Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 68 references

Stability and Dynamics of Skyrmion and Skyrmion Bags Explored under the Influence of Out-of-Plane Strain and Its Gradient

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A strain gradient can control the current-driven motion of skyrmions and skyrmion bags, cancel the skyrmion Hall effect, and make deflection depend on topological charge.

desk verdict A solid micromagnetic demonstration of strain-gradient steering for skyrmion bags, but the Thiele 'agreement' is a fit dressed as a prediction. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18332 v1 pith:NOENWUZR submitted 2024-11-27 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Naim Ahmad , Chirag Kalouni , Abhay Singh Rajawat , Waseem Akhtar This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords magneticskyrmionsskyrmionbagsHalleffectout-of-planestraingradientThieleequationmicromagneticsimulationracetrackmemory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using micromagnetic simulations, this paper sets out to establish that out-of-plane strain stabilizes skyrmions (whirl-like magnetic textures) and skyrmion bags (an outer skyrmion wrapping several opposite-charge inner skyrmions) in ferromagnetic films, and that a spatial gradient of that strain can control how these textures move under an electric current. The central result is a set of linear relations: a strain gradient applied parallel to the electron flow increases the transverse velocity, while a gradient applied perpendicular to the flow slows, and eventually reverses, the longitudinal motion. For skyrmion bags, the deflection and velocity scale with the bag's topological charge, and a suitably chosen positive gradient cancels the skyrmion Hall effect, restoring straight-line motion. The paper argues that these simulated dynamics match the Thiele equation once a strain-gradient force is added. If the claim holds, strain gradients give a local, energy-efficient knob for racetrack-memory-style devices.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Thiele equation in the rigid-particle approximation, $G\times(v_e-v)+D(\beta v_e-\alpha v)+F_{\rm strain}=0$, with $G=4\pi Q M_{\rm sat}t/\gamma$ the gyromagnetic coupling, $D$ the dissipative tensor, and $F_{\rm strain}=-\nabla W_{\rm strain}$. The strain energy is $W_{\rm strain}=-(3/2)\epsilon_{zz}k\lambda(m\cdot\hat z)^2$, so a linear strain gradient creates a nearly constant force. For a circular skyrmion $D$ is taken diagonal with $D\equiv G$, giving the simplified velocity formulas used to fit the $Q=-1$ data; for bags the full tensor (including $D_{xy},D_{yx}$) is used. This machinery converts simulated trajectories into force-velocity relations and provides the predicted gradient strength that cancels the skyrmion Hall effect.

What would settle it

Compute the strain-gradient force directly from the micromagnetic energy density at each simulation snapshot, $F_{\rm strain}=-\int \partial W_{\rm strain}/\partial{\bf r}\,d^2r$, and compare those values with the fitted $F_x$, $F_y$ used in the Thiele fits. If the directly computed forces disagree with the fitted ones, or if the bag's internal structure changes significantly during motion (for instance the inner skyrmions rearrange), the rigid-particle Thiele description is falsified. A simpler check: measure the dissipative tensor components and compare $D$ with $G$ for a $Q=\pm1$ skyrmion; if $D\not\approx G$, the simplified velocity formulas break down.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core claim is that an out-of-plane strain gradient exerts a force $F_{\rm strain}=-\nabla W_{\rm strain}$ on a skyrmion or skyrmion bag, and this force is large enough to dictate the direction of current-driven motion. For a $Q=-1$ skyrmion, a negative gradient parallel to the electron flow leaves the $V_x$ component nearly constant while making $V_y$ grow linearly; a gradient perpendicular to the flow decreases $V_x$ and, beyond about $\partial\epsilon_{zz}=-4.7\times10^{-4}\%$, makes the skyrmion move against the electron flow. For skyrmion bags $S(N)$, the same strain-gradient forces produce deflections that decrease as the topological charge increases, and the full Thiele model with a non-diagonal dissipative tensor reproduces the simulated velocities. The paper also shows that with $\alpha\neq\beta$ a positive parallel strain gradient can compensate the Magnus-force deflection, yielding straight-line motion at a particular gradient strength.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that a moving skyrmion or skyrmion bag behaves as a rigid particle whose shape and internal structure do not change, and that the strain-gradient force can be represented by a uniform force fitted to the velocities; if the texture deforms or the force is not actually uniform, the quantitative agreement with the Thiele equation and the proposed control scheme would not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Out-of-plane strain widens the stability window of skyrmions and bags, and raises the critical DMI below which single skyrmions are preferred over bags.
  • A parallel strain gradient gives linear control of transverse deflection; a perpendicular gradient can stop and reverse the direction of current-driven motion.
  • A strain gradient can cancel the skyrmion Hall effect at a specific strength, allowing straight-line propagation in a racetrack geometry.
  • Skyrmion bags with higher topological charge move slower under the same current and gradient, so topological charge can serve as a velocity or deflection tag.
  • Thiele-equation fits with a full dissipative tensor predict bag velocities that match simulation, giving a quantitative design rule for strain-gradient devices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The fitted force components are not computed from the micromagnetic energy landscape, so a direct test would be to evaluate $-\nabla W_{\rm strain}$ from the magnetization configuration and compare with the fitted values; if they mismatch, the simple uniform-force picture may need correction.
  • Because strain can be patterned locally, one could imagine routing individual skyrmions or bags along different tracks by writing spatial strain profiles, something the paper motivates but does not engineer.
  • The same mechanism may apply to other topological textures such as antiskyrmions or merons, where the sign of $Q$ would flip the deflection direction; the paper does not test this.
  • If bag deformation during motion is significant, the rigid-particle Thiele description would fail; monitoring inner-skyrmion rearrangements while moving would test whether the agreement is robust.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports micromagnetic simulations (MuMax3) of Néel skyrmions and skyrmion bags in a ferromagnetic thin film with perpendicular anisotropy, DMI, and an out-of-plane uniaxial strain term. Part I studies the total energy versus out-of-plane strain ε_zz for Q=±1 skyrmions and S(2), S(3), S(5) bags and constructs a DMI–ε_zz stability phase diagram. Part II studies current-induced dynamics under a linear strain gradient applied either parallel or perpendicular to the electron flow, reporting linear changes in velocity components and a demonstration that a suitable positive gradient cancels the skyrmion Hall effect for α≠β. The velocities are compared with solutions of the Thiele equation, and the authors claim good agreement.

Significance. If the strain-gradient control mechanism is quantitatively validated, it would provide a practical, low-dissipation method for steering skyrmions and skyrmion bags and for compensating the skyrmion Hall effect in racetrack geometries. The paper's strengths are the systematic parameter scans (ε_zz, DMI, gradient magnitude), the use of a full dissipative tensor computed from the simulated textures for skyrmion bags, and the clear demonstration of linear velocity–gradient relationships with topological-charge-dependent slopes. However, the central quantitative claim—that the simulations 'align well with theoretical predictions from the Thiele equation'—is not yet established because the strain force components in the Thiele fits are free parameters rather than computed from the energy landscape, and several material and gradient parameters are unreported.

major comments (5)
  1. [§III B, Figs. 2(e,f) and §III D, Fig. 5] The solid lines in Figs. 2(e,f) and 5 are described in the text and captions as fits to the simulated velocities using the Thiele equation. The force components Fx and Fy entering Eqs. (5)–(12) are not computed from the micromagnetic energy landscape via F_strain = −∇W; they are treated as adjustable parameters that reproduce the linear velocity–gradient data. As a result, the 'agreement' between the Thiele curves and the simulation symbols is not an independent test of the strain-force model, and the abstract's statement that the simulations 'align well with theoretical predictions' is stronger than the evidence supports. To turn this comparison into a prediction, the authors should either compute F_strain from the simulated W_strain with the stated material parameters or report the fitted Fx, Fy values and show that they are consistent with an independent estimate of the strain force.
  2. [§II, W_strain definition] The strain-energy term W_strain = −(3/2)ε_k λ (m·ẑ)^2 contains the Young's modulus k and magnetostriction constant λ, but the paper never assigns numerical values to these quantities, so the energy scale of the strain term and hence the magnitude of the force F_strain cannot be checked. Moreover, the strain gradient ∂ε_zz is reported only as a dimensionless percentage (e.g., −2.3 × 10⁻⁴ %), whereas a gradient requires a length unit (e.g., %/nm or 1/m). Without this information the simulations are not reproducible and the reported gradient values cannot be converted to the force used in the Thiele fits.
  3. [After Eq. (6)] The derivation of Eqs. (7)–(8) relies on the assertion 'assuming D ≡ G for skyrmion' together with small α. The dissipative tensor for the simulated Q = −1 skyrmion is not shown; the text only states that Dxx = Dyy = D was verified. For a finite-size skyrmion, D is generally not equal to G = 4π|Q|M_s t/γ, and the equality should be checked numerically for the actual relaxed texture. The authors should either report the computed D value and justify D ≈ G, or use the full coupled equations (5)–(6) with the actual D, as they already do for the skyrmion bags in Eqs. (9)–(12).
  4. [§III B, Q=+1 claim] The sentence 'Similar current induced dynamics were obtained for Q = +1 skyrmions (data not shown)' is an unsupported assertion. The paper's core claim is that strain-gradient deflection correlates with topological charge, so the Q = +1 case should be documented (at least one velocity–gradient panel or a quantitative statement of the fitted forces). As written, the missing data leave the generality of the results unverified.
  5. [§III D and Fig. 5] The Thiele comparison for skyrmion bags treats each bag as a rigid texture with constant dissipative tensor D and constant strain force F_strain. However, the manuscript does not quantify the deformation of the bags during current-driven motion: for example, whether the inner skyrmions remain fixed relative to the outer boundary or whether the outer boundary becomes elliptical. If the texture deforms, D and F_strain are time-dependent and the constant-parameter fits could still reproduce the average velocity. The authors should show snapshots at several times, quantify the deformation (e.g., the radial spread of inner skyrmions or the ellipticity of the outer boundary), and state whether the velocities in Fig. 5 are terminal or time-averaged.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§II] The text calls α the 'gyrocoupling damping parameter' and states that M_sat is 'in Tesla'; the standard terminology is Gilbert damping, and M_sat should be given in A/m consistently with the listed value 580 kA/m.
  2. [Figures 1, 2, 5] The figure axis labels in the arXiv version are partially garbled, making it difficult to read the units of ∂ε_zz and the velocity axes; the authors should regenerate the figures with clear labels that include units (e.g., m/s for velocity, %/nm for the gradient).
  3. [§II and §III A] The sign convention of W_strain and the physical meaning of positive ε_zz (compressive vs tensile) are not stated; this should be clarified because the stability results depend on the sign of the strain.
  4. [§III A] The symbol for the critical DMI is typeset inconsistently (e.g., 'Dc DMI' and 'D^c_DMI'); please unify the notation.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Thiele 'agreement' is obtained by fitting the strain force directly to the simulated velocities, so the claimed alignment is not an independent theoretical prediction.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section III B, Eqs. (5)-(8), Fig. 2(e,f) caption]
    "The solid line in FIG. 2(e,f) represents the fit to the simulated points(solid symbols) based on equation (7,8)."

    Equations (7)-(8) express v_x and v_y in terms of an unknown strain force (F_x,F_y), which is never computed from W_strain or material constants. The solid 'Thiele' curves are fits of this force to the very simulated velocities shown as symbols. Thus the statement that the simulations align with Thiele predictions is guaranteed by construction for linear velocity-versus-gradient data; it is not an independent prediction. The dissipative tensor D is computed from the texture, which is genuine, but the force magnitude remains a free fitting parameter.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section III D, Eqs. (9)-(12), Fig. 5 caption]
    "In FIG. 5, the solid lines are the fit to the simulated results using the above mentioned equations (9–12). The Thiele equation closely matches the simulated results for skyrmion bags."

    The same structure repeats for skyrmion bags: Eqs. (9)-(12) contain F_x and F_y that are fitted to the displayed simulation velocities. The 'close match' with the Thiele equation is therefore a curve-fit statement, not a derivation from first principles. Although the dissipative-tensor components are evaluated numerically, the strain force is not computed independently, so the agreement does not validate the strain-energy form or the rigid-body assumptions separately from the fitted parameters.

full rationale

The paper's central empirical findings—out-of-plane strain stabilizes skyrmions/skyrmion bags, and strain gradients deflect them or cancel the skyrmion Hall effect—are based on micromagnetic simulations and are self-contained; those trends do not reduce to the Thiele fit. However, the abstract and conclusion claim that the simulations 'align well with theoretical predictions from the Thiele equation,' and the figure captions explicitly state that the Thiele curves are fits to the simulated velocities using force terms F_x,F_y as fitted parameters. Since F_strain is never computed from the micromagnetic energy landscape, and the material constants k and λ entering W_strain are not assigned numerical values, the 'agreement' is partly a tautology: the model is matched to the data by construction. The independent content is limited to the linear functional form and to the numerically computed dissipative tensor, which is a real check but does not rescue the force-fit as a prediction. The unverified D≡G simplification and the unreported strain-gradient length scale are further weaknesses but are correctness concerns rather than additional circularity. Overall, the central validation claim reduces in part to a fit, warranting score 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a standard simulation package, a standard rigid-particle Thiele model, and several material and modeling assumptions. The strain force is fitted rather than derived, and the magnetostriction constants are unreported, so the reader cannot independently verify the quantitative dynamic predictions without contacting the authors.

free parameters (3)
  • Strain force components Fx, Fy in Thiele fits = not reported
    Fitted to simulated velocity vs strain-gradient curves in Figs. 2(e,f) and 5; the paper does not report the extracted values or compare them with the strain-energy derivative.
  • Young's modulus x magnetostriction product (k lambda) in Wstrain = not reported
    The strain energy term requires k and lambda; no numerical values are given, so the absolute energy scale and the strain force magnitude are not reproducible from the text.
  • Baseline out-of-plane strain epsilon0 = not reported
    Used in epsilon_zz(i)=epsilon0+depsilon*i for dynamic simulations; the value is never specified, so the absolute strain level in the dynamics section is unknown.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Thiele rigid-body approximation: skyrmions and skyrmion bags move as undeformed particles described by collective coordinates
    Eq. (4) and the velocity derivations assume a rigid texture; internal bag deformations and non-rigid modes are neglected.
  • domain assumption Strain energy density Wstrain = -3/2 epsilon k lambda (m.z)^2 (from Ostler et al.)
    Used in Sec. II without derivation; the functional form and sign determine both stability energy and the strain-gradient force.
  • domain assumption Material parameters (A=15 pJ/m, K=0.8 MJ/m3, D=3.5 mJ/m2, Ms=580 kA/m, P=0.4) taken from refs. [65,66] are appropriate for the modeled film
    All simulations use these values; results may be material-specific.
  • ad hoc to paper D equals G for skyrmion and alpha small
    Used to reduce Eqs. (5)-(6) to (7)-(8); no verification is provided that the simulated skyrmion satisfies D=G.
  • domain assumption Boundary effects are negligible because dynamics are tracked far from the edges
    The simulations and Thiele fits neglect the nanotrack boundary potential; this is stated but not quantified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stability and Dynamics of Skyrmion and Skyrmion Bags Explored under the Influence of Out-of-Plane Strain and Its Gradient." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NOENWUZR

@misc{pith2026241118332,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stability and Dynamics of Skyrmion and Skyrmion Bags Explored under the Influence of Out-of-Plane Strain and Its Gradient},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NOENWUZR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18332}
}
read the original abstract

Skyrmions as well as skyrmion bags in magnetic thin films are promising candidates for future high-density memory devices. The observation of skyrmion bags in liquid crystals and their predicted existence in ferromagnetic films has sparked theoretical studies on current induced dynamics of these topological charges. Here using micromagnetism, we study the impact of out of plane strain on the stability of skyrmion and skyrmion bags in ferromagnetic thin film. We further studied the current induced dynamics in the presence of out of plane strain gradient. We demonstrate that out of plane strain gradient direction with respect to the electron flow can be an efficient way to control the dynamics of topological charges. Specifically, the deflection of skyrmion bags correlates with their topological degree, and an appropriate strain gradient can counteract skyrmion Hall effects, enabling straight-line movement. Our micromagnetic simulations align well with theoretical predictions from the Thiele equation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.18332 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. a) Magnetization distribution for stable skyrmion and skyrmion bags in magnetic thin film at DMI = [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Current induced Dynamics of Q = -1 skyrmion for a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Current induced dynamics of skyrmion bags in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Killing of skyrmion hall effect with the application of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a,c) Velocity component Vx and Vy vs negative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Sampaio, V

    J. Sampaio, V. Cros, S. Rohart, A. Thiaville, and A. Fert, Nature nanotechnology8, 839 (2013)

    2013

  2. [2]

    A. Fert, N. Reyren, and V. Cros, Nature Reviews Mate- rials 2, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Nagaosa and Y

    N. Nagaosa and Y. Tokura, Nature nanotechnology8, 899 (2013)

    2013

  4. [4]

    U. K. Roessler, A. Bogdanov, and C. Pfleiderer, Nature 442, 797 (2006)

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    Maccariello, W

    D. Maccariello, W. Legrand, N. Reyren, K. Garcia, K. Bouzehouane, S. Collin, V. Cros, and A. Fert, Nature nanotechnology 13, 233 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    X. Wang, H. Yuan, and X. Wang, Communications Physics 1, 31 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Zhou, National Science Review6, 210 (2019)

    Y. Zhou, National Science Review6, 210 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Brataas and K

    A. Brataas and K. M. Hals, Nature nanotechnology9, 86 (2014)

    work page 2014

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    Telegin, M

    A. Telegin, M. Stebliy, A. Ognev, V. Bessonov, and S. Batalov, Indian Journal of Physics , 1 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    X. Yu, Y. Onose, N. Kanazawa, J. H. Park, J. Han, Y. Matsui, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Nature465, 901 (2010)

    2010

  3. [11]

    J. Zang, M. Mostovoy, J. H. Han, and N. Nagaosa, Phys- ical review letters107, 136804 (2011)

    2011

  4. [12]

    Komineas and N

    S. Komineas and N. Papanicolaou, Physical Review B 92, 064412 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    Jiang, G

    W. Jiang, G. Chen, K. Liu, J. Zang, S. G. Te Velthuis, and A. Hoffmann, Physics Reports704, 1 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    Kind and D

    C. Kind and D. Foster, Physical Review B103, L100413 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Y. Ji, S. Yang, H.-B. Ahn, K.-W. Moon, T.-S. Ju, M.-Y. Im, H.-S. Han, J. Lee, S.-y. Park, C. Lee,et al., Advanced Materials 36, 2312013 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    S. Woo, K. Litzius, B. Krüger, M.-Y. Im, L. Caretta, K. Richter, M. Mann, A. Krone, R. M. Reeve, M. Weigand,et al., Nature materials15, 501 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    Zhang, J

    Y. Zhang, J. Tang, Y. Wu, M. Shi, X. Xu, S. Wang, M. Tian, and H. Du, Nature Communications15, 3391 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Boulle, J

    O. Boulle, J. Vogel, H. Yang, S. Pizzini, D. de Souza Chaves, A. Locatelli, T. O. Menteş, A. Sala, L. D. Buda-Prejbeanu, O. Klein,et al., Nature nanotechnology 11, 449 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    Legrand, D

    W. Legrand, D. Maccariello, F. Ajejas, S. Collin, A. Vec- chiola, K. Bouzehouane, N. Reyren, V. Cros, and A. Fert, Nature materials19, 34 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    A. Fert, V. Cros, and J. Sampaio, Nature nanotechnology 8, 152 (2013)

    2013

  13. [21]

    Cortés-Ortuño, W

    D. Cortés-Ortuño, W. Wang, M. Beg, R. A. Pepper, M.- A. Bisotti, R. Carey, M. Vousden, T. Kluyver, O. Hov- orka, and H. Fangohr, Scientific reports7, 4060 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    Parkin and S.-H

    S. Parkin and S.-H. Yang, Nature nanotechnology10, 195 (2015)

    2015

  15. [23]

    Hagemeister, N

    J. Hagemeister, N. Romming, K. Von Bergmann, E. Vedmedenko, and R. Wiesendanger, Nature commu- nications 6, 8455 (2015)

    2015

  16. [24]

    D. M. Crum, M. Bouhassoune, J. Bouaziz, B. Schwefling- haus, S. Blügel, and S. Lounis, Nature communications 6, 8541 (2015)

    2015

  17. [25]

    Romming, C

    N. Romming, C. Hanneken, M. Menzel, J. E. Bickel, B. Wolter, K. von Bergmann, A. Kubetzka, and R. Wiesendanger, Science341, 636 (2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, K. M. Song, T.-E. Park, J. Xia, M. Ezawa, X. Liu, W. Zhao, G. Zhao, and S. Woo, Jour- nal of Physics: Condensed Matter32, 143001 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Karino, D

    T. Karino, D. Shimizu, A. P. Ohki, N. Ikarashi, T. Kato, D. Oshima, and M. Nagao, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.08527 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Zhang, M

    Z. Zhang, M. Xu, G. Jiang, J. Zhang, D. Meng, W. Chen, Y. Chen, and C. Hu, Journal of Applied Physics 132 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Z. Zeng, C. Zhang, C. Jin, J. Wang, C. Song, Y. Ma, Q.Liu,andJ.Wang,AppliedPhysicsLetters 117(2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    Foster, C

    D. Foster, C. Kind, P. J. Ackerman, J.-S. B. Tai, M. R. Dennis, and I. I. Smalyukh, Nature Physics 15, 655 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    J. Tang, Y. Wu, W. Wang, L. Kong, B. Lv, W. Wei, J. Zang, M. Tian, and H. Du, Nature Nanotechnology 16, 1086 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    L. Bo, R. Zhao, C. Hu, X. Zhang, X. Zhang, and M. Mochizuki, Physical Review B107, 224431 (2023). 8

    2023

  25. [33]

    C. Kind, S. Friedemann, and D. Read, Applied Physics Letters 116 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    M. Xu, X. Zhao, J. Ning, Y. Wang, Z. Zhang, W. Chen, C. Hu, and Y. Chen, Journal of Applied Physics 136 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    X. Bai, J. Wang, J. Yang, H. Liu, S. Zhang, and Q. Liu, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 586, 171231 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    Chen, Nature Physics13, 112 (2017)

    G. Chen, Nature Physics13, 112 (2017)

    2017

  29. [37]

    Jiang, X

    W. Jiang, X. Zhang, G. Yu, W. Zhang, X. Wang, M. Ben- jamin Jungfleisch, J. E. Pearson, X. Cheng, O. Heinonen, K. L. Wang,et al., Nature Physics13, 162 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    Aldarawsheh, M

    A. Aldarawsheh, M. Sallermann, M. Abusaa, and S. Lou- nis, npj Spintronics2, 41 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Zhang, G

    X. Zhang, G. Wan, J. Zhang, Y.-F. Zhang, J. Pan, and S. Du, Nano Letters24, 10796 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    L. Bo, X. Zhang, M. Mochizuki, and X. Zhang, Physical Review Research6, 023199 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Stone, Physical Review B53, 16573 (1996)

    M. Stone, Physical Review B53, 16573 (1996)

    1996

  34. [42]

    Ehlers, I

    D. Ehlers, I. Stasinopoulos, V. Tsurkan, H.-A. Krug von Nidda, T. Fehér, A. Leonov, I. Kézsmárki, D. Grundler, and A. Loidl, Physical Review B94, 014406 (2016)

    2016

  35. [43]

    I. R. de Assis, I. Mertig, and B. Göbel, Physical Review B 108, 144438 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Tomasello, S

    R. Tomasello, S. Komineas, G. Siracusano, M. Carpen- tieri, and G. Finocchio, Physical Review B98, 024421 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    H. Xia, C. Song, C. Jin, J. Wang, J. Wang, and Q. Liu, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials458, 57 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    Z. Zeng, N. Mehmood, Y. Ma, J. Wang, J. Wang, and Q.Liu,JournalofPhysics: CondensedMatter 34,395801 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Litzius, J

    K. Litzius, J. Leliaert, P. Bassirian, D. Rodrigues, S. Kromin, I. Lemesh, J. Zazvorka, K.-J. Lee, J. Mulkers, N. Kerber, et al., Nature Electronics3, 30 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    Kong and J

    L. Kong and J. Zang, Physical review letters111, 067203 (2013)

    2013

  41. [49]

    Iwasaki, M

    J. Iwasaki, M. Mochizuki, and N. Nagaosa, Nature nan- otechnology 8, 742 (2013)

    2013

  42. [50]

    X. Chen, W. Kang, D. Zhu, X. Zhang, N. Lei, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhou, and W. Zhao, Applied Physics Letters 111 (2017)

    2017

  43. [51]

    Y. Liu, X. Huo, S. Xuan, and H. Yan, Journal of Mag- netism and Magnetic Materials492, 165659 (2019)

    2019

  44. [52]

    C. Feng, F. Meng, Y. Wang, J. Jiang, N. Mehmood, Y. Cao, X. Lv, F. Yang, L. Wang, Y. Zhao,et al., Ad- vanced Functional Materials31, 2008715 (2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    Budhathoki, A

    S. Budhathoki, A. Sapkota, K. M. Law, S. Ranjit, B. Nepal, B. D. Hoskins, A. S. Thind, A. Y. Borisevich, M. E. Jamer, T. J. Anderson,et al., Physical Review B 101, 220405 (2020)

    2020

  46. [54]

    J. Wang, Y. Shi, and M. Kamlah, Physical Review B97, 024429 (2018)

    2018

  47. [55]

    Shi and J

    Y. Shi and J. Wang, Physical Review B 97, 224428 (2018)

    2018

  48. [56]

    J.-M. Hu, T. Yang, and L.-Q. Chen, npj Computational Materials 4, 62 (2018)

    2018

  49. [57]

    Z. Li, Y. Zhang, Y. Huang, C. Wang, X. Zhang, Y. Liu, Y. Zhou, W. Kang, S. C. Koli, and N. Lei, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials455, 19 (2018)

    2018

  50. [58]

    S. Seki, Y. Okamura, K. Shibata, R. Takagi, N. Khanh, F. Kagawa, T. Arima, and Y. Tokura, Physical Review B 96, 220404 (2017)

    2017

  51. [59]

    Yanes, F

    R. Yanes, F. Garcia-Sanchez, R. Luis, E. Martinez, V. Raposo, L. Torres, and L. Lopez-Diaz, Applied Physics Letters115 (2019)

    2019

  52. [60]

    Fattouhi, F

    M. Fattouhi, F. García-Sánchez, R. Yanes, V. Raposo, E. Martínez, and L. Lopez-Diaz, Physical Review Ap- plied 16, 044035 (2021)

    2021

  53. [61]

    J. Wang, Y. Ma, H. Liu, Y. Yuan, J. Yang, S. Zhang, J.Wang,andQ.Liu,AppliedPhysicsLetters 123(2023)

    2023

  54. [62]

    Vansteenkiste, J

    A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garcia-Sanchez, and B. Van Waeyenberge, AIP ad- vances4 (2014)

    2014

  55. [63]

    Ostler, R

    T. Ostler, R. Cuadrado, R. Chantrell, A. Rushforth, and S. Cavill, Physical review letters115, 067202 (2015)

    2015

  56. [64]

    Zhang and Z

    S. Zhang and Z. Li, Physical review letters93, 127204 (2004)

    2004

  57. [65]

    Metaxas, J

    P. Metaxas, J. Jamet, A. Mougin, M. Cormier, J. Ferré, V.Baltz, B.Rodmacq, B.Dieny,andR.Stamps,Physical review letters99, 217208 (2007)

    2007

  58. [66]

    McSkimin, Journal of Applied Physics26, 406 (1955)

    H. McSkimin, Journal of Applied Physics26, 406 (1955)

    1955

  59. [67]

    Zhang, G

    X. Zhang, G. Zhao, H. Fangohr, J. P. Liu, W. Xia, J. Xia, and F. Morvan, Scientific reports5, 7643 (2015)

    2015

  60. [68]

    Thiele, Physical Review Letters30, 230 (1973)

    A. Thiele, Physical Review Letters30, 230 (1973)

    1973

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.