Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

On Twisted $A_{2n}$ Class-S Theories

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper derives a closed-form formula for the Coulomb branch dimension of any twisted $A_{2n}$ class-S theory, driven by an order-reversing map $d'$ on $C_n$ nilpotent orbits, and uses it to identify known $\mathcal{N}=2$ SCFTs and…

desk verdict A serious, well-checked classification result that fills the last gap in three-punctured sphere class-S theories, even though the load-bearing map d' is proposed rather than derived. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17675 v1 pith:2QYHZEVN submitted 2024-11-26 hep-th

Jacques Distler , Grant Elliot This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords twistedA2nclass-StheoriesCoulombbranchdimensionnilpotentorbitsmetaplecticspecialmapArgyres-DouglasS-dualityglobalanomalyHitchinsystem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Twisted $A_{2n}$ class-S theories are 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ SCFTs built by compactifying the 6d $A_{2n}$ $(2,0)$ theory on a Riemann surface with an outer-automorphism twist; their Coulomb branches have resisted computation. This paper claims a general formula: the Coulomb branch dimension is a sum of contributions from the surface's genus and from each puncture, with twisted punctures weighted by a new order-reversing map $d'$ on $C_n$ nilpotent orbits. The map $d'$ is proposed to be the metaplectic special map, which fixes the residue of the Higgs field at twisted punctures and the Higgs branch of the associated $T_\rho(\mathrm{Sp}(n)')$ theories. The authors then use the formula to identify many known $\mathcal{N}=2$ SCFTs, including Argyres-Douglas theories, and to reproduce dualities among them. If correct, the paper closes a long-standing gap in the class-S classification.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the order-reversing map $d'$ on the set of $C_n$ nilpotent orbits, i.e. partitions of $2n$ in which even parts appear with even multiplicity. The paper proposes that $d'$ is the metaplectic special map, computable by appending a part $1$ to the partition, taking the transpose, applying the $C$-collapse, and subtracting one from the last part. This map satisfies $d'^3=d'$, sends the regular orbit to the minimal orbit, and fixes both the Hitchin-orbit residue at twisted punctures and the Higgs branch of the $T_\rho(\mathrm{Sp}(n)')$ theories. Equation (1) packages $d'$ into a closed-form Coulomb-branch dimension. The second mechanism is the reversed nilpotent-Higgsing rule, derived from the $\mathrm{Sp}(n)$ global anomaly: the anomaly forces an extended Coulomb branch, so a highest-weight Higgsing of an anomalous $\mathrm{Sp}(n)$ is rank-preserving, with the odd/even level behaviour swapped relative to ordinary class-S theories.

What would settle it

Compute the Hitchin moduli space for a specific twisted $A_4$ fixture, for instance the sphere with punctures $[2^2]$, $[2,1^2]$, and $[3,2]$ (fixture 14 of Table 2), and read off the graded Coulomb branch dimensions from the spectral curve. The paper predicts $\{3,4,\tfrac52\}$; if the Hitchin calculation gives any other spectrum, or if the twisted puncture's Hitchin orbit is not $d'([2^2])=[2^2]$, the central formula fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Equation (1): for a twisted $A_{2n}$ theory with untwisted punctures $O_i$ and twisted punctures $O^t_j$ on a genus-$g$ surface, $$\dim \mathrm{Coulomb} = (g-1)\dim J + \sum_i \dim d(O_i) + \sum_j \left(\dim d'(O^t_j) + \tfrac{1}{2}(\dim J - \dim G^\vee)\right),$$ where $J$ is the relevant Hitchin-base datum of the untwisted theory, $G^\vee$ is the Langlands-dual group, $d$ is the Spaltenstein map, and $d'$ is the proposed metaplectic-special order-reversing map on $C_n$ nilpotent orbits. The paper argues that the previously mysterious twisted-puncture sector is governed by $d'$, which determines both the residue of the Hitchin field at twisted punctures and the Higgs branch of $T_\rho(\mathrm{Sp}(n)')$ three-dimensional mirrors. A key consequence is a reversed nilpotent-Higgsing rule: for an $\mathrm{Sp}(n)$ factor carrying the global anomaly, a highest-weight Higgsing at odd level removes a Coulomb-branch parameter of dimension $k/2$ rather than replacing dimension $k-1$ by $(k-1)/2$, and at even level performs the replacement. The paper verifies the proposal in twisted $A_4$, $A_6$, and partially $A_8$ examples by matching known SCFTs, Schur indices, S-duality frames, and central charges.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the order-reversing map $d'$ is the metaplectic special map, so it gives both the Higgs branch of $T_\rho(\mathrm{Sp}(n)')$ and the Hitchin-orbit residue at twisted punctures; the full Hitchin-system derivation of this identification is deferred to the companion paper [28].

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Equation (1) makes the Coulomb branch dimension of any twisted $A_{2n}$ class-S theory a routine computation from genus and puncture data, removing the long-standing obstruction for this sector.
  • The identification of known SCFTs such as $D_2(SU(5))$, $R_{2,4}$, $C_2U_1$, and $(A_1,D_6)$ as twisted $A_4$ or $A_6$ theories gives a uniform origin for their Coulomb branch spectra and central charges.
  • The S-duality frames constructed in Section 3.4, matching theory $T$ and the $D_2(SU(3))$ coupling, show that Argyres-Douglas dualities follow from the puncture formula.
  • Fractional (half-integer) graded Coulomb branch dimensions emerge naturally from the odd-degree invariant constraints of the twisted Hitchin system, confirming the earlier conjecture of [16].
  • The same map $d'$ determines the Higgs branch of $T_\rho(\mathrm{Sp}(n)')$ 3d mirrors, so the 3d mirror Coulomb and Higgs dimensions serve as cross-checks across all ranks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If $d'$ is the correct map, it should also govern S-duality of boundary conditions in 4d $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM obtained by compactifying the $A_{2n}$ theory on a torus with a twist line; this is the direction the authors flag for future work.
  • The reversed nilpotent-Higgsing rule for anomalous $\mathrm{Sp}(n)$ factors is likely a general feature of any SCFT with such a symmetry, not only twisted $A_{2n}$; it could be tested in S-fold and other constructions with anomalous flavour groups.
  • The local puncture-replacement method combined with $d'$ should extend to all higher ranks: the paper's $A_8$ table can be generated systematically, and the same map should fix the irregular-fixture content for the entire $A_{2n}$ family.
  • The proposed isomorphism between fixtures 8 and 9 of the $A_4$ table, arising from genuinely different RG flows without an enhanced-symmetry parent, suggests a new class of accidental IR equivalences; checking the chiral algebra or 3d mirror would test whether the identification is exact.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the twisted A2n sector of class-S theories, a sector for which the Coulomb branch has previously been poorly understood. Its central proposal is Eq. (1), which gives the Coulomb branch dimension of any twisted A2n theory as (g-1) dim J plus sums over untwisted punctures of dim d(O_i) and over twisted punctures of dim d'(O^t_j) + 1/2(dim J - dim G∨), where d is the Spaltenstein map and d' is an order-reversing map on Cn nilpotent orbits. The authors identify d' with the metaplectic special map of [39], determine many graded Coulomb branch contributions in twisted A4, A6, and A8 theories, and use these to identify known N=2 SCFTs such as R2,4, D2(SU(5)), and certain Argyres-Douglas theories, including a reproduction of known S-dualities. The Hitchin-system derivation of d' is deferred to a companion paper [28].

Significance. If Eq. (1) is correct, it fills a genuine gap in the class-S classification and gives a predictive formula for an infinite family of N=2 SCFTs. The paper's strengths are its many concrete consistency checks: explicit graded Coulomb branch dimensions in Tables 2, 5, and the A8 table, Shapere-Tachikawa central-charge checks, Schur index matching to order tau^8 or tau^12 in several cases, 3d mirror checks, and the reproduction of S-dualities in Sections 3.4 and 5. However, the central map d' is introduced as a proposal rather than derived, and much of the supporting puncture data is calibrated from known SCFT fixtures. The paper therefore presents a well-supported conjecture with extensive evidence rather than a complete derivation; the load-bearing identification with the metaplectic special map needs to be established or independently tested before Eq. (1) can be taken as proven.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.2, Eq. (1)] The central dimension formula depends on dim d'(O^t_j), but the paper states only 'We propose that this is the map that describes the Higgs branch of Tρ(Sp(n)′) theories, in addition to the residue of the Higgs field at the twisted punctures,' and defers the Hitchin-system derivation to [28]. The evidence given before Eq. (1) consists of five heuristic properties and the small set of examples in Table 1. The rejection of the rival map of [38] relies on d'^3 = d', whose argument assumes the very Tρ(Sp(n)′)/Hitchin-orbit dictionary that is at stake. Since a wrong d' would change every graded Coulomb branch dimension in Sections 3–5 and would alter the identification of known SCFTs, this is a load-bearing gap. The authors should either include the Hitchin derivation, or provide a systematic independent test, for example by computing the full Hilbert series of Tρ(Sp(n)′) for all Cn orbits in low rank and comparing with d'(O).
  2. [§3.1 and Tables 2, 5] The puncture contributions are largely inferred by fitting to known SCFT data through the locality principle of Section 3.1, and then Eq. (1) is used to produce the same fixtures. This gives a calibration flavor: agreement with the input data cannot validate Eq. (1). For example, in Section 3.1.1 the graded dimensions of R2,4 and its Higgsed theory are used to fix the behavior of the replacement [1^4]→[2,1^2], and in Section 4.1.1 the same method fixes the A6 replacements. The paper should clearly label which entries in Tables 2 and 5 are fitted inputs and which are genuine predictions, and should provide at least one predicted quantity that is verified after the fit, such as a Schur index or central charge computed from the proposed puncture data that was not used in the calibration.
  3. [§2.1 and §2.2] The reversed nilpotent-Higgsing behavior for Sp(n) factors is justified by Witten's global anomaly and by the statement that the change in rank 'must be one,' but this rank-change claim is not derived. This behavior underlies properties 3 and 4 of d' and hence the selection of the metaplectic special map. The paper should clarify whether the rank-change statement is an independent input, a consequence of the proposed 3d mirror dictionary, or a consistency check, and should provide a derivation or a precise reference.
  4. [§3.3 and §4.3] The irregular-fixture constructions rely on assertions such as 'the only possible gluing' and 'the only candidate is the rank-one SU(3) instanton theory' (Sections 3.3 and 4.3). These uniqueness claims are plausible but are not justified in detail. Since irregular fixtures are then used to determine puncture data (e.g., [4,1^2] in Section 4.1.5), the uniqueness should be stated as an assumption or proven from the classification of the relevant punctures.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.2, Eq. (1)] The notation dim J and dim G∨ is not defined in the text. Please state explicitly that these are the complex dimensions of the relevant Lie algebras and specify the normalization used in Eq. (1).
  2. [§2.2] The algorithmic description of the metaplectic special map ('Append 1 to a partition, then take the transpose and C-collapse... subtract one from the last part') is too terse for a physics reader. Please define C-collapse or give a precise reference with page or proposition number.
  3. [§2.1] There are several typos in Section 2.1: 'Shapere-Tachika wa relation' should be 'Shapere-Tachikawa relation,' and 'the ab ove quotient' should be 'the above quotient.' Please proofread the text.
  4. [§3.1.1] In the discussion of the wild-puncture example, the level of the Sp(2) symmetry is written as 13/3 and later as 10/3 in the text; the relation between these levels and the regular-puncture level should be explained more explicitly.
  5. [§4.2, Table 5] The table header lists a set {2,3,4,5,6,7,3/2,5/2,7/2} that appears to be the universal set of graded dimensions for twisted A6; this should be stated in the caption, and the meaning of the entries in the 'Graded CB Dimensions' column should be clarified (which entries are puncture contributions versus fixture contributions).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the twisted-puncture map d′ is a testable proposal backed by external Hilbert-series and mathematical results, and the known-SCFT checks are consistency tests rather than fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central formula (1) is not equivalent to its inputs by construction. The map d′ is introduced as a proposal identified with the metaplectic special map of [39], an independent mathematical construction, and constrained by the independent Hilbert-series calculations of [38] (Table 1) and by physical expectations (free hypers at the regular puncture, global anomaly of Sp(n)). Equation (1) is then used to compute/normalize puncture contributions, but the known theories used in Sections 3–4 (R2,4, D2(SU(5)), the rank-two catalog [42], etc.) serve as consistency checks, explicitly labeled as such (e.g., 'This result is not surprising as it was argued in [44]...'; S-duality check in Section 3.4). The main weakness is completeness, not circularity: the Hitchin-system derivation of d′ and of Eq. (1) is explicitly deferred to the companion paper [28], and Section 2.2 says 'We propose that this is the map...'. A deferred proof and a testable conjecture are correctness risks, not reductions of the prediction to its inputs. Self-citations [15,31,32,52] provide published background and technique; none of them is used to define the predicted quantity. No specific equation was found where Eq. (1) reduces to fitted data or to a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a conjectured map d' and on puncture data calibrated from known theories. No free continuous parameters are fitted, but the puncture dimension tables are effectively empirical inputs. The mathematical map d' is taken from [39], not invented here.

free parameters (1)
  • Puncture graded CB dimension contributions = Tables 2, 5, and Section 5
    Determined by matching known SCFT data via locality rather than derived from the Hitchin system; these values feed Eq (1).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption A highest weight nilpotent Higgsing of an Sp(n) flavor factor in a twisted A2n theory acts oppositely to other class-S types: odd level k removes a CB parameter of dimension k/2; even level k replaces a dimension k-1 parameter with one of dimension (k-1)/2.
    Introduced in Section 2.1, justified via Witten's global anomaly and the extended Coulomb branch, not derived from a microscopic computation.
  • ad hoc to paper The order-reversing map d' on C_n orbits equals the metaplectic special map of [39] and determines the Higgs branch of Tρ(Sp(n)') and the Hitchin orbit at twisted punctures.
    Proposed in Section 2.2 on the basis of properties 1-5 and consistency; the Hitchin system derivation is deferred to companion paper [28].
  • domain assumption Puncture contributions to graded Coulomb branch dimensions are local: replacing the same puncture on different fixtures produces the same change.
    Following [16], used throughout Sections 3 and 4 to transfer data between theories.
  • domain assumption The UV Coulomb branch is freely generated.
    Stated in footnote 3, Section 2.1; used in the Shapere-Tachikawa argument determining the change in nv.
  • domain assumption d'^3 = d' and special orbits are C-partitions where every odd part i has an odd number of even parts greater than i.
    Argued from self-mirror Tρ(Sp(n)') and absence of further Higgsings, Section 2.2; not proven from the Hitchin system.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On Twisted $A_{2n}$ Class-S Theories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2QYHZEVN

@misc{pith2026241117675,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On Twisted $A_2n$ Class-S Theories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2QYHZEVN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17675}
}
abstract

In this paper, we investigate the twisted $A_{2n}$ sector of class-S theories. Heretofore, the Coulomb branches of such theories have been poorly understood. In this, and a companion paper, we make progress in our understanding of them. In particular, we find a formula for the dimension of the Coulomb branch of any twisted $A_{2n}$ class-S theory. Deferring a systematic analysis to the companion paper, we here determine many contributions of punctures to the graded Coulomb branch dimensions, and in some low rank cases, all of them. We are then able to identify a variety of known 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ SCFTs with twisted $A_{2n}$ theories, and reproduce many of their known properties, such as S-duality amongst certain Argyres-Douglas theories.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Even More On Twisted $A_{2n}$ Class-S Theories

    hep-th 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An order-4 twist automorphism and local polynomial constraints determine the Coulomb branch Hitchin systems for twisted A_{2n} class-S punctures, with explicit Seiberg-Witten curves for examples.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [39]

    Repr´ esentations quadratiques unipotentes des g roupes classiques p-adiques,

    C. Mœglin, “Repr´ esentations quadratiques unipotentes des g roupes classiques p-adiques,” Duke Math. J. 84 no. 2, (1996) 267–332

    1996

  2. [28]

    Distler and G

    J. Distler and G. Elliot, in preparation

    work page

  3. [38]

    T σ ρ (G) theories and their Hilbert series,

    S. Cremonesi, A. Hanany, N. Mekareeya, and A. Zaffaroni, “ T σ ρ (G) theories and their Hilbert series,” JHEP 01 (2015) 150, arXiv:1410.1548 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2015

  4. [1]

    N = 2 dualities,

    D. Gaiotto, “ N = 2 dualities,” JHEP 08 (2012) 034, arXiv:0904.2715 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2012

  5. [2]

    Wall-crossing, Hitchin s ystems, and the WKB approximation,

    D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore, and A. Neitzke, “Wall-crossing, Hitchin s ystems, and the WKB approximation,” arXiv:0907.3987 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  6. [3]

    Nilpotent orbits an d codimension-two defects of 6d N = (2, 0) theories,

    O. Chacaltana, J. Distler, and Y. Tachikawa, “Nilpotent orbits an d codimension-two defects of 6d N = (2, 0) theories,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A28 (2013) 1340006, arXiv:1203.2930 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2013

  7. [4]

    Tinkertoys for Gaiotto duality,

    O. Chacaltana and J. Distler, “Tinkertoys for Gaiotto duality,” JHEP 1011 (2010) 099, arXiv:1008.5203 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2010

  8. [5]

    Tinkertoys for the DN series,

    O. Chacaltana and J. Distler, “Tinkertoys for the DN series,” JHEP 02 (2013) 110, arXiv:1106.5410 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2013

Show all 54 references
  1. [6]

    Gaiotto duality for the twisted A2N −1 series,

    O. Chacaltana, J. Distler, and Y. Tachikawa, “Gaiotto duality for the twisted A2N −1 series,” JHEP 1505 (2015) 075, arXiv:1212.3952 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  2. [7]

    Tinkertoys for the twis ted D-series,

    O. Chacaltana, J. Distler, and A. Trimm, “Tinkertoys for the twis ted D-series,” JHEP 1504 (2015) 173, arXiv:1309.2299 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  3. [8]

    Tinkertoys for the E6 theory,

    O. Chacaltana, J. Distler, and A. Trimm, “Tinkertoys for the E6 theory,” JHEP 09 (2015) 007, arXiv:1403.4604 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  4. [9]

    Tinkertoys for the twis ted E6 theory,

    O. Chacaltana, J. Distler, and A. Trimm, “Tinkertoys for the twis ted E6 theory,” JHEP 04 (2015) 173, arXiv:1501.00357 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  5. [10]

    Tinkertoys for the Z3-twisted D4 theory,

    O. Chacaltana, J. Distler, and A. Trimm, “Tinkertoys for the Z3-twisted D4 theory,” arXiv:1601.02077 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  6. [11]

    Tinkertoys fo r the E7 theory,

    O. Chacaltana, J. Distler, A. Trimm, and Y. Zhu, “Tinkertoys fo r the E7 theory,” arXiv:1704.07890 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  7. [12]

    Tinkertoys fo r the E8 theory,

    O. Chacaltana, J. Distler, A. Trimm, and Y. Zhu, “Tinkertoys fo r the E8 theory,” arXiv:1802.09626 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  8. [13]

    Nonabelian twists of the D4 theory,

    J. Distler, B. Ergun, and A. Shehper, “Nonabelian twists of the D4 theory,” arXiv:2112.10227 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  9. [14]

    On S-duality of 5D super Yang-Mills on S1,

    Y. Tachikawa, “On S-duality of 5D super Yang-Mills on S1,” JHEP 11 (2011) 123, arXiv:1110.0531 [hep-th] . 19

    2011 arXiv

  10. [15]

    A family of 4 D N = 2 interacting SCFTs from the twisted A2N series,

    O. Chacaltana, J. Distler, and A. Trimm, “A family of 4 D N = 2 interacting SCFTs from the twisted A2N series,” arXiv:1412.8129 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  11. [16]

    Argyres-Douglas theories in class S w ithout irregularity,

    C. Beem and W. Peelaers, “Argyres-Douglas theories in class S w ithout irregularity,” arXiv:2005.12282 [hep-th]

    2005 arXiv

  12. [17]

    N = 2 S-duality revisited,

    M. Buican, Z. Laczko, and T. Nishinaka, “ N = 2 S-duality revisited,” JHEP 09 (2017) 087, arXiv:1706.03797 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  13. [18]

    Gauge theor ies and Macdonald polynomials,

    A. Gadde, L. Rastelli, S. S. Razamat, and W. Yan, “Gauge theor ies and Macdonald polynomials,” Commun. Math. Phys. 319 (2013) 147–193, arXiv:1110.3740 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  14. [19]

    2d TQFT structur e of the superconformal indices with outer-automorphism twists,

    N. Mekareeya, J. Song, and Y. Tachikawa, “2d TQFT structur e of the superconformal indices with outer-automorphism twists,” JHEP 1303 (2013) 171, arXiv:1212.0545 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  15. [20]

    Mirrors of 3D Sicilian theories ,

    F. Benini, Y. Tachikawa, and D. Xie, “Mirrors of 3D Sicilian theories ,” JHEP 09 (2010) 063, arXiv:1007.0992 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  16. [21]

    3d mirr ors of the circle reduction of twisted A2N theories of class S,

    E. Beratto, S. Giacomelli, N. Mekareeya, and M. Sacchi, “3d mirr ors of the circle reduction of twisted A2N theories of class S,” JHEP 09 (2020) 161, arXiv:2007.05019 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  17. [22]

    Higgs branch, Coulomb branch, and Hall-Littlewood index,

    M. J. Kang, C. Lawrie, K.-H. Lee, M. Sacchi, and J. Song, “Higgs branch, Coulomb branch, and Hall-Littlewood index,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 10, (2022) 106021, arXiv:2207.05764 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [23]

    Twisted chiral algebras of class S and mixed Feigin–Frenkel gluing,

    C. Beem and S. Nair, “Twisted chiral algebras of class S and mixed Feigin–Frenkel gluing,” Commun. Math. Phys. 399 no. 1, (2023) 295–366, arXiv:2201.13435 [hep-th]

    2023

  19. [24]

    Infinite chiral symmetry in four dimensions,

    C. Beem, M. Lemos, P. Liendo, W. Peelaers, L. Rastelli, et al. , “Infinite chiral symmetry in four dimensions,” Commun. Math. Phys. 336 no. 3, (2015) 1359–1433, arXiv:1312.5344 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  20. [25]

    Non-simply laced class-S vertex operator algebras,

    G. Elliot, “Non-simply laced class-S vertex operator algebras,” arXiv:2410.00735 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  21. [26]

    Chiral algebras of class S and Moore-Tachikawa symplectic varieties,

    T. Arakawa, “Chiral algebras of class S and Moore-Tachikawa symplectic varieties,” arXiv:1811.01577 [math.RT]

    arXiv

  22. [27]

    Comments on the twiste d punctures of Aeven class S theory,

    Y. Tachikawa, Y. Wang, and G. Zafrir, “Comments on the twiste d punctures of Aeven class S theory,” JHEP 06 (2018) 163, arXiv:1804.09143 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  23. [29]

    Central charges of N = 2 superconformal field theories in four dimensions,

    A. D. Shapere and Y. Tachikawa, “Central charges of N = 2 superconformal field theories in four dimensions,” JHEP 09 (2008) 109, arXiv:0804.1957 [hep-th] . 20

    2008 arXiv

  24. [30]

    Chiral alg ebras of class S,

    C. Beem, W. Peelaers, L. Rastelli, and B. C. van Rees, “Chiral alg ebras of class S,” JHEP 05 (2015) 020, arXiv:1408.6522 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  25. [31]

    Two applications of nilpotent Higgsing in clas s-S,

    J. Distler and G. Elliot, “Two applications of nilpotent Higgsing in clas s-S,” arXiv:2203.05040 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  26. [32]

    Current algebra levels in the E8 theory,

    J. Distler and G. Elliot, “Current algebra levels in the E8 theory,” arXiv:2212.03133 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  27. [33]

    New N = 2 superconformal field theories from S-folds,

    S. Giacomelli, C. Meneghelli, and W. Peelaers, “New N = 2 superconformal field theories from S-folds,” JHEP 01 (2021) 022, arXiv:2007.00647 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  28. [34]

    Fre e field realizations for rank-one SCFTs,

    C. Beem, A. Deb, M. Martone, C. Meneghelli, and L. Rastelli, “Fre e field realizations for rank-one SCFTs,” arXiv:2407.01674 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  29. [35]

    8d gauge anomalies and the topological Green-Schwarz mechanism,

    I. n. Garc ´ ıa-Etxebarria, H. Hayashi, K. Ohmori, Y. Tachikawa, and K. Yonekura, “8d gauge anomalies and the topological Green-Schwarz mechanism,” JHEP 11 (2017) 177, arXiv:1710.04218 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  30. [36]

    Spaltenstein, Classes Unipotentes et Sous-groupes de Borel , vol

    N. Spaltenstein, Classes Unipotentes et Sous-groupes de Borel , vol. 946 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics . Springer, 1982

    1982

  31. [37]

    Unipotent representation s of complex semisimple groups,

    D. Barbasch and D. A. Vogan, Jr., “Unipotent representation s of complex semisimple groups,” Ann. of Math. (2) 121 no. 1, (1985) 41–110

    1985

  32. [40]

    On the notion of metaplectic Barbasch-Vogan duality,

    D. Barbasch, J.-J. Ma, B. Sun, and C.-B. Zhu, “On the notion of metaplectic Barbasch-Vogan duality,” Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN no. 20, (2023) 17822–17852, arXiv:2010.16089 [math.RT]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Paquets d’Arthur des groupes classiq ues complexes,

    C. Mœglin and D. Renard, “Paquets d’Arthur des groupes classiq ues complexes,” in Around Langlands correspondences, vol. 691 of Contemp. Math. , pp. 203–256. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2017. arXiv:1604.07328 [math.RT]

    2017 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Testing our understanding of SCFTs: a catalogu e of rank-2 N = 2 theories in four dimensions,

    M. Martone, “Testing our understanding of SCFTs: a catalogu e of rank-2 N = 2 theories in four dimensions,” JHEP 07 (2022) 123, arXiv:2102.02443 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Compactifications of 5d SCFTs with a twist,

    G. Zafrir, “Compactifications of 5d SCFTs with a twist,” JHEP 01 (2017) 097, arXiv:1605.08337 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  36. [44]

    More on N = 2 S-folds,

    S. Giacomelli, M. Martone, Y. Tachikawa, and G. Zafrir, “More on N = 2 S-folds,” JHEP 01 (2021) 054, arXiv:2010.03943 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  37. [45]

    New rank-2 Argyres-Douglas theor y,

    J. Kaidi and M. Martone, “New rank-2 Argyres-Douglas theor y,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 8, (2021) 085004, arXiv:2104.13929 [hep-th] . 21

    2021 arXiv

  38. [46]

    More on the N = 2 superconformal systems of type Dp(G),

    S. Cecotti, M. Del Zotto, and S. Giacomelli, “More on the N = 2 superconformal systems of type Dp(G),” JHEP 04 (2013) 153, arXiv:1303.3149 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Infinitely many N = 2 SCFT with ADE flavor symmetry,

    S. Cecotti and M. Del Zotto, “Infinitely many N = 2 SCFT with ADE flavor symmetry,” JHEP 01 (2013) 191, arXiv:1210.2886 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Global form of flavor symmetry groups in 4d N = 2 theories of class S,

    L. Bhardwaj, “Global form of flavor symmetry groups in 4d N = 2 theories of class S,” arXiv:2105.08730 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    On low rank 4d N = 2 SCFTs,

    B. Li, D. Xie, and W. Yan, “On low rank 4d N = 2 SCFTs,” JHEP 05 (2023) 132, arXiv:2212.03089 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Argyres-Douglas matter and N = 2 dualities,

    D. Xie and S.-T. Yau, “Argyres-Douglas matter and N = 2 dualities,” arXiv:1701.01123 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    New N = 2 dualities,

    D. Xie and S.-T. Yau, “New N = 2 dualities,” arXiv:1602.03529 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Isomorphisms of 4d N = 2 SCFTs from 6d,

    J. Distler, G. Elliot, M. J. Kang, and C. Lawrie, “Isomorphisms of 4d N = 2 SCFTs from 6d,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 10, (2023) 106005, arXiv:2212.11983 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  45. [53]

    General Argyres-Douglas theory,

    D. Xie, “General Argyres-Douglas theory,” JHEP 01 (2013) 100, arXiv:1204.2270 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  46. [54]

    S-duality of boundary conditions in N = 4 super Yang-Mills theory,

    D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, “S-duality of boundary conditions in N = 4 super Yang-Mills theory,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 13 no. 3, (2009) 721–896, arXiv:0807.3720 [hep-th] . 22

    2009 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.