Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 1 cited by

AC-Augmented Dielectric Barrier Discharge

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An AC-driven third electrode operated out of phase with the primary dielectric barrier discharge raises horizontal electrohydrodynamic thrust by up to about 40 percent, without raising the primary discharge current.

desk verdict Solid experimental paper: an AC-driven third electrode with adjustable phase gives a measured ~40% thrust gain in a DBD actuator, and the main soft spot is only the mechanism story, not the data. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17677 v1 pith:KC3HCYAM submitted 2024-11-26 physics.plasm-ph

Anthony Tang , Alexander Mamishev , Igor Novosselov This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-ph
keywords dielectricbarrierdischargeactuatorelectrohydrodynamicthrustAC-augmentedelectrodethree-electrodegeometryphaseshiftcontrolslidingchargepullmechanismEHDflow
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Conventional two-electrode DBD plasma actuators are limited in the momentum they can inject into air. This paper tests a three-electrode variant in which a second air-exposed electrode downstream is driven by a 2 kHz AC voltage whose phase and amplitude relative to the primary DBD can be varied. The central claim is that when the third electrode runs roughly out of phase, it pulls charged species from the primary discharge downstream and increases measured horizontal thrust by up to about 40%, with the largest measured value being 54.5 mN/m at $V_{DBD}=40$ kV, $V_{ACA}=24$ kV, and a phase shift near $\Phi=150^\circ$. The primary DBD discharge current and power stay essentially unchanged, so the gain is presented as extra momentum injected with the same primary ionization. In-phase operation at high field instead produces reverse discharge and sliding discharge, which can cancel the gain.

What carries the argument

The central object is the three-electrode ACA-DBD geometry: the usual DBD pair (an air-exposed active electrode above a dielectric and an embedded electrode underneath) plus a third air-exposed electrode mounted downstream, driven by a 2 kHz sine wave with independently adjustable amplitude $V_{ACA}$ and phase shift $\Phi$ relative to the active electrode. The mechanism carrying the argument is temporal charge-pull modulation: the ACA electrode's phase-controlled field draws the positive ions created in the primary DBD downstream during the positive-going cycle and draws negative species during the negative-going cycle, augmenting the momentum of the neutral gas while leaving the primary discharge current essentially unchanged. The phase shift is therefore the control variable that decides whether the third electrode adds thrust (out of phase), creates a counter-flowing reverse DBD (in phase), or produces sliding discharge (out of phase at high field).

What would settle it

Phase-resolved imaging of the primary DBD alone versus with the out-of-phase ACA electrode active, at conditions where total primary current is constant, could settle the mechanism: if the streamer length, number, or lateral distribution changes measurably, the claim that the primary discharge is unchanged would fail, and the thrust gain could come partly from a modified primary discharge rather than only from charge pull by the third electrode.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors claim that the horizontal body force of a planar DBD actuator can be increased by placing a third air-exposed electrode downstream and driving it with AC voltage of controllable phase, without increasing the discharge current of the primary DBD pair. In their experiments at 2 kHz, the best out-of-phase settings raised thrust from 31.8 mN/m to 41.8 mN/m at $V_{DBD}=35$ kV, $V_{ACA}=24$ kV, and the largest measured value was 54.5 mN/m at $V_{DBD}=40$ kV, $V_{ACA}=24$ kV, $\Phi=150^\circ$. They attribute this to charge pull: the out-of-phase ACA electrode accelerates positive ions in the positive-going half-cycle and electrons or negative species in the negative-going half-cycle, adding momentum transfer that the two-electrode DBD alone does not provide. The same mechanism explains the failure modes: in-phase operation generates a reverse DBD from the third electrode, and sufficiently high field with out-of-phase operation leads to sliding discharge from the third electrode toward the space charge, both of which reduce horizontal thrust.

Load-bearing premise

The mechanistic conclusion that the added thrust comes from charge pull by the third electrode assumes the primary DBD discharge is not significantly modified when the ACA electrode is turned on; the paper only checks total discharge current and power, so a local redistribution of the primary discharge without a change in total current would be missed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Adding a third AC electrode out of phase can raise horizontal thrust by up to about 40% without increasing primary DBD discharge power, so the same DBD pair can deliver more momentum.
  • The maximum measured thrust, 54.5 mN/m, occurs at $V_{DBD}=40$ kV, $V_{ACA}=24$ kV, and $\Phi=150^\circ$; under these conditions the gain is not from more ionization but from charge pull.
  • At the larger gap $L=25$ mm, out-of-phase operation gives 53.6 mN/m at $V_{DBD}=40$ kV, $V_{ACA}=32$ kV, and $\Phi=180^\circ$, with no sliding discharge, so spacing can be chosen to avoid the loss mechanisms.
  • Multi-stage arrays of DBD-ACA actuators can in principle accumulate these gains, provided downstream electrodes are spaced far enough to avoid the reverse discharge and sliding discharge observed at close spacing.
  • Electromechanical efficiency remains about 0.1% of electrical input, close to the two-electrode baseline, so the augmentation adds thrust without paying a large efficiency penalty.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If charge pull is the mechanism, the gain should scale with the density and lifetime of ions between the electrodes, so varying the primary DBD frequency or gas composition should shift the optimal phase angle and voltage amplitude.
  • The phase-shift dependence suggests the same third electrode could be used as a fast, continuously controllable throttle for DBD thrust, modulating output by phase alone rather than by switching the primary discharge on and off.
  • In-phase operation's reverse discharge implies that practical DBD arrays should alternate phase between successive exposed electrodes rather than driving them in phase, a design rule not stated explicitly in the paper.
  • A testable follow-up would be to measure time-resolved local surface charge on the dielectric under the third electrode to confirm that the out-of-phase gain coincides with increased downstream surface charging.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental study of a three-electrode dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) actuator in which a downstream air-exposed electrode is driven by an AC voltage (VACA) with controllable phase relative to the primary DBD. Direct thrust measurements show that out-of-phase ACA operation increases horizontal EHD thrust by up to ~40% (e.g., from 31.8 to 41.8 mN/m at VDBD=35 kV, VACA=24 kV, L=10 mm), with a maximum of 54.5 mN/m at VDBD=40 kV, VACA=24 kV, Φ=150°. The authors attribute the gain to charge pull by the third electrode, supported by electrical, optical, and velocity measurements; they also report reverse discharge for in-phase operation and sliding discharge for out-of-phase high-field operation.

Significance. The paper's strengths include direct thrust measurements with an analytical balance (three 10-second averages, standard deviation below 1 mN/m), velocity-derived momentum agreeing with direct thrust within about 10%, and time-resolved current recordings at 1 GS/s. The main result—the thrust increase—is robust and reproducible. The mechanistic explanation is plausible and consistent with the data, but the authors acknowledge that they did not directly evaluate species contributions, so the mechanism is an inference rather than a direct measurement. The paper provides useful design guidance for DBD arrays and a benchmark for numerical modeling.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'In-phase operation of the exposed electrodes at high E-field conditions can induce adverse effects and sliding discharge,' but the body of the paper (Section 3.1.1 and Figure 9) shows that sliding discharge occurs at out-of-phase (Φ≈180°) operation, while in-phase (Φ=0°) operation induces reverse discharge; please correct the abstract to match the reported results.
  2. [Section 2.1] Please define VACA explicitly as peak-to-peak or peak amplitude; the Trek amplifier is described as having a ±40 kV peak output, and the reported VACA values (20–32 kV) should be tied to a clear voltage convention.
  3. [Section 3.3.1] The mechanistic statement that 'primary DBD discharge characteristics do not significantly change' is based on total discharge current and power; since the paper later acknowledges that species contributions were not directly evaluated, please add a similar hedge in the abstract and conclusions, or provide spatially-resolved evidence, to distinguish the measured thrust gain from the inferred mechanism.
  4. [Section 3.3.1] The sentence 'In all cases, the two air-exposed electrodes operated in phase with produced lower horizontal thrust decreased due to a counter-forcing reverse DBD' is grammatically garbled and should be rephrased.
  5. [Section 3.3.2] In the efficiency discussion, the sentence 'The overall efficiency at the highest power condition is ~0.1 %, twice as high as reported in the literature' could be misread as a comparison with the baseline DBD in this study; clarify that the comparison is with literature values (e.g., Debien et al. [22]).
  6. [Equation (5)] The integral in Eq. (5) is written with an upper limit of y = ∞, but the control-volume analysis in Section 2.4 uses a finite height (y = 20 mm) where velocity is zero; please make the notation consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: thrust gain is a direct measurement; mechanism interpretation is separately flagged as untested.

full rationale

The central result—up to ~40% thrust increase and a maximum of 54.5 mN/m—is a time-averaged analytical-balance measurement compared with a same-setup two-electrode baseline (Section 3.3.1, Fig. 9), not the output of a fitted model or of a derived relation that presupposes the gain. The velocity-derived momentum from Eq. (4) independently agrees with the directly measured thrust within ~10% (e.g., 52.3 vs 53.1 mN/m for the out-of-phase L=25 mm case), so the force measurement is corroborated rather than reduced to an input. No parameter is fitted to the thrust data and then renamed a prediction, and no equation is asserted identical to another by construction. The mechanistic attribution to 'charge pull' is an interpretation that cites the authors' DCA-DBD work (ref [44]), but the paper explicitly states it 'did not directly evaluate the relative contribution of the positive or negative species to thrust'; the measured thrust increase therefore does not reduce to that citation. The 'primary DBD unchanged' assumption rests on total current and power measurements, which is a possible physical limitation for the mechanism explanation, not a circularity. No self-definitional, fitted-input-called-prediction, uniqueness-imported, ansatz-smuggled, or renaming pattern is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is an experimental characterization; the central thrust claim depends on no fitted free parameters. The analysis rests on standard fluid-mechanics and measurement assumptions (Bernoulli-based pitot calibration, two-dimensional flow, linear near-wall velocity extrapolation) and on domain assumptions about dielectric encapsulation and EMI shielding. No new physical entities are introduced; the charge pull is a mechanism, not an entity.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Bernoulli equation with pitot calibration factor C relates measured pressure to velocity
    Used in Eq. (2) to convert pitot pressure to time-averaged velocity; C is calibrated per tube, standard practice.
  • domain assumption Flow is two-dimensional and spanwise uniform
    Section 2.4 assumes a 2D control volume with unit span; this is violated in L=10 mm high-VACA cases where nonuniform streamers were noted, but direct thrust does not depend on this assumption.
  • domain assumption Linear velocity profile between the wall and y=0.5 mm
    Section 2.4 states a linear no-slip to first measurement point, used in momentum integrals; adds small uncertainty to momentum and velocity-derived thrust.
  • domain assumption Dielectric encapsulation prevents backside discharge on the embedded electrode
    Section 2.1: Kapton and silicone rubber encapsulate the embedded electrode; implicitly supported by the power measurements.
  • domain assumption Balance measurement is free of EMI and electrostatic phantom force
    Section 2.4: a Faraday cage and a non-contact phantom test verified that the balance registers no force without physical contact.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of AC-Augmented Dielectric Barrier Discharge." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KC3HCYAM

@misc{pith2026241117677,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: AC-Augmented Dielectric Barrier Discharge},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KC3HCYAM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17677}
}
read the original abstract

Dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma actuators generate an electrohydrodynamic (EHD) force through the ionization and acceleration of charged species. Most active flow control DBD applications are only practical at lower Reynolds numbers, and increasing the momentum injection can extend the practical uses of the technology. Here, we experimentally demonstrate improvement in the performance of a planar DBD actuator by utilizing an AC-augmented electrical field in a three-electrode geometry. Time-resolved electrical and optical measurements, velocity profiles, and direct thrust measurements were used to characterize the EHD augmentation. Varying phase shift and E-field strength between the two air-exposed DBD electrodes can accelerate EHD flow and increase EHD forcing by up to ~ 40%. At the most favorable conditions, the maximum thrust was 54 mN/m when the air-exposed electrodes were out of phase. In-phase operation of the exposed electrodes at high E-field conditions can induce adverse effects and sliding discharge. Mechanistically, the performance improvements in the AC-augmented DBD actuator primarily come from the additional charge pull action by the third electrode. The insight into the AC-augmented DBD mechanism allows for developing multi-stage arrays capable of further increasing EHD forces.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17677 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Experimental setup. The active and third electrodes are flush-mounted onto quartz dielectric. The embedded electrode is mounted on the back side of the dielectric layer and encapsulated with polyimide and silicone rubber layers. The active and embedded electrodes are connected to a custom power supply, while a Trek 40/15 HV amplifier powers the third electrode. The current is measured with a Pearson 2877 probe and a… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Third electrode positive and negative discharge current at varying phase shift and VACA with L = 10 mm spacing (a) VDBD = 25 kV and (b) VDBD = 40 kV. The positive and negative discharge current is determined similarly to previous works [18]. The standard deviation is determined across at least 10 voltage cycles. Two standard deviation error bars are plotted. The DBD-ACA actuator performance can be optimized by varyi… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Horizontal Thrust at VACA = 20 – 32 kV at 2 kHz with varying Φ with VDBD = 25 kV (a), 30 kV (b), 35 kV (c), and 40 kV (d) at 2 kHz. The distance from the embedded electrode to the third electrode is L = 10 mm. The DBD baseline thrust without a third electrode is a dashed line. At the highest E-filed values, VDBD = 35 kV and 40 kV, VACA > 24 kV, the thrust values dip below baseline at Φ = 150 - 240°. The decrease in … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Thrust at VACA = 20 – 32 kV at 2 kHz with varying phase shift. VDBD = 25 kV (a), 30 kV (b), 35 kV (c), and 40 kV (d). The third electrode gap L = 25 mm. The DBD baseline thrust without a third electrode is a dashed line [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: X-velocity profiles: VDBD = 40 kV, L = 25 mm; VACA = 0 kV, (a) and (b). VACA = 32 kV Φ = 0° (c) and Φ = 180° (d). The profiles are compared at X = 15 mm and X = 55 mm (e), y = 1 mm and y = 2 mm (f) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: X-velocity profiles: VDBD = 40 kV in-phase with VACA = 20 kV (a) and VDBD = 40 kV out-of-phase with VACA = 28 kV (b) with a L = 10 mm third electrode gap. When measuring profiles with Φ = 0° and a L = 10 mm gap, a VACA = 20 kV potential was used because higher potenti…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multi-Electrode Dielectric Barrier Discharge Actuators: Geometrical Optimization of High Power Density Array

    physics.plasm-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A four-stage alternating-phase DBD array with resistor-segmented electrodes reached 251 mN/m thrust and delayed sliding discharge to higher voltages.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Introduction Non-thermal plasma devices have received significant interest in scientific and engineering applications [1, 2]. Plasma discharge has been used in surface disinfection [3, 4], particle charging for two- stage electrostatic precipitators [5, 6], and ionization sources for mass spectrometry applications [7]. Plasma devices can also generate flu...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The three electrodes are identified as the DBD active electrode, the DBD embedded electrode, and the third or AC-augmented electrode

    Experimental Setup and Diagnostics 2.1 AC-Augmented DBD Actuator The schematic of the experimental setup for the AC-augmented (ACA) DBD actuator is shown in Figure 1. The three electrodes are identified as the DBD active electrode, the DBD embedded electrode, and the third or AC-augmented electrode. The discharge is generated with a high-voltage AC signal...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Figure 3 shows the plasma images at varying third electrode phase shifts with a fixed VDBD = 30 kV and 40 kV and VACA = 28 kV

    Results: Plasma and Electrical Characteristics 3.1 Plasma Visualization 3.1.1 Time-Integrated Plasma Visualization The time-integrated plasma discharge visualization as a function of DBD voltage and phase shift in the ACA electrode Φ = 0 - 180° are presented with the smaller gap length, L = 10 mm, to understand the plasma regimes and interaction between t...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Conclusions This is the first report of electromechanical characteristics of an AC-augmented DBD actuator. The three-electrode DBD actuator is characterized using time-integrated and time-resolved plasma visualizations, time-resolved current analysis, thrust measurements, and velocity profiles. The experimental results and the analysis provide insights in...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Professor Alberto Aliseda for allowing the use of the high-speed Vision Research Phantom V12.1 CCD camera and Professor Uri Shumlak for allowing the use of the Specialised Imaging SIL3 UV intensifier. 21

    work page

  6. [6]

    The 2017 Plasma Roadmap: Low temperature plasma science and technology,

    I. Adamovich et al., "The 2017 Plasma Roadmap: Low temperature plasma science and technology," Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 50, no. 32, p. 323001, 2017

    2017

  7. [7]

    Airflow control by non-thermal plasma actuators,

    E. Moreau, "Airflow control by non-thermal plasma actuators," Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 605-636, 2007, doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/40/3/S01

    doi:10.1088/0022-3727/40/3/s01 2007

  8. [8]

    Comparison of direct and indirect effects of non‐thermal atmospheric‐pressure plasma on bacteria,

    G. Fridman et al., "Comparison of direct and indirect effects of non‐thermal atmospheric‐pressure plasma on bacteria," Plasma Processes and Polymers, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 370-375, 2007

    work page 2007

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    Surface Virus Inactivation by Non-Thermal Plasma Flow Reactor,

    A. Tang, A. Ong, N. Beck, J. S. Meschke, and I. V. Novosselov, "Surface Virus Inactivation by Non-Thermal Plasma Flow Reactor," 2023

    2023

  2. [10]

    Behavior of ultrafine particles in electrohydrodynamic flow induced by corona discharge,

    R. S. Vaddi, Y. Guan, and I. Novosselov, "Behavior of ultrafine particles in electrohydrodynamic flow induced by corona discharge," Journal of Aerosol Science, p. 105587, 2020

    2020

  3. [11]

    Electric field and EHD flow in longitudinal wire-to-plate DC and DBD electrostatic precipitators: A numerical study,

    O. Ekin and K. Adamiak, "Electric field and EHD flow in longitudinal wire-to-plate DC and DBD electrostatic precipitators: A numerical study," Journal of Electrostatics, vol. 124, p. 103826, 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    Spectroscopic characterization of a microplasma used as ionization source for ion mobility spectrometry,

    A. Michels, S. Tombrink, W. Vautz, M. Miclea, and J. Franzke, "Spectroscopic characterization of a microplasma used as ionization source for ion mobility spectrometry," Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 1208-1215, 2007

    2007

  5. [13]

    Analytical model for electrohydrodynamic thrust,

    R. S. Vaddi, Y. Guan, A. Mamishev, and I. Novosselov, "Analytical model for electrohydrodynamic thrust," Proceedings of the Royal Society A, vol. 476, no. 2241, p. 20200220, 2020

    2020

  6. [14]

    A laser-microfabricated electrohydrodynamic thruster for centimeter-scale aerial robots,

    H. K. Hari Prasad, R. S. Vaddi, Y. M. Chukewad, E. Dedic, I. Novosselov, and S. B. Fuller, "A laser-microfabricated electrohydrodynamic thruster for centimeter-scale aerial robots," PloS one, vol. 15, no. 4, p. e0231362, 2020

    2020

  7. [15]

    Flight of an aeroplane with solid-state propulsion,

    H. Xu et al., "Flight of an aeroplane with solid-state propulsion," Nature, vol. 563, no. 7732, pp. 532-535, 2018

    2018

  8. [16]

    Performance of decoupled electroaerodynamic thrusters,

    N. Gomez-Vega, H. Xu, J. M. Abel, and S. R. Barrett, "Performance of decoupled electroaerodynamic thrusters," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 118, no. 7, 2021

    2021

  9. [17]

    Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuators for Flow Control *,

    T. C. Corke, C. L. Enloe, and S. P. Wilkinson, "Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuators for Flow Control *," Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 505-529, 2010, doi: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-121108-145550

    2010 doi

  10. [18]

    SDBD plasma enhanced aerodynamics: concepts, optimization and applications,

    T. C. Corke, M. L. Post, and D. M. Orlov, "SDBD plasma enhanced aerodynamics: concepts, optimization and applications," Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 193-217, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2007.06.001

    2007 doi

  11. [19]

    Analytical model of electrohydrodynamic flow in corona discharge,

    Y. Guan, R. S. Vaddi, A. Aliseda, and I. Novosselov, "Analytical model of electrohydrodynamic flow in corona discharge," Physics of Plasmas, vol. 25, no. 8, p. 083507, 2018

    2018

  12. [20]

    Experimental and numerical investigation of electrohydrodynamic flow in a point-to-ring corona discharge,

    Y. Guan, R. S. Vaddi, A. Aliseda, and I. Novosselov, "Experimental and numerical investigation of electrohydrodynamic flow in a point-to-ring corona discharge," Physical Review Fluids, vol. 3, no. 4, p. 043701, 2018

    2018

  13. [21]

    Characteristics of a dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator driven by pulsed-DC high voltage,

    Z. Su, H. Zong, H. Liang, J. Li, and X. Chen, "Characteristics of a dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator driven by pulsed-DC high voltage," Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 55, no. 7, p. 075203, 2021

    2021

  14. [22]

    Plasma actuators for aeronautics applications-State of art review,

    G. Touchard, "Plasma actuators for aeronautics applications-State of art review," International Journal of Plasma Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-25, 2008

    2008

  15. [23]

    Empirical relations for discharge current and momentum injection in dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators,

    A. Tang, R. S. Vaddi, A. Mamishev, and I. V. Novosselov, "Empirical relations for discharge current and momentum injection in dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators," Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 54, no. 24, p. 245204, 2021

    2021

  16. [24]

    Highly time-resolved investigation of the electric wind caused by surface DBD at various ac frequencies,

    N. Benard, P. Noté, M. Caron, and E. Moreau, "Highly time-resolved investigation of the electric wind caused by surface DBD at various ac frequencies," Journal of electrostatics, vol. 88, pp. 41- 48, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.elstat.2017.01.018. 22

    2017 doi

  17. [25]

    Surface dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators,

    E. Moreau et al., "Surface dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators," ERCOFTAC Bulletin, vol. 94, pp. 5-10, 2013

    2013

  18. [26]

    Electrical and mechanical characteristics of surface AC dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators applied to airflow control,

    N. Benard and E. Moreau, "Electrical and mechanical characteristics of surface AC dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators applied to airflow control," Experiments in Fluids, vol. 55, no. 11, p. 1846, 2014

    2014

  19. [27]

    Streamer inhibition for improving force and electric wind produced by DBD actuators,

    A. Debien, N. Benard, and E. Moreau, "Streamer inhibition for improving force and electric wind produced by DBD actuators," Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 45, no. 21, p. 215201, 2012

    2012

  20. [28]

    Microdischarge propagation and expansion in a surface dielectric barrier discharge,

    A. Hoskinson, L. Oksuz, and N. Hershkowitz, "Microdischarge propagation and expansion in a surface dielectric barrier discharge," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 93, no. 22, p. 221501, 2008

    2008

  21. [29]

    Time-dependent volume force produced by a non-thermal plasma actuator from experimental velocity field,

    N. Benard, A. Debien, and E. Moreau, "Time-dependent volume force produced by a non-thermal plasma actuator from experimental velocity field," Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 46, no. 24, p. 245201, 2013

    2013

  22. [30]

    Stokes-layer formation under absence of moving parts—A novel oscillatory plasma actuator design for turbulent drag reduction,

    M. T. Hehner, D. Gatti, and J. Kriegseis, "Stokes-layer formation under absence of moving parts—A novel oscillatory plasma actuator design for turbulent drag reduction," Physics of Fluids, vol. 31, no. 5, p. 051701, 2019

    2019

  23. [31]

    Turbulent boundary layer drag reduction using pulsed-dc plasma actuation,

    A. Duong, T. Corke, F. Thomas, and K. Yates, "Turbulent boundary layer drag reduction using pulsed-dc plasma actuation," Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2019

    2019

  24. [32]

    Aerodynamic performance enhancement of a flying wing using nanosecond pulsed DBD plasma actuator,

    M. Han, J. Li, Z. Niu, H. Liang, G. Zhao, and W. Hua, "Aerodynamic performance enhancement of a flying wing using nanosecond pulsed DBD plasma actuator," Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 377-384, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2015.02.006

    2015 doi

  25. [33]

    Lift and drag performances of an axisymmetric airfoil controlled by plasma actuator,

    N. Benard, J. Jolibois, and E. Moreau, "Lift and drag performances of an axisymmetric airfoil controlled by plasma actuator," Journal of Electrostatics, vol. 67, no. 2 3, p. 133, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.elstat.2009.01.008

    2009 doi

  26. [34]

    Experimental investigation of separation bubble control on an iced airfoil using plasma actuator,

    S. G. Pouryoussefi, M. Mirzaei, F. Alinejad, and S. M. Pouryoussefi, "Experimental investigation of separation bubble control on an iced airfoil using plasma actuator," Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 100, pp. 1334-1341, 2016

    2016

  27. [35]

    Modeling, fabrication and plasma actuator coupling of flexible pressure sensors for flow separation detection and control in aeronautical applications,

    L. Francioso, C. De Pascali, E. Pescini, M. De Giorgi, and P. Siciliano, "Modeling, fabrication and plasma actuator coupling of flexible pressure sensors for flow separation detection and control in aeronautical applications," Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 49, no...

    2016

  28. [36]

    First takeoff of a flying microrobot with no moving parts,

    D. S. Drew and K. S. Pister, "First takeoff of a flying microrobot with no moving parts," in Manipulation, Automation and Robotics at Small Scales (MARSS), 2017 International Conference on, 2017: IEEE, pp. 1-5

    2017

  29. [37]

    Analytical model for electrohydrodynamic thrust,

    R. S. Vaddi, Y. Guan, A. Mamishev, and I. Novosselov, "Analytical model for electrohydrodynamic thrust," Proceedings A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 476, no. 2241, 2020

    2020

  30. [38]

    Plasma actuator application on a full-scale aircraft tail,

    D. Keisar, D. Hasin, and D. Greenblatt, "Plasma actuator application on a full-scale aircraft tail," AIAA Journal, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 616-627, 2019

    2019

  31. [39]

    Comparison of the linear and spanwise-segmented DBD plasma actuators on flow control around a NACA0015 airfoil,

    H. Akbıyık, H. Yavuz, and Y. E. Akansu, "Comparison of the linear and spanwise-segmented DBD plasma actuators on flow control around a NACA0015 airfoil," IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 2913-2921, 2017

    2017

  32. [40]

    Optimization of Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuators for Active Aerodynamic Flow Control,

    F. O. Thomas, T. C. Corke, M. Iqbal, A. Kozlov, and D. Schatzman, "Optimization of Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuators for Active Aerodynamic Flow Control," AIAA Journal, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 2169-2178, 2009, doi: 10.2514/1.41588

    2009 doi

  33. [41]

    One-equation modeling and validation of dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator thrust,

    J.-S. Yoon and J.-H. Han, "One-equation modeling and validation of dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator thrust," Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 47, no. 40, p. 405202, 2014

    2014

  34. [42]

    Differences between dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators with cylindrical and rectangular exposed electrodes,

    A. R. Hoskinson and N. Hershkowitz, "Differences between dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators with cylindrical and rectangular exposed electrodes," Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 43, no. 6, p. 065205, 2010, doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/43/6/065205. 23

    2010 doi

  35. [43]

    Mechanisms and responses of a single dielectric barrier plasma actuator: plasma morphology,

    C. L. Enloe, T. E. McLaughlin, R. D. VanDyken, K. D. Kachner, E. J. Jumper, and T. C. Corke, "Mechanisms and responses of a single dielectric barrier plasma actuator: plasma morphology," AIAA Journal, vol. 42, no. 3, p. 589, 2004, doi: 10.2514/1.2305

    2004 doi

  36. [44]

    Role of the electric waveform supplying a dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator,

    N. Benard and E. Moreau, "Role of the electric waveform supplying a dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 100, no. 19, p. 193503, 2012

    2012

  37. [45]

    Dynamic evolution of vortex structures induced by tri- electrode plasma actuator,

    B.-R. Zheng, M. Xue, and C. Ge, "Dynamic evolution of vortex structures induced by tri- electrode plasma actuator," Chinese physics B, vol. 29, no. 2, p. 24704, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1674- 1056/ab671f

    2020 doi

  38. [46]

    Experimental investigation of influence of sliding discharge DBD plasma on low-speed boundary layer,

    K. Chen, X. Geng, Z. Shi, K. Cheng, and H. Cui, "Experimental investigation of influence of sliding discharge DBD plasma on low-speed boundary layer," AIP advances, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 35108-035108-9, 2020, doi: 10.1063/1.5134848

    2020 doi

  39. [47]

    Electric wind produced by surface plasma actuators: a new dielectric barrier discharge based on a three-electrode geometry,

    E. Moreau, R. Sosa, and G. Artana, "Electric wind produced by surface plasma actuators: a new dielectric barrier discharge based on a three-electrode geometry," Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 41, no. 11, p. 115204, 2008

    2008

  40. [48]

    Electric wind produced by sliding discharges,

    A. Debien, N. Benard, and E. Moreau, "Electric wind produced by sliding discharges," Proceeding of 2nd ISNPEDADM new electrical technologies for environment, Nouméa, 2011

    2011

  41. [49]

    DC-Augmented Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DCA-DBD),

    A. Tang, A. Aliseda, A. Mamishev, and I. Novosselov, "DC-Augmented Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DCA-DBD)," arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.18064, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Optimization of a dielectric barrier discharge actuator by stationary and non-stationary measurements of the induced flow velocity: application to airflow control,

    M. Forte, J. Jolibois, J. Pons, E. Moreau, G. Touchard, and M. Cazalens, "Optimization of a dielectric barrier discharge actuator by stationary and non-stationary measurements of the induced flow velocity: application to airflow control," Experiments in Fluids, vol. 43, no. 6,...

    2007 doi

  43. [51]

    A large-scale multiple dielectric barrier discharge actuator based on an innovative three-electrode design,

    N. Benard, A. Mizuno, and E. Moreau, "A large-scale multiple dielectric barrier discharge actuator based on an innovative three-electrode design," Journal of physics. D, Applied physics, vol. 42, no. 23, p. 235204, 2009, doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/42/23/235204

    2009 doi

  44. [52]

    Successively accelerated ionic wind with integrated dielectric-barrier-discharge plasma actuator for low-voltage operation,

    S. Sato, H. Furukawa, A. Komuro, M. Takahashi, and N. Ohnishi, "Successively accelerated ionic wind with integrated dielectric-barrier-discharge plasma actuator for low-voltage operation," Scientific reports, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-11, 2019

    2019

  45. [53]

    Surface dielectric barrier discharge: Effect of encapsulation of the grounded electrode on the electromechanical characteristics of the plasma actuator,

    J.-C. Laurentie, J. Jolibois, and E. Moreau, "Surface dielectric barrier discharge: Effect of encapsulation of the grounded electrode on the electromechanical characteristics of the plasma actuator," Journal of Electrostatics, vol. 67, no. 2-3, pp. 93-98, 2009

    2009

  46. [54]

    D. M. Orlov, Modelling and simulation of single dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators. 2006

    2006

  47. [55]

    Single dielectric barrier discharge plasma enhanced aerodynamics: physics, modeling and applications,

    T. C. Corke, M. L. Post, and D. M. Orlov, "Single dielectric barrier discharge plasma enhanced aerodynamics: physics, modeling and applications," Experiments in Fluids, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 1- 26, 2009

    2009

  48. [56]

    Temporal evolution of a surface dielectric barrier discharge for different groups of plasma microdischarges,

    I. Biganzoli, R. Barni, and C. Riccardi, "Temporal evolution of a surface dielectric barrier discharge for different groups of plasma microdischarges," Journal of physics. D, Applied physics, vol. 46, no. 2, p. 025201, 2013, doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/46/2/025201

    2013 doi

  49. [57]

    Capacitance and power consumption quantification of dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma actuators,

    J. Kriegseis, B. Möller, S. Grundmann, and C. Tropea, "Capacitance and power consumption quantification of dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma actuators," Journal of Electrostatics, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 302-312, 2011

    2011

  50. [58]

    Spatio-temporally resolved spectroscopic diagnostics of the barrier discharge in air at atmospheric pressure,

    K. Kozlov, H. Wagner, R. Brandenburg, and P. Michel, "Spatio-temporally resolved spectroscopic diagnostics of the barrier discharge in air at atmospheric pressure," Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 34, no. 21, p. 3164, 2001

    2001

  51. [59]

    Measurement of reactive species generated by dielectric barrier discharge in direct contact with water in different atmospheres,

    V. V. Kovačević, B. P. Dojčinović, M. Jović, G. M. Roglić, B. M. Obradović, and M. M. Kuraica, "Measurement of reactive species generated by dielectric barrier discharge in direct contact with water in different atmospheres," Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 50, no....

    2017

  52. [60]

    Experiments on Pitot-tubes in shear flow,

    F. MacMillan, "Experiments on Pitot-tubes in shear flow," 1956. 24

    1956

  53. [61]

    Electric wind induced by sliding discharge in air at atmospheric pressure,

    E. Moreau, C. Louste, and G. Touchard, "Electric wind induced by sliding discharge in air at atmospheric pressure," Journal of Electrostatics, vol. 66, no. 1-2, pp. 107-114, 2008

    2008

  54. [62]

    The influence of residual charge on surface discharge propagation,

    J. Deng, S. Matsuoka, A. Kumada, and K. Hidaka, "The influence of residual charge on surface discharge propagation," Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 43, no. 49, p. 495203, 2010

    2010

  55. [63]

    Surface Potential and Longitudinal Electric Field Measurements in the Aerodynamic Plasma Actuator,

    C. L. Enloe, G. I. Font, T. E. McLaughlin, and D. M. Orlov, "Surface Potential and Longitudinal Electric Field Measurements in the Aerodynamic Plasma Actuator," AIAA Journal, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 2730-2740, 2008, doi: 10.2514/1.33973

    2008 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.