Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 31 references

Spectroscopy of the spin waves of a synthetic antiferromagnet grown on a piezoelectric substrate

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A synthetic antiferromagnet grown on a piezoelectric lithium niobate substrate shows spin-wave properties as good as those on standard substrates, opening a route to acousto-magnonic devices.

desk verdict Solid first characterization of SAF spin waves on LiNbO3, with addressable model-dependence in the dispersion extraction and a control-sample gap. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18202 v1 pith:IMN73ASW submitted 2024-11-27 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

G. Y. Thiancourt , S. M. Ngom , N. Bardou , T. Devolder This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords syntheticantiferromagnetlithiumniobatespinwavesacousto-magnonicsferromagneticresonancepropagatingwavespectroscopymagneticdampingdispersionrelation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows that a CoFeB/Ru/CoFeB synthetic antiferromagnet, where two magnetic layers are coupled so their magnetizations point opposite, retains its high-quality magnetic dynamics when grown on a piezoelectric lithium niobate substrate. Using ferromagnetic resonance and propagating spin-wave spectroscopy, the authors measure the acoustic spin-wave branch and extract a Gilbert damping near 0.006, linewidths around 370 MHz at 50 mT, group velocities near 4.4 km/s, and an attenuation length of about 3.6 micrometers. These numbers match values reported for the same stack on standard non-piezoelectric substrates and agree with a two-macrospin model, so the paper argues that this platform is ready for microwave acousto-magnonics beyond single-layer magnets.

What carries the argument

The carrying objects are the acoustic spin-wave branch of the CoFeB/Ru/CoFeB synthetic antiferromagnet and the phase-to-wavevector conversion formula, Eq. 5, that turns two-antenna transmission spectra into a dispersion relation. The SAF provides two eigenmodes, optical (out-of-phase) and acoustic (in-phase), and the acoustic branch is the one that propagates with a V-shaped, frequency-reciprocal dispersion. Equation 5, derived from the antenna response model in the thin-antenna limit, links the phase of the field derivative of the reciprocal transmission to the wavevector k through kr minus a distance-independent correction, plus integer multiples of 2π. That identity is what lets the authors convert measured phase into k and thus extract group velocities and attenuation lengths. The analysis also relies on the demagnetizing factors for dots versus stripes to translate the uniform resonance frequency measured on dots into the stripe value.

What would settle it

Growing a CoFeB/Ru/CoFeB stack on a silicon substrate in the same deposition run and measuring the same two-antenna transmission would test the equivalence claim directly: if the linewidth or attenuation length differs by more than the reported uncertainties, the central claim fails. Likewise, a wavevector-resolved measurement of the attenuation length, for example by varying the antenna distance over a wider range, would show whether the constant-Latt assumption in Eq. 5 hides a real k dependence.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the dynamical spin-wave properties of a synthetic antiferromagnet are essentially unchanged when the stack is deposited on Y-cut LiNbO3, a piezoelectric with a large electromechanical coupling coefficient. The uniform acoustic resonance in 4-micron dots sits at 6.49 GHz at 50 mT with a field-independent linewidth whose damping is about 0.006. The dispersion relation measured on stripes from two-antenna transmission is V-shaped, with a group velocity that rises from 4.4 km/s at 50 mT to about 5.2 km/s near 85 mT and then saturates, consistent with the expected scissors-state behavior of a two-macrospin SAF. From the same data the attenuation length is deduced to be 3.6 micrometers. The paper takes these measurements as evidence that high-quality SAFs can be grown on LiNbO3 and used for acousto-magnonic devices, such as nonreciprocal surface acoustic wave delay lines.

Load-bearing premise

The reported dispersion and velocities assume the spin-wave branch has an exactly linear, reciprocal V-shape with a wavevector-independent attenuation length, and the comparison with standard substrates rests on published values rather than a control sample measured in the same run.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Piezoelectric LiNbO3 can serve as a substrate for SAF magnonic devices without degrading spin-wave quality, removing a major materials obstacle for acousto-magnonics.
  • The measured damping of about 0.006 and attenuation length of 3.6 micrometers imply that acoustic spin waves can carry information across micrometer-scale distances, enough for on-chip magnonic circuits.
  • Group velocities of 4 to 5 km/s match the V-shaped dispersion predicted for SAFs, so the two-macrospin model can be used to design future devices on this platform.
  • This platform enables coupling of spin waves to surface acoustic waves, opening a route to nonreciprocal SAW delay lines and other acousto-magnonic functions that single-layer ferromagnets cannot easily provide.
  • The phase-to-wavevector extraction method works for reciprocal spin waves on SAFs, making it a reusable tool for characterizing other multilayer magnonic waveguides.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the equivalence to standard substrates holds, the immediate next test is direct SAW-SW coupling: a strong magnetoelastic interaction would show nonreciprocal microwave transmission at the frequencies measured here, something the paper does not attempt.
  • The claimed parity with standard substrates rests on literature values for SAFs on silicon; a same-run control sample on a non-piezoelectric substrate would either confirm or weaken the claim more directly.
  • The analysis assumes a strictly linear, reciprocal V-shaped dispersion and a wavevector-independent attenuation length; at wavevectors beyond the measured range, any curvature or k-dependent Latt would alter the extracted group velocities and device design.
  • The 3.6-micrometer attenuation length is comparable to the antenna separations used, so tuning antenna spacing could trade off transmitted signal strength against signal-to-noise, a practical consideration for building functional magnonic devices on this platform.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The authors report VNA-FMR and propagating spin-wave spectroscopy measurements on a CoFeB/Ru/CoFeB synthetic antiferromagnet (SAF) grown on a Y-cut LiNbO3 substrate. They extract the uniform acoustic-mode resonance frequency and linewidth, the acoustic spin-wave dispersion and group velocity, and an attenuation length, and they conclude that the magnetic quality is comparable to SAFs on standard non-piezoelectric substrates and consistent with macrospin theory. The paper proposes the LiNbO3/SAF combination as a platform for microwave acousto-magnonics.

Significance. If the quantitative conclusions hold, this is a useful materials advance: it demonstrates low Gilbert damping (alpha = 0.006 +/- 0.001), narrow FMR linewidths, and spin-wave group velocities near 4.4 km/s in a piezoelectric-substrate platform, with good device-to-device consistency across three antenna separations (standard deviation ~200 m/s). The paper benefits from an independent time-of-flight group-velocity estimate (~4.2 km/s) and from careful field-dependent FMR linewidth analysis. However, the central quantitative claims are supported by a model-dependent phase-to-wavevector conversion and by literature-based rather than same-run control comparisons, so the headline statements need either independent verification or appropriate qualification.

major comments (3)
  1. [IV.B, Eq. (5) and Fig. 4] Equation (5) is derived under the explicit assumption of a reciprocal, strictly V-shaped (linear) dispersion and a wavevector-independent attenuation length (footnote 30). The phase-to-wavevector conversion and the subsequent linear fits in Fig. 4(b) therefore cannot by themselves establish that the dispersion is linear or that vg = 4.422 +/- 0.062 km/s is a model-free measurement; the quoted uncertainty reflects only the fit precision within the assumed model. Because the abstract and Section V use the dispersion and group velocity as primary evidence that the SAF on LiNbO3 is "as good as" standard substrates and "in line with theory," this assumption is load-bearing. I ask the authors to provide an independent check of the linear-dispersion hypothesis, for example a frequency-resolved time-of-flight measurement over a wider bandwidth or a comparison with a model-free inversion of the phase using a more general dispersion ansatz, and to quantify how exchange or dipolar k^2/k^3 corrections and a k-dependent Latt would bias vg and Latt.
  2. [V and Abstract] The comparative claim that the magnetic properties are "as good as when grown on standard non-piezoelectric substrates" is based on literature values for SAFs on silicon (refs. 17 and 25) rather than on a control sample measured in the same run. While the reported FMR linewidth and damping are indicative of good film quality, a same-run control wafer would materially strengthen the comparison. Absent that control, the conclusion should be qualified to "consistent with literature values for standard substrates" rather than presented as a direct equivalence.
  3. [IV.C, Fig. 4(b)] The field dependence of the group velocity is one of the main comparisons with theory, but the data points are obtained from the same model-dependent conversion discussed above. The "semi-quantitative agreement" with the 2-macrospin model would be more convincing if the theoretical curve and the measured vg(Hx) were plotted together with an error band that includes the model-parameter uncertainties (Hj, Ms, and the demagnetizing factors), rather than only the fit uncertainties quoted in the text.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption contains a duplicated "of": "Scanning electron microscopy image of of a PSWS device."
  2. [Throughout] The notation alternates between "LiNbO 3" and "LiNbO3"; please use a consistent formatting.
  3. [Figure captions] The figure-caption style is inconsistent ("Fig 3.(a)" versus "Fig. 3(a)" and "Fig 4.(a)"); please standardize.
  4. [Data Availability] The Data Availability statement says the data are "available within the article from the corresponding author upon reasonable request," which is ambiguous; please clarify whether the data are contained in the article or available on request, and consider providing a repository link.
  5. [III and IV.A] The time-of-flight estimate vg = 4.2 km/s is used as an independent cross-check, but no uncertainty is given for this estimate; please state the estimated uncertainty or at least the width of the observed wavepacket arrival.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Eq. (5) assumes a V-shaped, reciprocal, wavevector-independent-attenuation dispersion, and Fig. 4 then reports the quasi-linear V-shape and group velocities deduced from that same fitted model, so the dispersion shape is partly an output of the assumed model rather than an independent measurement.

  1. ansatz smuggled in via citation [Section IV.B, Eq. (5) and Section IV.C, Fig. 4; formalism from ref. 29]
    "For reciprocal waves with a ∨-shaped dispersion relation, the contribution ˜Syy21 ... can be deduced from the sum of the experimental forward and reverse transmission coefficients (see the section IX.B of ref. 29). ... the experimental data can be linked to the SW wavevector of the acoustic SW branch by: [Eq. 5]. ... The agreement is satisfactory and the dispersion relation can thus be deduced from a fit to Eq. 5. ... For each applied field, the quasi-linear V-shape of the dispersion relation allows to define a characteristic group velocity."

    Equation (5) is derived from a model that explicitly assumes a strictly linear, reciprocal V-shaped dispersion, with vg and f(k=0) entering as fitted parameters when the measured phase is compared to Eq. (5). The paper then states that the dispersion relation is 'deduced from a fit to Eq. 5', meaning the frequency-to-wavevector conversion uses the same linear relation whose slope vg is reported. Reporting the 'quasi-linear V-shape' of Fig. 4(a) and the group velocities obtained from linear fits in Fig. 4(b) is therefore partly the assumed model returned as data rather than a model-free measurement.

full rationale

The central material-quality claim rests on more than the dispersion extraction: the FMR linewidth (370 MHz) and the Gilbert damping α=0.006 come from VNA-FMR without invoking the V-shaped dispersion model, and the impulse-response time-of-flight gives an independent vg≈4.2 km/s, with consistency across three antenna distances. However, the dispersion relation itself, its 'quasi-linear V-shape', and the quoted group velocities are obtained through Eq. (5), whose derivation assumes a V-shaped, reciprocal dispersion and a wavevector-independent attenuation length (footnote 30). Thus the V-shape conclusion is partly an output of the model used to convert phases into wavevectors. This is a genuine partial circularity, but it does not make the whole paper circular because the numerical group velocity is consistent with an independent time-of-flight estimate and the model fit could in principle have failed. The comparison to non-piezoelectric substrates relies on literature values rather than a same-run control sample; that weakens the comparative statement but is not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its central quantitative results, damping, group velocity, and attenuation length, are extracted from data using models that assume a V-shaped dispersion and known material parameters. The main parameters that are not independently measured here are Ms and Hj, which are taken from prior work, and the group velocity and attenuation length, which are derived from the data under a specific model. The method is standard for spin-wave spectroscopy, but the absence of a direct control sample and the model dependence of the extraction are the main sources of uncertainty.

free parameters (5)
  • Interlayer exchange field Hj = ≈100 mT
    Taken as a known value from prior CoFeB/Ru/CoFeB characterization rather than measured in this paper. It enters the acoustic resonance formula Eq. 2 and the damping extraction α = Δω0/(γ0(Ms + Hj)).
  • Magnetization Ms = μ0Ms = 1.7 T
    Assumed from prior material characterization. Used in demagnetizing-factor calculations, Eq. 2, and in the two-macrospin theory comparison for the group velocity.
  • Gilbert damping α = 0.006 ± 0.001
    Extracted from the FMR linewidth using the formula α = Δω0/(γ0(Ms + Hj)). It is a central metric used to support the claim that the SAF quality matches standard substrates.
  • Group velocity vg = 4.422 ± 0.062 km/s at μ0Hx = 50 mT
    Obtained by fitting the phase of ∂S21/∂H to Eq. 5, which assumes a V-shaped dispersion. This fitted value is then reported as the measured group velocity, with a time-of-flight estimate providing partial independent support.
  • Attenuation length Latt = 3.6 μm
    Estimated from the impulse-response group delay and linewidth via Latt = 2vg/Δω0. It is used as a fixed input in Eq. 5, and the model deliberately neglects any wavevector dependence of Latt.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Linearization of the Landau-Lifshitz equations for a two-macrospin SAF model yields Eq. 2 for the acoustic mode frequency and the group-velocity expressions from Ref. 17.
    Used to convert the dot FMR frequencies to the stripe FMR frequencies and to compare the measured group velocities with theory.
  • domain assumption The acoustic spin-wave dispersion is V-shaped (linear in wavevector) and frequency-reciprocal in the field configuration with Hx perpendicular to k.
    Eqs. 3 to 5 assume a V-shaped dispersion and reciprocity; the phase-to-wavevector conversion rests on this assumption.
  • domain assumption The attenuation length Latt is independent of wavevector.
    Stated explicitly in footnote 30 of the paper. This assumption is required for the phase correction term in Eq. 5.
  • domain assumption The Ms and Hj values from prior characterization of CoFeB/Ru/CoFeB stacks remain valid for the film grown on LiNbO3.
    Used in Eq. 2 and in the damping extraction; no in-situ measurement of these values is reported in this paper.
  • standard math Demagnetizing factors for dots and stripes computed from Refs. 23 and 24 are accurate for the patterned geometries.
    Used to correct the dot FMR frequencies to the stripe geometry before comparison with the PSWS data.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spectroscopy of the spin waves of a synthetic antiferromagnet grown on a piezoelectric substrate." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IMN73ASW

@misc{pith2026241118202,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spectroscopy of the spin waves of a synthetic antiferromagnet grown on a piezoelectric substrate},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IMN73ASW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18202}
}
read the original abstract

Efficient coupling between magnons and phonons requires material platforms that contain magnetic multilayers with versatile high-frequency properties grown on piezoelectric substrates with large electromechanical coupling coefficients. One of these systems is the CoFeB/Ru/CoFeB Synthetic antiferromagnet grown on Lithium Niobate substrate. We investigate its microwave magnetic properties using a combination of ferromagnetic resonance and propagating spin wave spectroscopy, from which we extract the dispersion relation of the acoustic branch of spin waves. The frequency and the linewidth of this spin wave resonance, its field dependence and its dispersion relation indicate that the magnetic properties are as good as when grown on standard non-piezoelectric substrates, as well as being in line with theory. This new material platform opens opportunities to extend microwave acousto-magnonics beyond the use of single layer magnets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.18202 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Sketch of the setup of propagating spin wave [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) shows the impulse response s12(t) for a SW propagation distance r = 4.2 µm. The wavepackets of the acoustic SWs reach the second antenna in a travel time of typically tg ≈ 1 ns. This group delay is essen￾tially independent of the applied fields for fields inducing a scissor state28 [see the dashed line in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Propagating Spin Wave Spectroscopy of the acoustic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Dispersion relation of the acoustic spin waves for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Campbell ,\ title Surface acoustic wave devices for mobile and wireless communications, four-volume set , \ \ ( publisher Academic Press ,\ year 1998 ) NoStop

    author author C. Campbell ,\ title Surface acoustic wave devices for mobile and wireless communications, four-volume set , \ \ ( publisher Academic Press ,\ year 1998 ) NoStop

    work page 1998

  2. [2]

    L \"a nge , author B

    author author K. L \"a nge , author B. E. \ Rapp ,\ and\ author M. Rapp ,\ title title Surface acoustic wave biosensors: a review , \ @noop journal journal Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry \ volume 391 ,\ pages 1509--1519 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    author author A. Pohl ,\ title title A review of wireless saw sensors , \ @noop journal journal IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control \ volume 47 ,\ pages 317--332 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    work page 2000

  4. [4]

    author author C. Kittel ,\ title title Interaction of Spin Waves and Ultrasonic Waves in Ferromagnetic Crystals , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.110.836 journal journal Physical Review \ volume 110 ,\ pages 836--841 ( year 1958 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrev.110.836

  5. [5]

    Dreher , author M

    author author L. Dreher , author M. Weiler , author M. Pernpeintner , author H. Huebl , author R. Gross , author M. S. \ Brandt ,\ and\ author S. T. B. \ Goennenwein ,\ title title Surface acoustic wave driven ferromagnetic resonance in nickel thin films: Theory and experiment , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.134415 journal journal Physical Review ...

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.134415

  6. [6]

    Küß , author S

    author author M. Küß , author S. Glamsch , author Y. Kunz , author A. Hörner , author M. Weiler ,\ and\ author M. Albrecht ,\ title title Giant Surface Acoustic Wave Nonreciprocity with Low Magnetoacoustic Insertion Loss in CoFeB / Ru / CoFeB Synthetic Antiferromagnets , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.3c00844 journal journal ACS Applied Electronic Mate...

    work page doi:10.1021/acsaelm.3c00844

  7. [7]

    Küß , author M

    author author M. Küß , author M. Heigl , author L. Flacke , author A. Hörner , author M. Weiler , author A. Wixforth ,\ and\ author M. Albrecht ,\ title title Nonreciprocal Magnetoacoustic Waves in Dipolar - Coupled Ferromagnetic Bilayers , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.034060 journal journal Physical Review Applied \ volume 15 ,\ pages 0340...

    doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.15.034060

  8. [8]

    Küß , author M

    author author M. Küß , author M. Heigl , author L. Flacke , author A. Hefele , author A. Hörner , author M. Weiler , author M. Albrecht ,\ and\ author A. Wixforth ,\ title title Symmetry of the Magnetoelastic Interaction of Rayleigh and Shear Horizontal Magnetoacoustic Waves in Nickel Thin Films on Li Ta O 3 , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.0...

    doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.15.034046

Show all 31 references
  1. [9]

    Huang , author Y

    author author M. Huang , author Y. Liu , author W. Hu , author Y. Wu , author W. Wang , author W. He , author H. Zhang ,\ and\ author F. Bai ,\ title title Large nonreciprocity of shear-horizontal surface acoustic waves induced by a magnetoelastic bilayer , \ https://doi.org/1...

    doi

  2. [10]

    Xu , author K

    author author M. Xu , author K. Yamamoto , author J. Puebla , author K. Baumgaertl , author B. Rana , author K. Miura , author H. Takahashi , author D. Grundler , author S. Maekawa ,\ and\ author Y. Otani ,\ title title Nonreciprocal surface acoustic wave propagation via magne...

    doi

  3. [11]

    Yamamoto , author M

    author author K. Yamamoto , author M. Xu , author J. Puebla , author Y. Otani ,\ and\ author S. Maekawa ,\ title title Interaction between surface acoustic waves and spin waves in a ferromagnetic thin film , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.168672 journal journal Journal ...

  4. [12]

    author author J. H. \ Kwon , author J. Yoon , author P. Deorani , author J. M. \ Lee , author J. Sinha , author K.-J. \ Lee , author M. Hayashi ,\ and\ author H. Yang ,\ title title Giant nonreciprocal emission of spin waves in ta/py bilayers , \ @noop journal journal Science ...

    2016

  5. [13]

    author author R. L. \ Stamps ,\ title title Spin configurations and spin-wave excitations in exchange-coupled bilayers , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.49.339 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 49 ,\ pages 339--347 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    doi

  6. [14]

    author author F. C. \ Nörtemann , author R. L. \ Stamps ,\ and\ author R. E. \ Camley ,\ title title Microscopic calculation of spin waves in antiferromagnetically coupled multilayers: Nonreciprocity and finite-size effects , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.47.11910 journal...

    doi

  7. [15]

    Ishibashi , author Y

    author author M. Ishibashi , author Y. Shiota , author T. Li , author S. Funada , author T. Moriyama ,\ and\ author T. Ono ,\ title title Switchable giant nonreciprocal frequency shift of propagating spin waves in synthetic antiferromagnets , \ https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.a...

    doi

  8. [16]

    Gallardo , author T

    author author R. Gallardo , author T. Schneider , author A. Chaurasiya , author A. Oelschlägel , author S. Arekapudi , author A. Roldán-Molina , author R. Hübner , author K. Lenz , author A. Barman , author J. Fassbender , author J. Lindner , author O. Hellwig ,\ and\ author P...

    doi

  9. [17]

    Millo , author J.-P

    author author F. Millo , author J.-P. \ Adam , author C. Chappert , author J.-V. \ Kim , author A. Mouhoub , author A. Solignac ,\ and\ author T. Devolder ,\ title title Unidirectionality of spin waves in synthetic antiferromagnets , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.20...

    doi

  10. [18]

    Thiancourt , author S

    author author G. Thiancourt , author S. Ngom , author N. Bardou ,\ and\ author T. Devolder ,\ title title Unidirectional spin waves measured using propagating-spin-wave spectroscopy , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review Applied \ volume 22 ,\ pages 034040 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  11. [19]

    Mouhoub , author F

    author author A. Mouhoub , author F. Millo , author C. Chappert , author J.-V. \ Kim , author J. Létang , author A. Solignac ,\ and\ author T. Devolder ,\ title title Exchange energies in CoFeB / Ru / CoFeB synthetic antiferromagnets , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterial...

    doi

  12. [20]

    Bilzer , author T

    author author C. Bilzer , author T. Devolder , author P. Crozat , author C. Chappert , author S. Cardoso ,\ and\ author P. Freitas ,\ title title Vector network analyzer ferromagnetic resonance of thin films on coplanar waveguides: Comparison of different evaluation methods , ...

    2007

  13. [21]

    note The geometry were chosen to reduce the effect of shape anisotropy. Stop

  14. [22]

    Devolder , author S.-M

    author author T. Devolder , author S.-M. \ Ngom , author A. Mouhoub , author J. Letang , author J.-V. \ Kim , author P. Crozat , author J.-P. \ Adam , author A. Solignac ,\ and\ author C. Chappert ,\ title title Measuring a population of spin waves from the electrical noise of...

    doi

  15. [23]

    Beleggia , author M

    author author M. Beleggia , author M. De Graef ,\ and\ author Y. Millev ,\ title title The equivalent ellipsoid of a magnetized body , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics \ volume 39 ,\ pages 891 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006

  16. [24]

    author author A. Aharoni ,\ title title Demagnetizing factors for rectangular ferromagnetic prisms , \ @noop journal journal Journal of applied physics \ volume 83 ,\ pages 3432--3434 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998

  17. [25]

    author author R. L. \ Seeger , author F. Millo , author A. Mouhoub , author G. de Loubens , author A. Solignac ,\ and\ author T. Devolder ,\ title title Inducing or suppressing the anisotropy in multilayers based on CoFeB , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.054409 j...

    doi

  18. [26]

    Wojewoda , author J

    author author O. Wojewoda , author J. Holobrádek , author D. Pavelka , author E. Pribytova , author J. Krčma , author J. Klíma , author J. Michalička , author T. Lednický , author A. V. \ Chumak ,\ and\ author M. Urbánek ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.10044 title Unidirectional ...

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Devolder , author G

    author author T. Devolder , author G. Talmelli , author S. M. \ Ngom , author F. Ciubotaru , author C. Adelmann ,\ and\ author C. Chappert ,\ title title Measuring the dispersion relations of spin wave bands using time-of-flight spectroscopy , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev...

    doi

  20. [28]

    This is indicative to the presence of several SW mode with different group velocities, most probably quantized in the width of the stripe devolder_measuring_2022

    note For applied fields near and above saturation _0H_x 100 mT, the initially single wavepacket of the impulse response progressively splits into several separated wavepackets arriving at different t_g 's. This is indicative to the presence of several SW mode with different gr...

  21. [29]

    author author T. Devolder ,\ title title Propagating-spin-wave spectroscopy using inductive antennas: Conditions for unidirectional energy flow , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.20.054057 journal journal Physical Review Applied \ volume 20 ,\ pages 054057 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi

  22. [30]

    note We neglect any variation of the attenuation length with the wavevector. Stop

  23. [31]

    Verba , author V

    author author R. Verba , author V. Tiberkevich ,\ and\ author A. Slavin ,\ title title Wide-band nonreciprocity of surface acoustic waves induced by magnetoelastic coupling with a synthetic antiferromagnet , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review Applied \ volume 12 ,\ pages ...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.