On the integration of Manin pairs

David Li-Bland; Eckhard Meinrenken

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 39 references

On the integration of Manin pairs

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Given a $\hat G$-equivariant Manin pair $(E,A)$ with $G$ integrating $A$, there is a unique $\hat G\times\hat G$-equivariant morphism of multiplicative Manin pairs $R:(\mathbb{T}G,\mathbb{T}G)\to(\mathrm{Pair}(E),\mathrm{Pair}(A))$; this…

desk verdict A useful unifying framework with a real but fixable sign error in the main proof; deserves refereeing but not acceptance as-is. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17988 v1 pith:63V4FSAJ submitted 2024-11-27 math.DG

David Li-Bland , Eckhard Meinrenken This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.DG MSC 53D1722A2253D20

keywords ManinpairsCourantalgebroidsLiegroupoidsintegrationPoissonquasi-symplecticDiracstructuresbialgebroids

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's central claim is that a whole family of integration results in Poisson geometry are instances of one construction: given a Manin pair $(E,A)$ — a Courant algebroid $E$ with a Dirac subbundle $A$ — and a Lie groupoid $G\Rightarrow M$ integrating the Lie algebroid $A$, the pair integrates to a distinguished morphism $R$ from the standard Courant algebroid $\mathbb{T}G=TG\oplus T^*G$ to the pair Courant algebroid $E\times E$, provided a jet-groupoid action exists. When $A$ is the cotangent algebroid of a Poisson manifold, this morphism packages the multiplicative symplectic form; when $E$ is exact, it packages the multiplicative 2-form of a quasi-symplectic groupoid; when a complementary Lagrangian $B$ is chosen, it packages the multiplicative Poisson or quasi-Poisson structure. The authors prove this by writing $R$ down explicitly in terms of two maps $\alpha$ and $\beta$, then verifying multiplicativity through Courant-bracket computations. A sympathetic reader should care because it replaces a list of separate classical theorems with a single mechanism and clarifies what happens when the integrating groupoid is not source-simply connected.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the fat groupoid $\hat G=J^1(G)$ of the tangent VB-groupoid $\mathbb{T}G\Rightarrow TM$: its elements are complements to the kernels of source and target, it acts on $A$, and by assumption it acts on the whole Courant algebroid $E$. The argument runs through two dual bundle maps, $\alpha$ from units to units and $\beta$ from cores to cores, whose graphs span $R|_M$; $\hat G\times\hat G$-equivariance then propagates $R$ over all of $G$, while the Courant-bracket computations in Appendix A show the section span is closed under the Dorfman bracket. The jet groupoid is what carries the infinitesimal representation $\nabla_{j^1(\xi)}\zeta=[[\xi,\zeta]]$ into a global action, and the assumption that this action exists is exactly what replaces source-simple connectivity.

What would settle it

Take a $\hat G$-equivariant Manin pair and compute the Dorfman bracket of two sections of the relation $R$ defined by equation (20) over $\mathrm{gr}(t,s)$; if any bracket component leaves $R$, Theorem 3.10 is false. A concrete place to look is a non-source-simply-connected integration such as $G=T^*M/\Lambda$ with a non-Lagrangian period subgroupoid $\Lambda$, where Example 3.7 predicts the required $\hat G$-action does not exist, so the theorem's hypothesis fails exactly when the Lagrangian condition is violated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Let $(E,A)$ be a $\hat G$-equivariant Manin pair over $M$, where $\hat G=J^1(G)$ is the jet groupoid of a Lie groupoid $G\Rightarrow M$ integrating $A$. Theorem 3.10 asserts that the map $\alpha=(a_E,-\mathrm{pr}_{A^*}):E\to TM\oplus A^*$ extends uniquely to a $\hat G\times\hat G$-equivariant morphism of multiplicative Manin pairs $R:(\mathbb{T}G,\mathbb{T}G)\to(\mathrm{Pair}(E),\mathrm{Pair}(A))$ with base map $(t,s):G\to M\times M$. Explicitly, $x\sim R(\zeta',\zeta)$ if and only if $t_{\mathbb{T}G}(x)=\alpha(\zeta')$ and $\beta([l_{\hat g^{-1}}(x)])=\zeta-\mathrm{Ad}_{\hat g^{-1}}\zeta'$, where $\beta=(\iota_A,-a_E^*):A\oplus T^*M\to E$ and $l_{\hat g^{-1}}$ is left translation by any lift. The paper verifies that this relation is a Lagrangian subbundle, a subgroupoid, and closed under the Courant bracket, hence a morphism of CA-groupoids, and that uniqueness follows because any such morphism with prescribed units is determined by its core. This single theorem specializes to integrations of Poisson manifolds, twisted Dirac structures, and (quasi-)Lie bialgebroids, and the formula remains valid for integrations that are not source-simply connected.

Load-bearing premise

The theorem's load-bearing premise is that the jet groupoid $\hat G=J^1(G)$ really acts on the whole Courant algebroid $E$ as Definition 3.4 demands; for source-simply connected $G$ this is automatic, but for other groupoids it is a nontrivial condition that can fail, and without it the relation $R$ has no equivariance to get off the units.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Given a $\hat G$-equivariant Manin pair, the morphism $R$ is the integration of the Manin pair: any complementary Dirac or Lagrangian subbundle $B\subset E$ pulls back under $R$ to a multiplicative (quasi-)Poisson structure on $G$ whose target-source map is a (quasi-)Poisson map.
If $E$ is an exact Courant algebroid, $R$ is automatically exact and is encoded by a multiplicative 2-form $\omega_G$ satisfying $d\omega_G=s^*\eta-t^*\eta$, recovering the integration of $\eta$-twisted Dirac structures to quasi-symplectic groupoids and, when $\eta=0$ and $A\cap TM=0$, symplectic groupoids integrating Poisson manifolds.
Choosing a Lagrangian complement $B\subset E$ to $A$, the preimage $R^{-1}(\mathrm{Pair}(B))$ is the graph of a multiplicative bivector field on $G$; if $B$ is a Dirac structure the bivector is Poisson, giving the classical integration result for Lie bialgebroids without requiring $G$ to be source-simply connected.
A Hamiltonian $G$-space for a $\hat G$-equivariant Manin pair, defined as a $\hat G$-equivariant morphism $L:(\mathbb{T}P,\mathbb{T}P)\to(E,A)$, is automatically a module over $R$: whenever $x\sim R(\zeta',\zeta)$ and $y\sim L\zeta$ with compatible sources, the action satisfies $x\cdot y\sim L\zeta'$, which reproduces known Hamiltonian-space notions for quasi-symplectic groupoids and (quasi-)Poiss

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper, the explicit formula (20) gives a practical integrability test: to integrate a Manin pair, one only needs to construct the $\hat G$-action on $E$, and the relation $R$ is then explicit; this shifts the difficulty from solving for multiplicative forms to checking equivariance.
Beyond the paper, the non-source-simply-connected case suggests that obstructions to integration live in the period groupoid of $A$: Example 3.7 identifies the obstruction with a Lagrangian condition on $\Lambda$, so one can probe integrability by asking whether the canonical representation of $J^1(A)$ integrates through the period group.
Beyond the paper, the Hamiltonian-space formalism of Section 5 suggests a reduction procedure for $\hat G$-equivariant Manin pairs: quotients of Hamiltonian $G$-spaces should remain Hamiltonian spaces for the reduced Manin pair, paralleling quasi-Hamiltonian reduction; the paper does not develop this reduction explicitly.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a good paper that deserves a serious referee, but the proof as printed has a sign error in Appendix A that breaks the main bracket-closure argument. The error is local and fixable — flip a sign in equation (27) and the argument goes through — but as written, Step 8 of Theorem 3.10 is not valid.

What's genuinely new: the explicit formula (20) for the integration morphism, the treatment of non-source-simply-connected groupoids via the \hat G-action, and the Hamiltonian-space interpretation in Section 5. The paper correctly recovers known integration results (Mackenzie–Xu, BCWZ, quasi-Lie bialgebroids) as special cases, and the proof structure is transparent. The discussion of fat groupoids and the K-action in Appendix B is useful and careful.

The soft spots, in order of severity. First, the sign issue. In Appendix A, \phi_0(\zeta) = ((\zeta,\zeta), \alpha(\zeta)) with \alpha = (a_E, -\mathrm{pr}_{A^*}). But equation (27) writes the TG-component as a_E(\zeta) + \sum_i \langle\xi_i,\zeta\rangle dy_i. Since \sum_i \langle\xi_i,\zeta\rangle dy_i = \mathrm{pr}_{A^*}\zeta, this is +\mathrm{pr}_{A^*}\zeta, not -\mathrm{pr}_{A^*}\zeta. So the extended section \phi(\zeta) does not restrict to a section of R over gr0(t,s). The subsequent pairing argument then fails: the derivative terms L_{a(\phi(\zeta))}\langle\phi(\zeta'),\psi(\xi_i)\rangle do not cancel with the printed sign. I checked: flipping the sign in (27) makes the restriction correct and the pairings vanish. So this is a concrete, fixable error, not a conceptual one. But a referee should not let it slide.

Second, Section 3.5 states the infinitesimal version R0 and says "we omit the proof." Since the paper's whole point is to give a geometric proof of the integration theorem, leaving the infinitesimal analogue unproved is a gap. It's a minor gap if the authors can point to the thesis, but they should either include a proof or state it as a known result.

Third, the \hat G-equivariance assumption is genuinely restrictive when G is not source-simply connected. Example 3.7 is honest about this, but readers should know that the advertised extension to non-simply-connected groupoids only works when this extra structure exists. That's a limitation, not a flaw.

Who this is for: Poisson geometers and Lie groupoid people. It's a useful organizing paper. My recommendation: send it to peer review, but insist the authors fix the sign error and either prove or properly cite R0. The main theorem is very likely correct, but the printed proof is not.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a general integration theorem for Manin pairs. Given a Manin pair (E,A) over M, a Lie groupoid G integrating A, and a jet-groupoid action of \hat G=J^1(G) on E satisfying natural compatibility conditions, the authors construct a canonical multiplicative Courant morphism R:(TG,TG) to (Pair(E),Pair(A)) with base map (t,s):G→M×M. The morphism is given explicitly in equation (20). The paper then derives known integration results for Poisson manifolds, twisted Dirac structures, and (quasi-)Lie bialgebroids as special cases, discusses the non-source-simply-connected situation, and develops Hamiltonian spaces and Morita equivalences in this formalism.

Significance. If correct, Theorem 3.10 provides a clean and genuinely unifying framework: it recovers the Mackenzie–Xu, Bursztyn–Crainic–Weinstein–Zhu, and Iglesias-Ponte–Laurent-Gengoux–Xu results from one explicit formula, and it gives a precise statement of the extra equivariance hypothesis needed when G is not source-simply connected. The paper's strengths are its explicit formula (20), the detailed appendix with the bracket computations, and the applications to quasi-symplectic groupoids and Hamiltonian spaces. However, the central proof as printed contains a sign inconsistency in Appendix A that affects the bracket-closure argument, so the main theorem is not fully established in the present version.

major comments (1)

[Appendix A, Eq. (27) and Eq. (19)] There is a sign inconsistency between the definition of α in (19) and the extension φ(ζ) in (27). In (19) the units relation is α(ζ)=(a_E(ζ), -pr_{A^*}ζ), but immediately before (27) the text states pr_{A^*}ζ = Σ_i ⟨ξ_i,ζ⟩dy_i, and then (27) gives the TG-component of φ(ζ) as a_E(ζ)+Σ_i ⟨ξ_i,ζ⟩dy_i, i.e. with a plus sign. Thus φ(ζ) does not restrict to a section of R on gr0(t,s). Consequently, the subsequent computation of [[φ(ζ),φ(ζ')]] does not establish that the bracket lies in R. In the pairing identity for ⟨[[φ(ζ),φ(ζ')]],ψ(ξ_i)⟩, the two derivative terms L_{a(φ(ζ))}⟨φ(ζ'),ψ(ξ_i)⟩ and L_{a(φ(ζ'))}⟨φ(ζ),ψ(ξ_i)⟩ cancel only with the opposite sign in (27); the observation that a(φ(ζ)) is tangent to gr0(t,s) is insufficient because the paired functions are not constant on gr0(t,s). Replacing the '+' in (27) with '−' appears to repair the computation, so this is likely a fixable sign error, but as printed the proof of Step 8 of Theorem 3.10 is incomplete.

minor comments (4)

[Section 3.5] The infinitesimally multiplicative version R0 is stated as a theorem, but the proof is omitted with only a sentence saying it is similar to Theorem 3.10. If R0 is intended as a new result, it needs a proof or a precise reference; if it is only a recap of the first author's thesis, that should be stated explicitly.
[Section 4.3, proof of Proposition 4.3] The proof writes α=(a_E,pr_{A^*}) without the minus sign appearing in (19). The surjectivity conclusion is unaffected, but the notation should be harmonized with the main definition of α.
[Section 4.4, first paragraph] The text reads 'quasi-Lie bialgeboid'; this should be 'quasi-Lie bialgebroid'. Similar typographical inconsistencies between 'bialgebroid' and 'bialgeboid' appear elsewhere.
[Appendix A, proof of Lemma A.2] The notation O(y) is used for sections of two different bundles without specifying that it means terms vanishing at y=0 in the appropriate fiber bundle; a brief clarification would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the integration morphism is constructed from the equivariant Manin pair data and verified directly; known integration theorems are derived as corollaries, not assumed.

full rationale

The central claim (Theorem 3.10) is not fed back as an input. Given a hat-G-equivariant Manin pair (E,A), the paper defines α=(a_E,-pr_{A*}) and β=(ι_A,-a_E*), sets R|M=gr(α)+gr(β), extends by the hat-G x hat-G action, and then verifies the Lagrangian, subgroupoid, Manin-morphism, and bracket-closure properties. Known results such as Mackenzie-Xu, Bursztyn-Crainic-Weinstein-Zhu, and quasi-Lie bialgebroid integrations are presented as consequences of this construction, not assumed in it. Self-citations to [20], [21], and [22] supply background formalism (CA-groupoids, action Courant algebroids) and a historical statement of the source-simply-connected case from the first author's thesis, but the proof of Theorem 3.10 does not rest on those citations; Proposition 3.5 is proved in Appendix B rather than imported. The stated omission in Section 3.5 ('We omit the proof, which is similar to that of Theorem 3.10') and the Appendix A bracket check are completeness or correctness matters—one reviewer even suspects a sign error in eq. (27)—but they do not make the claimed derivation equal to its own hypothesis. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked to force the construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central theorem is a conditional statement: it assumes a \hat G-equivariant Manin pair. Background results from the literature on Courant algebroids, VB-groupoids, and Severa's classification are used as standard tools. No free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)

standard math A Lie algebroid A integrates to a Lie groupoid G, and if integrable, a source-simply connected integration exists.
Used in the introduction and Theorem 3.10 to set up the jet groupoid \hat G = J^1(G); also invoked in Proposition 3.5.
standard math The fat groupoid of the tangent groupoid TG is the jet groupoid J^1(G), with the actions described by Gracia-Saz and Mehta.
Invoked in Section 2.3 and Appendix B; this defines the \hat G-action on TG and on A.
standard math Severa's classification of exact Courant algebroids by closed 3-forms and of exact Courant morphisms by 2-forms.
Used in Section 4.3 to translate the morphism R into a multiplicative 2-form \omega_G satisfying equations (21)-(23).
standard math The representation theory of Lie algebroids and groupoids, including source-simply connected covers of groupoids.
Used in Appendix B, Proposition B.11, to integrate the jet representation to an action of J^1(G) in the source-simply connected case.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the integration of Manin pairs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/63V4FSAJ

@misc{pith2026241117988,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the integration of Manin pairs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/63V4FSAJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17988}
}

abstract

It is a remarkable fact that the integrability of a Poisson manifold to a symplectic groupoid depends only on the integrability of its cotangent Lie algebroid $A$: The source-simply connected Lie groupoid $G\rightrightarrows M$ integrating $A$ automatically acquires a multiplicative symplectic 2-form. More generally, a similar result holds for the integration of Lie bialgebroids to Poisson groupoids, as well as in the `quasi' settings of Dirac structures and quasi-Lie bialgebroids. In this article, we will place these results into a general context of Manin pairs $(\mathbb{E},A)$, thereby obtaining a simple geometric approach to these integration results. We also clarify the case where the groupoid $G$ integrating $A$ is not source-simply connected. Furthermore, we obtain a description of Hamiltonian spaces for Poisson groupoids and quasi-symplectic groupoids within this formalism.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

[1]

Alekseev, H

A. Alekseev, H. Bursztyn, and E. Meinrenken, Pure spinors on Lie groups , Ast´ erisque327 (2009), 131–199

work page 2009
[2]

Alekseev and P

A. Alekseev and P. Xu, Derived brackets and Courant algebroids , Unﬁnished manuscript (2002)

work page 2002
[3]

´Alvarez, Poisson groupoids and moduli spaces of ﬂat bundles over surf aces, Adv

D. ´Alvarez, Poisson groupoids and moduli spaces of ﬂat bundles over surf aces, Adv. Math. 440 (2024), Paper no. 109523

work page 2024
[4]

Bursztyn, G

H. Bursztyn, G. Cavalcanti, and M. Gualtieri, Reduction of Courant algebroids and generalized complex structures, Adv. Math. 211 (2007), no. 2, 726–765

work page 2007
[5]

Bursztyn, M

H. Bursztyn, M. Crainic, A. Weinstein, and C. Zhu, Integration of twisted Dirac brackets , Duke Math. J. 123 (2004), no. 3, 549–607

work page 2004
[6]

Bursztyn, D

H. Bursztyn, D. Iglesias Ponte, and P. Severa, Courant morphisms and moment maps , Math. Res. Lett. 16 (2009), no. 2, 215–232

work page 2009
[7]

Cabrera, M

A. Cabrera, M. Gualtieri, and E. Meinrenken, Dirac geometry of the holonomy ﬁbration , Comm. Math. Phys. 355 (2017), no. 3, 865–904

work page 2017
[8]

Cattaneo, B

A. Cattaneo, B. Dherin, and A. Weinstein, Integration of Lie algebroid comorphisms , Port. Math. 70 (2013), no. 2, 113–144

work page 2013

Show all 39 references

[9]

Coste, P

A. Coste, P. Dazord, and A. Weinstein, Groupo ¨ ıdes symplectiques, Publications du D´ epartement de Math´ ematiques. Nouvelle S´ erie. A, Vol. 2, Publ. D´ ep. Math. Nouvelle S´ er. A, vol. 87, Univ. Claude-Bernard, Lyon, 1987, pp. i–ii, 1–62

1987
[10]

Courant, Dirac manifolds , Trans

T. Courant, Dirac manifolds , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 319 (1990), no. 2, 631–661

1990
[11]

Courant and A

T. Courant and A. Weinstein, Beyond Poisson structures , Action hamiltoniennes de groupes. Troisi` eme th´ eor` eme de Lie (Lyon, 1986), Travaux en Cours, vol. 27, Hermann, Paris, 1988, pp. 39–49

1986
[12]

Crainic, R

M. Crainic, R. Fernandes, and I. Marcut, Lectures on Poisson geometry , Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 217, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, [ 2021] ©2021

2021
[13]

Crainic, M.A

M. Crainic, M.A. Salazar, and I. Struchiner, Multiplicative forms and Spencer operators , Math. Z. 279 (2015), no. 3-4, 939–979

2015
[14]

Gracia-Saz and R

A. Gracia-Saz and R. Mehta, VB -groupoids and representation theory of Lie groupoids , J. Symplectic Geom. 15 (2017), no. 3, 741–783

2017
[15]

Iglesias-Ponte, C

D. Iglesias-Ponte, C. Laurent-Gengoux, and P. Xu, Universal lifting theorem and quasi-Poisson groupoids , J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 14 (2012), no. 3, 681–731

2012
[16]

Iglesias-Ponte and P

D. Iglesias-Ponte and P. Xu, Hamiltonian spaces for Manin pairs over manifolds , Preprint, 2008, https://arxiv.org/pdf/0809.4070

2008 arXiv
[17]

M. V. Karas¨ ev, Analogues of objects of the theory of Lie groups for nonlinea r Poisson brackets , Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 50 (1986), no. 3, 508–538, 638

1986
[18]

Kosmann-Schwarzbach, Quasi-big` ebres de Lie et groupes de Lie quasi-Poisson , C

Y. Kosmann-Schwarzbach, Quasi-big` ebres de Lie et groupes de Lie quasi-Poisson , C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S´ er. I Math.312 (1991), no. 5, 391–394. ON THE INTEGRATION OF MANIN PAIRS 31

1991
[19]

Math., vol

, Jacobian quasi-bialgebras and quasi-Poisson Lie groups , Mathematical aspects of classical ﬁeld theory (Seattle, W A, 1991), Contemp. Math., vol. 132, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1992, pp. 459– 489

1991
[20]

Li-Bland, LA-Courant algebroids and their applications , Ph.D

D. Li-Bland, LA-Courant algebroids and their applications , Ph.D. thesis, 2012

2012
[21]

Li-Bland and E

D. Li-Bland and E. Meinrenken, Courant algebroids and Poisson geometry , International Mathematics Research Notices 11 (2009), 2106–2145

2009
[22]

5, 779–816

, Dirac Lie groups , Asian Journal of Mathematics 18 (2014), no. 5, 779–816

2014
[23]

Li-Bland and P

D. Li-Bland and P. ˇSevera, Quasi-Hamiltonian groupoids and multiplicative Manin pai rs, International Mathematics Research Notices 2011 (2011), 2295–2350

2011
[24]

Z.-J. Liu, A. Weinstein, and P. Xu, Manin triples for Lie bialgebroids , J. Diﬀerential Geom. 45 (1997), no. 3, 547–574

1997
[25]

Mackenzie, General theory of Lie groupoids and Lie algebroids , London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol

K. Mackenzie, General theory of Lie groupoids and Lie algebroids , London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 213, Cambridge University Press, Cambrid ge, 2005

2005
[26]

Mackenzie and P

K. Mackenzie and P. Xu, Lie bialgebroids and Poisson groupoids , Duke Math. J. 73 (1994), no. 2, 415–452

1994
[27]

3, 445–467

, Integration of Lie bialgebroids , Topology 39 (2000), no. 3, 445–467

2000
[28]

Mehta, Q-groupoids and their cohomology , Paciﬁc J

R. Mehta, Q-groupoids and their cohomology , Paciﬁc J. Math. 242 (2009), no. 2, 311–332

2009
[29]

Meinrenken, Lectures on pure spinors and moment maps , Poisson geometry in mathematics and physics, Contemp

E. Meinrenken, Lectures on pure spinors and moment maps , Poisson geometry in mathematics and physics, Contemp. Math., vol. 450, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2008, pp. 199–222

2008
[30]

Meinrenken, Poisson Geometry from a Dirac perspective , Letters in Mathematical Physics 108 (2018), no

E. Meinrenken, Poisson Geometry from a Dirac perspective , Letters in Mathematical Physics 108 (2018), no. 3, 447–498

2018
[31]

, Quotients of double vector bundles and multigraded bundles , J. Geom. Mech. 14 (2022), no. 2, 307–329

2022
[32]

Ortiz, Multiplicative Dirac structures on Lie groups , C

C. Ortiz, Multiplicative Dirac structures on Lie groups , C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 346 (2008), no. 23-24, 1279–1282

2008
[33]

Roytenberg, Quasi-Lie bialgebroids and twisted Poisson manifolds , Lett.Math.Phys

D. Roytenberg, Quasi-Lie bialgebroids and twisted Poisson manifolds , Lett.Math.Phys. 61 (2002), 123–137

2002
[34]

ˇSevera, Letters to Alan Weinstein, 1998-2000 , available at arXiv:1707.00265

P. ˇSevera, Letters to Alan Weinstein, 1998-2000 , available at arXiv:1707.00265

1998 arXiv
[35]

Vysok´ y, Hitchhiker’s guide to Courant algebroid relations , J

J. Vysok´ y, Hitchhiker’s guide to Courant algebroid relations , J. Geom. Phys. 151 (2020), 103635, 33

2020
[36]

Weinstein, Symplectic groupoids and Poisson manifolds , Bull

A. Weinstein, Symplectic groupoids and Poisson manifolds , Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 16 (1987), no. 1, 101–104

1987
[37]

, Coisotropic calculus and Poisson groupoids , J. Math. Soc. Japan 40 (1988), no. 4, 705–727

1988
[38]

Xu, Morita equivalence of Poisson manifolds , Comm

P. Xu, Morita equivalence of Poisson manifolds , Comm. Math. Phys. 142 (1991), no. 3, 493–509

1991
[39]

Diﬀerential Geom

, Momentum maps and Morita equivalence , J. Diﬀerential Geom. 67 (2004), no. 2, 289–333

2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Alekseev, H

A. Alekseev, H. Bursztyn, and E. Meinrenken, Pure spinors on Lie groups , Ast´ erisque327 (2009), 131–199

work page 2009

[2] [2]

Alekseev and P

A. Alekseev and P. Xu, Derived brackets and Courant algebroids , Unﬁnished manuscript (2002)

work page 2002

[3] [3]

´Alvarez, Poisson groupoids and moduli spaces of ﬂat bundles over surf aces, Adv

D. ´Alvarez, Poisson groupoids and moduli spaces of ﬂat bundles over surf aces, Adv. Math. 440 (2024), Paper no. 109523

work page 2024

[4] [4]

Bursztyn, G

H. Bursztyn, G. Cavalcanti, and M. Gualtieri, Reduction of Courant algebroids and generalized complex structures, Adv. Math. 211 (2007), no. 2, 726–765

work page 2007

[5] [5]

Bursztyn, M

H. Bursztyn, M. Crainic, A. Weinstein, and C. Zhu, Integration of twisted Dirac brackets , Duke Math. J. 123 (2004), no. 3, 549–607

work page 2004

[6] [6]

Bursztyn, D

H. Bursztyn, D. Iglesias Ponte, and P. Severa, Courant morphisms and moment maps , Math. Res. Lett. 16 (2009), no. 2, 215–232

work page 2009

[7] [7]

Cabrera, M

A. Cabrera, M. Gualtieri, and E. Meinrenken, Dirac geometry of the holonomy ﬁbration , Comm. Math. Phys. 355 (2017), no. 3, 865–904

work page 2017

[8] [8]

Cattaneo, B

A. Cattaneo, B. Dherin, and A. Weinstein, Integration of Lie algebroid comorphisms , Port. Math. 70 (2013), no. 2, 113–144

work page 2013