Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 65 references

Peering through the periodic dip of the neutron-star binary GX 13+1, X-ray polarization peaks at 9.1% and swings ~60° in angle, exposing the geometry of the corona or wind that scatters the disk's light.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 00:35 UTC pith:PHZIO7LJ

load-bearing objection The IXPE dip-timed observation of GX 13+1 is a real advance on the observational side, but the geometry constraints in §4.2 lean on a toy model that the paper's own two-component spectropolarimetry undercuts. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.28714 v1 pith:PHZIO7LJ submitted 2026-07-30 astro-ph.HE

Peering through the dip: IXPE unveils the extended scattering environment of GX 13+1

Alessandro Di Marco , Fabio La Monaca , Luigi Stella , Anagha P. Nitindala , Alexandra Veledina , Anna Bobrikova , Eleonora Veronica Lai , Alessandro Papitto
show 12 more authors
Maura Pilia Juri Poutanen Daniele Rogantini Matteo Bachetti Maria Cristina Baglio Caterina Ballocco Ettore Del Monte Wei Deng Giulia Illiano Vladislav Loktev Sara Motta Fei Xie
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords X-ray polarimetryGX 13+1neutron star low-mass X-ray binaryaccretion disk coronadisk windperiodic dipsIXPEpolarization angle rotation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper claims that the recurring 24.5-day dip of the neutron-star X-ray binary GX 13+1 — when the thickened bulge where the accretion stream hits the disk crosses the line of sight — acts as a polarimetric probe of the scattering environment around the disk. In the first campaign deliberately timed to catch that dip, using IXPE, NuSTAR, and Swift, the authors find that the polarization degree rises to 9.1%±1.1% (8.3σ) at the dip center while the polarization angle rotates by ~60° relative to the off-dip state; the dip state's polarization also grows with energy while the off-dip state stays flat. Fitting the dip-center polarization with the Brown & McLean (1977) single-scattering model, they obtain either an oblate accretion disk corona with equatorial radius at least 1.5 times the polar radius and optical depth ~0.3, or a disk wind with electron density ~1.3×10^14 cm^-3 and a ~40° opening angle (optical depth ~0.2). If right, this means X-ray polarimetry can resolve the geometry of a scattering component that dips and absorption lines had detected but not shaped — and the derived geometry lines up with wind parameters from high-resolution X-ray spectroscopy.

Core claim

The central claim: polarization at the bottom of the periodic dip comes from Thomson scattering in the medium around the neutron star, and its magnitude and angle constrain that medium. At dip center, polarization degree peaks at 9.1%±1.1% (8.3σ), angle is rotated ~60° from the off-dip value, and dip-state polarization rises with energy (slope 1.5±0.2 %/keV) while the off-dip state is flat. Fitting the dip-center value with the Brown & McLean (1977) single-scattering relations at ~65° inclination yields an oblate accretion disk corona (Req/Rpol ≥1.5, τ~0.3) or a disk wind (n0~1.3×10^14 cm^-3, opening angle ~40°, τ~0.23). The symmetric model alone cannot produce the observed angle rotation; a

What carries the argument

The load-bearing identity is the Brown & McLean (1977) Thomson-scattering polarization formula applied to the dip-center measurement. For an oblate axisymmetric corona it gives PD = τ(1−3γ) sin²i, where τ is the Thomson optical depth and the shape factor γ depends on the axial ratio a = Req/Rpol; for a conical disk wind it gives PD = (3/16) σ_T n0 R sin φ_w cos²φ_w sin²i. A Bayesian fit (uniform priors, inclination 65°) converts the measured PD=9.1%±1.1% into the reported corona flattening/optical depth or wind density/opening angle. The argument is carried by time-resolved polarimetry in the Stokes (q,u) plane, which separates the dip-dominated segment S1 from the off-dip segment S2 and exp

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the dip-center polarization is produced entirely by single Thomson scattering of an unpolarized, point-like central source in an optically thin, axisymmetrically shaped envelope, with the system inclination fixed at ~65°; the authors themselves note this symmetric model cannot reproduce the observed ~60° polarization-angle rotation, which needs an additional misaligned component. If direct or differently polarized emission contributes at dip c

What would settle it

Re-observe GX 13+1 with IXPE through two or more complete periodic dips at higher count statistics. If the dip-center polarization does not reproduce near 9% with the ~60° angle swing, or if ingress and egress polarization are measurably asymmetric about dip center, the symmetric-single-scattering picture — and its fitted corona flattening and wind density — is ruled out. Sharper still: the model assumes dip-center light is almost purely scattered; a simultaneous spectrum showing a substantial direct, unpolarized component at dip center would invalidate the fitted τ and density.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Each 24.5-day dip becomes a clean polarimetric probe: at dip center the scattered component dominates, so the measured PD and PA convert directly into coronal shape and optical depth (or wind density and opening angle).
  • The derived geometry gives spectroscopy a target: wind density ~1.3×10^14 cm^-3 and ~40° opening angle (or corona flattening ≥1.5) are predictions that high-resolution X-ray spectra of GX 13+1 can confirm or contradict.
  • A scattering-dominated dip state should show energy-dependent polarization, while the off-dip direct state should not — a general diagnostic for separating scattered and direct emission in dipping sources.
  • Because the symmetric model cannot generate the observed ~60° angle swing, the scattering geometry around GX 13+1 is non-axisymmetric (the bulge itself breaks symmetry); future dip timings should resolve PA structure inside the dip.
  • The spectropolarimetric decomposition finds the thermal disk and Comptonized components polarized at PAs ~77° apart, near the 90° expected for an aligned disk and boundary layer — a constraint on the relative orientation of these regions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the dip-center signal is as clean as claimed, the same dip-timed strategy should work on other high-inclination dipping binaries; a comparable PD peak and PA swing there would show the geometry is generic, while their absence would delimit which systems scatter this way. (Editorial inference.)
  • The wind parameters imply a concrete mass-loss rate: with n0~1.3×10^14 cm^-3 over a ~1.8×10^10 cm scale and a 40° opening angle, the implied outflow rate could be compared against radiation-driving predictions — a check the paper does not perform. (Editorial inference.)
  • The measured near-orthogonality of the two polarized components (~77°) hints that the boundary layer or inner disk may be slightly tilted relative to the outer disk; a polarimetric campaign spanning a full orbit could test whether the misalignment is fixed or precesses. (Editorial inference.)
  • The energy slope (1.5±0.2 %/keV) inside the dip is a testable signature: if scattering geometry drives it, the slope should track dip depth, steepening as the direct component is more fully blocked; flux-binned future data can check this directly. (Editorial inference.)

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents coordinated IXPE, NuSTAR, and Swift-XRT observations of the neutron-star LMXB GX 13+1, timed to cover the source's 24.5-day periodic dip. The model-independent IXPE analysis shows that the polarization degree rises to 9.1% ± 1.1% at the center of the periodic dip (8.3σ), that the polarization angle rotates by roughly 60° between the dipping segment S1 and the subsequent off-dip segment S2, and that in S1 the polarization degree increases with energy (slope 1.5 ± 0.2 %/keV in the spectropolarimetric fit). Spectral modeling of the simultaneous NuSTAR/Swift data places the source in the normal branch with a Comptonized continuum and reflection features. The authors interpret the dip-center polarization with a Brown & McLean single-scattering model, deriving either an oblate accretion disk corona with Req/Rpol ≳ 1.5 and τ ≈ 0.3, or a disk wind with n0 ≈ 1.3 × 10^14 cm^-3 and opening angle ≈ 40°.

Significance. The observational centerpiece of the paper is significant: the 8.3σ detection of enhanced polarization at the center of a periodic dip, together with the ~60° PA rotation and the energy-dependent PD in the dip state, is an important result for X-ray polarimetry of dipping NS-LMXBs. The coordinated multi-instrument campaign, the use of standard IXPE analysis tools, and the explicit likelihood-based fitting are strengths. If the geometry constraints were robust, they would be a valuable step toward resolving the scattering medium in these systems. However, as developed below, the geometry inference in §4.2 is not yet on the same footing as the model-independent measurements: the quoted ADC/wind parameters rely on assumptions that are contradicted by the paper's own spectropolarimetric decomposition. The observational detection and its qualitative interpretation are likely to survive, but the quantitative geometry constraints need revision or substantial caveating.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.2, Eq. (4)] The likelihood in Eq. (4) directly equates the observed dip-center PD = 9.1% ± 1.1% with the polarization predicted for a single Thomson-scattering, axisymmetric envelope illuminated by an unpolarized point source. This is inconsistent with the paper's own spectropolarimetric results in §3.3: for S1, Model A gives PD_diskbb = 12% ± 2% at PA = 28° ± 5° and PD_comptt = 7.9% ± 0.4% at PA = −49.0° ± 1.6°. The observed polarization is therefore a vector sum of at least two components with different angles, and the last paragraph of §4.2 explicitly states that a second, misaligned polarized component is required to explain the PA rotation. If such a component contributes at dip center, then the observed PD is not equal to the scattered-only PD assumed in Eq. (4). The inferred values a = 5, τ = 0.30, n0 = 1.3 × 10^14 cm^-3, and φw = 40° are therefore not robustly constrained; they are outputs o
  2. [§3, dip flux; §4.2] The model assumes that all radiation at dip center is Thomson-scattered in the ADC/wind. But the paper states that the flux during the dips reduces by only ~35% relative to the out-of-dip level. A substantial unocculted or direct component therefore plausibly remains at dip center. If that component is unpolarized, the intrinsic scattered PD must be larger than 9.1%, changing the derived τ and geometry; if it is polarized and misaligned, the effect is even more severe. No term for direct emission or dilution appears in Eqs. (2)–(6), and no systematic uncertainty from this effect is included in the contours of Figs. 10–11. This is a load-bearing omission for the central geometry claim.
  3. [§4.2, Eqs. (2), (5), (6)] The Brown & McLean formulas used here describe single Thomson scattering in an optically thin, axisymmetric envelope. The paper itself derives τ ≈ 0.3 for the ADC and τ ≈ 0.23 for the wind; at these optical depths multiple scattering is not completely negligible and can modify both PD and PA at the tens-of-percent level. In addition, the model is fit only to PD; the PA is not used in Eq. (4). Since the observed ~60° PA rotation cannot be reproduced by the axisymmetric model (as the authors acknowledge), the single-component fit to PD alone cannot be regarded as a complete constraint on the scattering geometry. At minimum, the systematic uncertainty from multiple scattering and from the ignored PA should be quantified before the quoted parameter ranges are presented as constraints.
  4. [Abstract and §5] The abstract and conclusion state that the modeling 'constrains' the geometry of the scattering medium and give specific values for Req/Rpol, τ, n0, and φw. Given the issues above, these are conditional on a simplified toy model and are strongly degenerate: two different geometries (ADC and wind) fit the same single data point, and the contours in Figs. 10–11 are broad and asymmetric. The wording should be softened to reflect that the data are consistent with these geometries under stated assumptions, rather than that the geometry is robustly measured. This reframing does not affect the model-independent polarization measurements, but it is necessary for the paper's claims to match the evidence.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and §3.1] The abstract says 'more than 8σ CL' while the text reports 8.3σ; please use a consistent, precise statement.
  2. [§3, Fig. 1] The dip flux reduction ('~38 counts/s to less than ~25') should specify the energy band (2–8 keV) and clarify whether these are IXPE total count rates, as the text is not explicit at that point.
  3. [§3.2, Table 3] The Model A and Model B fits are presented with different parameterizations, but the text does not fully explain why Model B's reflection component is preferred or not; a brief comparison of the physical implications would improve readability.
  4. [§4.2, Eqs. (5)–(6)] Please define R consistently and state whether it is assumed to be the outer wind radius used from XRISM; currently the notation in Eq. (5) and the text could be clearer.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the geometry constraints are parameter fits to the measured dip polarization using an external scattering formula, not predictions derived from the fitted values.

full rationale

The derivation chain in §4.2 is a standard model-inference step: PDdip=9.1%±1.1% measured at the dip center enters the likelihood (Eq. 4) and is compared to the Brown & McLean (1977) scattering prediction (Eqs. 2 and 5), with parameters (τ, a) or (n0, φw) sampled from stated priors. The same measured value is not reused as an independent confirmation; the output parameter values are best-fit estimates, not predictions generated from fitted parameters. Brown & McLean is an external, parameter-free formula with stated assumptions, and XRISM is used only as an external comparison for the inferred density/optical depth. The paper's self-citations (Di Marco et al. 2025; Bobrikova et al. 2024a,b; Nitindala et al. 2025) provide context and agreement checks but are not load-bearing in the fit. The acknowledged failure of the axisymmetric model to reproduce the PA rotation (§4.2, last paragraph) and the possible contamination of PDdip by a second polarized component are modeling-validity concerns, not circularity: nothing in the derivation is equivalent to its input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central geometry claims rest on four fitted parameters (τ, a, n0, φw) plus a fixed inclination, and on the single-scattering axisymmetric toy model. The model inverts a single measured PD value, so the output constraints inherit the model's assumptions. No new particles, forces, or entities are introduced; the ADC and disk wind are pre-existing astrophysical components.

free parameters (5)
  • ADC optical depth τ_ADC = 0.30 (+0.27/−0.07)
    Fitted to the dip-center PD=9.1%±1.1% via Eq. (2) and likelihood Eq. (4), with uniform prior τ=[0,1] (§4.2, Fig. 10).
  • ADC oblateness a=Req/Rpol = 5 (+4/−3), lower bound ≥1.5
    Fitted to the same PD_dip via Eq. (2)/(4), with uniform prior a=[1,10] (§4.2, Fig. 10).
  • Disk-wind electron density n0 = 1.3 (+1.3/−0.4) ×10^14 cm^-3
    Fitted to PD_dip via Eq. (5)/(6), with uniform prior n0=[10^12,10^15] cm^-3 (§4.2, Fig. 11).
  • Disk-wind opening angle φw = 40° (+20/−30)
    Fitted to PD_dip via Eq. (5)/(6), with uniform prior φw=[10°,70°] (§4.2, Fig. 11).
  • System inclination i = 65° (NuSTAR relxillNS best-fit 63.9 +1.0/−1.2)
    Fixed at ~65° in the polarization model; all inferred geometry parameters scale with sin^2 i. The value comes from the same paper's NuSTAR spectral fit (Table 3).
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Brown & McLean (1977) single-scattering polarization formula for an optically thin axisymmetric electron-scattering envelope (Eqs. 2 and 5)
    The geometry constraints rely directly on this formula; no Monte Carlo or multi-scattering validation is provided in the paper.
  • ad hoc to paper The illuminating X-ray source is unpolarized and point-like
    Explicitly stated in §4.2. If the seed photons are polarized or the source is extended, the measured PD cannot be directly converted to τ, a, n0, and φw.
  • ad hoc to paper The polarization at the dip center is due only to X-rays scattered in the ADC or disk wind, with no direct unpolarized dilution
    Assumed in §4.2 before Eq. (2). Any direct component at dip center would require a larger scattered PD and change the inferred geometry.
  • ad hoc to paper The scattering medium is axisymmetric (oblate spheroid ADC or conical disk wind)
    Used in Eqs. (2)–(6). The authors note that the PA rotation requires a second, non-axisymmetric/misaligned component, so the quoted constraints are incomplete.
  • domain assumption Disk-wind outer radius R=1.8×10^10 cm is taken from XRISM
    Equation (6) and the wind density inference depend on this radius, quoted from Xrism Collaboration et al. (2025) and not remeasured here.
  • standard math Thomson scattering cross-section and optically thin single-scattering regime
    Standard physics used in Eq. (1) and throughout the scattering model.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 22719 in / 16907 out tokens · 176604 ms · 2026-08-03T00:35:58.887901+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Neutron star low-mass X-ray binaries feature complex accretion geometries, often including an accretion disk corona or disk winds. Here, a study of the highly inclined dipping source GX 13+1, using coordinated observations from the IXPE, NuSTAR, and Swift-XRT, is presented; this is the first time that such a campaign was conducted to monitor its periodic dip. Our analysis reveals significant variations in polarimetric properties tracking the dip. At the center of the dip, the polarization degree reaches a maximum of ${\sim}$9% (at more than $8\sigma$ confidence level). This is accompanied by a highly significant polarization angle rotation of roughly 60$^\circ$ when passing from the dip to the subsequent off-dip state. Furthermore, the dip state exhibits energy-dependent polarization. By modeling the polarization during the periodic dip, we constrain the geometry of the scattering medium. In the scenario of an oblate extended accretion disk corona (ADC), an equatorial radius at least 1.5 times its polar radius is needed with $\tau{\sim}0.3$. Alternatively, the results can be modeled as scattering in a disk wind with a most probable electron density of $1.3\times10^{14}$ cm$^{-3}$ and an opening angle near 40$^\circ$, corresponding to an optical depth of ${\sim}0.2$. The obtained results highlight the crucial role of X-ray polarimetric data to unveil the geometry of the extended scattering environment surrounding the accretion disks, advancing our understanding of neutron star low-mass X-ray binaries.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.28714 by Alessandro Di Marco, Alessandro Papitto, Alexandra Veledina, Anagha P. Nitindala, Anna Bobrikova, Caterina Ballocco, Daniele Rogantini, Eleonora Veronica Lai, Ettore Del Monte, Fabio La Monaca, Fei Xie, Giulia Illiano, Juri Poutanen, Luigi Stella, Maria Cristina Baglio, Matteo Bachetti, Maura Pilia, Sara Motta, Vladislav Loktev, Wei Deng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: IXPE light curve in 2–8 keV (top) and the hardness ratio (bot￾tom) for the present observation (time bins of 200 s and 300 s, respec￾tively). The dashed vertical line reports the expected epoch of the dip, corresponding to orbital phase 1.0. The green and light blue bands re￾port the periods of coverage by Swift-XRT and NuSTAR, respectively. The center of the observed periodic dip is indicated by an arrow,… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Allowed regions for PD and PA at different confidence levels. In this section, we report the model-independent analysis performed using the pcube algorithm in the xpbin tool of the ixpeobssim software (Baldini et al. 2022) applying the un￾weighted approach (Di Marco et al. 2022b). Considering the full new observation performed in September 2025, IXPE data in the nominal 2–8 keV energy band show a polarizat… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: NuSTAR CCD (top) and HID (bottom) in 128 s time bins. The blue points refer to the present observation; in orange are reported the points from observation ID 30901010002 corresponding to a peculiarly obscured state (Xrism Collaboration et al. 2025); the grey points are from the other two NuSTAR observations of GX 13+1 available in the NuSTAR archive. 1 Iaria et al. 2014 report a periodic dip lasting ∼10 − … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Allowed regions for PD and PA in the S1 (blue) and the S2 (orange) periods. Regions are reported at 99% CL. nificant difference in the polarization is observed during the en￾trance and the egress of the periodic dip in the present data, and the polarization in the middle of it reaches the maximum value of 9.1%±1.1% at −47◦±3 ◦ (significant at 8.3σ CL). These time￾resolved analyses followed the procedures a… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Polarization properties of GX 13+1 as a function of time with narrow selections of the dips. The panels from top to bottom show PD and PA, respectively. The gray points in both panels show the 2–8 keV count rate (right axis). Errors are at 68% CL. (2024b), although with a lower significance. The same study for energy dependence was performed in each time bin of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: GX 13+1 polarization degree (top) and angle (bottom) as a function of energy for the S1 (left) and the S2 (right) segments. Error bars are at 68% CL. In the left panels, the blue line represents the best fit for the linear trend, and the shaded regions indicate the uncertainties on it at 1σ, 2σ, and 3σ CL. In the right panels, the blue lines represent the average PD and PA as obtained in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Time dependence of the normalized Stokes parameters q and u in the four IXPE observations of GX 13+1. The grey circles represent all the available points; the blue points are from the observation of October 2023, applying the same constant time binning as in Bobrikova et al. 2024b; the orange points are from the observation of February 2024, applying the same constant time binning as in Bobrikova et al. 20… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Constraints for the DW geometry reported in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Constraints for the ADC geometry reported in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: NuSTAR spectral variability of GX 13+1, with orange points re￾porting the Observation ID 30901010002 corresponding to a peculiarly absorbed state. during the periodic dip, we used the ephemeris from Iaria et al. 20143 to determine the orbital phase of the observation analyzed by Stella et al. (1985) which was performed by EXOSAT in 1983 between September 22 at 20:13 UTC and September 23 at 00:18 UTC. The … view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Quasi-periodic oscillations and noise in low-mass X-ray binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.27.090189.002505 , adsurl =

    arXiv

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    Two patterns of correlated X-ray timing and spectral behaviour in low-mass X-ray binaries. , keywords =

  3. [3]

    Advances in Space Research , keywords =

    The theory of an accretion disk/ neutron star boundary layer. Advances in Space Research , keywords =. doi:10.1016/0273-1177(88)90396-1 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1016/0273-1177(88)90396-1

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    Accretion Disk Boundary Layers around Neutron Stars: X-Ray Production in Low-Mass X-Ray Binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/318336 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0004017 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    Astronomy Letters , keywords =

    Spread of matter over a neutron-star surface during disk accretion. Astronomy Letters , keywords =

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    Spectra of the spreading layers on the neutron star surface and constraints on the neutron star equation of state. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10454.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0601689 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2006

  7. [7]

    , keywords =

    Accretion disk coronae. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/159991 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/159991

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    The Formation and Structure of a Strongly Magnetized Corona above a Weakly Magnetized Accretion Disk. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/308736 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9912135 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    , keywords =

    Modelling the disc atmosphere of the low mass X-ray binary EXO 0748-676. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834000 , archivePrefix =. 1809.06864 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Accretion disc winds in X-ray binaries. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.05319 , archivePrefix =. 2601.05319 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.05319

  11. [11]

    , keywords =

    Infrared spectroscopy of low-mass X-ray binaries - II. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02547.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9901327 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 1999

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    Simultaneous X-Ray and Radio Observations of GX 13+1. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/166312 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/166312

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    Stratified wind from a super-Eddington X-ray binary is slower than expected. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09495-w , archivePrefix =. 2509.14555 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    Common Patterns in the Evolution between the Luminous Neutron Star Low-Mass X-ray Binary Subclasses. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/52 , archivePrefix =. 1504.00022 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    , keywords =

    Relativistic X-ray reflection and photoionized absorption in the neutron star low-mass X-ray binary GX 13+1. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1157 , archivePrefix =. 2304.03130 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Discovery of periodic dips in the light curve of GX 13+1: the X-ray orbital ephemeris of the source. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322328 , archivePrefix =. 1310.6628 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    , keywords =

    Properties of the 24 Day Modulation in GX 13+1 from Near-infrared and X-ray Observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/719/1/979 , archivePrefix =. 1006.5068 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219049 , journal =

    XMM-Newton observations of GX + 1: correlation between photoionised absorption and broad line emission , url =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219049 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219049

  19. [19]

    , keywords =

    Chandra X-ray spectroscopy of a clear dip in GX 13+1. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322044 , archivePrefix =. 1403.0071 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    , keywords =

    X-Ray Dips and Polarization Angle Swings in GX 13+1. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ada7f8 , archivePrefix =. 2501.05511 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  21. [21]

    , keywords =

    EXOSAT observations of X 1822-371 : modelling of the accretion disc rim. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/239.3.715 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/239.3.715

  22. [22]

    , keywords =

    X-ray orbital modulations from low-mass X-ray binaries. , keywords =

  23. [23]

    American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts , year = 2026, series =

    Revealing the Most Extreme Accretion Disk Winds with XRISM. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts , year = 2026, series =

    2026

  24. [24]

    , keywords =

    A Persistent Disk Wind and Variable Jet Outflow in the Neutron-star Low-mass X-Ray Binary GX 13+1. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adcabe , archivePrefix =. 2504.05452 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    , keywords =

    The Instrument of the Imaging X-Ray Polarimetry Explorer. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac19b0 , archivePrefix =. 2108.00284 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    JATIS , keywords =

    The Imaging X-Ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE): Pre-Launch. JATIS , keywords =. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.8.2.026002 , archivePrefix =. 2112.01269 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    , keywords =

    X-ray polarization properties of thermal-radiative disc winds in binary systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3649 , archivePrefix =. 2308.07237 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [28]

    , keywords =

    X-ray polarization from accretion disk winds. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453188 , archivePrefix =. 2411.18299 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    , keywords =

    The detection of high X-ray polarization from an accretion disc corona source and its modelling via Monte Carlo radiation transfer simulation. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stag498 , archivePrefix =. 2509.26147 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    Discovery of a strong rotation of the X-ray polarization angle in the galactic burster GX 13+1. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449318 , archivePrefix =. 2401.13058 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    , keywords =

    New polarimetric study of the galactic X-ray burster GX 13+1. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450207 , archivePrefix =. 2404.01859 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    Recent Results on Cataclysmic Variables

    The Spectral and Temporal Variability of GX:13+1. Recent Results on Cataclysmic Variables. The Importance of IUE and Exosat Results on Cataclysmic Variables and Low-Mass X-Ray Binaries , year = 1985, editor =

    1985

  33. [33]

    SoftwareX , keywords =

    ixpeobssim: a Simulation and Analysis Framework for the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer. SoftwareX , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.softx.2022.101194 , archivePrefix =. 2203.06384 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    A Weighted Analysis to Improve the X-Ray Polarization Sensitivity of the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer , journal =

    Alessandro. A Weighted Analysis to Improve the X-Ray Polarization Sensitivity of the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer , journal =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac51c9 , url =

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac51c9 2022

  35. [35]

    The Journal of Open Source Software , keywords =

    UltraNest - a robust, general purpose Bayesian inference engine. The Journal of Open Source Software , keywords =. doi:10.21105/joss.03001 , archivePrefix =. 2101.09604 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V , year = 1996, series =

    XSPEC: The First Ten Years. Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V , year = 1996, series =

    1996

  37. [37]

    , keywords =

    On the Absorption of X-Rays in the Interstellar Medium. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/317016 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0008425 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    , keywords =

    Analytic FITS for partial photoionization cross sections. , keywords =

  39. [39]

    , keywords =

    Modelling the spectral response of the Swift-XRT CCD camera: experience learnt from in-flight calibration. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200811157 , archivePrefix =. 0811.4246 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    , keywords =

    Magnesium and silicon in interstellar dust: X-ray overview. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936805 , archivePrefix =. 2007.03329 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    Investigating interstellar dust along the line of sight of GX 13+1 using different dust-size distributions. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557791 , archivePrefix =. 2604.24570 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    , keywords =

    X-ray spectropolarimetric characterisation of the Z source GX 340+0 in the normal branch. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555134 , archivePrefix =. 2508.13278 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  43. [43]

    , keywords =

    Relativistic X-Ray Reflection Models for Accreting Neutron Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac3cb7 , archivePrefix =. 2111.12838 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    , keywords =

    Accretion geometry of the neutron star low mass X-ray binary Cyg X-2 from X-ray polarization measurements. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3726 , archivePrefix =. 2212.13119 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    , keywords =

    Thermonuclear (Type I) X-Ray Bursts Observed by the Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/592044 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0608259 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    , keywords =

    The masses and spins of neutron stars and stellar-mass black holes. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.003 , archivePrefix =. 1408.4145 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  47. [47]

    , keywords =

    Reflecting on accretion in neutron star low-mass X-ray binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10509-024-04281-y , archivePrefix =. 2401.15787 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    , keywords =

    Polarization of X-ray emission from the Sgr B2 cloud. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05113.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0111065 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2002

  49. [49]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    Cygnus X-3 revealed as a Galactic ultraluminous X-ray source by IXPE. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02294-9 , archivePrefix =. 2303.01174 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    , keywords =

    Comptonization of low-frequency radiation in accretion disks Angular distribution and polarization of hard radiation. , keywords =

  51. [51]

    , keywords =

    X-ray spectropolarimetric characterization of GX 340+0 in the horizontal branch: A highly inclined source?. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451966 , archivePrefix =. 2410.00972 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    , keywords =

    IXPE view of the Sco-like source GX 349+2 in the normal branch. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555647 , archivePrefix =. 2507.07163 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  53. [53]

    , keywords =

    Highly Significant Detection of X-Ray Polarization from the Brightest Accreting Neutron Star Sco X-1. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad132d , archivePrefix =. 2311.06359 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  54. [54]

    Journal of High Energy Astrophysics , keywords =

    Decoding Cygnus X-2: The critical role of reflection in IXPE data. Journal of High Energy Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2026.100548 , archivePrefix =. 2601.01669 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    , keywords =

    Polarized radiation coming from the spreading layer of the weakly magnetized neutron stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452358 , archivePrefix =. 2409.16023 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  56. [56]

    Astronomische Nachrichten , keywords =

    Weakly Magnetized Accreting Neutron Stars as Seen by IXPE. Astronomische Nachrichten , keywords =. doi:10.1002/asna.20240126 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1002/asna.20240126

  57. [57]

    Polarisation by Thomson Scattering in Optically Thin Stellar Envelopes. I. Source Star at Centre of Axisymmetric Envelope. , year = 1977, month = may, volume =

    1977

  58. [58]

    , keywords =

    The structure of the relativistic Fe line in GX 340+0 as viewed with XRISM/Resolve, NICER, and NuSTAR. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/pasj/psaf085 , archivePrefix =. 2507.06289 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [59]

    Astroparticle Physics , keywords =

    Design, construction, and test of the Gas Pixel Detectors for the IXPE mission. Astroparticle Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2021.102628 , archivePrefix =. 2107.05496 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    , keywords =

    Calibration of the IXPE Focal Plane X-Ray Polarimeters to Polarized Radiation. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac7719 , archivePrefix =. 2206.07582 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [61]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    The hitchhiker's guide to the IXPE data analysis. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.03366 , archivePrefix =. 2604.03366 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.03366

  62. [62]

    , keywords =

    Handling the Background in IXPE Polarimetric Data. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acba0f , archivePrefix =. 2302.02927 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [63]

    , keywords =

    The Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Mission. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/422091 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0405233 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [64]

    , keywords =

    Panchromatic study of GRB 060124: from precursor to afterglow. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065071 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0602497 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  65. [65]

    , keywords =

    The Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR) High-energy X-Ray Mission. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/103 , archivePrefix =. 1301.7307 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv