Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

What do physics-informed DeepONets learn? Understanding and improving training for scientific computing applications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.18459 v1 pith:NQRRWBCN submitted 2024-11-27 cs.LG cs.NAmath.NA

classification cs.LGcs.NAmath.NA
keywords physics-informeddeeponetsapproachbasisfunctionsimprovinglearnedpdes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Physics-informed deep operator networks (DeepONets) have emerged as a promising approach toward numerically approximating the solution of partial differential equations (PDEs). In this work, we aim to develop further understanding of what is being learned by physics-informed DeepONets by assessing the universality of the extracted basis functions and demonstrating their potential toward model reduction with spectral methods. Results provide clarity about measuring the performance of a physics-informed DeepONet through the decays of singular values and expansion coefficients. In addition, we propose a transfer learning approach for improving training for physics-informed DeepONets between parameters of the same PDE as well as across different, but related, PDEs where these models struggle to train well. This approach results in significant error reduction and learned basis functions that are more effective in representing the solution of a PDE.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Efficient Transformer-Inspired Variants of Physics-Informed Deep Operator Networks

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Six input-conditioned DeepONet variants match or approach modified DeepONet accuracy on four PDE benchmarks with roughly half the training time.

Pith tools