Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Progress on the spectroscopy of an Sp(4) gauge theory coupled to matter in multiple representations

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Sp(4) lattice spectra now include chimera baryons and excited states

desk verdict First fully dynamical Sp(4) multi-representation spectra, including chimera baryons of both parities; solid but preliminary, with a real caveat about inherited parity/spin projections. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18379 v1 pith:OVF43B7G submitted 2024-11-27 hep-lat hep-ph

Ho Hsiao , Ed Bennett , Niccolò Forzano , Deog Ki Hong , Jong-Wan Lee , C.-J. David Lin , Biagio Lucini , Maurizio Piai
show 2 more authors
Davide Vadacchino Fabian Zierler
This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-lathep-ph
keywords Sp(4)gaugetheorycompositeHiggschimerabaryonspartialcompositenesslatticespectroscopygeneralisedeigenvalueproblemmultiplefermionrepresentationsWilsonfermions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports progress toward computing the spectrum of an $\mathrm{Sp}(4)$ gauge theory coupled to two Dirac fermion flavours in the fundamental representation and three in the two-index antisymmetric representation, a candidate ultraviolet completion of a composite Higgs model. The authors measure flavoured mesons, the flavour-singlet pseudoscalar, and chimera baryons—states built from two fundamental and one antisymmetric hyperquark—on fully dynamical ensembles. They claim that, in the available region of parameter space, Wuppertal and APE smearing combined with an optimised generalised eigenvalue problem gives access to a wide variety of these bound states, including both parities of the chimera baryons and, where possible, excited states. The chimera baryon masses are the key new outputs, since they are the masses needed to implement top partial compositeness in the composite Higgs model.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is a signal-extraction pipeline built from Wuppertal fermion smearing, APE gauge-field smearing, and a generalised eigenvalue problem (GEVP) that diagonalises a basis of two-point correlation functions built from operators with different smearing levels. For the chimera baryons the interpolating operators are the two-fundamental-one-antisymmetric hyperquark bilinears of Eqs. (1)–(2), with parity and spin projections taken from the earlier quenched study that separate the spin-$\tfrac12$ states $\Lambda_{\rm CB}$, $\Sigma_{\rm CB}$ from the spin-$\tfrac32$ state $\Sigma^\ast_{\rm CB}$ and from opposite-parity contamination. The GEVP turns the raw correlators into effective-mass plateaus and excited-state energies, and all masses are expressed in units of the gradient flow scale $w_0$.

What would settle it

Compute the same chimera-baryon channels on ensembles M2, M4, and M5 with an independent operator basis, for example operators containing covariant derivatives or different gamma-matrix structures, and see whether the GEVP ground-state energies reproduce the quoted values; if adding a spin-$\tfrac32$ operator to the $\Lambda_{\rm CB}$ basis shifts its lowest eigenvalue by more than the quoted uncertainty, the projection is contaminated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the fully dynamical $\mathrm{Sp}(4)$ theory with matter in two representations is now amenable to detailed spectroscopy with present simulation technology. On the five ensembles listed in Table 1, built with Wilson fermions and the Wilson plaquette action at inverse coupling $\beta=6.5$, the combination of Wuppertal smearing, APE smearing, and a GEVP analysis over operators with different smearing levels extracts stable effective masses for pseudoscalar, vector, tensor, axial-vector, axial-tensor, and scalar mesons in both the fundamental and antisymmetric sectors, for the flavour-singlet $\eta'$ state, and for the chimera baryons $\Lambda_{\rm CB}$, $\Sigma_{\rm CB}$, and $\Sigma^\ast_{\rm CB}$ in both parity channels, with excited states where accessible. The spectrum plots from ensembles M2, M4, and M5 show the parity-even chimera baryons lighter than their parity-odd partners. These masses, expressed in units of the gradient flow scale $w_0$, are presented as the inputs needed for composite Higgs model building and, in particular, for top partial compositeness.

Load-bearing premise

The chimera-baryon results rest on the assumption that the parity and spin projections applied to the interpolating operators really do isolate the spin-$\tfrac12$ and spin-$\tfrac32$ states from opposite-parity and higher-spin contaminants, a separation the paper supports only by the flatness of the effective-mass plateaus.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, the fully dynamical $\mathrm{Sp}(4)$ theory with two fundamental and three antisymmetric fermions becomes a calculable ultraviolet completion for composite Higgs models, and its spectrum can be systematically improved toward the continuum and massless limits.
  • The $\Lambda_{\rm CB}$ and $\Sigma_{\rm CB}$ masses, identified as top-partner candidates, can serve as direct lattice inputs to phenomenological models of top partial compositeness.
  • The validated smearing-plus-GEVP analysis can be extended from ground-state masses to off-shell observables, such as spectral densities and matrix elements, which the authors identify as the next step.
  • Quenching effects on the meson sector, estimated at roughly 10% for vector and 25% for scalar mesons, can now be quantified against the fully dynamical results rather than against partially quenched ones.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the parity and spin projections are as clean as the effective-mass plateaus suggest, the same operator basis could be adapted to compute chimera-baryon transition matrix elements—the quantity ultimately needed to turn top partial compositeness into a quantitative prediction for the top-quark mass.
  • A direct comparison of these dynamical chimera baryon masses with the earlier quenched results would quantify how the antisymmetric-fermion sea shifts the fermionic bound states; the paper does not yet make that comparison.
  • Because the analysis pipeline is representation-agnostic, the same smearing-and-GEVP strategy should transfer to other $\mathrm{Sp}(2N)$ gauge theories used in dark matter model building, where only quenched or partially dynamical spectra are currently available.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This proceedings paper reports progress on the lattice spectroscopy of the Sp(4) gauge theory coupled to two fundamental and three two-index antisymmetric Dirac fermions, a setup relevant for composite Higgs models with top partial compositeness. The paper reviews earlier quenched and partially dynamical results from the TELOS collaboration and then presents preliminary fully dynamical spectra obtained on five ensembles (M1-M5), with emphasis on the use of Wuppertal smearing, APE smearing, and a GEVP analysis. The central claim, stated in Section 4, is that this combination of techniques gives access to a wide variety of bound states, including flavored mesons with several quantum numbers, chimera baryons of both parities, and excited states. The new results are presented mainly through effective-mass plots for chimera baryons on ensemble M5 (Fig. 2) and summary spectra for M2, M4, and M5 (Figs. 6-8).

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a valuable step forward for lattice studies of composite Higgs models with matter in multiple representations, and specifically for the mass inputs needed for top partial compositeness. The paper benefits from a clear ensemble table with explicit simulation parameters, the use of the gradient-flow scale w0 for scale setting, a cross-check of smearing against wall sources (though on earlier ensembles), and transparent statements that the analysis is preliminary. The effective-mass plateaus in Fig. 2 for all six chimera ground-state channels are a concrete positive result. The main weaknesses are the lack of an independent validation of the chimera parity/spin projections on the new dynamical ensembles, and the absence of numerical tables or visible uncertainties for the spectra in Figs. 6-8, which are the direct evidence for the paper's broadest claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, Eqs. (1)-(2); Figs. 2 and 6-8] The parity and spin projections for the chimera baryon operators are taken from Ref. [12] and are not independently validated on the new fully dynamical ensembles M2, M4, and M5. The central claim in Section 4 that the analysis gives access to chimera baryons "of both parities" depends on these projections correctly separating Lambda_CB, Sigma_CB, and Sigma*_CB from opposite-parity and spin-3/2 contamination. Since the ensembles used here have two dynamical fermion representations, which is a different regime from the quenched ensembles of Ref. [12], the paper should provide a check on the new ensembles: for example, effective-mass plateaus for all six chimera channels on more than one ensemble, a comparison of masses obtained from independent projections, or evidence that the GEVP eigenvectors do not mix parity/spin sectors. Without such a check, the "both parities" part of the central claim is not fully demonstrated.
  2. [Figs. 6-8] The spectra in Figs. 6-8 are presented without numerical tables and, as printed, without visible error bars for most states. Since Section 4 claims that the method allows access to a wide variety of excited states and chimera baryons of both parities, the reader cannot assess whether the E0, E1, and E2 entries are statistically meaningful or whether the excited-state identifications are resolved. Please include a table of aE_n values with statistical errors for each state on M2, M4, and M5, or provide representative effective-mass plots for the new meson sectors in addition to the chimera sector shown in Fig. 2.
  3. [Section 2, Fig. 1] The wall-versus-smearing consistency check is performed on the ensembles of Ref. [3], where only fundamental-representation fermions are dynamical, and not on the fully dynamical two-representation ensembles M1-M5. This does not invalidate the method, since smearing and GEVP are numerical techniques that should transfer, but the text should state explicitly that the strategy is assumed to transfer to the new ensembles, or show a similar check on at least one of the new ensembles.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 1] The quoted statistical errors are not accompanied by a description of the binning or autocorrelation analysis; a sentence on how the errors are estimated would improve reproducibility.
  2. [Fig. 2] The effective masses are shown only for ensemble M5; the text says results are obtained for M2, M4, and M5, so please state why similar plots for M2 and M4 are not included, or add them.
  3. [Section 2, Eqs. (1)-(2)] The notation O5 and O_mu for the chimera operators could be confused with the meson labels S and V; consider a different naming or an explicit statement of the correspondence.
  4. [References] Reference [64] is listed as "in preparation"; if it is used as a source for meson spectroscopy with antisymmetric fermions, please update it to a preprint or publication when available.
  5. [Research Data Access Statement] The statement that data will be released with an upcoming publication is reasonable, but including the numerical values of the spectra shown in Figs. 6-8, even as a supplementary table, would make this proceedings contribution substantially more useful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: reported masses are direct lattice measurements with independent scale setting; self-citations are methodological, not load-bearing reductions.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a measurement chain, not a derivation of predictions from fitted inputs. Masses are extracted as GEVP eigenvalues of two-point correlation functions (Section 2, Fig. 2), with the scale set by the gradient-flow quantity w0, which is independent of the hadron masses quoted. The only internal comparison, Fig. 1, checks smeared against wall-source masses and finds compatibility, but this is not a parameter tuned to reproduce the reported spectrum. The chimera-baryon parity and spin projections are taken from Ref. [12], a same-group prior paper, but this is a methodological citation: the operators and projections are defined there, while the new dynamical ensemble results are independent measurements shown as effective-mass plateaus and GEVP energy levels. There is no equation in the paper in which an output mass equals an input by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The sceptical concern about validating the parity/spin separation on the new ensembles is a correctness risk, not circularity: even if the identification later proved wrong, the reported correlator eigenvalues would not be logically forced by the input assumptions. Accordingly no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is a measurement claim; it rests on standard lattice discretisation and scale-setting assumptions, on the reliability of the GEVP/smearing extraction, and on the quantum-number projections for chimera baryons. No new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in this paper; the analysis choices (smearing levels, fit ranges) are methodological details that will be documented in the final publication.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Wilson plaquette action and unimproved Wilson fermions define a local, unitary lattice discretisation whose continuum limit is the target Sp(4) gauge theory.
    Used in Section 2 for all ensembles; standard lattice QCD assumption, not proven here.
  • domain assumption The gradient flow scale w0, with the measured values w0/a listed in Table 1, provides a valid physical scale.
    Masses are reported in units of w0; scale-setting procedure follows Refs. [44-47].
  • domain assumption Parity and spin projections applied to the chimera baryon operators isolate the desired positive-parity spin-1/2 and spin-3/2 states.
    Section 2, details deferred to Ref. [12]; no in-paper validation on the new ensembles.
  • domain assumption The GEVP with three levels of smearing yields reliable ground and excited state energies within the fitted time windows.
    Section 2 and Fig. 2; assumes the operator basis is complete enough and the time windows are asymptotic.
  • domain assumption The SU(4)/Sp(4) breaking pattern and the interpretation of chimera baryons as top partners motivate the calculation.
    Section 1, Refs. [34,38,50,51]; relevant for the model context, not for the lattice measurement itself.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Progress on the spectroscopy of an Sp(4) gauge theory coupled to matter in multiple representations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OVF43B7G

@misc{pith2026241118379,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Progress on the spectroscopy of an Sp(4) gauge theory coupled to matter in multiple representations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OVF43B7G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18379}
}
read the original abstract

We report progress on our lattice calculations for the mass spectra of low-lying composite states in the Sp(4) gauge theory coupled to two and three flavors of Dirac fermions transforming in the fundamental and the two-index antisymmetric representations, respectively. This theory provides an ultraviolet completion to the composite Higgs model with Goldstone modes in the SU(4)/Sp(4) coset and with partial compositeness for generating the top-quark mass. We measure the meson and chimera baryon masses. These masses are crucial for constructing the composite Higgs model. In particular, the chimera baryon masses are important inputs for implementing top partial compositeness. We employ Wilson fermions and the Wilson plaquette action in our simulations. Techniques such as APE and Wuppertal smearing, as well as the procedure of generalised eigenvalue problem, are implemented in our analysis.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.18379 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of pseudoscalar (upper panel) and vector (lower panel) meson masses composed of (f) hyperquarks, extracted from correlation functions using wall sources and smearing techniques. The measurements are performed on ensembles with (f)-type dynamical fermions taken from Ref. [3], from which we borrow the conventional naming of the individual ensembles (the horizontal axis). Data points from the same ensemble a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Effective mass plot of chimera baryon masses, measured in the ensemble M5 listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The mass spectrum in the massless and continuum limits of the 𝑆 𝑝(4) gauge theory computed in the quenched approximation. Pseudoscalar, vector, tensor, axial-vector, axial-tensor and scalar mesons composed of fundamental (antisymmetric) hyperquarks are denoted as PS (ps), V (v), T(t), AV (av), AT (at) and S (s), respectively. We denote as ΛCB, ΣCB, and Σ ∗ CB the lightest, parity-even chimera baryons. Glueball state… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mass dependence of the chimera baryons, in the continuum limit, as a function of the mass squared of the pseudoscalars, 𝑚ˆ 2 PS (left) and 𝑚ˆ 2 ps (right). This figure is taken from Ref. [12]. measurement techniques in a resource-efficient way and establish benchmarks …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of quenched (blue) and dynamical (red) calculations for the extrapolations of the squared masses of flavored vector (V), axial-vector (AV), and scalar (S) mesons composed of (f)-type hyperquarks, plotted as a function of the (f) pseudoscalar (PS) meson mass …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The mass spectrum of all accessible flavored and flavor-singlet mesons, and of chimera baryons of both parities, including, where possible, also excited states, measured in ensemble M2 in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The mass spectrum of all accessible flavored and flavor-singlet mesons, and of chimera baryons of both parities, including, where possible, also excited states, measured in ensemble M4 in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The mass spectrum of all accessible flavored and flavor-singlet mesons, and of chimera baryons of both parities, including, where possible, also excited states, measured in ensemble M5 in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Meson spectroscopy in the $Sp(4)$ gauge theory with three antisymmetric fermions

    hep-lat 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Lattice simulations of Sp(4) with three antisymmetric Dirac fermions find QCD-like confinement and chiral symmetry breaking, and provide a first continuum-extrapolated meson spectrum.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [12]

    Bennett, D.K

    E. Bennett, D.K. Hong, H. Hsiao, J.-W. Lee, C.J.D. Lin, B. Lucini et al.,Lattice investigations of the chimera baryon spectrum in the Sp(4) gauge theory,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 094512 [2311.14663]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [3]

    Bennett, D.K

    E. Bennett, D.K. Hong, J.-W. Lee, C.J.D. Lin, B. Lucini, M. Piai et al.,Sp(4) gauge theories on the lattice: 𝑁𝑓 = 2 dynamical fundamental fermions,JHEP12 (2019) 053 [1909.12662]

    arXiv 2019

  3. [1]

    Panico and A

    G. Panico and A. Wulzer,The Composite Nambu-Goldstone Higgs, 1506.01961

    arXiv

  4. [2]

    Bennett, D.K

    E. Bennett, D.K. Hong, J.-W. Lee, C.J.D. Lin, B. Lucini, M. Piai et al.,Sp(4) gauge theory on the lattice: towards SU(4)/Sp(4) composite Higgs (and beyond),JHEP03 (2018) 185 [1712.04220]

    arXiv 2018

  5. [4]

    Bennett, D.K

    E. Bennett, D.K. Hong, J.-W. Lee, C.-J.D. Lin, B. Lucini, M. Mesiti et al.,𝑆𝑝(4) gauge theories on the lattice: quenched fundamental and antisymmetric fermions,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 074516 [1912.06505]

    arXiv 2020

  6. [5]

    Bennett, J

    E. Bennett, J. Holligan, D.K. Hong, J.-W. Lee, C.J.D. Lin, B. Lucini et al.,Color dependence of tensor and scalar glueball masses in Yang-Mills theories,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 011501 [2004.11063]

    arXiv 2020

  7. [6]

    Bennett, J

    E. Bennett, J. Holligan, D.K. Hong, J.-W. Lee, C.J.D. Lin, B. Lucini et al.,Glueballs and strings in𝑆𝑝(2𝑁) Yang-Mills theories,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 054509 [2010.15781]

    arXiv 2021

  8. [7]

    Bennett, D.K

    E. Bennett, D.K. Hong, H. Hsiao, J.-W. Lee, C.J.D. Lin, B. Lucini et al.,Lattice studies of the Sp(4) gauge theory with two fundamental and three antisymmetric Dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 014501 [2202.05516]

    arXiv 2022

Show all 64 references
  1. [8]

    Bennett, D.K

    E. Bennett, D.K. Hong, J.-W. Lee, C.J.D. Lin, B. Lucini, M. Piai et al.,Color dependence of the topological susceptibility in Yang-Mills theories,Phys. Lett. B835(2022) 137504 [2205.09254]

    2022 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Bennett, D.K

    E. Bennett, D.K. Hong, J.-W. Lee, C.J.D. Lin, B. Lucini, M. Piai et al.,Sp(2N) Yang-Mills theories on the lattice: Scale setting and topology,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 094503 [2205.09364]

    2022 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Bennett, J

    E. Bennett, J. Holligan, D.K. Hong, H. Hsiao, J.-W. Lee, C.J.D. Lin et al.,Sp(2N) Lattice Gauge Theories and Extensions of the Standard Model of Particle Physics,Universe9 (2023) 236 [2304.01070]. 9 Progress on the spectroscopy of Sp(4) gauge theory with matter in multiple rep...

    2023 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Bennett et al.,Symplectic lattice gauge theories in the grid framework: Approaching the conformal window, Phys

    E. Bennett et al.,Symplectic lattice gauge theories in the grid framework: Approaching the conformal window, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 094508 [2306.11649]

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Bennett, J

    E. Bennett, J. Holligan, D.K. Hong, J.-W. Lee, C.J.D. Lin, B. Lucini et al.,Spectrum of mesons in quenched Sp(2N) gauge theories,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 094517 [2312.08465]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Bennett et al.,Meson spectroscopy from spectral densities in lattice gauge theories,Phys

    E. Bennett et al.,Meson spectroscopy from spectral densities in lattice gauge theories,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 074509 [2405.01388]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Bennett, N

    E. Bennett, N. Forzano, D.K. Hong, H. Hsiao, J.-W. Lee, C.J.D. Lin et al.,On the mixing between flavor singlets in lattice gauge theories coupled to matter fields in multiple representations, Phys. Rev. D(2024) [2405.05765]

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Kulkarni, A

    S. Kulkarni, A. Maas, S. Mee, M. Nikolic, J. Pradler and F. Zierler,Low-energy effective description of dark 𝑆𝑝(4) theories,SciPost Phys.14(2023) 044 [2202.05191]

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Bennett, H

    E. Bennett, H. Hsiao, J.-W. Lee, B. Lucini, A. Maas, M. Piai et al.,Singlets in gauge theories with fundamental matter, Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 034504 [2304.07191]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Dengler, A

    Y. Dengler, A. Maas and F. Zierler,Scattering of dark pions in Sp(4) gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 054513 [2405.06506]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Bennett, B

    E. Bennett, B. Lucini, D. Mason, M. Piai, E. Rinaldi and D. Vadacchino,The density of states method for symplectic gauge theories at finite temperature, 2409.19426

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    Kaplan,Flavor at SSC energies: A New mechanism for dynamically generated fermion masses,Nucl

    D.B. Kaplan,Flavor at SSC energies: A New mechanism for dynamically generated fermion masses,Nucl. Phys. B365(1991) 259

    1991

  13. [21]

    DeGrand, D

    T.A. DeGrand, D. Hackett, W.I. Jay, E.T. Neil, Y. Shamir and B. Svetitsky,Towards Partial Compositeness on the Lattice: Baryons with Fermions in Multiple Representations,PoSLATTICE2016(2016) 219 [1610.06465]

    2016 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Ayyar, T

    V. Ayyar, T. DeGrand, M. Golterman, D.C. Hackett, W.I. Jay, E.T. Neil et al.,Spectroscopy of SU(4) composite Higgs theory with two distinct fermion representations,Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 074505 [1710.00806]

    2018 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Ayyar, T

    V. Ayyar, T. DeGrand, D.C. Hackett, W.I. Jay, E.T. Neil, Y. Shamir et al.,Chiral Transition of SU(4) Gauge Theory with Fermions in Multiple Representations,EPJ Web Conf.175(2018) 08026 [1709.06190]

    2018 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Ayyar, D

    V. Ayyar, D. Hackett, W. Jay and E. Neil,Confinement study of an SU(4) gauge theory with fermions in multiple representations, EPJ Web Conf.175(2018) 08025 [1710.03257]

    2018 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Ayyar, T

    V. Ayyar, T. DeGrand, D.C. Hackett, W.I. Jay, E.T. Neil, Y. Shamir et al.,Finite-temperature phase structure of SU(4) gauge theory with multiple fermion representations,Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 114502 [1802.09644]

    2018 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Ayyar, T

    V. Ayyar, T. Degrand, D.C. Hackett, W.I. Jay, E.T. Neil, Y. Shamir et al.,Baryon spectrum of SU(4) composite Higgs theory with two distinct fermion representations,Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 114505 [1801.05809]

    2018 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Cossu, L

    G. Cossu, L. Del Debbio, M. Panero and D. Preti,Strong dynamics with matter in multiple representations: SU(4) gauge theory with fundamental and sextet fermions,Eur. Phys. J. C79 (2019) 638 [1904.08885]

    2019 arXiv

  20. [28]

    A. Lupo, M. Panero, N. Tantalo and L. Del Debbio,Spectral reconstruction in SU(4) gauge theory with fermions in multiple representations,PoSLATTICE2021(2022) 092 [2112.01158]

    2022 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Del Debbio, A

    L. Del Debbio, A. Lupo, M. Panero and N. Tantalo,Multi-representation dynamics of SU(4) composite Higgs models: chiral limit and spectral reconstructions,Eur. Phys. J. C83 (2023) 220 [2211.09581]. 10 Progress on the spectroscopy of Sp(4) gauge theory with matter in multiple re...

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Golterman, W.I

    M. Golterman, W.I. Jay, E.T. Neil, Y. Shamir and B. Svetitsky,Low-energy constant𝐿10 in a two-representation lattice theory,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 074509 [2010.01920]

    2021 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Hasenfratz, E.T

    A. Hasenfratz, E.T. Neil, Y. Shamir, B. Svetitsky and O. Witzel,Infrared fixed point and anomalous dimensions in a composite Higgs model, Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 114504 [2304.11729]

    2023 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Bergner and S

    G. Bergner and S. Piemonte,Lattice simulations of a gauge theory with mixed adjoint-fundamental matter,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 014503 [2008.02855]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Bergner and S

    G. Bergner and S. Piemonte,Mixed adjoint-fundamental matter and applications towards SQCD and beyond,PoS LATTICE2021(2022) 242 [2111.15335]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Barnard, T

    J. Barnard, T. Gherghetta and T.S. Ray,UV descriptions of composite Higgs models without elementary scalars, JHEP02(2014) 002 [1311.6562]

    2014 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Kaplan and H

    D.B. Kaplan and H. Georgi,SU(2) x U(1) Breaking by Vacuum Misalignment, Phys. Lett. B136(1984) 183

    1984

  28. [36]

    Georgi and D.B

    H. Georgi and D.B. Kaplan,Composite Higgs and Custodial SU(2), Phys. Lett. B145 (1984) 216

    1984

  29. [37]

    Dugan, H

    M.J. Dugan, H. Georgi and D.B. Kaplan,Anatomy of a Composite Higgs Model,Nucl. Phys. B254(1985) 299

    1985

  30. [38]

    Ferretti and D

    G. Ferretti and D. Karateev,Fermionic UV completions of Composite Higgs models,JHEP03 (2014) 077 [1312.5330]

    2014 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Ferretti,Gauge theories of Partial Compositeness: Scenarios for Run-II of the LHC,JHEP06 (2016) 107 [1604.06467]

    G. Ferretti,Gauge theories of Partial Compositeness: Scenarios for Run-II of the LHC,JHEP06 (2016) 107 [1604.06467]

    2016 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Cacciapaglia, G

    G. Cacciapaglia, G. Ferretti, T. Flacke and H. Serôdio,Light scalars in composite Higgs models,Front. in Phys.7 (2019) 22 [1902.06890]

    2019 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Cacciapaglia, C

    G. Cacciapaglia, C. Pica and F. Sannino,Fundamental Composite Dynamics: A Review,Phys. Rept.877(2020) 1 [2002.04914]

    2020 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Duane, A.D

    S. Duane, A.D. Kennedy, B.J. Pendleton and D. Roweth,Hybrid Monte Carlo, Phys. Lett. B195 (1987) 216

    1987

  35. [43]

    Clark and A.D

    M.A. Clark and A.D. Kennedy,Accelerating dynamical fermion computations using the rational hybrid Monte Carlo (RHMC) algorithm with multiple pseudofermion fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.98 (2007) 051601 [hep-lat/0608015]

    2007 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Lüscher,Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD,JHEP08 (2010) 071 [1006.4518]

    M. Lüscher,Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD,JHEP08 (2010) 071 [1006.4518]

    2010 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Luscher and P

    M. Luscher and P. Weisz,Perturbative analysis of the gradient flow in non-abelian gauge theories, JHEP02 (2011) 051 [1101.0963]

    2011 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Lüscher,Future applications of the Yang-Mills gradient flow in lattice QCD,PoSLATTICE2013(2014) 016 [1308.5598]

    M. Lüscher,Future applications of the Yang-Mills gradient flow in lattice QCD,PoSLATTICE2013(2014) 016 [1308.5598]

    2014 arXiv

  39. [47]

    BMWcollaboration, High-precision scale setting in lattice QCD,JHEP09 (2012) 010 [1203.4469]

    2012 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Del Debbio, A

    L. Del Debbio, A. Patella and C. Pica,Higher representations on the lattice: Numerical simulations. SU(2) with adjoint fermions,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 094503 [0805.2058]

    2010 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Boyle, A

    P. Boyle, A. Yamaguchi, G. Cossu and A. Portelli,Grid: A next generation data parallel C++ QCD library, 12, 2015

    2015

  42. [50]

    Gripaios, A

    B. Gripaios, A. Pomarol, F. Riva and J. Serra,Beyond the Minimal Composite Higgs Model, JHEP04 (2009) 070 [0902.1483]. 11 Progress on the spectroscopy of Sp(4) gauge theory with matter in multiple representationsHo Hsiao

    2009 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Banerjee, D.B

    A. Banerjee, D.B. Franzosi and G. Ferretti,Modelling vector-like quarks in partial compositeness framework, JHEP03(2022) 200 [2202.00037]

    2022 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Boyle, A

    P.A. Boyle, A. Juttner, C. Kelly and R.D. Kenway,Use of stochastic sources for the lattice determination of light quark physics, JHEP08(2008) 086 [0804.1501]

    2008 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Gusken,A Study of smearing techniques for hadron correlation functions,Nucl

    S. Gusken,A Study of smearing techniques for hadron correlation functions,Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.17(1990) 361

    1990

  46. [54]

    APEcollaboration, Glueball Masses and String Tension in Lattice QCD,Phys. Lett. B192(1987) 163

    1987

  47. [55]

    Martinelli and Y.-C

    G. Martinelli and Y.-C. Zhang,The Connection Between Local Operators on the Lattice and in the Continuum and Its Relation to Meson Decay Constants,Phys. Lett. B123(1983) 433

    1983

  48. [56]

    Lepage and P.B

    G.P. Lepage and P.B. Mackenzie,On the viability of lattice perturbation theory,Phys. Rev. D48 (1993) 2250 [hep-lat/9209022]

    1993 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Sheikholeslami and R

    B. Sheikholeslami and R. Wohlert,Improved Continuum Limit Lattice Action for QCD with Wilson Fermions, Nucl. Phys. B259(1985) 572

    1985

  50. [58]

    G.RupakandN.Shoresh, ChiralperturbationtheoryfortheWilsonlatticeaction ,Phys.Rev.D 66(2002)054503 [hep-lat/0201019]

    2002 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Jenkins and A.V

    E.E. Jenkins and A.V. Manohar,Baryon chiral perturbation theory using a heavy fermion Lagrangian,Phys. Lett. B255(1991) 558

    1991

  52. [60]

    Bernard, N

    V. Bernard, N. Kaiser and U.-G. Meissner,Chiral dynamics in nucleons and nuclei,Int. J. Mod. Phys. E4(1995) 193 [hep-ph/9501384]

    1995 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Beane and M.J

    S.R. Beane and M.J. Savage,Nucleon properties at finite lattice spacing in chiral perturbation theory,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 114502 [hep-lat/0306036]

    2003 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Akaike,Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle, (New York), Springer Science+Business Media (1998), DOI

    H. Akaike,Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle, (New York), Springer Science+Business Media (1998), DOI

    1998

  55. [63]

    Jay and E.T

    W.I. Jay and E.T. Neil,Bayesian model averaging for analysis of lattice field theory results,Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 114502 [2008.01069]

    2021 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Bennett, D.K

    E. Bennett, D.K. Hong, H. Hsiao, J.-W. Lee, C.J.D. Lin, B. Lucini et al.,Meson Spectroscopy in the Sp(4) gauge theory with three antisymmetric fermions—in preparation, . 12

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.