Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 3 minor 3 cited by

X-ray polarization from accretion disk winds

T0 review · 1 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that single Thomson scattering of central X-ray emission in equatorial accretion disk winds can reproduce the high polarization degrees measured by IXPE in X-ray binaries and active galactic nuclei.

desk verdict Useful wind-scattering model for the IXPE puzzle, but the quantitative matches rest on a single-scattering formula that drops escape attenuation at the very optical depths and inclinations used. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18299 v1 pith:VI4M2KWW submitted 2024-11-27 astro-ph.HE

Anagha P. Nitindala , Alexandra Veledina , Juri Poutanen This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords X-raypolarizationaccretiondiskwindsThomsonscatteringbinariesactivegalacticnucleiIXPEradiativetransferdegree
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the surprisingly high X-ray polarization measured by IXPE in X-ray binaries and active galactic nuclei does not have to come from the inner accretion flow. Instead, a fraction or all of it could arise from single Thomson scattering of the central source's radiation in slow, extended equatorial accretion disk winds, which are already known to be present from spectroscopy. Using a simple analytic model with a Gaussian optical-depth profile and four possible emission patterns for the illuminating source, the authors show that wind scattering can reproduce the polarization degrees and angles observed across hard- and soft-state black-hole binaries, neutron-star low-mass X-ray binaries, X-ray pulsars, and Seyfert 1 galaxies. If right, this reframes X-ray polarimetry as a probe of outflow geometry rather than only of the innermost accretion region.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the single-scattering radiative-transfer solution for a wind, in which the escaping Stokes vector is $L(\mu)=L_\star(\mu)\exp[-\tau(\mu)]+L_1(\mu)$ with $L_1(\mu)$ obtained from the azimuthally averaged Thomson phase matrix $P(\mu;\mu')$ of Eq. (22) and the scattering probability $1-\exp[-\tau(\mu')]$ of Eq. (21). The wind's optical depth is taken to be a Gaussian profile $\tau(\mu)=\tau_0\exp[-\mu^2/(2\mu_w^2)]$ (Eq. 28), where $\mu=\cos i$, $\mu_w=\sin\alpha_w$ for thin winds, and $\tau_0$ is the equatorial optical depth; this profile, together with the angular pattern $a_{\rm inc}(\mu)$ of the illuminating source, fixes the effective optical depth that controls the scattered fraction. Four source models (isotropic, flat blackbody disk, Comptonization in a slab, and electron-scattering-dominated disk) span the range of incident angular distributions and intrinsic polarization. The phase matrix, the Gaussian profile, and the resulting mean interaction angle $\bar\mu$ carry the entire argument: they determine when the scattered polarization is parallel or perpendicular to the disk normal and how the total polarization varies with inclination, opening angle, and optical depth.

What would settle it

Time-resolved X-ray polarimetry of a source like Cyg X-1: if the polarization degree follows the subsecond quasi-periodic oscillations of the flux instead of being smeared out by the light-travel time across an extended wind, the wind origin for the bulk of the polarization is excluded. Alternatively, independent spectroscopic measurements showing that the winds in 4U 1630-472 or NGC 4151 have opening angles and optical depths far from the values the model needs to match their IXPE polarization would falsify the source-specific claims.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that equatorial accretion disk winds, located far from the compact object and already detected spectroscopically, can be the site where much or all of the observed X-ray polarization is produced. For a point-like, azimuthally symmetric central source illuminating a wind with opening angle $\alpha_w$ and equatorial optical depth $\tau_0$, single Thomson scattering produces a polarized scattered component; in the thin-wind limit this component can reach tens of percent polarization for edge-on observers. When the scattered light is combined with the unscattered (and possibly intrinsically polarized) radiation, the total polarization degree as a function of inclination matches the values seen by IXPE: roughly 4% in hard-state black-hole binaries, up to about 8% in the soft-state source 4U 1630-472, a few percent in Seyfert 1 galaxies, and the constant unpulsed component inferred in X-ray pulsars. Because the scattering happens far from the black hole or neutron star, the polarization angle is set by the outer geometry and does not rotate with energy, which is also what the observations show.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes the wind is a smooth, axisymmetric screen with a Gaussian optical-depth profile whose equatorial depth and opening angle are chosen freely for each source, and that each photon scatters only once; if real winds are clumpy, patchy, or thick enough for multiple scattering, the computed polarization levels and angular patterns would change and the source-by-source matches would not survive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The roughly 4% polarization of low-inclination hard-state black-hole binaries like Cyg X-1 and Swift J1727.8-1613 can be produced by wind scattering, removing the need to invoke a misaligned inner disk or an outflowing relativistic corona to explain them.
  • State transitions such as the drop and recovery of polarization in Swift J1727.8-1613 and the decline through the steep power-law state in 4U 1630-472 map naturally onto changes in wind optical depth and opening angle rather than changes in the inner accretion geometry.
  • A constant, pulse-phase-independent polarized component, as inferred for the X-ray pulsars LS V +44 17 and Swift J0243.6+6124, is naturally supplied by wind scattering, allowing the rotating-vector-model pulse-phase dependence to be preserved.
  • The observed constancy of polarization angle with energy follows because scattering occurs far from the compact object, where relativistic rotation of the polarization plane is negligible.
  • For Seyfert 1 galaxies, the model yields the observed few-percent polarization at their expected inclinations, giving wind opening angles and optical depths that can be compared with spectroscopic outflow diagnostics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If winds are the dominant polarizing site, high-time-resolution polarimetry should show polarization variability smeared or delayed relative to subsecond flux oscillations, since the scattering region is spatially extended; this is a testable distinction from inner-flow models.
  • The same model could be used in reverse: polarimetric measurements, combined with known inclinations, can constrain the wind opening angle and equatorial optical depth and thus the mass-loss rate, offering an independent check on wind properties inferred from absorption lines.
  • Energy-dependent polarization is treated only qualitatively in the paper; if the rising polarization with energy is produced by Doppler beaming of the rotating disk plus equatorial scattering, the model makes the specific prediction that polarization degree increases with photon energy while the angle stays fixed.
  • Real winds may be clumpy and optically thick to multiple scattering, which would reduce or alter the predicted polarization levels; Monte Carlo radiative-transfer simulations with clumpy wind structures would test how much of the parameter space survives.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper develops an analytic single-scattering model for X-ray polarization produced by Thomson scattering in equatorial accretion disk winds around X-ray binaries and AGN. The central illuminating source is treated as point-like with four possible angular emission patterns (isotropic, blackbody disk, Comptonizing slab, electron-scattering-dominated disk), each optionally with intrinsic polarization. The wind is described by a Gaussian optical-depth profile in the cosine of the polar angle with two free parameters (mid-plane optical depth τ0 and opening angle αw). The authors compute the polarization degree of the scattered and total emission as a function of observer inclination, then compare the results qualitatively with IXPE observations of several BH XRBs, NS XRBs, and Seyfert 1 galaxies. The abstract claims that wind scattering can reproduce the observed polarization levels.

Significance. If the model is correct, it offers a unified explanation for several otherwise-puzzling IXPE results, including high polarization at low inclination, constant polarization angle with energy, and the presence of a constant polarized component in pulsars. The analytic derivation in Sec. 2 is transparent, and the limiting result in Eq. (38) is checked against the known Sunyaev & Titarchuk (1985) formula. The paper also clearly delineates the model's scope (single scattering, axisymmetric wind) and identifies concrete observational tests, such as the smearing of QPO polarization variability by an extended wind. These strengths make the paper a useful contribution to the interpretation of X-ray polarimetry. However, the central quantitative claim rests on a single-scattering expression that omits the escape attenuation of the scattered photon and on per-source parameter choices that are made without a formal fitting procedure, so the numerical predictions in Sec. 4 are less robust than the paper implies.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sec. 4, source comparisons] The comparisons with individual sources in Sec. 4 are qualitative: for each source, τ0 and αw are chosen freely and the agreement is judged visually from Figs. 5–10. Because the model has two adjustable parameters per source, the ability to 'reproduce' observed polarization levels carries limited inferential weight unless the parameter choices are tied to independent constraints (e.g., spectroscopic wind diagnostics, source inclination estimates with uncertainties) or a quantitative fit is performed. This does not invalidate the model, but it means the claims in the abstract and Sec. 5 about reproducing the observed levels should be softened or supported by a more rigorous comparison.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Throughout] Several LaTeX artifacts appear in the text, such as 'greaterorsimilar' in Sec. 3.1 and 'greaterorsimilar25' in Sec. 3.1, and 'di fferent' spacing in the abstract; these should be corrected.
  2. [Sec. 2.2, paragraph after Eq. (21)] The sentence 'We note also that the integration limits in Eq. (21) imply that only radiation emitted to the upper hemisphere and scattered in the wind reaches the observer' is helpful, but the parenthetical that radiation emitted to the lower hemisphere could increase the scattered signal is not quantified; a note on the expected magnitude of this effect would improve the discussion.
  3. [Sec. 4.1.2] The discussion of the energy dependence of PD (increasing with energy) is speculative; the text lists several possible mechanisms but does not test them. This is acceptable as a qualitative discussion, but it should be clearly labeled as not part of the presented model's predictions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the wind-scattering polarization is computed forward from an assumed phase matrix and optical-depth profile, not inverted from the observed polarization data.

full rationale

The derivation chain is forward and self-contained. The model takes an assumed incident Stokes vector (Eq. 23) with four independent angular and polarization patterns (Eqs. 24-27), an assumed Gaussian optical-depth profile (Eq. 28), and the Thomson phase matrix (Eq. 22), and computes the single-scattered luminosity via Eq. (21). The analytic limit Eq. (38) is quoted from Sunyaev & Titarchuk (1985) and reproduces the known 33% single-scattering polarization, so the numerical results are benchmarked to an independent result rather than to the observed data. The source comparisons in Sec. 4 use forward curves with chosen tau0 and alpha_w values; although those choices are flexible, the observed PD is not used to define the model or to fit the phase matrix, so the claimed reproduction is not forced by construction. The self-citations (Poutanen et al. 2023 for the Comptonization illuminating pattern; Loktev et al. 2022, 2024 for relativistic disk polarization) supply input radiation patterns, but the core claim also holds for the unpolarized isotropic source (Fig. 5), so those citations are not load-bearing for the central result. The paper itself flags that tau0 up to 1.5 violates its small-optical-depth assumption (Sec. 3.2: 'While the highest considered values of tau0 do not agree with the small optical depth assumption made in our model...'); that is a self-consistency limitation of the single-scattering approximation, not a circular definition or a fitted-input-as-prediction step. No step reduces an output to an input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model rests on standard Thomson scattering radiative transfer plus several simplifying assumptions about wind geometry and source emission that are not independently constrained. The central free parameters, tau0 and alpha_w, are adjusted to match observations in Sec. 4.

free parameters (2)
  • tau0 (equatorial wind optical depth) = 0.5 to 1.5 (explored range, not formally fitted)
    Controls the scattered fraction and total PD; chosen per source to match observations in Sec. 4.
  • alpha_w (wind opening angle) = 10 to 50 degrees (explored range, not formally fitted)
    Controls the angular distribution of scattering material and the sign and magnitude of PD; adjusted per source in the discussion.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Thomson scattering radiative transfer in a plane-parallel slab with the standard Stokes phase matrix (Chandrasekhar 1960).
    Used to derive the scattering equations in Sec. 2.1; accepted background result.
  • domain assumption Single-scattering approximation is valid; multiple scatterings are ignored (Eq. 21 and Sec. 2.2).
    The paper applies this even for tau0 up to 1.5, where the approximation is marginal.
  • domain assumption The wind is axisymmetric, azimuthally symmetric, and exists only above the disk midplane (Fig. 1, Sec. 2.2).
    Simplifies the integration; the paper notes that lower-hemisphere winds would increase the polarization.
  • ad hoc to paper The wind optical depth profile is a Gaussian in mu: tau(mu) = tau0 exp(-mu^2/(2 mu_w^2)) (Eq. 28).
    No physical derivation of this profile is provided; it is chosen as an example and the results depend on it.
  • domain assumption The central X-ray source is point-like and described by one of four analytic angular/emission patterns (Sec. 2.3).
    Valid because the wind size exceeds the source size, but the specific patterns are approximations to real disk/corona emission.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of X-ray polarization from accretion disk winds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VI4M2KWW

@misc{pith2026241118299,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: X-ray polarization from accretion disk winds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VI4M2KWW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18299}
}
read the original abstract

X-ray polarimetry is a fine tool to probe the accretion geometry and physical processes operating in the proximity of compact objects, black holes and neutron stars. Recent discoveries made by the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer put our understanding of the accretion picture in question. The observed high levels of X-ray polarization in X-ray binaries and active galactic nuclei are challenging to achieve within the conventional scenarios. In this work we investigate a possibility that a fraction (or even all) of the observed polarized signal arises from scattering in the equatorial accretion disk winds, the slow and extended outflows, which are often detected in these systems via spectroscopic means. We find that the wind scattering can reproduce the levels of polarization observed in these sources.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.18299 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Angular distribution (a) and polarization (b) of the incident radiation. The solid red, dotted blue, dashed orange, and dot–dashed black lines correspond to the isotropic (iso), blackbody (bb), Comptonization in a slab (comp), and electron-scattering-dominated disk (es) cases, respectively. 2.2. Scattering in a wind Scattering geometry of the wind is obviously not a slab. How￾ever, the expressions for the escaping l… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Probability density for photons to be scattered in a wind for different emission models. The solid, dotted, dashed, and dot–dashed lines correspond to the cases isotropic, blackbody, Comptonization, and electron-scattering-dominated disk, respectively. The red and blue lines correspond to the cases of the wind opening angle αw = 10◦ and 30◦ , respectively. can be approximated with acomp(µ) = 1.73 µ 1 + 5.3µ − 0.2µ 2… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: PD of (a) scattered component and (b) total emission as a func￾tion of inclination for isotropic unpolarized incident source. The solid, dashed, dot-dashed, and dotted lines correspond to different opening angles of the wind: αw = 10◦ , 20◦ , 30◦ , and 40◦ , respective…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Total PD as a function of inclination for varying optical depths: τ0 =0.5 (solid), 0.75 (dashed), 1 (dotted-dashed), 1.25 (dotted), 1.5 (triple-dot-dashed). The illuminating source is taken to be (a) isotropic, (b) blackbody unpolarized disk, (c) Comptonization in a sl…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Contours of the constant total PD (in %) on the plane τ0–αw. The red and blue lines correspond to the inclinations of i = 40◦ and 70◦ , respectively. The positive PD is shown in the solid lines, while the negative PD with the dotted lines. The illuminating source is t…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Peering through the dip: IXPE unveils the extended scattering environment of GX 13+1

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    During the periodic dip of GX 13+1, X-ray polarization rises to 9.1%±1.1% and rotates by ~60° relative to the off-dip state, consistent with scattering in an oblate corona or disk wind.

  2. X-ray Dips and Polarization Angle Swings in GX 13+1

    astro-ph.HE 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    In GX 13+1, X-ray polarization degree rises and the polarization angle swings by about 70 degrees between dip and off-dip states, following changes in source hardness and intensity.

  3. Physics of Strong Magnetism with eXTP

    astro-ph.HE 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    The eXTP mission's planned instruments would enable more sensitive X-ray polarization and timing observations of magnetars and accreting pulsars, potentially testing vacuum birefringence and probing magnetic field structures.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    W., Dauser, T., et al

    Bambi, C., Brenneman, L. W., Dauser, T., et al. 2021, Space Sc i. Rev., 217, 65

    2021

  2. [2]

    C., Williams, P

    Bentz, M. C., Williams, P . R., & Treu, T. 2022, ApJ, 934, 168

    2022

  3. [3]

    2024b, A&A, submitted, arXiv:2409.16023

    Bobrikova, A., Poutanen, J., & Loktev, V . 2024b, A&A, submitted, arXiv:2409.16023

    arXiv

  4. [4]

    2023, ApJ, 94 3, 129 Castro Segura, N., Knigge, C., Long, K

    Capitanio, F., Fabiani, S., Gnarini, A., et al. 2023, ApJ, 94 3, 129 Castro Segura, N., Knigge, C., Long, K. S., et al. 2022, Natur e, 603, 52

    2023

  5. [5]

    1960, Radiative transfer (New Y ork: Dover)

    Chandrasekhar, S. 1960, Radiative transfer (New Y ork: Dover)

    1960

  6. [6]

    2023, A&A, 674, L 10

    Cocchi, M., Gnarini, A., Fabiani, S., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, L 10

    2023

  7. [7]

    A., Piran, T., & Stark, R

    Connors, P . A., Piran, T., & Stark, R. F. 1980, ApJ, 235, 224

    1980

  8. [8]

    A., & Stark, R

    Connors, P . A., & Stark, R. F. 1977, Nature, 269, 128

    1977

Show all 89 references
  1. [9]

    2010, Space Sci

    Costantini, E. 2010, Space Sci. Rev., 157, 265

    2010

  2. [10]

    M., Kraemer, S

    Crenshaw, D. M., Kraemer, S. B., & George, I. M. 2003, ARA&A, 4 1, 117

    2003

  3. [11]

    Dexter, J., & Begelman, M. C. 2024, MNRAS, 528, L157

    2024

  4. [12]

    2012, MNRAS, 426, L71 Di Marco, A., La Monaca, F., Poutanen, J., et al

    Dexter, J., & Quataert, E. 2012, MNRAS, 426, L71 Di Marco, A., La Monaca, F., Poutanen, J., et al. 2023, ApJ, 95 3, L22 Díaz Trigo, M., & Boirin, L. 2016, Astronomische Nachrichte n, 337, 368

    2012

  5. [13]

    2007, A&A Rev., 15, 1

    Done, C., Gierli ´nski, M., & Kubota, A. 2007, A&A Rev., 15, 1

    2007

  6. [14]

    2023, A&A, 677 , A57 Dovˇciak, M., Karas, V ., & Matt, G

    Doroshenko, V ., Poutanen, J., Heyl, J., et al. 2023, A&A, 677 , A57 Dovˇciak, M., Karas, V ., & Matt, G. 2004, MNRAS, 355, 1005 Dovˇciak, M., Muleri, F., Goosmann, R. W., Karas, V ., & Matt, G. 20 08, MNRAS, 391, 32 Dovˇciak, M., Podgorný, J., Svoboda, J., et al. 2024, Galaxi...

    2023

  7. [15]

    T., Blandford, R

    Emmering, R. T., Blandford, R. D., & Shlosman, I. 1992, ApJ, 3 85, 460

    1992

  8. [16]

    A., McClintock, J

    Esin, A. A., McClintock, J. E., & Narayan, R. 1997, ApJ, 489, 8 65

    1997

  9. [17]

    2024, A&A, 684, A137

    Fabiani, S., Capitanio, F., Iaria, R., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A137

    2024

  10. [18]

    2023, MNRAS , 519, 3681

    Farinelli, R., Fabiani, S., Poutanen, J., et al. 2023, MNRAS , 519, 3681

    2023

  11. [19]

    R., & Lasota, J.-P

    Frank, J., King, A. R., & Lasota, J.-P . 1987, A&A, 178, 137

    1987

  12. [20]

    E., Kim, D

    Gianolli, V . E., Kim, D. E., Bianchi, S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 5 23, 4468

    2023

  13. [21]

    E., Bianchi, S., Kammoun, E., et al

    Gianolli, V . E., Bianchi, S., Kammoun, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 6 91, A29

    2024

  14. [22]

    R., Jiang, L., Brandt, W

    Gibson, R. R., Jiang, L., Brandt, W. N., et al. 2009, ApJ, 692, 758

    2009

  15. [23]

    A., Done, C., et al

    Gierlinski, M., Zdziarski, A. A., Done, C., et al. 1997, MNRA S, 288, 958 Gierli´nski, M., Zdziarski, A. A., Poutanen, J., et al. 1999, MNRAS, 309, 496

    1997

  16. [24]

    2019, A&A, 630, A94

    Giustini, M., & Proga, D. 2019, A&A, 630, A94

    2019

  17. [25]

    2005, Ap&SS, 300, 107

    Homan, J., & Belloni, T. 2005, Ap&SS, 300, 107

    2005

  18. [26]

    Ibragimov, A., Poutanen, J., Gilfanov, M., Zdziarski, A. A. , & Shrader, C. R. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 1435

    2005

  19. [27]

    2023, MNRAS, 525 , 5437

    Ingram, A., Ewing, M., Marinucci, A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 525 , 5437

    2023

  20. [28]

    2024, ApJ, 968, 76

    Ingram, A., Bollemeijer, N., V eledina, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 76

    2024

  21. [29]

    A., & Sunyaev, R

    Inogamov, N. A., & Sunyaev, R. A. 1999, Astronomy Letters, 25 , 269

    1999

  22. [30]

    M., & Davis, S

    Jiang, Y .-F., Stone, J. M., & Davis, S. W. 2013, ApJ, 778, 65

    2013

  23. [31]

    A., Berdyugin, A

    Kosenkov, I. A., Berdyugin, A. V ., Piirola, V ., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 4362

    2017

  24. [32]

    A., V eledina, A., Berdyugin, A

    Kosenkov, I. A., V eledina, A., Berdyugin, A. V ., et al. 2020,MNRAS, 496, L96

    2020

  25. [33]

    P ., V eledina, A., et al

    Kravtsov, V ., Nitindala, A. P ., V eledina, A., et al. 2023, The Astronomer’s Tele- gram, 16245, 1

    2023

  26. [34]

    2022, ApJ, 934, 4 Article number, page 12 Anagha P

    Krawczynski, H., & Beheshtipour, B. 2022, ApJ, 934, 4 Article number, page 12 Anagha P . Nitindala et al.: X-ray polarization from disk win ds

    2022

  27. [35]

    2022, Science, 378, 650

    Krawczynski, H., Muleri, F., Dov ˇciak, M., et al. 2022, Science, 378, 650

    2022

  28. [36]

    1998, ApJ, 49 4, 753 La Monaca, F., Di Marco, A., Poutanen, J., et al

    Kuulkers, E., Wijnands, R., Belloni, T., et al. 1998, ApJ, 49 4, 753 La Monaca, F., Di Marco, A., Poutanen, J., et al. 2024, ApJ, 96 0, L11

    1998

  29. [37]

    2022, A&A, 660, A25

    Loktev, V ., V eledina, A., & Poutanen, J. 2022, A&A, 660, A25

    2022

  30. [38]

    Loktev, V ., V eledina, A., Poutanen, J., Nättilä, J., & Sulei manov, V . F. 2024, A&A, 685, A84

    2024

  31. [39]

    2022, MNRAS, 5 16, 5907

    Marinucci, A., Muleri, F., Dovciak, M., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 5 16, 5907

    2022

  32. [40]

    2024, A &A, 684, A95 Mata Sánchez, D., Muñoz-Darias, T., Casares, J., et al

    Marra, L., Brigitte, M., Rodriguez Cavero, N., et al. 2024, A &A, 684, A95 Mata Sánchez, D., Muñoz-Darias, T., Casares, J., et al. 2018 , MNRAS, 481, 2646

    2024

  33. [41]

    1993, MNRAS, 260, 663

    Matt, G. 1993, MNRAS, 260, 663

    1993

  34. [42]

    A., & Weisskopf, M

    Meszaros, P ., Novick, R., Szentgyorgyi, A., Chanan, G. A., & Weisskopf, M. C. 1988, ApJ, 324, 1056

    1988

  35. [43]

    Miller-Jones, J. C. A., Bahramian, A., Orosz, J. A., et al. 20 21, Science, 371, 1046 Muñoz-Darias, T., & Ponti, G. 2022, A&A, 664, A104 Muñoz-Darias, T., Casares, J., Mata Sánchez, D., et al. 2016 , Nature, 534, 75 Muñoz-Darias, T., Armas Padilla, M., Jiménez-Ibarra, F., e t ...

    2022

  36. [44]

    A., & V oit, G

    Murray, N., Chiang, J., Grossman, S. A., & V oit, G. M. 1995, Ap J, 451, 498

    1995

  37. [45]

    Nandra, K., & Pounds, K. A. 1994, MNRAS, 268, 405

    1994

  38. [46]

    Neilsen, J., & Lee, J. C. 2009, Nature, 458, 481

    2009

  39. [47]

    D., & Thorne, K

    Novikov, I. D., & Thorne, K. S. 1973, in Black Holes (Les Astre s Occlus) (New Y ork: Gordon & Breach), 343

    1973

  40. [48]

    N., & Thorne, K

    Page, D. N., & Thorne, K. S. 1974, ApJ, 191, 499

    1974

  41. [49]

    O., Bianchi, S., et al

    Parra, M., Petrucci, P . O., Bianchi, S., et al. 2024, A&A, 681 , A49

    2024

  42. [50]

    1977, MNRAS, 179, 691

    Pineault, S. 1977, MNRAS, 179, 691

    1977

  43. [51]

    Pineault, S., & Roeder, R. C. 1977, ApJ, 213, 548 Podgorný, J., Svoboda, J., Dov ˇciak, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, L12

    1977

  44. [52]

    2016, Astronomische Nachrichten, 337, 512

    Ponti, G., Bianchi, S., Muñoz-Darias, T., et al. 2016, Astronomische Nachrichten, 337, 512

    2016

  45. [53]

    P ., Begelman, M

    Ponti, G., Fender, R. P ., Begelman, M. C., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 422, L11

    2012

  46. [54]

    2001, ApJ, 547, 355

    Popham, R., & Sunyaev, R. 2001, ApJ, 547, 355

    2001

  47. [55]

    A., Done, C., & Osborne, J

    Pounds, K. A., Done, C., & Osborne, J. P . 1995, MNRAS, 277, L5

    1995

  48. [56]

    2020, A&A, 641, A166

    Poutanen, J. 2020, A&A, 641, A166

    2020

  49. [57]

    H., & Ryde, F

    Poutanen, J., Krolik, J. H., & Ryde, F. 1997, MNRAS, 292, L21

    1997

  50. [58]

    N., & Svensson, R

    Poutanen, J., Nagendra, K. N., & Svensson, R. 1996, MNRAS, 28 3, 892

    1996

  51. [59]

    1996, ApJ, 470, 249

    Poutanen, J., & Svensson, R. 1996, ApJ, 470, 249

    1996

  52. [60]

    2014, Space Sci

    Poutanen, J., & V eledina, A. 2014, Space Sci. Rev., 183, 61

    2014

  53. [61]

    Poutanen, J., V eledina, A., & Beloborodov, A. M. 2023, ApJ, 9 49, L10

    2023

  54. [62]

    Poutanen, J., V eledina, A., & Zdziarski, A. A. 2018, A&A, 614 , A79

    2018

  55. [63]

    V ., et al

    Poutanen, J., V eledina, A., Berdyugin, A. V ., et al. 2022, Science, 375, 874

    2022

  56. [64]

    2024, ApJ, 961, L8

    Rankin, J., La Monaca, F., Di Marco, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 961, L8

    2024

  57. [65]

    2024, ApJ, 964, 77

    Ratheesh, A., Dov ˇciak, M., Krawczynski, H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 77

    2024

  58. [66]

    A., & McClintock, J

    Remillard, R. A., & McClintock, J. E. 2006, ARA&A, 44, 49 Rodriguez Cavero, N., Marra, L., Krawczynski, H., et al. 202 3, ApJ, 958, L8

    2006

  59. [67]

    L., Kaaret, P ., Gnarini, A., et al

    Saade, M. L., Kaaret, P ., Gnarini, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 1 33 Sánchez-Sierras, J., & Muñoz-Darias, T. 2020, A&A, 640, L3

    2024

  60. [68]

    D., & Krolik, J

    Schnittman, J. D., & Krolik, J. H. 2009, ApJ, 701, 1175 —. 2010, ApJ, 712, 908

    2009

  61. [69]

    I., & Sunyaev, R

    Shakura, N. I., & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A&A, 24, 337 —. 1988, Adv. Space Res., 8, 135

    1973

  62. [70]

    Sobolev, V . V . 1963, A treatise on radiative transfer (Princeton: V an Nostrand)

    1963

  63. [71]

    Sridhar, N., Ripperda, B., Sironi, L., Davelaar, J., & Belob orodov, A. M. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.10662

    2024 arXiv

  64. [72]

    F., & Connors, P

    Stark, R. F., & Connors, P . A. 1977, Nature, 266, 429

    1977

  65. [73]

    F., Nathan, E., Hu, K., et al

    Steiner, J. F., Nathan, E., Hu, K., et al. 2024, ApJ, 969, L30

    2024

  66. [74]

    2006, MNRAS, 369, 2036

    Suleimanov, V ., & Poutanen, J. 2006, MNRAS, 369, 2036

    2006

  67. [75]

    F., Poutanen, J., & Werner, K

    Suleimanov, V . F., Poutanen, J., & Werner, K. 2020, A&A, 639, A33

    2020

  68. [76]

    A., & Titarchuk, L

    Sunyaev, R. A., & Titarchuk, L. G. 1980, A&A, 86, 121 —. 1985, A&A, 143, 374

    1980

  69. [77]

    2023, MNR AS, 525, 4735

    Tagliacozzo, D., Marinucci, A., Ursini, F., et al. 2023, MNR AS, 525, 4735

    2023

  70. [78]

    2021, MNRAS, 501, 3393

    Taverna, R., Marra, L., Bianchi, S., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 3393

    2021

  71. [79]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 7047

    Tomaru, R., Done, C., & Odaka, H. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 7047

    2024

  72. [80]

    N., et al

    Tombesi, F., Cappi, M., Reeves, J. N., et al. 2010, A&A, 521, A 57

    2010

  73. [81]

    A., Lapshov, I., & Kaaret, P

    Tomsick, J. A., Lapshov, I., & Kaaret, P . 1998, ApJ, 494, 747

    1998

  74. [82]

    2024, Galaxie s, 12, 43 van der Klis, M

    Ursini, F., Gnarini, A., Capitanio, F., et al. 2024, Galaxie s, 12, 43 van der Klis, M. 2005, Astronomische Nachrichten, 326, 798 V eledina, A., & Poutanen, J. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 939 V eledina, A., Berdyugin, A. V ., Kosenkov, I. A., et al. 2019,A&A, 623, A75 V eledina, A., Mul...

    2024

  75. [83]

    2004, A&A, 426, 985

    Viironen, K., & Poutanen, J. 2004, A&A, 426, 985

    2004

  76. [84]

    D., Gurwell, M., McCollough, M., & Rao, R

    Vrtilek, S. D., Gurwell, M., McCollough, M., & Rao, R. 2023, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16230, 1

    2023

  77. [85]

    C., Soffitta, P ., Baldini, L., et al

    Weisskopf, M. C., Soffitta, P ., Baldini, L., et al. 2022, JA TIS, 8, 026002

    2022

  78. [86]

    A., & Gierli ´nski, M

    Zdziarski, A. A., & Gierli ´nski, M. 2004, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 155, 99

    2004

  79. [87]

    A., Poutanen, J., & Johnson, W

    Zdziarski, A. A., Poutanen, J., & Johnson, W. N. 2000, ApJ, 54 2, 703

    2000

  80. [88]

    2019, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 62, 29502

    Zhang, S., Santangelo, A., Feroci, M., et al. 2019, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 62, 29502

    2019

  81. [89]

    2022, MNRAS, 515, 2882 Article number, page 13

    Zhang, W., Dovˇciak, M., Bursa, M., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 2882 Article number, page 13

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.