Si] vs age increase in inner-disc open clusters, requiring roughly half again as much barium in the last 3 Gyr.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

160 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    R., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/PSJ/ac0ea0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021PSJ.....2..152A 2, 152

    Adams E. R., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/PSJ/ac0ea0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021PSJ.....2..152A 2, 152

    doi:10.3847/psj/ac0ea0 2021

  2. [2]

    Adibekyan V., et al., 2021, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.abg8794 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021Sci...374..330A 374, 330

    doi:10.1126/science.abg8794 2021

  3. [3]

    Aguirre B rsen-Koch V., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2911 , 509, 4344

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2911 2022

  4. [4]

    L., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/672273 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125..989A 125, 989

    Akeson R. L., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/672273 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125..989A 125, 989

    doi:10.1086/672273 2013

  5. [5]

    Alibert Y., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322293 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...561A..41A 561, A41

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322293 2014

  6. [6]

    M., D \' az R

    Almenara J. M., D \' az R. F., Bonfils X., Udry S., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629770 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...595L...5A 595, L5

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629770 2016

  7. [7]

    Angulo C., et al., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1016/S0375-9474(99)00030-5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999NuPhA.656....3A 656, 3

    doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(99)00030-5 1999

  8. [8]

    Antonov I., Saleev V., 1980, USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 19, 252

    1980

Show all 160 references
  1. [9]

    J., Scott P., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ARA&A..47..481A 47, 481

    Asplund M., Grevesse N., Sauval A. J., Scott P., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ARA&A..47..481A 47, 481

    2009

  2. [10]

    Astropy Collaboration et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...558A..33A 558, A33

    2013 doi

  3. [11]

    Azevedo Silva T., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141520 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...657A..68A 657, A68

    2022 doi

  4. [12]

    Bashi D., Helled R., Zucker S., Mordasini C., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629922 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...604A..83B 604, A83

    2017 doi

  5. [13]

    L., Raymond S

    Bean J. L., Raymond S. N., Owen J. E., 2021, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets)] 10.1029/2020JE006639 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021JGRE..12606639B 126, e06639

    2021 doi

  6. [14]

    K., Bedell M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aae07f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...867...31B 867, 31

    Beane A., Ness M. K., Bedell M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aae07f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...867...31B 867, 31

    2018 doi

  7. [15]

    Bedell M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aad908 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...865...68B 865, 68

    2018 doi

  8. [16]

    Belokurov V., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1522 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.496.1922B 496, 1922

    2020 doi

  9. [17]

    A., Huber D., Gaidos E., van Saders J

    Berger T. A., Huber D., Gaidos E., van Saders J. L., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aada83 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...866...99B 866, 99

    2018 doi

  10. [18]

    A., Huber D., van Saders J

    Berger T. A., Huber D., van Saders J. L., Gaidos E., Tayar J., Kraus A. L., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/159/6/280 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020AJ....159..280B 159, 280

    2020 doi

  11. [19]

    A., Schlieder J

    Berger T. A., Schlieder J. E., Huber D., 2023a, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2301.11338 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230111338B p. arXiv:2301.11338

    doi arXiv

  12. [20]

    A., Schlieder J

    Berger T. A., Schlieder J. E., Huber D., Barclay T., 2023b, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2302.00009 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230200009B p. arXiv:2302.00009

    doi arXiv

  13. [21]

    Boggs P. T., E. R. J., 1989, Contemporary Mathematics, 112, 186

    1989

  14. [22]

    B \"o hm-Vitense E., 1958, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1958ZA.....46..108B 46, 108

    1958

  15. [23]

    S., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346211 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...677A..33B 677, A33

    Bonomo A. S., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346211 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...677A..33B 677, A33

    2023 doi

  16. [24]

    Bourrier V., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833154 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...619A...1B 619, A1

    2018 doi

  17. [25]

    Bourrier V., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243778 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...668A..31B 668, A31

    2022 doi

  18. [26]

    Bovy J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/29 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..216...29B 216, 29

    2015 doi

  19. [27]

    Bratley P., Fox B., 1988, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 14, 88

    1988

  20. [28]

    L., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/acad83 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023AJ....165...88B 165, 88

    Brinkman C. L., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/acad83 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023AJ....165...88B 165, 88

    2023 doi

  21. [29]

    Brinkman C., Polanski A., Huber D., Weiss L., Valencia D., Plotnykov M., 2024, in AAS/Division for Extreme Solar Systems Abstracts. p. 301.03

    2024

  22. [30]

    M., Bayliss D., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac58ff , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022AJ....163..197B 163, 197

    Bryant E. M., Bayliss D., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac58ff , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022AJ....163..197B 163, 197

    2022 doi

  23. [31]

    J., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/210/2/19 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJS..210...19B 210, 19

    Burke C. J., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/210/2/19 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJS..210...19B 210, 19

    2014 doi

  24. [32]

    Cabral N., Guilbert-Lepoutre A., Bitsch B., Lagarde N., Diakite S., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243882 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...673A.117C 673, A117

    2023 doi

  25. [33]

    Chen J., Kipping D., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/17 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...834...17C 834, 17

    2017 doi

  26. [34]

    Chen D.-C., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac0f08 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....162..100C 162, 100

    2021 doi

  27. [35]

    Chen D.-C., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac641f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022AJ....163..249C 163, 249

    2022 doi

  28. [36]

    Christensen-Dalsgaard J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s10509-007-9689-z , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008Ap&SS.316..113C 316, 113

    2008 doi

  29. [37]

    R., Grand R

    Ciuc a I., Kawata D., Miglio A., Davies G. R., Grand R. J. J., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab639 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.503.2814C 503, 2814

    2021 doi

  30. [38]

    L., et al., 2022, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2206.05864 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv220605864C p

    Creevey O. L., et al., 2022, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2206.05864 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv220605864C p. arXiv:2206.05864

    2022 doi arXiv

  31. [39]

    Cropper M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201832763 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...616A...5C 616, A5

    2018 doi

  32. [40]

    G., Mihalas B

    Daeppen W., Mihalas D., Hummer D. G., Mihalas B. W., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1086/166650 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988ApJ...332..261D 332, 261

    1988 doi

  33. [41]

    N., Zeng L., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3a3b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...883...79D 883, 79

    Dai F., Masuda K., Winn J. N., Zeng L., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3a3b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...883...79D 883, 79

    2019 doi

  34. [42]

    Dai F., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac02bd , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....162...62D 162, 62

    2021 doi

  35. [43]

    Demory B.-O., Gillon M., Madhusudhan N., Queloz D., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2239 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.455.2018D 455, 2018

    2016 doi

  36. [44]

    Dorn C., Khan A., Heng K., Connolly J. A. D., Alibert Y., Benz W., Tackley P., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201424915 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...577A..83D 577, A83

    2015 doi

  37. [45]

    D., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/800/2/135 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...800..135D 800, 135

    Dressing C. D., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/800/2/135 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...800..135D 800, 135

    2015 doi

  38. [46]

    K., Tremblay P.-E., G \"a nsicke B

    Elms A. K., Tremblay P.-E., G \"a nsicke B. T., Koester D., Hollands M. A., Gentile Fusillo N. P., Cunningham T., Apps K., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2908 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.517.4557E 517, 4557

    2022 doi

  39. [47]

    G., Guinan E

    Engle S. G., Guinan E. F., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acf472 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...954L..50E 954, L50

    2023 doi

  40. [48]

    Espinoza N., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3150 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.491.2982E 491, 2982

    2020 doi

  41. [49]

    W., Alexander D

    Ferguson J. W., Alexander D. R., Allard F., Barman T., Bodnarik J. G., Hauschildt P. H., Heffner-Wong A., Tamanai A., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/428642 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...623..585F 623, 585

    2005 doi

  42. [50]

    Fogtmann-Schulz A., Hinrup B., Van Eylen V., Christensen-Dalsgaard J., Kjeldsen H., Silva Aguirre V., Tingley B., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/781/2/67 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...781...67F 781, 67

    2014 doi

  43. [51]

    Formicola A., et al., 2004, @doi [Physics Letters B] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2004.03.092 , 591, 61

    2004 doi

  44. [52]

    Fox B., 1986, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 12, 362

    1986

  45. [53]

    Fridlund M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201730822 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...604A..16F 604, A16

    2017 doi

  46. [54]

    Frustagli G., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936689 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...633A.133F 633, A133

    2020 doi

  47. [55]

    J., Petigura E

    Fulton B. J., Petigura E. A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aae828 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156..264F 156, 264

    2018 doi

  48. [56]

    J., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa80eb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....154..109F 154, 109

    Fulton B. J., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa80eb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....154..109F 154, 109

    2017 doi

  49. [57]

    J., Petigura E

    Fulton B. J., Petigura E. A., Blunt S., Sinukoff E., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/aaaaa8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASP..130d4504F 130, 044504

    2018 doi

  50. [58]

    Ginsburg A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aafc33 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....157...98G 157, 98

    2019 doi

  51. [59]

    Ginski C., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw049 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.457.2173G 457, 2173

    2016 doi

  52. [60]

    M., Schlafly E., Zucker C., Speagle J

    Green G. M., Schlafly E., Zucker C., Speagle J. S., Finkbeiner D., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5362 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...887...93G 887, 93

    2019 doi

  53. [61]

    W., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201730885 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...608A..93G 608, A93

    Guenther E. W., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201730885 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...608A..93G 608, A93

    2017 doi

  54. [62]

    E., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1230 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487...24G 487, 24

    Gupta A., Schlichting H. E., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1230 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487...24G 487, 24

    2019 doi

  55. [63]

    J., Lada E

    Haisch Karl E. J., Lada E. A., Lada C. J., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/320685 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...553L.153H 553, L153

    2001 doi

  56. [64]

    Hammer J., et al., 2005, @doi [Nuclear Physics A] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.05.066 , 758, 363

    2005 doi

  57. [65]

    Hartmann L., Calvet N., Gullbring E., D'Alessio P., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305277 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...495..385H 495, 385

    1998 doi

  58. [66]

    L., et al., 2018, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab158 , 856, 125

    Hidalgo S. L., et al., 2018, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab158 , 856, 125

    2018 doi

  59. [67]

    Hidalgo D., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201937080 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...636A..89H 636, A89

    2020 doi

  60. [68]

    Ho C. S. K., Van Eylen V., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3802 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519.4056H 519, 4056

    2023 doi

  61. [69]

    A., Tremblay P.-E., G \"a nsicke B

    Hollands M. A., Tremblay P.-E., G \"a nsicke B. T., Koester D., Gentile-Fusillo N. P., 2021, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-020-01296-7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021NatAs...5..451H 5, 451

    2021 doi

  62. [70]

    Huber D., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/127 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...767..127H 767, 127

    2013 doi

  63. [71]

    Huber D., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac3000 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022AJ....163...79H 163, 79

    2022 doi

  64. [72]

    G., Mihalas D., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1086/166600 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988ApJ...331..794H 331, 794

    Hummer D. G., Mihalas D., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1086/166600 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988ApJ...331..794H 331, 794

    1988 doi

  65. [73]

    D., 2007, @doi [Computing in Science & Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 , 9, 90

    Hunter J. D., 2007, @doi [Computing in Science & Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 , 9, 90

    2007 doi

  66. [74]

    A., Rogers F

    Iglesias C. A., Rogers F. J., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/177381 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...464..943I 464, 943

    1996 doi

  67. [75]

    R., Carter B., Howard A

    Isaacson H., Kane S. R., Carter B., Howard A. W., Weiss L., Petigura E. A., Fulton B., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad077b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...961...85I 961, 85

    2024 doi

  68. [76]

    Joe S., Kuo F., 2003, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 29, 49

    2003

  69. [77]

    A., Collier Cameron A., Wilson T

    John A. A., Collier Cameron A., Wilson T. G., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1814 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515.3975J 515, 3975

    2022 doi

  70. [78]

    C., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519947 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...665.1489K 665, 1489

    Kelly B. C., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519947 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...665.1489K 665, 1489

    2007 doi

  71. [79]

    Kempton E. M. R., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-023-06159-5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Natur.620...67K 620, 67

    2023 doi

  72. [80]

    Springer Berlin, @doi 10.1007/978-3-642-30304-3

    Kippenhahn R., Weigert A., Weiss A., 2012, Stellar Structure and Evolution. Springer Berlin, @doi 10.1007/978-3-642-30304-3

    2012 doi

  73. [81]

    S., Fegley Bruce J., Schaefer L., Ford E

    Kite E. S., Fegley Bruce J., Schaefer L., Ford E. B., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6ffb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...891..111K 891, 111

    2020 doi

  74. [82]

    R., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aafe83 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....157..116K 157, 116

    Kosiarek M. R., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aafe83 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....157..116K 157, 116

    2019 doi

  75. [83]

    Kreidberg L., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature12888 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014Natur.505...69K 505, 69

    2014 doi

  76. [84]

    Lacedelli G., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3728 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501.4148L 501, 4148

    2021 doi

  77. [85]

    Lam K. W. F., et al., 2021, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.aay3253 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021Sci...374.1271L 374, 1271

    2021 doi

  78. [86]

    V., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac0d06 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....162...75L 162, 75

    Lester K. V., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac0d06 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....162...75L 162, 75

    2021 doi

  79. [87]

    Lim O., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acf7c4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...955L..22L 955, L22

    2023 doi

  80. [88]

    Lindegren L., 2018, R e-normalising the astrometric chi-square in G aia D R 2, GAIA-C3-TN-LU-LL-124, http://www.rssd.esa.int/doc_fetch.php?id=3757412

    2018

  81. [89]

    Lindegren L., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039653 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...649A...4L 649, A4

    2021 doi

  82. [90]

    D., Fortney J

    Lopez E. D., Fortney J. J., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...792....1L 792, 1

    2014 doi

  83. [91]

    L \'o pez-Morales M., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/204 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....152..204L 152, 204

    2016 doi

  84. [92]

    N., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/172 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...835..172L 835, 172

    Lund M. N., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/172 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...835..172L 835, 172

    2017 doi

  85. [93]

    Lundin R., Lammer H., Ribas I., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11214-007-9176-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007SSRv..129..245L 129, 245

    2007 doi

  86. [94]

    W., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/210/2/20 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJS..210...20M 210, 20

    Marcy G. W., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/210/2/20 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJS..210...20M 210, 20

    2014 doi

  87. [95]

    M., Marinoni S., Fabrizio M., Altavilla G., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834142 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...621A.144M 621, A144

    Marrese P. M., Marinoni S., Fabrizio M., Altavilla G., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834142 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...621A.144M 621, A144

    2019 doi

  88. [96]

    F., Yoshizaki T., 2021, @doi [Progress in Earth and Planetary Science] 10.1186/s40645-021-00429-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021PEPS....8...39M 8, 39

    McDonough W. F., Yoshizaki T., 2021, @doi [Progress in Earth and Planetary Science] 10.1186/s40645-021-00429-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021PEPS....8...39M 8, 39

    2021 doi

  89. [97]

    Mel \'e ndez J., Asplund M., Gustafsson B., Yong D., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/704/1/L66 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...704L..66M 704, L66

    2009 doi

  90. [98]

    G., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1086/166601 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988ApJ...331..815M 331, 815

    Mihalas D., Dappen W., Hummer D. G., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1086/166601 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988ApJ...331..815M 331, 815

    1988 doi

  91. [99]

    G., Mihalas B

    Mihalas D., Hummer D. G., Mihalas B. W., Daeppen W., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1086/168383 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990ApJ...350..300M 350, 300

    1990 doi

  92. [100]

    Mikal-Evans T., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aca90b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023AJ....165...84M 165, 84

    2023 doi

  93. [101]

    Mugrauer M., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2673 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.490.5088M 490, 5088

    2019 doi

  94. [102]

    Murgas F., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202244459 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...668A.158M 668, A158

    2022 doi

  95. [103]

    Müller R., Mather B., Dutkiewicz A. e. a., 2022, @doi [Nature] doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04420-x , 605, 629

    2022 doi

  96. [104]

    O'Neill C., Lowman J., Wasiliev J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.icarus.2020.114025 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020Icar..35214025O 352, 114025

    2020

  97. [105]

    F., Bouchy F., Helled R., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936482 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...634A..43O 634, A43

    Otegi J. F., Bouchy F., Helled R., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936482 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...634A..43O 634, A43

    2020 doi

  98. [106]

    E., Wu Y., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/105 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...775..105O 775, 105

    Owen J. E., Wu Y., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/105 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...775..105O 775, 105

    2013 doi

  99. [107]

    Ram \' rez I., Mel \'e ndez J., Asplund M., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913038 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...508L..17R 508, L17

    2009 doi

  100. [108]

    Rauer H., et al., 2014, @doi [Experimental Astronomy] 10.1007/s10686-014-9383-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ExA....38..249R 38, 249

    2014 doi

  101. [109]

    Recio-Blanco A., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425030 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...585A..93R 585, A93

    2016 doi

  102. [110]

    Recio-Blanco A., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243750 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674A..29R 674, A29

    2023 doi

  103. [111]

    A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/801/1/41 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...801...41R 801, 41

    Rogers L. A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/801/1/41 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...801...41R 801, 41

    2015 doi

  104. [112]

    J., Iglesias C

    Rogers F. J., Iglesias C. A., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191659 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJS...79..507R 79, 507

    1992 doi

  105. [113]

    J., Nayfonov A., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/341894 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...576.1064R 576, 1064

    Rogers F. J., Nayfonov A., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/341894 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...576.1064R 576, 1064

    2002 doi

  106. [114]

    J., Swenson F

    Rogers F. J., Swenson F. J., Iglesias C. A., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/176705 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...456..902R 456, 902

    1996 doi

  107. [115]

    M., Ballard S., Yuxi Lu Angus R., Hogg D

    Sagear S., Price-Whelan A. M., Ballard S., Yuxi Lu Angus R., Hogg D. W., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2403.09878 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240309878S p. arXiv:2403.09878

    2024 doi arXiv

  108. [116]

    Salaris M., Chieffi A., Straniero O., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/173105 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...414..580S 414, 580

    1993 doi

  109. [117]

    E., 1955, @doi [ ] 10.1086/145971 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1955ApJ...121..161S 121, 161

    Salpeter E. E., 1955, @doi [ ] 10.1086/145971 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1955ApJ...121..161S 121, 161

    1955 doi

  110. [118]

    C., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321286 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...556A.150S 556, A150

    Santos N. C., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321286 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...556A.150S 556, A150

    2013 doi

  111. [119]

    C., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731359 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...608A..94S 608, A94

    Santos N. C., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731359 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...608A..94S 608, A94

    2017 doi

  112. [120]

    A., Militzer B., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/521346 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...669.1279S 669, 1279

    Seager S., Kuchner M., Hier-Majumder C. A., Militzer B., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/521346 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...669.1279S 669, 1279

    2007 doi

  113. [121]

    Selsis F., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.icarus.2007.04.010 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007Icar..191..453S 191, 453

    2007 doi

  114. [122]

    Shah O., Helled R., Alibert Y., Mezger K., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac410d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...926..217S 926, 217

    2022 doi

  115. [123]

    Silva Aguirre V., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1388 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.452.2127S 452, 2127

    2015 doi

  116. [124]

    Silva Aguirre V., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/173 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...835..173S 835, 173

    2017 doi

  117. [125]

    N., Haywood M., Di Matteo P., Lehnert M

    Snaith O. N., Haywood M., Di Matteo P., Lehnert M. D., Combes F., Katz D., G \'o mez A., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/781/2/L31 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...781L..31S 781, L31

    2014 doi

  118. [126]

    D., Combes F., Katz D., G \'o mez A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201424281 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...578A..87S 578, A87

    Snaith O., Haywood M., Di Matteo P., Lehnert M. D., Combes F., Katz D., G \'o mez A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201424281 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...578A..87S 578, A87

    2015 doi

  119. [127]

    Sobol I., 1977, USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 16, 236

    1977

  120. [128]

    Sobol I., Levithan Y., 1976, IPM Akademii Nauk SSSR

    1976

  121. [129]

    R., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130806 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ARA&A..48..581S 48, 581

    Soderblom D. R., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130806 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ARA&A..48..581S 48, 581

    2010 doi

  122. [130]

    Sotin C., Grasset O., Mocquet A., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.icarus.2007.04.006 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007Icar..191..337S 191, 337

    2007 doi

  123. [131]

    G., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz664 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.485.3981S 485, 3981

    Sousa S. G., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz664 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.485.3981S 485, 3981

    2019 doi

  124. [132]

    G., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141584 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...656A..53S 656, A53

    Sousa S. G., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141584 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...656A..53S 656, A53

    2021 doi

  125. [133]

    R., Huber D., van Saders J., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4bbc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...927...31T 927, 31

    Tayar J., Claytor Z. R., Huber D., van Saders J., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4bbc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...927...31T 927, 31

    2022 doi

  126. [134]

    B., 1963, @doi [Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A] 10.1098/rspa.1963.0130 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1963RSPSA.274..274T 274, 274

    Taylor J. B., 1963, @doi [Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A] 10.1098/rspa.1963.0130 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1963RSPSA.274..274T 274, 274

    1963

  127. [135]

    Toledo-Padr \'o n B., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038187 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...641A..92T 641, A92

    2020 doi

  128. [136]

    L., Asplund M., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527848 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...590A..32T 590, A32

    Tucci Maia M., Ram \' rez I., Mel \'e ndez J., Bedell M., Bean J. L., Asplund M., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527848 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...590A..32T 590, A32

    2016 doi

  129. [137]

    Ulla A., et al., 2022, Gaia DR3 documentation Chapter 11: Astrophysical parameters , https://gea.esac.esa.int/archive/documentation/GDR3/index.html

    2022

  130. [138]

    T., Panero W

    Unterborn C. T., Panero W. R., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7f79 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...845...61U 845, 61

    2017 doi

  131. [139]

    T., Kabbes J

    Unterborn C. T., Kabbes J. E., Pigott J. S., Reaman D. M., Panero W. R., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/793/2/124 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...793..124U 793, 124

    2014 doi

  132. [140]

    T., Foley B

    Unterborn C. T., Foley B. J., Desch S. J., Young P. A., Vance G., Chiffelle L., Kane S. R., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6596 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...930L...6U 930, L6

    2022 doi

  133. [141]

    D., O'Connell R

    Valencia D., Sasselov D. D., O'Connell R. J., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519554 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...665.1413V 665, 1413

    2007 doi

  134. [142]

    Vallenari A., et al., 2022, Gaia DR3 documentation Chapter 19: Performance verification , https://gea.esac.esa.int/archive/documentation/GDR3/index.html

    2022

  135. [143]

    S., Kjeldsen H., Owen J

    Van Eylen V., Agentoft C., Lundkvist M. S., Kjeldsen H., Owen J. E., Fulton B. J., Petigura E., Snellen I., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1783 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479.4786V 479, 4786

    2018 doi

  136. [144]

    Van Eylen V., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2143 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.507.2154V 507, 2154

    2021 doi

  137. [145]

    Vanderburg A., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/829/1/L9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...829L...9V 829, L9

    2016 doi

  138. [146]

    Viscasillas V \'a zquez C., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142937 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...660A.135V 660, A135

    2022 doi

  139. [147]

    M., Marcy G

    Weiss L. M., Marcy G. W., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/783/1/L6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...783L...6W 783, L6

    2014 doi

  140. [148]

    Weiss A., Schlattl H., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s10509-007-9606-5 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008Ap26SS.316...99W 316, 99

    2008 doi

  141. [149]

    M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/768/1/14 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...768...14W 768, 14

    Weiss L. M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/768/1/14 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...768...14W 768, 14

    2013 doi

  142. [150]

    M., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/abd409 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....161...56W 161, 56

    Weiss L. M., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/abd409 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....161...56W 161, 56

    2021 doi

  143. [151]

    N., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/737/1/L18 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...737L..18W 737, L18

    Winn J. N., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/737/1/L18 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...737L..18W 737, L18

    2011 doi

  144. [152]

    A., Ford E

    Wolfgang A., Rogers L. A., Ford E. B., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/19 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...825...19W 825, 19

    2016 doi

  145. [153]

    D., Abbot D

    Yang H., Komacek T. D., Abbot D. S., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1d60 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...876L..27Y 876, L27

    2019 doi

  146. [154]

    Yang J.-Y., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad0368 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023AJ....166..243Y 166, 243

    2023 doi

  147. [155]

    Zeng L., Seager S., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/591807 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008PASP..120..983Z 120, 983

    2008 doi

  148. [156]

    D., Jacobsen S

    Zeng L., Sasselov D. D., Jacobsen S. B., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/819/2/127 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...819..127Z 819, 127

    2016 doi

  149. [157]

    Zeng L., et al., 2019, @doi [Proceedings of the National Academy of Science] 10.1073/pnas.1812905116 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PNAS..116.9723Z 116, 9723

    2019 doi

  150. [158]

    Zieba S., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-023-06232-z , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Natur.620..746Z 620, 746

    2023 doi

  151. [159]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

  152. [160]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.