Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 41 references

Wave scattering at a rectangular junction of four waveguides

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that wave scattering at a rectangular four-waveguide junction is recovered exactly from four quadrant problems, produced by splitting the domain with Neumann and Dirichlet mirror conditions, each solved by…

desk verdict Useful new geometry for mode-matching, but the Appendix C reconstruction contradicts the paper's own symmetry and needs correction before the results can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17954 v1 pith:3KEVJHNO submitted 2024-11-27 math-ph math.MP

Afnan A. Aldosri , Michael H. Meylan , Ben Wilks This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MP MSC 35J0535P2578A50
keywords four-waveguidejunctioneigenfunctionmatchingsymmetrydecompositionscatteringmatrixtime-domainHelmholtzequationNeumann-Dirichletquadrantproblemswavepropagation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper solves a two-dimensional linear-wave scattering problem at a rectangular junction where four waveguides meet, with sound-hard (zero normal derivative) boundaries and an incident plane wave from one arm. It shows that the full solution is recovered from four quadrant problems, each carrying a different combination of Neumann and Dirichlet artificial conditions along the two mirror lines. Each quadrant is solved by eigenfunction matching, expanding the field in channel eigenfunctions and matching value and normal derivative across the interfaces. From these quadrant solutions the authors assemble a scattering matrix for all four ports and construct time-domain pulses as quadrature superpositions of frequency-domain fields. The central claim, read sympathetically, is that this symmetry-plus-matching construction yields converged coefficients that satisfy energy conservation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the reflection-symmetry decomposition of the rectangular junction into four quadrants, combined with the eigenfunction matching method. Each quadrant problem is solved on three rectangles by separation of variables, and matching the expansions across the two interior interfaces produces a linear system of algebraic equations for the mode amplitudes. A named piece is the scattering matrix S (equation 46) with its even and odd blocks; the reconstruction identities (11)-(12) are what convert quadrant solutions back to the physical field.

What would settle it

Compute the normal derivative of the reconstructed Neumann-Neumann solution on the rigid-wall segment y in (a1,b1) at x=-b2 from the coefficients obtained by (39)-(44); if that derivative is not zero to within the truncation error, the implicit zero-extension of the Omega_1 field is not supplying the boundary condition stated in (14a).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Helmholtz solution on the full four-waveguide domain need not be computed directly. The two mirror symmetries of the junction split the problem into four quadrant problems: Neumann-Neumann, Dirichlet-Dirichlet, Neumann-Dirichlet, and Dirichlet-Neumann, named for the artificial boundary conditions imposed on the coordinate axes. Each quadrant field is written piecewise in three rectangular subregions, expanded in cosine or sine eigenfunctions with complex propagation constants, and the unknown mode amplitudes are fixed by matching the field and its normal derivative at the two interior interfaces x=-b2 and y=b1. Formulas (11) and (12) recombine the quadrant solutions into the full-domain field for even and odd incident waves. The paper packages the outcome as an 8-by-8 block scattering matrix with even and odd modes separated and symmetry-enforced zero blocks, and illustrates time-domain pulses obtained by summing frequency-domain solutions.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes that, at each interface, matching the normal derivative over the open part (with the field implicitly zero over the rigid wall) is enough to enforce the true boundary condition; this implicit zero-extension is never stated and every computed coefficient depends on it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 8-by-8 scattering matrix, with even and odd modes in separate blocks, gives outgoing amplitudes for any incident mode combination and can drive multiple-scattering simulations of a lattice of junctions.
  • Once the frequency-domain field matrix is computed for a given geometry, time-domain responses for many different incident spectra cost only one matrix multiplication per time step.
  • Because the reconstruction formulas and the matching systems are written for general a1, a2, b1, b2, the method covers junctions with unequal channel and rectangle widths, not only the symmetric case used for the scattering matrix.
  • The numerical results at N=100 satisfy the conservation-of-energy identities (45), which is the paper's internal check that truncation has converged.
  • A junction of this type can be embedded in a square lattice whose band structure could be studied through the junction scattering matrix, connecting to quantum-graph-inspired metamaterial design.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • For equal waveguide widths (a1=a2), the even and odd block sizes of S differ by at most one propagating mode, which may produce near-zero reflection zeros at specific frequencies; plotting reflection coefficients against k would test this directly.
  • The zero-extension subtlety in the derivative matching suggests that a direct finite-element comparison at one or two parameter sets would provide an independent numerical check beyond the paper's internal matching plots.
  • The wide-spacing approximation invoked for the scattering matrix ignores evanescent coupling between nearby junctions; at lattice spacings comparable to the junction size, a transfer-matrix or full-domain calculation would be needed instead of S alone.
  • The same quadrant decomposition could be applied to junctions with higher rotational symmetry, but the artificial boundaries would become wedges whose corner singularities require the matching basis to be enriched beyond simple cosine and sine modes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper considers two-dimensional linear wave scattering at a junction of four rectangular waveguides with Neumann walls. The authors split the problem into four quadrant subproblems using reflection symmetry, solve each subproblem by eigenfunction matching, and reconstruct the full field from the quadrant solutions. They also construct an 8×8 block scattering matrix for the junction and compute time-domain pulses as superpositions of frequency-domain solutions. The central claims are that the full-region solution is recovered from the subproblems and that a scattering matrix for the junction is presented.

Significance. If correct, the paper would supply a useful semi-analytic benchmark for multi-mode scattering at a four-waveguide junction and a building block for lattice-type multiple-scattering studies. The strengths are that no physical parameters are fitted, the quadrant matching framework is standard, an energy-conservation identity is checked for the Neumann-Neumann case, and the time-domain evaluation is reduced to matrix multiplication. However, the current manuscript contains load-bearing internal inconsistencies: the reconstructed right-arm field in Appendix C does not follow from the paper's own reconstruction formula (11), and the derivative matching derivation in Section 3 hides an essential zero-extension assumption. These issues must be corrected before the central claim can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Appendix C] The right-arm formula for the symmetric case is internally inconsistent. For x≥b2, Eq. (11) reconstructs the field as (φNN(−x,y)−φDN(−x,y))/2 for y>0 and (φNN(−x,−y)−φDN(−x,−y))/2 for y<0. Both φNN and φDN in Ω1 have y-dependence cos(β_n y) from Eq. (18), and mirroring gives e^{−iβ_n(−x+b2)} = e^{iβ_n(x−b2)}. Appendix C instead gives ∑ ((A_n^NN−A_n^DN)/2) e^{−iγ̄_n(−x+b2)} sin(γ_n y), whose transverse modes are odd in y and cannot represent an even field. In particular, ∂_yφ_N(x,0) is generically nonzero, violating the symmetry imposed by (11). This directly undermines the abstract's claim that the full-region solution is recovered, and the formula must be corrected to use the proper even modes and wavenumbers.
  2. [§3, Eqs. (41)–(42)] The derivative matching step is not stated correctly. Condition (14a) is piecewise: on (0,a1) the Ω1 derivative equals the Ω2 derivative, while on (a1,b1) the derivative is zero on the rigid wall. Equation (41) instead writes the Ω1 derivative as equal to the Ω2 derivative for all y∈(0,b1), which is not the physical condition. Equation (42) then integrates the left side only over (0,a1), through H_mn, while the right side is integrated over (0,b1); this is a valid weighted-residual formulation only if the Ω1 derivative is implicitly zero-extended over (a1,b1). That zero-extension is never stated. Since all computed coefficients come from this and the analogous systems in Appendix A, the derivation must state the extension explicitly or present the weak form directly.
  3. [§2.3 and Appendix A] The odd-mode expansions are inconsistently indexed. Eq. (26) writes the reflected field as a sum from n=1, while γ_n is defined for n=0,1,2,... and the matching equation (49) sums from n=0. These cannot both be correct. If the n=0 term is truly omitted, the fundamental odd mode sin(πy/(2a1)) is missing from the expansion, which would violate completeness and affect all antisymmetric results. The same inconsistency appears in the scattering-matrix count q̃ in §4, which appears to exclude the lowest odd mode. The indexing must be corrected and made uniform across the definitions, the matching equations, and the scattering matrix.
  4. [§2 and §2.4/§2.5] The naming of the four subproblems is inconsistent. The enumeration in §2 defines Neumann-Dirichlet as Dirichlet at x=0 and Neumann at y=0, and Dirichlet-Neumann as Neumann at x=0 and Dirichlet at y=0. In contrast, §2.4 and §2.5 define ND with Neumann at x=0 and Dirichlet at y=0, and DN with Dirichlet at x=0 and Neumann at y=0. Since Eqs. (11)–(12) and Appendix C rely on which condition holds on y=0, the labels must be harmonized before the reconstruction and the scattering-matrix notation can be unambiguously interpreted.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2, before Eq. (12)] The sentence introducing Eq. (12) says the incident wave is antisymmetric about the line x=0, but both Eq. (12) and Appendix C use antisymmetry about y=0; please correct this.
  2. [§5 and figure captions] The quadrature parameters Nk and Δk used in the time-domain computations for Figures 5–8 are not reported, so the time-domain visualisations are not reproducible as written.
  3. [Figure 8 caption] The caption of Figure 8 is garbled: it reads "b1 = 4, b2 = a2 = 3, a2" with a duplicated a2; please correct the parameter list.
  4. [Throughout] There are numerous typographical errors, including "donated" for "denoted", "team" for "term", "donate" for "denote", and "probl em" in the abstract; a careful copyedit is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the quadrant eigenfunction matching derivation is self-contained, and the central scattering claim does not reduce to its inputs.

full rationale

The paper's core derivation is a direct eigenfunction-matching solution of four quadrant Helmholtz problems with imposed symmetry boundary conditions. No physical parameter is fitted to data, and no target scattering coefficient is assumed in the construction. The full-domain recovery in Eqs. (11) and (12) is an algebraic superposition of the quadrant solutions forced by the stated reflection symmetries, not a fitted or self-defined quantity. The scattering matrix in Section 4 is read off the already computed reflected and transmitted mode coefficients, so it is a post-processing of the solution rather than an input. The time-domain quadrature cites the authors' prior work [39-41] for representing the superposition as matrix multiplication, but this is standard quadrature (47)-(48) and is not load-bearing for the frequency-domain scattering claim. The choice N=100 is justified by requiring the matching conditions and energy identity (45) to hold to linewidth; this is a self-consistency check rather than independent validation, but it is not circular because the coefficients are solved from the matching equations, not defined by the energy identity. I also note a non-circular correctness concern: in Appendix C the right-arm reconstruction for the symmetric case is written with odd sine modes sin(γ_n y), γ_n=(2n+1)π/(2a1), which contradicts the even symmetry required by Eq. (11) and would give nonzero ∂_y φ at y=0. This is an internal inconsistency in the reconstruction formula, but it is a bug or modeling slip, not a reduction of the derivation to its own inputs, so it does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation uses standard eigenfunction expansions and symmetry; no physical constants are fitted and no new entities are postulated. The main bookkeeping items are the numerical truncation and quadrature choices, plus implicit modeling assumptions in the matching and reconstruction steps.

free parameters (2)
  • truncation order N = 100
    Chosen so that matching conditions are satisfied to linewidth and the energy identity holds; no convergence study or error estimate is provided (Sec. 3, Fig. 4).
  • time-domain quadrature parameters (Nk, Delta k) = not reported
    The trapezoidal rule (47) requires a cutoff Nk*Delta k and spacing Delta k; neither is stated in Sec. 5, and no convergence check for the pulse reconstruction is given. The time-domain snapshots depend on these choices.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Separation-of-variables eigenfunctions are complete in each rectangular subregion and satisfy orthogonality over their intervals.
    Used throughout Secs. 2.1-2.5 to expand the solution and form the matching systems.
  • domain assumption Only outgoing waves are present at infinity in each semi-infinite arm, with the single specified incident wave.
    The reflected and transmitted ansatze in (18), (22), (26), and (30) impose radiation conditions at infinity; no incoming waves from other arms are included except through the symmetry reconstruction.
  • standard math The symmetry decomposition (11)-(12) exactly reconstructs the left-only incidence from the four quadrant problems.
    Stated in Sec. 2 without full derivation; standard even and odd decomposition but load-bearing for the full solution.
  • ad hoc to paper In the derivative matching step, the Omega_1 solution is implicitly zero-extended on the rigid wall segment y in (a1,b1) when projecting onto the Omega_2 modes.
    Equation (41) does not show the zero segment, while (42) integrates H_mn over (0,a1); this implicit piecewise definition is required for the matching to be correct.
  • domain assumption Wide-spacing approximation: only propagating modes are kept in the scattering matrix, neglecting evanescent coupling between distant junctions.
    Stated in Sec. 4 before constructing S; relevant for future lattice use, not for the single-junction solution.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Wave scattering at a rectangular junction of four waveguides." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3KEVJHNO

@misc{pith2026241117954,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Wave scattering at a rectangular junction of four waveguides},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3KEVJHNO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17954}
}
read the original abstract

We consider the scattering of linear waves in two dimensions by a rectangular region at the junction of four waveguides. A solution to the frequency domain problem is obtained by exploiting reflective symmetry to reduce the full problem to sub-problems defined on one quadrant of the junction. These sub-problems are solved using the eigenfunction matching method. The solution to the problem on the full region is then recovered from the solutions to the sub-problems, and a scattering matrix for the junction is presented. Finally, the solution in the time domain is constructed as a superposition of the frequency domain solutions and visualised for a range of incident pulses and waveguide geometries.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17954 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic of a lattice of four-waveguide junction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The horizontal waveguides each have constant width [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The waveguide geometry illustrates the incident w [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Waveguide geometries showing the boundary condit N [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Contour plots of the real parts of (a) φ NN , (b) φ DD, (c) φ N D, and (d) φ DN for the cases where a1 = a2 = 3, b1 = b2 = 5, k = 5, and N = 100. The incident mode is p = 2 in panels (a) and (c), and p = 1 in panels (b) and (d). Note that contour lines being parallel o…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Snapshots showing the scattering of a symmetric in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Snapshots showing the scattering of a symmetric in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Snapshots showing the scattering of an antisymmet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Showing the scattering of an antisymmetric incide [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    K. F. Riley, M. P . Hobson, and S. J. Bence. Mathematical methods for physics and engineering: A compre hensive guide. Cambridge University Press, 3 edition, 2006

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    C. C. Mei, M. A. Stiassnie, and D. K.-P . Y ue. Theory and Applications of Ocean Surface W aves: Part 1: Line ar Aspects. World Scientific, 2005

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    C.J. Chapman. Sound and structural vibration: Radiatio n, transmission and response. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 312:360–361, 2008

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    M. L. Munjal. M. L. Munjal - Acoustics of Ducts and Mufflers With Applicatio n to Exhaust and V entilation System Design. John Wiley and Son, 1987

    work page 1987

  5. [5]

    ul Hassan, M

    M. ul Hassan, M. H. Meylan, and M. Naz. Symmetry, validati on, and scattering matrices for time–domain scattering in waveguides. Applied Mathematical Modelling , 60:370–383, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    J. B. Lawrie. Analytic mode-matching for acoustic scatt ering in three dimensional waveguides with flexible walls: Application to a triangular duct. W ave Motion, 50:542–557, 2013

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Girier, M

    L. Girier, M. Roger, H. Bériot, A. Lafitte, and H. Posson. A two-dimensional model of sound transmission through curved and staggered OGV: Effect of inter-vane chan nel mode transitions. In 25th AIAA/CEAS Aeroa- coustics Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 5 201 9

    work page

  8. [8]

    J. B. Lawrie and R. Kirby. Mode-matching without root-fin ding: Application to a dissipative silencer. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 119(4):2050–2061, 2006. 21

    work page 2006

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    M. H. Meylan, L. G. Bennetts, and M. A. Peter. Water-wave s cattering and energy dissipation by a floating porous elastic plate in three dimensions. W ave Motion, 70:240–250, 2017

    2017

  2. [10]

    ul Hassan, M

    M. ul Hassan, M. H. Meylan, and M. A. Peter. Water-wave sc attering by submerged elastic plates. The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics , 62:321–344, 2009

    2009

  3. [11]

    R. A. Dalrymple and P .A. Martin. Water waves incident on an infinitely long rectangular inlet. Applied Ocean Research, 18:1–11, 1996

    1996

  4. [12]

    Hame¸ s and I

    Y . Hame¸ s and I. H. Tayyar. Plane wave diffraction by die lectric-loaded thick-walled parallel-plate impedance waveguide. Progress in Electromagnetics Research, 44:143–167, 2004

    2004

  5. [13]

    Roger, B

    M. Roger, B. François, and S. Moreau. Cascade trailing- edge noise modeling using a mode-matching technique and the edge-dipole theory. Journal of Sound and Vibration , 382:310–327, 2016

    2016

  6. [14]

    Afsar, G

    H. Afsar, G. Peiwei, M. Aldandani, Y . Akbar, and M. M. Ala m. Analyzing the acoustic wave propagation characteristics in discontinuous bifurcated waveguide. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 172, 2023

    2023

  7. [15]

    Afsar and Y

    H. Afsar and Y . Akbar. Energy distribution of bifurcated waveguide structure with planar and non-planar surfaces. Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids , 28:1155–1169, 2023

    2023

  8. [16]

    Afsar, G

    H. Afsar, G. Peiwei, T. Nawaz, and M. M. Alam. Modeling of silencer by using various porous materials in a trifurcated waveguide structure. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulat ion, 128, 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    ul Hassan, M

    M. ul Hassan, M. H. Meylan, A. Bashir, and M. Sumbul. Mode matching analysis for wave scattering in triple and pentafurcated spaced ducts. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences , 39(11):3043–3057, 2016

    2016

  10. [18]

    ul Hassan

    M. ul Hassan. Wave scattering by soft-hard three spaced waveguide. Applied Mathematical Modelling , 38(17- 18):4528–4537, 2014

    2014

  11. [19]

    ul Hassan and M

    M. ul Hassan and M. Naz. Reflection coefficient of a domina nt mode in a pentafurcated duct. Boundary V alue Problems, 2017, 2017

    2017

  12. [20]

    ul Hassan, M

    M. ul Hassan, M. Naz, and R. Nawaz. Reflected field analysi s of soft-hard pentafurcated waveguide. Advances in Mechanical Engineering , 9(5), 2017

    2017

  13. [21]

    Khalid, S

    A. Khalid, S. Y ounas, I. Khan, R. Manzoor, Rabnawaz, and E. S. M. Sherif. Mode-matching analysis for two- dimensional acoustic wave propagation in a trifurcated lin ed duct. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics , 22(7):1095–1112, 2019

    2019

  14. [22]

    Nawaz, M

    T. Nawaz, M. Afzal, and R. Nawaz. The scattering analysi s of trifurcated waveguide involving structural discon- tinuities. Advances in Mechanical Engineering , 11(7), 2019

    2019

  15. [23]

    S. W . Lee, W .R. Jones, and J.J. Campbell. Convergence ofnumerical solutions of iris-type discontinuity problems. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and T echniques, 19:528–536, 1971

    1971

  16. [24]

    L. Lewin. On the inadequacy of discrete mode-matching t echniques in some waveguide discontinuity problems. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and T echniques, 18:364–369, 1970

    1970

  17. [25]

    Afsar, G

    H. Afsar, G. Peiwei, N. Wu, and M. M. Alam. A study on atten uation patterns of acoustic waves in waveguide structures with flexural boundaries. JVC/Journal of Vibration and Control, 2024

    2024

  18. [26]

    Afzal, R

    M. Afzal, R. Nawaz, M. A yub, and A. Wahab. Acoustic scatt ering in flexible waveguide involving step disconti- nuity. PLoS ONE, 9(8):103807, 2014

    2014

  19. [27]

    Afsar, R

    H. Afsar, R. Nawaz, and A. Y aseen. Scattering through a fl exural trifurcated waveguide by varying the material properties. Physica Scripta, 96, 2021

    2021

  20. [28]

    Bilal and M

    H. Bilal and M. Afzal. On the extension of the mode-match ing procedure for modeling a wave-bearing cavity. Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids , 27:348–367, 2022

    2022

  21. [29]

    J. U. Satti, M. Afzal, and R. Nawaz. Scattering analysis of a partitioned wave-bearing cavity containing different material properties. Physica Scripta, 94(11), 2019

    2019

  22. [30]

    Boral, M

    S. Boral, M. H. Meylan, T. Sahoo, and B. Y . Ni. Time-depen dent flexural gravity wave scattering due to uneven bottom in the paradigm of blocking dynamics. Physics of Fluids , 35, 2023

    2023

  23. [31]

    Afzal, R

    M. Afzal, R. Nawaz, and A. Ullah. Attenuation of dissipa tive device involving coupled wave scattering and change in material properties. Applied Mathematics and Computation , 290:154–163, 2016

    2016

  24. [32]

    Nawaz and J

    R. Nawaz and J. B. Lawrie. Scattering of a fluid-structur e coupled wave at a flanged junction between two flexible waveguides. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 134(3):1939–1949, 2013

    1939

  25. [33]

    Warren, J.B

    D.P . Warren, J.B. Lawrie, and I.M. Mohamed. Acoustic sc attering in waveguides that are discontinuous in geometry and material property. W ave Motion, 36(2):119–142, 2002. 22

    2002

  26. [34]

    M. H. Meylan, M. ul Hassan, and A. Bashir. Extraordinary acoustic transmission, symmetry, blaschke products and resonators. W ave Motion, 74:105–123, 2017

    2017

  27. [35]

    Christie and P

    L. Christie and P . Mondal. Mode matching method for the a nalysis of cascaded discontinuities in a rectangular waveguide. Procedia Computer Science, 93:251–258, 2016

    2016

  28. [36]

    H. Ali, M. ul Hassan, A. Akgül, and A. Saleh Alshomrani. W ave scattering through step down cascading junctions. Mathematics, 11(9), 2023

    2023

  29. [37]

    Lawrie, S

    T. Lawrie, S. Gnutzmann, and G. Tanner. Closed form expr essions for the green’s function of a quantum graph—a scattering approach. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical , 56, 11 2023

    2023

  30. [38]

    Lawrie, G

    T. Lawrie, G. Tanner, and D. Chronopoulos. A quantum gra ph approach to metamaterial design. Scientific Reports, 12, 2022

    2022

  31. [39]

    H Meylan

    M. H Meylan. Time-dependent motion of a floating circula r elastic plate. Fluids, 6, 2021

    2021

  32. [40]

    Meylan, Fabien Montiel, and Sarah Wakes

    Ben Wilks, Michael H. Meylan, Fabien Montiel, and Sarah Wakes. Generalised eigenfunction expansion and singularity expansion methods for canonical time-domain w ave scattering problems. W ave Motion, 132:103421, 2025

    2025

  33. [41]

    Wilks, M

    B. Wilks, M. H. Meylan, F. Montiel, and S. Wakes. General ized eigenfunction expansion and singularity expan- sion methods for two-dimensional acoustic time-domain wav e scattering problems. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Science s, ...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.